Oxygen and reactive oxygen species-dependent regulation of plant growth and development

Oxygen and reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been co-opted during evolution into the regulation of plant growth, development, and differentiation. ROS and oxidative signals arising from metabolism or phytohormone-mediated processes control almost every aspect of plant development from seed and bud dormancy, liberation of meristematic cells from the quiescent state, root and shoot growth, and architecture, to flowering and seed production. Moreover, the phytochrome and phytohormone-dependent transmissions of ROS waves are central to the systemic whole plant signaling pathways that integrate root and shoot growth. The sensing of oxygen availability through the PROTEOLYSIS 6 (PRT6) N-degron pathway functions alongside ROS production and signaling but how these pathways interact in developing organs remains poorly understood. Considerable progress has been made in our understanding of the nature of hydrogen peroxide sensors and the role of thiol-dependent signaling networks in the transmission of ROS signals. Reduction/oxidation (redox) changes in the glutathione (GSH) pool, glutaredoxins (GRXs), and thioredoxins (TRXs) are important in the control of growth mediated by phytohormone pathways. Although, it is clear that the redox states of proteins involved in plant growth and development are controlled by the NAD(P)H thioredoxin reductase (NTR)/TRX and reduced GSH/GRX systems of the cytosol, chloroplasts, mitochondria, and nucleus, we have only scratched the surface of this multilayered control and how redox-regulated processes interact with other cell signaling systems.

Oxygen and reactive oxygen species regulate plant growth, development, and differentiation through multiple interlinked signaling pathways.

Advances

• Developmentally regulated hypoxia and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production are key features of the stem cell niches, providing information about stem cell position, the environment, and metabolic state.
• Protein cysteine oxidation is central to oxygen and ROS signaling. However, S-nitrosylation, S-glutathionylation, S-sulfhydration, and S-sulfenylation modifications can occur on the same cysteine. The influence of each modification on stability, localization, and function remains unknown.
• Numerous intersecting ROS signaling pathways are probable and likely depend on the site of ROS production and the nature of the oxidized receptor protein. ROS sensors such as the hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂)-INDUCED Ca²⁺ INCREASES 1 (HPCA1) leucine rich receptor kinase translate redox signals into protein modifications to regulate signaling cascades. H₂O₂ perception/transduction is dependent on thiol-dependent mechanisms policed by the ferredoxin/thioredoxin (TRX), NAD(P)H TRX reductase C (NTRC), reduced glutathione (GSH), and glutaredoxin (GRX) systems.
• ROS waves transmit redox signals from cell to cell in the apoplast, and probably through plasmodesmata. Long-distance transport of H₂O₂ and other ROS, therefore, appears to be unnecessary. Similarly, contact sites between organelles allow ROS transfer.
• Convergence points for oxygen and ROS signaling occur on proteins such as ROH OF PLANT 2 (ROP2) GTPase,RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOG D (RBOHD), and TRX-h to regulate meristematic activity via TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN (TOR) kinase activity.

     

Mitochondrial redox systems as central hubs in plant metabolism and signaling

Plant mitochondria are indispensable for plant metabolism and are tightly integrated into cellular homeostasis. This review provides an update on the latest research concerning the organization and operation of plant mitochondrial redox systems, and how they affect cellular metabolism and signaling, plant development, and stress responses. New insights into the organization and operation of mitochondrial energy systems such as the tricarboxylic acid cycle and mitochondrial electron transport chain (mtETC) are discussed. The mtETC produces reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, which can act as signals or lead to cellular damage, and are thus efficiently removed by mitochondrial antioxidant systems, including Mn-superoxide dismutase, ascorbate–glutathione cycle, and thioredoxin-dependent peroxidases. Plant mitochondria are tightly connected with photosynthesis, photorespiration, and cytosolic metabolism, thereby providing redox-balancing. Mitochondrial proteins are targets of extensive post-translational modifications, but their functional significance and how they are added or removed remains unclear. To operate in sync with the whole cell, mitochondria can communicate their functional status via mitochondrial retrograde signaling to change nuclear gene expression, and several recent breakthroughs here are discussed. At a whole organism level, plant mitochondria thus play crucial roles from the first minutes after seed imbibition, supporting meristem activity, growth, and fertility, until senescence of darkened and aged tissue. Finally, plant mitochondria are tightly integrated with cellular and organismal responses to environmental challenges such as drought, salinity, heat, and submergence, but also threats posed by pathogens. Both the major recent advances and outstanding questions are reviewed, which may help future research efforts on plant mitochondria.

