Twelve-week monotherapy with the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin improves glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enhances the activity of incretin hormones, improving glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes. This twelve-week randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the specific and potent oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, vildagliptin (25 mg, bid, n=70) VS. placebo (bid, n=28) in previously diet-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes. Standardized meal tests were performed at baseline and endpoint. The between-group difference in adjusted mean change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint was - 0.6 +/- 0.2 % (p=0.0012) for the whole cohort (baseline 8.0 %) and -1.2 % for subjects with baseline HbA1c 8.0 - 9.5 %. Fasting glucose and mean prandial glucose were reduced by 1.1 +/- 0.4 (p=0.0043) and 1.9 +/- 0.5 mmol/l (p <0.0001), respectively. The between-group differences in corrected insulin response at peak glucose and mean prandial C-peptide were + 0.06 +/- 0.02 (p=0.0258) and + 0.10 +/- 0.03 nmol/l (p=0.0031), respectively. Vildagliptin had no effect on fasting lipid levels or body weight. The incidence of adverse events was similar in subjects receiving placebo (71.4 %) and vildagliptin (55.7 %). CONCLUSION: monotherapy with vildagliptin is well tolerated and improves glycemic control in diet-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes. Concomitant improvements in beta-cell function were also observed. Subjects with higher baseline HbA1c levels showed greater response.     

Insulin glargine maintains equivalent glycemic control and better lipometabolic control than NPH insulin in type 1 diabetes patients who missed a meal.

Our goal was to investigate blood glucose and lipometabolism control in type 1 diabetes patients who missed breakfast and the accompanying insulin injection of NPH insulin (NPH) or insulin glargine (glargine) as part of a basal-bolus regimen. This was a multi-center, open-label, controlled study in adults (> or =18 years) with HbA (1c)< or =11.5% on insulin therapy with NPH as basal insulin. Patients were randomized to receive prandial insulin plus either bedtime glargine (n=28) or NPH (n=32). Insulin was titrated to target fasting blood glucose levels 80-130 mg/dl at 06:00-07:00. Patients had no intake of insulin or food between 22:00 and 12:00 the next day. The change in blood glucose levels (07:00-11:00) was similar (27.5 mg/dl vs. 35.4 mg/dl), but the mean blood glucose level was higher with glargine vs. NPH at 22:00 (158.2 mg/dl vs. 130.2 mg/dl). During the period without insulin or food intake, blood glucose decreased with glargine (-25.8 mg/dl) and increased with NPH (+9.1 mg/dl; p=0.0284). Nonesterified fatty acid (07:00 and 09:00-12:00) and beta-hydroxybutyrate (07:00 and 10:00-12:00) levels were lower with glargine vs. NPH (both p<0.05). For patients who miss a morning meal, glargine is associated with maintained glycemic and lipometabolic control compared with NPH insulin.     

A one-year, randomised, multicentre trial comparing insulin glargine with NPH insulin in combination with oral agents in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: The aim of the trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of the new, long-acting basal insulin, insulin glargine (LANTUS(R)), with NPH human insulin, each administered in a combination regimen with oral antidiabetic drugs in patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In a multicentre, open, randomised study, 570 patients with Type 2 diabetes, aged 34 - 80 years, were treated for 52 weeks with insulin glargine or NPH insulin given once daily at bedtime. Previous oral antidiabetic therapy was continued throughout the study. RESULTS: There was a clinically relevant decrease in glycosylated haemoglobin (GHb) values from baseline to endpoint with both drugs (insulin glargine: - 0.46 %; NPH insulin: - 0.38 %; p = 0.415); also, this difference was statistically significant in the subgroup of overweight patients with BMI > 28 kg/m 2 (insulin glargine: - 0.42 %, NPH insulin: - 0.11 %; p = 0.0237). Over the entire treatment period, NPH insulin-treated patients (41 %) and insulin glargine-treated patients (35 %) experienced a similar level of symptomatic hypoglycaemia. A statistically significant difference was observed in the number of patients treated with NPH insulin who reported at least one episode of nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with those treated with insulin glargine in the overall population and in the overweight subgroup (overall: 24 % vs. 12 %, p = 0.002; overweight: 22.2 % vs. 9.5 %, p = 0.0006), using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. These differences were most pronounced in insulin-na?ve and overweight (BMI > 28 kg/m 2) sub-groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar for the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that insulin glargine is as effective as NPH insulin in achieving glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes, and is associated with fewer episodes of symptomatic hypoglycaemia, particularly nocturnal episodes.     

