Pathways of silicomolybdate photoreduction and the associated photophosphorylation in tobacco chloroplasts

Three sites of silicomolybdate reduction in the electron transport chain of isolated tobacco chloroplasts are described. The relative participation of these sites is greatly influenced by the particular reaction conditions. One site (the only site when the reaction medium contains high concentrations of bovine serum albumin (> 5 mg/ml)) is associated with Photosystem I, since it supports phosphorylation with a P/e₂ value close to 1 and the reaction is totally sensitive to both plastocyanin inhibitors and 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. Two other sites of silicomolybdate reduction are associated with Photosystem II. One site is 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea insensitive and supports phosphorylation when the reaction mixture contains dimethyl sulfoxide and glycerol (protective agents). The P/e₂ value routinely observed is about 0.2. Bovine serum albumin (1–2 mg/ml) can also act as a protective agent, but the efficiency of Photosystem II phosphorylation observed is lower. Silicomolybdate reduction supports virtually no phosphorylation, regardless of the reduction pathway, when the reaction mixture contains no protective agents. This is due to irreversible uncoupling by silicomolybdate itself. The silicomolybdate uncoupling is potentiated by high salt concentrations even in the presence of protective agents. Exposure of chloroplasts to silicomolybdate in the absence of protective agents rapidly inactivates both photosystems.     

Inhibition of the reoxidation of the secondary electron acceptor of Photosystem II by bicarbonate depletion

In bicarbonate-depleted chloroplasts, the chlorophyll a fluorescence decayed with a halftime of about 150 ms after the third flash, and appreciably faster after the first and second flash of a series of flashes given after a dark period. After the fourth to twentieth flashes, the decay was also slow. After addition of bicarbonate, the decay was fast after all the flashes of the sequence. This indicates that the bicarbonate depletion inhibits the reoxidation of the secondary acceptor R²⁻ by the plastoquinone pool; R is the secondary electron acceptor of pigment system II, as it accepts electrons from the reduced form of the primary electron acceptor (Q⁻). This conclusion is consistent with the measurements of the DCMU (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea)-induced chlorophyll a fluorescence after a series of flashes in the presence and the absence of bicarbonate, if it is assumed that DCMU not only causes reduction of Q if added in the state QR⁻, but also if added in the state QR²⁻.     

The role of chloride ion in Photosystem II I. Effects of chloride ion on Photosystem II electron transport and on hydroxylamine inhibition

1. Chloroplasts washed with Cl^?-free, low-salt media (pH 8) containing EDTA, show virtually no DCMU-insensitive silicomolybdate reduction. The activity is readily restored when 10 mM Cl^? is added to the reaction mixture. Very similar results were obtained with the other Photosystem II electron acceptor 2,5-dimethylquinone (with dibromothymoquinone), with the Photosystem I electron acceptor FMN, and also with ferricyanide which accepts electrons from both photosystems.2. Strong Cl^?-dependence of Hill activity was observed invariably at all pH values tested (5.5–8.3) and in chloroplasts from three different plants: spinach, tobacco and corn (mesophyll).3. In the absence of added Cl^? the functionally Cl^?-depleted chloroplasts are able to oxidize, through Photosystem II, artificial reductants such as catechol, diphenylcarbazide, ascorbate and H₂O₂ at rates which are 4–12 times faster than the rate of the residual Hill reaction.4. The Cl^?-concentration dependence of Hill activity with dimethylquinone as an electron acceptor is kinetically consistent with the typical enzyme activation mechanism: E(inactive) + Cl^?ag E · Cl^? (active), and the apparent activation constant (0.9 mM at pH 7.2) is unchanged by chloroplast fragmentation.5. The initial phase of the development of inhibition of water oxidation in Cl^?-depleted chloroplasts during the dark incubation with NH₂OH ($\text{1}\text{2}$ H₂SO₄) is 5 times slower when the incubation medium contains Cl^? than when the medium contains NH₂OH alone or NH₂OH plus acetate ion. (Acetate is shown to be ineffective in stimulating O₂ evolution.)6. We conclude that the Cl^?-requiring step is one which is specifically associated with the water-splitting reaction, and suggests that Cl^? probably acts as a cofactor (ligand) of the NH₂OH-sensitive, Mn-containing O₂-evolving enzyme.     

