Enzymatic tRNA acylation by acid and alpha-hydroxy acid analogues of amino acids

Incorporation of unnatural amino acids with unique chemical functionalities has proven to be a valuable tool for expansion of the functional repertoire and properties of proteins as well as for structure-function analysis. Incorporation of alpha-hydroxy acids (primary amino group is substituted with hydroxyl) leads to the synthesis of proteins with peptide bonds being substituted by ester bonds. Practical application of this modification is limited by the necessity to prepare corresponding acylated tRNA by chemical synthesis. We investigated the possibility of enzymatic incorporation of alpha-hydroxy acid and acid analogues (lacking amino group) of amino acids into tRNA using aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs). We studied direct acylation of tRNAs by alpha-hydroxy acid and acid analogues of amino acids and corresponding chemically synthesized analogues of aminoacyl-adenylates. Using adenylate analogues we were able to enzymatically acylate tRNA with amino acid analogues which were otherwise completely inactive in direct aminoacylation reaction, thus bypassing the natural mechanisms ensuring the selectivity of tRNA aminoacylation. Our results are the first demonstration that the use of synthetic aminoacyl-adenylates as substrates in tRNA aminoacylation reaction may provide a way for incorporation of unnatural amino acids into tRNA, and consequently into proteins.     

Initiation of in vivo protein synthesis with non-methionine amino acids

Methionine is the universal amino acid for initiation of protein synthesis in all known organisms. The amino acid is coupled to a specific initiator methionine tRNA by methionyl-tRNA synthetase. In Escherichia coli, attachment of methionine to the initiator tRNA (tRNA(fMet)) has been shown to be dependent on synthetase recognition of the methionine anticodon CAU (complementary to the initiation codon AUG), [Schulman, L. H., & Pelka, H. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 6755-6759]. We show here that alteration of the anticodon of tRNA(fMet) to GAC or GAA leads to aminoacylation of the initiator tRNA with valine or phenylalanine. In addition, tRNA(fMet) carrying these amino acids initiates in vivo protein synthesis when provided with initiation codons complementary to the modified anticodons. These results indicate that the sequence of the anticodon of tRNA(fMet) dictates the identity of the amino acid attached to the initiator tRNA in vivo and that there are no subsequent steps which prevent initiation of E. coli protein synthesis by valine and phenylalanine. The methods described here also provide a convenient in vivo assay for further examination of the role of the anticodon in tRNA amino acid acceptor identity.     

Identifying the ligated amino acid of archaeal tRNAs based on positions outside the anticodon

Proper recognition of tRNAs by their aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is essential for translation accuracy. Following evidence that the enzymes can recognize the correct tRNA even when anticodon information is masked, we search for additional nucleotide positions within the tRNA molecule that potentially contain information for amino acid identification. Analyzing 3936 sequences of tRNA genes from 86 archaeal species, we show that the tRNAs’ cognate amino acids can be identified by the information embedded in the tRNAs’ nucleotide positions without relying on the anticodon information. We present a small set of six to 10 informative positions along the tRNA, which allow for amino acid identification accuracy of 90.6% to 97.4%, respectively. We inspected tRNAs for each of the 20 amino acid types for such informative positions and found that tRNA genes for some amino acids are distinguishable from others by as few as one or two positions. The informative nucleotide positions are in agreement with nucleotide positions that were experimentally shown to affect the loaded amino acid identity. Interestingly, the knowledge gained from the tRNA genes of one archaeal phylum does not extrapolate well to another phylum. Furthermore, each species has a unique ensemble of nucleotides in the informative tRNA positions, and the similarity between the sets of positions of two distinct species reflects their evolutionary distance. Hence, we term this set of informative positions a “tRNA cipher.” It is tempting to suggest that the diverging code identified here might also serve the aminoacyl tRNA synthetase in the task of tRNA recognition.     

