共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
The Norway spruce genome provides key insights into the evolution of plant genomes, leading to testable new hypotheses about conifer, gymnosperm, and vascular plant evolution.In the past year a burst of plant genome sequences have been published, providing enhanced phylogenetic coverage of green plants (Figure (Figure1)1) and inclusion of new agricultural, ecological, and evolutionary models. Collectively, these sequences are revealing some extraordinary structural and evolutionary attributes in plant genomes. Perhaps most surprising is the exceptionally high frequency of whole-genome duplication (WGD): nearly every genome that has been analyzed has borne the signature of one or more WGDs, with particularly notable events having occurred in the common ancestors of seed plants, of angiosperms, and of core eudicots (the latter ''WGD'' represents two WGDs in close succession) [1,2]. Given this tendency for plant genomes to duplicate and then return to an essentially diploid genetic system (an example is the cotton genomes, which have accumulated the effects of perhaps 15 WGDs [3]), the conservation of genomes in terms of gene number, chromosomal organization, and gene content is astonishing. From the publication of the first plant genome, Arabidopsis thaliana [4], the number of inferred genes has been between 25,000 and 30,000, with many gene families shared across all land plants, although the number of members and patterns of expansion and contraction vary. Furthermore, conserved synteny has been detected across the genomes of diverse angiosperms, despite WGDs, diploidization, and millions of years of evolution.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Simplified phylogeny of land plants, showing major clades and their component lineages. Asterisks indicate species (or lineage) for which whole-genome sequence (or sequences) is (are) available. Increases and decreases in genome size are shown by arrows.Despite the proliferation of genome sequences available for angiosperms, genome-level data for both ferns (and their relatives, collectively termed monilophytes; Figure Figure1)1) and gymnosperms have been conspicuously lacking - until recently, with the publication of the genome sequence of the gymnosperm Norway spruce (Picea abies) [5]. The large genome sizes for both monilophytes and gymnosperms have discouraged attempts at genome sequencing and assembly, whereas the smaller genome size of angiosperms has resulted in more genome sequences being available (Table (Table1)1) [6]. Because of this limited phylogenetic sample, our understanding of the timing and phylogenetic positions of WGDs, the core number of plant genes, possible conserved syntenic regions, and patterns of expansion and contraction of gene families across both tracheophytes (vascular plants) and across all land plants is imperfect. This sampling problem is particularly acute in analyses of the genes and genomes of seed plants; many hundreds of genes are present in angiosperms that are not present in mosses or lycophytes, but whether these genes arose in the common ancestor of seed plants or of angiosperms cannot be determined without a gymnosperm genome sequence. The Norway spruce genome therefore offers tremendous power, not only for understanding the structure and evolution of conifer genomes, but also as a reference for interpreting gene and genome evolution in angiosperms.
Open in a separate windown/a, not applicable. Data based on [6]. 相似文献
Table 1
Genome sizes in land plantsLineage | Range (1C; pg) | Mean |
---|---|---|
Gymnosperms | ||
Conifers | ||
Pinaceae | 9.5-36.0 | 23.7 |
Cupressaceae | 8.3-32.1 | 12.8 |
Sciadopitys | 20.8 | n/a |
Gnetales | ||
Ephedraceae | 8.9-15.7 | 8.9 |
Gnetaceae | 2.3-4.0 | 2.3 |
Cycadaceae | 12.6-14.8 | 13.4 |
Ginkgo biloba | 11.75 | n/a |
Monilophytes | ||
Ophioglossaceae | 10.2-65.6 | 31.05 |
Equisetaceae | 12.9-304 | 22.0 |
Psilotum | 72.7 | n/a |
Leptosporangiate ferns | ||
Polypodiaceae | 7.5-19.7 | 7.5 |
Aspleniaceae | 4.1-9.1 | 6.2 |
Athyriaceae | 6.3-9.3 | 7.6 |
Dryopteridaceae | 6.8-23.6 | 11.7 |
Water ferns | ||
Azolla | 0.77 | n/a |
Angiosperms | ||
Oryza sativa | 0.50 | n/a |
Amborella trichopoda | 0.89 | n/a |
Arabidopsis thaliana | 0.16 | n/a |
Zea mays | 2.73 | n/a |
2.
C. P. A. de Haan R. Kivist? M. L. H?nninen 《Applied and environmental microbiology》2010,76(20):6942-6943
Cj0859c variants fspA1 and fspA2 from 669 human, poultry, and bovine Campylobacter jejuni strains were associated with certain hosts and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) types. Among the human and poultry strains, fspA1 was significantly (P < 0.001) more common than fspA2. FspA2 amino acid sequences were the most diverse and were often truncated.Campylobacter jejuni is the leading cause of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide and responsible for more than 90% of Campylobacter infections (7). Case-control studies have identified consumption or handling of raw and undercooked poultry meat, drinking unpasteurized milk, and swimming in natural water sources as risk factors for acquiring domestic campylobacteriosis in Finland (7, 9). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) has been employed to study the molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter (4) and can contribute to virulotyping when combined with known virulence factors (5). FspA proteins are small, acidic, flagellum-secreted nonflagellar proteins of C. jejuni that are encoded by Cj0859c, which is expressed by a σ28 promoter (8). Both FspA1 and FspA2 were shown to be immunogenic in mice and protected against disease after challenge with a homologous strain (1). However, FspA1 also protected against illness after challenge with a heterologous strain, whereas FspA2 failed to do the same at a significant level. Neither FspA1 nor FspA2 protected against colonization (1). On the other hand, FspA2 has been shown to induce apoptosis in INT407 cells, a feature not exhibited by FspA1 (8). Therefore, our aim was to study the distributions of fspA1 and fspA2 among MLST types of Finnish human, chicken, and bovine strains.In total, 367 human isolates, 183 chicken isolates, and 119 bovine isolates (n = 669) were included in the analyses (3). PCR primers for Cj0859c were used as described previously (8). Primer pgo6.13 (5′-TTGTTGCAGTTCCAGCATCGGT-3′) was designed to sequence fspA1. Fisher''s exact test or a chi-square test was used to assess the associations between sequence types (STs) and Cj0859c. The SignalP 3.0 server was used for prediction of signal peptides (2).The fspA1 and fspA2 variants were found in 62.6% and 37.4% of the strains, respectively. In 0.3% of the strains, neither isoform was found. Among the human and chicken strains, fspA1 was significantly more common, whereas fspA2 was significantly more frequent among the bovine isolates (Table (Table1).1). Among the MLST clonal complexes (CCs), fspA1 was associated with the ST-22, ST-45, ST-283, and ST-677 CCs and fspA2 was associated with the ST-21, ST-52, ST-61, ST-206, ST-692, and ST-1332 CCs and ST-58, ST-475, and ST-4001. Although strong CC associations of fspA1 and fspA2 were found, the ST-48 complex showed a heterogeneous distribution of fspA1 and fspA2. Most isolates carried fspA2, and ST-475 was associated with fspA2. On the contrary, ST-48 commonly carried fspA1 (Table (Table1).1). In our previous studies, ST-48 was found in human isolates only (6), while ST-475 was found in both human and bovine isolates (3, 6). The strict host associations and striking difference between fspA variants in human ST-48 isolates and human/bovine ST-475 isolates suggest that fspA could be important in host adaptation.
