<Emphasis Type="Italic">Cdkn1c</Emphasis> (<Emphasis Type="Italic">p57</Emphasis><Superscript><Emphasis Type="Italic">Kip2</Emphasis></Superscript>) is the major regulator of embryonic growth within its imprinted domain on mouse distal chromosome 7

Background  

Cdkn1c encodes an embryonic cyclin-dependant kinase inhibitor that acts to negatively regulate cell proliferation and, in some tissues, to actively direct differentiation. This gene, which is an imprinted gene expressed only from the maternal allele, lies within a complex region on mouse distal chromosome 7, called the IC2 domain, which contains several other imprinted genes. Studies on mouse embryos suggest a key role for genomic imprinting in regulating embryonic growth and this has led to the proposal that imprinting evolved as a consequence of the mismatched contribution of parental resources in mammals.     

The origin and evolution of genomic imprinting and viviparity in mammals

Genomic imprinting is widespread in eutherian mammals. Marsupial mammals also have genomic imprinting, but in fewer loci. It has long been thought that genomic imprinting is somehow related to placentation and/or viviparity in mammals, although neither is restricted to mammals. Most imprinted genes are expressed in the placenta. There is no evidence for genomic imprinting in the egg-laying monotreme mammals, despite their short-lived placenta that transfers nutrients from mother to embryo. Post natal genomic imprinting also occurs, especially in the brain. However, little attention has been paid to the primary source of nutrition in the neonate in all mammals, the mammary gland. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) play an important role as imprinting control centres in each imprinted region which usually comprises both paternally and maternally expressed genes (PEGs and MEGs). The DMR is established in the male or female germline (the gDMR). Comprehensive comparative genome studies demonstrated that two imprinted regions, PEG10 and IGF2-H19, are conserved in both marsupials and eutherians and that PEG10 and H19 DMRs emerged in the therian ancestor at least 160 Ma, indicating the ancestral origin of genomic imprinting during therian mammal evolution. Importantly, these regions are known to be deeply involved in placental and embryonic growth. It appears that most maternal gDMRs are always associated with imprinting in eutherian mammals, but emerged at differing times during mammalian evolution. Thus, genomic imprinting could evolve from a defence mechanism against transposable elements that depended on DNA methylation established in germ cells.     

Characterization of the differentially methylated region of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Impact</Emphasis>gene that exhibits Glires-specific imprinting

Background  

Imprinted genes are exclusively expressed from one of the two parental alleles in a parent-of-origin-specific manner. In mammals, nearly 100 genes are documented to be imprinted. To understand the mechanism behind this gene regulation and to identify novel imprinted genes, common features of DNA sequences have been analyzed; however, the general features required for genomic imprinting have not yet been identified, possibly due to variability in underlying molecular mechanisms from locus to locus.     

Genomic imprinting in mammals-epigenetic parental memories

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon that brings the difference of expression between paternally or maternally derived alleles and is specific for mammals in vertebrates. This imprint is established in the parental germlines and then inherited to the next generation to regulate expression of imprinted genes that are essential to support proper embryonic development. More than one hundred imprinted genes have been identified in mice and humans. Some are essential for embryonic development, especially placental formation, and others regulate metabolism, behavior and physiological functions. In humans, disruption of genomic imprinting causes several diseases, including cancer. Recently, the molecular mechanisms of genomic imprinting are getting clarified. How do parents regulate gene expression of their children? Why and how is genomic imprinting evolved in mammals? The review offers a handful of recent progress in this area.     

Construction and evolution of imprinted loci in mammals

Genomic imprinting first evolved in mammals around the time that humans last shared a common ancestor with marsupials and monotremes (180-210 million years ago). Recent comparisons of large imprinted domains in these divergent mammalian groups have shown that imprinting evolved haphazardly at various times in different lineages, perhaps driven by different selective forces. Surprisingly, some imprinted domains were formed relatively recently, using non-imprinted components acquired from unexpected genomic regions. Rearrangement and the insertion of retrogenes, small nucleolar RNAs, microRNAs, differential CpG methylation and control by non-coding RNA often accompanied the acquisition of imprinting. Here, we use comparisons between different mammalian groups to chart the course of evolution of two related epigenetic regulatory systems in mammals: genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation.     