Plant mitochondria are key components of redox homeostasis and play vital roles in regulating cellular metabolism, thereby affecting development and stress tolerance at the whole plant level.

Advances

• Improved quantitative MS-based approaches have accelerated the study of mitochondrial protein abundance, turnover and PTMs.
• Mitochondrial enzymes and cellular compartments operate interactively and efficiently exchange substrates.
• Roles for mitochondrial retrograde signaling in plant growth, during physiologically relevant stress conditions and in interaction with other organelles such as the chloroplasts, have been clarified.
• Further insights into mitochondrial antioxidant and peroxidase systems and how they affect other redox systems, enzymes, and whole plant growth have been generated.
• Our understanding of how mitochondria help plants power development and cope with adversity has improved.

     

Contemporary proteomic strategies for cysteine redoxome profiling

Protein cysteine residues are susceptible to oxidative modifications that can affect protein functions. Proteomic techniques that comprehensively profile the cysteine redoxome, the repertoire of oxidized cysteine residues, are pivotal towards a better understanding of the protein redox signaling. Recent technical advances in chemical tools and redox proteomic strategies have greatly improved selectivity, in vivo applicability, and quantification of the cysteine redoxome. Despite this substantial progress, still many challenges remain. Here, we provide an update on the recent advances in proteomic strategies for cysteine redoxome profiling, compare the advantages and disadvantages of current methods and discuss the outstanding challenges and future perspectives for plant redoxome research.

Current cysteine redoxome profiling can characterize systematically diverse oxidative posttranslational modifications

Advances

• The chemical toolbox for Cys redoxome profiling has extensively expanded.
• Advanced chemoproteomic platforms have been applied to target specific Cys oxidative posttranslational modifications (OxiPTMs).
• Various reductomic workflows have been widely implemented for reversible Cys OxiPTMs quantification.
• Workflows have been integrated to measure the occupancy of multiple OxiPTMs simultaneously.
• Disulfide-based traps enable the in situ profiling for –SOH sites.

     

Live monitoring of plant redox and energy physiology with genetically encoded biosensors

Genetically encoded biosensors pave the way for understanding plant redox dynamics and energy metabolism on cellular and subcellular levels.

ADVANCES

• Methodological advances in fluorescent protein-based in vivo biosensing have been instrumental for several paradigm shifts in our understanding of cell physiology, metabolism and signaling.
• An increasing number of genetically encoded biosensors has been used to dissect the dynamics of several distinct redox couples and energy physiology in plants.
• In vivo monitoring using biosensors has pioneered the simultaneous read-out of different physiological parameters in different subcellular locations by parallelized plate reader-based, multiwell fluorimetry, or expression strategies for multiple sensors in parallel.
• Sensing dynamic changes in hydrogen peroxide levels is possible with sensors of the HyPer family, or roGFP fusion variants with a thiol peroxidase.
• Peredox and SoNar family sensors enable direct visualization of NADH/NAD⁺, while iNAP family sensors respond to NADPH concentration in plants.
• Sensor variants with different sensitivity ranges enable use of the most appropriate variant for the specific in vivo environment or experimental scope.

