Model of the structure of the eukaryotic ribosomal translation termination complex

Models of the atomic structure of the eukaryotic translation termination complex containing mRNA, P-site tRNA^Phe, human class 1 release factor eRF1, and 80S ribosome, were constructed by computational modeling. The modeling was based on the assumed structural-functional similarity between the tRNA and eFR1 molecules in the ribosomal A site. The known atomic structure of the 70S ribosome complexed with mRNA as well as the P-and A-site tRNAs^Phe was used as a structural template for the modeling. The eRF1 molecule bound in the A site undergoes substantial conformational changes so that the mutual configuration of the N and M domains matches the overall tRNA shape. Two models of eRF1 binding to mRNA at the A site in the presence of P-site tRNA^Phe were generated. A characteristic of these models is complementary interactions between the mRNA stop codon and the grooves at different sides of the surface of the eRF1 fragment, containing helix α2, NIKS loop, and helix α3 of the N domain. In model 1, the nucleotides of the mRNA stop codon at the A site are approximately equidistant (～15 Å) from the N (motifs NIKS and YxCxxxF) and C domains. In model 2, the stop codon is close to the N-domain motifs NIKS and YxCxxxF. Both models fit genetic and biochemical experimental data. The choice of a particular model requires additional studies.     

Three distinct peptides from the N domain of translation termination factor eRF1 surround stop codon in the ribosome

To study positioning of the polypeptide release factor eRF1 toward a stop signal in the ribosomal decoding site, we applied photoactivatable mRNA analogs, derivatives of oligoribonucleotides. The human eRF1 peptides cross-linked to these short mRNAs were identified. Cross-linkers on the guanines at the second, third, and fourth stop signal positions modified fragment 31–33, and to lesser extent amino acids within region 121–131 (the “YxCxxxF loop”) in the N domain. Hence, both regions are involved in the recognition of the purines. A cross-linker at the first uridine of the stop codon modifies Val66 near the NIKS loop (positions 61–64), and this region is important for recognition of the first uridine of stop codons. Since the N domain distinct regions of eRF1 are involved in a stop-codon decoding, the eRF1 decoding site is discontinuous and is not of “protein anticodon” type. By molecular modeling, the eRF1 molecule can be fitted to the A site proximal to the P-site-bound tRNA and to a stop codon in mRNA via a large conformational change to one of its three domains. In the simulated eRF1 conformation, the YxCxxxF motif and positions 31–33 are very close to a stop codon, which becomes also proximal to several parts of the C domain. Thus, in the A-site-bound state, the eRF1 conformation significantly differs from those in crystals and solution. The model suggested for eRF1 conformation in the ribosomal A site and cross-linking data are compatible.     

Molecular Morphology of Eukaryotic Class-1 Translation Termination Factor eRF1 in Solution

The integral structural parameters and the shape of the molecule of human translation termination factor eRF1 were determined from the small-angle X-ray scattering in solution. The molecular shapes were found by bead modeling with nonlinear minimization of the root-mean-square deviation of the calculated from the experimental scattering curve. Comparisons of the small-angle scattering curves computed for atomic-resolution structures of eRF1 with the experimental data on scattering from solution testified that the crystal and the solution conformations are close. In the ribosome, the distance between the eRF1 motifs GGQ and NIKS must be shorter than in crystal or solution (75 versus 100–107 Å). Therefore, like its bacterial counterpart RF2, the eukaryotic eRF1 must change its conformation as it binds to the ribosome. The conformational mobility of eukaryotic and prokaryotic class-1 release factors is another feature making them functionally akin to tRNA.     

Molecular modeling of positioning of human release factor eRF1 relative to mRNA stop-codon explains a proximity of the eRF1 C-domain to stop-codon in ribosomal complex

A properties of atomic models of structure of eukaryotic triple complex eRF1 . mRNA . tRNAPhe containing human class-1 polypeptide release factor eRF1 at the A-site of human 80S ribosome, mRNA and P-site tRNAPhe, obtained before, are considered. The stricture of the complex is described using high resolution NMR structure of eRF1 M-domain. The structural properties of distribution of chemical cross-links are investigated, which allows us to choose correct model of positioning of the eRF1 molecule in ribosome A-site relative to stop codon of mRNA. A distributions of crosslinks between photoactivatable perfluoroaryl azide group of modified nucleotides of mRNA analogues and eRF1 molecule are modeled via molecular dynamics method. Twelve different mRNA analogues with modified nucleotides of stop signal in positions +4 to +9 with respect to the first nucleotide of the P-site codon are modeled. It was shown that only one of the two models of complex eRFI . mRNA . tRNA gives cross-link distribution in a good agreement with experimental data. A new features of the final structure of triple complex eRF1 . mRNA . tRNA is spatial proximity of stop-codon nucleotides to the C-domain of the eRF1, which explains previously obtained cross-link experimental data.     

