The NH(2)-terminal transmembrane and lumenal domains of LGP85 are needed for the formation of enlarged endosomes/lysosomes

LGP85 is a lysosomal membrane protein possessing a type III topology and is also known as a member of the CD36 superfamily of proteins, such as CD36 and the scavenger-receptor BI (SR-BI). We have recently demonstrated that overexpression of LGP85 in various mammalian cell lines causes the enlargement of endosomal/lysosomal compartments (ELCs). Using chimeras and deletion mutants, we show here that the lumenal region of LGP85 is necessary, but not sufficient, for the development of ELCs. Effective formation of enlarged ELC was largely dependent on the presence of a preceding NH₂-terminal transmembrane segment. Analyses of deletion mutants within the lumenal domain further revealed a requirement of the NH₂-terminal transmembrane proximal lumenal region, with high sequence similarity with SR-BI for the enlargement of ELC. These results suggest that an interaction of the NH₂-terminal transmembrane proximal lumenal domain of LGP85 with the inner leaflet of endosomal/lysosomal membranes through the connection with the transmembrane domain is an essential determinant for the regulation of endosomal/lysosomal membrane traffic. Interestingly, although the NH₂-terminal transmembrane domain itself was not sufficient for the enlargement of ELCs, it appeared to be required for direct targeting of LGP85 from the trans -Golgi network to late endosomes/lysosomes. Taken together, these results indicate the involvement of distinct domain of LGP85 in the targeting to, and biogenesis and maintenance of, ELC.     

Ile (476), a constituent of di-leucine-based motif of a major lysosomal membrane protein,LGP85/LIMP II,is important for its proper distribution in late endosomes and lysosomes

Lysosomal membrane glycoprotein termed LGP85 or LIMP II extends a COOH-terminal cytoplasmic tail of R459GQGSMDEGTADERAPLIRT478, in which an L475 I476 sequence lies as a di-leucine-based motif for lysosomal targeting. In the present study, we explored the role of the I476 residue in the localization of LGP85 to the endocytic organelles using two substitution mutants called I476A and I476L in which alanine and leucine are replaced at I476, respectively, and I476R477T478-deleted LGP85 called Delta 476-478. Immunofluorescence analyses showed that I476A and I476L are largely colocalized in intracellular organelles with an endogenous late endosomal and lysosomal marker, LAMP-1, but there were some granules in which staining for the LGP85 mutants was prominent, while Delta 476-478 is detected in LAMP-1-positive and LAMP-1-negative intracellular organelles, and on the cell surface. The subcellular fractionation studies revealed that I476A, I476L, and Delta 476-478 are different from wild-type LGP85 in the distribution of early endosomes, late endosomes, and lysosomes. I476A and I476L are present more in late endosomes than in the densest lysosomes, whereas wild-type LGP85 is mainly lysosomal. Substitution of I476 for A and L differentially modified the ratios of late endosomal to lysosomal LGP85. A major portion of Delta 476-478 resided in the light buoyant density fraction containing plasma membrane and early endosomes. Taken together, these results indicate that the existence of the 476th amino acid residue is essential for localization of LGP85 to late endocytic compartments. The fact that isoleucine but not leucine is in the 476th position is especially of importance in the proper distribution of LGP85 in late endosomes and lysosomes.     

A study on the renaturation of membrane proteins after solubilization in SDS or following polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in SDS,with special reference to a phosphatase from acholeplasma laidlawii

It may be easier to renature SDS-denatured hydrophobic proteins than to renature SDS-denatured water-soluble proteins. This paper presents some support for this hypothesis in the form of literature reports and an experiment of our own with an intrinsic membrane protein (a phosphatase from Acholeplasma laidlawii), that could be completely renatured, to judge from the restored activity, which was equal to (or higher than) that of the untreated enzyme. If this hypothesis is correct it might be possible to devise general methods to reverse the SDS denaturation of hydrophobic membrane proteins. This would be a breakthrough in the purification of at least some membrane proteins, because the high-resolving polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in SDS could then be used to prepare membrane proteins in a native state. The method used for the renaturation of the SDS-denatured, entirely inactive, phosphatase comprised removal of SDS with the aid of conventional dialysis against a buffer containing the neutral, very efficient and non ultraviolet light-absorbing detergent G3707. For renaturation of the enzyme following an SDS-electrophoresis in polyacrylamide the gel was immersed in the same buffer for several hours; by staining for phosphatase the enzyme could easily be localized in the gel in the form of a yellow band, coinciding with a protein zone.