Hydrophobic interactions mediate binding of the glycine receptor beta-subunit to gephyrin

Glycine receptors (GlyRs) are ligand-gated chloride channel proteins composed of alpha- and beta-subunits. GlyRs are located to and anchored at postsynaptic sites by the receptor-associated protein gephyrin. Previous work from our laboratory has identified a core motif for gephyrin binding in the cytoplasmic loop of the GlyR beta-subunit. Here, we localized amino acid residues implicated in gephyrin binding by site-directed mutagenesis. In a novel transfection assay, a green fluorescent protein-gephyrin binding motif fusion protein was used to monitor the consequences of amino acid substitutions for beta-subunit interaction with gephyrin. Only multiple, but not single, replacements of hydrophobic side chains abolished the interaction between the two proteins. Our data are consistent with gephyrin binding being mediated by the hydrophobic side of an imperfect amphipathic helix.     

Reciprocal stabilization of glycine receptors and gephyrin scaffold proteins at inhibitory synapses

Postsynaptic scaffold proteins immobilize neurotransmitter receptors in the synaptic membrane opposite to presynaptic vesicle release sites, thus ensuring efficient synaptic transmission. At inhibitory synapses in the spinal cord, the main scaffold protein gephyrin assembles in dense molecule clusters that provide binding sites for glycine receptors (GlyRs). Gephyrin and GlyRs can also interact outside of synapses, where they form receptor-scaffold complexes. Although several models for the formation of postsynaptic scaffold domains in the presence of receptor-scaffold interactions have been advanced, a clear picture of the coupled dynamics of receptors and scaffold proteins at synapses is lacking. To characterize the GlyR and gephyrin dynamics at inhibitory synapses, we performed fluorescence time-lapse imaging after photoconversion to directly visualize the exchange kinetics of recombinant Dendra2-gephyrin in cultured spinal cord neurons. Immuno-immobilization of endogenous GlyRs with specific antibodies abolished their lateral diffusion in the plasma membrane, as judged by the lack of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Moreover, the cross-linking of GlyRs significantly reduced the exchange of Dendra2-gephyrin compared with control conditions, suggesting that the kinetics of the synaptic gephyrin pool is strongly dependent on GlyR-gephyrin interactions. We did not observe any change in the total synaptic gephyrin levels after GlyR cross-linking, however, indicating that the number of gephyrin molecules at synapses is not primarily dependent on the exchange of GlyR-gephyrin complexes. We further show that our experimental data can be quantitatively accounted for by a model of receptor-scaffold dynamics that includes a tightly interacting receptor-scaffold domain, as well as more loosely bound receptor and scaffold populations that exchange with extrasynaptic pools. The model can make predictions for single-molecule data such as typical dwell times of synaptic proteins. Taken together, our data demonstrate the reciprocal stabilization of GlyRs and gephyrin at inhibitory synapses and provide a quantitative understanding of their dynamic organization.     

Molecular basis of the γ-aminobutyric acid A receptor α3 subunit interaction with the clustering protein gephyrin

The multifunctional scaffolding protein gephyrin is a key player in the formation of the postsynaptic scaffold at inhibitory synapses, clustering both inhibitory glycine receptors (GlyRs) and selected GABA(A) receptor (GABA(A)R) subtypes. We report a direct interaction between the GABA(A)R α3 subunit and gephyrin, mapping reciprocal binding sites using mutagenesis, overlay, and yeast two-hybrid assays. This analysis reveals that critical determinants of this interaction are located in the motif FNIVGTTYPI in the GABA(A)R α3 M3-M4 domain and the motif SMDKAFITVL at the N terminus of the gephyrin E domain. GABA(A)R α3 gephyrin binding-site mutants were unable to co-localize with endogenous gephyrin in transfected hippocampal neurons, despite being able to traffic to the cell membrane and form functional benzodiazepine-responsive GABA(A)Rs in recombinant systems. Interestingly, motifs responsible for interactions with GABA(A)R α2, GABA(A)R α3, and collybistin on gephyrin overlap. Curiously, two key residues (Asp-327 and Phe-330) in the GABA(A)R α2 and α3 binding sites on gephyrin also contribute to GlyR β subunit-E domain interactions. However, isothermal titration calorimetry reveals a 27-fold difference in the interaction strength between GABA(A)R α3 and GlyR β subunits with gephyrin with dissociation constants of 5.3 μm and 0.2 μm, respectively. Taken together, these observations suggest that clustering of GABA(A)R α2, α3, and GlyRs by gephyrin is mediated by distinct mechanisms at mixed glycinergic/GABAergic synapses.     

