Green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter gene for the plant pathogenic oomycete Phytophthora palmivora

Transgenic Phytophthora palmivora strains that produce green fluorescent protein (GFP) or beta-glucuronidase (GUS) constitutively were obtained after stable DNA integration using a polyethylene-glycol and CaCl2-based transformation protocol. GFP and GUS production were monitored during several stages of the life cycle of P. palmivora to evaluate their use in molecular and physiological studies. 40% of the GFP transformants produced the GFP to a level detectable by a confocal laser scanning microscope, whereas 75% of the GUS transformants produced GUS. GFP could be visualised readily in swimming zoospores and other developmental stages of P. palmivora cells. For high magnification microscopic studies, GFP is better visualised and was superior to GUS. In contrast, for macroscopic examination, GUS was superior. Our findings indicate that both GFP and GUS can be used successfully as reporter genes in P. palmivora.     

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a new vital marker in the phytopathogenic fungusUstilago maydis

Pathogenic development ofUstilago maydis, the causative agent of corn smut disease, is a multistep process. Compatible yeast-like cells fuse and this generates the infectious dikaryon which grows filamentously. Having entered the plant the dikaryon induces tumors in its host in which massive proliferation of fungal material, karyogamy and spore formation occur. In order to follow fungal development from the initial steps to the final stage we have expressed the green fluorescent protein (GFP) fromAequorea victoria as a vital marker inU. maydis and demonstrate that GFP-tagged strains can be used to study host-pathogen interactions in vivo.     

The green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a vital screenable marker in rice transformation

 An engineered green fluorescent protein (GFP) from the jellyfish Aequora victoria was used to develop a facile and rapid rice transformation system using particle bombardment of immature embryos. The mgfp4 gene under the control of the 35s Cauliflower Mosaic Virus promoter produced bright-green fluorescence easily detectable and screenable in rice tissue 12–22 days after bombardment. Visual screening of transformed rice tissue, associated with a low level of antibiotic selection, drastically reduced the quantity of tissue to be handled and the time required for the recovery of transformed plants. GFP expression was observed in primary transformed rice plants (T₀) and their progeny (T₁). We describe various techniques to observe GFP in vitro and in vivo. The advantages of this new screenable marker in rice genetic engineering programmes are discussed. Received: 6 October 1997 / Accepted: 9 October 1997     

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a marker during pollen development

The transient expression of three mutant forms of green fluorescent protein (GFP) genes, GFP4, GFP5ER, and GFP4S65C, under several constitutive and pollenspecific promoters throughout pollen development in Nicotianatabacum, thaliana and Antirrhinummajus is described. Immature pollen of tobacco, Arabidopsis and snapdragon, isolated at different developmental stages, were bombarded with plasmids containing the GFP and cultured in vitro for several days until maturity. The expression of GFP was monitored every day during in vitro maturation, germination and pollination, as well as after in situ pollination. The expression pattern of each construct was compared in parallel experiments to that of ßglucuronidase (GUS) constructs expressed by the same promoters. The results show that the expression level of all three GFP mutant forms was dependent on the strength of the promoter used. The strongest promoter was the DC3 promoter, and no notable differences in the intensity and brightness of all three versions of GFP were observed. GFPexpressing pollen from tobacco and snapdragon developed in vitro for several days until maturity and germinated in vitro as well as on the surface of stigmata, strongly suggesting that all three GFPs are not toxic for the development of functional pollen. Furthermore, stably transformed tobacco plants expressing GFP under the control of the strong pollenexpressed DC3 and LAT52 promoters were not impaired in reproductive function, confirming that GFP can be used as a nondestructive marker for plant reproductive biology and development.     

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a direct biosensor for mutation detection: elimination of false-negative errors in target gene expression

A new method was developed to determine the mutagenic efficacy of a suspected mutagen by employing green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a direct biosensor for mutation detection. Alterations in target gene (AcGFP1) expression after mutagen [(±)-7p,8a-dihydroxy-9a,10a-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene (BPDE)] treatment were measured to detect the mutagenic efficacy of the carcinogen. In contrast to mutagen treatment of the entire plasmid or cell culture, the target AcGFP1gene devoid of the plasmid backbone was exposed to BPDE (10–500 μM) to eliminate the need for an additional fusion gene. Shuttle vectors (pAcGFP-N1) were religated to the AcGFP1 gene with BPDE adducts (0–8.59 μM) and replicated in the eukaryotic host. This approach eliminated false-negative errors in target gene expression that arose from BPDE adduct formation in the residual plasmid backbone rather than in the AcGFP1 gene. Determination of the BPDE–AcGFP1 adducts allowed the quantitative mutagenic effect of the BPDE adducts on AcGFP1 gene expression to be monitored. The results obtained with flow cytometry and confocal microscopy validate our method and demonstrate efficient and direct use of GFP as a biosensor for mutation detection.     

