Population genetic consequences of the fragile-X syndrome, based on the X-inactivation imprinting model.

We have examined the population genetic consequences of the model of Laird (Genetics 117:587-599, 1987) in which the fragile-X syndrome is caused by "imprinting" of a mutant chromosome. The imprinting event in this model results from a block to reactivation of an inactive X chromosome prior to oogenesis. If it is assumed that males carrying the imprinted chromosome never reproduce, the frequencies of females and males carrying the imprinted chromosome are expected to be equal. When a mutation-selection balance is established, there are expected to be somewhat more than twice as many females carrying the nonimprinted fragile X as carry the imprinted fragile-X chromosome, the excess depending on the fertility of fragile-X females. Nonpenetrant (transmitting) males, i.e., those with the nonimprinted fragile-X chromosome, are expected to be present at about the same frequency as are males with the syndrome. More than one-third of the nonimprinted chromosomes in the population are expected to be newly arisen in each generation. We have considered possible alternatives to the model of a mutation-selection balance. Nonimprinted carrier females would need to have 100% fertility excess to avoid postulating a high mutation rate to account for the very high prevalence of the syndrome.     

Estimating the stability of the proposed imprinted state of the fragile-X mutation when transmitted by females

Summary Fragile-X syndrome is a major cause of mental retardation in humans. The X-inactivation imprinting model accounts for the unusual pattern of inheritance and expression of this syndrome. According to this model, the fragile-X mutation creates a local block to the attempted reactivation of the mutant X chromosome prior to oogenesis. This local block results in an imprinted fragile-X chromosome that is deleterious in males and in females for whom this chromosome is predominantly the active X chromosome. The imprinted state of the fragile-X mutation is inferred to be stable when transmitted by an imprinted female because the penetrance of the syndrome in sons of affected females is estimated to be 1.0. To provide a more precise estimate of the stability of the proposed fragile-X imprint, we have analyzed published pedigrees that include restriction fragment length polymorphism and cytogenetic data from sibships with mothers who are interpreted as having an imprinted fragile-X allele. We conclude that the fragile-X imprint was stable in 46 out of 48 female meioses. This analysis leads to a preliminary estimate of about 96% for the stability of the imprint through female meiosis. Two imprinted females had progeny who appeared to be carriers of a nonimprinted fragile-X allele. If this interpretation is correct, then reversion from the imprinted to the nonimprinted state, or erasure, can occasionally occur when the mutant fragile-X allele is transmitted by an imprinted female. We discuss the genetic and epigenetic significance of possible female erasure. We request DNA and cytogenetic information from unpublished pedigrees to quantify further the stability, during female meiosis, of the proposed imprinted state of the mutant fragile-X allele.     

From Polytene Chromosomes to Human Embryology: Connections via the Human Fragile-X Syndrome

Inferences about one aspect of human embryology came from analysisof the obscure cytogenetic phenomenon of intercalary heterochromatinin Drosophila melanogaster. The bridge between these two topicsis a human syndrome that represents the most common cause ofinherited mental retardation, the fragile-X syndrome. Two modelswere developed to make this bridge. One model uses intercalaryheterochromatin to provide an explanation for the basis of humanfragile sites. The other model presents an explanation for thecomplex pattern of inheritance and expression of the fragile-Xsyndrome. This syndrome is proposed to result from abnormalchromosome imprinting. The imprinting event gives a potentiallymosaic population of primary oocytes in females who inheriteda non-imprinted fragile-X chromosome. This mosaicism providesa method to estimate the number of oogonial progenitor cellsin humans. This example illustrates the unpredictable courseof basic research, and emphasizes the usefulness of maintainingfor such basic research adequate research funding from biomedicalresearch budgets.     

Comparative sequence analysis of imprinted genes between human and mouse to reveal imprinting signatures

We performed a comparative genomic sequence analysis between human and mouse for 24 imprinted genes on human chromosomes 1, 6, 7, 11, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, and 20. The MEME program was used to search for motifs within conserved sequences among the imprinted genes and we then used the MAST program to analyze for the presence or absence of motifs in the imprinted genes and 128 nonimprinted genes. Our analysis identified 15 motifs that were significantly enriched in the imprinted genes. We generated a logistic regression model by combining multiple motifs as input variables and the 24 imprinted genes and the 128 nonimprinted genes as a training set. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of our model were 98, 92, and 99%, respectively. The model was further validated by an open test on 12 additional imprinted genes. The motifs identified in this study are novel imprinting signatures, which should improve our understanding of genomic imprinting and the role of genomic imprinting in human diseases.     

