Endocrine treatment of prostate cancer

Although androgen deprivation as a treatment for patients with prostate cancer was described more than 60 years ago its optimal use remains controversial. The widespread use of prostate-specific (PSA) assay has lead to earlier diagnosis and earlier detection of recurrent disease. This means that the systemic side effects of androgen deprivation and quality of life have become more important. Debates continue regarding the proper use and timing of endocrine therapy with orchiectomy, oestrogen agonists, gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, GnRH antagonists, and androgen antagonists. A critical review of the literature was performed. Data support that androgen deprivation is an effective treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer. However, although it improves survival, it is not curative, and creates a spectrum of unwanted effects that influence quality of life. Castration remains the frontline treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, where orchiectomy, oestrogen agonists and GnRH agonists produce equivalent clinical responses. Maximum androgen blockade (MAB) is not significantly more effective than single agent GnRH agonist or orchiectomy. Nonsteroidal antiandrogen monotherapy is as effective as castration in treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer offering quality of life benefits. Adjuvant endocrine treatment is able to delay disease progression at any stage. There is, however, controversy of the possible survival benefit of such treatment, including patients having PSA relapse after definitive local treatment for prostate cancer. Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment has its place mainly in the external beam radiotherapy setting. Intermittent androgen blockade is still considered experimental. The decision regarding the type of androgen deprivation should be made individually after informing the patient of all available treatment options, including watchful waiting, and on the basis of potential benefits and adverse effects. Several large studies are under way to investigate the role of adjuvant endocrine treatment in the field of early prostate cancer, intermittent androgen deprivation and endocrine therapy alone compared with endocrine therapy with radiotherapy. The real challenge, however, is to develop better means to avert hormone-refractory prostate cancer and better treatments for patients with hormone-refractory disease when it occurs.     

Androgen deprivation therapy in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

This article reviews the issues and controversies relevant to the treatment of advanced prostate cancer with androgen deprivation therapy. Initially, diethylstilbestrol was used for achieving androgen deprivation, but was replaced by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH). Adverse events associated with LHRH agonists include the flare phenomenon, hot flashes, loss of libido, erectile dysfunction, depression, muscle wasting, anemia, and osteoporosis. Intermittent therapy has been advocated to reduce morbidity of treatment. The addition of an antiandrogen provides maximum androgen blockade. There remains controversy regarding the timing of the addition of an antiandrogen. Secondary hormonal therapies include antiandrogens, adrenal androgen inhibitors, and estrogens.     

Effective Testosterone Suppression for Prostate Cancer: Is There a Best Castration Therapy?

Achieving and maintaining effective suppression of serum testosterone levels in men treated with androgen ablation is one of the essential strategies in the management of prostate cancer. Historically, a serum testosterone below 50 ng/dL was considered to be the castrate level. Current data suggest that the new target for either surgical or chemical castration is a serum testosterone level of lower than 20 ng/dL in an attempt to maximize therapeutic outcomes. Testosterone breakthrough and the acute-on-chronic effects of administration of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue may cause testosterone levels to periodically rise, sometimes to noncastrate levels. The goal of androgen ablation is to identify those agents that will most consistently achieve and maintain the lowest testosterone levels possible.Key words: Prostate cancer, Androgen ablation, LHRH analogues, LHRH antagonists, TestosteroneThe cornerstone of understanding the basic biology of prostate cancer relies upon the important discovery that prostate cancer is a hormonally responsive tumor. The current use of androgen ablation therapy in prostate cancer includes treatment based on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) only or local recurrence; neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of high-risk disease, usually in combination with radiation therapy; and treatment of patients with metastatic disease regardless of symptoms. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2007 guidelines and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2009 guidelines recommend either luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists or bilateral orchiectomy as first-line therapy for men with advanced prostate cancer.^1,2Medical or chemical castration is almost exclusively performed by the use of injectable LHRH analogues, with a minor role for estrogen and limited experience with LHRH antagonists. Surgical castration through bilateral orchiectomy is infrequently used today.Intermittent hormonal therapy (IHT) is being investigated as an alternative to continuous hormonal therapy with a potential for reduced morbidity and a delay of the progression to hormone-refractory disease.³ Although intermittent therapy may rely upon restoring a normal testosterone level, it is believed that the testosterone level should be as low as possible when the patient is on treatment, thus generating the lowest serum PSA level possible and likely improving outcome.⁴ Although the data on IHT are promising, trials reported thus far are relatively small and somewhat underpowered, and it is likely that its use will increase in the future as trials mature.There is growing recognition that many men may not achieve acceptable levels of testosterone using androgen ablation. This has led to a renewed interest in the significance of the testosterone level in the modern era of prostate cancer management. Can we define the best castration therapy for prostate cancer? Is this the therapy that provides the lowest and most consistent levels of testosterone suppression? To quote Dr. Claude Schulman in a recent editorial: “less is more.”⁵     