Nocturnal hypoglycaemia in patients receiving conventional treatment with insulin.

The prevalence of nocturnal biochemical hypoglycaemia--that is, blood glucose concentrations below 3 mmol/l (55 mg/100 ml)--was evaluated in a random sample of 58 insulin dependent diabetics receiving twice daily insulin. Seventeen patients had at least one blood glucose value below 3 mmol/l (55 mg/100 ml) and five a value below 2 mmol/l (36 mg/100 ml) during the night. Both bedtime (2300) and fasting morning (0700) blood glucose concentrations were significantly lower in the group with nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with the group without (p less than 0.00001). If the bedtime blood glucose concentration was below 6 mmol/l (108 mg/100 ml) the risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was 80% (95% confidence limits 51-96%). If the bedtime blood glucose concentration was above 6 mmol/l the likelihood of hypoglycaemia not occurring during the night was 88% (74-96%). The mean glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) concentration in the group with nocturnal biochemical hypoglycaemia (8.2 (range 5.0-12.4)%) was significantly lower than that in the group without (9.4(7.0-14.2)%) (p less than 0.02). The prevalence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia in the patients receiving twice daily insulin (29%) was compared with that in 15 patients receiving thrice daily insulin (47%) and was not found to be significantly different. The likelihood of this risk being greater with thrice daily insulin was, however, 88%. No patient with nocturnal biochemical hypoglycaemia woke up during the night with symptomatic hypoglycaemia. Nocturnal biochemical hypoglycaemia is common during twice daily treatment with insulin, and low values of HbA1c might be associated with a higher risk of such hypoglycaemia. The blood glucose concentration at bedtime is a significant predictor of nocturnal biochemical hypoglycaemia, and HbA1c values might be of help in identifying patients at risk.     

Improved Glycemic Control with Insulin Glargine Versus Pioglitazone as Add-On Therapy to Sulfonylurea or Metformin in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo compare glycemic control with add-on insulin glargine versus pioglitazone treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.MethodsThis 48-week, multicenter, parallel-group, open-label study randomized 389 adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin A1c [A1C], 8.0% to 12.0%), despite ≥ 3 months of sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy, to receive add-on therapy with insulin glargine or pioglitazone. Outcomes included A1C change from baseline to end point (primary), percentage of patients achieving A1C levels ≤ 7.0%, and changes from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, body mass index, weight, and serum lipids. The safety analysis included incidence of adverse events and rates of hypoglycemia.ResultsAt end point, insulin glargine yielded a significantly greater reduction in A1C in comparison with pioglitazone (-2.48% versus -1.86%, respectively; 95% confidence interval, -0.93 to -0.31; P = .0001, 48-week modified intent-to-treat population). Insulin glargine also yielded significantly greater reductions in fasting plasma glucose at all time points (end point difference, -34.9 mg/ dL; 95% confidence interval, -47.6 to -22.2; P < .0001). In comparison with pioglitazone, insulin glargine resulted in a lower overall incidence of possibly related treatmentemergent adverse events (12.0% versus 20.7%) and fewer study discontinuations (2.2% versus 9.1%), but a higher rate (per patient-year) of confirmed clinically relevant hypoglycemic episodes (blood glucose < 70 mg/dL and all severe hypoglycemia) (4.97 versus 1.04; P <.0001) and severe hypoglycemia (0.07 versus 0.01; P = .0309). Weight and body mass index changes were similar between the 2 treatment groups.ConclusionThe addition of insulin glargine early in the diabetes treatment paradigm in patients for whom sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy had failed resulted in significantly greater improvements in glycemic control in comparison with the addition of pioglitazone. Although severe hypoglycemia was more frequent in patients with insulin glargine therapy, hypoglycemic events occurred in < 5% of patients in the insulin glargine treatment group. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:588-599)     

Glycemic Variation and Hypoglycemia in Patients with well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes on a Multiple Daily Insulin Injection Program with use of Glargine and Ultralente as Basal Insulin