Determination and modification of the redox state of the secondary acceptor of Photosystem II in the dark

The redox state of the secondary electron acceptor B of Photosystem II was studied using fluorescence measurements. Preillumination of algae or chloroplasts with a variable number of short saturating flashes followed rapidly by the addition of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea induces oscillations of the initial level of fluorescence. The phase of these oscillations is characteristic of a given $\text{B}\text{B}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratio in the dark-adapted samples.We conclude from our results that about 50% of the secondary electron acceptors are singly reduced in the dark in Chlorella cells, but that more than 70% are fully oxidized in the dark adapted chloroplasts.Benzoquinone treatment modifies this distribution in Chlorella leading to the same situation as in chloroplasts, i.e. more than 70% of the secondary acceptors are oxidized in the dark.The same ratio is observed if these algae are illuminated and then dark-adapted, unless an artificial donor (hydroxylamine) is added before this illumination. In that case about 50% B^? is generated and stabilized in the dark.     

The rapid component of electron paramagnetic resonance signal II: A candidate for the physiological donor to Photosystem II in spinach chloroplasts

Rapid light-induced transients in EPR Signal IIf (F^?+) are observed in 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU)-treated, Tris-washed chloroplasts until the state F P680 Q^? is reached. In the absence of exogenous redox mediators several flashes are required to saturate this photoinactive state. However, the Signal IIf transient is observed on only the first flash following DCMU addition if an efficient donor to Signal IIf, phenylenediamine or hydroquinone, is present. Complementary polarographic measurements show that under these conditions oxidized phenylenediamine is produced only on the first flash of a series. The DCMU inhibition of Signal IIf can be completely relieved by oxidative titration of a one-electron reductant with E′_08.0 = +480 mV. At high reduction potentials the decay time of Signal IIf is constant at about 300 ms, whereas in the absence of DCMU the decay time is longer and increases with increasing reduction potential.A model is proposed in which Q^?, the reduced Photosystem II primary acceptor, and D, a one-electron 480 mV donor endogenous to the chloroplast suspension, compete in the reduction of Signal IIf (F^?+). At high potentials D is oxidized in the dark, and the (Q^? + F^?+) back reaction regenerates the photoactive F P680 Q state. The electrochemical and kinetic evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that the Signal IIf species, F, is identical with Z, the physiological donor to P680.     

Kinetics of reduction of the oxidized primary electron donor of Photosystem II in spinach chloroplasts and in Chlorella cells in the microsecond and nanosecond time ranges following flash excitation

Absorption changes (ΔA) at 820 nm, following laser flash excitation of spinach chloroplasts and Chlorella cells, were studied in order to obtain information on the reduction time of the photooxidized primary donor of Photosystem II at physiological temperatures.In the microsecond time range the difference spectrum of ΔA between 750 and 900 nm represents a peak at 820 nm, attributable to a radical-cation of chlorophyll a. In untreated dark-adapted material the signal can be attributed solely to P⁺?700; it decays in a polyphasic manner with half-times of 17 μs, 210 μs and over 1 ms. The oxidized primary donor of Photosystem II (P⁺_II) is not detected with a time resolution of 3 μs. After treatment with 3–10 mM hydroxylamine, which inhibits the donor side of Photosystem II, P⁺_II is observed and decays biphasically (a major phase with $\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 20–40 μ}\text{s}$, and a minor phase with $\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{? 200 μ}\text{s}$), probably by reduction by an accessory electron donor.In the nanosecond range, which was made accessible by a new fast-response flash photometer operating at 820 nm, it was found the P⁺_II is reduced with a half-time of 25–45 ns in untreated dark-adapted chloroplasts. It is assumed that the normal secondary electron donor is responsible for this fast reduction.     

Light-induced changes of absorbance and electron spin resonance in small Photosystem II particles

Photosystem II reaction center components have been studied in small system II particles prepared with digitonin. Upon illumination the reduction of the primary acceptor was indicated by absorbance changes due to the reduction of a plastoquinone to the semiquinone anion and by a small blue shift of absorption bands near 545 nm (C550) and 685 nm. The semiquinone to chlorophyll ratio was between 1/20 and 1/70 in various preparations. The terminal electron donor in this reaction did not cause large absorbance changes but its oxidized form was revealed by a hitherto unknown electron spin resonance (ESR) signal, which had some properties of the well-known signal II but a linewidth and g-value much nearer to those of signal I. Upon darkening absorbance and ESR changes decayed together in a cyclic or back reaction which was stimulated by 3-(3,4 dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. The donor could be oxidized by ferricyanide in the dark.

