Palmilycorine and lycoriside: acyloxy and acylglucosyloxy alkaloids from crinum asiaticum

Two new types of alkaloidal conjugates, a C₁₆-acyloxy derivative, named palmilycorine, and an acylglucosyloxy derivative, named lycoriside, were isolated from the fruits of Crinum asiaticum. The presence of these compounds was also detected in the fleshy scale leaves and in roots of this species. The structures of the two compounds were established as 1-O-palmitoyllycorine (1) and lycorine-1-O-(6′-O-palmitoyl-β-D-glucopyranoside)(2), respectively, on the basis of chemical transformation and comprehensive spectral evidence. The biological effects of the alkaloids were evaluated.     

Four 6-hydroxylated alkaloids in the crinine series from Crinum augustum

The structures of five alkaloids present in Crinum augustum were elucidated by spectral arguments. Four of them were shown to be new and constitute two pairs of epimers: 6-α- and 6-β-hydroxybuphanisine and 6-α- and 6-β-hydroxycrinine. The fifth alkaloid was identified as crinamine.     

Two new diterpene-based alkaloids from Icacina guesfeldtii

From Icacina guesfeldtii (leaves and roots), two new diterpene-based alkaloids have been isolated and identified as icaceine (2) and De-N-methylicaceine (3). Icacine (1) occurred both in the leaves and roots. Structure determination was performed by spectroscopic and chemical methods. As icacine (1), these two bases are the first alkaloids with a pimarane skeleton isolated from plants.     

New alkaloids from Tabernaemontana divaricata

A re-investigation of the root bark of Tabernaemontana divaricata resulted in the isolation of 18 compounds, viz. α-amyrin acetate, lupeol acetate, α-amyrin, lupeol, cycloartenol, β-sitosterol, campesterol, benzoic acid, aurantiamide acetate, coronaridine, coronaridine hydroxyindolenine (1), ibogamine, 5-hydroxy-6-oxocoronaridine (6), 5-oxocoronaridine (9), 6-oxocoronaridine (10), (±)-19-hydroxycoronaridine (11), 3-oxocoronaridine (12) and voacamine. The alkaloids 6, 9, 10 and 11 are new compounds, whereas cycloartenol, campesterol, ibogamine, benzoic acid, aurantiamide acetate and coronaridine hydroxyindolenine are reported from this plant for the first time.     

Why do fast- and slow-growing grass species differ so little in their rate of root respiration,considering the large differences in rate of growth and ion uptake?

Herbaceous plants grown with free access to nutrients exhibit inherent differences in maximum relative growth rate (RGR) and rate of nutrient uptake. Measured rates of root respiration are higher in fast-growing species than in slow-growing ones. Fast-growing herbaceous species, however, exhibit lower rates of respiration than would be expected from their high rates of growth and nitrate uptake. We investigated why the difference in root O₂ uptake between fast- and slow-growing species is relatively small. Inhibition of respiration by the build-up of CO₂ in closed cuvettes, diurnal variation in respiration rates or an increasing ratio of respiratory CO₂ release to O₂ uptake (RQ) with increasing RGR failed to explain the relatively low root respiration rates in fast-growing grasses. Furthermore, differences in alternative pathway activity can at most only partly explain why the difference in root respiration between fast- and slow-growing grasses is relatively small. Although specific respiratory costs for maintenance of biomass are slightly higher in the fast-growing Dactylis glomerata L. than those in the slow-growing Festuca ovina L., they account for 50% of total root respiration in both species. The specific respiratory costs for ion uptake in the fast-growing grass are one-third of those in the slow-growing grass [0·41 versus 1·22 mol O₂ mol (NO₃^–)^–1]. We conclude that this is the major cause of the relatively low rates of root respiration in fast-growing grasses.