Inducible defense against pathogens and parasites: optimal choice among multiple options

Defense against pathogen, parasites and herbivores is often enhanced after their invasion into the host's body. Sometimes different options are adopted depending on the identity and the quantity of the pathogen, exemplified by the switch between Th1 and Th2 systems in mammalian immunity. In this paper, we study the optimal defense of the host when two alternative responses are available, which differ in the effectiveness of suppressing the growth of pathogen (parasite, or herbivore), the damage to the host caused by the defense response, and the magnitude of time delay before the defense response becomes fully effective. The optimal defense is the one that minimizes the sum of the damages caused by the pathogen and the cost due to defense activities. The damage by pathogens increases in proportion to the time integral of the pathogen abundance, and the cost is proportional to the defense activity. We can prove that a single globally optimal combination of defense options always exists and there is no other local optimum. Depending on the parameters, the optimal is to adopt only the early response, only the late response, or both responses. The defense response with a shorter time delay is more heavily used when the pathogen grows fast, the initial pathogen abundance is large, and the difference in time delay is long. We also study the host's optimal choice between constitutive and inducible defenses. In the constitutive defense, the response to pathogen attack works without delay, but it causes the cost even when the pathogen attack does not occur. We discuss mammalian immunity and the plant chemical defense from the model's viewpoint.     

Light regulation and daytime dependency of inducible plant defenses in Arabidopsis: phytochrome signaling controls systemic acquired resistance rather than local defense

We have examined molecular and physiological principles underlying the light dependency of defense activation in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants challenged with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Within a fixed light/dark cycle, plant defense responses and disease resistance significantly depend on the time of day when pathogen contact takes place. Morning and midday inoculations result in higher salicylic acid accumulation, faster expression of pathogenesis-related genes, and a more pronounced hypersensitive response than inoculations in the evening or at night. Rather than to the plants' circadian rhythm, this increased plant defense capability upon day inoculations is attributable to the availability of a prolonged light period during the early plant-pathogen interaction. Moreover, pathogen responses of Arabidopsis double mutants affected in light perception, i.e. cryptochrome1cryptochrome2 (cry1cry2), phototropin1phototropin2 (phot1phot2), and phytochromeAphytochromeB (phyAphyB) were assessed. Induction of defense responses by either avirulent or virulent P. syringae at inoculation sites is relatively robust in leaves of photoreceptor mutants, indicating little cross talk between local defense and light signaling. In addition, the blue-light receptor mutants cry1cry2 and phot1phot2 are both capable of establishing a full systemic acquired resistance (SAR) response. Induction of SAR and salicylic-acid-dependent systemic defense reactions, however, are compromised in phyAphyB mutants. Phytochrome regulation of SAR involves the essential SAR component FLAVIN-DEPENDENT MONOOXYGENASE1. Our findings highlight the importance of phytochrome photoperception during systemic rather than local resistance induction. The phytochrome system seems to accommodate the supply of light energy to the energetically costly increase in whole plant resistance.     

Cereal host interactions with Russian wheat aphid: A review

Abstract

A lack of understanding the interaction between the Russian wheat aphid (RWA) and its host plant is a limitation in developing effective strategies for controlling the aphid. It is generally assumed that the interaction between aphid and plant is similar to that between plant and pathogen; that is, an elicitor from the insect is recognized by a protein from the host plant and a cascade of signal transduction events follows. However, evidence suggests that RWA feeding is eliciting both the SA- and JA/ethylene-dependent signaling pathways by mimicking aspects of both pathogen and herbivorous insect attacks. Results further suggest that phenotypic symptoms after RWA feeding are under regulation via two independent reactions, namely an immediate response (i.e., leaf rolling) and a downstream event (i.e., chlorosis). These defense responses enable a resistant host plant to defend itself and overcome the stress response, while their susceptible counterparts die. The processes involved in the onset of the defense response are discussed, and mechanisms enabling resistant plants to overcome the stress associated with the feeding process are presented as a working model for RWA-cereal host interaction. Knowledge of genes involved in wheat's defense responses against the RWA and an understanding of their functions may provide additional strategies for developing broad-spectrum resistance in plants.     

植物抗病的分子生物学基础

随着分子生物学的不断发展,人们已逐步了解植物寄主与病原之间的相互作用及植物抗病的分子机理。植物受病原侵染后出现两种类型的卫反应：局部防卫反应（过敏反应）和系统获得性防卫反应。本质素、植保素、活性氧、水杨酸等物质已被证明了在植物抗病中起了重要作用。抗病基因和防卫基因的诱导表达构成了防卫反应的遗传基础。本文综述了近年来抗病的分子生物学研究进展,并对其发展和应用前景作了展望。     

Elicitors: Their Significance and Primary Modes of Action in the Induction of Plant Defense Reactions