Open in a separate windowaIn 0.3% of the strains, neither isoform was found. NF, not found.bNA, not associated.A total of 28 isolates (representing 6 CCs and 13 STs) were sequenced for fspA1 and compared to reference strains NCTC 11168 and 81-176. All isolates in the ST-22 CC showed the same one-nucleotide (nt) difference with both NCTC 11168 and 81-176 strains, resulting in a Thr→Ala substitution in the predicted protein sequence (represented by isolate FB7437, GenBank accession number ; Fig. HQ104931Fig.1).1). Eight other isolates in different CCs showed a 2-nt difference (isolate 1970, GenBank accession number ; Fig. HQ104932Fig.1)1) compared to strains NCTC 11168 and 81-176, although this did not result in amino acid substitutions. All 28 isolates were predicted to encode a full-length FspA1 protein.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Comparison of FspA1 and FspA2 isoforms. FspA1 is represented by 81-176, FB7437, and 1970. FspA2 is represented by C. jejuni strains 76763 to 1960 (GenBank accession numbers ). Scale bar represents amino acid divergence.In total, 62 isolates (representing 7 CCs and 35 STs) were subjected to fspA2 sequence analysis. Although a 100% sequence similarity between different STs was found for isolates in the ST-21, ST-45, ST-48, ST-61, and ST-206 CCs, fspA2 was generally more heterogeneous than fspA1 and we found 13 predicted FspA2 amino acid sequence variants in total (Fig. HQ104933 to HQ104946(Fig.1).1). In several isolates with uncommon and often unassigned (UA) STs, the proteins were truncated (Fig. (Fig.1),1), with most mutations being ST specific. For example, all ST-58 isolates showed a 13-bp deletion (isolate 3074_2; Fig. Fig.1),1), resulting in a premature stop codon. Also, all ST-1332 CC isolates were predicted to have a premature stop codon by the addition of a nucleotide between nt 112 and nt 113 (isolate 1960; Fig. Fig.1),1), a feature shared with two isolates typed as ST-4002 (UA). A T68A substitution in ST-1960 (isolate T-73494) also resulted in a premature stop codon. Interestingly, ST-1959 and ST-4003 (represented by isolate 4129) both lacked one triplet (nt 235 to 237), resulting in a shorter FspA2 protein. SignalP analysis showed the probability of a signal peptide between nt 22 and 23 (ACA-AA [between the underlined nucleotides]). An A24C substitution in two other strains, represented by isolate 76580, of ST-693 and ST-993 could possibly result in a truncated FspA2 protein as well.In conclusion, our results showed that FspA1 and FspA2 showed host and MLST associations. The immunogenic FspA1 seems to be conserved among C. jejuni strains, in contrast to the heterogeneous apoptosis-inducing FspA2, of which many isoforms were truncated. FspA proteins could serve as virulence factors for C. jejuni, although their roles herein are not clear at this time. 相似文献
TABLE 1.
Percent distributions of fspA1 and fspA2 variants among 669 human, poultry, and bovine Campylobacter jejuni strains and their associations with hosts, STs, and CCsHost or ST complex/ST (no. of isolates) | % of strains witha: | P valueb | |
---|---|---|---|
fspA1 | fspA2 | ||
Host | |||
All (669) | 64.3 | 35.4 | |
Human (367) | 69.5 | 30.0 | <0.001 |
Poultry (183) | 79.2 | 20.8 | <0.001 |
Bovine (119) | 25.2 | 74.8 | <0.0001 |
ST complex and STs | |||
ST-21 complex (151) | 2.6 | 97.4 | <0.0001 |
ST-50 (76) | NF | 100 | <0.0001 |
ST-53 (19) | NF | 100 | <0.0001 |
ST-451 (9) | NF | 100 | <0.0001 |
ST-883 (11) | NF | 100 | <0.0001 |
ST-22 complex (22) | 100 | NF | <0.0001 |
ST-22 (11) | 100 | NF | <0.01 |
ST-1947 (9) | 100 | NF | 0.03 |
ST-45 complex (268) | 99.3 | 0.7 | <0.0001 |
ST-11 (7) | 100 | NF | NA |
ST-45 (173) | 99.4 | 0.6 | <0.0001 |
ST-137 (22) | 95.5 | 4.5 | 0.001 |
ST-230 (14) | 100 | NF | <0.0001 |
ST-48 complex (18) | 44.4 | 55.6 | NA |
ST-48 (7) | 100 | NF | NA |
ST-475 (8) | NF | 100 | <0.001 |
ST-52 complex (5) | NF | 100 | <0.01 |
ST-52 (4) | NF | 100 | 0.02 |
ST-61 complex (21) | NF | 100 | <0.0001 |
ST-61 (11) | NF | 100 | <0.0001 |
ST-618 (3) | NF | 100 | 0.04 |
ST-206 complex (5) | NF | 100 | <0.01 |
ST-283 complex (24) | 100 | NF | <0.0001 |
ST-267 (23) | 100 | NF | <0.0001 |
ST-677 complex (59) | 100 | NF | <0.0001 |
ST-677 (48) | 100 | NF | <0.0001 |
ST-794 (11) | 100 | NF | <0.001 |
ST-692 complex (3) | NF | 100 | 0.04 |
ST-1034 complex (5) | NF | 80 | NA |
ST-4001 (3) | NF | 100 | 0.04 |
ST-1287 complex/ST-945 (8) | 100 | NF | NA |
ST-1332 complex/ST-1332 (4) | NF | 100 | 0.02 |
Unassigned STs | |||
ST-58 (6) | NF | 100 | <0.01 |
ST-586 (6) | 100 | NF | NA |
3.
