Identification of factors regulating lipoprotein lipase catalyzed hydrolysis in rats with the aid of monoacid-rich lipoprotein preparations(1)

To identify the substrate specificity and regulatory factors in lipoprotein lipase (LPL) catalyzed hydrolysis of triacylglycerol-rich lipoprotein, monoacid-rich lipoproteins were used to study the kinetic parameters of LPL. Feeding growing rats with diets rich in palmitic acid (16:0), oleic acid (18:1) or linoleic acid (18:2) for 10 days increased the corresponding acid content in the triacylglycerols of the lipoproteins. Force-feeding the monoacid-rich triacylglycerols, particularly 16:0 or 18:1, increased the respective fatty acid content in both chylomicrons and VLDLs. Major apolipoproteins and lipid compositions were essentially similar among all lipoproteins differing in monoacid species, except for apo A-IV. The Vmax of LPL for 16:0-rich chylomicrons and VLDLs were higher than for 18:1- or 18:2-rich lipoproteins. Order parameter (S), an indicator of the surface fluidity of lipoproteins, decreased with the chain length and unsaturation of monoacid in similar manner as the Vmax. The Vmax of LPL increased linearly (P < 0.05) with an increase in either the palmitic acid content of the lipoprotein triacylglycerols or order parameter (S) of the lipoproteins. The order parameter (S) and Vmax of LPL were higher in 16:0 triacylglycerol emulsions with apo B than with 18:1 or 18:2 triacylglycerols. The apo A-IV in triacylglycerol emulsions stimulated Vmax of LPLs in the presence of apo B and apo C-II. The binding of apo A-IV to 16:0 triacylglycerol emulsions was higher than to other triacylglycerol emulsions. These findings suggest that lipoprotein catalysis by LPL is modulated by the 16:0 level in the lipoprotein triacylglycerol, which affects the surface fluidity and apo A-IV content of lipoproteins.     

The kinetic parameters of the uptake of very-low-density lipoprotein remnant cholesteryl esters by perfused rat livers

The aim of this study was to determine the kinetic parameters of the hepatic uptake of VLDL remnant cholesteryl esters. Rat livers were perfused in situ with a broad range of remnant [3H]cholesteryl ester concentrations of known specific radioactivity. Following exactly 3 min of perfusion, hepatic lipids were extracted and labelled cholesteryl esters were separated by thin-layer chromatography and counted. The rate of cholesteryl ester uptake was a saturable process and the apparent kinetic parameters were determined from the Lineweaver-Burk plot of the data. Km and Vmax were calculated to be 72 microM and 35 nmol cholesteryl ester/min per g liver, respectively. For the purpose of comparison, we have expressed our kinetic parameters in terms of number of particles (Vmax = 0.022 nmol particles/min per g liver and Km = 45 nM) and compared our values with those obtained with chylomicron remnants by another group of investigators (Sherrill, B.C., Innerarity, T.L. and Mahley, R.W. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 1804-1807). We found that the maximal capacity for the removal of VLDL particles was similar to what was observed with rat chylomicron remnants. In contrast, the Km for the uptake process of VLDL remnant particles was approximately four times higher than that of rat chylomicron remnant particles. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that hepatic removal of both chylomicron and VLDL remnants is mediated by the same receptor, but suggest that the affinity of VLDL remnants for the hepatic removal process is substantially lower, possibly due to structural differences between the two remnant particles.     

Apolipoprotein VLDL-II inhibits lipolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in the laying hen

In the laying hen, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles contain large amounts of apolipoprotein (apo)-VLDL-II in addition to apoB. These triglyceride-rich lipoproteins are transported from the liver primarily to growing oocytes. Since no appreciable hydrolysis of triglyceride occurs during this transport, we have investigated the possibility that apoVLDL-II functions as an inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase (LPL). The presence of LPL in chicken follicular granulosa cells was demonstrated by immunoblotting, and LPL activity with the usual in vitro characteristics could be measured in cultured granulosa cell extracts. ApoVLDL-II inhibited LPL activity in these extracts as well as in the post-heparin medium of rat cardiac myocytes. Half-maximal inhibition in both systems occurred at 40 micrograms/ml, a concentration that is one-tenth of the circulating apoVLDL-II in the laying hen. Much less inhibition was observed with reduced and alkylated apoVLDL-II and with apoA-I. We conclude that the presence of apoVLDL-II on laying hen VLDL ensures efficient delivery of triglyceride to the oocyte for subsequent use as energy source by the embryo.     