ObjectiveTo evaluate glycemic variation and hypo-glycemia in patients with well-controlled type 1 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections during glargine and Ultralente use as basal insulin in a clinical trial.MethodsTwenty-two patients (12 men and 10 women, median age, 43 years), with a hemoglobin A1c level < 7.8%, were randomized in a crossover design to receive either insulin glargine or Ultralente insulin as basal insulin for 4 months each, with insulin aspart as prandial insulin. Continuous glucose monitoring and the Fear of Hypoglycemia questionnaire were used at baseline and at the end of each treatment period.ResultsWhereas the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions showed a correlation with the area under the curve of blood glucose < 3.89 mmol/L per day, the number of periods during the day with hypoglycemia was significantly correlated with the M value. Measures of glycemic variation did not differ significantly between glargine and Ultralente treatment. With use of glargine therapy, the SD of blood glucose levels showed a tendency to be lower and the SD of nocturnal blood glucose concentrations was significantly lower. Glucose concentrations were significantly lower during the 1 hour before and the 3 hours after lunch with use of Ultralente. The “Worry” scale on the Fear of Hypoglycemia questionnaire was less during Ultralente therapy and correlated with the number of times blood glucose concentrations were < 3.89 mmol/L daily.ConclusionMeasures of glycemic variability and hypoglycemia need to be studied more in clinical trials of glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes. Glycemic variability is less, particularly at night, with glargine as basal insulin. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:244-250)     

Metabolic evaluation of urolithiasis patients from eastern Croatia

Metabolic parameters were determined in fasting blood serum, fasting first morning urine, and 24-hour urine of male patients with recurrent calcium oxalate stones (N = 26, age 39.1 +/- 6.2 years) as well as in male healthy controls (N = 18, age 35.0 +/- 7.1 years), recruited from the eastern part of Croatia. The 24-hour urinary calcium excretion was significantly higher (p < 0.01) for patients (5.6 +/- 2.5 mmol) than for controls (3.7 +/- 1.9 mmol), but potassium excretion was higher (p < 0.01) for controls (74.5 +/- 33.8 mmol) than for patients (49.2 +/- 15.7 mmol). The mean ionic activity product of calcium and oxalate ions, IAP(CaOx), calculated from the fasting first morning urine parameters, was 25% higher for patients than for controls, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Very strong correlation (r = 0.97) was obtained between IAP(CaOx) values and calculated Ogawa indices that were recommended for estimating the potential risk for calcium oxalate stone formation.     

Improved meal-related insulin processing contributes to the enhancement of B-cell function by the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of insulin processing to the improved meal-related B-cell function previously shown with the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin. Fifty-five patients with type 2 diabetes (56.5+/-1.5 years; BMI=29.6+/-0.5 kg/m(2); FPG=9.9+/-0.2 mmol/l; HbA1c=7.7+/-0.1 %) were studied: 29 patients were treated with vildagliptin and 26 patients with placebo, both added to an ongoing metformin regimen (1.5-3.0 g/day). A standardized breakfast was given at baseline and after 52 weeks of treatment, and proinsulin related to insulin secretion was measured with C-peptide in the fasting and postprandial (over 4 h post-meal) states to evaluate B-cell function. The between-treatment difference (vildagliptin-placebo) in mean change from baseline in fasting proinsulin to C-peptide ratio (fastP/C) was -0.007+/-0.009 (p=0.052). Following the standard breakfast, 52 weeks of treatment with vildagliptin significantly decreased the dynamic proinsulin to C-peptide ratio (dynP/C) relative to placebo by 0.010+/-0.008 (p=0.037). Importantly, when the P/C was expressed in relation to the glucose stimulus (i.e., the fasting glucose and glucose AUC(0-240 min), respectively), the P/C relative to glucose was significantly reduced with vildagliptin vs. placebo, both in the fasting state (p=0.023) and postprandially (p=0.004). In conclusion, a more efficient B-cell insulin processing provides further evidence that vildagliptin treatment ameliorates abnormal B-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