Androgen deprivation and other treatments for advanced prostate cancer

Among the issues discussed at this year's meeting on prostate cancer in Vail, Colorado, were several that specifically relate to the patient with advanced disease. Dr. E. David Crawford addressed the issue of the timing of hormone therapy, specifically reviewing several important trials that give a glimpse at the potential outcome of aggressive treatment in stage D1.5. The efficacy of antiandrogens, flutamide, bicalutamide, and nilutamide, when combined with chemical or surgical castration, was reviewed. Dr. Arturo Mendoza-Valdes reviewed the rationale behind intermittent (versus continuous) total androgen blockade, especially as related to quality of life. Dr. Paul Miller gave an update on the role of bisphosphonates as adjuvant therapy for prostate cancer. Also discussed was an important new agent for androgen deprivation, Abarelix, a sustained-release GnRH antagonist with low histamine-releasing potential which avoids testosterone and other hormone surge and flare.     

Prostate cancer: Re-focusing on androgen receptor signaling

Prostate cancer is the most common, non-dermatologic cancer in men. Since prostate cancer is highly associated with increased age, the incidence of this disease is expected to increase as the population ages. In its initial stages prostate cancer depends upon the actions of androgen, and androgen deprivation therapy induces tumor regression. Currently, androgen deprivation is achieved by either surgical or chemical androgen blockade. Unfortunately, nearly all prostate cancer patients develop tumors that grow despite androgen blockade and ultimately relapse. Many alterations in prostate cancer cells contribute to this state. Although chemotherapy induces short remissions in some patients, there are no curative therapies for metastatic disease. This review summarizes our current understanding in androgen signaling and the mechanisms that allow tumor cells to bypass androgen manipulation therapy. The identification of novel survival pathways and effector molecules that drive androgen independent growth is necessary to develop effective therapies for advanced prostate cancers.     

Androgen supplementation and prostate cancer risk: strategies for pretherapy assessment and monitoring

Since in men androgen levels decrease with age and result in symptoms of hypogonadism, the use of testosterone supplementation to treat symptoms resulting from hypogonadism is increasing. One potential complication of this treatment is the possibility of an increased risk of prostate cancer. Although most authorities agree that androgen is involved in the exacerbation of existing carcinoma of the prostate, the action of androgens on the carcinogenic process is not well understood. Attempts to demonstrate a correlation between hormone levels and prostate cancer have yielded inconsistent results. No clear evidence exists that androgen supplementation to restore physiologic levels produces any deleterious effects on the prostate. It is highly doubtful that when testosterone therapy is administered to middle-aged or older men, any potential prostate cancer promotion effect will be clinically manifested in the absence of already established cancer. It is, however, imperative that existing or developing prostate cancer be ruled out before initiation and during androgen replacement therapy. As with any therapeutic regimen, careful monitoring of the patient receiving treatment is recommended and constitutes good medical care.     

