New paradigms for advanced prostate cancer

In men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer, androgen blockade produces dramatic and rapid declines in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), bone pain, and urinary tract obstruction. Nevertheless, there have been limited options with at best palliative results for patients who progress despite a castrate testosterone level. This paradigm changed in 2004 with the publication of 2 randomized clinical trials that demonstrated a 20% to 24% survival benefit for docetaxel-based therapy when compared to mitoxantrone and prednisone, data that supported US Food and Drug Administration approval of docetaxel-based therapy for the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. This article reviews the preliminary data and the timing and sequencing implications of ongoing clinical trials. Studies are evaluating the combination of docetaxel with agents that target bone, tumor vasculature, and the vitamin D receptor as well as second-line agents, such as satraplatin. The role of immune therapy is also evolving, and further studies will define the optimal timing of chemotherapy with immune therapy.     

Docetaxel for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Chemotherapy has historically proven toxic and ineffective for the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), a disease with substantial morbidity and mortality. Progress has been made in symptom relief, and the combination of mitoxantrone and prednisone is considered the palliative standard of care. The effects of a variety of chemotherapeutic agents, both alone and in combination, on prostate-specific antigen decline rates, measurable disease response, and survival have been examined in numerous phase I and II trials. Results suggest that combining vinblastine or paclitaxel with estramustine confers a survival advantage over either agent alone. In addition, docetaxel-based therapy has been found to be effective and well tolerated, and phase III trials will soon determine whether docetaxel-based therapy should replace mitoxantrone-based therapy as the standard of care for HRPC.     

Current standard and investigational approaches to the management of hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is a common cause of death in men and remains incurable in the metastatic setting. In 2004, 2 landmark trials using docetaxel-based chemotherapy, TAX 327 and SWOG 99-16, showed a survival benefit for the first time in metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Current research suggests that several distinct mechanisms of androgen-refractory disease may converge in patients with disease progression on androgen deprivation therapy. These findings have identified several potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Current standard and investigational treatment options for this disease are discussed, including chemotherapy and rapidly evolving therapies in phase II/III trials involving antiangiogenic therapies, signal transduction inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and nuclear receptor targets. In light of a growing array of treatment options and an increasingly chronic natural history, this review supports a multidisciplinary care approach to these patients, including medical oncologists, urologists, and radiation oncologists, to optimize survival and quality of life.     

Clinical experience with gene therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer

Localized prostate cancer can be treated effectively with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. The treatment options for metastatic prostate cancer are limited to hormonal therapy; hormone-refractory cancer is treated with taxane-based chemotherapy, which provides only a modest survival benefit. New treatments are needed. The gene for the initiation of prostate cancer has not been identified; however, gene therapy can involve tumor injection of a gene to kill cells, systemic gene delivery to target and kill metastases, or local gene expression intended to generate a systemic response. This review will provide an overview of the various strategies of cancer gene therapy, focusing on those that have gone to clinical trial, detailing clinical experience in prostate cancer patients.     

Emerging pharmacologic therapies for prostate cancer

The last decade has seen explosive growth in the therapy of prostate cancer. Three areas of therapeutics are emerging: 1) new compounds with novel uses; 2) available compounds with new applications; and 3) new compounds applied to established indications. The novel compounds target specific receptor sites of cancer pathways and attack cancer cells with less effect on normal tissue. Earlyphase trials with compounds targeting the endothelin-A and EGF receptors have shown encouraging results in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. In addition, the Early Prostate Cancer Trial of over 8000 men is currently underway to determine the benefit of adjuvant androgen ablation with bicalutamide in men with localized prostate cancer. Early results show a significant 42% reduction in the progression of the disease in the bicalutamide treatment arm. Further, in large, phase 3 clinical trials in patients needing androgen ablation, the GnRH antagonist abarelix caused no testosterone surge and demonstrated a significantly more rapid decline in serum testosterone to the castrate level than did an LHRH agonist analogue. Abarelix should thus have application as a monotherapy in patients who need a rapid onset of action or are at high risk of complications from the clinical flare seen with LHRH agonists. Abarelix also uniquely caused a sustained decline in serum FSH levels, which have been shown in vitro to stimulate prostate cancer cell growth. If these favorable effects can be duplicated in patients, abarelix might also offer a survival benefit.     