Genomic imprinting in ruminants: allele-specific gene expression in parthenogenetic sheep

Studies in the mouse have established that both parental genomes are essential for normal embryonic development. Parthenogenetic mouse embryos (which have two maternal genomes and no paternal genome), for example, are growth-retarded and die at early postimplantation stages. The distinct maternal and paternal contributions are mediated by genomic imprinting, an epigenetic mechanism by which the expression of certain genes is dependent on whether they are inherited from mother or father. Although comparative studies have established that many imprinted mouse (and rat) genes are allele-specifically expressed in humans as well (and vice versa), so far imprinting studies have not been performed in other mammalian species. When considering evolutionary theories of genomic imprinting, it would be important to know how widely it is conserved among placental mammals. We have investigated its conservation in a bovid ruminant, the domestic sheep, by comparing parthenogenetic and normal control embryos. Our study establishes that, like in the mouse, parthenogenetic development in sheep is associated with growth-retardation and does not proceed beyond early fetal stages. These developmental abnormalities are most likely caused by imprinted genes. We demonstrate that, indeed, like in mice and humans, the growth-related PEG1/MEST and Insulin-like Growth Factor 2 (IGF2) genes are expressed from the paternal chromosome in sheep. These observations suggest that genomic imprinting is conserved in a third, evolutionarily rather diverged group of placental mammals, the ruminants. Received: 13 May 1998 / Accepted: 16 July 1998     

Genomic imprinting of the type 3 thyroid hormone deiodinase gene: Regulation and developmental implications

Background

In recent years, findings in a number of animal and human models have ignited renewed interest in the type 3 deiodinase (D3), the main enzyme responsible for the inactivation of thyroid hormones. The induction of D3 in models of illness and injury has raised critical questions about the physiological significance of reduced thyroid hormone availability in those states. Phenotypes in transgenic mice lacking this enzyme also point to important developmental roles for D3. A critical determinant of D3 expression is genomic imprinting, an epigenetic phenomenon that regulates a small number of dosage-critical genes in the mammalian genome. The D3 gene (Dio3) is imprinted and preferentially expressed from one of the alleles in most tissues.

Scope of review

In the context of the physiological significance of D3 and the characteristics and purported origins of genomic imprinting, we review the current knowledge about the epigenetic mechanisms specifying gene dosage in the Dio3 locus.

Major conclusions

Altered Dio3 dosage is detrimental to development, suggesting that the level of thyroid hormone action needs to be exquisitely tailored in a timely fashion to the requirements of particular tissues. An appropriate Dio3 dosage is the result of the coordinated action of certain genomic elements and epigenetic marks in the Dlk1-Dio3 domain.

General significance

The imprinting of Dio3 prompts intriguing questions about why the level of thyroid hormone signaling should be regulated in this rare epigenetic manner, and to what extent altered Dio3 expression due to aberrant imprinting may be implicated in human conditions. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Thyroid hormone signalling.     

A critical assessment of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Mus musculus</Emphasis>gene function prediction using integrated genomic evidence

Background:

Several years after sequencing the human genome and the mouse genome, much remains to be discovered about the functions of most human and mouse genes. Computational prediction of gene function promises to help focus limited experimental resources on the most likely hypotheses. Several algorithms using diverse genomic data have been applied to this task in model organisms; however, the performance of such approaches in mammals has not yet been evaluated.

Results:

In this study, a standardized collection of mouse functional genomic data was assembled; nine bioinformatics teams used this data set to independently train classifiers and generate predictions of function, as defined by Gene Ontology (GO) terms, for 21,603 mouse genes; and the best performing submissions were combined in a single set of predictions. We identified strengths and weaknesses of current functional genomic data sets and compared the performance of function prediction algorithms. This analysis inferred functions for 76% of mouse genes, including 5,000 currently uncharacterized genes. At a recall rate of 20%, a unified set of predictions averaged 41% precision, with 26% of GO terms achieving a precision better than 90%.

Conclusion:

We performed a systematic evaluation of diverse, independently developed computational approaches for predicting gene function from heterogeneous data sources in mammals. The results show that currently available data for mammals allows predictions with both breadth and accuracy. Importantly, many highly novel predictions emerge for the 38% of mouse genes that remain uncharacterized.

