Suppressor T cell mechanisms in contact sensitivity. II. Afferent blockade by alloinduced suppressor T cells.

We investigated the mechanism(s) by which MHC-restricted suppressor T cells (Ts) induced by i.v. injection of allogeneic DNP-modified lymphoid cells (alloinduced Ts) suppress the DNFB contact sensitivity response. It was shown that alloinduced Ts acted only during the early phases (afferent limb) of sensitization. They were incapable of suppressing previously sensitized recipients or of inhibiting the expression of DNFB-immune LN cells when co-transferred into normal recipients. The target of alloinduced Ts seems to be cell proliferation, i.e., inhibition of antigen-induced cell proliferation (DNA synthesis) in Ts recipient mice. The failure of recipients of alloinduced Ts to generate DNFB-immune LN cells capable of transferring contact sensitivity to normal recipients also suggests that these Ts act by preventing the development of an expanded clone of mature immune T cells. The suppressive effects of alloinduced Ts also were inhibited by prior in vitro treatment with anti-TNP serum. The data are discussed in terms of current models of suppression, and are compared to mechanisms of suppression in other contact sensitivity models.     

Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. VII. Functional demonstration of cell-associated tolerogen in lymph node cell populations containing specific suppressor cells.

Adoptive tolerance to contact sensitivity to DNFB is mediated by suppressor T cells. These cells are induced by iv injection of the hapten DNB-SO₃. Experiments were carried out to investigate the question of simultaneous transfer of tolerogen (DNB-SO₃ or its conjugation product DNP) with the suppressor cells. The results showed that tolerant lymph node cells pretreated in vitro with anti-TNP serum before transfer were unable to induce unresponsiveness to DNFB. Tolerant cells treated with either anti-TNP serum which had been passed over a TNP-affinity column or with polyvalent anti-immunoglobul in serum were not inhibited. These results functionally demonstrate that LN cell populations containing DNFB suppressor cells have accessible hapten (e.g., DNP) associated with their membrane, which is necessary for induction of adoptive tolerance. The hapten (tolerogen) appears to be bound directly to the cell surface rather than as an immune complex.     

Immune suppression with supraoptimal doses of antigen in contact sensitivity. I. Demonstration of suppressor cells and their sensitivity to cyclophosphamide.

Immunologic suppression was induced in a mouse model of contact sensitization to DNFB by using supraoptimal doses of antigen. In these studies, in vivo measurement of ear swelling as an indication of immunologic responsiveness correlated well with measurement of in vitro antigen-induced cell proliferation. This unresponsiveness was specific, since supraoptimal doses of DNFB did not interfere with the development of contact sensitivity to another contactant, oxazolone. The decrease in responsiveness is a form of active suppression, as lymphoid cells from supraoptimally sensitized donors transferred suppression to normal recipients. Furthermore, pretreatment with cyclophosphamide (Cy) reversed the suppression seen in supraoptimally sensitized animals but had no effect on the optimal sensitization regimen. These results indicate that supraoptimal doses of contactants can activate suppressor cells and that precursors of these cells are sensitive to Cy. Such suppressors regenerate within 7 to 14 days after Cy treatment. The ability of Cy pretreatment to affect supraoptimal sensitization without affecting optimal sensitization confirms other reports indicating that the observed results of Cy treatment depend critically upon the dose of antigen used.     

Suppressor cells for the afferent phase of contact sensitivity to picryl chloride: inhibition of DNA synthesis induced by T cells from mice injected with picryl sulfonic acid.

Previous reports have shown that picryl sulfonic acid (PSA) induces suppressor T cells that inhibit the effector phase of contact sensitivity, whereeas its DNP counterpart, dinitrobenzenesulfonate (DNBS) induces cells that inhibit the afferent phase of sensitization. Accordingly, cells from mice injected with DNBS, but not PSA, could be shown to inhibit the DNA synthesis in the lymph nodes that occurs during sensitization. It is now shown that PSA does induce T cells that suppress DNA synthesis but this can only be detected with enriched T cells or by using a regimen of PSA injection different frm previously used to induce suppressor cells for the effector phase. The T cells did not affect responses to oxazolone or dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) and were distinguishable from suppressors of the efferent phase in that they could be produced in adult thymectomized but not cyclophosphamide-treated mice. T cells from mice injected with DNBS that inhibited DNA synthesis to DNFB had the same properties.     

Immunopotentiating effects of amphotericin B. I. Enhanced contact sensitivity in mice.