Emerging pharmacologic therapies for prostate cancer

The last decade has seen explosive growth in the therapy of prostate cancer. Three areas of therapeutics are emerging: 1) new compounds with novel uses; 2) available compounds with new applications; and 3) new compounds applied to established indications. The novel compounds target specific receptor sites of cancer pathways and attack cancer cells with less effect on normal tissue. Earlyphase trials with compounds targeting the endothelin-A and EGF receptors have shown encouraging results in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. In addition, the Early Prostate Cancer Trial of over 8000 men is currently underway to determine the benefit of adjuvant androgen ablation with bicalutamide in men with localized prostate cancer. Early results show a significant 42% reduction in the progression of the disease in the bicalutamide treatment arm. Further, in large, phase 3 clinical trials in patients needing androgen ablation, the GnRH antagonist abarelix caused no testosterone surge and demonstrated a significantly more rapid decline in serum testosterone to the castrate level than did an LHRH agonist analogue. Abarelix should thus have application as a monotherapy in patients who need a rapid onset of action or are at high risk of complications from the clinical flare seen with LHRH agonists. Abarelix also uniquely caused a sustained decline in serum FSH levels, which have been shown in vitro to stimulate prostate cancer cell growth. If these favorable effects can be duplicated in patients, abarelix might also offer a survival benefit.     

Hormonal therapy for stage D cancer of the prostate.

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate is the most common malignant neoplasm occurring in men. About half of patients present with metastatic disease. The mainstay of the treatment of stage D cancer of the prostate is hormonal therapy. Bilateral simple orchiectomy remains the gold standard with which other therapies must be compared. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues and antiandrogens are now most commonly used but are costly. Initiating hormonal therapy immediately on diagnosing metastatic disease appears to have some advantage over delaying therapy until a patient is symptomatic. Total androgen blockade also appears to be beneficial in terms of survival but at high cost.     

The evolution of hormonal therapy for prostatic carcinoma

It is well recognized that testosterone has a number of untoward effects on prostatic carcinoma and that castration is associated with significant tumor shrinkage and resolution of symptoms of advanced prostatic carcinoma. Approaches to hormonal therapy have evolved significantly over the last several decades. Initially castration was utilized, which provided effective reduction of testicular androgens, but with adverse psychological factors. The next approach was utilization of diethylstilbestrol, but with significant cardiovascular toxicity in higher doses. The development of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists provided an improvement in pharmacologic castration; however, they are associated with a transient testosterone surge and the potential for exacerbation of clinical manifestations of advanced prostate carcinoma (the so-called "testosterone flare"). Recently, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been investigated. Abarelix is a pure GnRH antagonist that blocks the anterior pituitary receptor, resulting in prompt and significant reduction not only of luteinizing hormone but also follicle-stimulating hormone. This results in castrate levels of testosterone while avoiding the testosterone surge.     

Histopathological changes induced by therapies in the benign prostate and prostate adenocarcinoma

The effect of androgen deprivation and other hormonal therapies, radiation therapy, thermal ablation therapies, chemotherapy, and other systemic treatments is evident in the histology of non-neoplastic and neoplastic human prostate gland. Androgen deprivation may be achieved with: a. orchidectomy, b. exogenous oestrogen administration, c. drugs with the capacity to deplete the hypothalamus of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, d. antiandrogens administration: drugs, which block the conversion of testosterone to its active form of 5-alpha dihydrotestosterone (i.e. finasteride, dutasteride), and drugs which block the androgen receptor on individual cells (i.e. flutamide). Androgen deprivation therapies cause atrophy of non-neoplastic and neoplastic prostatic epithelium, as the result of apoptosis, and are mainly used as a palliative measure in metastatic prostate cancer or as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment, in clinically localized prostate cancer. Morphological tumour regression may complicate the recognition and grading of treated carcinomas in radical prostatectomy specimens. Radiation therapy may be applied in the form of external beam, interstitial implantation (brachytherapy), or a combination, as a mainstay or adjuvant (external beam) treatment in localized prostate cancer. The primary effect is the damage of endothelial cells, which cause ischemia that leads to atrophy. The difficulty of post-radiation prostate needle biopsy interpretation includes the distinction of treatment effect in normal prostatic tissue from recurrent or residual tumour. Histological changes after thermal ablation mainly include lesions observed in prostatic infarcts due to periurethral coagulative type necrosis of variable volume. The correlation between the histopathological effects of the above therapies and their clinical significance is not absolutely clear.     

