Phosphorylation of the Gq/11-coupled m3-muscarinic receptor is involved in receptor activation of the ERK-1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway

We investigated the role played by agonist-mediated phosphorylation of the G(q/11)-coupled M(3)-muscarinic receptor in the mechanism of activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, ERK-1/2, in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. A mutant of the M(3)-muscarinic receptor, where residues Lys(370)-Ser(425) of the third intracellular loop had been deleted, showed a reduced ability to activate the ERK-1/2 pathway. This reduction was evident despite the fact that the receptor was able to couple efficiently to the phospholipase C second messenger pathway. Importantly, the ERK-1/2 responses to both the wild-type M(3)-muscarinic receptor and DeltaLys(370)-Ser(425) receptor mutant were dependent on the activity of protein kinase C. Our results, therefore, indicate the existence of two mechanistic components to the ERK-1/2 response, which appear to act in concert. First, the activation of protein kinase C through the diacylglycerol arm of the phospholipase C signaling pathway and a second component, absent in the DeltaLys(370)-Ser(425) receptor mutant, that is independent of the phospholipase C signaling pathway. The reduced ability of the DeltaLys(370)-Ser(425) receptor mutant to activate the ERK-1/2 pathway correlated with an approximately 80% decrease in the ability of the receptor to undergo agonist-mediated phosphorylation. Furthermore, we have previously shown that M(3)-muscarinic receptor phosphorylation can be inhibited by a dominant negative mutant of casein kinase 1alpha and by expression of a peptide corresponding to the third intracellular loop of the M(3)-muscarinic receptor. Expression of these inhibitors of receptor phosphorylation reduced the wild-type M(3)-muscarinic receptor ERK-1/2 response. We conclude that phosphorylation of the M(3)-muscarinic receptor on sites in the third intracellular loop by casein kinase 1alpha contributes to the mechanism of receptor activation of ERK-1/2 by working in concert with the diacylglycerol/PKC arm of the phospholipase C signaling pathway.     

Structure-function analysis of muscarinic receptors and their associated G proteins

Each member of the muscarinic receptor family (M1-M5) can interact only with a limited subset of the many structurally closely related heterotrimeric G proteins expressed within a cell. To understand how this selectivity is achieved at a molecular level, we have used the G(i/0)-coupled M2 and the Gq/11-coupled M3 muscarinic receptors as model systems. We developed a genetic strategy involving the coexpression of wild type or mutant muscarinic receptors with hybrid or mutant G protein alpha subunits to identify specific, functionally relevant receptor/G protein contact sites. This approach led to the identification of N- and C-terminal amino acids on alpha(q) and alpha(i) that are critical for maintaining proper receptor/G protein coupling. Moreover, several receptor sites were identified that are likely to be contacted by these functionally critical G alpha residues. To gain deeper insight into muscarinic receptor structure, we recently developed a cysteine disulfide cross-linking strategy, using the M3 muscarinic receptor as a model system. Among other structural modifications, this approach involves the removal of most native cysteine residues by site-directed mutagenesis, the insertion of three factor Xa cleavage sites into the third intracellular loop, and systematic 'reintroduction' of pairs of cysteine residues. Following treatment of receptor-containing membrane preparations with factor Xa and oxidizing agents, disulfide cross-linked products can be identified by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting studies. This approach should greatly advance our knowledge of the molecular architecture of muscarinic and other G protein-coupled receptors.     

Differential G-protein-coupled receptor phosphorylation provides evidence for a signaling bar code

G-protein-coupled receptors are hyper-phosphorylated in a process that controls receptor coupling to downstream signaling pathways. The pattern of receptor phosphorylation has been proposed to generate a "bar code" that can be varied in a tissue-specific manner to direct physiologically relevant receptor signaling. If such a mechanism existed, receptors would be expected to be phosphorylated in a cell/tissue-specific manner. Using tryptic phosphopeptide maps, mass spectrometry, and phospho-specific antibodies, it was determined here that the prototypical G(q/11)-coupled M(3)-muscarinic receptor was indeed differentially phosphorylated in various cell and tissue types supporting a role for differential receptor phosphorylation in directing tissue-specific signaling. Furthermore, the phosphorylation profile of the M(3)-muscarinic receptor was also dependent on the stimulus. Full and partial agonists to the M(3)-muscarinic receptor were observed to direct phosphorylation preferentially to specific sites. This hitherto unappreciated property of ligands raises the possibility that one mechanism underlying ligand bias/functional selectivity, a process where ligands direct receptors to preferred signaling pathways, may be centered on the capacity of ligands to promote receptor phosphorylation at specific sites.     

Activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by a Gq/11-coupled muscarinic receptor is independent of receptor internalization

A number of recent studies have demonstrated an essential role for receptor endocytosis in the activation of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, Erk-1 and Erk-2 (extracellular activated protein kinases 1 and 2), by growth factor receptors and the G-protein coupled beta2-adrenergic receptor. Because ligand-mediated receptor endocytosis and activation of the MAP kinase pathway are common phenomena among G-protein coupled receptors, it has been suggested that the essential role of endocytosis in MAP kinase activation identified for the beta2-adrenergic receptor may be universal for all G-protein coupled receptors (Daaka,Y., Luttrell, L. M., Ahn, S., Della Rocca, G. J., Ferguson, S. S. G., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 685-688). We tested this hypothesis using the Gq/11-coupled m3-muscarinic receptor expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and an m3-muscarinic receptor mutant that does not undergo endocytosis. We demonstrate that inhibition of endocytosis by concanavalin A and cytochalasin D does not affect the ability of the wild type m3-muscarinic receptor to activate Erk-1/2. Furthermore, the mutant m3-muscarinic receptor that is unable to undergo endocytosis, activates the MAP kinase pathway in an identical manner to the wild type receptor. We conclude that receptor endocytosis is not universally essential for MAP kinase activation by G-protein coupled receptors. We discuss the possibility that the differential roles played by endocytosis in MAP kinase activation between various receptor subtypes may be linked to the mechanism of upstream activation of Raf-1.     

Receptor-Galpha fusion proteins as a tool for ligand screening

We have prepared fusion proteins of muscarinic M1-M5 receptors with alpha subunits of G proteins Gi1, Gi2, Gs, G11, G16 and chimera of G protein alpha subunits using the bacurovirus-Sf9 expression system. In fusion proteins such as M2-Gi1alpha and M4-Gi1alpha, agonist caused the decrease in the apparent affinity for GDP of these fusion proteins and then the increase in [35S]GTPgammaS binding in the presence of GDP. Thus we could use the membrane preparation expressing these fusion proteins as a tool to screen agonists and antagonists. On the other hand, the effect of agonists to decrease the apparent affinity for GDP was not clearly observed in fusion proteins of Gq/G11-coupled receptors such as M1-G11alpha, M3-G11alpha, and M5-G11alpha. The effect of agonists could be observed for fusion proteins with G16alpha of muscarinic M1, M2 and adrenergic beta2 receptors, but the extent of the effect was much less than that for fusion proteins with Gi1alpha of Gi/Go-coupled receptors. Fusion proteins of M1 receptors with Gi1alpha or chimera of G16alpha and Gi2alpha were also not effective in detecting the action of agonists.     

Reconstitution of agonist-stimulated phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate hydrolysis using purified m1 muscarinic receptor, Gq/11, and phospholipase C-beta 1.