De novo DNA methylation independent establishment of maternal imprint on X chromosome in mouse oocytes

In female mouse embryos, the paternal X chromosome (Xp) is preferentially inactivated during preimplantation development and trophoblast differentiation. This imprinted X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is partly due to an activating imprint on the maternal X chromosome (Xm), which is set during oocyte growth. However, the nature of this imprint is unknown. DNA methylation is one candidate, and therefore we examined whether disruptions of the two de novo DNA methyltransferases in growing oocytes affect imprinted XCI. We found that accumulation of histone H3 lysine-27 trimethylation, a hallmark of XCI, occurs normally on the Xp, and not on the Xm, in female blastocysts developed from the mutant oocytes. Furthermore, the allelic expression patterns of X-linked genes including Xist and Tsix were unchanged in preimplantation embryos and also in the trophoblast. These results show that a maternal disruption of the DNA methyltransferases has no effect on imprinted XCI and argue that de novo DNA methylation is dispensable for Xm imprinting. This underscores the difference between imprinted XCI and autosomal imprinting.     

Maternal primary imprinting is established at a specific time for each gene throughout oocyte growth.

Primary imprinting during gametogenesis governs the monoallelic expression/repression of imprinted genes in embryogenesis. Previously, we showed that maternal primary imprinting is disrupted in neonate-derived non-growing oocytes. Here, to investigate precisely when and in what order maternal primary imprinting progresses, we produced parthenogenetic embryos containing one genome from a non-growing or growth-stage oocyte from 1- to 20-day-old mice and one from a fully grown oocyte of adult mice. We used these embryos to analyze the expression of eight imprinted genes: Peg1/Mest, Peg3, Snrpn, Znf127, Ndn, Impact, Igf2r, and p57(KIP2). The results showed that the imprinting signals for each gene were not all imposed together at a specific time during oocyte growth but rather occurred throughout the period from primary to antral follicle stage oocytes. The developmental ability of the constructed parthenogenetic embryos was gradually reduced as the nuclear donor oocytes grew. These studies provide the first insight into the process of primary imprinting during oocyte growth.     

Comparative analysis of sequence characteristics of imprinted genes in human, mouse, and cattle

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism that results in monoallelic expression of genes depending on parent-of-origin of the allele. Although the conservation of genomic imprinting among mammalian species has been widely reported for many genes, there is accumulating evidence that some genes escape this conservation. Most known imprinted genes have been identified in the mouse and human, with few imprinted genes reported in cattle. Comparative analysis of genomic imprinting across mammalian species would provide a powerful tool for elucidating the mechanisms regulating the unique expression of imprinted genes. In this study we analyzed the imprinting of 22 genes in human, mouse, and cattle and found that in only 11 was imprinting conserved across the three species. In addition, we analyzed the occurrence of the sequence elements CpG islands, C + G content, tandem repeats, and retrotransposable elements in imprinted and in nonimprinted (control) cattle genes. We found that imprinted genes have a higher G + C content and more CpG islands and tandem repeats. Short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) were notably fewer in number in imprinted cattle genes compared to control genes, which is in agreement with previous reports for human and mouse imprinted regions. Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and long terminal repeats (LTRs) were found to be significantly underrepresented in imprinted genes compared to control genes, contrary to reports on human and mouse. Of considerable significance was the finding of highly conserved tandem repeats in nine of the genes imprinted in all three species. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi: ) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Human imprinted chromosomal regions are historical hot-spots of recombination

Human recombination rates vary along the chromosomes as well as between the two sexes. There is growing evidence that epigenetic factors may have an important influence on recombination rates, as well as on crossover position. Using both public database analysis and wet-bench approaches, we revisited the relationship between increased rates of meiotic recombination and genome imprinting. We constructed metric linkage disequilibrium (LD) maps for all human chromosomal regions known to contain one or more imprinted genes. We show that imprinted regions contain significantly more LD units (LDU) and have significantly more haplotype blocks of smaller sizes than flanking nonimprinted regions. There is also an excess of hot-spots of recombination at imprinted regions, and this is likely to do with the presence of imprinted genes, per se. These findings indicate that imprinted chromosomal regions are historical "hot-spots" of recombination. We also demonstrate, by direct segregation analysis at the 11p15.5 imprinted region, that there is remarkable agreement between sites of meiotic recombination and steps in LD maps. Although the increase in LDU/Megabase at imprinted regions is not associated with any significant enrichment for any particular sequence class, major sequence determinants of recombination rates seem to differ between imprinted and control regions. Interestingly, fine-mapping of recombination events within the most male meiosis-specific recombination hot-spot of Chromosome 11p15.5 indicates that many events may occur within or directly adjacent to regions that are differentially methylated in somatic cells. Taken together, these findings support the involvement of a combination of specific DNA sequences and epigenetic factors as major determinants of hot-spots of recombination at imprinted chromosomal regions.     

