Protein kinase C phosphorylates RGS2 and modulates its capacity for negative regulation of Galpha 11 signaling

RGS proteins (regulators of G protein signaling) attenuate heterotrimeric G protein signaling by functioning as both GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) and inhibitors of G protein/effector interaction. RGS2 has been shown to regulate Galpha(q)-mediated inositol lipid signaling. Although purified RGS2 blocks PLC-beta activation by the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog guanosine 5'-O-thiophosphate (GTPgammaS), its capacity to regulate inositol lipid signaling under conditions where GTPase-promoted hydrolysis of GTP is operative has not been fully explored. Utilizing the turkey erythrocyte membrane model of inositol lipid signaling, we investigated regulation by RGS2 of both GTP and GTPgammaS-stimulated Galpha(11) signaling. Different inhibitory potencies of RGS2 were observed under conditions assessing its activity as a GAP versus as an effector antagonist; i.e. RGS2 was a 10-20-fold more potent inhibitor of aluminum fluoride and GTP-stimulated PLC-betat activity than of GTPgammaS-promoted PLC-betat activity. We also examined whether RGS2 was regulated by downstream components of the inositol lipid signaling pathway. RGS2 was phosphorylated by PKC in vitro to a stoichiometry of approximately unity by both a mixture of PKC isozymes and individual calcium and phospholipid-dependent PKC isoforms. Moreover, RGS2 was phosphorylated in intact COS7 cells in response to PKC activation by 4beta-phorbol 12beta-myristate 13alpha-acetate and, to a lesser extent, by the P2Y(2) receptor agonist UTP. In vitro phosphorylation of RGS2 by PKC decreased its capacity to attenuate both GTP and GTPgammaS-stimulated PLC-betat activation, with the extent of attenuation correlating with the level of RGS2 phosphorylation. A phosphorylation-dependent inhibition of RGS2 GAP activity was also observed in proteoliposomes reconstituted with purified P2Y(1) receptor and Galpha(q)betagamma. These results identify for the first time a phosphorylation-induced change in the activity of an RGS protein and suggest a mechanism for potentiation of inositol lipid signaling by PKC.     

Structural and functional evolution of the P2Y12-like receptor group

Metabotropic pyrimidine and purine nucleotide receptors (P2Y receptors) belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). They are distinguishable from adenosine receptors (P1) as they bind adenine and/or uracil nucleotide triphosphates or diphosphates depending on the subtype. Over the past decade, P2Y receptors have been cloned from a variety of tissues and species, and as many as eight functional subtypes have been characterized. Most recently, several members of the P2Y₁₂-like receptor group, which includes the clopidogrel-sensitive ADP receptor P2Y₁₂, have been deorphanized. The P2Y₁₂-like receptor group comprises several structurally related GPCR which, however, display heterogeneous agonist specificity including nucleotides, their derivatives, and lipids. Besides the established function of P2Y₁₂ in platelet activation, expression in macrophages, neuronal and glial cells as well as recent results from functional studies implicate that several members of this group may have specific functions in neurotransmission, inflammation, chemotaxis, and response to tissue injury. This review focuses specifically on the structure-function relation and shortly summarizes some aspects of the physiological relevance of P2Y₁₂-like receptor members.     

The P2Y12 Antagonists, 2-Methylthioadenosine 5��-Monophosphate Triethylammonium Salt and Cangrelor (ARC69931MX), Can Inhibit Human Platelet Aggregation through a Gi-independent Increase in cAMP Levels