甘精胰岛素联合不同降糖药稳定2 型糖尿病血糖水平的效果

目的:评价甘精胰岛素联合沙格列汀或格列美脲稳定2型糖尿病血糖水平的作用效果。方法:将我院2收治的228例2型糖尿病患者按照随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组114人。研究组给予沙格列汀联合甘精胰岛素进行治疗,对照组给予格列美脲联合甘精胰岛素进行治疗。全部病例在治疗前4 d及治疗满16周时应用动态血糖监测仪实施72 h动态血糖监测。对比两组治疗前后血糖水平相关指标及血糖水平浮动相关指标的变化。结果:研究组治疗后体质指数显著低于对照组(P0.05)。两组治疗后空腹血糖均比本组治疗前显著下降(P0.05)。两组治疗后糖化血红蛋白均比本组治疗前显著下降(P0.05)。两组治疗后胰岛素用量无显著差异。两组平均血糖水平治疗前后无显著差异(P0.05)。研究组治疗后血糖标准差、日内血糖平均波动幅度、日内血糖波动次数、日间血糖平均绝对差改善幅度显著优于对照组。两组高血糖治疗后均比治疗前显著改善,改善幅度无显著差异(P0.05)。两组低血糖曲线下面积治疗前后无显著差异(P0.05)。结论:甘精胰岛素并用沙格列汀更能在显著控制2型糖尿病患者血糖的同时,还可使其血糖水平保持持久稳定,且不增加其低血糖的发生风险。     

Pharmacological PPARgamma stimulation in contrast to beta cell stimulation results in an improvement in adiponectin and proinsulin intact levels and reduces intima media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The role of intact proinsulin and adiponectin in endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance has been receiving increasing attention. This study investigates the effect of PPARgamma stimulation or beta-cell stimulation on metabolic and vascular parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. In our study, 173 type 2 diabetic patients were recruited and randomly assigned to pioglitazone 45 mg or glimepiride 1 - 6 mg treatment. Intima media thickness of the carotid artery, glycemic control, insulin resistance, adiponectin and intact proinsulin levels were assessed at baseline and after six months of treatment. Despite similar improvements in metabolic control (HbA (1c) after 24 weeks: - 0.8 +/- 0.9% [pioglitazone] vs. - 0.6 +/- 0.8% [glimepiride]; mean +/- SD; p < 0.0001, respectively), improvements in intima media thickness (- 0.033 +/- 0.052 mm; p < 0.0001), proinsulin intact (- 5.92 +/- 10.04 pmol/l; p < 0.0001), adiponectin (10.9 +/- 6.3 microg/ml; p < 0.0001) and HOMA score (- 2.21 +/- 3.40; p < 0.0001) were observed by pioglitazone but not glimepiride treatment. Reduction in intima media thickness was correlated with improved insulin sensitivity (r = 0.29; p = 0.0003), and proinsulin intact levels (r = 0.22; p = 0.006), while an inverse correlation was found with adiponectin levels (r = - 0.37; p < 0.0001). Measurement of adiponectin and intact proinsulin enables characterization of the metabolic situation and an estimation of atherosclerotic risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Intermediate acting insulin given at bedtime: effect on blood glucose concentrations before and after breakfast.

Six C-peptide deficient diabetics receiving twice daily mixtures of short and intermediate acting insulins were selected for study because of persistently raised blood glucose concentrations before and after breakfast. They were investigated to assess the effect of moving their evening injection of intermediate acting insulin to bedtime. The patients'' usual twice daily insulin treatment was optimised and compared with the bedtime regimen during inpatient metabolic studies and an outpatient crossover study. With the conventional injection regimen blood glucose concentration rose sharply from 0500 to reach a fasting mean value of 10 +/- SE 1 . 6 mmol/l (180 +/- 29 mg/100 ml) and 16 . 8 +/- 2 . 2 mmol/l (303 +/- 40 mg/100 ml) after breakfast. By contrast, when the evening dose of intermediate acting insulin was delayed until bedtime the nocturnal rise in blood glucose concentration started later and was significantly lower both fasting (7 . 5 +/- 1 . 1 mmol/l (135 +/- 20 mg/100 ml); p less than 0 . 02) and after breakfast (13 . 2 +/- 1 . 4 mmol/l(238 +/- 25 mg/100 ml); p less than 0 . 02). Fasting blood concentrations of ketone bodies (3-hydroxybutyrate) were also significantly decreased. Plasma free insulin concentrations showed the predicted changes in five of the six patients. Blood glucose profiles collected over four months during the outpatient study confirmed the beneficial effect of giving intermediate acting insulin at bedtime.     