Regulation of glycine receptor diffusion properties and gephyrin interactions by protein kinase C

Glycine receptors (GlyRs) can dynamically exchange between synaptic and extrasynaptic locations through lateral diffusion within the plasma membrane. Their accumulation at inhibitory synapses depends on the interaction of the β-subunit of the GlyR with the synaptic scaffold protein gephyrin. An alteration of receptor-gephyrin binding could thus shift the equilibrium between synaptic and extrasynaptic GlyRs and modulate the strength of inhibitory neurotransmission. Using a combination of dynamic imaging and biochemical approaches, we have characterised the molecular mechanism that links the GlyR-gephyrin interaction with GlyR diffusion and synaptic localisation. We have identified a protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation site within the cytoplasmic domain of the β-subunit of the GlyR (residue S403) that causes a reduction of the binding affinity between the receptor and gephyrin. In consequence, the receptor's diffusion in the plasma membrane is accelerated and GlyRs accumulate less strongly at synapses. We propose that the regulation of GlyR dynamics by PKC thus contributes to the plasticity of inhibitory synapses and may be involved in maladaptive forms of synaptic plasticity.     

Mass spectrometric analysis of glycine receptor-associated gephyrin splice variants

Gephyrin is an ubiquitously expressed protein that, in the nervous system, is essential for synaptic anchoring of glycine receptors (GlyRs) and major GABAA receptor subtypes. The binding of gephyrin to the GlyR depends on an amphipathic motif within the large intracellular loop of the GlyRbeta subunit. The mouse gephyrin gene consists of 30 exons. Ten of these exons, encoding cassettes of 5-40 amino acids, are subject to alternative splicing (C1-C7, C4'-C6'). Since one of the cassettes, C5', has recently been reported to exclude GlyRs from GABAergic synapses, we investigated which cassettes are found in gephyrin associated with the GlyR. Gephyrin variants were purified from rat spinal cord, brain, and liver by binding to the glutathione S-transferase-tagged GlyRbeta loop or copurified with native GlyR from spinal cord by affinity chromatography and analyzed by mass spectrometry. In addition to C2 and C6', already known to be prominent, C4 was found to be abundant in gephyrin from all tissues examined. The nonneuronal cassette C3 was easily detected in liver but not in GlyR-associated gephyrin from spinal cord. C5 was present in brain and spinal cord polypeptides, whereas C5' was coisolated mainly from liver. Notably C5'-containing gephyrin bound to the GlyRbeta loop, inconsistent with its proposed selectivity for GABAA receptors. Our data show that GlyR-associated gephyrin, lacking C3, but enriched in C4 without C5, differs from other neuronal and nonneuronal gephyrin isoforms.     

Differential regulation of glycinergic and GABAergic nanocolumns at mixed inhibitory synapses

Super‐resolution imaging has revealed that key synaptic proteins are dynamically organized within sub‐synaptic domains (SSDs). To examine how different inhibitory receptors are regulated, we carried out dual‐color direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM) of GlyRs and GABA_ARs at mixed inhibitory synapses in spinal cord neurons. We show that endogenous GlyRs and GABA_ARs as well as their common scaffold protein gephyrin form SSDs that align with pre‐synaptic RIM1/2, thus creating trans‐synaptic nanocolumns. Strikingly, GlyRs and GABA_ARs occupy different sub‐synaptic spaces, exhibiting only a partial overlap at mixed inhibitory synapses. When network activity is increased by 4‐aminopyridine treatment, the GABA_AR copy numbers and the number of GABA_AR SSDs are reduced, while GlyRs remain largely unchanged. This differential regulation is likely the result of changes in gephyrin phosphorylation that preferentially occurs outside of SSDs. The activity‐dependent regulation of GABA_ARs versus GlyRs suggests that different signaling pathways control the receptors'' sub‐synaptic clustering. Taken together, our data reinforce the notion that the precise sub‐synaptic organization of GlyRs, GABA_ARs, and gephyrin has functional consequences for the plasticity of mixed inhibitory synapses.     