Substances of pathogen origin that induce plant defense reactions,as exemplified by the production of antimicrobial phytoalexins,are known collectively as elicitors. Elicitors appear to berecognized by plant cells via interactions with specific receptorson plant plasma membranes. The elicitor-receptor interactionsare presumed to generate signals that then activate nucleargenes involved in plant defense reactions, such as the biosynthesisof phytoalexins. The details of this sequence of molecular events,which lead to plant defense reactions, as well as the rolesof elicitors in invoking the general resistance of plants topathogens and in determining disease specificity, are the focusof this review. (Received August 11, 1993; )     

Fungal Pathogens: The Battle for Plant Infection

The attempted infection of a plant by a pathogen, such as a fungus or an Oomycete, may be regarded as a battle whose major weapons are proteins and smaller chemical compounds produced by both organisms. Indeed, plants produce an astonishing plethora of defense compounds that are still being discovered at a rapid pace. This pattern arose from a multi-million year, ping-pong?type co-evolution, in which plant and pathogen successively added new chemical weapons in this perpetual battle. As each defensive innovation was established in the host, new ways to circumvent it evolved in the pathogen. This complex co-evolution process probably explains not only the exquisite specificity observed between many pathogens and their hosts, but also the ineffectiveness or redundancy of some defensive genes which often encode enzymes with overlapping activities. Plants evolved a complex, multi-level series of structural and chemical barriers that are both constitutive or preformed and inducible. These defenses may involve strengthening of the cell wall, hypersensitive response (HR), oxidative burst, phytoalexins and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins. The pathogen must successfully overcome these obstacles before it succeeds in causing disease. In some cases, it needs to modulate or modify plant cell metabolism to its own benefit and/or to abolish defense reactions. Central to the activation of plant responses is timely perception of the pathogen by the plant. A crucial role is played by elicitors which, depending on their mode of action, are broadly classified into nonspecific elicitors and highly specific elicitors or virulence effector/avirulence factors. A protein battle for penetration is then initiated, marking the pathogen attempted transition from extracellular to invasive growth before parasitism and disease can be established. Three major types of defense responses may be observed in plants: non-host resistance, host resistance, and host pathogenesis. Plant innate immunity may comprise a continuum from non-host resistance involving the detection of general elicitors to host-specific resistance involving detection of specific elicitors by R proteins. It was generally assumed that non-host resistance was based on passive mechanisms and that nonspecific rejection usually arose as a consequence of the non-host pathogen failure to breach the first lines of plant defense. However, recent evidence has blurred the clear-cut distinction among non-host resistance, host-specific resistance and disease. The same obstacles are also serious challenges for host pathogens, reducing their success rate significantly in causing disease. Indeed, even susceptible plants mount a (insufficient) defense response upon recognition of pathogen elicited molecular signals. Recent evidence suggests the occurrence of significant overlaps between the protein components and signalling pathways of these types of resistance, suggesting the existence of both shared and unique features for the three branches of plant innate immunity.     

Collateral gene expression changes induced by distinct plant viruses during the hypersensitive resistance reaction in Chenopodium amaranticolor

Hypersensitive reactions to plant diseases are typically mediated by R genes. Many R genes that have been cloned only confer resistance to a particular pathogen. However, Chenopodium spp. have multivirus hypersensitive resistance, thus making the understanding of this broad-spectrum resistance mechanism attractive. Using tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) tagged with green fluorescent protein to follow infection over time, cDNA-AFLP to find genes up-regulated during virus infection in C. amaranticolor and quantitative RT-PCR to accurately measure gene expression at different time points, the first dissection of this significant defense response pathway is presented. The detected disease-expressed sequences in C. amaranticolor (DESCA) are similar to those that encode p450 monooxegenases, hypersensitivity-related genes, cellulases, ABC transporters, receptor-like kinases, serine/threonine kinases, phosphoribosylanthranilate transferases and hypothetical R genes, many of which are associated with pathogen defense in other plants. The expressions of these DESCA genes are also induced by infection with the taxonomically distinct tobacco rattle virus (TRV) in C. amaranticolor. In particular, DESCA1, one of the gene fragments from C. amaranticolor that lacks similarity to any other sequence in the GenBank database, is induced at least 200 fold 4 d after infection (dai) by both TMV and TRV. The potential role of DESCA genes in a C. amaranticolor multivirus defense response with regard to their levels and time of gene expression is discussed.     

Sucrose-mediated priming of plant defense responses and broad-spectrum disease resistance by overexpression of the maize pathogenesis-related PRms protein in rice plants

Expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes is part of the plant's natural defense response against pathogen attack. The PRms gene encodes a fungal-inducible PR protein from maize. Here, we demonstrate that expression of PRms in transgenic rice confers broad-spectrum protection against pathogens, including fungal (Magnaporthe oryzae, Fusarium verticillioides, and Helminthosporium oryzae) and bacterial (Erwinia chrysanthemi) pathogens. The PRms-mediated disease resistance in rice plants is associated with an enhanced capacity to express and activate the natural plant defense mechanisms. Thus, PRms rice plants display a basal level of expression of endogenous defense genes in the absence of the pathogen. PRms plants also exhibit stronger and quicker defense responses during pathogen infection. We also have found that sucrose accumulates at higher levels in leaves of PRms plants. Sucrose responsiveness of rice defense genes correlates with the pathogen-responsive priming of their expression in PRms rice plants. Moreover, pretreatment of rice plants with sucrose enhances resistance to M. oryzae infection. Together, these results support a sucrose-mediated priming of defense responses in PRms rice plants which results in broad-spectrum disease resistance.     

