Upland rice and lowland rice exhibited different PIP expression under water deficit and ABA treatment

Aquaporins play a significant role in plant water relations. To further understand the aquaporin function in plants under water stress, the expression of a subgroup of aquaporins, plasma membrane intrinsic proteins （PIPs）, was studied at both the protein and mRNA level in upland rice （Oryza sativa L. cv. Zhonghan 3） and lowland rice （Oryza sativa L. cv. Xiushui 63） when they were water stressed by treatment with 20% polyethylene glycol （PEG）. Plants responded differently to 20% PEG treatment. Leaf water content of upland rice leaves was reduced rapidly. PIP protein level increased markedly in roots of both types, but only in leaves of upland rice after 10 h of PEG treatment. At the mRNA level, OsPIP1,2, OsPIP1,3, OsPIP2;1 and OsPIP2;5 in roots as well as OsPIP1,2 and OsPIP1;3 in leaves were significantly up-regulated in upland rice, whereas the corresponding genes remained unchanged or down-regulated in lowland rice. Meanwhile, we observed a significant increase in the endogenous abscisic acid （ABA） level in upland rice but not in lowland rice under water deficit. Treatment with 60 μM ABA enhanced the expression of OsPIP1;2, OsPIP2;5 and OsPIP2;6 in roots and OsPIP1;2, OsPIP2;4 and OsPIP2;6 in leaves of upland rice. The responsiveness of PIP genes to water stress and ABA were different, implying that the regulation of PIP genes involves both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling oathways during water deficit.     

Role of the Aquaporin PIP1 Subfamily in the Chilling Tolerance of Rice

Although an association between chilling tolerance and aquaporinshas been reported, the exact mechanisms involved in this relationshipremain unclear. We compared the expression profiles of aquaporingenes between a chilling-tolerant and a low temperature-sensitiverice variety using real-time PCR and identified seven genesthat closely correlated with chilling tolerance. Chemical treatmentexperiments, by which rice plants were induced to lose theirchilling tolerance, implicated the PIP1 (plasma membrane intrinsicprotein 1) subfamily member genes in chilling tolerance. Ofthese members, changes in expression of the OsPIP1;3 gene suggestedthis to be the most closely related to chilling tolerance. AlthoughOsPIP1;3 showed a much lower water permeability than membersof the OsPIP2 family, OsPIP1;3 enhanced the water permeabilityof OsPIP2;2 and OsPIP2;4 when co-expressed with either of theseproteins in oocytes. Transgenic rice plants (OE1) overexpressingOsPIP1;3 showed an enhanced level of chilling tolerance andthe ability to maintain high OsPIP1;3 expression levels underlow temperature treatment, similar to that of chilling-tolerantrice plants. We assume that OsPIP1;3, constitutively overexpressedin the leaf and root of transgenic OE1 plants, interacts withmembers of the OsPIP2 subfamily, thereby improving the plants’water balance under low temperatures and resulting in the observedchilling tolerance of the plants.     

Ectopic expression of a rice plasma membrane intrinsic protein (OsPIP1;3) promotes plant growth and water uptake

Plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) are known to be major facilitators of the movement of a number of substrates across cell membranes. From a drought‐resistant cultivar of Oryza sativa (rice), we isolated an OsPIP1;3 gene single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) that is mostly expressed in rice roots and is strongly responsive to drought stress. Immunocytochemistry showed that OsPIP1;3 majorly accumulated on the proximal end of the endodermis and the cell surface around the xylem. Expression of GFP‐OsPIP1;3 alone in Xenopus oocytes or rice protoplasts showed OsPIP1;3 mislocalization in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)‐like neighborhood, whereas co‐expression of OsPIP2;2 recruited OsPIP1;3 to the plasma membrane and led to a significant enhancement of water permeability in oocytes. Moreover, reconstitution of 10×His‐OsPIP1;3 in liposomes demonstrated water channel activity, as revealed by stopped‐flow light scattering. Intriguingly, by patch‐clamp technique, we detected significant NO₃^? conductance of OsPIP1;3 in mammalian cells. To investigate the physiological functions of OsPIP1;3, we ectopically expressed the OsPIP1;3 gene in Nicotiana benthamiana (tobacco). The transgenic tobacco plants exhibited higher photosynthesis rates, root hydraulic conductivity (Lp_r) and water‐use efficiency, resulting in a greater biomass and a higher resistance to water deficit than the wild‐type did. Further experiments suggested that heterologous expression of OsPIP1;3 in cyanobacterium altered bacterial growth under different conditions of CO₂ gas supply. Overall, besides shedding light on the multiple functions played by OsPIP1;3, this work provides insights into the translational value of plant AQPs.     