The C domain of translation termination factor eRF1 is close to the stop codon in the A site of the 80S ribosome

The arrangement of the stop codon and its 3′-flanking codon relative to the components of translation termination complexes of human 80S ribosomes was studied using mRNA analogs containing the stop signal UPuPuPu (Pu is A or G) and the photoreactive perfluoroarylazido group, which was linked to a stop-signal or 3′-flanking nucleotide (positions from +4 to +9 relative to the first nucleotide of the P-site codon). Upon mild UV irradiation, the analogs crosslinked to components of the model complexes, mimicking the state of the 80S ribosome at translation termination. Termination factors eRF1 and eRF3 did not change the relative arrangement of the stop signal and 18S rRNA. Crosslinking to eRF1 was observed for modified nucleotides in positions +5 to +9 (that for stop-codon nucleotide +4 was detected earlier). The eRF1 fragments crosslinked to the mRNA analogs were identified. Fragment 52–195, including the N domain and part of the M domain, crosslinked to the analogs carrying the reactive group at A or G in positions +5 to +9 or at the terminal phosphate of nucleotide +7. The site crosslinking to mRNA analogs containing modified G in positions +5 to +7 was assigned to eRF1 fragment 82–166 (beyond the NIKS motif). All but one analog (that with modified G in position +4) crosslinked to the C domain of eRF1 (fragment 330–422). The efficiency of crosslinking to the C domain was higher than to the N domain in most cases. It was assumed that the C domain of eRF1 bound in the A site is close to nucleotides +5 to +9, especially +7 and +8, and that eRF1 undergoes substantial conformational changes when binding to the ribosome.     

Identification of eRF1 residues that play critical and complementary roles in stop codon recognition

The initiation and elongation stages of translation are directed by codon-anticodon interactions. In contrast, a release factor protein mediates stop codon recognition prior to polypeptide chain release. Previous studies have identified specific regions of eukaryotic release factor one (eRF1) that are important for decoding each stop codon. The cavity model for eukaryotic stop codon recognition suggests that three binding pockets/cavities located on the surface of eRF1's domain one are key elements in stop codon recognition. Thus, the model predicts that amino acid changes in or near these cavities should influence termination in a stop codon-dependent manner. Previous studies have suggested that the TASNIKS and YCF motifs within eRF1 domain one play important roles in stop codon recognition. These motifs are highly conserved in standard code organisms that use UAA, UAG, and UGA as stop codons, but are more divergent in variant code organisms that have reassigned a subset of stop codons to sense codons. In the current study, we separately introduced TASNIKS and YCF motifs from six variant code organisms into eRF1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to determine their effect on stop codon recognition in vivo. We also examined the consequences of additional changes at residues located between the TASNIKS and YCF motifs. Overall, our results indicate that changes near cavities two and three frequently mediated significant effects on stop codon selectivity. In particular, changes in the YCF motif, rather than the TASNIKS motif, correlated most consistently with variant code stop codon selectivity.     

Stop codons and UGG promote efficient binding of the polypeptide release factor eRF1 to the ribosomal A site