Isolation and characterization of an apoA-II-containing lipoprotein (LP-A-II:B complex) from plasma very low density lipoproteins of patients with Tangier disease and type V hyperlipoproteinemia

Previous studies have shown that very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) from patients with Tangier disease are less effective as a substrate for human milk lipoprotein lipase (LPL) than VLDL from normal controls as assessed by measuring the first order rate constant (k1) of triglyceride hydrolysis. Tangier VLDL also has a higher content of apolipoprotein (apo) A-II than normal VLDL. To explore the possible relationship between the relatively high concentration of apoA-II in VLDL and low k1 values, Tangier VLDL were fractionated on an anti-apoA-II immunosorber. The retained fraction contained a newly identified triglyceride-rich lipoprotein characterized by the presence of apolipoproteins A-II, B, C-I, C-II, C-III, D, and E (LP-A-II:B:C:D:E or LP-A-II:B complex), whereas the unretained fraction consisted of previously identified triglyceride-rich apoB-containing lipoproteins free of apoA-II. In VLDL from patients with Tangier disease or type V hyperlipoproteinemia, the LP-A-II:B complex accounted for 70-90% and 25-70% of the total apoB content, respectively. The LP-A-II:B complexes had similar lipid and apolipoprotein composition; they were poor substrates for LPL as indicated by their low k1 values (0.014-0.016 min-1). In contrast, the apoA-II-free lipoproteins present in unretained fractions were effective substrates for LPL with k1 values equal to or greater than 0.0313 min-1. These results indicate that triglyceride-rich lipoproteins consist of several apoB-containing lipoproteins, including the LP-A-II:B complex, and that lipoprotein particles of similar size and density but distinct apolipoprotein composition also possess distinct metabolic properties.     

Apolipoprotein AV accelerates plasma hydrolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins by interaction with proteoglycan-bound lipoprotein lipase

Apolipoprotein A5 (APOA5) is associated with differences in triglyceride levels and familial combined hyperlipidemia. In genetically engineered mice, apoAV plasma levels are inversely correlated with plasma triglycerides. To elucidate the mechanism by which apoAV influences plasma triglycerides, metabolic studies and in vitro assays resembling physiological conditions were performed. In human APOA5 transgenic mice (hAPOA5tr), catabolism of chylomicrons and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) was accelerated due to a faster plasma hydrolysis of triglycerides by lipoprotein lipase (LPL). Hepatic VLDL and intestinal chylomicron production were not affected. The functional interplay between apoAV and LPL was further investigated by cross-breeding a human LPL transgene with the apoa5 knock-out and the hAPOA5tr to an lpl-deficient background. Increased LPL activity completely normalized hypertriglyceridemia of apoa5-deficient mice; however, overexpression of human apoAV modulated triglyceride levels only slightly when LPL was reduced. To reflect the physiological situation in which LPL is bound to cell surface proteoglycans, we examined hydrolysis in the presence or absence of proteoglycans. Without proteoglycans, apoAV derived either from triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, hAPOA5tr high density lipoprotein, or a recombinant source did not alter the LPL hydrolysis rate. In the presence of proteoglycans, however, apoAV led to a significant and dose-dependent increase in LPL-mediated hydrolysis of VLDL triglycerides. These results were confirmed in cell culture using a proteoglycan-deficient cell line. A direct interaction between LPL and apoAV was found by ligand blotting. It is proposed, that apoAV reduces triglyceride levels by guiding VLDL and chylomicrons to proteoglycan-bound LPL for lipolysis.     

Triacylglycerol and phospholipid hydrolysis in human plasma lipoproteins: role of lipoprotein and hepatic lipase.