Contact sensitivity responses to dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) or oxazolone were enhanced by amphotericin B (AmB) administration. This adjuvant effect of AmB was documented in mice by ear thickness measurements, ear histology, and the 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine-125I ear assay. The optimum immunopotentiating effect of AmB required its simultaneous administration at the time of skin sensitization. AmB-induced adjuvant effects were also observed in adoptive transfer experiments in which syngeneic recipients of lymph node cells from animals sensitized with DNFB plus AmB gave stronger contact sensitivity responses than recipients of cells from mice sensitized with DNFB alone. AmB also interfered with tolerance induction by i.v. dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid, suggesting that its adjuvant effects involve inhibition of suppressor cells or their precursors.     

Immunopotentiating effects of amphotericin B. II. Enhanced in vitro proliferative responses of murine lymphocytes.

Enhanced in vitro proliferative responses to DNBSO3 were seen in lymph node cells and spleen cells after in vivo sensitization of mice with DNFB plus AmB compared with mice primed with DNFB alone. The T cell proliferation in the nylon column nonadherent fraction for both groups was highly similar, and the enhanced lymph node cell proliferation with AmB was demonstrated to be in the nylon adherent population consisting of both T and B cells. These and earlier studies of immunopotentiation by AmB are consistent with a mechanism that depends on selective interaction of the polyene with a subset of T cells and a resultant impairment of the normally induced suppressor regulation that limits the magnitude and duration of immune responses.     

Immunomodulating activities of staphylococcal enterotoxins. I. Effects on in vivo antibody responses and contact sensitivity reaction

The immunomodulating effects of staphylococcal enterotoxins on in vivo immune responses in C57BL/6 mice were examined. Of the five serological types A (SEA), B, C, D, and E (SEE), only SEA and SEE markedly suppressed the antibody response to sheep red blood cells (SRBC) when injected 1 day before or on the day of immunization with SRBC. Further study of SEA revealed that it did not affect the antibody response to a thymus-independent antigen, salmonella flagella, but did affect the T-cell-mediated immune response. Contact sensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) was suppressed when SEA was injected before sensitization or before challenge with DNFB, indicating that SEA affected both the afferent and efferent phases of DNFB contact sensitivity. As the suppression of DNFB contact sensitivity could be transferred by anti-Thy-1.2 antibody-sensitive spleen cells of SEA injected donors into normal or DNFB-sensitized recipients, the suppression was thought to be an active one. However, SEA could augment the DNFB contact sensitivity when injected on the third day after sensitization with DNFB. These results indicate that the immunomodulating effects of SEA can be mediated by the T-cell function.     

Antigen presented in the local lymph node by cells from dimethylbenzanthracene-treated murine epidermis activates suppressor cells

Application to skin depleted of LC by treatment with the chemical carcinogen DMBA of a dose of contact sensitizer optimal for inducing contact sensitivity activates transferrable suppressor cells. Excision of solvent- or DMBA-treated skin at various times following application of the contact sensitizer DNFB indicated that the fraction of antigen which leaves the skin within the first few hours induces tolerance. An initial signal inducing unresponsiveness, observed within 1/2 hr, was overturned 3-6 hr later. A more permanent tolerogenic signal in the DMBA- but not solvent-treated lymph node resulted from an epidermal cell from DMBA-treated skin presenting antigen to suppressor cells. Therefore it is likely that suppressor cells are activated in DMBA-treated mice by an epidermal cell which migrates to the local lymph node. Local lymph node cells from DMBA-treated mice also have a diminished ability to present antigen in vivo but they do not activate suppressor cells.     

Antigen-specific T contrasuppressor factor in cell-mediated immunity: interactions leading to eradication of the tolerant state

Interactions between a T cell-derived, antigen-specific, contrasuppressor factor (TcsF) and immune T cells that block the action of T suppressor factors and allow the transfer of cellular immunity into tolerant recipients are described. Immune T cells from contact-sensitized donors are capable of transferring specific immunity into normal recipients but not into animals rendered tolerant to the specific antigen. Brief exposure of the immune cells to the TcsF enables the effective transfer of immunity into such tolerant recipients. In addition, treated immune cells become resistant to subsequent exposure to T suppressor factor (capable of inhibiting transfer of immunity to normal recipients). A cyclophosphamide-sensitive, I-J+, Ly-2 T transducer cell is required in the immune donor cell population for contrasuppression to be induced by the TcsF plus specific antigen. These cells release an antigen-non-specific contrasuppressive factor capable of rendering immune targets, depleted of transducer cells, resistant to suppression (either by suppressor factor or in the tolerant recipient). The results indicate that contrasuppression in contact sensitivity is antigen specific and that the balance of suppression and contrasuppression determines tolerance vs responsiveness in this system. The symmetrical resemblance of the contrasuppressive interactions to those of suppression in contact sensitivity are discussed.     

