生态系统多稳态研究进展

在多稳态的生态系统中,外力可能导致生态系统状态突然之间发生不可逆转的转变,从而达到一个新的平衡状态。但目前对多稳态理论的系统研究很少,如何使用预警信号来预测生态系统的状态转变依旧是个难题。通过多稳态理论的梳理提出了一个更加综合的多稳态定义,并以放牧模型为例,系统总结了多稳态理论的相关概念,将多稳态理论应用在生态系统演替和扰沌理论的解释中;通过对生态系统稳态转换预警信号的原理、优缺点和应用条件的分析,对不同尺度下多稳态的研究方法进行了归纳;最后提出了目前多稳态领域的研究问题和未来的研究重点。结果表明:(1)将时间和空间预警信号结合在一起,并量化正确预警信号的概率,对错误预警信号的比例进行加权,可能会提供更准确的稳态转换的预报。(2)定量观测试验适用于小尺度的研究,而较大尺度的研究则采用简化的模型来模拟研究,选择正确的尺度极有可能改变预警信号的可靠性。(3)结合多稳态理论研究生态系统临界转换和反馈控制机制,并将基于性状的特征指标和进化动力学纳入其中,是生态系统修复实践的重要研究方向。(4)将多稳态相关理论和生态保护管理政策的实践相结合,是多稳态理论未来应用的前景。本研究为多稳态理论和实践的...     

Spatial early warning signals for impending regime shifts: A practical framework for application in real‐world landscapes

Prediction of ecosystem response to global environmental change is a pressing scientific challenge of major societal relevance. Many ecosystems display nonlinear responses to environmental change, and may even undergo practically irreversible ‘regime shifts’ that initiate ecosystem collapse. Recently, early warning signals based on spatiotemporal metrics have been proposed for the identification of impending regime shifts. The rapidly increasing availability of remotely sensed data provides excellent opportunities to apply such model‐based spatial early warning signals in the real world, to assess ecosystem resilience and identify impending regime shifts induced by global change. Such information would allow land‐managers and policy makers to interfere and avoid catastrophic shifts, but also to induce regime shifts that move ecosystems to a desired state. Here, we show that the application of spatial early warning signals in real‐world landscapes presents unique and unexpected challenges, and may result in misleading conclusions when employed without careful consideration of the spatial data and processes at hand. We identify key practical and theoretical issues and provide guidelines for applying spatial early warning signals in heterogeneous, real‐world landscapes based on literature review and examples from real‐world data. Major identified issues include (1) spatial heterogeneity in real‐world landscapes may enhance reversibility of regime shifts and boost landscape‐level resilience to environmental change (2) ecosystem states are often difficult to define, while these definitions have great impact on spatial early warning signals and (3) spatial environmental variability and socio‐economic factors may affect spatial patterns, spatial early warning signals and associated regime shift predictions. We propose a novel framework, shifting from an ecosystem perspective towards a landscape approach. The framework can be used to identify conditions under which resilience assessment with spatial remotely sensed data may be successful, to support well‐informed application of spatial early warning signals, and to improve predictions of ecosystem responses to global environmental change.     

Robustness of early warning signals for catastrophic and non‐catastrophic transitions

Early warning signals (EWS) are statistical indicators that a rapid regime shift may be forthcoming. Their development has given ecologists hope of predicting rapid regime shifts before they occur. Accurate predictions, however, rely on the signals being appropriate to the system in question. Most of the EWS commonly applied in ecology have been studied in the context of one specific type of regime shift (the type brought on by a saddle‐node bifurcation, at which one stable equilibrium point collides with an unstable equilibrium and disappears) under one particular perturbation scheme (temporally uncorrelated noise that perturbs the net population growth rate in a density independent way). Whether and when these EWS can be applied to other ecological situations remains relatively unknown, and certainly underappreciated. We study a range of models with different types of dynamical transitions (including rapid regime shifts) and several perturbation schemes (density‐dependent uncorrelated or temporally‐correlated noise) and test the ability of EWS to warn of an approaching transition. We also test the sensitivity of our results to the amount of available pre‐transition data and various decisions that must be made in the analysis (i.e. the rolling window size and smoothing bandwidth used to compute the EWS). We find that EWS generally work well to signal an impending saddle‐node bifurcation, regardless of the autocorrelation or intensity of the noise. However, EWS do not reliably appear as expected for other types of transition. EWS were often very sensitive to the length of the pre‐transition time series analyzed, and usually less sensitive to other decisions. We conclude that the EWS perform well for saddle‐node bifurcation in a range of noise environments, but different methods should be used to predict other types of regime shifts. As a consequence, knowledge of the mechanism behind a possible regime shift is needed before EWS can be used to predict it.     

浅水湖泊稳态转换预警识别方法局限与展望

浅水湖泊水体底泥交换强烈,极易受人类活动干扰,超过一定阈值即可能发生灾难性的稳态转换,对其有效识别有助于湖泊富营养化的及时防控与修复。浅水湖泊稳态转换可通过系统关键变量(叶绿素、溶解氧、浮游动物、鱼类等)的时间序列(判别不同稳态)、预警信号及阈值等进行识别,其中预警识别可为湖泊生态系统稳态转换提供预判信息,有利于早预警早行动。目前,浅水湖泊稳态转换预警识别因子(方差及自相关性等)主要用于"临界慢化"现象,但在强大外力作用、强烈随机扰动及极端事件下,这些"临界慢化"因子则可能出现误用或错用。基于浅水湖泊基本特征,针对稳态转换的不同驱动机制,探讨"临界慢化"因子的适用性与局限性,并展望其未来发展方向,旨在为湖泊生态系统稳态转换预警识别提供科学参考。