To investigate the codon dependence of human eRF1 binding to the mRNA-ribosome complex, we examined the formation of photocrosslinks between ribosomal components and mRNAs bearing a photoactivable 4-thiouridine probe in the first position of the codon located in the A site. Addition of eRF1 to the phased mRNA-ribosome complexes triggers a codon-dependent quenching of crosslink formation. The concentration of eRF1 triggering half quenching ranges from low for the three stop codons, to intermediate for s4UGG and high for other near-cognate triplets. A theoretical analysis of the photochemical processes occurring in a two-state bimolecular model raises a number of stringent conditions, fulfilled by the system studied here, and shows that in any case sound KD values can be extracted if the ratio mT/KD<1 (mT is total concentration of mRNA added). Considering the KD values obtained for the stop, s4UGG and sense codons (approximately 0.06 microM, 0.45 microM and 2.3 microM, respectively) and our previous finding that only the stop and s4UGG codons are able to promote formation of an eRF1-mRNA crosslink, implying a role for the NIKS loop at the tip of the N domain, we propose a two-step model for eRF1 binding to the A site: a codon-independent bimolecular step is followed by an isomerisation step observed solely with stop and s4UGG codons. Full recognition of the stop codons by the N domain of eRF1 triggers a rearrangement of bound eRF1 from an open to a closed conformation, allowing the universally conserved GGQ loop at the tip of the M domain to come into close proximity of the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosome. UGG is expected to behave as a cryptic stop codon, which, owing to imperfect eRF1-codon recognition, does not allow full reorientation of the M domain of eRF1. As far as the physical steps of eRF1 binding to the ribosome are considered, they appear to closely mimic the behaviour of the tRNA/EF-Tu/GTP complex, but clearly eRF1 is endowed with a greater conformational flexibility than tRNA.     

Convergence and constraint in eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) domain 1: the evolution of stop codon specificity

Class 1 release factor in eukaryotes (eRF1) recognizes stop codons and promotes peptide release from the ribosome. The ‘molecular mimicry’ hypothesis suggests that domain 1 of eRF1 is analogous to the tRNA anticodon stem–loop. Recent studies strongly support this hypothesis and several models for specific interactions between stop codons and residues in domain 1 have been proposed. In this study we have sequenced and identified novel eRF1 sequences across a wide diversity of eukaryotes and re-evaluated the codon-binding site by bioinformatic analyses of a large eRF1 dataset. Analyses of the eRF1 structure combined with estimates of evolutionary rates at amino acid sites allow us to define the residues that are under structural (i.e. those involved in intramolecular interactions) versus non-structural selective constraints. Furthermore, we have re-assessed convergent substitutions in the ciliate variant code eRF1s using maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic approaches. Our results favor the model proposed by Bertram et al. that stop codons bind to three ‘cavities’ on the protein surface, although we suggest that the stop codon may bind in the opposite orientation to the original model. We assess the feasibility of this alternative binding orientation with a triplet stop codon and the eRF1 domain 1 structures using molecular modeling techniques.     

Cloning, characterization and expression of the polypeptide release factor gene, eRF1, of Blepharisma japonicum

The polypeptide release factor gene, eRF1, of Blepharisma japonicum (Bj-eRF1) was cloned and sequenced. Its coding region was 1314 base pairs and encodes a protein of 437 amino acids. The cloned gene was expressed in Escherichia coli and the recombinant Bj-eRF1 polypeptide was purified by Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose and Superose12 chromatography. Pull-down analysis showed that the recombinant Bj-eRF1 interacts with the heterologously-expressed release factor, eRF3C, of Euplotes octocarinatus.     

A New Method to Measure the Functional Activity of Class-1 Translation Termination Factor eRF1

Termination of protein synthesis (hydrolysis of the last peptidyl-tRNA on the ribosome) takes place when the ribosomal A site is occupied simultaneously by one of the three stop codons and by a class-1 translation termination factor. The existing procedures to measure the functional activity of this factor both in vitro and in vivo have serious drawbacks, the main of which are artificial conditions for in vitro assays, far from those in the cell, and indirect evaluation of activity in in vivo systems. A simple reliable and sensitive system to measure the functional activity of class-1 translation termination factors could considerably expedite the study of the terminal steps of protein synthesis, at present remaining poorly known, especially in eukaryotes. We suggest a novel system to test the functional activity in vitro using native functionally active mRNA, rather than tri-, tetra-, or oligonucleotides as before. This mRNA is specially designed to contain one of the three terminating (stop) codons within the coding nucleotide sequence. Plasmids have been generated that carry the genes of suppressor tRNAs each of which is specific toward one of the three stop codons. They were shown to support normal synthesis of a reporter protein, luciferase, by reading through the stop codon within the coding mRNA sequence. We have demonstrated that human class-1 translation termination factor eRF1 is able to compete with suppressor tRNA for a stop codon and to completely prevent its suppressive effect at a sufficient concentration. Forms of eRF1 with point mutations in functionally essential regions have lower competitive ability, demonstrating the sensitivity of the method to the eRF1 structure. The enzymatic reaction catalyzed by the full-size reporter protein is accompanied by emission of light quanta. Therefore, competition between suppressor tRNA and eRF1 can be measured using a luminometer, and this allows precise kinetic measurements in a continuous automatic mode.     

