Modified method of differential staining of sister chromatids]

A modified method of obtaining differential staining of sister chromatids is described. It is simple, rapid, and effective, and at the same time inexpensive and accessible, since it allows one to use available reagents. When 5-bromdeoxyuridine was administered 24 hours before fixation into the Chinese hamster cell culture the percentage of metaphases with a differential chromatid staining constituted 95--98, and when this substance was administered 28 hours before fixation into the human lymphocyte culture this percentage varied from 75 to 92, depending on the individual. The mean number of sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes failed to depend on the time of fixation.     

Simple differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids after treatment with photosensitive dyes and exposure to light and the mechanism of staining

The essential steps of the 33258 Hoechst-Giemsa method for differential chromatid staining consist of (1) 33258 Hoechst treatment, (2) exposure to light, and (3) Giemsa staining. The staining was shown to be a function of the concentration of 33258 Hoechst and the light exposure. The dye was successfully replaced by various metachromatic dyes such as thionine. Two simple methods are proposed. Failure of the pale stained chromatids to restore Giemsa affinity with urea and trypsin and the diminished Feulgen reaction after light exposure suggest that not masking proteins but photolysis of the BrdU-incorporation chromatid components in the present of photosensitive dyes play a role in the differential staining.     

“Reverse” differential staining of sister chromatids

A technique for the differential staining of sister chromatids with basic fuchsin is described. The resulting staining pattern is the reverse of that obtained with a similar technique using Giemsa dye.     

On the mechanism of differential giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromatids

This paper analyses the effect of acid hydrolysis on the differential Giemsa staining of 5-bromo-2deoxyuridine (BrdU) substituted chromatids in human and plant chromosomes, after treatment with a fluorochrome and light. Human lymphocytes and Allium cepa L. root tips were grown in BrdU for two or three cell cycles. Lymphocyte spreadings and meristem squashes were treated with fluorochrome Hoechst 33258, exposed to sunlight, hydrolysed with 5N HCl and stained with Giemsa. This acid hydrolysis improves the differential staining of BrdU substituted and non-substituted chromatin. It also allows the differentiation of sister chromatids with the DNA specific dye azure-A.     

Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids induced by Hoechst plus black light and endonuclease

A differential Giemsa staining between sister chromatids was obtained by treating chromosomes replicated twice in medium containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) with Hoechst 33258 plus black light at 55 degrees C (HB pretreatment) and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I, II, or micrococcal nuclease. In this staining pattern the BrdU bifilarly substituted chromatids were darkly and the unifilarly substituted chromatids lightly stained. This staining pattern was obtained only by staining the HB-DNase I-treated chromosomes with Giemsa and methylene blue, not by several other dyes tested. Relatively more DNA labelling was removed from the non-BrdU-substituted than the BrdU-substituted chromosomes, when the HB-pretreated chromosomes were digested with DNase I. But the protein labelling was not removed appreciably in the same treatment. The differential DNase I sensitivity between the non-BrdU-substituted and BrdU-substituted chromosomes disappeared when the HB-pretreated chromosomes were incubated with proteinase K before The DNase I digestion. Moreover, no differential DNase I sensitivity was found between the HB-pretreated isolated DNA containing and not containing BrdU. We propose that during the HB pretreatment, more DNA-protein cross-linkings are induced in BrdU bifilarly substituted than the unifilarly substituted chromatids. This structure protects the chromosomal DNA against the DNase I digestion. Thus, a reverse differential Giemsa staining between sister chromatids is obtained by the HB-DNase I treatment.     

Three-way differential staining of sister chromatids in M3 chromosomes : Evidence for spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges in vitro

Three types of Giemsa differential staining of sister chromatids were observed in HeLa cells when they were exposed continuously to 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) for three replication cycles. In type-1, about a half set of chromosome complements were composed of pairs of darkly-stained and intermediately-stained chromatids; the other half consisted of pairs of intermediately-stained and lightly-stained chromatids. In type-2, one fourth of chromatids was stained darkly and the remaining ones were stained lightly. In type-3, about a half set of chromosomes consisted of the pairs of darkly-stained and lightly-stained chromatids and the rest of pairs of intermediately-stained and lightly-stained chromatids. Cells showing each differentiation pattern at the third mitotic phase were dependent on the stages of the first DNA synthetic (S) phase at which BrdUrd treatments were initiated. Type-1 cells were observed, when BrdUrd treatment was initiated anywhere from G1 to early S phase, type-2 when treatments were begun in middle S stage, and type-3 when treatments were initiated in the late stages of the first S phase. The appearance of the three types seems to be caused by a different amount of BrdUrd incorporated into DNA between the first (S1) and the second S period (S2). The amount of BrdUrd incorporated is as follows: in type-1 S1>S2, in type-2 S1 S2 and in type-3 S2>S1.By analysing type-1 cells, all of the sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) occurring during each replication cycle can be accurately counted and distinguished from one another. In cells exposed to BrdUrd above 5 μg/ml, the frequencies of SCEs occurring during S1, S2, and S3 are higher than those detected at lower BrdUrd concentrations. On the other hand, at lower concentrations (0.1–1.0 μg/ml) they occurred at the same frequency during S1, S2, and S3. Thus, SCEs detected at low concentrations are free from the incremental effect of BrdUrd incorporated, and enable us to estimate the spontaneous level of SCE frequency.     