We describe the reconstitution using purified proteins of the m1 muscarinic cholinergic pathway that activates phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-specific phospholipase C via the G protein Gq/11. Recombinant m1 muscarinic receptor was co-reconstituted in lipid vesicles with either hepatic Gq/11 or with cerebral alpha q/11 and beta gamma subunits. The rate of [35S]GTP gamma S binding to the reconstituted vesicles was stimulated 20-50-fold by agonist. Maximal receptor-catalyzed binding was 7 mol of GTP gamma S bound per mol of receptor. The m2 muscarinic receptor was a poor activator of Gq/11. The binding of [alpha-32P]GTP to [gamma-32P]GTP to m1/Gq/11 vesicles indicated that the receptor could maintain up to 40% of the total coupled Gq/11 in the GTP bound state. The rate of hydrolysis of bound GTP, 0.8 min-1, is consistent with the rate predicted from the GTP binding data but is 3-5-fold lower than rates reported for other trimeric G proteins. Agonist-stimulated photo-affinity labeling with gamma-(4-azidoanilido)-[alpha-32P]GTP indicated that the receptor catalyzed binding to both alpha q and alpha 11 with about equal efficiency. Receptor-catalyzed activation of Gq/11 by GTP gamma S, measured as the ability to activate purified phospholipase C-beta 1, paralleled receptor-catalyzed [35S]GTP gamma S binding. Co-reconstitution of receptor, Gq/11, and phospholipase C-beta 1 restored GTP gamma S-dependent carbachol-stimulated hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. The m1 receptor, Gq/11, and phospholipase C-beta 1 are thus sufficient to initiate the hormonal inositol trisphosphate/diacylglycerol signaling pathway without additional proteins.     

Differential involvement of Galpha12 and Galpha13 in receptor-mediated stress fiber formation.

The ubiquitously expressed heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) G12 and G13 have been shown to activate the small GTPase Rho. Rho stimulation leads to a rapid remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton and subsequent stress fiber formation. We investigated the involvement of G12 or G13 in stress fiber formation induced through a variety of Gq/G11-coupled receptors. Using fibroblast cell lines derived from wild-type and Galphaq/Galpha11-deficient mice, we show that agonist-dependent activation of the endogenous receptors for thrombin or lysophosphatidic acid and of the heterologously expressed bradykinin B2, vasopressin V1A, endothelin ETA, and serotonin 5-HT2C receptors induced stress fiber formation in either the presence or absence of Galphaq/Galpha11. Stress fiber assembly induced through the muscarinic M1 and the metabotropic glutamate subtype 1alpha receptors was dependent on Gq/G11 proteins. The activation of the Gq/G11-coupled endothelin ETB and angiotensin AT1A receptors failed to induce stress fiber formation. Lysophosphatidic acid, B2, and 5-HT2C receptor-mediated stress fiber formation was dependent on Galpha13 and involved epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors, whereas thrombin, ETA, and V1A receptors induced stress fiber accumulation via Galpha12 in an EGF receptor-independent manner. Our data demonstrate that many Gq/G11-coupled receptors induce stress fiber assembly in the absence of Galphaq and Galpha11 and that this involves either a Galpha12 or a Galpha13/EGF receptor-mediated pathway.     

Calcium signaling and synaptic modulation: regulation of endocannabinoid-mediated synaptic modulation by calcium

Postsynaptic Ca2+ signal influences synaptic transmission through multiple mechanisms. Some of them involve retrograde messengers that are released from postsynaptic neurons in a Ca2+-dependent manner and modulate transmitter release through activation of presynaptic receptors. Recent studies have revealed essential roles of endocannabinoids in retrograde modulation of synaptic transmission. Endocannabinoid release is induced by either postsynaptic Ca2+ elevation alone or activation of postsynaptic Gq/11-coupled receptors with or without Ca2+ elevation. The former pathway is independent of phospholipase Cbeta (PLCbeta) and requires a large Ca2+ elevation to a micromolar range. The latter pathway requires PLCbeta and is facilitated by a moderate Ca2+ elevation to a submicromolar range. This facilitation is caused by Ca2+-dependency of receptor-driven PLCbeta activation. The released endocannabinoids then activate presynaptic cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1), and suppress transmitter release from presynaptic terminals. Both CB1 receptors and Gq/11-coupled receptors are widely distributed in the brain. Thus, the endocannabinoid-mediated retrograde modulation may be an important and widespread mechanism in the brain, by which postsynaptic events including Gq/11-coupled receptor activation and Ca2+ elevation can retrogradely influence presynaptic function.     