Interaction between the poly(A)-binding protein Pab1 and the eukaryotic release factor eRF3 regulates translation termination but not mRNA decay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Eukaryotic release factor 3 (eRF3) is implicated in translation termination and also interacts with the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP, Pab1 in yeast), a major player in mRNA metabolism. Despite conservation of this interaction, its precise function remains elusive. First, we showed experimentally that yeast eRF3 does not contain any obvious consensus PAM2 (PABP-interacting motif 2). Thus, in yeast this association is different from the well described interaction between the metazoan factors. To gain insight into the exact function of this interaction, we then analyzed the phenotypes resulting from deleting the respective binding domains. Deletion of the Pab1 interaction domain on eRF3 did not affect general mRNA stability or nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway and induced a decrease in translational readthrough. Furthermore, combined deletions of the respective interacting domains on eRF3 and on Pab1 were viable, did not affect Pab1 function in mRNA stability and harbored an antisuppression phenotype. Our results show that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae the role of the Pab1 C-terminal domain in mRNA stability is independent of eRF3 and the association of these two factors negatively regulates translation termination.     

The 5' UTR of HIV-1 full-length mRNA and the Tat viral protein modulate the programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift that generates HIV-1 enzymes

Translation of the full-length messenger RNA (mRNA) of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) generates the precursor of the viral enzymes via a programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift. Here, using dual-luciferase reporters, we investigated whether the highly structured 5' untranslated region (UTR) of this mRNA, which interferes with translation initiation, can modulate HIV-1 frameshift efficiency. We showed that, when the 5' UTR of HIV-1 mRNA occupies the 5' end of the reporter mRNA, HIV-1 frameshift efficiency is increased about fourfold in Jurkat T-cells, compared with a control dual-luciferase reporter with a short unstructured 5' UTR. This increase was related to an interference with cap-dependent translation initiation by the TAR-Poly(A) region at the 5' end of the messenger. HIV-1 mRNA 5' UTR also contains an internal ribosome entry site (IRES), but we showed that, when the cap-dependent initiation mode is available, the IRES is not used or is weakly used. However, when the ribosomes have to use the IRES to translate the dual-luciferase reporter, the frameshift efficiency is comparable to that of the control dual-luciferase reporter. The decrease in cap-dependent initiation and the accompanying increase in frameshift efficiency caused by the 5' UTR of HIV-1 mRNA is antagonized, in a dose-dependent way, by the Tat viral protein. Tat also stimulates the IRES-dependent initiation and decreases the corresponding frameshift efficiency. A model is presented that accounts for the variations in frameshift efficiency depending on the 5' UTR and the presence of Tat, and it is proposed that a range of frameshift efficiencies is compatible with the virus replication.     

Class-1 polypeptide chain release factors are structurally and functionally similar to suppressor tRNAs and comprise different structural-functional families of prokaryotic/mitochondrial and eukaryotic/archaebacterial factors

Class-1 polypeptide chain release factors (RF) induce peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis in the ribosome if any of the three stop codons encounters the ribosomal A site. We have shown earlier that all factors of this class possess a common functionally essential motif GGQ. In this study we analyzed the primary structures of all known class-1 factors taken from the data banks together with the experimental data available on their structural and functional organization. The following conclusions were drawn. 1. Amino acid sequences of eukaryotic and archaebacterial factors (eRF1 and aRF1, respectively) show high similarity. This suggests the potential ability of eRF1 to function in archaebacterial and aRF1 in eukaryotic ribosomes, and points to their origin from a common ancestor. 2. Primary structures of class-1 release factors from prokaryotes and enkaryotic mitochondria show no statistically significant similarity with archaebacterial and cytoplasmic eukaryotic release factors, except for a common motif GGQ. This confirms our earlier conclusion (Nature, 1994, vol. 372, pp. 701–703) and contradicts the hypothesis of Itoet al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1996, vol. 93, pp. 5443–5448) about structural similarity of all class-1 release factors. 3. All the eRF1/aRF1 recognizing three stop codons have a common motif NIKs that is absent from eubacterial RF1 and RF2, each of which is able to recognize two stop codons of the three. We suppose that the function of the NIKs motif is to fix the proper orientation of eRF1/aRF1 at the ribosome. 4. The domain structure and functional properties of eRF1/aRF1 point to the similarity of these factors with suppressor tRNAs as suggested long ago, and also semblance with aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. 5. Considering that peptidyl-tRNA is fixed at the ribosomal P site while the stop codon and termination factor are at the A site, it may be presumed that the distance between the functionally essential motifs NIKs and GGQS in eRF1/aRF1 should approximately correspond to the distance between the anticodon and the aminoacyl end of aminoacyl-tRNA located at the ribosomal A site.     