A splenic requirement for the generation of suppressor T cells.

Tolerance to contact sensitization with DNFB may be induced by DNBSO3. This specific unresponsiveness may occur via one or both of two mechanisms--production of suppressor T cells or clone inhibition. We investigated the role of the spleen in this unresponsiveness. Splenectomized mice may be tolerized by i.v. injection of DNBSO3, but they are incapable of serving as donors of lymph node cells for transfer of tolerance to normal recipients. Kinetic studies indicated that the spleen must be present at least three days after tolerization in order to permit development of a significant number of suppressor cells in the peripheral lymph nodes. We interpret these results to indicate that 1) clone inhibition does not require the spleen, 2) the generation of suppressor T cells is dependent on the presence of the spleen, and 3) it is likely that tolerogens in this system induce suppressor cells in the spleen and some of these cells or their products leave the spleen to reach the peripheral lymph nodes.     

Specific suppressor T cells in rats active in the afferent phase of contact hypersensitivity

The optimal conditions for the induction of contact hypersensitivity in rats and the characteristics of its suppression were studied using the sensitizing haptens dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) and trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB). The hypersensitivity was shown to be hapten specific in so far as TNCB did not sensitize for DNFB responses but sensitization with DNFB did allow a marginal response in rats challenged with TNCB. Suppression of the sensitization to DNFB and TNCB could be generated by intravenous injection of dinitrobenzenesulphonic acid (DNBS) or trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid (TNBS), respectively, up to 3 weeks before sensitization. This suppression was hapten specific and could be transferred with splenic T cells enriched for lymphocytes carrying the OX8 (Tc/s) cell marker. Only the induction phase of sensitization, however, could be suppressed in that way. No suppression acting upon the effector phase could be detected except for a nonspecific local suppression at the site of a previous challenge with an antigen to which the rat was specifically suppressed. This study shows that suppression of contact hypersensitivity in rats is mediated by specific suppressor T cells of which the activation pathway apparently differs from that postulated for mice.     

Desensitization of contact allergy to DNFB in mice. I. Description of a model system

We investigated the down-regulation of contact sensitivity (desensitization) in mice sensitized to DNFB. Mice were sensitized with DNFB, desensitized with antigen 2 wk later, and resensitized 2 wk after desensitization. Large doses of antigen (DNFB or DNBSO3) produced about 50% inhibition of the anamnestic response as measured by ear swelling after challenge with DNFB. Desensitization was antigen specific and long lasting. Lymph node cells from desensitized mice showed diminished antigen-induced proliferation in vitro. Although the anamnestic response can be inhibited by afferent- or efferent-acting suppressor cells, such suppressor cells were not demonstrated in desensitized animals. The most likely explanation is that antigen desensitizes by inactivating effector cells for contact sensitivity, although suppressor mechanisms have not been completely excluded.     

Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. V. Induction of tolerance with DNP compounds and with free and membrane-associated DNFB.

Immunologic unresponsiveness (tolerance) was induced in a mouse model of contact sensitization to DNFB. The ability to induce tolerance varied with the chemical reactivity of the tolerogen; DNFB was highly tolerogenic, DNBSO3 was moderately tolerogenic, and DNP-lysine was not tolerogenic. Although DNFB is considered a highly reactive compound, tracer studies of injected DNFB showed that it was rapidly excreted. Further studies were therefore done with DNFB attached to mouse erythrocytes. Tolerance to DNFB-RBC was highly specific in vivo; mice tolerant to DNFB showed normal reactivity to TNCB (picryl chloride.) Cells of mice tolerant to DNFB-RBC were also unresponsive to DNBSO3 in vitro. Tolerance to DNFB, DNBSO3, and DNFB-RBC all required time to develop, suggesting that an active process was involved.     

Inhibition of specific immune responses by feeding protein antigens. IV. Evidence for tolerance and specific active suppression of cell-mediated immune responses to ovalbumin.