Prostate cancer risk in testosterone-treated men

Men with classical androgen deficiency have reduced prostate volume and blood prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels compared with their age peers. As it is plausible that androgen deficiency partially protects against prostate disease, and that restoring androgen exposure increases risk to that of eugonadal men of the same age, men using ART should have age-appropriate surveillance for prostate disease. This should comprise rectal examination and blood PSA measurement at regular intervals (determined by age and family history) according to the recommendations, permanently revisited, published by ISSAM, EAU, Endocrine Society….

Testosterone replacement therapy is now being prescribed more often for aging men, the same population in which prostate cancer incidence increases; it has been suggested that administration in men with unrecognised prostate cancer might promote the development of clinically significant disease. In hypogonadal men who were candidates for testosterone therapy, a 14% incidence of occult cancer was found. A percentage (15.2%) of prostate cancer has been found in the placebo group (with normal DRE and PSA) in the prostate cancer prevention study investigating the chemoprevention potential of finasteride.

The hypothesis that high levels of circulating androgens is a risk factor for prostate cancer is supported by the dramatic regression, after castration, of tumour symptoms in men with advanced prostate cancer. However these effects, seen at a very late stage of cancer development, may not be relevant to reflect the effects of variations within a physiological range at an earlier stage.

Data from all published prospective studies on circulating level of total and free testosterone do not support the hypothesis that high levels of circulating androgens are associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. A study on a large prospective cohort of 10,049 men, contributes to the gathering evidence that the long standing “androgen hypothesis” of increasing risk with increasing androgen levels can be rejected, suggesting instead that high levels within the reference range of androgens, estrogens and adrenal androgens decrease aggressive prostate cancer risk. Indeed, high-grade prostate cancer has been associated with low plasma level of testosterone. Furthermore, pre-treatment total testosterone was an independent predictor of extraprostatic disease in patients with localized prostate cancer; as testosterone decreases, patients have an increased likelihood of non-organ confined disease and low serum testosterone levels are associated with positive surgical margins in radical retropubic prostatectomy.

A clinical implication of these results concerns androgen supplementation which has become easier to administer with the advent of transdermal preparations (patch or gel) that achieve physiological testosterone serum levels without supra physiological escape levels. During the clinical development of a new testosterone patch in more than 200 primary or secondary hypogonadal patients, no prostate cancer was diagnosed.     

Tissue and serum levels of principal androgens in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer

Androgens are considered to play a substantial role in pathogenesis of both benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer. The importance of determination of androgen levels in tissue and serum for cancer progression and prognosis has been poorly understood. The aim of study was to find out hormonal differences in both diseases, their correlations between intraprostatic and serum levels and predicted value of their investigation. Testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione and also epitestosterone were determined in prostate tissue from 57 patients who underwent transvesical prostatectomy for BPH and 121 patients after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. In 75 subjects with cancer and 51 with BPH the serum samples were analyzed for testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and SHBG. Significantly higher intraprostatic androgen concentrations, i.e. 8.85+/-6.77 versus 6.44+/-6.43 pmol/g, p<0.01 for dihydrotestosterone, and 4.61+/-7.02 versus 3.44+/-4.53 pmol/g, p<0.05 for testosterone, respectively, were found in patients with prostate cancer than in BPH. Higher levels in cancer tissue were found also for epitestosterone. However, no differences were found in serum levels. Highly significant correlations occurred between all pairs of intraprostatic androgens and also epitestosterone as well as between serum testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (p<0.001) in both BPH and cancer groups. Correlation was not found between corresponding tissue and serum testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, either in benign or cancer samples. The results point to importance of intraprostatic hormone levels for evaluation of androgen status of patients, contrasting to a low value of serum hormone measurement.     

