The involvement of peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) in prostaglandin F2α production by porcine endometrium

In the present study, we investigated the in vitro effects of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) ligands on PGF_2α secretion and mRNA expression of prostaglandin F synthase (PGFS) in porcine endometrial explants collected on days 10–12 and 14–16 of the estrous cycle or pregnancy. The explants were incubated for 6 h with: PPARα ligands – WY-14643 (agonist) and MK 886 (antagonist); PPARβ ligands – l-165,041 (agonist) and GW 9662 (antagonist); PPARγ ligands – 15d-prostaglandin J₂ (PGJ₂, agonist), rosiglitazone (agonist) and T0070907 (antagonist). The expression of PGFS mRNA in the endometrium and the concentration of PGF_2α in culture media were determined by real time RT-PCR and radioimmunoassay, respectively. During the estrous cycle (days 10–12 and 14–16), the agonists – WY-14643 (PPARα), l-165,041 (PPARβ), PGJ₂ and rosiglitazone (PPARγ) – increased PGF_2α secretion but did not affect PGFS mRNA abundance. During pregnancy (days 10–12 and 14–16), PPARα and PPARγ ligands did not change PGF_2α release, whereas PPARβ agonist augmented PGF_2α release on days 14–16 of pregnancy. In addition, WY-14643 and l-165,041 increased PGFS mRNA level in both examined periods of pregnancy. PPARγ agonist (PGJ₂) and antagonist (T0070907) enhanced PGFS mRNA abundance in the endometrium on days 10–12 and 14–16 of pregnancy, respectively. The results indicate that PPARs are involved in the production of PGF_2α by porcine endometrium, and that the sensitivity of the endometrium to PPAR ligands depends on reproductive status of animals.     

Different skeletal effects of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)α agonist fenofibrate and the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone

Background

All the peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are found to be expressed in bone cells. The PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone has been shown to decrease bone mass in mice and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have recently been found to increase bone loss and fracture risk in humans treated for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The aim of the study was to examine the effect of the PPARα agonist fenofibrate (FENO) and the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone (PIO) on bone in intact female rats.

Methods

Rats were given methylcellulose (vehicle), fenofibrate or pioglitazone (35 mg/kg body weight/day) by gavage for 4 months. BMC, BMD, and body composition were measured by DXA. Histomorphometry and biomechanical testing of excised femurs were performed. Effects of the compounds on bone cells were studied.

Results

The FENO group had higher femoral BMD and smaller medullary area at the distal femur; while trabecular bone volume was similar to controls. Whole body BMD, BMC, and trabecular bone volume were lower, while medullary area was increased in PIO rats compared to controls. Ultimate bending moment and energy absorption of the femoral shafts were reduced in the PIO group, while similar to controls in the FENO group. Plasma osteocalcin was higher in the FENO group than in the other groups. FENO stimulated proliferation and differentiation of, and OPG release from, the preosteoblast cell line MC3T3-E1.

Conclusion

We show opposite skeletal effects of PPARα and γ agonists in intact female rats. FENO resulted in significantly higher femoral BMD and lower medullary area, while PIO induced bone loss and impairment of the mechanical strength. This represents a novel effect of PPARα activation.     

Medium chain fatty acids are selective peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) γ activators and pan-PPAR partial agonists

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) act through peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) γ to increase insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes (T2DM), but deleterious effects of these ligands mean that selective modulators with improved clinical profiles are needed. We obtained a crystal structure of PPARγ ligand binding domain (LBD) and found that the ligand binding pocket (LBP) is occupied by bacterial medium chain fatty acids (MCFAs). We verified that MCFAs (C8-C10) bind the PPARγ LBD in vitro and showed that they are low-potency partial agonists that display assay-specific actions relative to TZDs; they act as very weak partial agonists in transfections with PPARγ LBD, stronger partial agonists with full length PPARγ and exhibit full blockade of PPARγ phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (cdk5), linked to reversal of adipose tissue insulin resistance. MCFAs that bind PPARγ also antagonize TZD-dependent adipogenesis in vitro. X-ray structure B-factor analysis and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations suggest that MCFAs weakly stabilize C-terminal activation helix (H) 12 relative to TZDs and this effect is highly dependent on chain length. By contrast, MCFAs preferentially stabilize the H2-H3/β-sheet region and the helix (H) 11-H12 loop relative to TZDs and we propose that MCFA assay-specific actions are linked to their unique binding mode and suggest that it may be possible to identify selective PPARγ modulators with useful clinical profiles among natural products.     