To explore the interactions of triacylglycerol and phospholipid hydrolysis in lipoprotein conversions and remodeling, we compared the activities of lipoprotein and hepatic lipases on human VLDL, IDL, LDL, and HDL2. Triacylglycerol and phospholipid hydrolysis by each enzyme were measured concomitantly in each lipoprotein class by measuring hydrolysis of [14C]triolein and [3H]dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine incorporated into each lipoprotein by lipid transfer processes. Hepatic lipase was 2-3 times more efficient than lipoprotein lipase at hydrolyzing phospholipid both in absolute terms and in relation to triacylglycerol hydrolysis in all lipoproteins. The relationship between phospholipid hydrolysis and triacylglycerol hydrolysis was generally linear until half of particle triacylglycerol was hydrolyzed. For either enzyme acting on a single lipoprotein fraction, the degree of phosphohydrolysis closely correlated with triacylglycerol hydrolysis and was largely independent of the kinetics of hydrolysis, suggesting that triacylglycerol removed from a lipoprotein core is an important determinant of phospholipid removal via hydrolysis by the lipase. Phospholipid hydrolysis relative to triacylglycerol hydrolysis was most efficient in VLDL followed in descending order by IDL, HDL, and LDL. Even with hepatic lipase, phospholipid hydrolysis could not deplete VLDL and IDL of sufficient phospholipid molecules to account for the loss of surface phospholipid that accompanies triacylglycerol hydrolysis and decreasing core volume as LDL is formed (or for conversion of HDL2 to HDL3). Thus, shedding of whole phospholipid molecules, presumably in liposomal-like particles, must be a major mechanism for losing excess surface lipid as large lipoprotein particles are converted to smaller particles. Also, this shedding phenomenon, like phospholipid hydrolysis, is closely related to the hydrolysis of lipoprotein triacylglycerol.     

Apolipoprotein E content of VLDL limits LPL-mediated triglyceride hydrolysis

High levels of circulating triglycerides (TGs), or hypertriglyceridemia, are key components of metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and CVD. As TGs are carried by lipoproteins in plasma, hypertriglyceridemia can result from overproduction or lack of clearance of TG-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) such as VLDLs. The primary driver of TRL clearance is TG hydrolysis mediated by LPL. LPL is regulated by numerous TRL protein components, including the cofactor apolipoprotein C-II, but it is not clear how their effects combine to impact TRL hydrolysis across individuals. Using a novel assay designed to mimic human plasma conditions in vitro, we tested the ability of VLDL from 15 normolipidemic donors to act as substrates for human LPL. We found a striking 10-fold difference in hydrolysis rates across individuals when the particles were compared on a protein or a TG basis. While VLDL TG contents moderately correlated with hydrolysis rate, we noticed substantial variations in non-apoB proteins within these particles by MS. The ability of LPL to hydrolyze VLDL TGs did not correlate with apolipoprotein C-II content, but it was strongly inversely correlated with apolipoprotein E (APOE) and, to a lesser extent, apolipoprotein A-II. Addition of exogenous APOE inhibited LPL lipolysis in a dose-dependent manner. The APOE3 and (particularly) APOE4 isoforms were effective at limiting LPL hydrolysis, whereas APOE2 was not. We conclude that APOE on VLDL modulates LPL activity and could be a relevant factor in the pathogenesis of metabolic disease.     

Lipoprotein lipase enhances the cholesteryl ester transfer protein-mediated transfer of cholesteryl esters from high density lipoproteins to very low density lipoproteins

These studies were undertaken to examine the effects of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) on the transfer of cholesteryl esters from high density lipoproteins (HDL) to very low density lipoproteins (VLDL). Human or rat VLDL was incubated with human HDL in the presence of either partially purified CETP, bovine milk LPL or CETP plus LPL. CETP stimulated both isotopic and mass transfer of cholesteryl esters from HDL into VLDL. LPL caused only slight stimulation of cholesteryl ester transfer. However, when CETP and LPL were both present, the transfer of cholesteryl esters from HDL into VLDL remnants was enhanced 2- to 8-fold, compared to the effects of CETP alone. The synergistic effects of CETP and LPL on cholesteryl ester transfer were more pronounced at higher VLDL/HDL ratios and increased with increasing amounts of CETP. In time course studies the stimulation of cholesteryl ester transfer activity occurred during active triglyceride hydrolysis. When lipolysis was inhibited by incubating LPL with either 1 M NaCl or 2 mM diethylparanitrophenyl phosphate, the synergism of CETP and LPL was reduced or abolished, and LPL alone did not stimulate cholesteryl ester transfer. These experiments show that LPL enhances the CETP-mediated transfer of cholesteryl esters from HDL to VLDL. This property of LPL is related to lipolysis.     