lsm1 mutations impairing the ability of the Lsm1p-7p-Pat1p complex to preferentially bind to oligoadenylated RNA affect mRNA decay in vivo

The poly(A) tail is a crucial determinant in the control of both mRNA translation and decay. Poly(A) tail length dictates the triggering of the degradation of the message body in the major 5′ to 3′ and 3′ to 5′ mRNA decay pathways of eukaryotes. In the 5′ to 3′ pathway oligoadenylated but not polyadenylated mRNAs are selectively decapped in vivo, allowing their subsequent degradation by 5′ to 3′ exonucleolysis. The conserved Lsm1p-7p-Pat1p complex is required for normal rates of decapping in vivo, and the purified complex exhibits strong binding preference for oligoadenylated RNAs over polyadenylated or unadenylated RNAs in vitro. In the present study, we show that two lsm1 mutants produce mutant complexes that fail to exhibit such higher affinity for oligoadenylated RNA in vitro. Interestingly, these mutant complexes are normal with regard to their integrity and retain the characteristic RNA binding properties of the wild-type complex, namely, binding near the 3′-end of the RNA, having higher affinity for unadenylated RNAs that carry U-tracts near the 3′-end over those that do not and exhibiting similar affinities for unadenylated and polyadenylated RNAs. Yet, these lsm1 mutants exhibit a strong mRNA decay defect in vivo. These results underscore the importance of Lsm1p-7p-Pat1p complex–mRNA interaction for mRNA decay in vivo and imply that the oligo(A) tail mediated enhancement of such interaction is crucial in that process.     

Crystal structures of the ribosome in complex with release factors RF1 and RF2 bound to a cognate stop codon

During protein synthesis, translational release factors catalyze the release of the polypeptide chain when a stop codon on the mRNA reaches the A site of the ribosome. The detailed mechanism of this process is currently unknown. We present here the crystal structures of the ribosome from Thermus thermophilus with RF1 and RF2 bound to their cognate stop codons, at resolutions of 5.9 Angstrom and 6.7 Angstrom, respectively. The structures reveal details of interactions of the factors with the ribosome and mRNA, including elements previously implicated in decoding and peptide release. They also shed light on conformational changes both in the factors and in the ribosome during termination. Differences seen in the interaction of RF1 and RF2 with the L11 region of the ribosome allow us to rationalize previous biochemical data. Finally, this work demonstrates the feasibility of crystallizing ribosomes with bound factors at a defined state along the translational pathway.     

Modeling the transmembrane arrangement of the uncoupling protein UCP1 and topological considerations of the nucleotide-binding site

The uncoupling protein from brown adipose tissue (UCP1) is a mitochondrial proton transporter whose activity is inhibited by purine nucleotides. UCP1, like the other members of the mitochondrial transporter superfamily, is an homodimer and each subunit contains six transmembrane segments. In an attempt to understand the structural elements that are important for nucleotide binding, a model for the transmembrane arrangement of UCP1 has been built by computational methods. Biochemical and sequence analysis considerations are taken as constraints. The main features of the model include the following: (i) the six transmembrane -helices (TMHs) associate to form an antiparallel helix bundle; (ii) TMHs have an amphiphilic nature and thus the hydrophobic and variable residues face the lipid bilayer; (iii) matrix loops do not penetrate in the core of the bundle; and (iv) the polar core constitutes the translocation pathway. Photoaffinity labeling and mutagenesis studies have identified several UCP1 regions that interact with the nucleotide. We present a model where the nucleotide binds deep inside the bundle core. The purine ring interacts with the matrix loops while the polyphosphate chain is stabilized through interactions with essential Arg residues in the TMH and whose side chains face the core of the helix bundle.