Engagement of tumor necrosis factor mRNA by an endotoxin-inducible cytoplasmic protein.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production by macrophages plays an important role in the host response to infection. TNF-alpha gene expression in RAW 264.7 macrophages is predominantly regulated at the translational level. A key element in this regulation is an AU-rich (AUR) sequence located in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of TNF mRNA. In unstimulated macrophages, the translation of TNF mRNA is inhibited via this AUR sequence. Upon stimulation with LPS, this repression is overcome and translation occurs. In this study, we attempted to identify cellular proteins that interact with the AUR sequence and thereby regulate TNF mRNA translation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RNA probes corresponding to portions of TNF mRNA 3' UTR were synthesized. These labeled RNAs were incubated with cytoplasmic extracts of either unstimulated or lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. The RNA/protein complexes formed were analyzed by gel retardation. Ultraviolet (UV) cross-linking experiments were performed to determine the molecular weight of the proteins involved in the complexes. RESULTS: TNF mRNA AUR sequence formed two complexes (1 and 2) of distinct electrophoretic mobilities. While the formation of complex 1 was independent of the activation state of the macrophages from which the extracts were obtained, complex 2 was detected only using cytoplasmic extracts from LPS-stimulated macrophages. Upon UV cross-linking, two proteins, of 50 and 80 kD, respectively, were capable of binding the UAR sequence. The 50-kD protein is likely to be part of the LPS-inducible complex 2, since its binding ability was enhanced upon LPS stimulation. Interestingly, complex 2 formation was also triggered by Sendaï virus infection, another potent activator of TNF mRNA translation in RAW 264.7 macrophages. In contrast, complex 2 was not detected with cytoplasmic extracts obtained from B and T cell lines which are unable to produce TNF in response to LPS. Protein tyrosine phosphorylation is required for LPS-induced TNF mRNA translation. Remarkably, the protein tyrosine phosphorylation inhibitor herbimycin A abolished LPS-induced complex 2 formation. Complex 2 was already detectable after 0.5 hr of LPS treatment and was triggered by a minimal LPS dose of 10 pg/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The tight correlation between TNF production and the formation of an LPS-inducible cytoplasmic complex suggests that this complex plays a role in the translational regulation of TNF mRNA.     

A 250-nucleotide UA-rich element in the 3' untranslated region of Xenopus laevis Vg1 mRNA represses translation both in vivo and in vitro.

Xenopus laevis Vgl mRNA undergoes both localization and translational control during oogenesis. Vg1 protein does not appear until late stage IV, after localization is complete. To determine whether Vg1 translation is regulated by cytoplasmic polyadenylation, the RACE-PAT method was used. Vg1 mRNA has a constant poly(A) tail throughout oogenesis, precluding a role for cytoplasmic polyadenylation. To identify cis-acting elements involved in Vg1 translational control, the Vg1 3' UTR was inserted downstream of the luciferase ORF and in vitro transcribed, adenylated mRNA injected into stage III or stage VI oocytes. The Vg1 3' UTR repressed luciferase translation in both stages. Deletion analysis of the Vg1 3' UTR revealed that a 250-nt UA-rich fragment, the Vg1 translational element or VTE, which lies 118 nt downstream of the Vg1 localization element, could repress translation as well as the full-length Vg1 3' UTR. Poly(A)-dependent translation is not necessary for repression as nonadenylated mRNAs are also repressed, but cap-dependent translation is required as introduction of the classical swine fever virus IRES upstream of the luciferase coding region prevents repression by the VTE. Repression by the Vg1 3' UTR has been reproduced in Xenopus oocyte in vitro translation extracts, which show a 10-25-fold synergy between the cap and poly(A) tail. A number of proteins UV crosslink to the VTE including FRGY2 and proteins of 36, 42, 45, and 60 kDa. The abundance of p42, p45, and p60 is strikingly higher in stages I-III than in later stages, consistent with a possible role for these proteins in Vg1 translational control.     

Efficient production of a human tumour necrosis factor in Escherichia coli

To examine the effect of altering the nucleotide sequence of the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) region and the spacer sequence between the SD sequence and the AUG translation start signal, several plasmids were constructed which directed the synthesis of mature human tumour necrosis factor (TNF) under the control of the E. coli trp leader promoter. We found that the presence of the SD sequence, AAGGAGGT, which is complementary to the 3' end of 16S rRNA, gave the higher translational efficiency, and also, the presence of the spacer sequence which consists of only A and T residues raised the production of TNF 2-3 fold. The levels of expression of TNF were elevated over 20-fold by the alteration of the SD and spacer sequences and amounted to 20% of the total cellular proteins or approx. 5 X 10(6) molecules of TNF per cell.     