The catabolism of human and rat very low density lipoproteins by perfused rat hearts.

The catabolism of human and rat 125I-labelled very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) was compared by perfusing the lipoproteins through beating rat hearts. Triacylglycerol was removed from the VLDL to a greater extent than the protein moiety, leaving remnants containing relatively more apo-B and less apo-C. The change in apo-C content of the remnants correlated with the loss of triacylglycerol. The extent of removal of triacylglycerol from the rat and human VLDL was similar and in most cases appeared to saturate the heart lipoprotein lipase. The remnants were slightly smaller in size than the VLDL, and included particles which appeared to be partially emptied. In addition to remnants of d less than 1.019 g/ml, iodinated lipoproteins derived from rat and human VLDL were recovered at d 1.019-1.063 and 1.063-1.21 g/ml. The former contained largely cholesterol and cholesteryl esters, while phospholipids were the dominant lipid in the latter. An average of 40% of the 125I-labelled apoprotein lost from the VLDL was associated with the perfused hearts. Very little d 1.019-1.063 g/ml lipoprotein was produced from low (physiological) concentrations of rat VLDL, most of the lipoprotein being removed by the heart. However, lipoproteins of density 1.019-1.063 g/ml were formed from human VLDL at all concentrations in the perfusate, as well as from higher concentrations of the rat VLDL. Agarose gel filtration of lipoproteins following heart perfusion with human VLDL revealed large aggregates containing particles which resemble low density lipoproteins (LDL) in electron microscopic appearance and apoprotein composition, since they contain largely apo-B. These data suggest that at normal concentrations rat VLDL are almost completely catabolised and taken up by the heart without the formation of LDL, while LDL is produced from human VLDL at all concentrations.     

Disparities in the interaction of rat and human lipoproteins with cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. Requirements for homology for receptor binding activity

This study characterizes the interactions of various rat and human lipoproteins with the lipoprotein cell surface receptors of rat and human cells. Iodinated rat very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), rat chylomicron remnants, rat low density lipoproteins (LDL), and rat high density lipoproteins containing predominantly apoprotein E (HDL1) bound to high affinity cell surface receptors of cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. Rat VLDL and chylomicron remnants were most avidly bound; the B-containing LDL and the E-containing HDL1 displayed lesser but similar binding. Rat HDL (d = 1.125 to 1.21) exhibited weak receptor binding; however, after recentrifugation to remove apoprotein E, they were devoid of binding activity. Competitive binding studies at 4 degrees C confirmed these results for normal lipoproteins and indicated that VLDL (B-VLDL), LDL, and HDLc (cholesterol-rich HDL1) isolated from hypercholesterolemic rats had increased affinity for the rat receptors compared with their normal counterparts, the most pronounced change being in the LDL. The cell surface receptor pathway in rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells resembled the system described for human fibroblasts as follows: 1) lipoproteins containing either the B or E apoproteins interacted with the receptors; 2) receptor binding activity was abolished by acetoacetylation or reductive methylation of a limited number of lysine residues of the lipoproteins; 3) receptor binding initiated the process of internalization and degradation of the apo-B- and apo-E-containing lipoproteins; 4) the lipoprotein cholesterol was re-esterified as determined by [14C]oleate incorporation into the cellular cholesteryl esters; and 5) receptor-mediated uptake (receptor number) was lipoprotein cholesterol. An important difference between rat and human fibroblasts was the inability of human LDL to interact with the cell surface receptors of rat fibroblasts. Rat lipoproteins did, however, react with human fibroblasts. Furthermore, the rat VLDL were the most avidly bound of the rat lipoproteins to rat fibroblasts. When the direct binding of 125I-VLDL was subjected to Scatchard analysis, the very high affinity of rat VLDL was apparent (Kd = 1 X 10(-11) M). Moreover, compared with data for rat LDL, the data suggested each VLDL particle bound to four to nine lipoprotein receptors. This multiple receptor binding could explain the enhanced binding affinity of the rat VLDL. The Scatchard plot of rat 125I-VLDL revealed a biphasic binding curve in rat and human fibroblast cells and in rat smooth muscle cells, suggesting two populations of rat VLDL. These results indicate that rat cells have a receptor pathway similar to, but not identical with, the LDL pathway of human cells. Since human LDL bind poorly to rat cell receptors on cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, metabolic studies using human lipoproteins in rats must be interpreted cautiously.     