Endocrine treatment of prostate cancer

Although androgen deprivation as a treatment for patients with prostate cancer was described more than 60 years ago its optimal use remains controversial. The widespread use of prostate-specific (PSA) assay has lead to earlier diagnosis and earlier detection of recurrent disease. This means that the systemic side effects of androgen deprivation and quality of life have become more important. Debates continue regarding the proper use and timing of endocrine therapy with orchiectomy, oestrogen agonists, gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, GnRH antagonists, and androgen antagonists. A critical review of the literature was performed. Data support that androgen deprivation is an effective treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer. However, although it improves survival, it is not curative, and creates a spectrum of unwanted effects that influence quality of life. Castration remains the frontline treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, where orchiectomy, oestrogen agonists and GnRH agonists produce equivalent clinical responses. Maximum androgen blockade (MAB) is not significantly more effective than single agent GnRH agonist or orchiectomy. Nonsteroidal antiandrogen monotherapy is as effective as castration in treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer offering quality of life benefits. Adjuvant endocrine treatment is able to delay disease progression at any stage. There is, however, controversy of the possible survival benefit of such treatment, including patients having PSA relapse after definitive local treatment for prostate cancer. Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment has its place mainly in the external beam radiotherapy setting. Intermittent androgen blockade is still considered experimental. The decision regarding the type of androgen deprivation should be made individually after informing the patient of all available treatment options, including watchful waiting, and on the basis of potential benefits and adverse effects. Several large studies are under way to investigate the role of adjuvant endocrine treatment in the field of early prostate cancer, intermittent androgen deprivation and endocrine therapy alone compared with endocrine therapy with radiotherapy. The real challenge, however, is to develop better means to avert hormone-refractory prostate cancer and better treatments for patients with hormone-refractory disease when it occurs.     

Protein kinase A type II-α regulatory subunit regulates the response of prostate cancer cells to taxane treatment

In the last decade taxane-based therapy has emerged as a standard of care for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Nevertheless, a significant fraction of tumors show no appreciable response to the treatment, while the others develop resistance and recur. Despite years of intense research, the mechanisms of taxane resistance in prostate cancer and other malignancies are poorly understood and remain a topic of intense investigation. We have used improved mutagenesis via random insertion of a strong promoter to search for events, which enable survival of prostate cancer cells after Taxol exposure. High-throughput mapping of the integration sites pointed to the PRKAR2A gene, which codes for a type II-α regulatory subunit of protein kinase A, as a candidate modulator of drug response. Both full-length and N-terminally truncated forms of the PRKAR2A gene product markedly increased survival of prostate cancer cells lines treated with Taxol and Taxotere. Suppression of protein kinase A enzymatic activity is the likely mechanism of action of the overexpressed proteins. Accordingly, protein kinase A inhibitor PKI (6–22) amide reduced toxicity of Taxol to prostate cancer cells. Our findings support the role of protein kinase A and its constituent proteins in cell response to chemotherapy.     

Innovative therapies for prostate cancer treatment

Androgen ablation is effective therapy for metastatic prostate cancer, but the majority of men eventually become refractory to this intervention. Cytotoxic chemotherapy offers palliation to symptomatic patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC); however, no chemotherapy regimen has yet been shown to prolong survival. There is a clear need for new agents and drug targets for the treatment of HRPC. A number of innovative therapeutic approaches that are rationally based and target driven are under investigation. This article reviews the development of antisense oligonucleotides that inhibit the anti-apoptotic bcL-2 protein. Approaches that target the epidermal growth factor receptor, the platelet derived growth factor receptor, and nuclear factor kappa-B are also discussed. There is much expectation that these therapies alone or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy will impact the clinical outcome of patients with HRPC.     