Psoriasis exacerbation after hormonotherapy in prostate cancer patient—Case report

Psoriasis, as the most common inflammatory skin disorder, affects about 2–3% of the world''s population. Many non-dermatological conditions have been linked with psoriasis, including cardiovascular diseases, depression, inflammatory bowel disorders, and some cancers, i.e. lung, colon and kidney cancers. Among systemic factors are endocrine and metabolic disturbances as well as many drugs. Erythrodermic psoriasis, the most severe form of the disease, is characterized by diffuse erytrema and scaling, often accompanied by fever, chills, and malaise.A 57-year-old Caucasian man was admitted for curative radiation therapy of adenocarcinoma of the prostate after 3 months of initial hormonal therapy. The management comprised the combined androgen blockade (CAB). On admission the patient reported escalation of psoriasis symptoms, which he had been treated for since 2002. Due to a mild course of the disease he had not required any systemic treatment ever before, even during aggravation periods. The last exacerbation started appearing a month after hormonal therapy implementation. The cutaneous eruptions, already existing, become larger with new foci revealing, mainly on upper and lower limbs. During radiotherapy planning, there appeared a diffuse erythema and scaling on hands and feet with accompanying pruritis. We decided to start the previously planned radiation therapy which included the prostate gland with 1.5 cm margin and provided for the total dose of 72 Gy in 36 fractions. The irradiation was conducted with the four-field technique using a megavoltage linear accelerator. During radiotherapy we photo-documented skin lesions.To our best knowledge hormone therapy (androgen deprivation) of prostate cancer patients has not been reported as an aggravating factor. Thus, the aim of our work is to present the case of a prostate cancer patient who experienced psoriasis exacerbation after implementation of hormonal blockade as a neoadjuvant oncological treatment.     

2-phenyl-4-piperazinylbenzimidazoles: orally active inhibitors of the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor

Antagonism of the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor has shown positive clinical results in numerous reproductive tissue disorders such as endometriosis, prostate cancer and others. Traditional therapy has been limited to peptide agonists and antagonists. Recently, small molecule GnRH antagonists have emerged as potentially new treatments. This article describes the discovery of 2-phenyl-4-piperazinylbenzimidazoles as small molecule GnRH antagonists with nanomolar potency in in vitro binding and functional assays, excellent bioavailability (rat %F>70) and demonstrated oral activity in a rat model having shown significant serum leuteinizing hormone (LH) suppression.     

Major impact of hormonal therapy in localized prostate cancer--death can already be an exception

For about 50 years, androgen blockade in prostate cancer has been limited to monotherapy (surgical castration) or high doses of estrogens in patients with advanced disease and bone metastases. The discovery of medical castration with LHRH agonists has led to fundamental changes in the endocrine therapy of prostate cancer. In 1979, the first prostate cancer patient treated with an LHRH agonist received such treatment at the Laval University Medical Center. A long series of studies have clearly demonstrated that medical castration with an LHRH agonist has inhibitory effects on prostate cancer equivalent to those of surgical castration. The much higher acceptability of LHRH agonists has been essential to permit a series of studies in localized disease. Based upon the finding that the testicles and adrenals contribute approximately equal amounts of androgens in the human prostate, the combination of medical (LHRH agonist) or surgical castration associated with a pure antiandrogen (flutamide, nilutamide or bicalutamide) has led to the first demonstration of a prolongation of life in prostate cancer, namely a 10–20% decreased risk of death according to the various metaanalyses of all the studies performed in advanced disease. In analogy with the other types of advanced cancers, the success of combined androgen blockade in metastatic disease is limited by the development of resistance to treatment. To avoid the problem of resistance to treatment while taking advantage of the relative ease of diagnosis of prostate cancer at an “early” stage, the much higher acceptability of LHRH agonists has permitted a series of studies which have demonstrated a major reduction in deaths from prostate cancer ranging from 31% to 87% at 5 years of follow-up in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. Most importantly, recent data show that the addition of a pure antiandrogen to an LHRH agonist in order to block the androgens made locally in the prostate leads to a 90% long-term control or probable cure of prostate cancer.     