Breaking the stereo barrier of amino acid attachment to tRNA by a single nucleotide

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are responsible for attaching amino acid residues to the tRNA 3'-end. The two classes of synthetases approach tRNA as mirror images, with opposite but symmetrical stereochemistries that allow the class I enzymes to attach amino acid residues to the 2'-hydroxyl group of the terminal ribose, whereas, the class II enzymes attach amino acid residues to the 3'-hydroxyl group. However, we show here that the attachment of cysteine to tRNA(Cys) by the class I cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CysRS) is flexible; the enzyme is capable of using either the 2' or 3'-hydroxyl group as the attachment site. The molecular basis for this flexibility was investigated. Introduction of the nucleotide U73 of tRNA(Cys) into tRNA(Val) was found to confer the flexibility. While valylation of the wild-type tRNA(Val) by the class I ValRS was strictly dependent on the terminal 2'-hydroxyl group, that of the U73 mutant of tRNA(Val) occurred at either the 2' or 3'-hydroxyl group. Thus, the single nucleotide U73 of tRNA has the ability to break the stereo barrier of amino acid attachment to tRNA, by mobilizing the 2' and 3'-hydroxyl groups of A76 in flexible geometry with respect to the tRNA acceptor stem.     

Fidelity in the aminoacylation of tRNA(Val) with hydroxy analogues of valine, leucine, and isoleucine by valyl-tRNA synthetases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli

Several analogues of valine, leucine, and isoleucine carrying hydroxyl groups in the gamma- or delta-position have been tested in the aminoacylation of tRNA by valyl-tRNA synthetases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli. Results of the ATP/PPi exchange and of the aminoacylation reactions indicate that the amino acid analogues not only can form the aminoacyl adenylate intermediate but are also transferred to tRNA. However, the fact that the reaction consumes an excess of ATP indicates that the misactivated amino acid analogue is hydrolytically removed. Thus, valyl-tRNA synthetase from S. cerevisiae shows a high fidelity in forming valyl-tRNA. Although the much bulkier amino acid analogues allo- and iso-gamma-hydroxyvaline and allo- and iso-gamma-hydroxyisoleucine are initially charged to tRNA, the misaminoacylated tRNA(Val) is enzymatically deacylated. This cleavage reaction is mediated by the hydroxyl groups of the amino acid analogues which are converted into the corresponding lactones.     

Function independence of microhelix aminoacylation from anticodon binding in a class I tRNA synthetase.

The monomeric form of the class I Escherichia coli methionine tRNA synthetase has a distinct carboxyl-terminal domain with a segment that interacts with the anticodon of methionine tRNA. This interaction is a major determinant of the specificity and efficiency of aminoacylation. The end of this carboxyl-terminal domain interacts with the amino-terminal Rossman fold that forms the site for amino acid activation. Thus, the carboxyl-terminal end may have evolved in part to integrate anticodon recognition with amino acid activation. We show here that internal deletions that disrupt the anticodon interaction have no effect on the kinetic parameters for amino acid activation. Moreover, an internally deleted enzyme can aminoacylate an RNA microhelix, which is based on the acceptor stem of methionine tRNA, with the same efficiency as the native protein. These results suggest that, in this enzyme, amino acid activation and acceptor helix aminoacylation are functionally integrated and are independent of the anticodon-binding site.     

Amino acid specificity of the transfer RNA species coded for by HeLa cell mitochondrial DNA

The amino acid specificity of the tRNA species coded for by HeLa cell mitochondrial DNA has been investigated by carrying out hybridizations between amino acid-tRNA complexes labeled in the amino acid and separated mitochondrial DNA strands.The results indicate that there are in HeLa cell mitochondria at least 17 distinct tRNA species hybridizable with mitochondrial DNA, which are specific for 16 amino acids. For 14 of the 16 amino acids, amino-acyl-tRNA synthetase activities distinct from the cytoplasmic ones have been detected in mitochondria. The remaining four amino acids (asparagine, glutamine, histidine and proline) have consistently failed to charge to any detectable extent mitochondrial tRNA species hybridizable with mitochondrial DNA.No obvious relationship appears to exist between the amino acids incorporated into tRNAs hybridizable to mitochondrial DNA and the previously observed pattern of chloramphenicol-sensitive amino acid incorporation by HeLa cell mitochondria.     