ADP plays an integral role in the process of hemostasis by signaling through two platelet G-protein-coupled receptors, P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂. The recent use of antagonists against these two receptors has contributed a substantial body of data characterizing the ADP signaling pathways in human platelets. Specifically, the results have indicated that although P2Y₁ receptors are involved in the initiation of platelet aggregation, P2Y₁₂ receptor activation appears to account for the bulk of the ADP-mediated effects. Based on this consideration, emphasis has been placed on the development of a new class of P2Y₁₂ antagonists (separate from clopidogrel and ticlopidine) as an approach to the treatment of thromboembolic disorders. The present work examined the molecular mechanisms by which two of these widely used adenosine-based P2Y₁₂ antagonists (2-methylthioadenosine 5′-monophosphate triethylammonium salt (2MeSAMP) and ARC69931MX), inhibit human platelet activation. It was found that both of these compounds raise platelet cAMP to levels that substantially inhibit platelet aggregation. Furthermore, the results demonstrated that this elevation of cAMP did not require G_i signaling or functional P2Y₁₂ receptors but was mediated through activation of a separate G protein-coupled pathway, presumably involving G_s. However, additional experiments revealed that neither 2MeSAMP nor ARC69931MX (cangrelor) increased cAMP through activation of A2a, IP, DP, or EP₂ receptors, which are known to couple to G_s. Collectively, these findings indicate that 2MeSAMP and ARC69931MX interact with an unidentified platelet G protein-coupled receptor that stimulates cAMP-mediated inhibition of platelet function. This inhibition is in addition to that derived from antagonism of P2Y₁₂ receptors.Upon damage to the endothelial layer of the blood vessel wall, the underlying subendothelium is exposed to platelets in the blood, initiating a cascade of signaling events resulting in the transformation of “resting” platelets into “activated” platelets (1). One significant characteristic associated with these signaling events is the secretion of ADP from the platelet-dense granules (2). This released ADP acts to further amplify the platelet activation response by interacting with its G-protein-coupled receptors on the platelet surface, namely P2Y₁ (coupled to G_q) and P2Y₁₂ (coupled to G_i) (3–5). The consequence of platelet activation through ADP is a conformational change in the platelet membrane glycoprotein αIIbβ3 (6, 7), which then binds to fibrinogen present in the plasma. The binding of fibrinogen with αIIbβ3 on the surface of adjacent platelets results in fibrinogen-platelet cross-linking and the formation of a hemostatic plug at the site of vascular injury (8).Consequently, ADP is thought to play an integral role in the normal process of hemostasis. Of the two ADP-receptor signaling pathways in platelets, evidence has indicated that ADP-mediated P2Y₁₂ signaling appears to play a more prominent role in platelet activation than ADP-mediated P2Y₁ signaling (9, 10). For the most part, support for this notion derives from the use of the adenosine-based P2Y₁₂ antagonists (i.e. 2MeSAMP⁴ and ARC69931MX), which have a much broader inhibitory profile than P2Y₁ antagonists (e.g. A3P5P (adenosine-3′-phosphate-5′-phosphate) or MRS2179) (9). Thus, 2MeSAMP and ARC69931MX inhibit platelet aggregation in response to multiple agonists, such as thromboxane A₂, collagen, thrombin, etc. (11–13), whereas P2Y₁ antagonists do not. On the other hand, this general requirement for P2Y₁₂ signaling seems to be inconsistent with earlier reports indicating that activation of certain platelet receptors (e.g. thromboxane A₂ receptor) can cause aggregation through ADP-independent mechanisms (14, 15). Based on this apparent inconsistency in the contribution of P2Y₁₂ signaling to the overall platelet activation response, the present study investigated the possibility that the broad spectrum of inhibitory activity of this new generation of P2Y₁₂ antagonists (i.e. MeSAMP and ARC69931MX) may derive from an elevation in platelet cAMP levels.Our data demonstrated that both 2MeSAMP and ARC69931MX do in fact significantly raise human platelet cAMP. Furthermore, this pharmacological effect is independent of P2Y₁₂-G_i signaling and appears to proceed through activation of a separate G_s-coupled platelet receptor. Taken together, the results therefore indicate that these adenosine-based P2Y₁₂ antagonists can produce their inhibition of platelet function through a cAMP-mediated mechanism.     

Differential Modulation of ��- and ��-Opioid Receptor Agonists by Endogenous RGS4 Protein in SH-SY5Y Cells

Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are a family of molecules that control the duration of G protein signaling. A variety of RGS proteins have been reported to modulate opioid receptor signaling. Here we show that RGS4 is abundantly expressed in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells that endogenously express μ- and δ-opioid receptors and test the hypothesis that the activity of opioids in these cells is modulated by RGS4. Endogenous RGS4 protein was reduced by ∼90% in SH-SY5Y cells stably expressing short hairpin RNA specifically targeted to RGS4. In these cells, the potency and maximal effect of δ-opioid receptor agonist (SNC80)-mediated inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation was increased compared with control cells. This effect was reversed by transient transfection of a stable RGS4 mutant (HA-RGS4C2S). Furthermore, MAPK activation by SNC80 was increased in cells with knockdown of RGS4. In contrast, there was no change in the μ-opioid (morphine) response at adenylyl cyclase or MAPK. FLAG-tagged opioid receptors and HA-RGS4C2S were transiently expressed in HEK293T cells, and co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the δ-opioid receptor but not the μ-opioid receptor could be precipitated together with the stable RGS4. Using chimeras of the δ- and μ-opioid receptors, the C-tail and third intracellular domain of the δ-opioid receptor were suggested to be the sites of interaction with RGS4. The findings demonstrate a role for endogenous RGS4 protein in modulating δ-opioid receptor signaling in SH-SY5Y cells and provide evidence for a receptor-specific effect of RGS4.μ- and δ-opioid receptors are members of the G protein-coupled receptor family and interact with Gα_i/o proteins (1, 2). This results in signaling to a variety of downstream effectors, including adenylyl cyclase and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)² cascade. Signaling of opioid receptors is regulated negatively by regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins (3, 4). These are a family of molecules containing a “RGS consensus” domain that bind to Gα subunits and act as GTPase-accelerating proteins to increase the rate of GTP hydrolysis. This results in a decrease in the lifetime of the active Gα-GTP and free Gβγ subunits and limits signaling to downstream effectors (5–8). The mechanisms by which RGS proteins selectively modulate G protein-mediated receptor signal transduction pathways, especially opioid receptor signaling, are beginning to unfold (9–12). The foundation for the function and selectivity of RGS proteins in regulating opioid signaling lies in their ability to interact with opioid receptors and their cognate G proteins. In general, the selectivity or the preference of an RGS protein for a particular receptor is determined by a variety of factors, including tissue-specific expression and precise interaction with the intracellular domains of receptor proteins, G protein subunits, and effectors as well as other pathway-specific components (13).The effects of RGS proteins on opioid receptor signaling have been examined in several systems. The findings are not always consistent, probably due to the different methodologies used. It has been shown that members of the RZ, R4, and R7 subfamilies (7) of RGS proteins play crucial roles not only in terminating acute opioid agonist action but also in opioid receptor desensitization, internalization, recycling, and degradation (3, 14), thereby affecting opioid tolerance and dependence (15–18). Much work has been performed with RGS4, because it is a smaller RGS protein with a structure consisting of the RGS consensus (box) sequence and a small N terminus (19, 20). It also has a wide distribution in the brain, especially in brain regions important for opioid actions, including the striatum, locus coeruleus, dorsal horn of the spinal cord, and cerebral cortex (21). In vitro RGS4 has been shown to reverse δ-opioid receptor agonist-induced inhibition of cAMP synthesis in membranes prepared from NG108-15 cells (6). Overexpression of RGS4 in HEK293 cells also attenuated morphine-, [d-Ala²,N-Me-Phe⁴,Gly-ol⁵]enkephalin (DAMGO)-, and [d-Pen²,d-Pen⁵]enkephalin (DPDPE)-induced inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (22, 23). Co-expression of RGS4 with GIRK1/GIRK2 channels in Xenopus oocytes reduced the basal K⁺ current and accelerated the deactivation of GIRK channels activated by κ-opioid receptor agonist {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"U69593","term_id":"4205069","term_text":"U69593"}}U69593 (24). Although these previous studies have provided evidence that RGS4 can negatively regulate opioid receptor signaling, they do not confirm a functional role for endogenous RGS4 in endogenous, nontransfected systems.Human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells endogenously express μ- and δ-opioid receptors and a variety of Gα_i/o proteins (25–27). Here we show that RGS4 is abundantly found at both the mRNA and protein levels in these cells. Consequently, we used SH-SY5Y cells to examine the hypothesis that RGS4 negatively modulates opioid receptor signaling under physiological conditions. The endogenously expressed RGS4 level in SH-SY5Y cells was reduced using lentiviral delivery of short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting the RGS4 gene. This resulted in changes in δ- but not μ-opioid receptor-mediated signaling to adenylyl cyclase and the MAPK pathway. These findings argue for a selective interaction of RGS4 with the δ-opioid receptor. To test this, we expressed FLAG-tagged μ- and δ-opioid receptors together with a construct for a stable, proteosome-resistant RGS4 protein in HEK293T cells. Co-immunoprecipitation indicated that the δ-opioid but not the μ-opioid receptor was closely associated with RGS4, providing further evidence for a selective interaction between RGS4 and δ-opioid receptor signaling.     