     

Hormonal impact on photosynthesis and photoprotection in plants

Photosynthesis is not only essential for plants, but it also sustains life on Earth. Phytohormones play crucial roles in developmental processes, from organ initiation to senescence, due to their role as growth and developmental regulators, as well as their central role in the regulation of photosynthesis. Furthermore, phytohormones play a major role in photoprotection of the photosynthetic apparatus under stress conditions. Here, in addition to discussing our current knowledge on the role of the phytohormones auxin, cytokinins, gibberellins, and strigolactones in promoting photosynthesis, we will also highlight the role of abscisic acid beyond stomatal closure in modulating photosynthesis and photoprotection under various stress conditions through crosstalk with ethylene, salicylates, jasmonates, and brassinosteroids. Furthermore, the role of phytohormones in controlling the production and scavenging of photosynthesis-derived reactive oxygen species, the duration and extent of photo-oxidative stress and redox signaling under stress conditions will be discussed in detail. Hormones have a significant impact on the regulation of photosynthetic processes in plants under both optimal and stress conditions, with hormonal interactions, complementation, and crosstalk being important in the spatiotemporal and integrative regulation of photosynthetic processes during organ development at the whole-plant level.

In addition to mediating stoma-induced reductions in photosynthesis during stress, phytohormones modulate the spatiotemporal and integrative regulation of photosynthetic and photoprotection processes.

Advances

• Hormones strongly impact photosynthesis, both indirectly and directly.
• Not only CKs, but also auxin, GAs, and SLs are essential to modulate photosynthetic rates under optimal conditions at the whole-plant level.
• ABA, JAs, SA, and ethylene play a major role in the regulation of photosynthesis under various stress conditions.
• An integrated hormonal response at the whole-plant level allows the most adequate photosynthetic response to every developmental and stress situation.

     

The mechanism of host-induced germination in root parasitic plants

Chemical signals known as strigolactones (SLs) were discovered more than 50 years ago as host-derived germination stimulants of parasitic plants in the Orobanchaceae. Strigolactone-responsive germination is an essential adaptation of obligate parasites in this family, which depend upon a host for survival. Several species of obligate parasites, including witchweeds (Striga, Alectra spp.) and broomrapes (Orobanche, Phelipanche spp.), are highly destructive agricultural weeds that pose a significant threat to global food security. Understanding how parasites sense SLs and other host-derived stimulants will catalyze the development of innovative chemical and biological control methods. This review synthesizes the recent discoveries of strigolactone receptors in parasitic Orobanchaceae, their signaling mechanism, and key steps in their evolution.

A family of receptors that evolved in the Orobanchaceae family enable seeds of parasitic plants to sense strigolactones from a nearby host root and germinate.

Advances

• Strigolactone perception by parasite seed is mediated by a clade of neofunctionalized KAI2d proteins that evolved from a receptor that mediates karrikin responses in other plants.
• KAI2d proteins use a similar mechanism to perceive SLs as D14, which mediates growth responses to SLs in nonparasites, but activate different signaling pathways.
• Crystal structure analyses and chemical probes reveal features of KAI2d ligand-binding pockets that contribute to their specificity.

     

Adaptation of the parasitic plant lifecycle: germination is controlled by essential host signaling molecules

Parasitic plants are plants that connect with a haustorium to the vasculature of another, host, plant from which they absorb water, assimilates, and nutrients. Because of this parasitic lifestyle, parasitic plants need to coordinate their lifecycle with that of their host. Parasitic plants have evolved a number of host detection/host response mechanisms of which the germination in response to chemical host signals in one of the major families of parasitic plants, the Orobanchaceae, is a striking example. In this update review, we discuss these germination stimulants. We review the different compound classes that function as germination stimulants, how they are produced, and in which host plants. We discuss why they are reliable signals, how parasitic plants have evolved mechanisms that detect and respond to them, and whether they play a role in host specificity. The advances in the knowledge underlying this signaling relationship between host and parasitic plant have greatly improved our understanding of the evolution of plant parasitism and are facilitating the development of more effective control measures in cases where these parasitic plants have developed into weeds.

Root parasitic plants grow on the roots of other plants and germinate only in the presence of that host, on which they completely depend, through the perception of host presence signaling molecules called germination stimulants.

Outstanding questions

• Have we overlooked the role of germination stimulants in facultative parasites?
• What is the biological relevance of the observation that many plant species produce and secrete a range of different strigolactones?
• Have parasitic plants evolved mechanisms to compensate for low phosphorus availability, a condition that stimulates their germination?
• What is the contribution of the HTL strigolactone receptors to host specificity in parasitic plants or does downstream signaling play a role?
• What other, nonstrigolactone, germination stimulants can parasitic plants respond to and does this require adaptation in the HTL receptors?
• What is the role of germination and underlying mechanism in the rapid adaptation of (orobanchaceous) parasitic plants to a new host?

