Active site model for gamma-aminobutyrate aminotransferase explains substrate specificity and inhibitor reactivities.

A homology model for the pig isozyme of the pyridoxal phosphate-dependent enzyme gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) aminotransferase has been built based mainly on the structure of dialkylglycine decarboxylase and on a multiple sequence alignment of 28 evolutionarily related enzymes. The proposed active site structure is presented and analyzed. Hypothetical structures for external aldimine intermediates explain several characteristics of the enzyme. In the GABA external aldimine model, the pro-S proton at C4 of GABA, which abstracted in the 1,3-azaallylic rearrangement interconverting the aldimine and ketimine intermediates, is oriented perpendicular to the plane of the pyridoxal phosphate ring. Lys 329 is in close proximity and is probably the general base catalyst for the proton transfer reaction. The carboxylate group of GABA interacts with Arg 192 and Lys 203, which determine the specificity of the enzyme for monocarboxylic omega-amino acids such as GABA. In the proposed structure for the L-glutamate external aldimine, the alpha-carboxylate interacts with Arg 445. Glu 265 is proposed to interact with this same arginine in the GABA external aldimine, enabling the enzyme to act on omega-amino acids in one half-reaction and on alpha-amino acids in the other. The reactivities of inhibitors are well explained by the proposed active site structure. The R and S isomers of beta-substituted phenyl and p-chlorophenyl GABA would bind in very different modes due to differential steric interactions, with the reactive S isomer leaving the orientation of the GABA moiety relatively unperturbed compared to that of the natural substrate. In our model, only the reactive S isomer of the mechanism-based inhibitor vinyl-GABA, an effective anti-epileptic drug known clinically as Vigabatrin, would orient the scissile C4-H bond perpendicular to the coenzyme ring plane and present the proton to Lys 329, the proposed general base catalyst of the reaction. The R isomer would direct the vinyl group toward Lys 329 and the C4-H bond toward Arg 445. The active site model presented provides a basis for site-directed mutagenesis and drug design experiments.     

The use of natural and unnatural amino acid substrates to define the substrate specificity differences of Escherichia coli aspartate and tyrosine aminotransferases.

The tyrosine (eTATase) and aspartate (eAATase) aminotransferases of Escherichia coli transaminate diacarboxylic amino acids with similar rate constants. However, eTATase exhibits approximately 10(2)-10(4)-fold higher second-order rate constants for the transamination of aromatic amino acids than does eAATase. A series of natural and unnatural amino acid substrates was used to quantitate specificity differences for these two highly related enzymes. A general trend toward lower transamination activity with increasing side-chain length (extending from aspartate to glutamate to alpha-aminoadipate) is observed for both enzymes. This result suggests that dicarboxylate ligands associate with the two highly related enzymes in a similar manner. The high reactivity of the enzymes with L-Asp and L-Glu can be attributed to an ion pair interaction between the side-chain carboxylate of the amino acid substrate and the guanidino group of the active site residue Arg 292 that is common to both enzymes. A strong linear correlation between side-chain hydrophobicity and transamination rate constants obtains for n-alkyl side-chain amino substrates with eTATase, but not for eAATase. The present kinetic data support a model in which eAATase contains one binding mode for all classes of substrate, whereas the active site of eTATase allows an additional mode that has increased affinity for hydrophobic amino acid.     

Redesign of the substrate specificity of Escherichia coli aspartate aminotransferase to that of Escherichia coli tyrosine aminotransferase by homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis.

Although several high-resolution X-ray crystallographic structures have been determined for Escherichia coli aspartate aminotransferase (eAATase), efforts to crystallize E. coli tyrosine aminotransferase (eTATase) have been unsuccessful. Sequence alignment analyses of eTATase and eAATase show 43% sequence identity and 72% sequence similarity, allowing for conservative substitutions. The high similarity of the two sequences indicates that both enzymes must have similar secondary and tertiary structures. Six active site residues of eAATase were targeted by homology modeling as being important for aromatic amino acid reactivity with eTATase. Two of these positions (Thr 109 and Asn 297) are invariant in all known aspartate aminotransferase enzymes, but differ in eTATase (Ser 109 and Ser 297). The other four positions (Val 39, Lys 41, Thr 47, and Asn 69) line the active site pocket of eAATase and are replaced by amino acids with more hydrophobic side chains in eTATase (Leu 39, Tyr 41, Ile 47, and Leu 69). These six positions in eAATase were mutated by site-directed mutagenesis to the corresponding amino acids found in eTATase in an attempt to redesign the substrate specificity of eAATase to that of eTATase. Five combinations of the individual mutations were obtained from mutagenesis reactions. The redesigned eAATase mutant containing all six mutations (Hex) displays second-order rate constants for the transamination of aspartate and phenylalanine that are within an order of magnitude of those observed for eTATase. Thus, the reactivity of eAATase with phenylalanine was increased by over three orders of magnitude without sacrificing the high transamination activity with aspartate observed for both enzymes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Molecular function prediction for a family exhibiting evolutionary tendencies toward substrate specificity swapping: Recurrence of tyrosine aminotransferase activity in the Iα subfamily