The fifth dimension of innate immunity

Innate immunity has evolved as a first line defense against invading pathogens. Cellular and humoral elements of the innate immune system detect infectious parasites, initiate inflammatory resistance reactions and finally contribute to the elimination of the invaders. Repeated attacks by pathogenic agents induce adaptive responses of the innate immune system. Typically, reapplication of pathogens provokes tolerance of the affected organism. However, also stimulatory effects of primary infections on subsequent innate immune responses have been observed. The present overview touches an undervalued aspect in the innate immune response: Its pronounced dependency on pathogen load. In addition to localization and timing of innate immune responses the pathogen dose dependency might be considered as a “fifth dimension of innate immunity”. Experimental results and literature data are presented proposing a hormetic reaction pattern of innate immune cells depending on the dose of pathogens.     

Unraveling regulatory networks in plant defense using microarrays

DNA microarrays are being used to comprehensively examine gene expression networks during the plant defense response that is triggered when a plant encounters a pathogen or an elicitor molecule. In addition to identifying new genes induced during defense, these studies are providing new insights into the complex pathways governing defense gene regulation.     

Unraveling regulatory networks in plant defense using microarrays

DNA microarrays are being used to comprehensively examine gene expression networks during the plant defense response that is triggered when a plant encounters a pathogen or an elicitor molecule. In addition to identifying new genes induced during defense, these studies are providing new insights into the complex pathways governing defense gene regulation.     

Methyl jasmonate conditions parsley suspension cells for increased elicitation of phenylpropanoid defense responses.

Pre-incubation of suspension-cultured parsley cells with methyl jasmonate greatly enhances their ability to respond to fungal elicitors by secretion of coumarin derivatives. The effect is most pronounced at relatively low elicitor concentration and also observed for the incorporation of esterified hydroxycinnamic acids and of "lignin-like" polymers into the cell wall. These three responses correspond to defense reactions induced locally when a fungal pathogen attacks plant cells. In contrast, the conditioning of parsley cells by the signal substance methyl jasmonate is reminiscent of the developmental nature of systemic acquired resistance and renders the cells more effective for the elicitor-induced local defense reactions.     

Systemic acquired tolerance to virulent bacterial pathogens in tomato

Recent studies on the interactions between plants and pathogenic microorganisms indicate that the processes of disease symptom development and pathogen growth can be uncoupled. Thus, in many instances, the symptoms associated with disease represent an active host response to the presence of a pathogen. These host responses are frequently mediated by phytohormones. For example, ethylene and salicylic acid (SA) mediate symptom development but do not influence bacterial growth in the interaction between tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and virulent Xanthomonas campestris pv vesicatoria (Xcv). It is not apparent why extensive tissue death is integral to a defense response if it does not have the effect of limiting pathogen proliferation. One possible function for this hormone-mediated response is to induce a systemic defense response. We therefore assessed the systemic responses of tomato to Xcv. SA- and ethylene-deficient transgenic lines were used to investigate the roles of these phytohormones in systemic signaling. Virulent and avirulent Xcv did induce a systemic response as evidenced by expression of defense-associated pathogenesis-related genes in an ethylene- and SA-dependent manner. This systemic response reduced cell death but not bacterial growth during subsequent challenge with virulent Xcv. This systemic acquired tolerance (SAT) consists of reduced tissue damage in response to secondary challenge with a virulent pathogen with no effect upon pathogen growth. SAT was associated with a rapid ethylene and pathogenesis-related gene induction upon challenge. SAT was also induced by infection with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato. These data show that SAT resembles systemic acquired resistance without inhibition of pathogen growth.     

寡聚糖诱导的植物抗性信号转导

来源于植物及其病原体细胞壁的寡聚糖,可作为激发子诱导植物细胞发生抗性反应,寡聚糖信号被植物细胞识别后,可迅速引起质膜去极化,离子通道开放,胞外培养基碱化等瞬间反应;还可通过硬脂酸代谢途径合成茉莉酸信号分子,诱导抗性相关基因的表达。     

Altered response to viral infection by tobacco plants perturbed in ubiquitin system.

Tobacco plants can be perturbed in their ubiquitin system by expression of a ubiquitin variant with a lys to arg change at position 48. Plants expressing this ubiquitin variant have a tendency to form necrotic lesions resembling those occurring as defense reactions against some pathogens. Using the interaction between tobacco and tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), it was investigated whether the ubiquitin variant influences plant responses to pathogen infection. Expression of the ubiquitin variant leads to changes in the response of both resistant and susceptible tobacco varieties. Resistant plants form fewer, but darker lesions. In sensitive plants, TMV replication is inhibited, but not completely abolished. Moreover, susceptible plants expressing the ubiquitin variant induce PR-1 mRNA in response to virus, whereas controls do not express PR-1 under these conditions.