Agonism activities of lyso-phosphatidylcholines (LPC) Ligands binding to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ)

Abstract

PPARγ is an isoform of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) belonging to a super family of nuclear receptors and is a primary target of the effective drug to treat the type II diabetes. The experiments found that Lyso-phosphatidylcholines (LPC) could bind to PPARγ, but the binding modes remain unknown. We used the Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamic (MD) simulations to study the binding of four LPC ligands (LPC16:0, LPC18:0, LPC18:1-1 and LPC18:1-2) to PPARγ. The two-step MD simulations were employed to determine the final binding modes. The 20?ns MD simulations for four final LPC-PPARγ complexes were performed to analyze their structures, the binding key residues, and agonism activities. The results reveal that three LPC ligands (LPC16:0, LPC18:0 and LPC18:1-1) bind to Arm II and III regions of the Ligand Binding Domain (LBD) pocket, whereas they do not interact with Tyr473 of Helix 12 (H12). In contrast, LPC18:1-2 can form the hydrogen bonds with Tyr473 and bind into Arm I and II regions. Comparing with the paradigm systems of the full agonist (Rosiglitazone–PPARγ) and the partial agonist (MRL24–PPARγ), our results indicate that LPC16:0, LPC18:0 and LPC18:1-1 could be the potential partial agonists and LPC18:1-2 could be a full agonist. The in-depth analysis of the residue fluctuations and structure alignment confirm the present prediction of the LPC agonism activities.

Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma     

Expression of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ gene is repressed by DNA methylation in visceral adipose tissue of mouse models of diabetes

Background  

Adipose tissues serve not only as a store for energy in the form of lipid, but also as endocrine tissues that regulates metabolic activities of the organism by secreting various kinds of hormones. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a key regulator of adipocyte differentiation that induces the expression of adipocyte-specific genes in preadipocytes and mediates their differentiation into adipocytes. Furthermore, PPARγ has an important role to maintain the physiological function of mature adipocyte by controlling expressions of various genes properly. Therefore, any reduction in amount and activity of PPARγ is linked to the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome.     

Roles for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and PPARγ coactivators 1α and 1β in regulating response of white and brown adipocytes to hypoxia

Obese white adipose tissue is hypoxic but is incapable of inducing compensatory angiogenesis. Brown adipose tissue is highly vascularized, facilitating delivery of nutrients to brown adipocytes for heat production. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms by which white and brown adipocytes respond to hypoxia. Brown adipocytes produced lower amounts of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) than white adipocytes in response to low O(2) but induced higher levels of hypoxia-associated genes. The response of white adipocytes to hypoxia required HIF-1α, but its presence alone was incapable of inducing target gene expression under normoxic conditions. In addition to the HIF-1α targets, hypoxia also induced many inflammatory genes. Exposure of white adipocytes to a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) ligand (troglitazone) attenuated induction of these genes but enhanced expression of the HIF-1α targets. Knockdown of PPARγ in mature white adipocytes prevented the usual robust induction of HIF-1α targets in response to hypoxia. Similarly, knockdown of PPARγ coactivator (PGC) 1β in PGC-1α-deficient brown adipocytes eliminated their response to hypoxia. These data demonstrate that the response of white adipocytes requires HIF-1α but also depends on PPARγ in white cells and the PPARγ cofactors PGC-1α and PGC-1β in brown cells.     

Towards understanding leydigioma: do G protein-coupled estrogen receptor and peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor regulate lipid metabolism and steroidogenesis in Leydig cell tumors?

Protoplasma - Leydig cell tumors (LCT) are the most common type of testicular stromal tumor. Herein, we investigate the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) and peroxisome...     

Diabetes: New conductors for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) orchestra

The PPARγ nuclear receptor orchestrates fatty acid storage and glucose metabolism by coordinating the expression of genes involved in lipid uptake, adipogenesis and inflammation. It is a target for the insulin-sensitising thiazolidinediones (TZDs) which have been used to treat diabetes since the late nineties. Adverse secondary effects of TZDs have underpinned continued investigations into the molecular details governing PPARγ regulation and new therapeutic approaches which represent the focus of this article. Recent findings position Cdk5 as a lead conductor of PPARγ. Cdk5 regulates PPARγ directly, via phosphorylation, and may also inhibit it indirectly, via phosphorylation and activation of phospholipase D2 (PLD2) which generates the endogenous inhibitor cyclic phosphatidic acid (CPA). Whilst the multifunctional nature of Cdk5 precludes it from therapeutic targeting all is not lost as selective PPARγ modulators (SPPARMs) have shown promising preclinical and clinical results heralding a new generation of drugs to conduct a more refined PPARγ program.     