Illumination in the presence of ferricyanide induced absorbance and ESR changes, rapidly reversed upon darkening, which may be ascribed to the oxidation of a chlorophyll a dimer, possibly the primary electron donor of photosystem II. In addition an ESR signal with 15 to 20 gauss linewidth and a slower dark decay was observed, which may have been caused by a secondary donor.     

The existence of a high photochemical turnover rate at the reaction centers of System II in Tris-washed chloroplasts

In Tris-washed chloroplasts the kinetics of the primary electron acceptor X 320 of reaction center II has been investigated by fast repetitive flash spectroscopy with a time resolution of $\text{≈ 1 μs}$. It has been found that X 320 is reduced by a flash in $\text{? 1 μs}$. The subsequent reoxidation in the dark occurs mainly by a reaction with a 100–200 μs kinetics. The light-induced difference spectrum confirms X 320 to be the reactive species. From these results it is concluded that in Tris-washed chloroplasts the reaction centers of System II are characterized by a high photochemical turnover rate mediated either via rapid direct charge recombination or via fast cyclic electron flow.     

Photooxidation of cytochrome b559 and the electron donors in chloroplast Photosystem II

The effect of light on the reaction center of Photosystem II was studied by differential absorption spectroscopy in spinach chloroplasts.

At − 196 °C, continuous illumination results in a parallel reduction of C-550 and oxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉ high potential. With flash excitation, C-550 is reduced, but only a small fraction of cytochrome b₅₅₉ is oxidized. The specific effect of flash illumination is suppressed if the chloroplasts are preilluminated by one flash at 0 °C.

At − 50 °C, continuous illumination results in the reduction of C-550 but little oxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉. However, complete oxidation is obtained if the chloroplasts have been preilluminated by one flash at 0 °C. The effect of preillumination is not observed in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.

A model is discussed for the reaction center, with two electron donors, cytochrome b₅₅₉ and Z, acting in competition. Their respective efficiency is dependent on temperature and on their states of oxidation. The specific effect of flash excitation is attributed to a two-photon reaction, possibly based on energy-trapping properties of the oxidized trap chlorophyll.     

Cooperativity between Photosystem II centers at the level of primary electron transfer

1. Spinach chloroplasts, but not whole Chlorella cells, show an acceleration of the Photosystem II turnover time when excited by non-saturating flashes (exciting 25 % of centers) or when excited by saturating flashes for 85–95 % inhibition by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. Following dark adaptation, the turnover is accelerated after a non-saturating flash, preceded by none or several saturating flashes, and primarily after a first saturating flash for 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea inhibition. A rapid phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ approx. 0.75 s) is observed for the deactivation of State S₂ in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.2. These accelerated relaxations suggest that centers of Photosystem II are interconnected at the level of the primary electron transfer and compete for primary oxidizing equivalents in a saturating flash. The model in best agreement with the experimental data consists of a paired interconnection of centers.3. Under the conditions mentioned above, an accelerated turnover may be observed following a flash for centers in S₀, S₁ or S₂ prior to the flash. This acceleration is interpreted in terms of a shift of the rate-limiting steps of Photosystem II turnover from the acceptor to the donor side.     

The back reaction in the primary electron transfer couple of photosystem II of photosynthesis

Changes of C-550, cytochrome b₅₅₉ and fluorescence yield induced in chloroplasts by single saturating flashes were studied at low temperature. A single saturating flash at −196°C was quite ineffective in reducing C-550, oxidizing cytochrome b₅₅₉ or increasing the fluorescence yield, presumably because most of the charge separation induced by the flash was dissipated by a direct back reaction in the primary electron transfer couple. The back reaction, which competes with the dark reduction of the oxidized primary electron donor by a secondary electron donor, becomes increasingly important as the temperature is lowered because of the temperature coefficient of the reaction with the secondary donor. The effect of the back reaction is to lower the quantum yield for the production of stable photochemical products by steady irradiation. Assuming a quantum yield of unity for the photoreduction of C-550 at room temperature, the quantum yield for the reaction is about 0.40 at −100°C and 0.27 at −196°C.     