Vildagliptin in drug-na?ve patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study.

This 24-week double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was performed in 632 drug-na?ve patients with type 2 diabetes to assess efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin (50 mg qd, 50 mg bid, or 100 mg qd). HbA1c decreased modestly in patients receiving placebo (Delta=-0.3+/-0.1%) and to a significantly greater extent in patients receiving vildagliptin 50 mg qd (Delta=-0.8+/-0 .1%), 50 mg bid (Delta=-0.8+/-0.1%), or 100 mg qd (Delta=-0.9+/-0.1%, p<0.01 for all groups VS. placebo) from an average baseline of 8.4%. In patients diagnosed >or=3 months before enrollment, HbA1c increased with placebo (Delta=+0.2+/-0.2%) and between-treatment differences (vildagliptin-placebo) were -0.8+/-0.2% (p<0.001), -0.7+/-0.2% (p=0.003), and -0.9+/-0.2% (p<0.001) with vildagliptin 50 mg qd, 50 mg bid, and 100 mg qd, respectively. There was no apparent dose-response in the overall population; however, in patients with high baseline HbA1c, there were greater reductions with either 100 mg dose regimen (Delta=-1.3+/-0.2% and -1.4+/-0.2%) compared to 50 mg qd (Delta=-0.8+/-0.1%). Body weight decreased modestly in all groups (by 0.3 to 1.8 kg). The incidence of adverse events was similar across all groups and 相似文献   

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec 200 U/mL and Insulin Degludec 100 U/mL in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (Begin: Compare)

ObjectiveThe purpose of the present study was to provide clinical data on the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec (IDeg) 200 U/mL compared with IDeg 100 U/mL in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) currently treated with basal insulin in combination with oral antidiabetic drugs.MethodsIn this 22-week, treat-to-target trial, eligible adult patients with T2DM were randomized 1:1 to IDeg 200 or IDeg 100 U/mL once daily (OD) (n = 186 and 187, respectively). The starting insulin dose was based on a 1:1 transfer of the total prerandomization basal insulin dose. The primary endpoint was change (%) from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin A1C (A1C) after 22 weeks of treatment.ResultsA total of 373 subjects (mean age 59.8 years, A1C 8.2%, fasting plasma glucose 149.6 mg/dL [8.3 mmol/L], body mass index 33.3 kg/m²) were randomized. A1C reduction with IDeg 200 U/mL was noninferior to that of IDeg 100 U/mL (IDeg 200 U/mL – IDeg 100 U/mL estimated treatment difference: -0.11%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.28 to 0.05). Rates of overall confirmed hypoglycemia were low and similar between both formulations (5.17 and 5.66 events/patient-year of exposure [PYE] for IDeg 200 and 100 U/mL, respectively). Similarly, the rates of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia were low (1.27 and 1.70 events/PYE for 200 and 100 U/mL). In general, both IDeg formulations were well tolerated (respective rates of adverse events: 4.16 and 3.00 events/PYE for 200 and 100 U/mL).ConclusionThe 200 and 100 U/mL formulations of IDeg provide comparable and effective levels of glycemic control with similar, low rates of overall confirmed and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia. (Endocr Pract. 2014; 20:785-791)     

Patient-Led Versus Physician-Led Titration of Insulin Glargine in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Multinational Atlas Study