Binding of phosphatase inhibitor-2 to prolyl isomerase Pin1 modifies specificity for mitotic phosphoproteins

Inhibitor-2 (I-2) is the most ancient protein that selectively recognizes type-1 protein phosphatase and is phosphorylated by CDK1-cyclinB during mitosis at Thr72 in a conserved PXTP site. Pin1 is a peptide prolyl cis/trans isomerase conserved among eukaryotes that specifically reacts with proteins phosphorylated at Ser/Thr-Pro sites. We tested phospho-T72-I-2 as a substrate for Pin1 and discovered that unphosphorylated I-2 bound Pin1 with micromolar affinity and phosphorylation of the PXTP site or truncation of I-2 reduced binding 10-fold. Ectopic Pin1 coprecipitated endogenous I-2 and ectopic I-2 coprecipitated endogenous Pin1, but only in the absence of detergents, which may account for the interaction not being detected previously. Endogenous I-2 and Pin1 colocalized in HeLa cells and showed nuclear-cytoplasmic redistribution in response to cell density, suggestive of their association in living cells. Recombinant Pin1 binding to different phosphoproteins in mitotic cell extracts was modulated by I-2, and binding to individual mitotic phosphoproteins was increased, decreased or unaffected by I-2, showing that I-2 allosterically modifies Pin1 specificity. This was confirmed by mutation of Ser16 to Ala in the Pin1 WW domain that eliminated I-2 binding and abrogated I-2 effects on Pin1 binding to different phosphoproteins. A S16E mutation to mimic Pin1 phosphorylation restored binding to both I-2 and phospho-T72-I-2, indicating that phosphorylation of both proteins governs their interaction. The results reveal a novel function for I-2, and suggest phosphorylation-dependent regulation of Pin1 specificity during entry and exit of mitosis, in other phases of the cell cycle, and in multiple cell signaling processes.     

Deciphering the structural framework of glycine receptor anchoring by gephyrin

Glycine is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the spinal cord and brain stem. Gephyrin is required to achieve a high concentration of glycine receptors (GlyRs) in the postsynaptic membrane, which is crucial for efficient glycinergic signal transduction. The interaction between gephyrin and the GlyR involves the E-domain of gephyrin and a cytoplasmic loop located between transmembrane segments three and four of the GlyR beta subunit. Here, we present crystal structures of the gephyrin E-domain with and without the GlyR beta-loop at 2.4 and 2.7 A resolutions, respectively. The GlyR beta-loop is bound in a symmetric 'key and lock' fashion to each E-domain monomer in a pocket adjacent to the dimer interface. Structure-guided mutagenesis followed by in vitro binding and in vivo colocalization assays demonstrate that a hydrophobic interaction formed by Phe 330 of gephyrin and Phe 398 and Ile 400 of the GlyR beta-loop is crucial for binding.     

Structural basis of dynamic glycine receptor clustering by gephyrin

Gephyrin is a bi-functional modular protein involved in molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis and in postsynaptic clustering of inhibitory glycine receptors (GlyRs). Here, we show that full-length gephyrin is a trimer and that its proteolysis in vitro causes the spontaneous dimerization of its C-terminal region (gephyrin-E), which binds a GlyR beta-subunit-derived peptide with high and low affinity. The crystal structure of the tetra-domain gephyrin-E in complex with the beta-peptide bound to domain IV indicates how membrane-embedded GlyRs may interact with subsynaptic gephyrin. In vitro, trimeric full-length gephyrin forms a network upon lowering the pH, and this process can be reversed to produce stable full-length dimeric gephyrin. Our data suggest a mechanism by which induced conformational transitions of trimeric gephyrin may generate a reversible postsynaptic scaffold for GlyR recruitment, which allows for dynamic receptor movement in and out of postsynaptic GlyR clusters, and thus for synaptic plasticity.     

