Filopodia initiation

Filopodia are long, slender, actin-rich cellular protrusions, which recently have become a focus of cell biology research because of their proposed roles as sensory and exploratory organelles that allow for “intelligent” cell behavior. Actin nucleation, elongation and bundling are believed to be essential for filopodia formation and functions. However, the identity of actin filament nucleators responsible for the initiation of filopodia remains controversial. Two alternative models, the convergent elongation and tip nucleation, emphasize two different actin filament nucleators, the Arp2/3 complex or formins, respectively, as key players during filopodia initiation. Although these two models in principle are not mutually exclusive, it is important to understand which of them is actually employed by cells. In this review, we discuss the existing evidence regarding the relative roles of the Arp2/3 complex and formins in filopodia initiation.     

Cell-cycle-specific initiation of replication

The following characteristics are relevant when replication of chromosomes and plasmids is discussed in relation to the cell cycle: the timing or replication, the selection of molecules for replication, and the coordination of multiple initiation events within a single cell cycle. Several fundamentally different methods have been used to study these processes: Meselson—Stahl density-shift experiments, experiments with the so-called‘baby machine', sorting of cells according to size, and flow cytometry. The evidence for precise timing and co-ordination of chromosome replication in Escherichia coli is overwhelming. Similarly, the high-copy-number plasmid ColE1 and the low-copy-number plasmids R1/R100 without any doubt replicate randomly throughout the cell cycle. Data about the low-copy-number plasmids F and P1 are conflicting. This calls for new types of experiments and for a better understanding of how these plasmids control their replication and partitioning.     

Control of initiation of sporulation by replication initiation genes in Bacillus subtilis

Initiation of spore formation in Bacillus subtilis appears to depend on initiation of DNA replication. This regulation was first identified using a temperature-sensitive mutation in dnaB. We found that mutations in the replication initiation genes dnaA and dnaD also inhibit sporulation, indicating that inhibition of sporulation is triggered by general defects in the function of replication initiation proteins.     

Ancestral sporulation initiation

Members of the classes Bacilli and Clostridia are able to form endospores, with clostridia representing the ancestral phylogenetic line. In contrast to Bacillus subtilis, the process of sporulation initiation at the molecular level is less well understood in Clostridium acetobutylicum, the model organism of the clostridia. Especially the question of how the master regulator of sporulation, Spo0A, becomes phosphorylated, remained unsolved so far. Steiner et al. now provide compelling genetic and biochemical evidence for two different pathways of direct phosphorylation of Spo0A in C. acetobutylicum by three orphan sensor kinases. Cac0903 and Cac3319 act together, while the other pathway is only dependent on Cac0323. Abortion of sporulation initiation can be achieved by a kinase-like protein, Cac0437.     

Bypassing translation initiation

A high-resolution cryo-EM reconstruction of a ribosome-bound dicistrovirus IRES (Schüler et al., 2006) and the crystal structure of its ribosome binding domain (Pfingsten et al., 2006) provide new insights into an exceptional eukaryotic translation mechanism.     

Effect of polypeptide initiation factors on the spermidine stimulation of initiation complex formation

The AUG- and MS2 RNA-dependent fMet-tRNA binding to 30S ribosomal subunits was stimulated by spermidine with any individual or combination of initiation factors capable of participating in the formation of an initiation complex. When 70S ribosomes were used instead of 30S ribosomal subunits, IF-3 was necessary for spermidine stimulation of the complex formation.     

How initiation factors tune the rate of initiation of protein synthesis in bacteria

The kinetics of initiator transfer RNA (tRNA) interaction with the messenger RNA (mRNA)-programmed 30S subunit and the rate of 50S subunit docking to the 30S preinitiation complex were measured for different combinations of initiation factors in a cell-free Escherichia coli system for protein synthesis with components of high purity. The major results are summarized by a Michaelis-Menten scheme for initiation. All three initiation factors are required for maximal efficiency (kcat/KM) of initiation and for maximal in vivo rate of initiation at normal concentration of initiator tRNA. Spontaneous release of IF3 from the 30S preinitiation complex is required for subunit docking. The presence of initiator tRNA on the 30S subunit greatly increases the rate of 70S ribosome formation by increasing the rate of IF3 dissociation from the 30S subunit and the rate of 50S subunit docking to the IF3-free 30S preinitiation complex. The reasons why IF1 and IF3 are essential in E. coli are discussed in the light of the present observations.     

Function of initiation factor 1 in the binding and release of initiation factor 2 from ribosomal initiation complexes in Escherichia coli.