Green fluorescent protein is superior to blue fluorescent protein as a quantitative reporter of promoter activity in <Emphasis Type=Italic>E. coli</Emphasis>

Fluorescent proteins related to and derived from green fluorescent protein (GFP) are widely used as tools for investigating a wide range of biological processes. In particular, GFP and its relatives have been used extensively as qualitative reporters of gene expression in many different organisms, but relatively few studies have investigated fluorescent proteins as quantitative reporters of gene expression. GFP has some limitations as a reporter gene, including possible toxicity when expressed at high levels. Therefore, it would be useful if other fluorescent proteins could be identified for use as quantitative reporters. Toward this end, we investigated BFP as a quantitative reporter of promoter activity in E. coli and directly compared it with GFPuv using a set of well-characterized synthetic constitutive promoters. The fluorescence produced in E. coli strains expressing GFPuv or BFP grown on solid medium was quantified using a CCD camera and fluorimetry. GFPuv consistently gave more reliable and statistically significant results than did BFP in all assays. Correspondingly, we found that the signal-to-noise ratio for GFPuv fluorescence is substantially higher than for BFP. We conclude that, under the conditions assessed in this study, GFPuv is superior to BFP as a quantitative reporter of promoter activity in E. coli. J. Bayes, M. Calvey, L. Reineke, A. Colagiavanni, and M. Tscheiner made equivalent contributions to this work.     

Green fluorescent protein as a screenable marker to increase the efficiency of generating transgenic woody fruit plants

 The green fluorescent protein (GFP) from Aequorea victoria has been introduced into three different citrus genotypes [Citrus aurantium L., C. aurantifolia (Christm.) Swing. and C. sinensis L. Osbeck×Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.] which are considered recalcitrant to transformation, mainly due to low transformation frequencies and to the regeneration of escape shoots at high frequencies from the Agrobacterium-inoculated explants. High-level GFP expression was detected in transgenic cells, tissues and plants. Using GFP as a vital marker has allowed us to localize the sites of transgene expression in specific cells, always occurring in callus tissue formed from the cambium of the cut ends of explants. Whereas green fluorescent shoots regenerated in all cases from this callus, most escapes regenerated directly from explants with almost no callus formation. Thus, development of callus from cambium is a prerequisite for citrus transformation. Furthermore, in vivo monitoring of GFP expression permitted a rapid and easy discrimination of transgenic and escape shoots. The selection of transgenic shoots could be easily favored by eliminating the escapes and/or by performing shoot-tip grafting of the transgenic buds soon after their origin. GFP-expressing shoots have also been observed in citrus explants co-cultivated with Agrobacterium but cultured in a medium without the selective agent kanamycin. This opens the possibility to rescue the transgenic sectors and to regenerate transgenic plants without using selectable marker genes conferring antibiotic or herbicide resistance, which is currently a topic of much discussion for the commercialization of transgenic plants. Received: 28 October 1998 / Accepted: 28 November 1998     

Green fluorescent protein as a visual marker for wheat transformation

 Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) transformation via particle bombardment is now established in many laboratories, but transformation efficiencies are still largely low and the highest efficiencies can only be obtained with certain genotypes. For rapid optimization and improvement of wheat transformation protocols, a non-destructive marker which permits early detection of transformed cells is needed. We have assessed the ability of a modified version of the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein (GFP) to act as a marker for detecting transformed cells and tissues of wheat. Multicellular clusters emitting green fluorescence were observed 14 days after particle bombardment with a sGFPS65T gene construct, and gfp-expressing shoots (often with expressing roots) could be observed as early as 21 days after bombardment. These shoots can be removed from the callus and grown further until they are ready to transfer to soil. Transgenic wheat plants could be selected on the basis of gfp expression alone although the inclusion of antibiotic resistance as a selectable marker could improve the efficiency. Using sgfpS65T as a marker gene in an experiment comparing bombardment parameters allowed the rapid identification of variables that could be targeted for optimization. Received: 29 March 2000 / Accepted: 29 March 2000     

GFP在绿色荧光裸鼠不同组织中的表达及分析

目的研究外源绿色荧光蛋白（green fluorescent protein,简称GFP）基因在BALB/c绿色荧光裸鼠主要器官组织中的表达及其差异。方法小动物成像系统和RT-PCR方法检测GFP的组织分布以及荧光表达水平情况。结果经活体荧光影像系统观察及PCR方法检测发现GFP可以在裸鼠多个器官组织中表达,其中在胰腺、心脏、全脑、皮肤、睾丸中表达量较高。结论外源绿色荧光蛋白可以在模型动物体内成功表达且稳定遗传,其中在胰腺组织中高表达。     

Green fluorescent protein as a visual marker in a p-nitrophenol degrading Moraxella sp.