DNA lysis is involved in the simplified fluorescence plus Giemsa method for differential staining of sister chromatids

The DNA labelling of the bifilarly 5-bromodeoxyuridine- to-substituted chromatid decreased relative to that of the unifilarly substituted chromatid with increasing duration of HB pretreatment (Hoechst 33258 plus black light at 55° C). Sister chromatid differential staining was detected by Giemsa as well as a DNA-specific dye, ethidium bromide, after 4 s of HB pretreatment. The contrast of sister chromatid differential staining was improved with increased duration of HB pretreatment or by incubation with exonucleases. Hydrogen donors such as cysteamine, cysteine, and L-ascorbic acid inhibited the HB pretreatment, but this inhibition could be overcome by increasing the duration of HB pretreatment.     

Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids after substitution with BUdR and incubation in sodium phosphate solution

Chinese hamster strain cells were cultured in the presence of BUdR and air-dried on slides. The chromosome preparations were incubated in 1 M NaH₂PO₄ at 88 °C for 4–6 min and stained with Giemsa. The reverse type of sister chromatid differential staining occurred, in which unifilarly BUdR-substituted chromatids stained faintly and bifilarly substituted chromatids stained darkly. Feulgen reaction performed on the same chromosomes after removing Giemsa stain showed the same type of differential staining.     

Factors involved in differential giemsa-staining of sister chromatids

Microspectrophotometric evaluation of differentially stained sister chromatids made it possible to analyse precisely the factors involved in the Giemsa methods. The concentration of Hoechst 33258, pH of the mounting medium, temperature during UV-exposure and the quality (wavelength) of UV-light influenced the differential staining. Exposure of blacklight of 10^–5 M Hoechst 33528-stained BrdU-labeled chromosome specimens mounted in McIlvaine buffer (pH 8.0) at 50° C reproducibly allowed differential staining of sister chromatids within 15 min. On the other hand, Korenberg-Freedlender's method using no Hoechst 33258 was also UV-light-dependent. Thus, photolysis of BrdU-substituted DNA was considered the basic mechanism of the Giemsa methods where the photosensitive Hoechst 33258 played a role as a sensitizer.     

Differential giemsa staining of sister chromatids after extraction with acids

Chromosomes of Chinese hamster strain cells were air-dried on slides after BrdU substitution for two or three rounds of replication. The preparations were treated with 20% PCA at 55 degrees C for 20-30 min, or 5N HCl at 55 degrees C for 15-20 min. After staining with Giemsa, unifilarly BrdU-substituted chromatids stained faintly and bifilarly substituted chromatids stained darkly. Such a pattern of sister chromatid differential staining was confirmed by the examination of metaphase cells grown with BrdU for three rounds of replication.     

Selective differential staining of sister chromatids of the facultative heterochromatic X chromosome in the female mouse

Selective differential staining of sister chromatids for the facultative heterochromatic X chromosome in the female mouse has been achieved by the combination of two differential staining techniques; one for the heterochromatic X chromosome and the other for sister chromatids. Thermal hypotonic treatment moderately destroyed the chromosome structure except for the heterochromatic X in BrdU labelled metaphase cells, resulting in the selective sister chromatid differentiation of this X with Giemsa stain. This technique enables us to know the exact frequency of the spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges in the heterochromatic X without using ³H-TdR labelling for detecting the late DNA replication. The results indicate that the sister chromatid exchange frequency of the heterochromatic X chromosome is not affected by its late DNA replication during S phase, or by the genetic inactivation and the resulting heterochromatinization.     

Differential silver carbonate staining of sister chromatids in BrdU-substituted chromosomes

Summary Differential staining of sister chromatids in BrdU-substituted human chromosomes is demonstrated by an ammoniacal silver carbonate procedure. With this method the chromosomes exhibit a subchromatid structure. Because proteolytic treatment indicated that the silver carbonate binds the chromosome proteins, changes of these components may be inferred in the BrdU-substituted chromosomes. Sister chromatid exchanges could be identified.This study was supported in part by research grant 12/119/77 from the Instituto Nacional de Previsión (Seguridad Social).     