A highly conserved sequence essential for translational repression of the protamine 1 messenger rna in murine spermatids

Translational regulation of the protamine 1 mRNA is mediated by sequences in its 3' untranslated region. In this study, we demonstrate that a highly conserved sequence, the translational control element, is solely responsible for protamine 1 translational regulation. Mutation of the conserved sequence causes premature translation of a transgene containing a fusion between the human growth hormone coding sequence and the protamine 1 3' untranslated region. Temporal expression of the transgene was monitored in prepubertal animals by Northern and Western blotting and in adult animals by immunocytochemistry. Messenger RNAs lacking the translational control element sediment in the messenger ribonucleoprotein particle and ribosomal fractions of polysome gradients, suggesting that the translational control element is required for translational repression but not for incorporation of mRNAs into ribonucleoprotein particles.     

Rna15 Interaction with the A-Rich Yeast Polyadenylation Signal Is an Essential Step in mRNA 3′-End Formation

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, four factors [cleavage factor I (CF I), CF II, polyadenylation factor I (PF I), and poly(A) polymerase (PAP)] are required for maturation of the 3' end of the mRNA. CF I and CF II are required for cleavage; a complex of PAP and PF I, which includes CF II subunits, participates in polyadenylation, along with CF I. These factors are directed to the appropriate site on the mRNA by two sequences: one A-rich and one UA-rich. CF I contains five proteins, two of which, Rna15 and Hrp1, interact with the mRNA through RNA recognition motif-type RNA binding motifs. Previous work demonstrated that the UV cross-linking of purified Hrp1 to RNA required the UA-rich element, but the contact point of Rna15 was not known. We show here that Rna15 does not recognize a particular sequence in the absence of other proteins. However, in complex with Hrp1 and Rna14, Rna15 specifically interacts with the A-rich element. The Pcf11 and Clp1 subunits of CF I are not needed to position Rna15 at this site. This interaction is essential to the function of CF I. A mutant Rna15 with decreased affinity for RNA is defective for in vitro RNA processing and lethal in vivo, while an RNA with a mutation in the A-rich element is not processed in vitro and can no longer be UV cross-linked to the Rna15 subunit assembled into CF I. Thus, the recognition of the A-rich element depends on the tethering of Rna15 through an Rna14 bridge to Hrp1 bound to the UA-rich motif. These results illustrate that the yeast 3' end is defined and processed by a mechanism surprisingly different from that used by the mammalian system.     

Mos 3' UTR regulatory differences underlie species-specific temporal patterns of Mos mRNA cytoplasmic polyadenylation and translational recruitment during oocyte maturation

The Mos proto-oncogene is a critical regulator of vertebrate oocyte maturation. The maturation-dependent translation of Mos protein correlates with the cytoplasmic polyadenylation of the maternal Mos mRNA. However, the precise temporal requirements for Mos protein function differ between oocytes of model mammalian species and oocytes of the frog Xenopus laevis. Despite the advances in model organisms, it is not known if the translation of the human Mos mRNA is also regulated by cytoplasmic polyadenylation or what regulatory elements may be involved. We report that the human Mos 3' untranslated region (3' UTR) contains a functional cytoplasmic polyadenylation element (CPE) and demonstrate that the endogenous Mos mRNA undergoes maturation-dependent cytoplasmic polyadenylation in human oocytes. The human Mos 3' UTR interacts with the human CPE-binding protein and exerts translational control on a reporter mRNA in the heterologous Xenopus oocyte system. Unlike the Xenopus Mos mRNA, which is translationally activated by an early acting Musashi/polyadenylation response element (PRE)-directed control mechanism, the translational activation of the human Mos 3' UTR is dependent on a late acting CPE-dependent process. Taken together, our findings suggest a fundamental difference in the 3' UTR regulatory mechanisms controlling the temporal induction of maternal Mos mRNA polyadenylation and translational activation during Xenopus and mammalian oocyte maturation.     

A cis-acting element in the coding region of cyclin B1 mRNA couples subcellular localization to translational timing

Subcellular localization of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) to correct sites and translational activation at appropriate timings are crucial for normal progression of various biological events. However, a molecular link between the spatial regulation and temporal regulation remains unresolved. In immature zebrafish oocytes, translationally repressed cyclin B1 mRNA is localized to the animal polar cytoplasm and its temporally regulated translational activation in response to a maturation-inducing hormone is essential to promote oocyte maturation. We previously reported that the coding region of cyclin B1 mRNA is required for the spatio-temporal regulation. Here, we report that a sequence, CAGGAGACC, that is conserved in the coding region of vertebrate cyclin B1 mRNA is involved in the regulation. Like endogenous cyclin B1 mRNA, reporter mRNAs harboring the sequence CAGGAGACC were localized to the animal polar cytoplasm of oocytes, while those carrying mutations in the sequence (with no change in the coding amino acids) were dispersed in the animal hemisphere of oocytes. Furthermore, translational activation of the mutant mRNAs was initiated at a timing earlier than that of endogenous and wild-type reporter mRNAs during oocyte maturation. Interaction of CAGGAGACC with proteins in vitro suggests that this sequence functions in collaboration with a trans-acting protein factor(s) in oocytes. These findings reveal that the sequence in the coding region of cyclin B1 mRNA plays an important role as a cis-acting element in both subcellular localization and translational timing of mRNA, providing a direct molecular link between the spatial and temporal regulation of mRNA translation.     