Amino acid-dependent transfer RNA affinity in a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase

Steady-state and transient kinetic analyses of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) reveal that the enzyme discriminates against noncognate glutamate at multiple steps during the overall aminoacylation reaction. A major portion of the selectivity arises in the amino acid activation portion of the reaction, whereas the discrimination in the overall two-step reaction arises from very weak binding of noncognate glutamate. Further transient kinetics experiments showed that tRNA(Gln) binds to GlnRS approximately 60-fold weaker when noncognate glutamate is present and that glutamate reduces the association rate of tRNA with the enzyme by 100-fold. These findings demonstrate that amino acid and tRNA binding are interdependent and reveal an important additional source of specificity in the aminoacylation reaction. Crystal structures of the GlnRS x tRNA complex bound to either amino acid have previously shown that glutamine and glutamate bind in distinct positions in the active site, providing a structural basis for the amino acid-dependent modulation of tRNA affinity. Together with other crystallographic data showing that ligand binding is essential to assembly of the GlnRS active site, these findings suggest a model for specificity generation in which required induced-fit rearrangements are significantly modulated by the identities of the bound substrates.     

How optimized is the translational machinery in Escherichia coli,Salmonella typhimurium and Saccharomyces cerevisiae?

The optimization of the translational machinery in cells requires the mutual adaptation of codon usage and tRNA concentration, and the adaptation of tRNA concentration to amino acid usage. Two predictions were derived based on a simple deterministic model of translation which assumes that elongation of the peptide chain is rate-limiting. The highest translational efficiency is achieved when the codon recognized by the most abundant tRNA reaches the maximum frequency. For each codon family, the tRNA concentration is optimally adapted to codon usage when the concentration of different tRNA species matches the square-root of the frequency of their corresponding synonymous codons. When tRNA concentration and codon usage are well adapted to each other, the optimal content of all tRNA species carrying the same amino acid should match the square-root of the frequency of the amino acid. These predictions are examined against empirical data from Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.     

A rapid method for determining tRNA charging levels in vivo: analysis of yeast mutants defective in the general control of amino acid biosynthesis.

We describe a simple method to quantitate the intracellular levels of charged tRNA species representing all 20 amino acids. Small RNA species are isolated from yeast cells under conditions where amino acids remain bound to their cognate tRNAs. After chromatographic removal of free amino acids, the tRNAs are discharged, and the amounts of the released amino acids are then quantitated. This method was applied to yeast cells from a wild type strain and from three mutant strains that are defective both in the general control of amino acid biosynthesis and in protein synthesis. Two of these mutant strains, previously shown to be defective in the methionine or isoleucine tRNA synthetases, respectively contain undetectable amounts of charged methionine or isoleucine although their levels of the remaining 19 amino acids are similar to a wild type strain. In contrast, a gcd1 mutant strain has normal levels of all 20 amino-acyl tRNA species. Thus, gcd1 strains are defective in general control of amino acid biosynthesis for reasons other than artifactual starvation of an amino acid due to a failure in tRNA changing.     

Specificity of the ribosomal A site for aminoacyl-tRNAs

Although some experiments suggest that the ribosome displays specificity for the identity of the esterified amino acid of its aminoacyl-tRNA substrate, a study measuring dissociation rates of several misacylated tRNAs containing the GAC anticodon from the A site showed little indication for such specificity. In this article, an expanded set of misacylated tRNAs and two 2′-deoxynucleotide-substituted mRNAs are used to demonstrate the presence of a lower threshold in k_off values for aa-tRNA binding to the A site. When a tRNA binds sufficiently well to reach this threshold, additional stabilizing effects due to the esterified amino acid or changes in tRNA sequence are not observed. However, specificity for different amino acid side chains and the tRNA body is observed when tRNA binding is sufficiently weaker than this threshold. We propose that uniform aa-tRNA binding to the A site may be a consequence of a conformational change in the ribosome, induced by the presence of the appropriate combination of contributions from the anticodon, amino acid and tRNA body.     

