Differential epigenetic regulation of BDNF and NT-3 genes by trichostatin A and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine in Neuro-2a cells

To understand epigenetic regulation of neurotrophins in Neuro-2a mouse neuroblastoma cells, we investigated the alteration of CpG methylation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) promoter I and neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) promoter IB and that of histone modification in Neuro-2a cells. Bisulfite genomic sequencing showed that the CpG sites of BDNF promoter I were methylated in non-treated Neuro-2a cells and demethylated following 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) treatment. In contrast, methylation status of the NT-3 promoter IB did not change by 5-aza-dC treatment in Neuro-2a cells. Furthermore, we demonstrated that BDNF exon I-IX mRNA was induced by trichostatin A (TSA) treatment. However, NT-3 exon IB-II mRNA was not induced by TSA treatment. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that the levels of acetylated histones H3 and H4 on BDNF promoter I were increased by TSA. These results demonstrate that DNA methylation and/or histone modification regulate BDNF gene expression, but do not regulate NT-3 gene expression in Neuro-2a cells.     

UHRF1 Induces Methylation of the TXNIP Promoter and Down-Regulates Gene Expression in Cervical Cancer

DNA methylation, and consequent down-regulation, of tumour suppressor genes occurs in response to epigenetic stimuli during cancer development. Similarly, human oncoviruses, including human papillomavirus (HPV), up-regulate and augment DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) activities, thereby decreasing tumour suppressor genes (TSGs) expression. Ubiquitin-like containing PHD and RING finger domain 1 (UHRF1), an epigenetic regulator of DNA methylation, is overexpressed in HPV-induced cervical cancers. Here, we investigated the role of UHRF1 in cervical cancer by knocking down its expression in HeLa cells using lentiviral-encoded short hairpin (sh)RNA and performing cDNA microarrays. We detected significantly elevated expression of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP), a known TSG, in UHRF1-knockdown cells, and this gene is hypermethylated in cervical cancer tissue and cell lines, as indicated by whole-genome methylation analysis. Up-regulation of UHRF1 and decreased TXNIP were further detected in cervical cancer by western blot and immunohistochemistry and confirmed by Oncomine database analysis. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we identified the inverted CCAAT domain-containing UHRF1-binding site in the TXNIP promoter and demonstrated UHRF1 knockdown decreases UHRF1 promoter binding and enhances TXNIP expression through demethylation of this region. TXNIP promoter CpG methylation was further confirmed in cervical cancer tissue by pyrosequencing and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Critically, down-regulation of UHRF1 by siRNA or UHRF1 antagonist (thymoquinone) induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, and ubiquitin-specific protease 7 (USP7), which stabilises and promotes UHRF1 function, is increased by HPV viral protein E6/E7 overexpression. These results indicate HPV might induce carcinogenesis through UHRF1-mediated TXNIP promoter methylation, thus suggesting a possible link between CpG methylation and cervical cancer.     

Tumor-suppressive function of EZH2 is through inhibiting glutaminase

Tumors can use metabolic reprogramming to survive nutrient stress. Epigenetic regulators play a critical role in metabolic adaptation. Here we screened a sgRNA library to identify epigenetic regulators responsible for the vulnerability of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells to glucose deprivation and found that more EZH2-knockout cells survived glucose deprivation. Then, we showed that EZH2 expression was significantly downregulated in response to glucose deprivation in a glucose-sensitive CRC cell line, and EZH2-knockdown cells were more resistant to glucose deprivation. Mechanistically, EZH2 deficiency upregulated the expression of glutaminase (GLS) and promoted the production of glutamate, which in turn led to increased synthesis of intracellular glutathione (GSH) and eventually attenuated the reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated cell death induced by glucose deprivation. Although EZH2 functioned as an oncogene in cancer progression and EZH2 knockout abolished colorectal cancer development in a mouse model, here we revealed a mechanistic link between EZH2 and metabolic reprogramming via the direct regulation of GLS expression and observed a negative correlation between EZH2 and GLS expression in colorectal cancer tissues. These findings further confirmed the importance of heterogeneity, provided an explanation for the clinical tolerance of cancer cells to EZH2 inhibitors from the perspective of metabolism, and proposed the possibility of combining EZH2 inhibitors and glutamine metabolism inhibitors for the treatment of cancer.Subject terms: Cancer metabolism, Colon cancer     

Role of histone deacetylation in cell-specific expression of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase

Histone acetylation plays an important role in chromatin remodeling and gene expression. The molecular mechanisms involved in cell-specific expression of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) are not fully understood. In this study we investigated whether histone deacetylation was involved in repression of eNOS expression in non-endothelial cells. Induction of eNOS expression by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors trichostatin A (TSA) and sodium butyrate was observed in all four different types of non-endothelial cells examined. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that the induction of eNOS expression by TSA was accompanied by a remarkable increase of acetylation of histone H3 associated with the eNOS 5'-flanking region in the non-endothelial cells. Moreover, DNA methylation-mediated repression of eNOS promoter activity was partially reversed by TSA treatment, and combined treatment of TSA and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (AzadC) synergistically induced eNOS expression in non-endothelial cells. The proximal Sp1 site is critical for basal activity of eNOS promoter. The induction of eNOS by inhibition of HDACs in non-endothelial cells, however, appeared not mediated by the changes in Sp1 DNA binding activity. We further showed that Sp1 bound to the endogenous eNOS promoter and associated with HDAC1 in non-endothelial HeLa cells. Combined TSA and AzadC treatment increased Sp1 binding to the endogenous eNOS promoter but decreased the association between HDAC1 and Sp1 in HeLa cells. Our data suggest that HDAC1 plays a critical role in eNOS repression, and the proximal Sp1 site may serve a key target for HDCA1-mediated eNOS repression in non-endothelial cells.