Treatment options for hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer is a disease that includes a variety of patients and represents a treatment dilemma for the practicing physician. Because of the diversity of this group, management strategies must be targeted to the clinical situations of the individual patients and their wishes. This article outlines a logical progression of treatment choices that currently exist in this rapidly evolving field, and the landmark chemotherapy trials involving docetaxel (SWOG 9916 and TAX 327) are reviewed. Although significant progress has been made in understanding and treating hormone-refractory prostate cancer, current treatments do not yet provide a cure, and important clinical trials continue to recruit patients.     

Alterations of androgen receptor in prostate cancer

The significance of androgens in the development of prostate cancer has been known for more than half century. During the last decade, a lot of effort has been put to study the significance of the specific nuclear receptor of the hormone, androgen receptor (AR). It has been suggested that polymorphisms, especially the length of CAG repeat in exon 1 of the gene, are associated with the risk of prostate cancer. However, not all studies have confirmed the association. Most surprisingly, it has now become clear that prostate carcinomas emerging during the androgen withdrawal therapy (i.e. hormone-refractory tumors) are capable of reactivating the AR-mediated signalling despite of the low levels of androgens. In addition, it has been shown that AR gene itself is genetically targeted. One-third of the hormone-refractory prostate carcinomas contains amplification of the gene. In addition, 10-30% of prostate carcinomas treated by antiandrogens acquire point mutation in the AR gene. The genetic alterations in AR indicate that receptor should be considered as putative treatment target. Evidently, the currently available antiandrogens are not capable to abolish the AR-mediated signalling efficiently enough.     

CIL-102 interacts with microtubule polymerization and causes mitotic arrest following apoptosis in the human prostate cancer PC-3 cell line

There have been no therapeutic agents that provide a survival advantage in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration approved docetaxel combined with prednisone for the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer, and it does show a survival benefit. Hence, anti-microtubule drugs might be of benefit in chemotherapy of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. We used metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer PC-3 cells to investigate potential molecular mechanisms for CIL-102, a semisynthetic alkaloid derivative. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenylte-trazolium bromide and sulforhodamine B assays indicated that CIL-102 inhibits cell growth dose-dependently. Immunofluorescence microscopy and in vitro tubulin assembly assays indicated that CIL-102 binds to tubulin and disrupts microtubule organization. Flow cytometry showed that CIL-102 causes cells to accumulate in G(2)/M phase and sub-G(0)/G(1) phase. CIL-102-induced apoptosis was also characterized by immunofluorescence microscopy. Western blotting and kinase assays showed that CIL-102 exposure induced up-regulation of cyclin B1 and p34(cdc2) kinase activity and olomoucine, a p34(cdc2) inhibitor, profoundly reduced the number of cells accumulated in mitotic phase. Moreover, Bcl-2 phosphorylation, Cdc25C phosphorylation, and survivin expression were increased. CIL-102-induced apoptosis was associated with activation of caspase-3, but a noncaspase pathway may also be involved, since benzyloxycarbonyl-VAD-fluoromethyl ketone, a pancaspase inhibitor, only partially inhibited the apoptosis, and apoptosis-inducing factor was translocated from mitochondria to cytosol. We conclude that CIL-102 induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis by binding to tubulin and inhibiting tubulin polymerization. CIL-102 causes mitotic arrest, at least partly, by modulating cyclin-dependent kinases and then apoptosis executed by caspase and noncaspase pathways.     