Risk of hormone escape in a human prostate cancer model depends on therapy modalities and can be reduced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Almost all prostate cancers respond to androgen deprivation treatment but many recur. We postulated that risk of hormone escape -frequency and delay- are influenced by hormone therapy modalities. More, hormone therapies induce crucial biological changes involving androgen receptors; some might be targets for escape prevention. We investigated the relationship between the androgen deprivation treatment and the risk of recurrence using nude mice bearing the high grade, hormone-dependent human prostate cancer xenograft PAC120. Tumor-bearing mice were treated by Luteinizing-Hormone Releasing Hormone (LHRH) antagonist alone, continuous or intermittent regimen, or combined with androgen receptor (AR) antagonists (bicalutamide or flutamide). Tumor growth was monitored. Biological changes were studied as for genomic alterations, AR mutations and protein expression in a large series of recurrent tumors according to hormone therapy modalities. Therapies targeting Her-2 or AKT were tested in combination with castration. All statistical tests were two-sided. Tumor growth was inhibited by continuous administration of the LH-RH antagonist degarelix (castration), but 40% of tumors recurred. Intermittent castration or complete blockade induced by degarelix and antiandrogens combination, inhibited tumor growth but increased the risk of recurrence (RR) as compared to continuous castration (RR(intermittent): 14.5, RR(complete blockade): 6.5 and 1.35). All recurrent tumors displayed new quantitative genetic alterations and AR mutations, whatever the treatment modalities. AR amplification was found after complete blockade. Increased expression of Her-2/neu with frequent ERK/AKT activation was detected in all variants. Combination of castration with a Her-2/neu inhibitor decreased recurrence risk (0.17) and combination with an mTOR inhibitor prevented it. Anti-hormone treatments influence risk of recurrence although tumor growth inhibition was initially similar. Recurrent tumors displayed genetic instability, AR mutations, and alterations of phosphorylation pathways. We postulated that Her-2/AKT pathways allowed salvage of tumor cells under castration and we demonstrated that their inhibition prevented tumor recurrence in our model.     

Roles for the Backdoor Pathway of Androgen Metabolism in Prostate Cancer Response to Castration and Drug Treatment

Almost all men who present with advanced prostate cancer (CaP) and many men who fail potentially curative therapy are treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). ADT is not curative and CaP recurs as the lethal phenotype. The goal of this review is to describe the evolution of adrenal androgen blockade, how new androgen measurement methods have furthered understanding of androgen metabolism, and how further understanding of the backdoor pathway of androgen metabolism may lead to interventions that extend survival even more.     

Réflexion multidisciplinaire sur la prise en charge du Déficit androgénique lié à l’âge

The diagnosis of the androgen deficiency of the aging male (ADAM) is suspected in the presence of relatively unspecific clinical symptoms. The biological evidence of androgen deficiency should be given by using an assay taking into account the level of the sex hormone binding protein (SHBG), such as the bioavailable testosterone assay or, at least, the free testosterone index or the calculated free testosterone which both require measuring total testosterone and SHBG levels. Although the threshold value for defining ADAM has not been fully investigated, the lower limit of normal values in healthy young men which is commonly used for including subjects in therapeutic trials, seems appropriate. According to the currently available data, testosterone replacement therapy in hypogonadal aging men seems to be beneficial to quality of life, sexuality, metabolic status, body composition and osteoporosis. The initiation of androgen replacement therapy requires a careful screening for prostate cancer. Prostate and hematocrit must be monitored during the replacement therapy which is intended for maintaining testosterone levels in the physiological range. Associated disease should be accounted for as a possible factor worsening ADAM and could be relevant of a specific therapy.     