We studied the effect of a single intragastric administration of ovalbumin (OVA) on the subsequent development of OVA-specific cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses in BDF1 mice. In animals fed OVA 7 days before subcutaneous sensitization with OVA-CFA, we observed a concomitant dose-dependent decrease in both the humoral and CMI responses specific for OVA. The CMI tolerance was found to be antigen-specific when assayed in vivo by ear swelling or in vitro by an antigen-induced T cell proliferation assay because OVA-fed mice responded normally to sensitization with horse gamma-globulin. It was also shown that either spleen or lymph node cells, but not serum, from OVA-fed donors transferred suppression to normal recipients. The transfer was mediated by antigen-specific suppressor T cells (Ts) that appeared to inhibit the induction phase (afferent limb) of the CMI response, since the Ts were only effective when transferred before or shortly after the onset of sensitization.     

Requirements for induction of T cell tolerance to DNFB: efficiency of membrane-associated DNFB.

Tolerance to contact sensitization with DNFB, a T cell-dependent phenomenon, was induced in mice by preparations of DNFB coupled to mouse RBC or spleen cells. Such tolerance is dose related, wanes with time, and can be transferred to normal animals with lymphoid cells (presumably containing suppressors). Tolerance to DNFB-RBC can be produced by whole DNFB-RBC, by ghosts of these cells, by sonicates of the ghosts, and by detergent-treated DNFB-RBC ghosts. Tolerance cannot be produced by larger amounts of DNFB-RBC components not associated with membrane. The ability of various DNP compounds to stimulate DNA synthesis in DNFB-sensitized cells also correlates with their ability to bind to protein components; i.e., DNFB is a far more efficient stimulator than DNBSO, whereas DNPlysine does not stimulate at all. Thus, the ability to sensitize or to tolerize with DNFB congeners is related to their ability to couple to proteins. It appears that the active induction of T cell tolerance requires that tolerogen be coupled to cell membranes. Since both T cell sensitization and tolerance to DNFB are best produced by DNFB-membrane, the actual occurrence of one state or the other must depend on the molecular method of "presentation" of DNFB-membrane.     

Oral administration of hapten inhibits in vivo induction of specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cells mediating tissue inflammation: a role for regulatory CD4+ T cells

We investigated whether oral tolerance could block the development of an inflammatory response mediated by CD8+ T cells, using a mouse model of oral tolerance of contact sensitivity (CS) to the hapten 2, 4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB). In this system, the skin inflammatory response is initiated by hapten-specific class I-restricted cytotoxic CD8+ T (CTL) cells, independently of CD4 help. Oral delivery of DNFB before skin sensitization blocked the CS response by impairing the development of DNFB-specific CD8+ effector T cells in secondary lymphoid organs. This was shown by complete inhibition of DNFB-specific CTL and proliferative responses of CD8+ T cells, lack of specific IFN-gamma-producing CD8+ T cells, and inability of CD8+ T cells to transfer CS in RAG20/0 mice. RT-PCR and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed that recruitment of CD8+ effectors of CS in the skin at the site of hapten challenge was impaired in orally tolerized mice. Sequential anti-CD4 Ab treatment showed that only depletion of CD4+ T cells during the afferent phase of CS abrogated oral tolerance induction by restoring high numbers of specific CD8+ effectors in lymphoid organs, whereas CD4 depletion during the efferent phase of CS did not affect oral tolerance. These data demonstrate that a single intragastric administration of hapten can block in vivo induction of DNFB-specific CD8+ CTL responsible for tissue inflammation and that a subset of regulatory CD4+ T cells mediate oral tolerance by inhibiting expansion of specific CD8+ effectors in lymph nodes.     

The induction of tolerance to DNFB contact sensitivity by using hapten-modified lymphoid cells. III. Effects of hapten concentration on the ability of MLS-disparate cells to induce rapid unresponsiveness

We investigated genetic restrictions in the induction of immediate tolerance to DNFB contact sensitivity in mice. Using spleen cells from various donor strains haptenated at 500 micro M DNFB, we were unable to detect any restrictions in tolerance induction in recipients that were either syngeneic or allogeneic to the donor strain. However, if the concentration of hapten used in the in vitro labeling was decreased (from 500 micro M to 2.5 to 5 micro M DNFB), differences in tolerogenesis between the various donor strain haplotypes were found. Haptenated spleen cells labeled with 5 micro M DNFB produced a profound level of unresponsiveness in allogeneic recipients but produced minimal tolerance in syngeneic animals. This tolerant state was shown to be antigen-specific and was not produced by unmodified allogeneic cells alone. Further genetic analysis demonstrated that an efficient tolerant state was produced when the donor of the tolerogen and recipient differed at the MLS locus rather than at either the MHC or minor regions. This phenomenon required viable, Thy 1-bearing cells in the haptenated donor population for efficient tolerogenesis to DNFB contact sensitivity.     