     

Redox regulation of chloroplast metabolism

Regulation of enzyme activity based on thiol-disulfide exchange is a regulatory mechanism in which the protein disulfide reductase activity of thioredoxins (TRXs) plays a central role. Plant chloroplasts are equipped with a complex set of up to 20 TRXs and TRX-like proteins, the activity of which is supported by reducing power provided by photosynthetically reduced ferredoxin (FDX) with the participation of a FDX-dependent TRX reductase (FTR). Therefore, the FDX–FTR–TRXs pathway allows the regulation of redox-sensitive chloroplast enzymes in response to light. In addition, chloroplasts contain an NADPH-dependent redox system, termed NTRC, which allows the use of NADPH in the redox network of these organelles. Genetic approaches using mutants of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) in combination with biochemical and physiological studies have shown that both redox systems, NTRC and FDX-FTR-TRXs, participate in fine-tuning chloroplast performance in response to changes in light intensity. Moreover, these studies revealed the participation of 2-Cys peroxiredoxin (2-Cys PRX), a thiol-dependent peroxidase, in the control of the reducing activity of chloroplast TRXs as well as in the rapid oxidation of stromal enzymes upon darkness. In this review, we provide an update on recent findings regarding the redox regulatory network of plant chloroplasts, focusing on the functional relationship of 2-Cys PRXs with NTRC and the FDX–FTR–TRXs redox systems for fine-tuning chloroplast performance in response to changes in light intensity and darkness. Finally, we consider redox regulation as an additional layer of control of the signaling function of the chloroplast.

Thiol-dependent redox regulatory and antioxidant systems act concertedly to modulate chloroplast metabolism and signaling function.

Advances

• Plant chloroplasts harbor a complex redox network composed of the FDX–FTR–TRXs pathway, linking redox regulation to light, and NTRC, an NADPH-dependent system required for the activity of TRXs. Both systems adjust chloroplast performance to environmental cues.
• A relevant function of NTRC is redox control of 2-Cys PRXs, which maintains the reductive activity of chloroplast TRXs in the light. The NTRC–2-Cys PRXs redox system helps fine-tune the redox state of chloroplast enzymes thereby adjusting photosynthetic performance to changes in light.
• 2-Cys PRXs participate in the rapid oxidative inactivation of chloroplast enzymes in the dark, mediating the transfer of reducing equivalents from reduced enzymes, via TRXs, to hydrogen peroxide.
• Involvement of redox regulation in chloroplast retrograde signaling modulates early stages of plant development and response to environmental stress.

     

Mechanisms of resistance and virulence in parasitic plant–host interactions

Parasitic plants pose a major biotic threat to plant growth and development and lead to losses in crop productivity of billions of USD annually. By comparison with “normal” autotrophic plants, parasitic plants live a heterotrophic lifestyle and rely on water, solutes and to a greater (holoparasitic plants) or lesser extent (hemiparasitic plants) on sugars from other host plants. Most hosts are unable to detect an infestation by plant parasites or unable to fend off these parasitic invaders. However, a few hosts have evolved defense strategies to avoid infestation or protect themselves actively post-attack often leading to full or partial resistance. Here, we review the current state of our understanding of the defense strategies to plant parasitism used by host plants with emphasis on the active molecular resistance mechanisms. Furthermore, we outline the perspectives and the potential of future studies that will be indispensable to develop and breed resistant crops.

Some plants are able to recognize parasitic plants as attacking pathogens and can fend them off by inducing defense responses.

Advances

• Receptor proteins have been discovered in host plants (i.e. sunflower, tomato, or cowpea) that detect parasitic plants as an invading pathogen and further induce plant immunity and resistance responses in hosts leading to a parasite rejection.
• Molecular patterns exist in parasitic plants that can be specifically detected by host plant receptors.
• The host plant receptors require co-receptors and signaling components (i.e. BAK1, SOBIR1, etc.) also known from plant immunity against microbes.
• Parasitic plants evolved strategies to circumvent and to suppress host plant immunity, i.e. by manipulating host cells with siRNAs or proteins that act as effectors.
• Similar to the interaction of plants with microbial pathogens, elements of PTI and ETI can be both observed in plant–parasitic plant interactions.

