The effect of temperature on the primary reaction of chloroplast Photosystem II Evidence for a temperature-dependent back reaction

The primary reaction of Photosystem II has been studied over the temperature range from −196 to −20 °C. The photooxidation of the reaction-center chlorophyll (P680) was followed by the free-radical electron paramagnetic resonance signal of P680⁺, and the photoreduction of the Photosystem II primary electron acceptor was monitored by the C-550 absorbance change.

At temperatures below −100 °C, the primary reaction of Photosystem II is irreversible. However, at temperatures between −100 and −20 °C a back reaction that is insensitive to 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1′-dimethylurea (DCMU) occurs between P680⁺ and the reduced acceptor.

The amount of reduced acceptor and P680⁺ present under steady-state illumination at temperatures between −100 and −20 °C is small unless high light intensity is used to overcome the competing back reaction. The amount of reduced acceptor present at low light intensity can be increased by adjusting the oxidation-reduction potential so that P680⁺ is reduced by a secondary electron donor (cytochrome b₅₅₉) before P680⁺ can reoxidize the reduced primary acceptor. The photooxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉ and the accompanying photoreduction of C-550 are inhibited by DCMU. The inhibition of C-550 photoreduction by DCMU, the dependence of P680 photooxidation and C-550 photoreduction on light intensity, and the effect of the availability of reduced cytochrome b₅₅₉ on C-550 photoreduction are unique to the temperature range where the Photosystem II primary reaction is reversible and are not observed at lower temperatures.     

A one microsecond component of chlorophyll luminescence suggesting a primary acceptor of system II of photosynthesis different from Q

The kinetics of the luminescence of chlorophyll a in Chlorella vulgaris were studied in the time range from 0.2 μs to 20 μs after a short saturating flash ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 25}\text{ns}$) under various pretreatment including anaerobiosis, flashes, continuous illumination and various additions. A 1 μs luminescence component probably originating from System II was found of which the relative amplitude was maximum under anaerobic conditions for reaction centers in the state SPQ^? before the flash, about one third for centers in the state S⁺PQ^? or SPQ before the flash, and about one tenth for centers in the state S⁺PQ before the flash. S is the secondary donor complex with zero charge; S⁺ is the secondary donor complex with 1 to 3 positive charges; P, the primary donor, is the photoactive chlorophyll a, P-680, of reaction center 2; Q^? is the reduced acceptor of System II, Q. Under aerobic conditions, where an endogenous quencher presumably was active, the luminescence was reduced by a factor two.The 1 μs decay of the luminescence is probably caused by the disappearance of P⁺ formed in the laser flash according to the reaction ZP⁺ → Z⁺P in which Z is the molecule which donates an electron to P⁺ and which is part of S. After addition of hydroxylamine, the 1 μs luminescence component changed with the incubation time exponentially (τ = 27 s) into a 30 μs component; during the same time, the variable fluorescence yield, measured 9 μs after the laser flash, decreased by a factor 2 with the same time constant. Hereafter in a second much slower phase the fluorescence yield decreased as an exponential function of the incubation time to about the dark value; meanwhile the 30 μs luminescence increased about 50% with the same time constant (τ = 7 min). Heat treatment abolished both luminescence components.The 1 μs luminescence component saturated at about the same energy as the System II fluorescence yield 60 μs after the laser flash and as the slower luminescence components. From the observation that the amplitude is maximum if the laser flash is given when the fluorescence yield is high after prolonged anaerobic conditions (state SQ^?), we conclude that the 1 μs luminescence is probably caused by the reaction

$\text{PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv →}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→ PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv}$

in which W is an acceptor different from Q. The presence of S⁺ reduced the luminescence amplitude to about one third. Two models are discussed, one with W as an intermediate between P and Q and another, which gives the best interpretation, with W on a side path.     

Characterization of the low temperature thermoluminescence band Zv in leaf an explanation for its variable nature

Out of the six thermoluminescence bands reported for a mature leaf, one band (Z_v) appearing at the lowest temperatures is dependent on the temperature of illumination. The characteristics of this band in fresh leaf are compared with those in a leaf heated to 60°C for 5 min. It is concluded here that this band, following illumination at temperatures lower than 173 K, is part of Arnold and Azzi's Z band (Arnold, W. and Azzi, J.R. (1971) Photochem. Photobiol. 14, 233–240). However, it is a part of peak I when observed subsequent to illumination beyond 173 K. An explanation for the appearance of this band at different temperatures is proposed.     

The high-energy state of the thylakoid system as indicated by chlorophyll fluorescence and chloroplast shrinkage

Certain long-term fluorescence phenomena observed in intact leaves of higher plants and in isolated chloroplasts show a reverse relationship to light-induced absorbance changes at 535 nm (“chloroplast shrinkage”).

1. 1. In isolated chloroplasts with intact envelopes strong fluorescence quenching upon prolonged illumination with red light is accompanied by an absorbance increase. Both effects are reversed by uncoupling with cyclohexylammonium chloride.

2. 2. The fluorescence quenching is reversed in the dark with kinetics very similar to those of the dark decay of chloroplast shrinkage.

3. 3. In intact leaves under strong illumination with red light in CO₂-free air a low level of variable fluorescence and a strong shrinkage response are observed. Carbon dioxide was found to increase fluorescence and to inhibit shrinkage.

4. 4. Under nitrogen, CO₂ caused fluorescence quenching and shrinkage increase at low concentrations. At higher CO₂ levels fluorescence was increased and shrinkage decreased.