ObjectiveSelf-adjustment of insulin dose is commonly practiced in Western patients with type 2 diabetes but is usually not performed in Asian patients. This multinational, 24-week, randomized study compared patient-led with physician-led titration of once-daily insulin glargine in Asian patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were on 2 oral glucose-lowering agents.MethodsPatient-led (n = 275) or physician-led (n = 277) subjects followed the same dose-titration algorithm guided by self-monitored fasting blood glucose (FBG; target, 110 mg/dL [6.1 mmol/L]). The primary endpoint was change in mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) at week 24 in the patient-led versus physician-led titration groups.ResultsPatient-led titration resulted in a significantly higher drop in HbA_1c value at 24 weeks when compared with physician-led titration (− 1.40% vs. − 1.25%; mean difference, − 0.15; 95% confidence interval, − 0.29 to 0.00; P = .043). Mean decrease in FBG was greatest in the patient-led group (− 2.85 mmol/L vs. − 2.48 mmol/L; P = .001). The improvements in HbA_1c and FBG were consistent across countries, with similar improvements in treatment satisfaction in both groups. Mean daily insulin dose was higher in the patient-led group (28.9 units vs. 22.2 units; P < .001). Target HbA_1c of < 7.0% without severe hypoglycemia was achieved in 40.0% and 32.9% in the patient-led and physician-led groups, respectively (P = .086). Severe hypoglycemia was not different in the 2 groups (0.7%), with an increase in nocturnal and symptomatic hypoglycemia in the patient-led arm.ConclusionPatient-led insulin glargine titration achieved near-target blood glucose levels in Asian patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were on 2 oral glucose-lowering drugs, demonstrating that Asian patients can self-uptitrate insulin dose effectively when guided. (Endocr Pract. 2015;21:143-157)     

Patients Achieving Good Glycemic Control (HBA1c <7%) Experience A Lower Rate of Hypoglycemia With Insulin Degludec Than with Insulin Glargine: A Meta-Analysis of Phase 3A Trials

Objective: Meta-analysis to compare hypoglycemia rates of basal insulin degludec (IDeg) with insulin glargine (IGlar) in patients with diabetes achieving good glycemic control (hemoglobin A_1c [HbA_1c] <7% at end of trial).Methods: In a preplanned meta-analysis, patient data from 7 randomized, treat-to-target, 26- or 52-week trials in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who administered IDeg (n = 2,899) or IGlar (n = 1,431) once daily were analyzed. Using a negative binomial regression model, this meta-analysis compared hypoglycemia rates in patients achieving HbA_1c <7% at end of trial with IDeg (n = 1,347) and IGlar (n = 697).Results: In all trials, IDeg was noninferior to IGlar in HbA_1c reduction from baseline. At end of trial, 2,044 patients (T2DM, n = 1,661; T1DM, n = 383) achieved HbA_1c <7%. The overall confirmed hypoglycemia rate, defined as plasma glucose <56 mg/dL or severe hypoglycemia if requiring assistance, was significantly lower with IDeg versus IGlar (estimated rate ratio [ERR] IDeg:IGlar, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 0.98). The nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia rate, defined as occurring between midnight and 6:00 am, was significantly lower with IDeg (ERR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.77). In the maintenance period (16 weeks onward when average insulin dose and glycemic levels stabilized), the overall confirmed hypoglycemia rate was significantly lower (ERR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.92) and the nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia rate was significantly lower (ERR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.72) with IDeg versus IGlar.Conclusion: Patients with T1DM and T2DM achieved HbA_1c <7% with significantly lower rates of overall and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia with IDeg versus IGlar. The lower hypoglycemia rate with IDeg was more pronounced in the maintenance period.Abbreviations: ERR = estimated rate ratio; HbA_1c = hemoglobin A_1c; IDeg = insulin degludec; IGlar = insulin glargine; NPH = Neutral Protamine Hagedorn; PG = plasma glucose; T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

Diurnal Variation in Insulin-stimulated Systemic Glucose and Amino Acid Utilization in Pigs Fed with Identical Meals at 12-Hour Intervals.

