Hereditary spastic paraplegia SPG13 is associated with a mutation in the gene encoding the mitochondrial chaperonin Hsp60

SPG13, an autosomal dominant form of pure hereditary spastic paraplegia, was recently mapped to chromosome 2q24-34 in a French family. Here we present genetic data indicating that SPG13 is associated with a mutation, in the gene encoding the human mitochondrial chaperonin Hsp60, that results in the V72I substitution. A complementation assay showed that wild-type HSP60 (also known as "HSPD1"), but not HSP60 (V72I), together with the co-chaperonin HSP10 (also known as "HSPE1"), can support growth of Escherichia coli cells in which the homologous chromosomal groESgroEL chaperonin genes have been deleted. Taken together, our data strongly indicate that the V72I variation is the first disease-causing mutation that has been identified in HSP60.     

Role of the chaperonin cofactor Hsp10 in protein folding and sorting in yeast mitochondria

Protein folding in mitochondria is mediated by the chaperonin Hsp60, the homologue of E. coli GroEL. Mitochondria also contain a homologue of the cochaperonin GroES, called Hsp10, which is a functional regulator of the chaperonin. To define the in vivo role of the co- chaperonin, we have used the genetic and biochemical potential of the yeast S. cerevisiae. The HSP10 gene was cloned and sequenced and temperature-sensitive lethal hsp10 mutants were generated. Our results identify Hsp10 as an essential component of the mitochondrial protein folding apparatus, participating in various aspects of Hsp60 function. Hsp10 is required for the folding and assembly of proteins imported into the matrix compartment, and is involved in the sorting of certain proteins, such as the Rieske Fe/S protein, passing through the matrix en route to the intermembrane space. The folding of the precursor of cytosolic dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), imported into mitochondria as a fusion protein, is apparently independent of Hsp10 function consistent with observations made for the chaperonin-mediated folding of DHFR in vitro. The temperature-sensitive mutations in Hsp10 map to a domain (residues 25-40) that corresponds to a previously identified mobile loop region of bacterial GroES and result in a reduced binding affinity of hsp10 for the chaperonin at the non-permissive temperature.     

The human mitochondrial Hsp60 in the APO conformation forms a stable tetradecameric complex

The human mitochondrial chaperonin is a macromolecular machine that catalyzes the proper folding of mitochondrial proteins and is of vital importance to all cells. This chaperonin is composed of 2 distinct proteins, Hsp60 and Hsp10, that assemble into large oligomeric complexes that mediate the folding of non-native polypeptides in an ATP dependent manner. Here, we report the bacterial expression and purification of fully assembled human Hsp60 and Hsp10 recombinant proteins and that Hsp60 forms a stable tetradecameric double-ring conformation in the absence of co-chaperonin and nucleotide. Evidence of the stable double-ring conformation is illustrated by the 15 Å resolution electron microscopy reconstruction presented here. Furthermore, our biochemical analyses reveal that the presence of a non-native substrate initiates ATP-hydrolysis within the Hsp60/10 chaperonin to commence protein folding. Collectively, these data provide insight into the architecture of the intermediates used by the human mitochondrial chaperonin along its protein folding pathway and lay a foundation for subsequent high resolution structural investigations into the conformational changes of the mitochondrial chaperonin.     

A Single-Ring Mitochondrial Chaperonin (Hsp60-Hsp10) Can Substitute for GroEL-GroES In Vivo

Chaperonins participate in the facilitated folding of a variety of proteins in vivo. To see whether the same spectrum of target proteins can be productively folded by the double-ring prokaryotic chaperonin GroEL-GroES and its single-ring human mitochondrial homolog, Hsp60-Hsp10, we expressed the latter in an Escherichia coli strain engineered so that the groE operon is under strict regulatory control. We found that expression of Hsp60-Hsp10 restores viability to cells that no longer express GroEL-GroES, formally demonstrating that Hsp60-Hsp10 can carry out all essential in vivo functions of GroEL-GroES.     

Overexpression of yeast Hsp110 homolog Sse1p suppresses ydj1-151 thermosensitivity and restores Hsp90-dependent activity

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae heat-shock protein (Hsp)40, Ydj1p, is involved in a variety of cellular activities that control polypeptide fate, such as folding and translocation across intracellular membranes. To elucidate the mechanism of Ydj1p action, and to identify functional partners, we screened for multicopy suppressors of the temperature-sensitive ydj1-151 mutant and identified a yeast Hsp110, SSE1. Overexpression of Sse1p also suppressed the folding defect of v-Src kinase in the ydj1-151 mutant and partially reversed the alpha-factor translocation defect. SSE1-dependent suppression of ydj1-151 thermosensitivity required the wild-type ATP-binding domain of Sse1p. However, the Sse1p mutants maintained heat-denatured firefly luciferase in a folding-competent state in vitro and restored human androgen receptor folding in sse1 mutant cells. Because the folding of both v-Src kinase and human androgen receptor in yeast requires the Hsp90 complex, these data suggest that Ydj1p and Sse1p are interacting cochaperones in the Hsp90 complex and facilitate Hsp90-dependent activity.     