LEVEL AND AMINO ACID ACCEPTOR ACTIVITY OF MOUSE BRAIN tRNA DURING NEURAL DEVELOPMENT

Abstract— The level of tRNA in mouse brain tissue was measured at various stages of postnatal development. The amount of tRNA per unit of brain wet weight was little, if at all, altered during the first 22 days after birth and decreased by 26 and 32 per cent by 56 days and maturity, respectively. On a DNA or cellular basis, there was no maturation-dependent decrease in tRNA content. The total amino acid acceptor activity of tRNA for seven different amino acids was measured during neural development. There were considerable differences in the tRNA acceptor activities of individual amino acids within an age group; however on a DNA basis, there was little difference between tRNA preparations obtained from newborn and adult mouse brain tissue. The in vivo levels of aminoacylated-tRNA for the seven amino acids of interest, were measured in brain tissue of 1–, 9–, 34, 70–day-old and adult (over 9 months old) mice. Alterations in tRNA level, total tRNA acceptor activity, for each amino acid, and the levels of in uivo aminoacylation of tRNA were shown to be independent of developmental alterations in brain amino acid pool sizes. The results are discussed with regard to the availability of cellular amino acids for translational events during early mammalian brain development.     

A conserved threonine within Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase prevents hydrolytic editing of leucyl-tRNALeu

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases ensure the fidelity of protein synthesis by accurately selecting and activating cognate amino acids for aminoacylation of the correct tRNA. Some tRNA synthetases have evolved an editing active site that is separate from the amino acid activation site providing two steps or "sieves" for amino acid selection. These two sieves rely on different strategies for amino acid recognition to significantly enhance the accuracy of aminoacylation. We have performed alanine scanning mutagenesis in a conserved threonine-rich region of the Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase's CP1 domain that is hypothesized to contain a putative editing active site. Characterization of purified mutant proteins led to the identification of a single conserved threonine that prevents the cognate leucine amino acid from being hydrolyzed after aminoacylation of the tRNA. Mutation of this threonine to an alanine eliminates discrimination of the cognate amino acid in the editing active site. This provides a molecular example of an amino acid discrimination mechanism in the tRNA synthetase's editing active site.     

Structural bases of transfer RNA-dependent amino acid recognition and activation by glutamyl-tRNA synthetase

Glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) is one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that require the cognate tRNA for specific amino acid recognition and activation. We analyzed the role of tRNA in amino acid recognition by crystallography. In the GluRS*tRNA(Glu)*Glu structure, GluRS and tRNA(Glu) collaborate to form a highly complementary L-glutamate-binding site. This collaborative site is functional, as it is formed in the same manner in pretransition-state mimic, GluRS*tRNA(Glu)*ATP*Eol (a glutamate analog), and posttransition-state mimic, GluRS*tRNA(Glu)*ESA (a glutamyl-adenylate analog) structures. In contrast, in the GluRS*Glu structure, only GluRS forms the amino acid-binding site, which is defective and accounts for the binding of incorrect amino acids, such as D-glutamate and L-glutamine. Therefore, tRNA(Glu) is essential for formation of the completely functional binding site for L-glutamate. These structures, together with our previously described structures, reveal that tRNA plays a crucial role in accurate positioning of both L-glutamate and ATP, thus driving the amino acid activation.     

Transiently misacylated tRNA is a primer for editing of misactivated adenylates by class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

The genetic code depends on amino acid fine structure discrimination by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. For isoleucyl- (IleRS) and valyl-tRNA synthetases (ValRS), reactions that hydrolyze misactivated noncognate amino acids help to achieve high accuracy in aminoacylation. Two editing pathways contribute to aminoacylation fidelity: pretransfer and post-transfer. In pretransfer editing, the misactivated amino acid is hydrolyzed as an aminoacyl adenylate, while in post-transfer editing a misacylated tRNA is deacylated. Both reactions are dependent on a tRNA cofactor and require translocation to a site located approximately 30 A from the site of amino acid activation. Using a series of 3'-end modified tRNAs that are deficient in either aminoacylation, deacylation, or both, total editing (the sum of pre- and post-transfer editing) was shown to require both aminoacylation and deacylation activities. These and additional results with IleRS are consistent with a post-transfer deacylation event initiating formation of an editing-active enzyme/tRNA complex. In this state, the primed complex processively edits misactivated valyl-adenylate via the pretransfer route. Thus, misacylated tRNA is an obligatory intermediate for editing by either pathway.     