The diurnal variation in insulin-stimulated systemic glucose and amino acid utilization was investigated in eleven pigs of approximately 40 kg. Pigs were fed isoenergetic/isoproteinic diets (366 kJ/kg BW (0.75) per meal) in two daily rations (06:00 and 18:00 h). After a 3-week habituation period, hyperinsulinemic euglycemic euaminoacidemic clamp studies (by intra-portal insulin, glucose and amino acids infusion and arterial blood sampling) were performed starting at 06:00 or 18:00 h (while skipping the meal), using a cross-over within-animal design. Basal (preclamp) plasma concentrations of insulin, glucose, lactate, individual amino acids and urea were similar in the morning compared to the evening. Insulin-stimulated ( approximately 4-fold increase over basal) systemic glucose utilization was similar (17.6+/-1.4 and 18.9+/-1.8 mg.kg (-1).min (-1)) but amino acid utilization was 19% greater in the morning VS. the evening (2.37+/-0.21 VS. 1.99+/-0.15 mg.kg (-1).min (-1), p<0.05), respectively. Insulin-stimulated plasma lactate concentrations remained constant in the morning (0.77+/-0.06 to 0.71+/-0.04 mmol.l (-1)) but declined in the evening (0.89+/-0.09 to 0.65+/-0.06 mmol.l (-1), p<0.05). By contrast, insulin-stimulated plasma urea concentrations declined in the morning (2.48+/-0.11 to 2.03+/-0.10 mmol.l (-1), p<0.005) but remained constant in the evening (2.18+/-0.14 to 2.12+/-0.12 mmol.l (-1)). In conclusion, pigs fed identical meals at 12-hour intervals follow a clear diurnal biorhythm in protein anabolism, with greater insulin-stimulated systemic amino acid utilization and lower plasma urea response in the morning compared to the evening.     

Pioneer study: PPARgamma activation results in overall improvement of clinical and metabolic markers associated with insulin resistance independent of long-term glucose control.

New scores and biochemical markers have recently been published for diagnosis of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction (such as intact proinsulin, adiponectin, IRISII-score). One goal of this 6-month prospective controlled study was to evaluate the impact of pioglitazone (45 mg) vs. glimepiride (1-6 mg, in the intend to optimize therapy) on these markers. Observation parameters were: IRIS-II score, HOMA-score, ATP III score, HbA (1c), fasting glucose, lipids, intact proinsulin, adiponectin, and adverse events. The study was completed by 173 patients (66 female, 107 male, age +/- STD: 63 +/- 8 years, disease duration: 7.2 +/- 7.2 years, HbA (1c): 7.53 +/- 0.85 %, pioglitazone arm: 89 patients). The groups were not different for any of the observation parameters at baseline, and a similar reduction in HbA (1c) was seen in both groups (p < 0.001). In the pioglitazone group, reductions were observed for the IRIS-II and HOMA scores (p < 0.001 vs. glimepiride at endpoint) fasting glucose (p < 0.001), insulin (p < 0.001), LDL/HDL ratio (p < 0.001), hsCRP (p < 0.05), intact proinsulin (p < 0.001), and an increase was seen in HDL (p < 0.001), adiponectin (p < 0.001) and BMI (p < 0.001). In conclusion, treatment with pioglitazone resulted in an improvement of markers for insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction, independent from blood glucose control. Adiponectin, intact proinsulin, and the IRIS-II score may be suitable parameters for monitoring of these additional beneficial therapeutic effects.     

Reduced Hypoglycemia and Comparable Efficacy with Insulin Glargine 300 U/ML Versus Insulin Glargine 100 U/ML in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Achieving Different Levels of Prebreakfast Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) and insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who reached prebreakfast self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) levels <100 and <130 mg/dL.Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of insulin-naïve (EDITION 3, NCT01676220) and experienced (EDITION 2, NCT01499095) patients with uncontrolled T2D, randomized to 6 months of Gla-300 versus Gla-100 treatment. Endpoints included glycated hemoglobin A1c change, hypoglycemia incidence, and event rates. Separate comparisons were done for patients achieving prebreak-fast fasting glucose of <100 versus ≥100 mg/dL and <130 versus ≥130 mg/dL.Results: Efficacy did not differ significantly between treatments in either study. Overall, basal insulin doses were ~10% higher with Gla-300 versus Gla-100. EDITION 2: overall and documented (≤70 mg/dL) hypoglycemia rates were significantly lower with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 in all SMPG groups except <100 mg/dL; nocturnal hypoglycemia rates were significantly lower with Gla-300 in all SMPG groups. EDITION 3: overall hypoglycemia rates were significantly lower with Gla-300 in patients with SMPG ≥100 mg/dL and those with SMPG <130 mg/dL; documented hypoglycemia rates were significantly lower in all SMPG groups except ≥130 mg/dL. Nocturnal and nocturnal documented hypoglycemia rates did not differ by treatment group. Hypoglycemia incidence did not differ by treatment in any SMPG group.Conclusion: In patients with T2D initiating basal insulin or previously treated for ≥6 months with basal insulin, Gla-300 provides similar efficacy to Gla-100 and reduces risk of hypoglycemia for many patients, despite a ~10% higher insulin dose.Abbreviations: A1C = glycated hemoglobin A1c; ADA = American Diabetes Association; Gla-100 = insulin glargine 100 U/mL; Gla-300 = insulin glargine 100 U/mL; OAD = oral antidiabetes drug; SMPG = self-monitored plasma glucose; T2D = type 2 diabetes     