Ligios C Cancedda MG Carta A Santucciu C Maestrale C Demontis F Saba M Patta C DeMartini JC Aguzzi A Sigurdson CJ 《Journal of virology》2011,85(2):1136-1139
Prions are misfolded proteins that are infectious and naturally transmitted, causing a fatal neurological disease in humans and animals. Prion shedding routes have been shown to be modified by inflammation in excretory organs, such as the kidney. Here, we show that sheep with scrapie and lentiviral mastitis secrete prions into the milk and infect nearly 90% of naïve suckling lambs. Thus, lentiviruses may enhance prion transmission, conceivably sustaining prion infections in flocks for generations. This study also indicates a risk of prion spread to sheep and potentially to other animals through dietary exposure to pooled sheep milk or milk products.Prion diseases have emerged globally as a significant threat to human and animal health. Recently, human-to-human spread of prions is believed to have occurred through blood transfusions (9, 12, 16), underscoring the importance of understanding possible transmission routes. PrPSc, a misfolded, aggregated form of the normal prion protein, PrPC, commonly accumulates in the follicles of lymphoid tissues, prior to entering the central nervous system (2, 11, 14). Inflammation can cause lymphoid follicles to form in other organs, such as liver and kidney, which leads to prion invasion of organs that are not typically prion permissive (1). In mice, prion infection in the inflamed kidney has the untoward consequence of prion excretion in urine (13). This finding, together with our report of sheep with PrPSc in the inflamed mammary gland (8), has raised concerns of prion secretion into milk.Here, we investigated whether PrPSc in the inflamed mammary gland leads to prion secretion in milk and infection of naïve lambs through suckling. Prion infectivity has been detected in the milk of sheep expressing a prion gene (Prnp) coding for VRQ/VRQ or VRQ/ARQ at polymorphic codons 136, 154, and 171 (3, 4). However, whether (i) sheep-to-lamb transmission of prions in milk leads to clinical prion disease or (ii) sheep with the common ARQ/ARQ Prnp genotype can infect lambs through milk is unknown. We induced a chronic lentiviral mastitis and inoculated ARQ/ARQ Sarda breed sheep with infectious prions. After 14 months, we bred the sheep and collected the milk. To avoid cross-contamination of newborn lambs, we fed the milk to imported known-naïve lambs and then monitored the lambs for signs of prion infection (Fig. (Fig.1A1A).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Sheep infected with prions and maedi-visna virus (MVV) develop lymphofollicular mastitis with PrPSc. (A) Experimental scheme. Sheep were inoculated with culture medium or MVV and were then orally exposed to scrapie prions and bred. Milk was collected near the time point that neurologic signs of scrapie developed and was fed to naïve lambs. The ratio of lambs with detectable PrPSc to lambs fed the indicated milk is shown for each experiment. (B) PrP immunohistochemistry assay of brain and tonsil from milk source sheep shows staining for PrPSc in the brainstem, particularly in the vagal nucleus (indicated by asterisks) and in the tonsillar follicles of scrapie-infected sheep (arrows). (C) Mammary gland (MG) of milk source sheep shows lymphoid follicles (arrowheads) with associated PrPSc (arrows) adjacent to milk ducts (md) in the MVV-inoculated sheep, whereas the medium-inoculated sheep had a histologically normal MG with no detectable PrPSc. Insets show a high magnification of follicles containing PrPSc. Scale bar = 100 μm; scale bar in inset = 25 μm. (D) Western blot analysis shows PrPSc detection in MG of sheep inoculated with MVV/scrapie agents but not in sheep inoculated with scrapie prions only. The sheep identification number is indicated for each lane. PK, proteinase K digested; pos. br, positive brain control; neg. br, negative brain control.To induce a chronic lymphofollicular mastitis, we exposed 7- to 10-day-old lambs (groups of 10) by intratracheal and intravenous routes to a common sheep lentivirus known as maedi-visna virus (MVV) or to cell culture medium only. To do this, lambs were inoculated with 3.5 ml intravenously and 0.5 ml intratracheally of MVV in culture supernatant containing 1.5 × 106 tissue culture infectious doses/ml of the “rapid/high” MVV strain 85/34 (5, 15). Twenty days later, all lambs were orally inoculated with 25 ml of 10% scrapie-infected brain homogenate from a pool of naturally infected Sarda sheep.We sequenced the entire Prnp gene and found that all lambs expressed the ARQ/ARQ Prnp genotype, indicating that the sheep should be susceptible to scrapie. As negative controls, 2 lambs of Prnp genotype ARR/ARR and ARQ/ARQ were mock inoculated with cell culture medium and healthy brain homogenate. All lambs originated from scrapie-free flocks that had been monitored for clinical scrapie cases for at least 3 years.All inoculated sheep were naturally bred to rams at 15 months postinoculation (p.i.) and produced lambs at 20 months p.i. Sheep developed early signs of scrapie just after the lambs were born. Milk from each sheep was manually collected and frozen daily.Eight of 10 MVV-and-scrapie (denoted MVV/scrapie)-inoculated sheep and 9 of 10 scrapie-inoculated sheep showed clinical signs of scrapie, with mean incubation periods of 22 ± 1.4 and 23 ± 1.5 months postinoculation, respectively, and were euthanized. There was no significant difference in incubation period between the groups (Student''s t test, P = 0.5), indicating that inflammation associated with the MVV infection does not accelerate prion disease. This finding is consistent with the results of previous studies that showed that chronic pancreatitis or nephritis did not affect the scrapie incubation period (1). Scrapie infection was confirmed postmortem by the detection of PrPSc in brain and lymphoid tissues by Western blot and immunohistochemistry assays (Fig. (Fig.1B).1B). Interestingly, scrapie