     

Retrotransposon silencing by DNA methylation can drive mammalian genomic imprinting

Among mammals, only eutherians and marsupials are viviparous and have genomic imprinting that leads to parent-of-origin-specific differential gene expression. We used comparative analysis to investigate the origin of genomic imprinting in mammals. PEG10 (paternally expressed 10) is a retrotransposon-derived imprinted gene that has an essential role for the formation of the placenta of the mouse. Here, we show that an orthologue of PEG10 exists in another therian mammal, the marsupial tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii), but not in a prototherian mammal, the egg-laying platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus), suggesting its close relationship to the origin of placentation in therian mammals. We have discovered a hitherto missing link of the imprinting mechanism between eutherians and marsupials because tammar PEG10 is the first example of a differentially methylated region (DMR) associated with genomic imprinting in marsupials. Surprisingly, the marsupial DMR was strictly limited to the 5′ region of PEG10, unlike the eutherian DMR, which covers the promoter regions of both PEG10 and the adjacent imprinted gene SGCE. These results not only demonstrate a common origin of the DMR-associated imprinting mechanism in therian mammals but provide the first demonstration that DMR-associated genomic imprinting in eutherians can originate from the repression of exogenous DNA sequences and/or retrotransposons by DNA methylation.     

New implications on genomic adaptation derived from the Helicobacter pylori genome comparison

Background

Helicobacter pylori has a reduced genome and lives in a tough environment for long-term persistence. It evolved with its particular characteristics for biological adaptation. Because several H. pylori genome sequences are available, comparative analysis could help to better understand genomic adaptation of this particular bacterium.

Principal Findings

We analyzed nine H. pylori genomes with emphasis on microevolution from a different perspective. Inversion was an important factor to shape the genome structure. Illegitimate recombination not only led to genomic inversion but also inverted fragment duplication, both of which contributed to the creation of new genes and gene family, and further, homological recombination contributed to events of inversion. Based on the information of genomic rearrangement, the first genome scaffold structure of H. pylori last common ancestor was produced. The core genome consists of 1186 genes, of which 22 genes could particularly adapt to human stomach niche. H. pylori contains high proportion of pseudogenes whose genesis was principally caused by homopolynucleotide (HPN) mutations. Such mutations are reversible and facilitate the control of gene expression through the change of DNA structure. The reversible mutations and a quasi-panmictic feature could allow such genes or gene fragments frequently transferred within or between populations. Hence, pseudogenes could be a reservoir of adaptation materials and the HPN mutations could be favorable to H. pylori adaptation, leading to HPN accumulation on the genomes, which corresponds to a special feature of Helicobacter species: extremely high HPN composition of genome.

Conclusion

Our research demonstrated that both genome content and structure of H. pylori have been highly adapted to its particular life style.     

Epigenetic Resetting of a Gene Imprinted in Plant Embryos

Genomic imprinting resulting in the differential expression of maternal and paternal alleles in the fertilization products has evolved independently in placental mammals and flowering plants. In most cases, silenced alleles carry DNA methylation [1]. Whereas these methylation marks of imprinted genes are generally erased and reestablished in each generation in mammals [2], imprinting marks persist in endosperms [3], the sole tissue of reported imprinted gene expression in plants. Here we show that the maternally expressed in embryo 1 (mee1) gene of maize is imprinted in both the embryo and endosperm and that parent-of-origin-specific expression correlates with differential allelic methylation. This epigenetic asymmetry is maintained in the endosperm, whereas the embryonic maternal allele is demethylated on fertilization and remethylated later in embryogenesis. This report of imprinting in the plant embryo confirms that, as in mammals, epigenetic mechanisms operate to regulate allelic gene expression in both embryonic and extraembryonic structures. The embryonic methylation profile demonstrates that plants evolved a mechanism for resetting parent-specific imprinting marks, a necessary prerequisite for parent-of-origin-dependent gene expression in consecutive generations. The striking difference between the regulation of imprinting in the embryo and endosperm suggests that imprinting mechanisms might have evolved independently in both fertilization products of flowering plants.     

Dissecting microregulation of a master regulatory network

Background

All jawed-vertebrates have four T cell receptor (TCR) chains: alpha (TRA), beta (TRB), gamma (TRG) and delta (TRD). Marsupials appear unique by having an additional TCR: mu (TRM). The evolutionary origin of TRM and its relationship to other TCR remain obscure, and is confounded by previous results that support TRM being a hybrid between a TCR and immunoglobulin locus. The availability of the first marsupial genome sequence allows investigation of these evolutionary relationships.

Results

The organization of the conventional TCR loci, encoding the TRA, TRB, TRG and TRD chains, in the opossumMonodelphis domesticaare highly conserved with and of similar complexity to that of eutherians (placental mammals). There is a high degree of conserved synteny in the genomic regions encoding the conventional TCR across mammals and birds. In contrast the chromosomal region containing TRM is not well conserved across mammals. None of the conventional TCR loci contain variable region gene segments with homology to those found in TRM; rather TRM variable genes are most similar to that of immunoglobulin heavy chain genes.