Flare Associated with LHRH-Agonist Therapy

The most common form of hormonal treatment for prostate cancer is luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-agonist therapy. During the first 1 to 3 weeks of LHRH-agonist therapy, an initial increase in testosterone is associated with a condition known as "flare." Blockade of flare can be accomplished with a number of agents, including flutamide, bicalutamide, nilutamide, diethylstilbestrol, ketoconazole, and cyproterone acetate. Evidence from the early use of LHRHagonists suggested that flare could be serious in nature, with an exacerbation of pain, increase in uremia, development of neurologic sequelae, and possibly death. These events have been uncommonly reported of late, most probably owing to the use of flare blockade in most patients with advanced disease, as well as the fact that many patients are currently being treated with much earlier disease. Evidence is conflicting as to whether flare makes a difference in less advanced disease. A few reports have noted complications during flare in patients in whom a blockade of flare was not required, including two deaths from one institution. Reported series, however, seem to suggest that with flare blockade, acute complications are extremely uncommon. Evidence suggests that 1) advanced disease should be blocked; 2) blockade should probably include an antiandrogen beginning about 1 week prior to administration of the LHRH-agonist; and 3) that patients without advanced disease but with very high PSA levels should be considered for flare blockade.     

Overexpression of aldo-keto reductase 1C3 (AKR1C3) in LNCaP cells diverts androgen metabolism towards testosterone resulting in resistance to the 5α-reductase inhibitor finasteride

Type 5 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (AKR1C3) is the major enzyme in the prostate that reduces 4-androstene-3,17-dione (Δ(4)-Adione) to the androgen receptor (AR) ligand testosterone. AKR1C3 is upregulated in prostate cancer (PCa) and castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) that develops after androgen deprivation therapy. PCa and CRPC often depend on intratumoral androgen biosynthesis and upregulation of AKR1C3 could contribute to intracellular synthesis of AR ligands and stimulation of proliferation through AR signaling. To test this hypothesis, we developed an LNCaP prostate cancer cell line overexpressing AKR1C3 (LNCaP-AKR1C3) and compared its metabolic and proliferative responses to Δ(4)-Adione treatment with that of the parental, AKR1C3 negative LNCaP cells. In LNCaP and LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells, metabolism proceeded via 5α-reduction to form 5α-androstane-3,17-dione and then (epi)androsterone-3-glucuronide. LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells made significantly higher amounts of testosterone-17β-glucuronide. When 5α-reductase was inhibited by finasteride, the production of testosterone-17β-glucuronide was further elevated in LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells. When AKR1C3 activity was inhibited with indomethacin the production of testosterone-17β-glucuronide was significantly decreased. Δ(4)-Adione treatment stimulated cell proliferation in both cell lines. Finasteride inhibited LNCaP cell proliferation, consistent with 5α-androstane-3,17-dione acting as the major metabolite that stimulates growth by binding to the mutated AR. However, LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells were resistant to the growth inhibitory properties of finasteride, consistent with the diversion of Δ(4)-Adione metabolism from 5α-reduced androgens to increased formation of testosterone. Indomethacin did not result in differences in Δ(4)-Adione induced proliferation since this treatment led to the same metabolic profile in LNCaP and LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells. We conclude that AKR1C3 overexpression diverts androgen metabolism to testosterone that results in proliferation in androgen sensitive prostate cancer. This effect is seen despite high levels of uridine glucuronosyl transferases suggesting that AKR1C3 activity can surmount the effects of this elimination pathway. Treatment options in prostate cancer that target 5α-reductase where AKR1C3 co-exists may be less effective due to the diversion of Δ(4)-Adione to testosterone.