did not develop in 3 sheep with a Prnp gene encoding a rare polymorphism at codon 176 (K), consistent with recent reports describing scrapie resistance for this genotype (10).Antibodies to MVV were detected in serum of all the MVV-inoculated sheep by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Elitest kit; Hyphen BioMed). Five of 8 MVV/scrapie-infected sheep (63%) showed a lymphofollicular mastitis (Fig. (Fig.1C),1C), and 3 had a diffuse interacinar lymphoid infiltrate. Of the 5 sheep with lymphofollicular mastitis, 4 had PrPSc deposits detectable by immunohistochemistry and Western blot assays (Fig. 1C and D), whereas no sheep with diffuse lymphoid infiltrates had detectable PrPSc. Surprisingly, 2 of 9 sheep inoculated only with scrapie also had lymphofollicular mastitis and anti-MVV antibodies, one of which had visible PrPSc deposits. MVV is a common pathogen in Europe, and it is possible that these sheep were infected from the dam. The remaining 7 scrapie-inoculated sheep had histologically normal mammary glands (Fig. (Fig.1C)1C) and no detectable PrPSc (Fig. (Fig.1D)1D) or anti-MVV antibodies.We selected the stored milk from the 4 MVV/scrapie-infected sheep with PrPSc in the mammary glands and from the 7 scrapie-infected sheep with histologically normal mammary glands. Milk samples from the early, middle, and late stages of lactation were pooled for each group. We imported naïve Cheviot lambs (n = 9) from flocks that originated from scrapie-free New Zealand and had been bred and housed under strict biosecurity containment in the United Kingdom to ensure that the lambs had not been exposed to scrapie. The Sarda lambs (n = 4) originated from a scrapie-free flock in Sardinia. We then fed pooled milk from MVV/scrapie-infected sheep to each of 8 naïve ARQ/ARQ lambs and from scrapie-infected sheep to 3 naïve ARQ/ARQ lambs ad libitum. Each lamb ingested a total volume of 1 to 2 liters over a total period of 3 days (Table (Table1).1). Two lambs were orally inoculated with brain homogenate pooled from the scrapie-infected milk donors as positive controls. Groups of lambs were housed in separate stalls and subjected to isolation conditions.
Open in a separate windowaThe Prnp genotype of all lambs was ARQ/ARQ at codons 136, 154, and 171. Additional dimorphisms in other codons of Prnp are noted.Of the 8 lambs fed milk from MVV/scrapie-infected sheep, 1 was sacrificed early and 4 developed clinical signs of scrapie at 23 to 28 months p.i. (Table (Table1).1). The 3 remaining MVV/scrapie-exposed lambs and all control lambs were sacrificed between 28 and 29 months p.i. Both lambs orally inoculated with scrapie brain had PrPSc deposits detectable in the brain. The lamb from the MVV/scrapie group that was sacrificed early (12 months p.i.) had developed an intercurrent illness and had no biochemical or histologic evidence of scrapie infection. However, 6 of the 7 (86%) remaining lambs exposed to milk from the MVV/scrapie-infected dams had detectable PrPSc in the brain and lymphoid tissues (Fig. (Fig.2),2), indicating that infection from prion-laden milk was dependent on mammary gland inflammation. No lambs fed milk from the scrapie-only infected dams had detectable PrPSc. We considered that horizontal transmission of prions could have occurred within the MVV/scrapie-exposed lambs; however, Sardinian strains of sheep scrapie are not efficiently transmitted in ARQ/ARQ Sarda sheep, with a maximum recorded prevalence of 41% and an average prevalence of 13% (7).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Lambs developed prion infection through suckling milk from scrapie-infected sheep with mastitis. Brainstem and tonsil from lambs ingesting milk from MVV/scrapie- or scrapie-infected sheep were immunostained for PrP (A) or proteinase K digested (PK) and examined by Western blotting (B). The results show that only the lambs suckling the milk derived from MVV/scrapie-infected sheep accumulated PrPSc. The sheep identification number is indicated for each lane. scr+, scrapie-positive control; scr−, scrapie-negative control. Scale bars = 100 μm.Previous studies have found that the cellular fraction of milk harbors the most infectivity (4), and the higher leukocyte count in milk that occurs with mastitis could conceivably have increased the infectious prion titers in milk. Our studies in ARQ/ARQ sheep suggest that mammary gland inflammation is necessary for prion transmission through milk, although it remains possible that large milk volumes from sheep without mastitis would transmit prions to nursing lambs. Indeed, milk from VRQ/VRQ sheep without clinical mastitis was previously shown to transmit prion infection to the lambs, as evidenced by PrPSc deposits in lymphoid tissue biopsy specimens (3).Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the ingestion of as little as 1 to 2 liters of milk from sheep with scrapie and lymphofollicular mastitis can cause prion infection in ARQ/ARQ lambs at an attack rate of 86%. These data show that a common lentivirus can induce an inflammatory setting highly conducive for prion propagation and secretion in milk, although a role for the virus in transporting prions into the milk or stimulating PrPSc release from infected cells (6) cannot be excluded. Considering that MVV and other lentiviruses are endemic in sheep and goat populations worldwide, the possibility that lentiviruses have enabled prion transmission through milk and, ultimately, the propagation of scrapie through some flocks should be considered. Together with two other recent reports on infectious prions in sheep milk (3, 4), these studies indicate a risk of prion spread to sheep and, potentially, other animals through dietary exposure to sheep milk or milk products. World milk production contributes up to 13% of the protein supply for humans; thus, studies to determine the extent of infectious prions entering our global food supply would be worthwhile and important for accurate risk assessment. 相似文献
TABLE 1.