Evidence for a double hit process in Photosystem II based on fluorescence studies

1. The amplitudes of the fast (0–20 μs) and slow (20 μs–2 ms) fluorescence rise induced by a 2 μs flash have been measured as a function of the energy of the flash in chloroplasts inhibited by 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. The saturation curve for the slow rise shows a characteristic lag which is not observed for the fast fluorescence rise. This lag indicates that Photosystem II centers undergo a double hit process which implies that (a), each photocenter includes two acceptors Q₁ and Q₂; (b), after the first hit, oxidized chlorophyll Chl⁺ is reduced by a secondary acceptor Y in a time short compared to the duration of the flash; (c), after the second hit, Chl⁺ is reduced by another secondary donor, D.

2. According to Den Haan et al. ((1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 368, 409–421), hydroxylamine destroys the secondary donor responsible for the fast reduction of Chl⁺. In the presence of 3 mM hydroxylamine, only the secondary donor D is functional and a flash induces mainly a single hit process.

3. The saturation curves for the fast and the slow rises have been studied in the presence of 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea for a second actinic flash given 2.5 s after a first saturating one. The large decrease in the half-saturating energy indicates the existence of efficient energy transfer occuring between photosynthetic units.

4. Two alternate hypotheses are discussed (a) in which D is an auxiliary donor and (b) in which D is included in the main electron transfer chain.     

Effects of carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone and hydroxylamine on the Photosystem II electron exchange mechanism in 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea treated algae and chloroplasts

The effects of NH₂OH and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) on 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU)-treated algae and chloroplasts were studied. In the presence of DCMU, the photochemically separated charges can only disappear through a recombination back reaction; both substances induce an irreversible reduction of the donor side and after sufficient illumination their action in the presence of DCMU leads to the formation of a permanent fluorescent state.

In the DCMU + CCCP system, a fast fluorescence induction curve is observed. The fluorescence yield is brought to its maximum by two flashes. The luminescence emission is strongly inhibited and most centers reach their permanent fluorescent state after one flash.

In the DCMU + NH₂OH system, a slow fluorescence rise is observed and several saturating flashes are needed for the fluorescence yield to reach its maximum. The exhaustion of the NH₂OH oxidizing capacity and the complete transformation to a permanent fluorescent state also require a large number of flashes.

The reduction pathway catalyzed by CCCP appears to be a good competitor to the back reaction, while NH₂OH seems to be a relatively inefficient donor.

In addition the action of NH₂OH and CCCP on fluorescence suggests that the donor side influences the quenching properties of Photosystem II centers. A possible mechanism is proposed.     

Site-specific inhibition of photophosphorylation in isolated spinach chloroplasts by HgCl2. II. Evidence for three sites of energy conservation associated with non-cyclic electron transport

Energy transfer inhibition by HgCl₂ has been demonstrated to be selective for certain System I partial reactions. On the basis of different HgCl₂ effects on the System I reactions, reduced 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol → methylviologen, diaminodurene → methylviologen and N-phenazine methosulfate cyclic, two sites of energy conservation associated with System I are proposed. Furthermore, these sites are in parallel with each other, in series with the site closely associated with Photosystem II and are shared between non-cyclic and cyclic electron transport.     

Isolation of Photosystem II enriched membrane vesicles from spinach chloroplasts by phase partition

Partition in an aqueous Dextran-polyethylene glycol two-phase system has been used for the separation of chloroplast membrane vesicles obtained by press treatment of a grana-enriched fraction after unstacking in a low salt buffer.

The fractions obtained were analysed with respect to chlorophyll, photochemical activities and ultrastructural characteristics. The results reveal that the material partitioning to the Dextran-rich bottom phase consisted of large membrane vesicles possessing mainly Photosystem II properties with very low contribution from Photosystem I. Measurements of the H₂O to phenyl-p-benzoquinone and ascorbate-Cl₂Ind to NADP⁺ electron transport rates indicate a ratio of around six between Photosystem II and I.

The total fractionation procedure could be completed within 2–3 h with high recovery of both the Photosystem II water-splitting activity and the Photosystem I reduction of NADP⁺.