Uptake of chylomicron remnants by the liver: further evidence for the modulating role of phospholipids

Rat lymph chylomicrons were treated with rat heparin-releasable hepatic lipase (HL) or with bovine milk lipoprotein lipase (LPL). The ability of the resulting particles to be taken up by the liver in vivo was assessed following their infusion into the portal vein of partially hepatectomized animals. The following observations were made: a) the rate of phospholipid depletion, relative to the rate of triglyceride hydrolysis, induced by HL was two- to threefold higher than that observed for LPL; b) the depletion of at least 57% of phospholipids from the surface of HL-treated chylomicrons caused no major alterations in the apoprotein profile of the particles; c) for the same extent of triglyceride hydrolysis, HL-treated chylomicrons were taken up by liver at a rate significantly higher (P less than 0.005) than LPL-treated particles; d) the liver uptake of HL-treated chylomicrons was competitively inhibited by endogenously generated chylomicron remnants, indicating that these two types of lipoproteins share the same process of recognition and uptake by liver cells. It is concluded that the in vivo changes in phospholipid content, or composition, on the surface of chylomicrons during their transformation into remnants, modulate the differentiation of these two particles by the hepatic remnant receptor.     

The very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor – a peripheral lipoprotein receptor for remnant lipoproteins into fatty acid active tissues

The VLDL (very low density lipoprotein) receptor is a member of the LDL (low density lipoprotein) receptor family. The VLDL receptor binds apolipoprotein (apo) E but not apo B, and is expressed in fatty acid active tissues (heart, muscle, adipose) and macrophages abundantly. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) modulates the binding of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoprotein particles to the VLDL receptor. By the unique ligand specificity, VLDL receptor practically appeared to function as IDL (intermediate density lipoprotein) and chylomicron remnant receptor in peripheral tissues in concert with LPL. In contrast to LDL receptor, the VLDL receptor expression is not down regulated by lipoproteins. Recently several possible functions of the VLDL receptor have been reported in lipoprotein metabolism, atherosclerosis, obesity/insulin resistance, cardiac fatty acid metabolism and neuronal migration. The gene therapy of VLDL receptor into the LDL receptor knockout mice liver showed a benefit effect for lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis. Further researches about the VLDL receptor function will be needed in the future.     

Studies on the mechanism of hypertriglyceridemia in Tangier disease. Determination of plasma lipolytic activities, k1 values and apolipoprotein composition of the major lipoprotein density classes

Mechanisms responsible for hypertriglyceridemia in Tangier disease were elucidated by an analysis of the plasma post-heparin lipolytic activities and the structural and metabolic properties of very low (VLDL) and low (LDL) density lipoproteins. The levels of lipoprotein lipase activity in six Tangier patients were significantly lower (P less than 0.001) than in 40 control subjects (8.1 +/- 3.3 (+/- S.D.) vs. 14.1 +/- 3.7 units/ml). In contrast, the levels of hepatic triacylglycerol lipase were higher (P less than 0.01) than in normal controls (14.4 +/- 3.9 vs. 9.3 +/- 4.0 units/ml). Because kinetic parameters such as Km or Vmax cannot be obtained with naturally occurring triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins, the pseudo-first-order rate constant (k1) of triacylglycerol hydrolysis was used to assess the effectiveness of triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins as substrates for lipoprotein lipase. The k1 values for Tangier VLDL (k1 = 0.017 +/- 0.002 min-1) were significantly lower (P less than 0.001) than the k1 values (0.036 +/- 0.008 min-1) for control VLDL. Both the Tangier and control LDL2 are similar in their resistance to the action of lipoprotein lipase, as shown by their low k1 values (0.002 +/- 0.001 and 0.001 +/- 0.001 min-1, respectively). The major compositional difference between the lipoproteins of Tangier disease and normal subjects was a significant increase in the percent content of apolipoprotein A-II in all lipoprotein particles with d less than 1.063 g/ml, with the greatest increase occurring in VLDL and the lowest in LDL2. These results were interpreted as indicating that, in Tangier disease, there is a lower reactivity of VLDL with lipoprotein lipase which may in part be attributed to the abnormal apolipoprotein composition. This finding, in conjunction with the reduced levels of lipoprotein lipase activity, may explain the hypertriglyceridemia in Tangier disease.     