1. Studies on the function of initiation factor 1 (IF-1) in the formation of 30 S initiation complexes have been carried out. IF-1 appears to prevent the dissociation of initiation factor 2 (IF-2) from the 30 S initiation complex. The factor has no effect on either the initial binding of IF-2 nor does it increase the amount of IF-2 dependent fMet-tRNA and GTP bound to the 30 S subunit. Bound fMet-tRNA remains stable to sucrose gradient centrifugation even in the absence of IF-1. 2. It is postulated that the presence of IF-2 on the 30 S complex is necessary so that at the time of junction with the 50 S subunit to form a 70 S complex, the 70 S-dependent GTPase activity of IF-2 can hydrolyze GTP. This hydrolysis provides a means by which GTP can be removed to facilitate formation of a 70 S initiation complex active in peptidyl transfer. In support of this postulate, it was observed that 30 S initiation complexes formed in the absence of IF-1 could be depleted of their complexes were still able to accept 50 S subunits to form 70 S complexes which could still donate fMet-tRNA into peptide linkages. These results indicate that 30 S complexes lacking GTP do not require IF-2 for formation of active 70 S complexes. 3. IF-1, which is required to prevent dissociation of IF-2 from the 30 S initiation complex, is also required for release of IF-2 from ribosomes following 70 S initiation complex formation. The mechanisms of the release of IF-2 has been studied in greater detail. Evidence is presented which rules out the presence of a stable IF-2 GDP complex on the surface of the 70 S ribosome following GTP hydrolysis and of any exchange reactions between IF-1 and guanine nucleotides necessary for effecting the release of IF-2. IF-2 remains on the 70 S initiation complexes after release of guanine nucleotides and can be liberated solely by addition of IF-1.     

Sulfolobus solfataricus translation initiation factor 1 stimulates translation initiation complex formation

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1 binds to the ribosome during translation initiation. It is instrumental for initiator-tRNA and mRNA binding, and has a function in selection of the authentic start codon. Here, we show that the archaeal homolog aIF1 has analogous functions. The aIF1 protein of the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus is bound to the small ribosomal subunit during translation initiation and accelerates binding of initiator-tRNA and mRNA to the ribosome. Accordingly, aIF1 stimulated translation of an mRNA in a S. solfataricus in vitro translation system. Moreover, this study suggested that the C terminus of the factor is of relevance for its function.     

Canonical eukaryotic initiation factors determine initiation of translation by internal ribosomal entry.

Translation of picornavirus RNA is initiated after ribosomal binding to an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) within the 5' untranslated region. We have reconstituted IRES-mediated initiation on encephalomyocarditis virus RNA from purified components and used primer extension analysis to confirm the fidelity of 48S preinitiation complex formation. Eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), eIF3, and eIF4F were required for initiation; eIF4B and to a lesser extent the pyrimidine tract-binding protein stimulated this process. We show that eIF4F binds to the IRES in a novel cap-independent manner and suggest that cap- and IRES-dependent initiation mechanisms utilize different modes of interaction with this factor to promote ribosomal attachment to mRNA.     

The roles of initiation factor 2 and guanosine triphosphate in initiation of protein synthesis

The role of IF2 from Escherichia coli was studied in vitro using a system for protein synthesis with purified components. Stopped flow experiments with light scattering show that IF2 in complex with guanosine triphosphate (GTP) or a non-cleavable GTP analogue (GDPNP), but not with guanosine diphosphate (GDP), promotes fast association of ribosomal subunits during initiation. Biochemical experiments show that IF2 promotes fast formation of the first peptide bond in the presence of GTP, but not GDPNP or GDP, and that IF2-GDPNP binds strongly to post-initiation ribosomes. We conclude that the GTP form of IF2 accelerates formation of the 70S ribosome from subunits and that GTP hydrolysis accelerates release of IF2 from the 70S ribosome. The results of a recent report, suggesting that GTP and GDP promote initiation equally fast, have been addressed. Our data, indicating that eIF5B and IF2 have similar functions, are used to rationalize the phenotypes of GTPase-deficient mutants of eIF5B and IF2.     

The initiation of Phaeocystis colonies

This study was designed to elucidate the sequence of eventsthat leads to the formation of new colonies of Phaeocystis sp.(strain PCC 540) starting from single cells released from maturecolonies. Colonies were first isolated by filtration onto a10 µm mesh. Colonial cells were then liberated by shakingand inoculated into individual culture wells containing mediumwith a PO₄^2– concentration of {small tilde}1 µM.Cell size and shape were determined daily by image analysis,while chlorophyll and DNA distributions were estimated by flowcytometry. Released cells were non-flagellated and mostly locatedin the G₁ phase of the cell cycle. They developed flagella andup to 90% became motile within 24 h. Swarmers lost motilityrapidly, became elongated, began to cycle again, excreted amucilaginous compound and divided leading to new colonies withina few days. During this reproducible process, no change of ploidycould be observed. Colonies initially adhered to the bottomof culture wells. Frequent mixing drastically reduced the fractionof colonies produced and their volume. High initial PO₄^2–concentrations (5 µM) delayed colony appearance, whereaslow concentrations (0.3 µM) prevented colony formation.The two main conclusions of this study are: (i) under favorableconditions ({small tilde}1 µM PO₄^2– no mixing),a large percentage of released colonial cells give back coloniesafter going through a flagellated stage; (ii) sexuality doesnot appear to be involved in this process. ¹Present address: CREMA BP 5, F-17137 L'Houmeau, France