5-HT1A receptor-mediated phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) is modulated by regulator of G protein signaling protein 19

The 5-HT1A receptor is a G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that activates G proteins of the Gαi/o family. 5-HT1A receptors expressed in the raphe, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex are implicated in the control of mood and are targets for anti-depressant drugs. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are members of a large family that play important roles in signal transduction downstream of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). The main role of RGS proteins is to act as GTPase accelerating proteins (GAPs) to dampen or negatively regulate GPCR-mediated signaling. We have shown that a mouse expressing Gαi2 that is insensitive to all RGS protein GAP activity has an anti-depressant-like phenotype due to increased signaling of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors, thus implicating the 5-HT1A receptor–Gαi2 complex as an important target. Here we confirm that RGS proteins act as GAPs to regulate signaling to adenylate cyclase and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway downstream of the 5-HT1A receptor, using RGS-insensitive Gαi2 protein expressed in C6 cells. We go on to use short hairpin RNA (shRNA) to show that RGS19 is responsible for the GAP activity in C6 cells and also that RGS19 acts as a GAP for 5-HT1A receptor signaling in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells and primary hippocampal neurons. In addition, in both cell types the synergy between 5-HT1A receptor and the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 in stimulating the MAPK pathway is enhanced following shRNA reduction of RGS19 expression. Thus RGS19 may be a viable new target for anti-depressant medications.     

The fate of P2Y-related orphan receptors: GPR80/99 and GPR91 are receptors of dicarboxylic acids

Several orphan G protein-coupled receptors are structurally close to the family of P2Y nucleotide receptors: GPR80/99 and GPR91 are close to P2Y_1/2/4/6/11 receptors, whereas GPR87, H963 and GPR34 are close to P2Y_12/13/14. Over the years, several laboratories have attempted without success to identify the ligands of those receptors. In early 2004, two papers have been published: One claiming that GPR80/99 is an AMP receptor, called P2Y₁₅, and the other one showing that GPR80/99 is a receptor for -ketoglutarate, while GPR91 is a succinate receptor. The accompanying paper by Qi et al. entirely supports that GPR80/99 is an -ketoglutarate receptor and not an AMP receptor. The closeness of dicarboxylic acid and P2Y nucleotide receptors might be linked to the negative charges of both types of ligands and the involvement of conserved Arg residues in their neutralization.     

Opioid-induced down-regulation of RGS4: role of ubiquitination and implications for receptor cross-talk

Regulator of G protein signaling protein 4 (RGS4) acts as a GTPase accelerating protein to modulate μ- and δ- opioid receptor (MOR and DOR, respectively) signaling. In turn, exposure to MOR agonists leads to changes in RGS4 at the mRNA and/or protein level. Here we have used human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells that endogenously express MOR, DOR, and RGS4 to study opioid-mediated down-regulation of RGS4. Overnight treatment of SH-SY5Y cells with the MOR agonist DAMGO or the DOR agonist DPDPE decreased RGS4 protein by ～60% accompanied by a profound loss of opioid receptors but with no change in RGS4 mRNA. The decrease in RGS4 protein was prevented by the pretreatment with pertussis toxin or the opioid antagonist naloxone. The agonist-induced down-regulation of RGS4 proteins was completely blocked by treatment with the proteasome inhibitors MG132 or lactacystin or high concentrations of leupeptin, indicating involvement of ubiquitin-proteasome and lysosomal degradation. Polyubiquitinated RGS4 protein was observed in the presence of MG132 or the specific proteasome inhibitor lactacystin and promoted by opioid agonist. The loss of opioid receptors was not prevented by MG132, demonstrating a different degradation pathway. RGS4 is a GTPase accelerating protein for both Gα(i/o) and Gα(q) proteins. After overnight treatment with DAMGO to reduce RGS4 protein, signaling at the Gα(i/o)-coupled DOR and the Gα(q)-coupled M(3) muscarinic receptor (M(3)R) was increased but not signaling of the α(2) adrenergic receptor or bradykinin BK(2) receptor, suggesting the development of cross-talk between the DOR and M(3)R involving RGS4.     