Reconstitution reveals additional roles for N- and C-terminal domains of g(alpha) in muscarinic receptor coupling

The molecular basis for selectivity of M1 and M2 muscarinic receptor coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins has been studied using receptors expressed in Sf9 cell membranes and reconstituted with purified chimeric G(alpha) subunits containing different regions of Gi1alpha and Gq(alpha). The abilities of G protein heterotrimers containing chimeric alpha subunits to stabilize the high-affinity state of the receptors for agonist and to undergo receptor stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange was compared with G protein heterotrimers containing either native Gi1alpha or Gq(alpha). The data confirm the importance of the proper context of the C-terminus of Galpha by demonstrating that the C-terminus of Gi1alpha, when placed in the context of Gq(alpha), prevents coupling to muscarinic M1 receptors, while the C-terminus of Gq(alpha), when placed in the context of Gi1alpha, prevents coupling to muscarinic M2 receptors. However, C-terminal amino acids of Gq(alpha) placed in the context of Gi1alpha were not sufficient to allow M1 receptor coupling, nor were C-terminal amino acids of Gi1alpha placed in the context of Gq(alpha) sufficient for M2 receptor coupling. The unique six amino acid N-terminal extension of Gq(alpha) when added to the N-terminus of Gi1alpha neither prevented M2 receptor coupling nor permitted M1 receptor coupling. A Gi1alpha-based chimera containing both N- and C-terminal regions of Gq(alpha) gained the ability to productively couple M1 receptors suggesting that the proper context of both N- and C-termini is required for muscarinic receptor coupling.     

Activation of the endothelin receptor inhibits the G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel by a phospholipase A2-mediated mechanism

To develop a malleable system to model the well-described, physiological interactions between Gq/11 - coupled receptor and Gi/o-coupled receptor signaling, we coexpressed the endothelin A receptor, the mu-opioid receptor, and the G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir 3) heteromultimers in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Activation of the Gi/o-coupled mu-opioid receptor strongly increased Kir 3 channel current, whereas activation of the Gq/11-coupled endothelin A receptor inhibited the Kir 3 response evoked by mu-opioid receptor activation. The magnitude of the inhibition of Kir 3 was channel subtype specific; heteromultimers composed of Kir 3.1 and Kir 3.2 or Kir 3.1 and Kir 3.4 were significantly more sensitive to the effects of endothelin-1 than heteromultimers composed of Kir 3.1 and Kir 3.5. The difference in sensitivity of the heteromultimers suggests that the endothelin-induced inhibition of the opioid- activated current was caused by an effect at the channel rather than at the opioid receptor. The endothelin-1-mediated inhibition was mimicked by arachidonic acid and blocked by the phospholipase A2 inhibitor arachidonoyl trifluoromethyl ketone. Consistent with a possible phospholipase A2-mediated mechanism, the endothelin-1 effect was blocked by calcium chelation with BAPTA-AM and was not affected by kinase inhibition by either staurosporine or genistein. The data suggest the hypothesis that Gq/11-coupled receptor activation may interfere with Gi/o-coupled receptor signaling by the activation of phospholipase A2 and subsequent inhibition of effector function by a direct effect of an eicosanoid on the channel.     

P2Y2 purinergic and M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors activate different phospholipase C-beta isoforms that are uniquely susceptible to protein kinase C-dependent phosphorylation and inactivation

Activation of phospholipase C-beta (PLC-beta) by G protein-coupled receptors typically results in rapid but transient second messenger generation. Although PLC-beta deactivation may contribute to the transient nature of this response, the mechanisms governing PLC-beta deactivation are poorly characterized. We investigated the involvement of protein kinase C (PKC) in the termination of PLC-beta activation induced by endogenous P2Y(2) purinergic receptors and transfected M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Activation of P2Y(2) receptors causes Galpha(q/11) to associate with PLC-beta3, whereas M(3) mAChR activation causes Galpha(q/11) to associate with both PLC-beta1 and PLC-beta3 in these cells. Phosphorylation of PLC-beta3, but not PLC-beta1, is induced by activating either P2Y(2) receptors or M(3) mAChR. We demonstrate that PKC rather than protein kinase A mediates the G protein-coupled receptor-induced phosphorylation of PLC-beta3. The PKC-mediated phosphorylation of PLC-beta3 diminishes the interaction of Galpha(q/11) with PLC-beta3, thereby contributing to the termination PLC-beta3 activity. These findings indicate that the distinct temporal profiles of PLC activation by P2Y(2) receptors and mAChR may arise from the differential activation of PLC-beta1 and PLC-beta3 by the receptors, coupled with a selective PKC-mediated negative feedback mechanism that targets PLC-beta3 but not PLC-beta1.     