Shared role for differentially methylated domains of imprinted genes

For most imprinted genes, a difference in expression between the maternal and paternal alleles is associated with a corresponding difference in DNA methylation that is localized to a differentially methylated domain (DMD). Removal of a gene's DMD leads to a loss of imprinting. These observations suggest that DMDs have a determinative role in genomic imprinting. To examine this possibility, we introduced sequences from the DMDs of the imprinted Igf2r, H19, and Snrpn genes into a nonimprinted derivative of the normally imprinted RSVIgmyc transgene, created by excising its own DMD. Hybrid transgenes with sequences from the Igf2r DMD2 were consistently imprinted, with the maternal allele being more methylated than the paternal allele. Only the repeated sequences within DMD2 were required for imprinting these transgenes. Hybrid transgenes containing H19 and Snrpn DMD sequences and ones containing sequences from the long terminal repeat of a murine intracisternal A particle retrotransposon were not imprinted. The Igf2r hybrid transgenes are comprised entirely of mouse genomic DNA and behave as endogenous imprinted genes in inbred wild-type and mutant mouse strains. These types of hybrid transgenes can be used to elucidate the functions of DMD sequences in genomic imprinting.     

Genomic imprinting at the mammalian Dlk1-Dio3 domain

Genomic imprinting causes genes to be expressed or repressed depending on their parental origin. The majority of imprinted genes identified to date map in clusters and much of our knowledge of the mechanisms, function and evolution of imprinting have emerged from their analysis. The cluster of imprinted genes delineated by the delta-like homolog 1 gene and the type III iodothyronine deiodinase gene (Dlk1-Dio3) is located on distal mouse chromosome 12 and human chromosome 14. Its developmental importance is exemplified by severe phenotypes associated with altered dosage of these genes in mice and humans. The domain contains three imprinted protein-coding genes, Dlk1, Rtl1 and Dio3, expressed from the paternally inherited chromosome and several imprinted large and small noncoding RNA genes expressed from the maternally inherited homolog. Here, we discuss the function and regulation of imprinting at this domain.     

Imprinting mechanisms and genes involved in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes

Prader-Willi (PWS) and Angelman (AS) syndromes illustrate a disease paradigm of genomic imprinting, an epigenetic modification of DNA that results in parent-of-origin specific expression during embryogenesis and in the adult. From genetic data, at least two imprinted genes may be required for the classical PWS phenotype, whereas AS probably involves a single imprinted gene, and rare familial forms of both disorders involve imprinting mutations. In addition, the nonimprinted P gene is associated with pigmentation disorders in PWS, AS and oculocutaneous albinism. Identification of new genes, delineation of small deletions in unique patients, and direct screening for imprinted sequences, should soon identify candidate genes for PWS and AS. The mechanism of imprinting involves DNA methylation and replication timing, and appears to include multiple imprinted genes within a large imprinted domain. Imprinting of these genes may be regulated in cis, by an imprinting control element (ICE). Future studies can be expected to unravel the gene identities and imprinting mechanisms involved in these fascinating disorders; ultimately it may be possible to reactivate imprinted gene expression as a therapeutic approach.     

Comparative phylogenetic analysis of blcap/nnat reveals eutherian-specific imprinted gene

Imprinted genes are parent-of-origin dependent, monoallelically expressed genes present in marsupials and eutherian mammals. Altered expression of imprinted genes plays a significant role in the etiology of a variety of human disorders and diseases. Nevertheless, the regulatory mechanisms of imprinting remain poorly defined. The imprinted gene Neuronatin (Nnat) is an excellent candidate for studying imprinting because it resides within the 8.5-kb intron of the nonimprinted gene Bladder Cancer-Associated Protein (Blcap) and is the only imprinted gene within the region. A phylogenetic comparison of this micro-imprinted domain in human, mouse, and rat revealed several candidates for imprint control, including tandem repeats and putative binding sites for trans- acting factors known to be involved in chromatin remodeling. Genome-wide phylogenetic comparisons of species from the three major extant mammalian clades failed, however, to show any evidence of Nnat outside the eutherian lineage. Thus, Nnat is the first identified eutherian-specific imprinted gene, demonstrating that imprinted genes did not arise at a single point during evolution. This finding also suggests that the complexity of imprinting regulation observed at other loci may, in part, be directly related to the amount of time they have been imprinted.     

The neuronatin gene resides in a "micro-imprinted" domain on human chromosome 20q11.2.

A small fraction of the genome contains genes that are imprinted and thus expressed exclusively from one parental allele.We report here that the human neuronatin gene (NNAT) on chromosome 20q11.2 is imprinted and transcribed specifically from the paternal allele. The region containing NNAT has multiple CpG islands, and methylation analysis showed that a 1.8-kb CpG island in its promoter region exhibits differential methylation in all tissues examined. This finding is consistent with the island acting as a component of the NNAT imprint control domain. NNAT lies within the singular 8.5-kb intron of the gene encoding bladder cancer-associated protein (BLCAP), which, as we demonstrate, is not imprinted. This study provides the first example, to our knowledge, in humans of an imprinted gene contained within the genomic structure of a nonimprinted gene. Thus, NNAT is in an imprinted "microdomain," making this locus uniquely suited for the investigation of mechanisms of localized imprint regulation.     