Genotype, breed, and PrPSc detection in lambs fed milk from MVV/scrapie- or scrapie-infected sheepLamb (dimorphisma) | Milk source infected with: | Amt of milk ingested (liters) | Breed | Clinical signs present | PrPSc detected by WB/IHC in: | Time point postinoculation (mo) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brain | Tonsil | ||||||
951 | MVV/Scrapie | 1.2 | Cheviot | No | −/− | −/− | 12 |
326 (127G/V) | MVV/Scrapie | 1.9 | Sarda | No | −/− | −/− | 28 |
328 (127G/V) | MVV/Scrapie | 1.8 | Sarda | Yes | +/+ | +/+ | 28 |
327 | MVV/Scrapie | 1.4 | Sarda | Yes | +/+ | +/+ | 25 |
847 | MVV/Scrapie | 1.3 | Cheviot | Yes | +/+ | +/+ | 23 |
329 | MVV/Scrapie | 2.1 | Sarda | Yes | +/+ | +/+ | 25 |
843 (141F/L) | MVV/Scrapie | 1.3 | Cheviot | No | +/+ | +/+ | 28 |
849 (141F/L) | MVV/Scrapie | 1.8 | Cheviot | No | +/+ | +/+ | 29 |
953 (141F/L) | Scrapie | 1.5 | Cheviot | No | −/− | −/− | 28 |
956 (141F/L) | Scrapie | 1.7 | Cheviot | No | −/− | −/− | 28 |
957 (141F/L) | Scrapie | 1.4 | Cheviot | No | −/− | −/− | 28 |
4.
Sandra Wydau Guillaume van der Rest Caroline Aubard Pierre Plateau Sylvain Blanquet 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(21):14096-14104
Several l-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases can transfer a
d-amino acid onto their cognate tRNA(s). This harmful reaction is
counteracted by the enzyme d-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase. Two distinct
deacylases were already identified in bacteria (DTD1) and in archaea (DTD2),
respectively. Evidence was given that DTD1 homologs also exist in nearly all
eukaryotes, whereas DTD2 homologs occur in plants. On the other hand, several
bacteria, including most cyanobacteria, lack genes encoding a DTD1 homolog.
Here we show that Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 produces a third type of
deacylase (DTD3). Inactivation of the corresponding gene (dtd3)
renders the growth of Synechocystis sp. hypersensitive to the
presence of d-tyrosine. Based on the available genomes, DTD3-like
proteins are predicted to occur in all cyanobacteria. Moreover, one or several
dtd3-like genes can be recognized in all cellular types, arguing in
favor of the nearubiquity of an enzymatic function involved in the defense of
translational systems against invasion by d-amino acids.Although they are detected in various living organisms (reviewed in Ref.
1), d-amino acids
are thought not to be incorporated into proteins, because of the
stereospecificity of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and of the translational
machinery, including EF-Tu and the ribosome
(2). However, the
discrimination between l- and d-amino acids by
aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is not equal to 100%. Significant
d-aminoacylation of their cognate tRNAs by Escherichia
coli tyrosyl-, tryptophanyl-, aspartyl-, lysyl-, and histidyl-tRNA
synthetases has been characterized in vitro
(3–9).
Recently, using a bacterium, transfer of d-tyrosine onto
tRNATyr was shown to occur in vivo
(10).With such misacylation reactions, the resulting
d-aminoacyl-tRNAs form a pool of metabolically inactive molecules,
at best. At worst, d-aminoacylated tRNAs infiltrate the protein
synthesis machinery. Although the latter harmful possibility has not yet been
firmly established, several cells were shown to possess a
d-tyrosyl-tRNA deacylase, or DTD, that should help them counteract
the accumulation of d-aminoacyl-tRNAs. This enzyme shows a broad
specificity, being able to remove various d-aminoacyl moieties from
the 3′-end of a tRNA
(4–6,
11). Such a function makes the
deacylase a member of the family of enzymes capable of editing in
trans mis-aminoacylated tRNAs. This family includes several homologs
of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase editing domains
(12), as well as peptidyl-tRNA
hydrolase (13,
14).Two distinct deacylases have already been discovered. The first one, called
DTD1, is predicted to occur in most bacteria and eukaryotes (see
d-amino acids, including
d-tyrosine (6). In
fact, in an E. coli Δdtd strain grown in the presence
of 2.4 mm d-tyrosine, as much as 40% of the cellular
tRNATyr pool becomes esterified with d-tyrosine
(10).
Open in a separate windowHomologs of dtd/DTD1 are not found in the available archaeal
genomes except that of Methanosphaera stadtmanae. A search for
deacylase activity in Sulfolobus solfataricus and Pyrococcus
abyssi led to the detection of another enzyme (DTD2), completely
different from the DTD1 protein
(15). Importing dtd2
into E. coli functionally compensates for dtd deprivation.
As shown in 16).Several cells contain neither dtd nor dtd2 homologs
(d-tyrosyl-tRNA deacylase
(DTD3). This protein, encoded by dtd3, behaves as a metalloenzyme.