The tissue distribution of lipoprotein lipase determines where chylomicrons bind

To determine the role of LPL for binding of lipoproteins to the vascular endothelium, and for the distribution of lipids from lipoproteins, four lines of induced mutant mice were used. Rat chylomicrons labeled in vivo with [¹⁴C]oleic acid (primarily in TGs, providing a tracer for lipolysis) and [³H]retinol (primarily in ester form, providing a tracer for the core lipids) were injected. TG label was cleared more rapidly than core label. There were no differences between the mouse lines in the rate at which core label was cleared. Two minutes after injection, about 5% of the core label, and hence chylomicron particles, were in the heart of WT mice. In mice that expressed LPL only in skeletal muscle, and had much reduced levels of LPL in the heart, binding of chylomicrons was reduced to 1%, whereas in mice that expressed LPL only in the heart, the binding was increased to over 10%. The same patterns of distribution were evident at 20 min when most of the label had been cleared. Thus, the amount of LPL expressed in muscle and heart governed both the binding of chylomicron particles and the assimilation of chylomicron lipids in the tissue.     

Differential binding of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to lipoprotein lipase.

In comparison to very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), chylomicrons are cleared quickly from plasma. However, small changes in fasting plasma VLDL concentration substantially delay postprandial chylomicron triglyceride clearance. We hypothesized that differential binding to lipoprotein lipase (LPL), the first step in the lipolytic pathway, might explain these otherwise paradoxical relationships. Competition binding assays of different lipoproteins were performed in a solid phase assay with purified bovine LPL at 4 degrees C. The results showed that chylomicrons, VLDL, and low density lipoprotein (LDL) were able to inhibit specific binding of (125)I-labeled VLDL to the same extent (85.1% +/- 13.1, 100% +/- 6.8, 90.7% +/- 23.2% inhibition, P = NS), but with markedly different efficiencies. The rank order of inhibition (K(i)) was chylomicrons (0.27 +/- 0.02 nm apoB) > VLDL (12.6 +/- 3.11 nm apoB) > LDL (34.8 +/- 11.1 nm apoB). By contrast, neither triglyceride (TG) liposomes, high density lipoprotein (HDL), nor LDL from patients with familial hypercholesterolemia were efficient at displacing the specific binding of (125)I-labeled VLDL to LPL (30%, 39%, and no displacement, respectively). Importantly, smaller hydrolyzed chylomicrons had less affinity than the larger chylomicrons (K(i) = 2.34 +/- 0.85 nm vs. 0.27 +/- 0.02 nm apoB respectively, P < 0.01). This was also true for hydrolyzed VLDL, although to a lesser extent. Chylomicrons from patients with LPL deficiency and VLDL from hypertriglyceridemic subjects were also studied. Taken together, our results indicate an inverse linear relationship between chylomicron size and K(i) whereas none was present for VLDL. We hypothesize that the differences in binding affinity demonstrated in vitro when considered with the differences in particle number observed in vivo may largely explain the paradoxes we set out to study.     

The uptake of chylomicron remnants and very low density lipoprotein remnants by the perfused rat liver

The regulation of the hepatic uptake of chylomicron remnants and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) remnants was studied in the rat using a nonrecirculating liver perfusion system. The hepatic removal of remnant lipoproteins was shown to be by receptor-mediated processes since the concentration-dependent uptake was saturable and reductive methylation of the particles reduced the uptake of each lipoprotein by two-thirds. Treatment of liver donor rats with 17 alpha-ethinyl estradiol resulted in a 2-fold increase in the hepatic uptake of VLDL remnants, while cholesterol feeding of liver donor rats caused complete suppression of the receptor-mediated uptake of VLDL remnants. Chylomicron remnant removal was unaffected by estradiol administration and only slightly diminished by cholesterol feeding. The results of competition studies also indicated that a specific chylomicron remnant receptor exists in the liver. Apoprotein E was shown to be required for the receptor-mediated uptake of both remnant lipoproteins. Chylomicron remnants which contained no apoprotein E and VLDL remnants which contained reductively methylated apoprotein E were removed by the liver to about one-third of the extent of native particles. Thus the hepatic uptake of remnant lipoproteins occurs by receptor-mediated processes and the specific removal of both particles is mediated by apoprotein E. In addition, the uptake of VLDL remnants is regulated by the same factors that control hepatic low-density lipoprotein removal, while chylomicron remnant removal is unaffected by these factors.     