The green fluorescent protein gene (gfp) was introduced into a p-nitrophenol-metabolizing strain of Moraxella sp. by chromosomal integration. The gfp-marked transformants, designated Moraxella sp. strains G21 and G25, exhibited green fluorescence under UV light. Molecular characterization by PCR and Southern hybridization showed the presence of gfp in both transformants. Both transformants and the parent strain degraded 720 μM of p-nitrophenol with nitrite release within 4 h after inoculation in minimal medium supplemented with yeast extract. Transformants degraded up to 1440 μM p-nitrophenol and mineralized about 60% of 720 μM p-nitrophenol, both in broth and in soil, to the same extent as the parent strain. Insertion of gfp did not adversely affect the expression of p-nitrophenol-degrading genes in the transformants. Survival studies indicated that individual green fluorescent colonies of transformants can be detected up to 2 weeks after inoculation in soil. These marked strains could be of value in studies on microbial survival in the environment.     

Green fluorescent protein as a vital marker for non-destructive detection of transformation events in transgenic plants

Transformation of plants is a popular tool for modifying various desirable traits. Marker genes, like those encoding for bacterial β-glucuronidase (GUS), firefly luciferase (LUC) or jellyfish green fluorescent protein (GFP) have been shown to be very useful for establishing of efficient transformation protocols. Due to favourable properties such as no need of exogenous substrates and easy visualization, GFP has been found to be superior in to other markers in many cases. However, the use of GFP fluorescence is associated with some obstacles, mostly related to the diminishing of green fluorescence in older tissues, variation in fluorescence levels among different tissues and organs, and occasional interference with other fluorescing compounds in plants. This paper briefly summarizes basic GFP properties and applications, and describes in more detail the contribution of GFP to the establishment, evaluation and improvement of transformation procedures for plants. Moreover, features and possible obstacles associated with monitoring GFP fluorescence are discussed.     

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a new vital marker in the phytopathogenic fungusUstilago maydis

Pathogenic development ofUstilago maydis, the causative agent of corn smut disease, is a multistep process. Compatible yeast-like cells fuse and this generates the infectious dikaryon which grows filamentously. Having entered the plant the dikaryon induces tumors in its host in which massive proliferation of fungal material, karyogamy and spore formation occur. In order to follow fungal development from the initial steps to the final stage we have expressed the green fluorescent protein (GFP) fromAequorea victoria as a vital marker inU. maydis and demonstrate that GFP-tagged strains can be used to study host-pathogen interactions in vivo.     

Expression of the red fluorescent protein DsRed-Express in filamentous ascomycete fungi

The recently reported red fluorescent protein DsRed from the reef coral Discosoma sp. represents a new marker that has been codon-optimized for high expression in mammalian cells. To facilitate expression of DsRed in ascomycete fungi, we used the clone pDsRed-Express (Clontech) for constructing a plasmid vector, pPgpd-DsRed, containing the constitutive Aspergillus nidulans glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (gpd) promoter. This vector was used for co-transformation of Penicillium paxilli, Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma virens (syn. Gliocladium virens) together with either pAN7-1 or gGFP, both containing a gene for hygromycin resistance for transformant selection. In addition, gGFP contains a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene for expression in Ascomycetes. Expression of DsRed-Express was obtained in all three fungi, indicating that DsRed can be used as a highly effective vital marker in Ascomycetes. Dual marked transformants expressed both DsRed-Express and GFP in the same mycelium and were used for non-quantitative comparison of the intensity of the fluorescence using confocal laser scanning microscopy.     