A natural BH3 mimetic induces autophagy in apoptosis-resistant prostate cancer via modulating Bcl-2–Beclin1 interaction at endoplasmic reticulum

A natural BH3-mimetic, small-molecule inhibitor of Bcl-2, (−)-gossypol, shows promise in ongoing phase II and III clinical trials for human prostate cancer. In this study we show that (−)-gossypol preferentially induces autophagy in androgen-independent (AI) prostate cancer cells that have high levels of Bcl-2 and are resistant to apoptosis, both in vitro and in vivo, but not in androgen-dependent (AD) cells with low Bcl-2 and sensitive to apoptosis. The Bcl-2 inhibitor induces autophagy through blocking Bcl-2–Beclin1 interaction, together with downregulating Bcl-2, upregulating Beclin1, and activating the autophagic pathway. The (−)-gossypol-induced autophagy is dependent on Beclin1 and Atg5. Our results show for the first time that (−)-gossypol can also interrupt the interactions between Beclin1 and Bcl-2/Bcl-xL at endoplasmic reticulum, thus releasing the BH3-only pro-autophagic protein Beclin1, which in turn triggers the autophagic cascade. Oral administration of (−)-gossypol significantly inhibited the growth of AI prostate cancer xenografts, representing a promising new regimen for the treatment of human hormone-refractory prostate cancer with Bcl-2 overexpression. Our data provide new insights into the mode of cell death induced by Bcl-2 inhibitors, which will facilitate the rational design of clinical trials by selecting patients who are most likely to benefit from the Bcl-2-targeted molecular therapy.     

Functional domain and motif analyses of androgen receptor coregulator ARA70 and its differential expression in prostate cancer

Androgen receptor (AR)-associated coregulator 70 (ARA70) was the first identified AR coregulator. However, its molecular mechanism and biological relevance to prostate cancer remain unclear. Here we show that ARA70 interacts with and promotes AR activity via the consensus FXXLF motif within the ARA70-N2 domain (amino acids 176-401). However, it does not promote AR activity via the classic LXXLL motif located at amino acids 92-96, although this classic LXXLL motif is important for ARA70 to interact with other receptors, such as PPARgamma. The molecular mechanisms by which ARA70 enhances AR transactivation involve the increase of AR expression, protein stability, and nuclear translocation. Furthermore, ARA70 protein is more frequently detected in prostate cancer specimens (91.74%) than in benign tissues (64.64%, p < 0.0001). ARA70 expression is also increased in high-grade prostate cancer tissues as well as the hormone-refractory LNCaP xenografts and prostate cancer cell lines. Because ARA70 can promote the antiandrogen hydroxyflutamide (HF)-enhanced AR transactivation, the increased ARA70 expression in hormone-refractory prostate tumors may confer the development of HF withdrawal syndrome, commonly diagnosed in patients with the later stages of prostate cancer. Because ARA70-N2 containing the AR-interacting FXXLF motif without coactivation function can suppress HF-enhanced AR transactivation in the hormone-refractory LNCaP cells, using the ARA70-N2 inhibitory peptide at the hormone refractory stage to battle the HF withdrawal syndrome may become an alternative strategy to treat prostate cancer.     

Epigenetic regulation of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is a commonly diagnosed cancer in men and a leading cause of cancer deaths. Whilst the underlying mechanisms leading to prostate cancer are still to be determined, it is evident that both genetic and epigenetic changes contribute to the development and progression of this disease. Epigenetic changes involving DNA hypo- and hypermethylation, altered histone modifications and more recently changes in microRNA expression have been detected at a range of genes associated with prostate cancer. Furthermore, there is evidence that particular epigenetic changes are associated with different stages of the disease. Whilst early detection can lead to effective treatment, and androgen deprivation therapy has a high response rate, many tumours develop towards hormone-refractory prostate cancer, for which there is no successful treatment. Reliable markers for early detection and more effective treatment strategies are, therefore, needed. Consequently, there is a considerable interest in the potential of epigenetic changes as markers or targets for therapy in prostate cancer. Epigenetic modifiers that demethylate DNA and inhibit histone deacetylases have recently been explored to reactivate silenced gene expression in cancer. However, further understanding of the mechanisms and the effects of chromatin modulation in prostate cancer are required. In this review, we examine the current literature on epigenetic changes associated with prostate cancer and discuss the potential use of epigenetic modifiers for treatment of this disease.     