Hsp60-independent protein folding in the matrix of yeast mitochondria.

Proteins that are imported from the cytosol into mitochondria cross the mitochondrial membranes in an unfolded conformation and then fold in the matrix. Some of these proteins require the chaperonin hsp60 for folding. To test whether hsp60 is required for the folding of all imported matrix proteins, we monitored the folding of four monomeric proteins after import into mitochondria from wild-type yeast or from a mutant strain in which hsp60 had been inactivated. The four precursors included two authentic matrix proteins (rhodanese and the mitochondrial cyclophilin Cpr3p) and two artificial precursors (matrix-targeted variants of dihydrofolate reductase and barnase). Only rhodanese formed a tight complex with hsp60 and required hsp60 for folding. The three other proteins folded efficiently without, and showed no detectable binding to, hsp60. Thus, the mitochondrial chaperonin system is not essential for the folding of all matrix proteins. These data agree well with earlier in vitro studies, which had demonstrated that only a subset of proteins require chaperones for efficient folding.     

TRiC/CCT cooperates with different upstream chaperones in the folding of distinct protein classes

The role in protein folding of the eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT is only partially understood. Here, we show that a group of WD40 beta-propeller proteins in the yeast cytosol interact transiently with TRiC upon synthesis and require the chaperonin to reach their native state. TRiC cooperates in the folding of these proteins with the ribosome-associated heat shock protein (Hsp)70 chaperones Ssb1/2p. In contrast, newly synthesized actin and tubulins, the major known client proteins of TRiC, are independent of Ssb1/2p and instead use the co-chaperone GimC/prefoldin for efficient transfer to the chaperonin. GimC can replace Ssb1/2p in the folding of WD40 substrates such as Cdc55p, but combined deletion of SSB and GIM genes results in loss of viability. These findings expand the substrate range of the eukaryotic chaperonin by a structurally defined class of proteins and demonstrate an essential role for upstream chaperones in TRiC-assisted folding.     

Identification of Elements That Dictate the Specificity of Mitochondrial Hsp60 for Its Co-Chaperonin

Type I chaperonins (cpn60/Hsp60) are essential proteins that mediate the folding of proteins in bacteria, chloroplast and mitochondria. Despite the high sequence homology among chaperonins, the mitochondrial chaperonin system has developed unique properties that distinguish it from the widely-studied bacterial system (GroEL and GroES). The most relevant difference to this study is that mitochondrial chaperonins are able to refold denatured proteins only with the assistance of the mitochondrial co-chaperonin. This is in contrast to the bacterial chaperonin, which is able to function with the help of co-chaperonin from any source. The goal of our work was to determine structural elements that govern the specificity between chaperonin and co-chaperonin pairs using mitochondrial Hsp60 as model system. We used a mutagenesis approach to obtain human mitochondrial Hsp60 mutants that are able to function with the bacterial co-chaperonin, GroES. We isolated two mutants, a single mutant (E321K) and a double mutant (R264K/E358K) that, together with GroES, were able to rescue an E. coli strain, in which the endogenous chaperonin system was silenced. Although the mutations are located in the apical domain of the chaperonin, where the interaction with co-chaperonin takes place, none of the residues are located in positions that are directly responsible for co-chaperonin binding. Moreover, while both mutants were able to function with GroES, they showed distinct functional and structural properties. Our results indicate that the phenotype of the E321K mutant is caused mainly by a profound increase in the binding affinity to all co-chaperonins, while the phenotype of R264K/E358K is caused by a slight increase in affinity toward co-chaperonins that is accompanied by an alteration in the allosteric signal transmitted upon nucleotide binding. The latter changes lead to a great increase in affinity for GroES, with only a minor increase in affinity toward the mammalian mitochondrial co-chaperonin.     