Opposite staining effect of two silver-staining techniques on sister chromatids

Opposite differential staining between sister chromatids was obtained by two silver-staining techniques on chromosomes replicated twice in medium containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and pretreated with Hoechst plus black light. Both silver-nitrate and silver-carbonate staining were affected by chemical extraction and enzyme digestion of chromosomal proteins. Prestaining of silver nitrate or silver carbonate also blocked the fluorescences of protein dyes. However, removal of chromosomal DNA affected the silver-carbonate but not the silver-nitrate staining; the fluorescences of DNA dyes were blocked by the prestaining of silver carbonate but not silver nitrate. Chromosomal protein labelling was released only slightly and its relative amount between BrdU bifilarly substituted and unifilarly substituted chromatids was unchanged during pretreatment of Hoechst plus black light. We speculate that chromosomal non-histones are the targets for silver-nitrate stain, and DNA-non-histone complexes for silver-carbonate stain.     

Differential giemsa staining of sister chromatids and the study of sister chromatid exchanges without autoradiography

Chinese hamster ovary cells grown for two rounds of DNA replication in the presence of BrdUrd contain sister chromatids that fluoresce differentially when stained with Hoechst 33258. If such fluorescent treatments are followed by incubation in 2 X SSC or water at 62° C and staining in 3% Giemsa, the chromosomes now contain one dark (unifilarly substituted) chromatid and one light (bifilarly substituted) chromatid, i.e. are harlequinized. These preparations do not fade and can be studied without resorting to fluorescence microscopy. Sister chromatid exchanges (SCE's) are seen with great clarity and resolution; and all the chromosomes in a cell can be scored, which is contrary to the usual experience with autoradiography. It was found that a) the yield of SCE's is dependent upon the concentration of BrdUrd in which the cells are grown and that the maximum number of SCE's that can occur spontaneously is 0.15 per chromosome per division cycle, b) the yield of SCE's doubles if the cells are exposed to visible light that can cause the photolysis of BrdUrd-containing DNA, and c) chromosomes that appear isolabelled in autoradiographic preparations come from observable multiple exchanges and are not the result of the segregation of DNA from a binemic chromosome. Furthermore, the staining patterns obtained in endoreduplicated cells clearly confirm that the polynucleotide strands of the DNA segregate into sister chromatids as though the newly synthesized strands were laid on the outside of the replicating double helix.     

The role of chromosomal proteins in the induction of a differential staining of sister chromatids by light

Summary Fixed chromosomes of human lymphocytes, cultured in the presence of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) during two cell cycles, were exposed to near-ultraviolet irradiation, stained with Giemsa, and after destaining, were subjected to either Coomassie Blue or Feulgen-Schiff staining. A differential reaction of sister chromatids was first revealed by Coomassie Blue staining. Differential staining with Giemsa required a longer irradiation time. This appeared to be reduced after the addition of dithiodipyridine to the cells during their last few hours of culture. The differential pattern obtained after Coomassie Blue staining was the inverse of that obtained after Giemsa staining. From these findings we concluded that the induction of sister chromatid differentiation by light in BrdU-substituted DNA containing chromosomes occurs primarily via chromosomal proteins, presumably by differential breakage of their disulphide bonds. The results of the Feulgen-Schiff staining indicated that differential depurination of BrdU-containing DNA could occur, although only after very prolonged irradiation. A faint though distinctly differential Feulgen-Schiff pattern of sister chromated staining, resulting from differential removal of DNA, was observed after photosensitization by specific DNA-binding dyes. Thus, DNA seems to be affected only under more extreme conditions.     

Evaluation of cell proliferation kinetics by the differential staining of the sister chromatids at 2 points of cell fixation

Lymphocyte proliferation in blood cultures from 23 normal individuals was studied. A simple method of evaluation of cell proliferative kinetics with sister chromatid differential staining using two different points of cell harvesting was suggested. It was shown that different composition of tissue culture medium plays a significant role during the cell exit from G0 stage, the mean doubling generation time of cellular population remaining constant.     

Method of differential staining of sister chromatids for the study of the effects of gamma rays on the frequency of sister chromatid exchange in human lymphocytes]

Human lymphocytes were incubated during two cycles of replication in the presence of 5-bromodeoxyuridine, fixed after a 96 hours cultivation, stained with fluorescenct compound "Hoechst 33258", illuminated with sunlight and repeatedly stained with azureosine. After such a treatment, the two chromatids of metaphase chromosomes are stained with different intensity revealing numerous sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) which could be exactly recorded. In spite of the use if tge standard technique, the frequency of SCE was different in two donors. Irradiation after a 47 hours incubation (mainly G2 stage of the first cycle) increased the frequency of SCE, whereas the irradiation 2 hours before fixation (G2 stage of the second cycle) decreased it. The change of the frequence of SCE produced by irradiation was not proportional to the chromosome length.