Gephyrin-mediated γ-aminobutyric acid type A and glycine receptor clustering relies on a common binding site

Gephyrin is the major protein determinant for the clustering of inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors. Earlier analyses revealed that gephyrin tightly binds to residues 398-410 of the glycine receptor β subunit (GlyR β) and, as demonstrated only recently, also interacts with GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) containing the α1, α2, and α3 subunits. Here, we dissect the molecular basis underlying the interactions between gephyrin and GABA(A)Rs containing these α-subunits and compare them to the crystal structure of the gephyrin-GlyR β complex. Biophysical and biochemical assays revealed that, in contrast to its tight interaction with GlyR β, gephyrin only loosely interacts with GABA(A)R α2, whereas it has an intermediate affinity for the GABA(A)R α1 and α3 subunits. Despite the wide variation in affinities and the low overall sequence homology among the identified receptor subunits, competition assays confirmed the receptor-gephyrin interaction to be a mutually exclusive process. Selected gephyrin point mutants that critically weaken complex formation with GlyR β also abolished the GABA(A)R α1 and α3 interactions. Additionally, we identified a common binding motif with two conserved aromatic residues that are central for gephyrin binding. Consistent with the biochemical data, mutations of the corresponding residues within the cytoplasmic domain of α2 subunit-containing GABA(A)Rs attenuated clustering of these receptors at postsynaptic sites in hippocampal neurons. Taken together, our experiments provide key insights regarding similarities and differences in the complex formation between gephyrin and GABA(A)Rs compared with GlyRs and, hence, the accumulation of these receptors at postsynaptic sites.     

Identification of a gephyrin-binding motif in the GDP/GTP exchange factor collybistin.

The brain-specific GDP/GTP exchange factor collybistin interacts with the receptor-anchoring protein gephyrin and activates the Rho-like GTPase Cdc42, which is known to regulate actin cytoskeleton dynamics. Alternative splicing creates two collybistin variants, I and II. In coexpression experiments, collybistin II has been shown to induce the formation of submembraneous gephyrin aggregates which cluster with hetero-oligomeric glycine receptors (GlyRs). Here we identified residues critical for interaction with gephyrin in the linker region between the SH3 and the DH domains of collybistin. Respective collybistin deletion mutants failed to bind gephyrin upon coexpression in heterologous cells, in GST pull-down assays and in the yeast two-hybrid system. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed polar amino acid residues as essential determinants of gephyrin binding. Furthermore, in vitro gephyrin bound simultaneously to both collybistin and the GlyR beta-subunit binding motif. Our data are consistent with collybistin-gephyrin interactions occuring during inhibitory postsynaptic membrane formation.     

Isomerase Pin1 Stimulates Dephosphorylation of Tau Protein at Cyclin-dependent Kinase (Cdk5)-dependent Alzheimer Phosphorylation Sites

Neurodegenerative diseases associated with the pathological aggregation of microtubule-associated protein Tau are classified as tauopathies. Alzheimer disease, the most common tauopathy, is characterized by neurofibrillary tangles that are mainly composed of abnormally phosphorylated Tau. Similar hyperphosphorylated Tau lesions are found in patients with frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17) that is induced by mutations within the tau gene. To further understand the etiology of tauopathies, it will be important to elucidate the mechanism underlying Tau hyperphosphorylation. Tau phosphorylation occurs mainly at proline-directed Ser/Thr sites, which are targeted by protein kinases such as GSK3β and Cdk5. We reported previously that dephosphorylation of Tau at Cdk5-mediated sites was enhanced by Pin1, a peptidyl-prolyl isomerase that stimulates dephosphorylation at proline-directed sites by protein phosphatase 2A. Pin1 deficiency is suggested to cause Tau hyperphosphorylation in Alzheimer disease. Up to the present, Pin1 binding was only shown for two Tau phosphorylation sites (Thr-212 and Thr-231) despite the presence of many more hyperphosphorylated sites. Here, we analyzed the interaction of Pin1 with Tau phosphorylated by Cdk5-p25 using a GST pulldown assay and Biacore approach. We found that Pin1 binds and stimulates dephosphorylation of Tau at all Cdk5-mediated sites (Ser-202, Thr-205, Ser-235, and Ser-404). Furthermore, FTDP-17 mutant Tau (P301L or R406W) showed slightly weaker Pin1 binding than non-mutated Tau, suggesting that FTDP-17 mutations induce hyperphosphorylation by reducing the interaction between Pin1 and Tau. Together, these results indicate that Pin1 is generally involved in the regulation of Tau hyperphosphorylation and hence the etiology of tauopathies.     