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer in the Lobund-Wistar rat

Research on cancer prevention and therapy must focus on the refractory disease, the fatal end-stage of cancer that develops in patients with organ-related solid tumors. Refractory cancers develop spontaneously in advanced-stage tumors or in relapsed cases after failed therapy. Because neither prevention nor therapy is currently feasible, refractory cancer is a major impediment to survival. There is a great need for an animal model of prostate cancer (PC), one that develops cancer from initial premalignant to the terminal refractory stages. We describe here a model of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) that develops spontaneously through two stages by endogenous mechanisms in the Lobund-Wistar (LW) rat. The early premalignant, testosterone (T)-dependent stage is promoted by high levels of endogenous T, and up to age 12 months is reversible by T deprivation; without this intervention, the tumorigenic process progresses to the refractory stage, which is highly aggressive and does not respond to T deprivation or to a wide range of therapies. Initial refractory tumors are palpable at approximately 18 months of age. As they continue to grow, the tumors express characteristics seen in refractory cancers in humans (i.e., hypoxia, expression of hypoxia-inducible factors, and metastasis). Chemically induced HRPCs in LW rats manifest the same two developmental stages, but with shorter latency periods. A transplantable, metastasizing cell line (PAIII) was derived from a germfree LW rat with advanced-stage cancer. Both spontaneous and chemically induced autochthonous HRPC model systems serve as outstanding models for studies on the prevention and therapy of refractory cancer.     

Hormonal therapy combined with radiotherapy in locally advanced prostate cancer

At present radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy are considered to be the treatment of choice for clinical T1-T2 prostate cancer. In a more advanced stage of the disease (T3) 10-year overall survival is observed in approximately 40% of patients treated with conventional radiotherapy. So far only a few methods for improving the efficacy of radiotherapy have been introduced. One of them is a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with 3 dimensional treatment planning. These novel methods make it possible to escalate the dose to the target and protect healthy tissue at the same time. The optimal volume of irradiation, total dose, fraction dose, techniques of radiotherapy, and the end points used during the follow-up are open to debate. In recent years a few clinical trials involving hormonal therapy and radiotherapy have been carried out. The most important of these are: RTOG 8307, RTOG 8610, RTOG 9202, and EORTC 22863.In the RTOG 8307 trial the comparison of outcomes of a combined treatment with a matched-control group of patients treated by radiotherapy alone has shown that adding hormonal therapy to radiotherapy resulted in a better outcome. Another trials RTOG 8531 and RTOG 8610 produced benefit due to the implementation of hormonal therapy in radiotherapy. The EORTC trial No. 22863 showed improvement in the 5-year overall survival when hormonal therapy after the completion of radiotherapy was continued for 3 years in the investigational arm. The RTOG 9202 study indicated benefit obtained from 2 years of adjuvant hormonal therapy.The results of these trials have had a substantial impact on the management of locally advanced prostate cancer, but there are still questions that have to be answered. There is no doubt that hormonal therapy is an important component of the management of locally advanced prostate cancer. Still the optimal combination of drugs and the timing of such treatment remains controversial. Considering the potential side effects of a combined treatment on the quality of life of patients and care costs, additional properly designed randomised trials are needed to identify the subgroup of patients who will obtain the greatest benefit. Currently, it can be concluded that in the group of patients with a high risk of relapse by adding hormonal therapy to radiotherapy the outcome of treatment in patients with prostate cancer has improved.     