Sensitivity of the growth of Synechocystis to external
d-tyrosine is strongly exacerbated by the disruption of
dtd3. Moreover, expression of the Synechocystis DTD3 in a
Δdtd E. coli strain, from a plasmid, restores the resistance of
the bacterium to d-tyrosine. Finally, using the available genomes,
we examined the occurrence of DTD3 in the living world. The prevalence of
DTD3-like proteins is surprisingly high. It suggests that the defense of
protein synthesis against d-amino acids is universal. 相似文献
TABLE 1
Distribution of DTD1 and DTD2 homologs in various phylogenetic groupsHomologs of DTD1 and DTD2 were searched for using a genomic Blast analysis against complete genomes in the NCBI Database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Values in the table are number of species. For instance, E. coli is counted only once in γ-proteobacteria despite the fact that several E. coli strains have been sequenced.DTD1 | DTD2 | DTD1 + DTD2 | None | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bacteria | ||||
Acidobacteria | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Actinobacteria | 27 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
Aquificae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi | 12 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Chlamydiae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Chloroflexi | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Cyanobacteria | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
Deinococcus/Thermus | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Firmicutes | ||||
Bacillales | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Clostridia | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lactobacillales | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mollicutes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
Fusobacteria/Planctomycetes | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Proteobacteria | ||||
α | 6 | 0 | 0 | 55 |
β | 24 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
γ | 80 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
δ | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ε | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Spirochaetes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
Thermotogae | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Archaea | ||||
Crenarchaeota | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Euryarchaeota | 1 | 26 | 0 | 2 |
Nanoarchaeota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Eukaryota | ||||
Dictyosteliida | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fungi/Metazoa | ||||
Fungi | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Metazoa | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Kinetoplastida | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Viridiplantae | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
5.
6.
Louise M Egerton-Warburton José Ignacio Querejeta Michael F Allen 《Plant signaling & behavior》2008,3(1):68-71
Apart from improving plant and soil water status during drought, it has been suggested that hydraulic lift (HL) could enhance plant nutrient capture through the flow of mineral nutrients directly from the soil to plant roots, or by maintaining the functioning of mycorrhizal fungi. We evaluated the extent to which the diel cycle of water availability created by HL covaries with the efflux of HL water from the tips of extramatrical (external) mycorrhizal hyphae, and the possible effects on biogeochemical processes. Phenotypic mycorrhizal fungal variables, such as total and live hyphal lengths, were positively correlated with HL efflux from hyphae, soil water potential (dawn), and plant response variables (foliar 15N). The efflux of HL water from hyphae was also correlated with bacterial abundance and soil enzyme activity (P), and the moistening of soil organic matter. Such findings indicate that the efflux of HL water from the external mycorrhizal mycelia may be a complementary explanation for plant nutrient acquisition and survival during drought.Key words: hydraulic lift, nitrogen, phosphorus, microbial abundance, mycorrhizal hyphae, QuercusIn environments that experience seasonal or extended drought, plant productivity, resource partitioning, and competition are limited by the availability of water and mineral nutrients. One mechanism that is important to whole plant water balance in these environments is hydraulic lift (HL), a passive process driven by gradients in water potential among soils layers. Soil water is transported upwards from deep moist soils and released into the nutrient-rich upper soil layers by root systems accessing both deep and shallow soil layers.1 HL water may improve the lifespan and activity of fine roots in a wide variety of plant life forms.2Hydraulic lift may also have a second ecological function in facilitating plant nutrient acquisition.2 It been hypothesized that HL water could enhance the supply of nutrients to roots through mass flow or diffusion,3 or trigger episodes of soil biotic activity such as microbe-mediated nutrient transformations4,5 that are analogous to the increased inflow of nitrogen (N) into roots and flushes of carbon (C) and N mineralization respectively that follow precipitation events.4,6 However, few data currently exist with which to test these possibilities.Hydraulically lifted water also sustains mycorrhizal fungi,7,8 a mutualism that enhances the acquisition of water and mineral nutrients in many terrestrial plant species. Mycorrhizal fungal hyphae provide comprehensive exploration and rapid access to small-scale or temporary nutrient flushes that may not be available to plant roots.9 This resource flow has often been assumed to be a unidirectional flux whereby resources are moved from source (soil) into the sink (plant) by the fungal hyphae. However, there is now evidence to suggest that the physiological plasticity of the peripheral extramatrical hyphae, and in particular the hyphal tips, permits the exudation, and subsequent reabsorption, of water and solutes.10,11 Laboratory experiments using pure cultures have demonstrated that water may be exuded from the hyphal tips, especially in fungal species with hydrophobic hyphae, along with a variety of organic molecules, such as free amino acids.10–13 At the same time, water, mobile minerals, amino acids and other low-molecular weight metabolites may be selectively and actively reabsorbed by mycorrhizal fungal hyphae.11 However, quantitative data on the environmental impact of hyphal exudation and reabsorption is still largely lacking.We ask: could the diel cycle of water availability created by HL produce a water efflux from hyphal tips and if so, would this be sufficient to impact biogeochemical processes? Is there also an opposite rhythm driven by plant transpiration so that any resultant soil solution is pulled towards hyphal tips and consequently, the host plant? By imposing drought on seedlings of Quercus agrifolia Nee (coast live oak; Fagaceae) grown in mesocosms (Fig. 1), we identified a composite of feedbacks that could influence nutrient capture with HL (Fig. 2). Our analyses provide support for the key predictions of the HL-nutrient cycling scenario including the efflux of HL water from the extramatrical hyphae (Fig. 3), moistening of soil organic matter (Figs. 3 and and4),4), and the maintenance of soil microbial activity and nutrient capture (N, P; Open in a separate windowFigure 1Quercus mesocosms demonstrating the plant, root, and hyphal compartments. Details of soil conditions, plant inoculation protocol, mycorrhizal fungi and dye injection methods are detailed in previous work (ref. 7) Point 1 (tap root compartment) denotes the region in which fluorescent tracer dyes were injected into the mesocosm at dusk to track the path of HL water. Point 2 (hyphal chamber) denotes spots adjacent to or distant from the mesh screen into which a small volume (200 µl) of fluorescent and 15N tracers (99% as 15NH415NO3) were injected at dawn to measure water and nutrient uptake by the external hyphae.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Path analysis of the influence of different soil and mycorrhizal factors on nutrient capture with HL, and resultant model showing the significant path coefficients among variables in the Q. agrifolia mesocosms. Lines with a single arrow denote possible cause-effect relationships. The partial correlation coefficients adjacent to each line indicate the strength of the association between the individual factors. Thick lines are statistically significant (p < 0.05) whereas thin lines indicate no significant relationship between parameters (p > 0.05) and only significant coefficients are given (p < 0.05).Open in a separate windowFigure 3Fluorescently-labeled structures recovered from the hyphal chamber of Quercus microcosms following 80 days of soil drying and with nocturnal hydraulic lift. Yellow-green fluorescence indicates samples labeled with Lucifer yellow CH (LYCH), blue fluorescence denotes samples labeled with Cascade blue (CB) hydrazide. (A) CB-labeled leaf litter from the soil and (B) soil particle; (C) LYCH-labeled root fragment in the soil mixture with adherent extramatrical hyphae; (D) LYCH tracer dye fluorescence in labeled extramatrical hyphae and in efflux (arrow) from the hyphal tip onto organic matter; (E and F) external hyphae filled with LYCH (influx; arrow) and (G) background fluorescence in non-labeled extramatrical hyphae.Open in a separate windowFigure 4Measurements of hyphal efflux and influx based on the quantitative analysis of LYCH fluorescence intensity in soil solution. Fluorescent intensity values were converted to LYCH concentration using a standard curve generated for the dye since fluorescent intensity correlates with the number of fluorescent molecules in solution. Influx is the uptake of LYCH by hyphae as driven by plant transpiration demands (day), and measured efflux is the passive loss of LYCH from hyphae into the surrounding soil during HL (night). Vertical bars indicate the standard error of the means.