Phospholipase C-beta 1 is a GTPase-activating protein for Gq/11, its physiologic regulator.

Purified M1 muscarinic cholinergic receptor and Gq/11 were coreconstituted in lipid vesicles. Addition of purified phospholipase C-beta 1 (PLC-beta 1) further stimulated the receptor-promoted steady-state GTPase activity of Gq/11 up to 20-fold. Stimulation depended upon receptor-mediated GTP-GDP exchange. Addition of PLC-beta 1 caused a rapid burst of hydrolysis of Gq/11-bound GTP that was at least 50-fold faster than in its absence. Thus, PLC-beta 1 stimulates hydrolysis of Gq/11-bound GTP and acts as a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for its physiologic regulator, Gq/11. GTPase-stimulating activity was specific both for PLC-beta 1 and Gq/11. Such GAP activity by an effector coupled to a trimeric G protein can reconcile slow GTP hydrolysis by pure G proteins in vitro with fast physiologic deactivation of G protein-mediated signaling.     

Differential regulation of mTOR-dependent S6 phosphorylation by muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes

Muscarinic receptors subserve many functions in both peripheral and central nervous systems. Some of these processes depend on increases in protein synthesis, which may be achieved by activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a kinase that regulates protein translation capacity. Here, we examined the regulation of mTOR-dependent signaling pathways by muscarinic receptors in SK-N-SH human neuroblastoma cells, and in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cell lines transfected with individual muscarinic receptor subtypes. In SK-N-SH cells, the acetylcholine analog carbachol stimulated phosphorylation of the ribosomal S6 protein, a downstream target of mTOR. The sensitivity of the response to subtype-selective muscarinic receptor antagonists indicated that it was mediated by M3 receptors. Carbachol-evoked S6 phosphorylation was blocked by the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin, but was independent of phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation. The response was significantly reduced by the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor U0126, which also inhibited carbachol-evoked S6 phosphorylation in HEK cells expressing M2 receptors, but was ineffective in M3 receptor-expressing HEK cells, although carbachol activated MAPK in both transfected lines. The p90 ribosomal S6 kinase has been implicated in mTOR regulation by phorbol esters, but was not activated by carbachol in any of the cell lines tested. The protein kinase C inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide I reduced carbachol-stimulated S6 phosphorylation in SK-N-SH cells, and in HEK cells expressing M3 receptors, but not in HEK cells expressing M2 receptors. The results demonstrate that multiple muscarinic receptor subtypes regulate mTOR, and that both MAPK-dependent and -independent mechanisms may mediate the response in a cell context-specific manner.     

The paired activation of the two components of the muscarinic M3 receptor dimer is required for induction of ERK1/2 phosphorylation