     

Membrane voltage as a dynamic platform for spatiotemporal signaling,physiological, and developmental regulation

Membrane voltage arises from the transport of ions through ion-translocating ATPases, ion-coupled transport of solutes, and ion channels, and is an integral part of the bioenergetic “currency” of the membrane. The dynamics of membrane voltage—so-called action, systemic, and variation potentials—have also led to a recognition of their contributions to signal transduction, both within cells and across tissues. Here, we review the origins of our understanding of membrane voltage and its place as a central element in regulating transport and signal transmission. We stress the importance of understanding voltage as a common intermediate that acts both as a driving force for transport—an electrical “substrate”—and as a product of charge flux across the membrane, thereby interconnecting all charge-carrying transport across the membrane. The voltage interconnection is vital to signaling via second messengers that rely on ion flux, including cytosolic free Ca²⁺, H⁺, and the synthesis of reactive oxygen species generated by integral membrane, respiratory burst oxidases. These characteristics inform on the ways in which long-distance voltage signals and voltage oscillations give rise to unique gene expression patterns and influence physiological, developmental, and adaptive responses such as systemic acquired resistance to pathogens and to insect herbivory.

Membrane voltage serves as a platform coordinating ion flux to transmit and transduce biological signals.

Advances

• The biophysics of transport that determine membrane voltage are well-described with quantitative flux equations.
• In the models of the guard cell and the giant algae Chara and Nitella these charge-transporting processes accurately describe and predict physiological behavior, including the coupling of membrane voltage oscillations with ion flux, [Ca²⁺]_i, pH, their consequences for cellular osmotic adjustments, and their spatial propagation.
• Unlike neuronal and other animal tissues, action potentials in plants are mediated by a temporal sequence of ion flux through Ca²⁺ and Cl^- channels with voltage recovery driven by ion flux through K⁺ channels. The interplay of channel-mediated ion flux and changes in H⁺-ATPase activity are likely responsible for the slower propagation of variation and systemic potentials.
• In terrestrial plants, membrane voltage transients may propagate along vascular traces, both through the parenchymal cells lining the xylem and through the phloem. Propagation of such voltage transients is associated with glutamate receptor-like channels that may contribute to plasma membrane Ca²⁺ flux and [Ca²⁺]_i elevations.
• Changes in [Ca²⁺]_i, pH, and reactive oxygen species are key mediators that translate voltage signals into physiological, developmental, and adaptive responses in plant tissues.

     

Oxidative and nitrosative signaling in plants: Two branches in the same tree?

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) constitute key features underpinning the dynamic nature of cell signaling systems in plants. Despite their importance in many aspects of cell biology, our understanding of oxidative and especially of nitrosative signaling and their regulation remains poorly understood. Early reports have established that ROS and RNS coordinately regulate plant defense responses to biotic stress. In addition, evidence has accumulated demonstrating that there is a strong cross-talk between oxidative and nitrosative signaling upon abiotic stress conditions. The goal of this mini-review is to provide latest findings showing how both ROS and RNS comprise a coordinated oxidative and nitrosative signaling network that modulates cellular responses in response to environmental stimuli.Key words: abiotic stress, nitrosative stress, oxidative stress, reactive nitrogen species, reactive oxygen species, signaling     

Chloroplast-derived photo-oxidative stress causes changes in H2O2 and EGSH in other subcellular compartments