Differential agonist-induced desensitization of P2Y2 nucleotide receptors by ATP and UTP

The equal potency and efficacy of the agonists, ATP and UTP, pharmacologically distinguish the P2Y₂ receptor from other nucleotide receptors. Investigation of the desensitization of the P2Y₂ receptors is complicated by the simultaneous expression of different P2 nucleotide receptor subtypes. The co-expression of multiple P2 receptor subtypes in mammalian cells may have led to contradictory reports on the efficacy of the natural agonists of the P2Y₂ receptor to induce desensitization. We decided to investigate the desensitization of human and murine isoforms of the P2Y₂ receptor, and to rigorously examine their signaling and desensitization properties. For these purposes, we used 1321N1 astrocytoma cells stably transfected with the human or murine P2Y₂ receptor cDNA, as well as human A431 cells that endogenously express the receptor. The mobilization of intracellular calcium by extracellular nucleotides was used as a functional assay for the P2Y₂ receptors. While ATP and UTP activated the murine and human P2Y₂ receptors with similar potencies (EC₅₀ values were 1.5-5.8 M), ATP was ~ 10-fold less potent (IC₅₀ = 9.1-21.2 M) than UTP (IC₅₀ = 0.7-2.9 M) inducing homologous receptor desensitization in the cell systems examined. Individual cell analyses of the rate and dose dependency of agonist-induced desensitization demonstrated that the murine receptor was slightly more resistant to desensitization than its human counterpart. To our knowledge, this is the first individual cell study that has compared the cellular heterogeneity of the desensitized states of recombinant and endogenously expressed receptors. This comparison demonstrated that the recombinant system conserved the cellular regulatory elements needed to attenuate receptor signaling by desensitization.     

The Repertoire of Heterotrimeric G Proteins and RGS Proteins in Ciona intestinalis

Background

Heterotrimeric G proteins and regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are key downstream interacting partners in the G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathway. The highly versatile GPCR transmembrane signaling system is a consequence of the coupling of a diverse set of receptors to downstream partners that include multiple subforms of G proteins and regulatory proteins including RGS proteins, among others. While the GPCR repertoire of Ciona intestinalis, representing the basal chordate is known, the repertoire of the heterotrimeric G proteins and RGS proteins is unknown.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In the present study, we performed an in-silico genome-wide search of C. intestinalis for its complement of G proteins and RGS proteins. The identification of several one-to-one orthologs of human G proteins at the levels of families, subfamilies and types and of homologs of the human RGS proteins suggests an evolutionarily conserved structure function relationship of the GPCR signaling mechanism in the chordates.

Conclusions

The C. intestinalis genome encodes a highly conserved, albeit, limited repertoire of the heterotrimeric G protein complexes with the size of subunit types comparable with that in lower eukaryotes.     

Differential expression of P2Y receptors in the rat cochlea during development

Purinergic signaling has broad physiological significance to the hearing organ, involving signal transduction via ionotropic P2X receptors and metabotropic G-protein-coupled P2Y and P1 (adenosine), alongside conversion of nucleotides and nucleosides by ecto-nucleotidases and ecto-nucleoside diphosphokinase. In addition, ATP release is modulated by acoustic overstimulation or stress and involves feedback regulation. Many of these principal elements of the purinergic signaling complex have been well characterized in the cochlea, while the characterization of P2Y receptor expression is emerging. The present study used immunohistochemistry to evaluate the expression of five P2Y receptors, P2Y₁, P2Y₂, P2Y₄, P2Y₆, and P2Y₁₂, during development of the rat cochlea. Commencing in the late embryonic period, the P2Y receptors studied were found in the cells lining the cochlear partition, associated with establishment of the electrochemical environment which provides the driving force for sound transduction. In addition, early postnatal P2Y₂ and P2Y₄ protein expression in the greater epithelial ridge, part of the developing hearing organ, supports the view that initiation and regulation of spontaneous activity in the hair cells prior to hearing onset is mediated by purinergic signaling. Sub-cellular compartmentalization of P2Y receptor expression in sensory hair cells, and diversity of receptor expression in the spiral ganglion neurons and their satellite cells, indicates roles for P2Y receptor-mediated Ca²⁺-signaling in sound transduction and auditory neuron excitability. Overall, the dynamics of P2Y receptor expression during development of the cochlea complement the other elements of the purinergic signaling complex and reinforce the significance of extracellular nucleotide and nucleoside signaling to hearing.     