Nature of hapten-modified determinants involved in induction of T cell tolerance and suppressor T cells to NDFB contact sensitivity

Unresponsiveness to DNFB contact sensitivity induced by DNP-modified lymphoid cells (DNP-LC) is mediated by two separable pathways: a rapidly induced, long lasting inhibition of reactive T cell clones (donor tolerance), and a transient period of suppressor T cell (Ts) activity. The present report has examined the nature of the hapten-modified determinants responsible for the induction of these pathways by utilizing soluble DNP-LC cell lysate preparations as tolerogens. The results indicate that both DNP-modified MHC and non-MHC encoded determinants can mediate donor tolerance 7 days after tolerization. On the other hand, the induction of Ts requires DNP-modified MHC determinants, since DNP-LC lysates passed over lentil lectin or specific anti-H-2 immunoabsorbent columns lost their ability to induce Ts. Additional experiments showed that the injection of DNP-LC lysate compatible with the recipient strain at the H-2K and H-2D region of the MHC was sufficient for the induction of Ts. We propose that Ts induction involves the direct presentation of DNP-H-2 determinants to Ts precursors, whereas the induction of donor tolerance may involve host processing and presentation of DNP-modified membrane determinants in conjunction with host MHC structures.     

Induced suppression of the efferent phase of contact sensitivity in rats

A study of the immunosuppressive systems of rats has been conducted with special attention to whether suppressor cells can be induced to down-regulate the efferent limb of contact sensitivity. Contact sensitivity (CS)1 was induced in DA rats 5 days after immunization with trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB). Intravenous pretreatment of naive rats with TNP-coupled syngeneic spleen cells 7 days before sensitization suppressed the induction of CS by 60%. Suppression of the inductive phase of CS could be transferred adoptively into syngeneic rats with spleen cells of such tolerized animals. Cell fractionation studies showed the OX8+ (CD8) T cell population (cytotoxic/suppressor) was responsible for the suppression in the afferent phase of CS. Such cells were incapable of suppressing preexisting CS. To investigate whether suppression could be induced for the efferent phase, spleen and peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) from rats tolerized by administering TNP-spleen cells iv plus epidermal paintings with TNCB were adoptively transferred into recipients sensitized 4 days earlier. Both spleen cells and PEC suppressed the efferent phase of CS but PEC did so more efficiently. Separation of splenic cells revealed the suppressors to be CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, separation of PEC into plastic adherent and nonadherent cells showed the nonadherent (T cell enriched) cells to be noneffective alone. The adherent subpopulation conveyed suppression but did so more effectively upon addition of the T cells. Thus, T cells and macrophages may operate in concert to achieve suppression of the efferent limb of CS. PEC from tolerized rats suppressed performed CS of any specificity but only after the suppressor cells were triggered with the same antigen that induced them. Since both the afferent and efferent phases of CS have now been shown to be suppressable, two separate suppressor mechanisms may be operable in rats.     

Soluble factors in tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. VIII. Regulation of T suppressor cell function by autoreactive T helper cells

When cultured with DNP-labeled I-A+ cells, Lyt 2+ T suppressor cells (Ts) from 2,4,-dinitrobenzene sulfonate (DNBS)-tolerized mice are activated to synthesize and release a suppressor factor (SSF) which suppresses the transfer of contact sensitivity to DNFB. The signals required to activate the DNBS-primed Ts to produce SSF were studied in greater detail. As previously observed with fixed DNP-labeled spleen cell stimulators, the supernatants from cultures of DNBS-primed spleen cells and glutaraldehyde-fixed DNP-labeled P388D1 cell monolayers did not contain SSF. When the tolerant cells were harvested from these monolayers and were treated with IL-1, the Ts released the synthesized SSF. Synthesis and release of SSF required Ts recognition of DNP/class I MHC on the hapten-presenting cells followed by interaction with the costimulator IL-1. When the tolerant cells were cultured with fixed DNP-labeled I-A+ or I-A- stimulators to induce SSF synthesis, release was induced by adding either unlabeled or TNP-labeled unprimed spleen cells to the cultures. The release of SSF was blocked when the second stimulators were pretreated with anti-I-A antibody but not with anti-DNP or anti-class I MHC antibodies. These results indicate that the release of SSF by DNBS-primed Lyt 2+ Ts is regulated by the activity of a self-I-A-reactive (i.e., autoreactive) T cell in the tolerant spleen cell population.