Open in a separate windowWithin each row, mean values with the same letter do not differ significantly at p < 0.05.*Microbial genes: + detected in soil; ++ abundant in soil; nd, not detected in sample.§Percentage of 15N uptake based on two-source mixing-model of δ15N (‰) in plant and hyphal material following the spot application of 15NH415NO3 to the hyphal compartment. 相似文献
Table 1
Summary of soil, microbial, mycorrhizal and plant parameters in plant or hyphal compartmentsCompartment and Location | |||
Trait | Plant | Hyphal (Near Mesh) | Hyphal (Away from Mesh) |
γs Dawn (MPa) | -4.19 (0.31)b | -2.04 (0.66)a | -2.09 (0.31)a |
γs Dusk (MPa) | -20.3 (2.10)b | -2.55 (0.49)a | -2.09 (0.30)a |
Phosphatase activity (µg pNP g-1 hr-1) | 346 (41)b | 1289 (38)a | 1128 (33)a |
Microbial abundance (colonies g-1 soil x 106) | 2.55 (0.28)b | 4.72 (1.21)a | 3.54 (0.37)a |
Total hyphal length (AMF + EM; m g-1 soil) | 29 (13)b | 235 (45)a | 208 (52)a |
Live hyphal length (dye-labeled AMF + EM hyphae; m g-1 soil) | 29 (3.5) b | 75 (0.3)a | 69 (2.1)a |
*Abundance of microbial genes: | |||
16s rRNA | ++ | ++ | ++ |
nirK | + | + | + |
nirS | nd | nd | nd |
amoA | ++ | ++ | ++ |
§Percentage of 15N incorporated into plant or fungal biomass | Old leaves 0.10 | Hyphae 4.34 | Hyphae 5.70 |
New leaves 5.74 | |||
Fine roots 1.42 |
7.
8.
9.
Genital coevolution between the sexes is expected to be common because of the direct interaction between male and female genitalia during copulation. Here we review the diverse mechanisms of genital coevolution that include natural selection, female mate choice, male–male competition, and how their interactions generate sexual conflict that can lead to sexually antagonistic coevolution. Natural selection on genital morphology will result in size coevolution to allow for copulation to be mechanically possible, even as other features of genitalia may reflect the action of other mechanisms of selection. Genital coevolution is explicitly predicted by at least three mechanisms of genital evolution: lock and key to prevent hybridization, female choice, and sexual conflict. Although some good examples exist in support of each of these mechanisms, more data on quantitative female genital variation and studies of functional morphology during copulation are needed to understand more general patterns. A combination of different approaches is required to continue to advance our understanding of genital coevolution. Knowledge of the ecology and behavior of the studied species combined with functional morphology, quantitative morphological tools, experimental manipulation, and experimental evolution have been provided in the best-studied species, all of which are invertebrates. Therefore, attention to vertebrates in any of these areas is badly needed.Of all the evolutionary interactions between the sexes, the mechanical interaction of genitalia during copulation in species with internal fertilization is perhaps the most direct. For this reason alone, coevolution between genital morphologies of males and females is expected. Morphological and genetic components of male and female genitalia have been shown to covary in many taxa (Sota and Kubota 1998; Ilango and Lane 2000; Arnqvist and Rowe 2002; Brennan et al. 2007; Rönn et al. 2007; Kuntner et al. 2009; Tatarnic and Cassis 2010; Cayetano et al. 2011; Evans et al. 2011, 2013; Simmons and García-González 2011; Yassin and Orgogozo 2013; and see examples in Taxa Male structures Female structures Evidence Likely mechanism References Mollusks Land snails (Xerocrassa) Spermatophore-producing organs Spermatophore-receiving organs Comparative among species SAC or female choice Sauder and Hausdorf 2009 Satsuma Penis length Vagina length Character displacement Lock and key Kameda et al. 2009 Arthropods Arachnids (Nephilid spiders) Multiple Multiple Comparative among species SAC Kuntner et al. 2009 Pholcidae spiders Cheliceral apophysis Epigynal pockets Comparative (no phylogenetic analysis) Female choice Huber 1999 Harvestmen (Opiliones) Hardened penes and loss of nuptial gifts Sclerotized pregenital barriers Comparative among species SAC Burns et al. 2013 Millipedes Parafontaria tonominea Gonopod size Genital segment size Comparative in species complex Mechanical incompatibility resulting from Intersexual selection Sota and Tanabe 2010 Antichiropus variabilis Gonopod shape and size Accesory lobe of the vulva and distal projection Functional copulatory morphology Lock and key Wojcieszek and Simmons 2012 Crustacean Fiddler crabs, Uca Gonopode Vulva, vagina, and spermatheca Two-species comparison, shape correspondence Natural selection against fluid loss, lock and key, and sexual selection Lautenschlager et al. 2010 Hexapodes Odonates Clasping appendages Abdominal shape and sensory hairs Functional morphology, comparative among species Lock and key via female sensory system Robertson and Paterson 1982; McPeek et al. 2009 Insects Coleoptera: seed beetles Spiny aedagus Thickened walls of copulatory duct