A statistical method for correlating tRNA sequence with amino acid specificity.

A statistical method for finding the nucleotide positions in tRNA sequences that correlate with amino acid specificity has been developed. The procedure involves finding the subset of nucleotide positions and groups of positions where the marginal density of one amino acid tRNA class does not overlap that of any other amino acid class. The procedure is an application of a statistical method known as the Expectation Maximization algorithm.     

Eukaryotic tRNA sequences present conserved and amino acid-specific structural signatures

Metazoan organisms have many tRNA genes responsible for decoding amino acids. The set of all tRNA genes can be grouped in sets of common amino acids and isoacceptor tRNAs that are aminoacylated by corresponding aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Analysis of tRNA alignments shows that, despite the high number of tRNA genes, specific tRNA sequence motifs are highly conserved across multicellular eukaryotes. The conservation often extends throughout the isoacceptors and isodecoders with, in some cases, two sets of conserved isodecoders. This study is focused on non-Watson–Crick base pairs in the helical stems, especially GoU pairs. Each of the four helical stems may contain one or more conserved GoU pairs. Some are amino acid specific and could represent identity elements for the cognate aminoacyl tRNA synthetases. Other GoU pairs are found in more than a single amino acid and could be critical for native folding of the tRNAs. Interestingly, some GoU pairs are anticodon-specific, and others are found in phylogenetically-specific clades. Although the distribution of conservation likely reflects a balance between accommodating isotype-specific functions as well as those shared by all tRNAs essential for ribosomal translation, such conservations may indicate the existence of specialized tRNAs for specific translation targets, cellular conditions, or alternative functions.     

The Seryl-tRNA synthetase/tRNA acceptor stem interface is mediated via a specific network of water molecules

tRNAs are aminoacylated by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. There are at least 20 natural amino acids, but due to the redundancy of the genetic code, 64 codons on the mRNA. Therefore, there exist tRNA isoacceptors that are aminoacylated with the same amino acid, but differ in their sequence and in the anticodon. tRNA identity elements, which are sequence or structure motifs, assure the amino acid specificity. The Seryl-tRNA synthetase is an enzyme that depends on rather few and simple identity elements in tRNA^Ser. The Seryl-tRNA-synthetase interacts with the tRNA^Ser acceptor stem, which makes this part of the tRNA a valuable structural element for investigating motifs of the protein–RNA complex. We solved the high resolution crystal structures of two tRNA^Ser acceptor stem microhelices and investigated their interaction with the Seryl-tRNA-synthetase by superposition experiments. The results presented here show that the amino acid side chains Ser151 and Ser156 of the synthetase are interacting in a very similar way with the RNA backbone of the microhelix and that the involved water molecules have almost identical positions within the tRNA/synthetase interface.     

Aminoacylation of RNA Minihelices: Implications for tRNA Synthetase Structural Design and Evolution

Abstract

The genetic code is based on the aminoacylation of tRNA with amino acids catalyzed by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. The synthetases are constructed from discrete domains and all synthetases possess a core catalytic domain that catalyzes amino acid activation, binds the acceptor stem of tRNA, and transfers the amino acid to tRNA. Fused to the core domain are additional domains that mediate RNA interactions distal to the acceptor stem. Several synthetases catalyze the aminoacylation of RNA oligonucleotide substrates that recreate only the tRNA acceptor stems. In one case, a relatively small catalytic domain catalyzes the aminoacylation of these substrates independent of the rest of the protein. Thus, the active site domain may represent a primordial synthetase in which polypeptide insertions that mediate RNA acceptor stem interactions are tightly integrated with determinants for aminoacyl adenylate synthesis. The relationship between nucleotide sequences in small RNA oligonucleotides and the specific amino acids that are attached to these oligonucleotides could constitute a second genetic code.