Neuronal cotransport of glycine receptor and the scaffold protein gephyrin

The dynamics of postsynaptic receptor scaffold formation and remodeling at inhibitory synapses remain largely unknown. Gephyrin, which is a multimeric scaffold protein, interacts with cytoskeletal elements and stabilizes glycine receptors (GlyRs) and individual subtypes of gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors at inhibitory postsynaptic sites. We report intracellular mobility of gephyrin transports packets over time. Gephyrin units enter and exit active synapses within several minutes. In addition to previous reports of GlyR-gephyrin interactions at plasma membranes, we show cosedimentation and coimmunoprecipitation of both proteins from vesicular fractions. Moreover, GlyR and gephyrin are cotransported within neuronal dendrites and further coimmunoprecipitate and colocalize with the dynein motor complex. As a result, the blockade of dynein function or dynein-gephyrin interaction, as well as the depolymerization of microtubules, interferes with retrograde gephyrin recruitment. Our data suggest a GlyR-gephyrin-dynein transport complex and support the concept that gephyrin-motor interactions contribute to the dynamic and activity-dependent rearrangement of postsynaptic GlyRs, a process thought to underlie the regulation of synaptic strength.     

Splice-specific glycine receptor binding, folding, and phosphorylation of the scaffolding protein gephyrin

The multimeric scaffolding protein gephyrin forms post-synaptic clusters at inhibitory sites, thereby anchoring inhibitory glycine (GlyR) and subsets of γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors. Gephyrin is composed of three domains, the conserved N-terminal G- and C-terminal E-domain, connected by the central (C-) domain. In this study we investigated the oligomerization, folding and stability, GlyR β-loop binding, and phosphorylation of three gephyrin splice variants (Geph, Geph-C3, Geph-C4) after expression and purification from insect cells (Sf9). In contrast to Escherichia coli-derived trimeric gephyrin, we found that Sf9 gephyrins form hexamers as basic oligomeric form. In the case of Geph and Geph-C4, also high-oligomeric forms (～900 kDa) were isolated. Partial proteolysis revealed a compact folding of the Gephyrin G and C domain in one complex, whereas a much lower stability for the E domain was found. After GlyR β-loop binding, the stability of the E domain increased in Geph and Geph-C4 significantly. In contrast, the E domain in Geph-C3 is less stable and binds the GlyR β-loop with one order of magnitude lower affinity. Finally, we identified 18 novel phosphorylation sites in gephyrin, of which all except one are located within the C domain. We propose two models for the domain arrangement in hexameric gephyrin based on the oligomerization of either the E or C domains, with the latter being crucial for the regulation of gephyrin clustering.     

Rescue of molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis in gephyrin-deficient mice by a Cnx1 transgene

Gephyrin is a bifunctional protein which is essential for both synaptic clustering of inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the central nervous system and the biosynthesis of the molybdenum cofactor (MoCo) in peripheral tissues. Mice deficient in gephyrin die early postnatally and display a loss of glycine receptors (GlyRs) and many GABA(A) receptor (GABA(A)R) subtypes from postsynaptic sites. In addition, the activities of the MoCo-dependent enzymes xanthine dehydrogenase and sulfite oxidase are reduced to background levels in the liver and intestine of these animals. To genetically separate the different consequences of gephyrin deficiency, we expressed a transgene of the plant homolog Cnx1, known to rescue mammalian MoCo deficiency, on the background of gephyrin knockout mice. Cnx1 partially restored sulfite oxidase activity in the liver of the transgenic animals, whereas early lethality and the loss of GlyR clustering were unaltered. Our data suggest that the loss of neurotransmitter receptor clustering at inhibitory synapses causes the early lethality of gephyrin deficient mice.     