Comparative among species SAC Rönn et al. 2007 Callosobruchus: Callosobruchus maculatus Damage inflicted Susceptibility to damage Full sib/half sib mating experiments SAC Gay et al. 2011 Reduced spines No correlated response Experimental evolution SAC Cayetano et al. 2011 Carabid beetles (Ohomopterus) Apophysis of the endophallus Vaginal appendix (pocket attached to the vaginal apophysis) Cross-species matings Lock and key Sota and Kubota 1998; Sasabi et al. 2010 Dung beetle: Onthophagus taurus Shape of the parameres in the aedagus Size and location of genital pits Experimental evolution Female choice Simmons and García-González 2011 Diptera: Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba Sclerotized spikes on the aedagus Cavities with sclerotized platelets Cross-species matings SAC Kamimura 2012 Drosophila melanogaster species complex Epandrial posterior lobes
Oviscapt pouches Comparative among species SAC or female choice Yassin and Orgogozo 2013 Phallic spikes Oviscapt furrows Cercal teeth, phallic hook, and spines Uterine, vulval, and vaginal shields D. mauritiana and D. sechelia Posterior lobe of the genital arch Wounding of the female abdomen Mating with introgressed lines SAC Masly and Kamimura 2014 Stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae) Genital process Common spermathecal duct Comparative among species and morphological Female choice Kotrba et al. 2014 Tse-tse flies: Glossina pallidipes Cercal teeth Female-sensing structures Experimental copulatory function Female choice Briceño and Eberhard 2009a,b Phelebotomine: sand flies Aedagal filaments, aedagal sheaths Spermathecal ducts length, base of the duct Comparative among species None specified Ilango and Lane 2000 Heteroptera: Bed bugs (Cimiciidae) Piercing genitalia Spermalege (thickened exosqueleton) Comparative among species SAC Carayon 1966; Morrow and Arnqvist 2003 Plant bugs (Coridromius) Changes in male genital shape External female paragenitalia Comparative among species SAC Tatarnic and Cassis 2010 Waterstriders (Gerris sp.) Grasping appendages Antigrasping appendages Comparative among species SAC Arnqvist and Rowe 2002 Gerris incognitus Grasping appendages Antigrasping appendages Comparative among populations SAC Perry and Rowe 2012 Bee assassins (Apiomerus) Aedagus Bursa copulatrix Comparative among species None Forero et al. 2013 Cave insects (Psocodea), Neotrogla Male genital chamber Penis-like gynosome Comparative among species Female competition (role reversal), coevolution SAC Yoshizawa et al. 2014 Butterflies (Heliconiinae) Thickness of spermatophore wall Signa: Sclerotized structure to break spermatophores Comparative among species SAC Sánchez and Cordero 2014 Fish Basking shark: Cetorhinus maximus Clasper claw Thick vaginal pads Morphological observation None Matthews 1950 Gambusia Gonopodial tips Genital papillae within openings Comparative among species Strong character displacement Langerhans 2011 Poecilia reticulata Gonopodium tip shape Female gonopore shape Comparative among populations SAC Evans et al. 2011 Reptiles Anoles Hemipene shape Vagina shape Shape correspondence, two species Sexual selection Köhler et al. 2012 Several species Hemipene shape Vagina shape Shape correspondence Lock and key, female choice, and SAC Pope 1941; Böhme and Ziegler 2009; King et al. 2009 Asiatic pit vipers Spininess in hemipenes Thickness of vagina wall Two-species comparison None Pope 1941 Garter snake: Thamnophis sirtalis Basal hempene spine Vaginal muscular control Experimental manipulation SAC Friesen et al. 2014 Birds Waterfowl Penis length Vaginal elaboration Comparative among species SAC Brennan et al. 2007 Tinamous Penis length/presence Vaginal elaboration Comparative among species Female choice/natural selection PLR Brennan, K Zyscowski, and RO Prum, unpubl. Mammals Marsupials Bifid penis Two lateral vaginae Shape correspondence None Renfree 1987 Equidna Bifid penis with four rosettes Single vagina splits into two uteri Shape correspondence None Augee et al. 2006; Johnston et al. 2007 Insectivores: Short-tailed shrew: Blarina brevicauda S-shaped curve of the erect penis Coincident curve in the vagina Shape correspondence None Bedford et al. 2004 Common tenrec: Tenrec caudatus Filiform penis (up to 70% of the male’s body length) Internal circular folds in the vagina Length correspondence None Bedford et al. 2004 Rodents: Cape dune mole: Bathyergus suillus Penis and baculum length Vaginal length Allometric relationships within species None Kinahan et al. 2007 Australian hopping mice (Notomys) Spiny penis Derived distal region in the vagina Morphological observation and two-species comparison Copulatory lock Breed et al. 2013 Pig: Sus domesticus Filiform penis end Cervical ridges Artificial insemination Female choice Bonet et al. 2013 Primates: Macaca arctoides Long and filamentous glans Vestibular colliculus (fleshy fold) that partially obstructs the entrance to the vagina Shape correspondence and comparison with close relatives None Fooden 1967