The subfamily Iα aminotransferases are typically categorized as having narrow specificity toward carboxylic amino acids (AATases), or broad specificity that includes aromatic amino acid substrates (TATases). Because of their general role in central metabolism and, more specifically, their association with liver‐related diseases in humans, this subfamily is biologically interesting. The substrate specificities for only a few members of this subfamily have been reported, and the reliable prediction of substrate specificity from protein sequence has remained elusive. In this study, a diverse set of aminotransferases was chosen for characterization based on a scoring system that measures the sequence divergence of the active site. The enzymes that were experimentally characterized include both narrow‐specificity AATases and broad‐specificity TATases, as well as AATases with broader‐specificity and TATases with narrower‐specificity than the previously known family members. Molecular function and phylogenetic analyses underscored the complexity of this family's evolution as the TATase function does not follow a single evolutionary thread, but rather appears independently multiple times during the evolution of the subfamily. The additional functional characterizations described in this article, alongside a detailed sequence and phylogenetic analysis, provide some novel clues to understanding the evolutionary mechanisms at work in this family. Proteins 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Structural and biochemical basis for the substrate specificity of Pad-1, an indole-3-pyruvic acid aminotransferase in auxin homeostasis

Phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) plays a vital role in regulating plant growth and development. Tryptophan-dependent IAA biosynthesis participates in IAA homeostasis by producing IAA via two sequential reactions, which involve a conversion of tryptophan to indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPyA) by tryptophan aminotransferase (TAA1) followed by the irreversible formation of IAA in the second reaction. Pad-1 from Solanaceae plants regulates IAA levels by catalyzing a reverse reaction of the first step of IAA biosynthesis. Pad-1 is a pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)-dependent aminotransferase, with IPyA as the amino acceptor and l-glutamine as the amino donor. Currently, the structural and functional basis for the substrate specificity of Pad-1 remains poorly understood. In this study, we carried out structural and kinetic analyses of Pad-1 from Solanum melongena. Pad-1 is a homodimeric enzyme, with coenzyme PLP present between a central large α/β domain and a protruding small domain. The active site of Pad-1 includes a vacancy near the phosphate group (P-side) and the 3′-O (O-side) of PLP. These features are distinct from those of TAA1, which is homologous in an overall structure with Pad-1 but includes only the P-side region in the active site. Kinetic analysis suggests that P-side residues constitute a binding pocket for l-glutamine, and O-side residues of Phe124 and Ile350 are involved in the binding of IPyA. These studies illuminate distinct differences in the active site between Pad-1 and TAA1, and provide structural and functional insights into the substrate specificity of Pad-1.     

Structure and substrate specificity determinants of NfnB,a dinitroaniline herbicide–catabolizing nitroreductase from Sphingopyxis sp. strain HMH

Nitroreductases are emerging as attractive bioremediation enzymes, with substrate promiscuity toward both natural and synthetic compounds. Recently, the nitroreductase NfnB from Sphingopyxis sp. strain HMH exhibited metabolic activity for dinitroaniline herbicides including butralin and pendimethalin, triggering the initial steps of their degradation and detoxification. However, the determinants of the specificity of NfnB for these herbicides are unknown. In this study, we performed structural and biochemical analyses of NfnB to decipher its substrate specificity. The homodimer NfnB is a member of the PnbA subgroup of the nitroreductase family. Each monomer displays a central α + β fold for the core domain, with a protruding middle region and an extended C-terminal region. The protruding middle region of Val75–Tyr129 represents a structural extension that is a common feature to members of the PnbA subgroup and functions as an opening wall connecting the coenzyme FMN-binding site to the surface, therefore serving as a substrate binding site. We performed mutational, kinetic, and structural analyses of mutant enzymes and found that Tyr88 in the middle region plays a pivotal role in substrate specificity by determining the dimensions of the wall opening. The mutation of Tyr88 to phenylalanine or alanine caused significant changes in substrate selectivity toward bulkier dinitroaniline herbicides such as oryzalin and isopropalin without compromising its activity. These results provide a framework to modify the substrate specificity of nitroreductase in the PnbA subgroup, which has been a challenging issue for its biotechnological and bioremediation applications.     