Development of selective agonists and antagonists of P2Y receptors

Although elucidation of the medicinal chemistry of agonists and antagonists of the P2Y receptors has lagged behind that of many other members of group A G protein-coupled receptors, detailed qualitative and quantitative structure–activity relationships (SARs) were recently constructed for several of the subtypes. Agonists selective for P2Y₁, P2Y₂, and P2Y₆ receptors and nucleotide antagonists selective for P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ receptors are now known. Selective nonnucleotide antagonists were reported for P2Y₁, P2Y₂, P2Y₆, P2Y₁₁, P2Y₁₂, and P2Y₁₃ receptors. At the P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ receptors, nucleotide agonists (5′-diphosphate derivatives) were converted into antagonists of nanomolar affinity by altering the phosphate moieties, with a focus particularly on the ribose conformation and substitution pattern. Nucleotide analogues with conformationally constrained ribose-like rings were introduced as selective receptor probes for P2Y₁ and P2Y₆ receptors. Screening chemically diverse compound libraries has begun to yield new lead compounds for the development of P2Y receptor antagonists, such as competitive P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists with antithrombotic activity. Selective agonists for the P2Y₄, P2Y₁₁, and P2Y₁₃ receptors and selective antagonists for P2Y₄ and P2Y₁₄ receptors have not yet been identified. The P2Y₁₄ receptor appears to be the most restrictive of the class with respect to modification of the nucleobase, ribose, and phosphate moieties. The continuing process of ligand design for the P2Y receptors will aid in the identification of new clinical targets.     

Functional interaction between purinergic receptors: effect of ligands for A2A and P2Y12 receptors on P2Y1 receptor function

A_2A adenosine receptor (A_2AR), P2Y₁ receptor (P2Y₁R) and P2Y₁₂ receptor (P2Y₁₂R) are predominantly expressed on human platelets. The individual role of each of these receptors in platelet aggregation has been actively reported. Previously, hetero-oligomerization between these three receptors has been shown to occur. Here, we show that Ca²⁺ signaling evoked by the P2Y₁R agonist, 2-methylthioladenosine 5’ diphosphate (2MeSADP) was significantly inhibited by the A_2AR antagonist (ZM241385 and SCH442416) and the P2Y₁₂R antagonist (ARC69931MX) using HEK293T cells expressing the three receptors. It was confirmed that inhibition of P2Y₁R signaling by A_2AR and P2Y₁₂R antagonists was indeed mediated through A_2AR and P2Y₁₂R using 1321N1 human astrocytoma cells which do not express P2Y receptors. We expect that intermolecular signal transduction and specific conformational changes occur among components of hetero-oligomers formed by these three receptors.     

Alanine‐(87)‐threonine polymorphism impairs signaling and internalization of the human P2Y11 receptor,when co‐expressed with the P2Y1 receptor

The P2Y₁₁ nucleotide receptor detects high extracellular ATP concentrations. Mutations of the human P2RY₁₁ gene can play a role in brain autoimmune responses, and the P2Y₁₁ receptor alanine‐87‐threonine (A87T) polymorphism has been suggested to affect immune‐system functions. We investigated receptor functionality of the P2Y₁₁A87T mutant using HEK293 and 1321N1 astrocytoma cells. In HEK293 cells, the P2Y₁₁ receptor agonist 3′‐O‐(4‐benzoylbenzoyl)adenosine 5′‐triphosphate (BzATP) was completely inactive in evoking intracellular calcium release while the potency of ATP was reduced. ATP was also less potent in triggering cAMP generation. However, 1321N1 astrocytoma cells, which lack any endogenous P2Y₁ receptors, did not display a reduction. Only when 1321N1 cells were co‐transfected with P2Y₁₁A87T and P2Y₁ receptors, the calcium responses to the P2Y₁₁ receptor‐specific agonist BzATP were reduced. It is already known that P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₁ receptors interact. We thus conclude that the physiological impact of A87T mutation of the P2Y₁₁ receptor derives from detrimental effects on P2Y₁–P2Y₁₁ receptor interaction. We additionally investigated alanine‐87‐serine and alanine‐87‐tyrosine P2Y₁₁ receptor mutants. Both mutations rescue the response to BzATP in HEK293 cells, thus ruling out polarity of amino acid‐87 to be the molecular basis for altered receptor characteristics. We further found that the P2Y₁₁A87T receptor shows complete loss of nucleotide‐induced internalization in HEK293 cells. Thus, we demonstrate impaired signaling of the P2Y₁₁ A87T‐mutated receptors when co‐operating with P2Y₁ receptors.