Metabolic fluctuations in chloroplasts and mitochondria can trigger retrograde signals to modify nuclear gene expression. Mobile signals likely to be involved are reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can operate protein redox switches by oxidation of specific cysteine residues. Redox buffers, such as the highly reduced glutathione pool, serve as reservoirs of reducing power for several ROS-scavenging and ROS-induced damage repair pathways. Formation of glutathione disulfide and a shift of the glutathione redox potential (E_GSH) toward less negative values is considered as hallmark of several stress conditions. Here we used the herbicide methyl viologen (MV) to generate ROS locally in chloroplasts of intact Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seedlings and recorded dynamic changes in E_GSH and H₂O₂ levels with the genetically encoded biosensors Grx1-roGFP2 (for E_GSH) and roGFP2-Orp1 (for H₂O₂) targeted to chloroplasts, the cytosol, or mitochondria. Treatment of seedlings with MV caused rapid oxidation in chloroplasts and, subsequently, in the cytosol and mitochondria. MV-induced oxidation was significantly boosted by illumination with actinic light, and largely abolished by inhibitors of photosynthetic electron transport. MV also induced autonomous oxidation in the mitochondrial matrix in an electron transport chain activity-dependent manner that was milder than the oxidation triggered in chloroplasts by the combination of MV and light. In vivo redox biosensing resolves the spatiotemporal dynamics of compartmental responses to local ROS generation and provides a basis for understanding how compartment-specific redox dynamics might operate in retrograde signaling and stress acclimation in plants.

Methyl viologen-induced photo-oxidative stress increases hydrogen peroxide and oxidation of glutathione in chloroplasts, cytosol, and mitochondria, as well as autonomous oxidation in mitochondria.     

Unravelling how plants benefit from ROS and NO reactions,while resisting oxidative stress

Background and Aims Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), such as nitric oxide (NO), play crucial roles in the signal transduction pathways that regulate plant growth, development and defence responses, providing a nexus of reduction/oxidation (redox) control that impacts on nearly every aspect of plant biology. Here we summarize current knowledge and concepts that lay the foundations of a new vision for ROS/RNS functions – particularly through signalling hubs – for the next decade.Scope Plants have mastered the art of redox control using ROS and RNS as secondary messengers to regulate a diverse range of protein functions through redox-based, post-translational modifications that act as regulators of molecular master-switches. Much current focus concerns the impact of this regulation on local and systemic signalling pathways, as well as understanding how such reactive molecules can be effectively used in the control of plant growth and stress responses.Conclusions The spectre of oxidative stress still overshadows much of our current philosophy and understanding of ROS and RNS functions. While many questions remain to be addressed – for example regarding inter-organellar regulation and communication, the control of hypoxia and how ROS/RNS signalling is used in plant cells, not only to trigger acclimation responses but also to create molecular memories of stress – it is clear that ROS and RNS function as vital signals of living cells.     

The redox language in neurodegenerative diseases: oxidative post-translational modifications by hydrogen peroxide

Neurodegenerative diseases, a subset of age-driven diseases, have been known to exhibit increased oxidative stress. The resultant increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) has long been viewed as a detrimental byproduct of many cellular processes. Despite this, therapeutic approaches using antioxidants were deemed unsuccessful in circumventing neurodegenerative diseases. In recent times, it is widely accepted that these toxic by-products could act as secondary messengers, such as hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), to drive important signaling pathways. Notably, mitochondria are considered one of the major producers of ROS, especially in the production of mitochondrial H₂O₂. As a secondary messenger, cellular H₂O₂ can initiate redox signaling through oxidative post-translational modifications (oxPTMs) on the thiol group of the amino acid cysteine. With the current consensus that cellular ROS could drive important biological signaling pathways through redox signaling, researchers have started to investigate the role of cellular ROS in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, mitochondrial dysfunction has been linked to various neurodegenerative diseases, and recent studies have started to focus on the implications of mitochondrial ROS from dysfunctional mitochondria on the dysregulation of redox signaling. Henceforth, in this review, we will focus our attention on the redox signaling of mitochondrial ROS, particularly on mitochondrial H₂O₂, and its potential implications with neurodegenerative diseases.Subject terms: Post-translational modifications, Neurodegenerative diseases     

Influence of vitamin C and vitamin E on redox signaling: Implications for exercise adaptations