Stable reporter cell lines for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ)-mediated modulation of gene expression

Phosphatidylinositol (PtdIns) is phosphorylated at D-3, D-4, and/or D-5 of the inositol ring to produce seven distinct lipid second messengers known as phosphoinositides (PIs). The PI level is temporally and spatially controlled at the cytosolic face of the cellular membrane. Effectors containing PI-binding domains (e.g., PH, PX, FYVE, ENTH, FERM) associate with specific PIs. This process is crucial for the localization of a variety of cell-signaling proteins, thereby regulating intracellular membrane trafficking, cell growth and survival, cytoskeletal organization, and so on. However, quantitative assessments of protein–PI interactions are generally difficult due to insolubility of PIs in aqueous solution. Here we incorporated PIs into a lipid–protein nanoscale bilayer (nanodisc), which is applied for studying the protein–PI interactions using pull-down binding assay, fluorescence polarization, and nuclear magnetic resonance studies, each facilitating fast, quantitative, and residue-specific evaluation of the protein–PI interactions. Therefore, the PI-incorporated nanodisc could be used as a versatile tool for studying the protein–lipid interactions by various biochemical and biophysical techniques.     

Stable reporter cell lines for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ)-mediated modulation of gene expression

Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) by ligands is associated with beneficial health effects, including anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing effects. The aim of the current study was to develop luciferase reporter gene assays to enable fast and low-cost measurement of PPARγ agonist and antagonist activity. Two reporter gene assays, PPARγ1 CALUX and PPARγ2 CALUX, were developed by stable transfection of U2OS cells with an expression vector for PPARγ1 or PPARγ2 and a pGL3–3xPPRE–tata-luc or pGL4–3xPPRE–tata-luc reporter construct, respectively. PPARγ1 CALUX and PPARγ2 CALUX cells showed similar concentration-dependent luciferase induction upon exposure to the PPARγ agonists rosiglitazone, troglitazone, pioglitazone, ciglitazone, netoglitazone, and 15-deoxy-Δ^12,14-prostaglandin J₂. The potency to induce luciferase decreased in the following order: rosiglitazone > troglitazone = pioglitazone > netoglitazone > ciglitazone. A concentration-dependent decrease in the response to 50 nM rosiglitazone was observed on the addition of PPARγ antagonist GW9662 or T0070907 in both PPARγ1 CALUX and PPARγ2 CALUX cells. The PPARα agonists WY14643 and fenofibrate failed to induce luciferase activity, confirming the specificity of these cell lines for PPARγ agonists. In conclusion, PPARγ1 CALUX and PPARγ2 CALUX cells provide a reliable and useful tool to screen (bio)chemicals for PPARγ agonist or antagonist activity.     

Hepatic over-expression of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ2 in the ob/ob mouse model of non‐insulin dependent diabetes mellitus

The binding of nuclear factor on the promoter region of the regucalcin gene and the expression of regucalcin in the kidney cortex of rats was investigated. Nuclear extracts from kidney cortex were used for oligonucleotide competition gel mobility shift assay. An oligonucleotide between position –523 and –506 in the 5-flanking region of the rat regucalcin gene, which contains a nuclear factor I (NF1) consensus motif TTGGC(N)₆CC, competed with the probe for the binding of the nuclear protein from kidney cortex. The mutation of TTGGC in the consensus sequence caused an inhibition of the binding of nuclear factors. The binding of nuclear factor on the 5-flanking region was clearly reduced in the kidney cortex obtained at 1, 2, and 3 days after a single intraperitoneal administration of cisplatin (1.0 mg/100 g body wt) to rats. Moreover, cisplatin administration caused a remarkable decrease in regucalcin mRNA levels and regucalcin concentration in the kidney cortex. Also, serum regucalcin concentration was significantly decreased by cisplatin administration. Meanwhile, serum urea nitrogen concentration was markedly elevated by cisplatin administration. The present study demonstrates that the specific nuclear factor binds to the NF1-like sequence in the promotor region of regucalcin gene in the kidney cortex of rats, and that the nuclear factor binding and regucalcin expression are suppressed by cisplatin administration.