Molecular basis for acceptor substrate specificity of the human beta1,3-glucuronosyltransferases GlcAT-I and GlcAT-P involved in glycosaminoglycan and HNK-1 carbohydrate epitope biosynthesis, respectively

The human beta1,3-glucuronosyltransferases galactose-beta1,3-glucuronosyltransferase I (GlcAT-I) and galactose-beta1,3-glucuronosyltransferase P (GlcAT-P) are key enzymes involved in proteoglycan and HNK-1 carbohydrate epitope synthesis, respectively. Analysis of their acceptor specificity revealed that GlcAT-I was selective toward Galbeta1,3Gal (referred to as Gal2-Gal1), whereas GlcAT-P presented a broader profile. To understand the molecular basis of acceptor substrate recognition, we constructed mutants and chimeric enzymes based on multiple sequence alignment and structural information. The drastic effect of mutations of Glu227, Arg247, Asp252, and Glu281 on GlcAT-I activity indicated a key role for the hydrogen bond network formed by these four conserved residues in dictating Gal2 binding. Investigation of GlcAT-I determinants governing Gal1 recognition showed that Trp243 could not be replaced by its counterpart Phe in GlcAT-P. This result combined with molecular modeling provided evidence for the importance of stacking interactions with Trp at position 243 in the selectivity of GlcAT-I toward Galbeta1,3Gal. Mutation of Gln318 predicted to be hydrogen-bonded to 6-hydroxyl of Gal1 had little effect on GlcAT-I activity, reinforcing the role of Trp243 in Gal1 binding. Substitution of Phe245 in GlcAT-P by Ala selectively abolished Galbeta1,3Gal activity, also highlighting the importance of an aromatic residue at this position in defining the specificity of GlcAT-P. Finally, substituting Phe245, Val320, or Asn321 in GlcAT-P predicted to interact with N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), by their counterpart in GlcAT-I, moderately affected the activity toward the reference substrate of GlcAT-P, N-acetyllactosamine, indicating that its active site tolerates amino acid substitutions, an observation that parallels its promiscuous substrate profile. Taken together, the data clearly define key residues governing the specificity of beta1,3-glucuronosyltransferases.     

The pH dependence of the allosteric response of human liver pyruvate kinase to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, ATP, and alanine

The allosteric regulation of human liver pyruvate kinase (hL-PYK) by fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (Fru-1,6-BP; activator), ATP (inhibitor) and alanine (Ala; inhibitor) was monitored over a pH range from 6.5 to 8.0 at 37 °C. As a function of increasing pH, hL-PYK’s affinity for the substrate phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), and for Fru-1,6-BP decreases, while affinities for ATP and alanine slightly increases. At pH 6.5, Fru-1,6-BP and ATP elicit only small allosteric impacts on PEP affinity. As pH increases, Fru-1,6-BP and ATP elicit greater allosteric responses, but the response to alanine is relatively constant. Since the magnitudes of the allosteric coupling for ATP and for alanine inhibition are different and the pH dependences of these magnitudes are not similar, these inhibitors likely elicit their responses using different molecular mechanisms. In addition, our results fail to support a general correlation between pH dependent changes in effector affinity and pH dependent changes in the corresponding allosteric response.     

Structural basis for substrate specificity of l‐methionine decarboxylase

l ‐Methionine decarboxylase (MetDC) from Streptomyces sp. 590 is a vitamin B₆‐dependent enzyme and catalyzes the non‐oxidative decarboxylation of l ‐methionine to produce 3‐methylthiopropylamine and carbon dioxide. We present here the crystal structures of the ligand‐free form of MetDC and of several enzymatic reaction intermediates. Group II amino acid decarboxylases have many residues in common around the active site but the residues surrounding the side chain of the substrate differ. Based on information obtained from the crystal structure, and mutational and biochemical experiments, we propose a key role for Gln64 in determining the substrate specificity of MetDC, and for Tyr421 as the acid catalyst that participates in protonation after the decarboxylation reaction.     

Kinetic investigation of the polymerase and exonuclease activities of human DNA polymerase ε holoenzyme

In eukaryotic DNA replication, DNA polymerase ε (Polε) is responsible for leading strand synthesis, whereas DNA polymerases α and δ synthesize the lagging strand. The human Polε (hPolε) holoenzyme is comprised of the catalytic p261 subunit and the noncatalytic p59, p17, and p12 small subunits. So far, the contribution of the noncatalytic subunits to hPolε function is not well understood. Using pre-steady-state kinetic methods, we established a minimal kinetic mechanism for DNA polymerization and editing catalyzed by the hPolε holoenzyme. Compared with the 140-kDa N-terminal catalytic fragment of p261 (p261N), which we kinetically characterized in our earlier studies, the presence of the p261 C-terminal domain (p261C) and the three small subunits increased the DNA binding affinity and the base substitution fidelity. Although the small subunits enhanced correct nucleotide incorporation efficiency, there was a wide range of rate constants when incorporating a correct nucleotide over a single-base mismatch. Surprisingly, the 3′→5′ exonuclease activity of the hPolε holoenzyme was significantly slower than that of p261N when editing both matched and mismatched DNA substrates. This suggests that the presence of p261C and the three small subunits regulates the 3′→5′ exonuclease activity of the hPolε holoenzyme. Together, the 3′→5′ exonuclease activity and the variable mismatch extension activity modulate the overall fidelity of the hPolε holoenzyme by up to 3 orders of magnitude. Thus, the presence of p261C and the three noncatalytic subunits optimizes the dual enzymatic activities of the catalytic p261 subunit and makes the hPolε holoenzyme an efficient and faithful replicative DNA polymerase.