A novel mRNA 3' untranslated region translational control sequence regulates Xenopus Wee1 mRNA translation

Cell cycle progression during oocyte maturation requires the strict temporal regulation of maternal mRNA translation. The intrinsic basis of this temporal control has not been fully elucidated but appears to involve distinct mRNA 3′ UTR regulatory elements. In this study, we identify a novel translational control sequence (TCS) that exerts repression of target mRNAs in immature oocytes of the frog, Xenopus laevis, and can direct early cytoplasmic polyadenylation and translational activation during oocyte maturation. The TCS is functionally distinct from the previously characterized Musashi/polyadenylation response element (PRE) and the cytoplasmic polyadenylation element (CPE). We report that TCS elements exert translational repression in both the Wee1 mRNA 3′ UTR and the pericentriolar material-1 (Pcm-1) mRNA 3′ UTR in immature oocytes. During oocyte maturation, TCS function directs the early translational activation of the Pcm-1 mRNA. By contrast, we demonstrate that CPE sequences flanking the TCS elements in the Wee1 3′ UTR suppress the ability of the TCS to direct early translational activation. Our results indicate that a functional hierarchy exists between these distinct 3′ UTR regulatory elements to control the timing of maternal mRNA translational activation during oocyte maturation.     

Dual functionality of a plant U-rich intronic sequence element

In potato invertase genes, the constitutively included, 9-nucleotide (nt)-long mini-exon requires a strong branchpoint and U-rich polypyrimidine tract for inclusion. The strength of these splicing signals was demonstrated by greatly enhanced splicing of a poorly spliced intron and by their ability to support splicing of an artificial mini-exon, following their introduction. Plant introns also require a second splicing signal, UA-rich intronic elements, for efficient intron splicing. Mutation of the branchpoint caused loss of mini-exon inclusion without loss of splicing enhancement, showing that the same U-rich sequence can function as either a polypyrimidine tract or a UA-rich intronic element. The distinction between the splicing signals depended on intron context (the presence or absence of an upstream, adjacent and functional branchpoint), and on the sequence context of the U-rich elements. Polypyrimidine tracts tolerated C residues while UA-rich intronic elements tolerated As. Thus, in plant introns, U-rich splicing elements can have dual roles as either a general plant U-rich splicing signal or a polypyrimidine tract. Finally, overexpression of two different U-rich binding proteins enhanced intron recognition significantly. These results highlight the importance of co-operation between splicing signals, the importance of other nucleotides within U-rich elements for optimal binding of competing splicing factors and effects on splicing efficiency of U-rich binding proteins.     

Communication between NF-kappa B and Sp1 controls histone acetylation within the proximal promoter of the monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 gene

The induction of the monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 gene (MCP-1) by TNF occurs through an NF-kappaB-dependent distal regulatory region and an Sp1-dependent proximal regulatory region that are separated by 2.2 kb of sequence. To investigate how these regions coordinate activation of MCP-1 in response to TNF, experiments were performed to examine the role of coactivators, changes in local chromatin structure, and the acetylation of histones at the MCP-1 regulatory regions. An E1a-sensitive coactivator was found to be required for expression. In vivo nuclease sensitivity assays identified changes in response to TNF at both the proximal and distal regions that were dependent on the p65 subunit of NF-kappaB and Sp1. Chromatin immunoprecipitations used to analyze factor assembly and histone acetylation at the distal and proximal regions showed that Sp1 binding to and histone acetylation of the proximal region was dependent on NF-kappaB p65. Conversely, Sp1 assembly at the proximal region was required for p65 binding to and acetylation of the distal region, suggesting communication between the two regions during gene activation. These data and the NF-kappaB p65-dependent histone acetylation of a middle region sequence suggest a potential order for the assembly, acetylation and accessibility of the MCP-1 regulatory regions in response to TNF.     

Translational regulation of the expression of ribosomal protein genes in Xenopus laevis

The mRNAs coding for ribosomal proteins (rp-mRNA) are subjected to translational control during Xenopus oogenesis and embryogenesis, and also during nutritional changes in Xenopus cultured cells. This regulation, which appears to respond to the cellular need for new ribosomes, operates by changing the fraction of rp-mRNA engaged on polysomes, each translated rp-mRNA molecule always remaining fully loaded with ribosomes. All rp-mRNAs analyzed up to now show this translational behavior, and also share some structural features in their untranslated portions. In particular they all have rather short 5' untranslated regions, similar to each other, and always start at the very 5' end with a stretch of several pyrimidines. Fusion to a reporter-coding sequence of the 5' untranslated region of r-protein S19 has shown that this is involved in the translational regulation.