Muscarinic M(3) receptors stimulate ERK1/2, the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. A mutant of the muscarinic M(3) receptor in which most of the third intracellular (i3) loop had been deleted (M(3)-short) completely lost the ability to stimulate the ERK1/2 phosphorylation in COS-7 cells. This loss was evident despite the fact that the receptor was able to couple efficiently to the phospholipase C second messenger pathway. In co-transfected cells, M(3)-short greatly reduced the ability of M(3) to activate ERK1/2. In another set of experiments we tested the ability of a mutant M(3)/M(2)(16aa) receptor, in which the first 16 amino acids of the i3 loop of the M(3) receptor were replaced with the corresponding segment of the muscarinic M(2) receptor to stimulate ERK1/2 phosphorylation. This mutant is not coupled to Galpha(q), but it is weakly coupled to Galpha(i). Despite its coupling modification this receptor was able to stimulate ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Again, M(3)-short greatly reduced the ability of M(3)/M(2)(16aa) to activate ERK1/2 in co-transfected cells. Similar results were obtained in stable-transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells lines. In CHO M(3) cells carbachol induced a biphasic increase of ERK1/2 phosphorylation; a first increase at doses as low as 0.1 microm and a second increase starting from 10 microm. In CHO M(3)-short and in double-transfected CHO M(3)/M(3)-short cells we observed only the lower doses increase of ERK1/2 phosphorylation; no further increase was observed up to 1 mm carbachol. This suggests that in double-transfected CHO cells M(3)-short prevents the effect of the higher doses of carbachol on the M(3) receptor. In a final experiment we tested the ability of co-transfected chimeric alpha(2)/M(3) and M(3)/alpha(2) receptors to activate the ERK1/2 pathway. When given alone, carbachol and, to a lesser extent, clonidine, stimulated the coupling of the co-transfected chimeric receptors to the phospholipase C second messenger pathway, but they were unable to stimulate ERK1/2 phosphorylation. On the contrary, a strong stimulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation was observed when the two agonists were given together despite the fact that the overall increase in phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis was not dissimilar from that observed in cells treated with carbachol alone. Our data suggest that the activation of the ERK1/2 pathway requires the coincident activation of the two components of a receptor dimer.     

Histamine acting on H1 receptor promotes inhibition of proliferation via PLC, RAC, and JNK-dependent pathways

It is well established that histamine modulates cell proliferation through the activation of the histamine H1 receptor (H1R), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that is known to couple to phospholipase C (PLC) activation via Gq. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether H1R activation modulates Rho GTPases, well-known effectors of Gq/G₁₁-coupled receptors, and whether such modulation influences cell proliferation. Experiments were carried out in CHO cells stably expressing H1R (CHO-H1R). By using pull-down assays, we found that both histamine and a selective H1R agonist activated Rac and RhoA in a time- and dose-dependent manner without significant changes in the activation of Cdc42. Histamine response was abolished by the H1R antagonist mepyramine, RGS2 and the PLC inhibitor U73122, suggesting that Rac and RhoA activation is mediated by H1R via Gq coupling to PLC stimulation. Histamine caused a marked activation of serum response factor activity via the H1R, as determined with a serum-responsive element (SRE) luciferase reporter, and this response was inhibited by RhoA inactivation with C3 toxin. Histamine also caused a significant activation of JNK which was inhibited by expression of the Rac-GAP β2-chimaerin. On the other hand, H1R-induced ERK1/2 activation was inhibited by U73122 but not affected by C3 or β2-chimaerin, suggesting that ERK1/2 activation was dependent on PLC and independent of RhoA or Rac. [³H]-Thymidine incorporation assays showed that both histamine and the H1R agonist inhibited cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner and that the effect was independent of RhoA but partially dependent on JNK and Rac. Our results reveal that functional coupling of the H1R to Gq-PLC leads to the activation of RhoA and Rac small GTPases and suggest distinct roles for Rho GTPases in the control of cell proliferation by histamine.     

Phosphorylation and regulation of a G protein-coupled receptor by protein kinase CK2

We demonstrate a role for protein kinase casein kinase 2 (CK2) in the phosphorylation and regulation of the M3-muscarinic receptor in transfected cells and cerebellar granule neurons. On agonist occupation, specific subsets of receptor phosphoacceptor sites (which include the SASSDEED motif in the third intracellular loop) are phosphorylated by CK2. Receptor phosphorylation mediated by CK2 specifically regulates receptor coupling to the Jun-kinase pathway. Importantly, other phosphorylation-dependent receptor processes are regulated by kinases distinct from CK2. We conclude that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be phosphorylated in an agonist-dependent fashion by protein kinases from a diverse range of kinase families, not just the GPCR kinases, and that receptor phosphorylation by a defined kinase determines a specific signalling outcome. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the M3-muscarinic receptor can be differentially phosphorylated in different cell types, indicating that phosphorylation is a flexible regulatory process where the sites that are phosphorylated, and hence the signalling outcome, are dependent on the cell type in which the receptor is expressed.     