     

Purinergic interplay between erythrocytes and platelets in diabetes-associated vascular dysfunction

Cardiovascular complications in diabetes are the leading causes for high morbidity and mortality. It has been shown that alteration of purinergic signaling contributes to diabetes-associated cardiovascular complications. Red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets play a fundamental role in regulation of oxygen transport and hemostasis, respectively. Of note, these cells undergo purinergic dysfunction in diabetes. Recent studies have established a novel function of RBCs as disease mediators for the development of endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). RBC-released ATP is defective in T2D, which has implication for induction of vascular dysfunction by dysregulating purinergic signaling. Platelets are hyperactive in diabetes. ADP-mediated P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ receptor activation contributes to platelet aggregation and targeting P2Y receptors particularly P2Y₁₂ receptor in platelets is effective for the treatment of cardiovascular events. In contrast to other P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists, platelet-targeting drug ticagrelor has potential to initiate purinergic signaling in RBCs for the beneficial cardiovascular outcomes. It is increasingly clear that altered vascular purinergic signaling mediated by various nucleotides and nucleoside contributes to diabetes-associated vascular dysfunction. However, the contribution of complex purinergic networks between RBCs and platelets to the vascular dysfunction in diabetes remains unclear. This study discusses the possible interplay of RBCs and platelets via the purinergic network for diabetes-associated vascular dysfunction.     

Muscarinic modulation of Cav2.3 (R-type) calcium channels is antagonized by RGS3 and RGS3T

Ca²⁺ influx through voltage-gated R-type (Ca_V2.3) Ca²⁺ channels is important for hormone and neurotransmitter secretion and other cellular events. Previous studies have shown that Ca_V2.3 is both inhibited and stimulated through signaling mechanisms coupled to muscarinic ACh receptors. We previously demonstrated that muscarinic stimulation of Ca_V2.3 is blocked by regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) 2. Here we investigated whether muscarinic inhibition of Ca_V2.3 is antagonized by RGS3. RGS3 is particularly interesting because it contains a lengthy (380 residue) amino-terminal domain of uncertain physiological function. Ca_V2.3, M₂ muscarinic ACh receptors (M₂R), and various deletion mutants of RGS3, including its native isoform RGS3T, were expressed in HEK293 cells, and agonist-dependent inhibition of Ca_V2.3 was quantified using whole cell patch-clamp recordings. Full-length RGS3, RGS3T, and the core domain of RGS3 were equally effective in antagonizing inhibition of Ca_V2.3 through M₂R. These results identify RGS3 and RGS3T as potential physiological regulators of R-type Ca²⁺ channels. Furthermore, they suggest that the signaling activity of RGS3 is unaffected by its extended amino-terminal domain. Confocal microscopy was used to examine the intracellular locations of four RGS3-enhanced green fluorescent protein fusion proteins. The RGS3 core domain was uniformly distributed throughout both cytoplasm and nucleus. By contrast, full-length RGS3, RGS3T, and the amino-terminal domain of RGS3 were restricted to the cytoplasm. These observations suggest that the amino terminus of RGS3 may serve to confine it to the cytoplasmic compartment where it can interact with cell surface receptors, heterotrimeric G proteins, and other signaling proteins. calcium channels; regulator of G protein signaling proteins; muscarinic acetylcholine receptors; enhanced green fluorescent protein-fusion proteins; voltage-gated R-type calcium channels     

Regulator of G Protein Signaling 2 (RGS2) and RGS4 Form Distinct G Protein-Dependent Complexes with Protease Activated-Receptor 1 (PAR1) in Live Cells

Protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that is activated by natural proteases to regulate many physiological actions. We previously reported that PAR1 couples to G_i, G_q and G₁₂ to activate linked signaling pathways. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins serve as GTPase activating proteins to inhibit GPCR/G protein signaling. Some RGS proteins interact directly with certain GPCRs to modulate their signals, though cellular mechanisms dictating selective RGS/GPCR coupling are poorly understood. Here, using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), we tested whether RGS2 and RGS4 bind to PAR1 in live COS-7 cells to regulate PAR1/Gα-mediated signaling. We report that PAR1 selectively interacts with either RGS2 or RGS4 in a G protein-dependent manner. Very little BRET activity is observed between PAR1-Venus (PAR1-Ven) and either RGS2-Luciferase (RGS2-Luc) or RGS4-Luc in the absence of Gα. However, in the presence of specific Gα subunits, BRET activity was markedly enhanced between PAR1-RGS2 by Gα_q/11, and PAR1-RGS4 by Gα_o, but not by other Gα subunits. Gα_q/11-YFP/RGS2-Luc BRET activity is promoted by PAR1 and is markedly enhanced by agonist (TFLLR) stimulation. However, PAR1-Ven/RGS-Luc BRET activity was blocked by a PAR1 mutant (R205A) that eliminates PAR1-G_q/11 coupling. The purified intracellular third loop of PAR1 binds directly to purified His-RGS2 or His-RGS4. In cells, RGS2 and RGS4 inhibited PAR1/Gα-mediated calcium and MAPK/ERK signaling, respectively, but not RhoA signaling. Our findings indicate that RGS2 and RGS4 interact directly with PAR1 in Gα-dependent manner to modulate PAR1/Gα-mediated signaling, and highlight a cellular mechanism for selective GPCR/G protein/RGS coupling.     