Dominant gain-of-function mutations in Hsp104p reveal crucial roles for the middle region

Heat-shock protein 104 (Hsp104p) is a protein-remodeling factor that promotes survival after extreme stress by disassembling aggregated proteins and can either promote or prevent the propagation of prions (protein-based genetic elements). Hsp104p can be greatly overexpressed without slowing growth, suggesting tight control of its powerful protein-remodeling activities. We isolated point mutations in Hsp104p that interfere with this control and block cell growth. Each mutant contained alterations in the middle region (MR). Each of the three MR point mutations analyzed in detail had distinct phenotypes. In combination with nucleotide binding site mutations, Hsp104p(T499I) altered bud morphology and caused septin mislocalization, colocalizing with the misplaced septins. Point mutations in the septin Cdc12p suppressed this phenotype, suggesting that it is due to direct Hsp104p-septin interactions. Hsp104p(A503V) did not perturb morphology but stopped cell growth. Remarkably, when expressed transiently, the mutant protein promoted survival after extreme stress as effectively as did wild-type Hsp104p. Hsp104p(A509D) had no deleterious effects on growth or morphology but had a greatly reduced ability to promote thermotolerance. That mutations in an 11-amino acid stretch of the MR have such profound and diverse effects suggests the MR plays a central role in regulating Hsp104p function.     

Mitochondrial Heat Shock Protein (Hsp) 70 and Hsp10 Cooperate in the Formation of Hsp60 Complexes

Mitochondrial Hsp70 (mtHsp70) mediates essential functions for mitochondrial biogenesis, like import and folding of proteins. In these processes, the chaperone cooperates with cochaperones, the presequence translocase, and other chaperone systems. The chaperonin Hsp60, together with its cofactor Hsp10, catalyzes folding of a subset of mtHsp70 client proteins. Hsp60 forms heptameric ring structures that provide a cavity for protein folding. How the Hsp60 rings are assembled is poorly understood. In a comprehensive interaction study, we found that mtHsp70 associates with Hsp60 and Hsp10. Surprisingly, mtHsp70 interacts with Hsp10 independently of Hsp60. The mtHsp70-Hsp10 complex binds to the unassembled Hsp60 precursor to promote its assembly into mature Hsp60 complexes. We conclude that coupling to Hsp10 recruits mtHsp70 to mediate the biogenesis of the heptameric Hsp60 rings.     

Acquisition of heat shock tolerance by regulation of intracellular redox states

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a mild heat treatment strongly induces Hsp104p which provides acquisition of thermotolerance. The mechanism by which Hsp104p protects cells from the severe heat shock has not yet been completely elucidated. In this study, a pivotal role of Hsp104p as an efficient scavenger of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) is investigated. In our previous study, we reported that Hsp104p acted as a regulator in the mitochondrial respiration pathway. In this report, the recombinant wild-type and hypersensitive ras mutants (ira2Delta) with the extrachromosomal plasmids wild-type and mutant hsp104 genes were studied. The resulting strains successfully expressed both wild-type and mutant Hsp104p and showed the thermotolerance phenotype in the strain with the functional wild-type Hsp104p expressed. Upon treatment with H2O2 and menadione, the strains with the functional Hsp104p expressed showed higher survival rates than the other mutants, indicating the protective role of Hsp104p from the oxidative stress. Fluorescence measurement of the oxidation-dependent probe, 2',7'-dichlorofluoroscein diacetate (H2DCFDA), also indicated that Hsp104p significantly reduced the amount of ROS. Resistance to the oxidative stress was independent of the amount of the glutathione in the hyperactivated ras mutants. Taken all together, this study confirms that Hsp104p plays a crucial role in keeping cells from being damaged by the oxidative stress, thus acting as a modulator of the intracellular redox state.     

Cyclophilin 20 is involved in mitochondrial protein folding in cooperation with molecular chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp60.

We studied the role of mitochondrial cyclophilin 20 (CyP20), a peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, in preprotein translocation across the mitochondrial membranes and protein folding inside the organelle. The inhibitory drug cyclosporin A did not impair membrane translocation of preproteins, but it delayed the folding of an imported protein in wild-type mitochondria. Similarly, Neurospora crassa mitochondria lacking CyP20 efficiently imported preproteins into the matrix, but folding of an imported protein was significantly delayed, indicating that CyP20 is involved in protein folding in the matrix. The slow folding in the mutant mitochondria was not inhibited by cyclosporin A. Folding intermediates of precursor molecules reversibly accumulated at the molecular chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp60 in the matrix. We conclude that CyP20 is a component of the mitochondrial protein folding machinery and that it cooperates with Hsp70 and Hsp60. It is speculated that peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerases in other cellular compartments may similarly promote protein folding in cooperation with chaperone proteins.     