These data demonstrate that press treatment of low-salt destabilized grana membranes yields a population of highly Photosystem-II enriched membrane vesicles which can be discriminated by the phase system. We suggest that such membrane vesicles originate from large regions in the native grana membrane which contain virtually only Photosystem II.     

The phosphorylation site associated with the oxidation of exogenous donors of electrons to Photosystem I

1. The Photosystem I-mediated transfer of electrons from diaminodurene, diaminotoluene and reduced 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol to methylviologen is optimal at pH 8–8.5, where phosphorylation is also maximal. In the presence of superoxide dismutase, the efficiency of phosphorylation rises from ? 0.1 at pH 6.5 to 0.6–0.7 at pH 8–8.5, regardless of the exogenous electron donor used.2. The apparent K_m (at pH 8.1) for diaminodurene is 6·10^?4 M and for diaminotoluene is 1.2·10^?3 M. The concentrations of diaminodurene and diaminotoluene required to saturate the electron transport processes are > 2 mM and > 5 mM, respectively. At these higher electron donor concentrations the rates of electron transport are markedly increased by phosphorylation (1.5-fold) or by uncoupling conditions (2-fold).3. Kinetic analysis of the transfer of electrons from reduced 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol (DCIPH₂) to methylviologen indicates that two reactions with very different apparent K_m values for DCIPH₂ are involved. The rates of electron flux through both pathways are increased by phosphorylation or uncoupling conditions although only one of the pathways is coupled to ATP formation. No similar complications are observed when diaminodurene or diaminotoluene serves as the electron donor.4. In the diaminodurene → methylviologen reaction, ATP formation and that part of the electron transport dependent upon ATP formation are partially inhibited by the energy transfer inhibitor HgCl₂. This partial inhibition of ATP formation rises to about 50% at less than 1 atom of mercury per 20 molecules of chlorophyll, then does not further increase until very much higher levels of mercury are added.5. It is suggested that exogenous electron donors such as diaminodurene, diaminotoluene and DCIPH₂ can substitute for an endogenous electron carrier in donating electrons to cytochrome f via the mercury-sensitive coupling site (Site I) located on the main electron-transporting chain. If this is so, there would seem to be no reason for postulating yet another coupling site on a side branch of the electron transport chain in order to account for cyclic photophosphorylation.     

Analysis of absorption changes in the ultraviolet related to charge-accumulating electron carriers in Photosystem II of chloroplasts

Spinach chloroplasts were dark adapted and then submitted to a sequence of short saturating flashes. The resulting absorption changes in the near ultraviolet were analyzed and attributed to the donor and acceptor sides of Photosystem II. Our results provide a spectroscopic support to some current models of these parts of the photosynthetic electron transport.In Tris-treated chloroplasts (supplied with artificial donors) the absorption changes are largely due to the acceptor side. After each flash the signal decays with a fast phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 1.2}\text{ms at}\text{9 °}\text{C}$) leaving a stationary level (on a 100-ms time scale). The fast phase has a small amplitude after odd-numbered flashes, whereas the stationary level behaves in a complementary fashion. The non-decaying signal is attributed mostly to the reduced secondary acceptor (A₂^?) and the fast phase to the simultaneous reoxidation of A₂^? and of the reduced primary acceptor (A₁^?). The effect of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea and of redox mediators (ascorbate, ferricyanide) also support this assignment. A fraction of A₂ is shown to be reduced in dark-adapted chloroplasts, as proposed by Velthuys and Amesz (Biochim. Biophys. Acta (1974) 333, 85–94). The difference spectra support the view that A₁^? and A₂^? are plastoquinone radical anions. There are also some absorption changes that we cannot identify.In untreated chloroplasts a non-decaying absorption change (“slow phase”) occurs with a 4-flash periodicity. It is attributed to the transitions among the S states associated with the O₂-evolving complex. A fast phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 1.2}\text{ms}$) in the decay following the first two flashes behaves like in Tris-treated chloroplasts, so that the assignment is tentatively the same. After the third flash, however, the magnitude of this fast phase is too large according to the hypothesis, so that there may be some contribution from the donor side. The fast phases become slower at lower pH (5.5 instead of 7.6), although there is no evidence for a protonation A₁^? or A₂^?.