Conclusion

Complete genomic analyses of the opossum TCR loci continue to support an origin of TRM as a hybrid between a TCR and immunoglobulin locus. None of the conventional TCR loci contain evidence that such a recombination event occurred, rather they demonstrate a high degree of stability across distantly related mammals. TRM, therefore, appears to be derived from receptor genes no longer extant in placental mammals. These analyses provide the first genomic scale structural detail of marsupial TCR genes, a lineage of mammals used as models of early development and human disease.     

The evolution of imprinting: chromosomal mapping of orthologues of mammalian imprinted domains in monotreme and marsupial mammals

Background  

The evolution of genomic imprinting, the parental-origin specific expression of genes, is the subject of much debate. There are several theories to account for how the mechanism evolved including the hypothesis that it was driven by the evolution of X-inactivation, or that it arose from an ancestrally imprinted chromosome.     

A rheostat model for a rapid and reversible form of imprinting-dependent evolution

The evolutionary advantages of genomic imprinting are puzzling. We propose that genomic imprinting evolved as a mechanism that maximizes the interindividual variability in the rates of gene expression for dosage-sensitive loci that, with minimal unrelated deleterious effects, can alter the phenotype over a wide continuum. We hypothesize (1) that genomic imprinting provides a previously suggested haploid selective advantage (HSA); (2) that many imprinted genes have evolved mechanisms that facilitate quantitative hypervariability (QH) of gene expression; (3) that the combination of HSA and QH makes possible a rapid and reversible form of imprinting-dependent evolution (IDE) that can mediate changes in phenotype; and (4) that this enhanced adaptability to a changing environment provides selective advantage to the population, as an assisted form of evolution. These mechanisms may have provided at least one of the driving forces for the evolution of genomic imprinting in mammals. The rheostat model suggests that both genetic and epigenetic variants can contribute to an integrated mechanism of mixed Mendelian and non-Mendelian inheritance and suggests the possibility that the majority of variants are not intrinsically deleterious but, depending on the environment, are each potentially advantageous. Moreover, this would be a reversible form of evolution, with the ability not only to protect a silent allele from selection for many generations but to reactivate and expand it in the population quickly.     

Etablissement de l’empreinte parentale dans la lignée germinale. Conséquences pour la prise en charge en AMP

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon in eutherian mammals that results in the differential expression of the paternally and maternally inherited alleles of a gene. Imprinted genes are necessary for normal mammalian development. Parental specific epigenetic modifications are imprinted on a subset of genes in the mammalian genome during germ cell maturation. Imprinting involves both cytosine methylation within CpG islands and changes in chromatin structure. All such epigenetic modifications are potentially reversible and can be erased. After the erasure step, new parental imprints are initiated, resulting in reintroduction of sex-specific imprints in the male and female germ line. Although the function of genomic imprinting is not clear, it has been proposed that it evolved in mammals to regulate intrauterine growth and mammalian development. If the epigenotype of individual gametes is directly correlated with their later developmental capacities, genomic imprinting would have important practical implications in reproductive medicine for the use of embryos derived from assisted reproduction.     

A composite genome approach to identify phylogenetically informative data from next-generation sequencing

Background

Improvements in sequencing technology now allow easy acquisition of large datasets; however, analyzing these data for phylogenetics can be challenging. We have developed a novel method to rapidly obtain homologous genomic data for phylogenetics directly from next-generation sequencing reads without the use of a reference genome. This software, called SISRS, avoids the time consuming steps of de novo whole genome assembly, multiple genome alignment, and annotation.

Results

For simulations SISRS is able to identify large numbers of loci containing variable sites with phylogenetic signal. For genomic data from apes, SISRS identified thousands of variable sites, from which we produced an accurate phylogeny. Finally, we used SISRS to identify phylogenetic markers that we used to estimate the phylogeny of placental mammals. We recovered eight phylogenies that resolved the basal relationships among mammals using datasets with different levels of missing data. The three alternate resolutions of the basal relationships are consistent with the major hypotheses for the relationships among mammals, all of which have been supported previously by different molecular datasets.

Conclusions

SISRS has the potential to transform phylogenetic research. This method eliminates the need for expensive marker development in many studies by using whole genome shotgun sequence data directly. SISRS is open source and freely available at https://github.com/rachelss/SISRS/releases.