Use of green fluorescent protein for detection of transformed shoots and homozygous offspring

 Using tobacco as a model system, the data obtained demonstrated that the green fluorescent protein (GFP) can be used as a visual selection marker for transformed tissues. Based on differences in the intensity of GFP fluorescence, homozygous and hemizygous states could be easily visualized in seeds and seedlings of the T1 generation. These results were confirmed by genetic analysis. Optimized conditions for GFP analysis of stable transformants are presented. Received: 9 February 1999 / Revision received: 26 April 1999 / Accepted: 19 May 1999     

Optimization of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression from a lactose-inducible promoter in Lactobacillus casei

An expression vector for Lactobacillus casei has been constructed containing the inducible lac promoter and the gene encoding ultraviolet visible green fluorescent protein (GFP(UV)) as reporter. Different conditions to grow L. casei were assayed and fluorescence as well as total protein synthesized were quantified. The maintenance of neutral pH had the greatest incidence on GFP(UV) expression, followed by aeration and a temperature of 30 degrees C. Environmental factors favoring GFP(UV) accumulation did not exactly correlate with those enhancing fluorescence. Therefore, oxygenation, by stirring the culture, had the greatest influence on the proportion of fluorescent protein, which is in accordance with the structural requirements of this protein. The highest yield obtained was 1.3 microg of GFP per mg of total protein, from which 55% was fluorescent.     

Green fluorescent protein as a visual selection marker for papaya (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Carica papaya</Emphasis> L.) transformation

Chemical-based selection for plant transformation is associated with a number of real and perceived problems that might be avoided through visual selection. We have used green fluorescent protein (GFP), as a visual selectable marker to produce transformed papaya (Carica papaya) plants following microprojectile bombardment of embryogenic callus. GFP selection reduced the selection time from 3 months on a geneticin (G418) antibiotic-containing medium to 3–4 weeks. Moreover, GFP selection increased the number of transformed papaya plants by five-to eightfold compared to selection in the presence of antibiotics. Overall, the use of GFP for selecting transgenic papaya lines improved our throughput for transformation by 15- to 24-fold while avoiding the drawbacks associated with the use of antibiotic resistance-based selection markers.Abbreviations BA: Benzyladenine - 2, 4-D: 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid - GFP: Green fluorescent protein - IBA: Indole-3-butyric acid - NAA: -Naphthaleneacetic acid - MS: Murashige and Skoog plant culture mediumCommunicated by R.J. Rose     

Green fluorescent protein/β-galactosidase double reporters for visualizing Drosophila gene expression patterns

We characterized 120 novel yeast Ga14-targeted enhancer trap lines in Drosophila using upstream activating sequence (UAS) reporter plasmids incorporating newly constructed fusions of Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein (GFP) and Escherichia coli β-galactosidase genes. Direct comparisons of GFP epifluorescence and β-galactosidase staining revealed that both proteins function comparably to their unconjugated counterparts within a wide variety of Drosophila tissues. Generally, both reporters accumulated in similar patterns within individual lines, but in some tissues, e.g., brain, GFP staining was more reliable than that of β-galactosidase, whereas in other tissues, most notably testes and ovaries, the converse was true. In cases of weak enhancers, we occasionally could detect β-galactosidase staining in the absence of discernible GFP fluorescence. This shortcoming of GFP can, in most cases, be alleviated by using the more efficient S65T GFP derivative. The GFP/β-gal reporter fusion protein facilitated monitoring several aspects of protein accumulation. In particular, the ability to visualize GFP fluorescence enhances recognition of global static and dynamic patterns in live animals, whereas β-galactosidase histochemistry affords sensitive high resolution protein localization. We present a catalog of Ga14-expressing strains that will be useful for investigating several aspects of Drosophila melanogaster cell and developmental biology. Dev. Genet. 20:338–347, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression patterns in the olfactory epithelium of GFP transgenic cloned Jinhua pigs

Domestic pigs possess a well‐developed sense of smell. However, the morphology of the porcine olfactory epithelium (OE) is poorly understood. Recently, several strains of transgenic cloned pigs that are presumed to ubiquitously express green fluorescent protein (GFP) have been created. Thus, the purpose of this study was to elucidate the features of porcine OE using the tissues of GFP transgenic cloned pigs. Based on observations of Hematoxylin and Eosin staining and measurements of thickness, porcine OE tissue portions were classified into three categories (thick, standard, and thin). Cryosections revealed that the prominent GFP signals were expressed in olfactory sensory neurons (OSN), Bowman's glands, and olfactory nerve. A few GFP‐expressing sustentacular cells were seen; however, the intensity of GFP fluorescence was slight. In the thick portion, numerous GFP‐expressing polygonal OSN that did not possess dendrites were found. In the standard portions, GFP‐expressing cells had longitudinal dendrites. A few GFP‐expressing cells were found in the thin portion. In the thick and standard portions, most of the prominent GFP‐expressing cells were positive for olfactory marker protein. Moreover, double immunofluorescence staining with boiled GFP and Sox2 antibody revealed that GFP expression patterns in OSN are synchronized with Sox2 immunoreactive patterns.