A mechanism for hormone-independent prostate cancer through modulation of androgen receptor signaling by the HER-2/neu tyrosine kinase

Prostate cancer progresses from a hormone-sensitive, androgen-dependent stage to a hormone-refractory, androgen-independent tumor. The androgen receptor pathway functions in these androgen-independent tumors despite anti-androgen therapy. In our LAPC-4 prostate cancer model, androgen-independent sublines expressed higher levels of the HER-2/neu receptor tyrosine kinase than their androgen-dependent counterparts. Forced overexpression of HER-2/neu in androgen-dependent prostate cancer cells allowed ligand-independent growth. HER-2/neu activated the androgen receptor pathway in the absence of ligand and synergized with low levels of androgen to 'superactivate' the pathway. By modulating the response to low doses of androgen, a tyrosine kinase receptor can restore androgen receptor function to prostate cancer cells, a finding directly related to the clinical progression of prostate cancer.     

Emergence of metastatic hormone-refractory disease in prostate cancer after anti-androgen therapy

The anti-androgens used in prostate cancer therapy have been designed to interfere with the normal androgen receptor (AR)-mediated processes that ensure prostate cell survival, triggering tumor cells to undergo programmed cell death. While anti-androgens were originally designed to treat advanced disease, they have recently been used to debulk organ-confined prostate tumors, to improve positive margins prior to surgery, and for chemoprevention in patients at high risk for prostate cancer. However, tumors treated with anti-androgens frequently become hormone refractory and acquire a more aggressive phenotype. Progression toward metastatic hormone-refractory disease has often been regarded as the outgrowth of a small number of hormone-independent cells that emerge from a hormone-dependent tumor during anti-androgen treatment by natural selection. While a number of selective advantages have recently been identified, there is also considerable evidence suggesting that the progression toward metastatic hormone-refractory disease is an dynamic process which involves abrogation of programmed cell death as a result of the attenuation of DNA fragmentation and maintenance of mitochondrial membrane potential in tumor cells; the upregulation of stromal-mediated growth factor signaling pathways; and the upregulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) protease expression.     

TACC2 is an androgen-responsive cell cycle regulator promoting androgen-mediated and castration-resistant growth of prostate cancer

Despite the existence of effective antiandrogen therapy for prostate cancer, the disease often progresses to castration-resistant states. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying the resistance for androgen deprivation in terms of the androgen receptor (AR)-regulated pathways is a requisite to manage castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Using a ChIP-cloning strategy, we identified functional AR binding sites (ARBS) in the genome of prostate cancer cells. We discovered that a centrosome- and microtubule-interacting gene, transforming acidic coiled-coil protein 2 (TACC2), is a novel androgen-regulated gene. We identified a functional AR-binding site (ARBS) including two canonical androgen response elements in the vicinity of TACC2 gene, in which activated hallmarks of histone modification were observed. Androgen-dependent TACC2 induction is regulated by AR, as confirmed by AR knockdown or its pharmacological inhibitor bicalutamide. Using long-term androgen-deprived cells as cellular models of CRPC, we demonstrated that TACC2 is highly expressed and contributes to hormone-refractory proliferation, as small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of TACC2 reduced cell growth and cell cycle progression. By contrast, in TACC2-overexpressing cells, an acceleration of the cell cycle was observed. In vivo tumor formation study of prostate cancer in castrated immunocompromised mice revealed that TACC2 is a tumor-promoting factor. Notably, the clinical significance of TACC2 was demonstrated by a correlation between high TACC2 expression and poor survival rates. Taken together with the critical roles of TACC2 in the cell cycle and the biology of prostate cancer, we infer that the molecule is a potential therapeutic target in CRPC as well as hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.     

Prostate cancer gene therapy-what have we learned and where are we going?

With recent advances in genetic engineering, tumor biology, and immunology, gene therapy has been recognized as a promising new treatment option for various cancers, including prostate cancer. Several clinical trials of prostate cancer gene therapy, using therapeutic genes which include suicide genes, immunomodulatory genes, tumor suppressor genes, and anti-oncogenes, are under way and preliminary reports have emerged. Although gene therapy for prostate cancer is still at an early stage and requires additional technological breakthroughs, new insights obtained from recent clinical trials indicate a promising potential for prostate cancer gene therapy. In this report, general concepts, current progress, and future prospects in prostate cancer gene therapy are summarized.