Pin1 Promotes Transforming Growth Factor-��-induced Migration and Invasion

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) regulates a wide variety of biological activities. It induces potent growth-inhibitory responses in normal cells but promotes migration and invasion of cancer cells. Smads mediate the TGF-β responses. TGF-β binding to the cell surface receptors leads to the phosphorylation of Smad2/3 in their C terminus as well as in the proline-rich linker region. The serine/threonine phosphorylation sites in the linker region are followed by the proline residue. Pin1, a peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase, recognizes phosphorylated serine/threonine-proline motifs. Here we show that Smad2/3 interacts with Pin1 in a TGF-β-dependent manner. We further show that the phosphorylated threonine 179-proline motif in the Smad3 linker region is the major binding site for Pin1. Although epidermal growth factor also induces phosphorylation of threonine 179 and other residues in the Smad3 linker region the same as TGF-β, Pin1 is unable to bind to the epidermal growth factor-stimulated Smad3. Further analysis suggests that phosphorylation of Smad3 in the C terminus is necessary for the interaction with Pin1. Depletion of Pin1 by small hairpin RNA does not significantly affect TGF-β-induced growth-inhibitory responses and a number of TGF-β/Smad target genes analyzed. In contrast, knockdown of Pin1 in human PC3 prostate cancer cells strongly inhibited TGF-β-mediated migration and invasion. Accordingly, TGF-β induction of N-cadherin, which plays an important role in migration and invasion, is markedly reduced when Pin1 is depleted in PC3 cells. Because Pin1 is overexpressed in many cancers, our findings highlight the importance of Pin1 in TGF-β-induced migration and invasion of cancer cells.     

Duplicated Gephyrin Genes Showing Distinct Tissue Distribution and Alternative Splicing Patterns Mediate Molybdenum Cofactor Biosynthesis,Glycine Receptor Clustering,and Escape Behavior in Zebrafish

Gephyrin mediates the postsynaptic clustering of glycine receptors (GlyRs) and GABA_A receptors at inhibitory synapses and molybdenum-dependent enzyme (molybdoenzyme) activity in non-neuronal tissues. Gephyrin knock-out mice show a phenotype resembling both defective glycinergic transmission and molybdenum cofactor (Moco) deficiency and die within 1 day of birth due to starvation and dyspnea resulting from deficits in motor and respiratory networks, respectively. To address whether gephyrin function is conserved among vertebrates and whether gephyrin deficiency affects molybdoenzyme activity and motor development, we cloned and characterized zebrafish gephyrin genes. We report here that zebrafish have two gephyrin genes, gphna and gphnb. The former is expressed in all tissues and has both C3 and C4 cassette exons, and the latter is expressed predominantly in the brain and spinal cord and harbors only C4 cassette exons. We confirmed that all of the gphna and gphnb splicing isoforms have Moco synthetic activity. Antisense morpholino knockdown of either gphna or gphnb alone did not disturb synaptic clusters of GlyRs in the spinal cord and did not affect touch-evoked escape behaviors. However, on knockdown of both gphna and gphnb, embryos showed impairments in GlyR clustering in the spinal cord and, as a consequence, demonstrated touch-evoked startle response behavior by contracting antagonistic muscles simultaneously, instead of displaying early coiling and late swimming behaviors, which are executed by side-to-side muscle contractions. These data indicate that duplicated gephyrin genes mediate Moco biosynthesis and control postsynaptic clustering of GlyRs, thereby mediating key escape behaviors in zebrafish.     

Cep55 stabilization is required for normal execution of cytokinesis

Cep55 is a mitotic phosphoprotein that plays an important role in cytokinesis, the final stage of cell division during which physical separation of the two daughter cells is accomplished. We recently demonstrated that the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1 regulates this cell cycle event by enhancing the Plk1-dependent phosphorylation of Cep55. We show here that Cep55 is stabilized post-translationally during mitosis and that siRNA-mediated knockdown of Pin1 prevents this stabilization. Consistent with this, Cep55 is unstable in Pin1 knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Moreover, mutation of the Pin1 binding sites in Cep55 reduces its stability during mitosis. Mutation of the Plk1 phosphorylation site also lowers Cep55 stability, whereas overexpression of Plk1 increases Cep55 levels, in keeping with Pin1 regulating Plk1-mediated phosphorylation of Cep55. Importantly, expression of wild-type Cep55 at levels similar to that of the phosphorylation mutants only partially reverts the cytokinesis defect induced by depletion of Cep55, indicating that inadequate levels of Cep55 prevent proper execution of cytokinesis. Taken together, these data provide more insight into the regulation of the final stages of cell division. As cytokinesis defects can cause chromosomal instability, knowledge about the processes that regulate normal cytokinesis adds to our understanding of events that lead to tumorigenesis.