Endogenous G protein-coupled receptor kinase 6 Regulates M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor phosphorylation and desensitization in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells

We have previously shown that overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 6 (GRK6) enhanced the phosphorylation and desensitization of the endogenously expressed M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptor in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. In this study we have examined the potential role of endogenous GRK6 in the regulation of M(3) mACh receptor by blocking its action through the introduction of a kinase-dead, dominant-negative GRK6 ((K215R)GRK6). (K215R)GRK6 expression inhibited methacholine-stimulated M(3) mACh receptor phosphorylation by 50% compared with plasmid transfected control cells. Guanosine-5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding and immunoprecipitation studies, conducted after agonist pretreatment (3 min), indicated that M(3) mACh receptor-G alpha(q/11) uncoupling was attenuated by 50% in cells expressing (K215R)GRK6 when compared with control cells. In contrast, expression of the related dominant-negative kinase (K215R)GRK5 had no effect on M(3) mACh receptor phosphorylation or uncoupling. Time course studies also showed that agonist-stimulated [(3)H]inositol phosphate accumulations were more sustained in cells expressing (K215R)GRK6 compared with control and (K215R)GRK5-expressing cells, whereas (K215R)GRK6 expression had no effect on the phospholipase C response to direct stimulation of G proteins with AlF(4)(-). The ability of (K215R)GRK6 to inhibit agonist-mediated M(3) mACh receptor phosphorylation and G protein uncoupling suggests that endogenous GRK6 mediates, at least in part, M(3) mACh receptor desensitization in the SH-SY5Y cell line.     

Properties of chimeric prostacyclin/prostaglandin D2 receptors: site-directed mutagenesis reveals the significance of the isoleucine residue at position 323

Mouse prostacyclin (mIP) receptors transiently expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells activated both adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase C, with a 33-fold preference for signaling through Gs. The prostacyclin (IP) receptor agonists cicaprost, iloprost, carbacyclin, and prostaglandin E1 showed a similar order of potency for activation of both signaling pathways in cells transiently transfected with the mIP and the chimeric prostacyclin/prostaglandin D2 (IPN-VII/DPC and IPN-V/DPVI-C) receptors. Substitution of the carboxyl-terminal tail of the prostacyclin receptor with the corresponding region of the mDP receptor (IPN-VII/DPC) produced a receptor with increased coupling to both Gs and Gq. However, this increased G-protein coupling was lost in the IPN-V/DPVI-C receptor. The observation that both these chimeric receptors can activate phospholipase C indicates that the carboxyl-terminal tail of the IP receptor is not entirely responsible for its ability to couple to Gq. Site-directed mutagenesis studies suggest that isoleucine at position 323 in the IPN-VII/DPC receptor plays an important role in mediating the increased potency of this chimeric receptor.     

Functional expression of M(1), M(3) and M(5) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in yeast

The goal of this study was to functionally express the three G(q)-coupled muscarinic receptor subtypes, M(1), M(3) and M(5), in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Transformation of yeast with expression constructs coding for the full-length receptors resulted in very low numbers of detectable muscarinic binding sites (B(max) < 5 fmol/mg). Strikingly, deletion of the central portion of the third intracellular loops of the M(1), M(3) and M(5) muscarinic receptors resulted in dramatic increases in B(max) values (53-214 fmol/mg). To monitor productive receptor/G-protein coupling, we used specifically engineered yeast strains that required agonist-stimulated receptor/G-protein coupling for cell growth. These studies showed that the shortened versions of the M(1), M(3) and M(5) receptors were unable to productively interact with the endogenous yeast G protein alpha-subunit, Gpa1p, or a Gpa1 mutant subunit that contained C-terminal mammalian Galpha(s) sequence. In contrast, all three receptors gained the ability to efficiently couple to a Gpa1/Galpha(q) hybrid subunit containing C-terminal mammalian Galpha(q) sequence, indicating that the M(1), M(3) and M(5) muscarinic receptors retained proper G-protein coupling selectivity in yeast. This is the first study to report the expression of muscarinic receptors in a coupling-competent form in yeast. The strategy described here, which involves structural modification of both receptors and co-expressed G proteins, should facilitate the functional expression of other classes of G protein-coupled receptors in yeast.