The VLDL receptor plays a major role in chylomicron metabolism by enhancing LPL-mediated triglyceride hydrolysis

The VLDL receptor (VLDLr) is involved in tissue delivery of VLDL-triglyceride (TG)-derived FFA by facilitating the expression of lipoprotein lipase (LPL). However, vldlr-/- mice do not show altered plasma lipoprotein levels, despite reduced LPL expression. Because LPL activity is crucial in postprandial lipid metabolism, we investigated whether the VLDLr plays a role in chylomicron clearance. Fed plasma TG levels of vldlr-/- mice were 2.5-fold increased compared with those of vldlr+/+ littermates (1.20 +/- 0.37 mM vs. 0.47 +/- 0.18 mM; P < 0.001). Strikingly, an intragastric fat load led to a 9-fold increased postprandial TG response in vldlr-/- compared with vldlr+/+ mice (226 +/- 188 mM/h vs. 25 +/- 11 mM/h; P < 0.05). Accordingly, the plasma clearance of [3H]TG-labeled protein-free chylomicron-mimicking emulsion particles was delayed in vldlr-/- compared with vldlr+/+ mice (half-life of 12.0 +/- 2.6 min vs. 5.5 +/- 0.9 min; P < 0.05), with a 60% decreased uptake of label into adipose tissue (P < 0.05). VLDLr deficiency did not affect the plasma half-life and adipose tissue uptake of albumin-complexed [14C]FFA, indicating that the VLDLr facilitates postprandial LPL-mediated TG hydrolysis rather than mediating FFA uptake. We conclude that the VLDLr plays a major role in the metabolism of postprandial lipoproteins by enhancing LPL-mediated TG hydrolysis.     

Lipolytic degradation of human very low density lipoproteins by human milk lipoprotein lipase: the identification of lipoprotein B as the main lipoprotein degradation product

Although the direct conversion of very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) into low density (LDL) and high density (HDL) lipoproteins only requires lipoprotein lipase (LPL) as a catalyst and albumin as the fatty acid acceptor, the in vitro-formed LDL and HDL differ chemically from their native counterparts. To investigate the reason(s) for these differences, VLDL were treated with human milk LPL in the presence of albumin, and the LPL-generated LDL1-, LDL2-, and HDL-like particles were characterized by lipid and apolipoprotein composition. Results showed that the removal of apolipoproteins B, C, and E from VLDL was proportional to the degree of triglyceride hydrolysis with LDL2 particles as the major and LDL1 and HDL + VHDL particles as the minor products of a complete in vitro lipolysis of VLDL. In comparison with native counterparts, the in vitro-formed LDL2 and HDL + VHDL were characterized by lower levels of triglyceride and cholesterol ester and higher levels of free cholesterol and lipid phosphorus. The characterization of lipoprotein particles present in the in vitro-produced LDL2 showed that, as in plasma LDL2, lipoprotein B (LP-B) was the major apolipoprotein B-containing lipoprotein accounting for over 90% of the total apolipoprotein B. Other, minor species of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins included LP-B:C-I:E and LP-B:C-I:C-II:C-III. The lipid composition of in vitro-formed LP-B closely resembled that of plasma LP-B. The major parts of apolipoproteins C and E present in VLDL were released to HDL + VHDL as simple, cholesterol/phospholipid-rich lipoproteins including LP-C-I, LP-C-II, LP-C-III, and LP-E. However, some of these same simple lipoprotein particles were present after ultracentrifugation in the LDL2 density segment because of their hydrated density and/or because they formed, in the absence of naturally occurring acceptors (LP-A-I:A-II), weak associations with LP-B. Thus, the presence of varying amounts of these cholesterol/phospholipid-rich lipoproteins in the in vitro-formed LDL2 appears to be the main reason for their compositional difference from native LDL2. These results demonstrate that the formation of LP-B as the major apolipoprotein B-containing product of VLDL lipolysis only requires LPL as a catalyst and albumin as the fatty acid acceptor. However, under physiological circumstances, other modulating agents are necessary to prevent the accumulation and interaction of phospholipid/cholesterol-rich apolipoprotein C- and E-containing particles.     