The exogenous antioxidants vitamin C (ascorbate) and vitamin E (α-tocopherol) often blunt favorable cell signaling responses to exercise, suggesting that redox signaling contributes to exercise adaptations. Current theories posit that this antioxidant paradigm interferes with redox signaling by attenuating exercise-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generation. The well-documented in vitro antioxidant actions of ascorbate and α-tocopherol and characterization of the type and source of the ROS/RNS produced during exercise theoretically enable identification of redox-dependent mechanisms responsible for the blunting of favorable cell signaling responses to exercise. This review aimed to apply this reasoning to determine how the aforementioned antioxidants might attenuate exercise-induced ROS/RNS production. The principal outcomes of this analysis are (1) neither antioxidant is likely to attenuate nitric oxide signaling either directly (reaction with nitric oxide) or indirectly (reaction with derivatives, e.g., peroxynitrite); (2) neither antioxidant reacts appreciably with hydrogen peroxide, a key effector of redox signaling; (3) ascorbate but not α-tocopherol has the capacity to attenuate exercise-induced superoxide generation; and (4) alternate mechanisms, namely pro-oxidant side reactions and/or reduction of bioactive oxidized macromolecule adducts, are unlikely to interfere with exercise-induced redox signaling. Out of all the possibilities considered, ascorbate-mediated suppression of superoxide generation with attendant implications for hydrogen peroxide signaling is arguably the most cogent explanation for blunting of favorable cell signaling responses to exercise. However, this mechanism is dependent on ascorbate accumulating at sites rich in NADPH oxidases, principal contributors to contraction-mediated superoxide generation, and outcompeting nitric oxide and superoxide dismutase isoforms. The major conclusions of this review are: (1) direct evidence for interference of ascorbate and α-tocopherol with exercise-induced ROS/RNS production is lacking; (2) theoretical analysis reveals that both antioxidants are unlikely to have a major impact on exercise-induced redox signaling; and (3) it is worth considering alternate redox-independent mechanisms.     

Motif-based endomembrane trafficking

Endomembrane trafficking, which allows proteins and lipids to flow between the different endomembrane compartments, largely occurs by vesicle-mediated transport. Transmembrane proteins intended for transport are concentrated into a vesicle or carrier by undulation of a donor membrane. This is followed by vesicle scission, uncoating, and finally, fusion at the target membrane. Three major trafficking pathways operate inside eukaryotic cells: anterograde, retrograde, and endocytic. Each pathway involves a unique set of machinery and coat proteins that pack the transmembrane proteins, along with their associated lipids, into specific carriers. Adaptor and coatomer complexes are major facilitators that function in anterograde transport and in endocytosis. These complexes recognize the transmembrane cargoes destined for transport and recruit the coat proteins that help form the carriers. These complexes use either linear motifs or posttranslational modifications to recognize the cargoes, which are then packaged and delivered along the trafficking pathways. In this review, we focus on the different trafficking complexes that share a common evolutionary branch in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), and we discuss up-to-date knowledge about the cargo recognition motifs they use.

Trafficking protein complexes recognize specific linear motifs or modifications on integral membrane proteins and this recognition guides their transport between the different cellular compartments.

ADVANCED

• Plant research is slowly gaining insight into the linear trafficking motifs used by the various AP complexes.Recent observations point out that steady-state accumulation of cargo proteins at the plasma membrane is not necessarily caused by to impaired internalization.
• TSET/TPC, the most recently identified member of the heterotetrameric adaptor complex-containing coat (HTAC-CC) family, and the identification of an endocytic-autophagosomal degradation pathway operating between the contact sites of the endoplasmic reticulum with the plasma membrane and the vacuole provide previously undiscovered additional layers of complexity to endomembrane trafficking in plants.

     

Nitric oxide and cell signaling; modulation of redox tone and protein modification

Summary. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) have an impact on many cellular processes, often serving as signal transducers in both physiological and pathological situations. These small molecules can act as ligands for receptors as is the case for nitric oxide and guanylate cyclase. However, they can also modify proteins, changing their function and establishing a baseline for other signals in a process that we have termed redox tone. In this review, we discuss the different mechanisms of redox cell signaling, and give specific examples of RNS participation in cell signaling via classical and redox tone pathways.