A proteomic approach to analyze salt-responsive proteins in rice leaf sheath

To examine the response of rice to salt stress, changes in protein expression were analyzed using a proteomic approach. To investigate dose- and time-dependent responses, rice seedlings were exposed to 50, 100 and 150 mM NaCl for 6 to 48 h. Proteins were extracted from leaf sheath and separated by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Eight proteins showed 1- to 3-fold up-regulation in leaf sheath, in response to 50 mM NaCl for 24 h. Among these, three proteins were unidentified (LSY081, LSY262 and LSY363) while five proteins were identified as fructose bisphosphate aldolases, photosystem II (PSII) oxygen evolving complex protein, oxygen evolving enhancer protein 2 (OEE2) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). The maximum expression levels of seven proteins were at 24 h. Their expression declined after 48 h of 50 mM NaCl treatment. In contrast, SOD maintained its elevated expression throughout these conditions. The increased expression of proteins seen in the 50 mM NaCl treatment group was less pronounced in the groups receiving 100 or 150 mM NaCl for 24 h. The expression of SOD was a common response to cold, drought, salt and abscisic acid (ABA) stresses while the expression of LSY081, LSY363 and OEE2 was enhanced by salt and ABA stresses. LSY262 was expressed in leaf sheath and root, while fructose bisphosphate aldolases, PSII oxygen evolving complex protein and OEE2 were expressed in leaf sheath and leaf blade. LSY363 was expressed in leaf sheath but was below the level of detection in leaf blade and root. These results indicate that specific proteins expressed in specific regions of rice show a coordinated response to salt stress.     

5个毛果杨PtrZFP基因的鉴定和表达分析

ZFP转录因子是植物中的一类具有指环结构域的转录因子。从毛果杨中鉴定出5条ZFP基因（命名为PtrZFP1-5）,对其特性和表达模式进行了分析,以期初步了解这些基因是否能对胁迫做出应答。对PtrZFP1-5基因进行生物学分析,进一步利用qRT-PCR技术分析NaCl、PEG₆₀₀₀和ABA胁迫处理后毛果杨根、茎和叶中5条基因的表达情况。PtrZFP1-5基因编码蛋白氨基酸残基数为258~338 aa,编码蛋白的分子量为27.7~37.3 kDa,理论等电点为4.87~8.61,5个基因不均等的分布在毛果杨基因组的3条染色体上。qRT-PCR结果显示,0.2 mol·L^-1 NaCl、15%（w/v）PEG6000和100 μmol·L^-1 ABA胁迫处理后,5个PtrZFP基因在毛果杨根、茎和叶中的表达模式明显不同。PtrZFP1基因在3种胁迫后毛果杨中均被明显的上调表达;PtrZFP2基因在盐、渗透和ABA胁迫处理后,叶中的表达都明显被抑制;PtrZFP3基因受到干旱胁迫时在根中的响应最为明显;而叶和茎中,表达量在大部分胁迫的大部分时间点无明显改变。PtrZFP4基因也能在根和茎中对干旱胁迫做出明显应答。PtrZFP5基因在经受盐和ABA胁迫后,在叶中的表达受到明显抑制。PtrZFP1-5这5个基因至少能在一种器官中对一种胁迫处理做出应答,但参与的胁迫应答类型和机制可能不同。     

Drought, abscisic acid and transpiration rate effects on the regulation of PIP aquaporin gene expression and abundance in Phaseolus vulgaris plants

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Drought causes a decline of root hydraulic conductance, which aside from embolisms, is governed ultimately by aquaporins. Multiple factors probably regulate aquaporin expression, abundance and activity in leaf and root tissues during drought; among these are the leaf transpiration rate, leaf water status, abscisic acid (ABA) and soil water content. Here a study is made of how these factors could influence the response of aquaporin to drought. METHODS: Three plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) or aquaporins were cloned from Phaseolus vulgaris plants and their expression was analysed after 4 d of water deprivation and also 1 d after re-watering. The effects of ABA and of methotrexate (MTX), an inhibitor of stomatal opening, on gene expression and protein abundance were also analysed. Protein abundance was examined using antibodies against PIP1 and PIP2 aquaporins. At the same time, root hydraulic conductance (L), transpiration rate, leaf water status and ABA tissue concentration were measured. KEY RESULTS: None of the treatments (drought, ABA or MTX) changed the leaf water status or tissue ABA concentration. The three treatments caused a decline in the transpiration rate and raised PVPIP2;1 gene expression and PIP1 protein abundance in the leaves. In the roots, only the drought treatment raised the expression of the three PIP genes examined, while at the same time diminishing PIP2 protein abundance and L. On the other hand, ABA raised both root PIP1 protein abundance and L. CONCLUSIONS: The rise of PvPIP2;1 gene expression and PIP1 protein abundance in the leaves of P. vulgaris plants subjected to drought was correlated with a decline in the transpiration rate. At the same time, the increase in the expression of the three PIP genes examined caused by drought and the decline of PIP2 protein abundance in the root tissues were not correlated with any of the parameters measured.     

Aquaporins in developing rice grains

During rice grain filling, grain moisture content and weight show dynamic changes. We focused on the expression of all 33 rice aquaporins in developing grains. Only two aquaporin genes, OsPIP2;1 and OsTIP3;1, were highly expressed in the period 10–25 days after heading (DAH). High-temperature treatment from 7 to 21 DAH abolished the dynamic up-regulation of OsPIP2;1 in the period 15–20 DAH, whereas OsTIP3;1 expression was not affected. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that OsPIP2;1 was present in the starchy endosperm, nucellar projection, nucellar epidermis, and dorsal vascular bundles, but not in the aleurone layer. OsTIP3;1 was present in the aleurone layer and starchy endosperm. Water transport activity of recombinant OsTIP3;1 was low, in contrast to the high activity of recombinant OsPIP2;1 we reported previously. Our data suggest that OsPIP2;1 and OsTIP3;1 have distinct roles in developing grains.