Identification of an Imprinted Gene Cluster in the X-Inactivation Center

Mammalian development is strongly influenced by the epigenetic phenomenon called genomic imprinting, in which either the paternal or the maternal allele of imprinted genes is expressed. Paternally expressed Xist, an imprinted gene, has been considered as a single cis-acting factor to inactivate the paternally inherited X chromosome (Xp) in preimplantation mouse embryos. This means that X-chromosome inactivation also entails gene imprinting at a very early developmental stage. However, the precise mechanism of imprinted X-chromosome inactivation remains unknown and there is little information about imprinted genes on X chromosomes. In this study, we examined whether there are other imprinted genes than Xist expressed from the inactive paternal X chromosome and expressed in female embryos at the preimplantation stage. We focused on small RNAs and compared their expression patterns between sexes by tagging the female X chromosome with green fluorescent protein. As a result, we identified two micro (mi)RNAs–miR-374-5p and miR-421-3p–mapped adjacent to Xist that were predominantly expressed in female blastocysts. Allelic expression analysis revealed that these miRNAs were indeed imprinted and expressed from the Xp. Further analysis of the imprinting status of adjacent locus led to the discovery of a large cluster of imprinted genes expressed from the Xp: Jpx, Ftx and Zcchc13. To our knowledge, this is the first identified cluster of imprinted genes in the cis-acting regulatory region termed the X-inactivation center. This finding may help in understanding the molecular mechanisms regulating imprinted X-chromosome inactivation during early mammalian development.     

Maternal control of nutrient allocation in plant seeds by genomic imprinting

Imprinted genes are commonly expressed in mammalian placentas and in plant seed endosperms, where they exhibit preferential uniparental allelic expression. In mammals, imprinted genes directly regulate placental function and nutrient distribution from mother to fetus; however, none of the >60 imprinted genes thus far reported in plants have been demonstrated to play an equivalent role in regulating the flow of resources to the embryo. Here we show that imprinted Maternally expressed gene1 (Meg1) in maize is both necessary and sufficient for the establishment and differentiation of the endosperm nutrient transfer cells located at the mother:seed interface. Consistent with these findings, Meg1 also regulates maternal nutrient uptake, sucrose partitioning, and seed biomass yield. In addition, we generated an imprinted and nonimprinted synthetic Meg1 ((syn)Meg1) dosage series whereby increased dosage and absence of imprinting both resulted in an unequal investment of maternal resources into the endosperm. These findings highlight dosage regulation by genomic imprinting as being critical for maintaining a balanced distribution of maternal nutrients to filial tissues in plants, as in mammals. However, unlike in mammals, Meg1 is a maternally expressed imprinted gene that surprisingly acts to promote rather than restrict nutrient allocation to the offspring.     

Chromosomal analysis of unfertilized human oocytes

Unfertilized human oocytes were obtained from women in an in-vitro fertilization programme. The women had a mean age of 29.4 years (range 24-35 years). Chromosomal complements could be analysed in 50 oocytes. Q-banding of the chromosomes facilitated identification of individual chromosomes: 34 oocytes (68%) had the normal haploid chromosomal complement, 14 complements were hypohaploid (28%), 1 complement was hyperhaploid (2%) and 2 had structural abnormalities (4%). (One oocyte had numerical and structural abnormalities). The 16 abnormal oocytes were obtained from 15 different women. A conservative estimate of aneuploidy in this sample is 4%; however, the frequency of aneuploidy may be higher if there is a predisposition to chromosome loss during oogenesis. This study provides information on the largest series of karyotyped unfertilized human oocytes published to date.     

Germ line imprinting in Drosophila: Epigenetics in search of function

Germ line imprinting produces parent-specific differences in the behavior of chromosomes or expression of genes. Epigenetic marks, placed on chromosomes in the parental germ line, govern classical imprinted effects such as chromosomal inactivation, chromosome elimination and mono-allelic expression. Germ line imprinting occurs in insects, plants and mammals. Several Drosophila systems display imprinted effects. In spite of this, many aspects of imprinting in flies, including the normal function of this process, remain mysterious. Transgenerational inheritance of epigenetic marks is a powerful force in genome regulation. Elucidation of the mechanism of imprint establishment and maintenance in a model organism, such as Drosophila, is thus of great interest. In this review we summarize the primary systems that have been used to study imprinting in flies and speculate on the origin and biological function of imprinting in Drosophila.