Macromolecular Composition Dictates Receptor and G Protein Selectivity of Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) 7 and 9-2 Protein Complexes in Living Cells

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins play essential roles in the regulation of signaling via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). With hundreds of GPCRs and dozens of G proteins, it is important to understand how RGS regulates selective GPCR-G protein signaling. In neurons of the striatum, two RGS proteins, RGS7 and RGS9-2, regulate signaling by μ-opioid receptor (MOR) and dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) and are implicated in drug addiction, movement disorders, and nociception. Both proteins form trimeric complexes with the atypical G protein β subunit Gβ5 and a membrane anchor, R7BP. In this study, we examined GTPase-accelerating protein (GAP) activity as well as Gα and GPCR selectivity of RGS7 and RGS9-2 complexes in live cells using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay that monitors dissociation of G protein subunits. We showed that RGS9-2/Gβ5 regulated both Gi and Go with a bias toward Go, but RGS7/Gβ5 could serve as a GAP only for Go. Interestingly, R7BP enhanced GAP activity of RGS7 and RGS9-2 toward Go and Gi and enabled RGS7 to regulate Gi signaling. Neither RGS7 nor RGS9-2 had any activity toward Gz, Gs, or Gq in the absence or presence of R7BP. We also observed no effect of GPCRs (MOR and D2R) on the G protein bias of R7 RGS proteins. However, the GAP activity of RGS9-2 showed a strong receptor preference for D2R over MOR. Finally, RGS7 displayed an four times greater GAP activity relative to RGS9-2. These findings illustrate the principles involved in establishing G protein and GPCR selectivity of striatal RGS proteins.     

The P2Y4 receptor forms homo-oligomeric complexes in several CNS and PNS neuronal cells

It is well established that several cell surface receptors interact with each other to form dimers and oligomers, which are essential for their activation. Since little is known about the quaternary structure of P2Y receptors, in the present work, we investigated the expression of the G-protein-coupled P2Y₄ subunit as monomeric or higher-order complex protein. We examined both endogenously expressed P2Y₄ subtype with the aid of specific anti-P2Y₄ antiserum, and heterologously transfected P2Y₄-tagged receptors with the use of antitag antibodies. In both cases, we found the P2Y₄ receptor displaying molecular masses corresponding to monomeric, dimeric and oligomeric structures. Experiments performed in the absence of reducing agents demonstrated that there is a strict correlation among the multiple protein bands and that the multimeric forms are at least partially assembled by disulphide bonds. The direct demonstration of P2Y₄ homodimerisation comes instead from co–transfection and differential co–immunoprecipitation experiments, with the use of differently tagged P2Y₄ receptors and antitag antibodies. The structural propensity of the P2Y₄ protein to form homo-oligomers may open the possibility of a novel regulatory mechanism of physiopathological functions for this and additional P2Y receptors.     

RGS proteins provide biochemical control of agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations.

Agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations have been considered a biophysical phenomenon reflecting the regulation of the IP3 receptor by [Ca2+]i. Here we show that [Ca2+]i oscillations are a biochemical phenomenon emanating from regulation of Ca2+ signaling by the regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. [Ca2+]i oscillations evoked by G protein-coupled receptors require the action of RGS proteins. Inhibition of endogenous RGS protein action disrupted agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations by a stepwise conversion to a sustained response. Based on these findings and the effect of mutant RGS proteins and anti-RGS protein antibodies on Ca2+ signaling, we propose that RGS proteins within the G protein-coupled receptor complexes provide a biochemical control of [Ca2+]i oscillations.