Stimulation of hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis by fatty acids. Effects of oleate on cytoplasmic acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, acetoacetyl-CoA synthetase and hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase.

The effects of oleic acid on the activities of cytosolic HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA) synthase, AcAc-CoA (acetoacetyl-CoA) thiolase and AcAc-CoA synthetase, as well as microsomal HMG-CoA reductase, all enzymes in the pathway of cholesterol biosynthesis, were studied in the isolated perfused rat liver. Oleic acid bound to bovine serum albumin, or albumin alone, was infused for 4 h at a rate sufficient to sustain an average concentration of 0.61 +/- 0.05 mM fatty acid during the perfusion. Hepatic cytosol and microsomal fractions were isolated at the termination of the perfusion. Oleic acid simultaneously increased the activities of the cytosolic cholesterol-biosynthetic enzymes 1.4-2.7-fold in livers from normal fed rats and from animals fasted for 24 h. These effects were accompanied by increased net secretion by the liver of cholesterol and triacylglycerol in the very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL). We confirmed the observations reported previously from this laboratory of the stimulation by oleic acid of microsomal HMG-CoA reductase. In cytosols from perfused livers, the increase in AcAc-CoA thiolase activity was characterized by an increase in Vmax. without any change in the apparent Km of the enzyme for AcAc-CoA. In contrast, oleic acid decreased the Km of HMG-CoA synthase for Ac-CoA, without alteration of the Vmax. of the enzyme. The Vmax. of AcAc-CoA synthetase was increased by oleic acid, and there was a trend towards a small increase in the Km of the enzyme for acetoacetate. These data allow us to conclude that the enzymes that supply the HMG-CoA required for hepatic cholesterogenesis are stimulated, as is HMG-CoA reductase, by a physiological substrate, fatty acid, that increases rates of hepatic cholesterol synthesis and cholesterol secretion. Furthermore, we suggest that these effects of fatty acid on hepatic cholesterol metabolism result from stimulation of secretion of triacylglycerol in the VLDL by fatty acids, and the absolute requirement of cholesterol as an important structural surface component of the VLDL necessary for transport of triacylglycerol from the liver.     

Release of endothelial cell lipoprotein lipase by plasma lipoproteins and free fatty acids

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) bound to the lumenal surface of vascular endothelial cells is responsible for the hydrolysis of triglycerides in plasma lipoproteins. Studies were performed to investigate whether human plasma lipoproteins and/or free fatty acids would release LPL which was bound to endothelial cells. Purified bovine milk LPL was incubated with cultured porcine aortic endothelial cells resulting in the association of enzyme activity with the cells. When the cells were then incubated with media containing chylomicrons or very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), a concentration-dependent decrease in the cell-associated LPL enzymatic activity was observed. In contrast, incubation with media containing low density lipoproteins or high density lipoproteins produced a much smaller decrease in the cell-associated enzymatic activity. The addition of increasing molar ratios of oleic acid:bovine serum albumin to the media also reduced enzyme activity associated with the endothelial cells. To determine whether the decrease in LPL activity was due to release of the enzyme from the cells or inactivation of the enzyme, studies were performed utilizing radioiodinated bovine LPL. Radiolabeled LPL protein was released from endothelial cells by chylomicrons, VLDL, and by free fatty acids (i.e. oleic acid bound to bovine serum albumin). The release of radiolabeled LPL by VLDL correlated with the generation of free fatty acids from the hydrolysis of VLDL triglyceride by LPL bound to the cells. Inhibition of LPL enzymatic activity by use of a specific monoclonal antibody, reduced the extent of release of 125I-LPL from the endothelial cells by the added VLDL. These results demonstrated that LPL enzymatic activity and protein were removed from endothelial cells by triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (chylomicrons and VLDL) and oleic acid. We postulate that similar mechanisms may be important in the regulation of LPL activity at the vascular endothelium.