Effect of dihydroxyacetone and pyruvate on plasma glucose concentration and turnover in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Consumption of dihydroxyacetone and pyruvate (DHP) increases muscle extraction of glucose in normal men. To test the hypothesis that these three-carbon compounds would improve glycemic control in diabetes, we evaluated the effect of DHP on plasma glucose concentration, turnover, recycling, and tolerance in 7 women with noninsulin-dependent diabetes. The subjects consumed a 1,500-calorie diet (55% carbohydrate, 30% fat, 15% protein), randomly containing 13% of the calories as DHP (1/1) or Polycose (placebo; PL), as a drink three times daily for 7 days. On the 8th day, primed continuous infusions of [6-3H]-glucose and [U-14C]-glucose were begun at 05.00 h, and at 09.00 h a 3-hour glucose tolerance test (75 g glucola) was performed. Two weeks later the subjects repeated the study with the other diet. The fasting plasma glucose level decreased by 14% with DHP (DHP = 8.0 +/- 0.9 mmol/l; PL = 9.3 +/- 1.0 mmol/l, p less than 0.05) which accounted for lower postoral glucose glycemia (DHP = 13.1 +/- 0.8 mmol/l, PL = 14.7 +/- 0.8 mmol/l, p less than 0.05). [6-3H]-glucose turnover (DHP = 1.50 +/- 0.19 mg.kg-1.min-1, PL = 1.77 +/- 0.21 mg.kg-1.min-1, p less than 0.05) and glucose recycling, the difference in [6-3H]-glucose and [U-14C]-glucose turnover rates, decreased with DHP (DHP = 0.25 +/- 0.07 mg.kg-1.min-1, PL = 0.54 +/- 0.10 mg.kg-1.min-1, p less than 0.05). Fasting and postoral glucose, plasma insulin, glucagon, and C peptide levels were unaffected by DHP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Optimized Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimens in Type 1 Diabetes: Insulin Glulisine Versus Regular Human Insulin in Combination with Basal Insulin Glargine

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine (GLU), a new rapid-acting insulin analogue, injected 0 to 15 minutes before or immediately after meals, with regular human insulin (RHI), injected 30 to 45 minutes before meals.MethodsPatients with type 1 diabetes (N = 860) received once-daily insulin glargine and subcutaneous injections of either GLU (premeal or postmeal) or premeal RHI in this open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter, parallel-group, 12-week study.ResultsBaseline to endpoint changes in mean glycated hemoglobin (as A1c equivalents) (A1c) occurred in the premeal GLU, postmeal GLU, and premeal RHI groups (-0.26%, -0.11%, and -0.13%, respectively). The reduction in A1c was greater for the premeal GLU group in comparison with the RHI group (P = 0.02) and the post-meal GLU group (P = 0.006); no significant between-treatment difference was found for postmeal GLU versus RHI. Overall, blood glucose profiles were similar in all 3 treatment groups but were significantly lower for premeal GLU 2-hour postbreakfast measurements (premeal versus postmeal GLU, P = 0.0017; premeal GLU versus RHI, P = 0.0001) and 2-hour postdinner measurements (premeal GLU versus RHI, P = 0.0001; premeal versus postmeal GLU, P = 0.0137). Severe hypoglycemic episodes were comparable for premeal GLU, postmeal GLU, and pre-meal RHI groups (8.4%, 8.4%, and 10.1%, respectively). Body weight increased (+ 0.3 kg) in the RHI and premeal GLU groups; however, weight decreased in the postmeal GLU group (-0.3 kg; between-treatment difference, P = 0.03).ConclusionBetter A1c reductions were obtained with premeal GLU, but postmeal administration of GLU was as safe and effective as premeal GLU or RHI in combination with insulin glargine and was not associated with weight gain. (Endocr Pract. 2005;11:11-17)