5. 5. In the presence of CO₂, the steady-state yield of fluorescence was lower under nitrogen than under air, whereas chloroplast shrinkage was stimulated in nitrogen and suppressed in air.

6. 6. These results demonstrate that the fluorescence yield does not only depend on the redox state of the quencher Q, but to a large degree also on the high-energy state of the thylakoid system associated with photophosphorylation.

Photooxidation of ferrocyanide and iodide ions and associated phosphorylation in NH2OH-treated chloroplasts

NH₂OH-treated, non-water oxidizing chloroplasts are shown to be capable of oxidizing ferrocyanide and I^? via Photosystem II at appreciable rates (? 200 μequiv/h per mg chlorophyll). Using methylviologen as electron acceptor, ferrocyanide oxidation can be measured as O₂ uptake, as ferricyanide formation, or as H⁺ consumption (2 Fe²⁺ + 2H⁺ + O₂ → 2 Fe³⁺ + H₂O₂). I^? oxidation can be measured as methylviologen-mediated O₂ uptake, or spectrophotometrically, using ferricyanide as electron acceptor. The oxidation product I₂ is re-reduced, as it is formed, by unknown reducing substances in the reaction system.The rate-saturating concentrations of these donors are very high: 30 mM with ferricyanide and 15 mM with I^?. Relatively lipophilic Photosystem II donors such as catechol, benzidine and p-aminophenol saturate the photooxidation rate at much lower concentrations (< 0.5 mM). It thus seems that the oxidation of hydrophilic reductants such as ferricyanide and I^? is limited by permeability barriers. Very likely the site of Photosystem II oxidation is embedded in the thylakoid membrane or is situated on the inner surface of the membrane.The efficiency of phosphorylation (P/e₂) is 0.5 to 0.6 with ferrocyanide and about 0.5 with I^?. In contrast the P/e₂ ratio is 1.0 to 1.2 when water, catechol, p-aminophenol or benzidine serves as electron donor. These differences imply that only one of two phosphorylation sites operate when ferrocyanide and I^? are oxidized. Ferrocyanide and I^? are also chemically distinct from other Photosystem II donors in that their oxidation does not involve proton release. It is suggested that the mechanism of energy conservation associated with Photosystem II may be only operative when the removal of electrons from the donor results in release of protons (i.e. with water, hydroquinones, phenylamines, etc.).     

Photosynthetic oxygen production and the size of the photosynthetic unit in a cell-free preparation from Cyanidium caldarium

A cell-free preparation has been isolated from a mutant of Cyanidium caldarium, grown under conditions such that there is 15 times less chlorophyll per photosynthetic unit than in normal green algae. The preparation is sensitive to 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and shows the well-characterized oscillation of O₂ yield, from saturating flashes, following a period of dark adaptation. Greening experiments with dark-grown, wild-type Cyanidium show that the synthesis of photosynthetic units precedes that of bulk chlorophyll and that the O₂-producing system is assembled before the total system coupled to CO₂. No large-scale cooperation of chlorophyll molecules is required for O₂ production.     

Factors affecting energy transfer from phycobilisomes to thylakoids in Anacystis nidulans

Short illumination with white light of dark-maintained Anacystis nidulans prior to immersion in liquid nitrogen resulted in a marked change of fluorescence emission characteristics at 77 K. The fluorescence of Photosystem II-associated membrane bound pigments increases, while the emission due to phycobilins decreases. This effect seems to be due to a light-dependent alteration in the extent of contact between phycobilisomes and thylakoids, since the effect is reversible in the dark and is abolished by short glutaraldehyde fixation. The preillumination effect is not inhibited by DCMU. Emission spectra obtained with actively growing and CO₂-starved cells indicate that the light-dependent increase in energy transfer from phycobilins to chlorophyll depends upon the physiological state of the cells.     

The kinetics of light-induced changes of C-550, cytochrome b559 and fluorescence yield in chloroplasts at low temperature

The kinetics of the photoreduction of C-550, the photooxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉ and the fluorescence yield changes during irradiation of chloroplasts at ?196 °C were measured and compared. The photoreduction of C-550 proceeded more rapidly than the photooxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉ and the fluorescence yield increase followed the cytochrome b₅₅₉ oxidation. These results suggest that fluorescence yield under these conditions indicates the dark reduction of the primary electron donor to Photosystem II, P680⁺, by cytochrome b₅₅₉ rather than the photoreduction of the primary electron acceptor.The photoreduction of C-550 showed little if any temperature dependence over the range of ?196 to ?100 °C. The amount of cytochrome b₅₅₉ photooxidized was sensitive to temperature decreasing from the maximal change at temperatures between ?196 to ?160 °C to no change at ?100 °C. To the extent that the reaction occurred at temperatures between ?160 and ?100 °C the rate was largely independent of temperature. The rate of the fluorescence increase was dependent on temperature over this range being 3–4 times more rapid at ?100 than at ?160 °C. At ?100 °C the light-induced fluorescence increase and the photoreduction of C-550 show similar kinetics. The temperature dependence of the fluorescence induction curve is attributed to the temperature dependence of the dark reduction of P680⁺.The intensity dependence of the photoreduction of C-550 and of the photooxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉ are linear at low intensities (below 200 μW/cm²) but fall off at higher intensities. The failure of reciprocity in the photoreduction of C-550 at the higher intensities is not explained by the simple model proposed for the Photosystem II reaction centers.