PhLP3 modulates CCT-mediated actin and tubulin folding via ternary complexes with substrates

Many ATP-dependent molecular chaperones, including Hsp70, Hsp90, and the chaperonins GroEL/Hsp60, require cofactor proteins to regulate their ATPase activities and thus folding functions in vivo. One conspicuous exception has been the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT, for which no regulator of its ATPase activity, other than non-native substrate proteins, is known. We identify the evolutionarily conserved PhLP3 (phosducin-like protein 3) as a modulator of CCT function in vitro and in vivo. PhLP3 binds CCT, spanning the cylindrical chaperonin cavity and contacting at least two subunits. When present in a ternary complex with CCT and an actin or tubulin substrate, PhLP3 significantly diminishes the chaperonin ATPase activity, and accordingly, excess PhLP3 perturbs actin or tubulin folding in vitro. Most interestingly, however, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PhLP3 homologue is required for proper actin and tubulin function. This cellular role of PhLP3 is most apparent in a strain that also lacks prefoldin, a chaperone that facilitates CCT-mediated actin and tubulin folding. We propose that the antagonistic actions of PhLP3 and prefoldin serve to modulate CCT activity and play a key role in establishing a functional cytoskeleton in vivo.     

A chaperonin subunit with unique structures is essential for folding of a specific substrate

Type I chaperonins are large, double-ring complexes present in bacteria (GroEL), mitochondria (Hsp60), and chloroplasts (Cpn60), which are involved in mediating the folding of newly synthesized, translocated, or stress-denatured proteins. In Escherichia coli, GroEL comprises 14 identical subunits and has been exquisitely optimized to fold its broad range of substrates. However, multiple Cpn60 subunits with different expression profiles have evolved in chloroplasts. Here, we show that, in Arabidopsis thaliana, the minor subunit Cpn60β4 forms a heterooligomeric Cpn60 complex with Cpn60α1 and Cpn60β1-β3 and is specifically required for the folding of NdhH, a subunit of the chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase-like complex (NDH). Other Cpn60β subunits cannot complement the function of Cpn60β4. Furthermore, the unique C-terminus of Cpn60β4 is required for the full activity of the unique Cpn60 complex containing Cpn60β4 for folding of NdhH. Our findings suggest that this unusual kind of subunit enables the Cpn60 complex to assist the folding of some particular substrates, whereas other dominant Cpn60 subunits maintain a housekeeping chaperonin function by facilitating the folding of other obligate substrates.     

The importance of a mobile loop in regulating chaperonin/ co-chaperonin interaction: humans versus Escherichia coli

Chaperonins are universally conserved proteins that nonspecifically facilitate the folding of a wide spectrum of proteins. While bacterial GroEL is functionally promiscuous with various co-chaperonin partners, its human homologue, Hsp60 functions specifically with its co-chaperonin partner, Hsp10, and not with other co-chaperonins, such as the bacterial GroES or bacteriophage T4-encoded Gp31. Co-chaperonin interaction with chaperonin is mediated by the co-chaperonin mobile loop that folds into a beta-hairpin conformation upon binding to the chaperonin. A delicate balance of flexibility and conformational preferences of the mobile loop determines co-chaperonin affinity for chaperonin. Here, we show that the ability of Hsp10, but not GroES, to interact specifically with Hsp60 lies within the mobile loop sequence. Using mutational analysis, we show that three substitutions in the GroES mobile loop are necessary and sufficient to acquire Hsp10-like specificity. Two of these substitutions are predicted to preorganize the beta-hairpin turn and one to increase the hydrophobicity of the GroEL-binding site. Together, they result in a GroES that binds chaperonins with higher affinity. It seems likely that the single ring mitochondrial Hsp60 exhibits intrinsically lower affinity for the co-chaperonin that can be compensated for by a higher affinity mobile loop.     

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rot1p is an ER-localized membrane protein that may function with BiP/Kar2p in protein folding

The 70-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp70) family of molecular chaperones cooperates with cofactors to promote protein folding, assembly of protein complexes and translocation of proteins across membranes. Although many cofactors of cytosolic Hsp70s have been identified, knowledge about cofactors of BiP/Kar2p, an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident Hsp70, is still poor. Here we propose the Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein Rot1p as a possible cofactor of BiP/Kar2p involved in protein folding. Rot1p was found to be an essential, ER-localized membrane protein facing the lumen. ROT1 genetically interacted with several ER chaperone genes including KAR2, and the rot1-2 mutation triggered the unfolded protein response. Rot1p associated with Kar2p, especially under conditions of ER stress, and maturation of a model protein, a reduced form of carboxypeptidaseY, was impaired in a kar2-1 rot1-2 double mutant. These findings suggest that Rot1p participates in protein folding with Kar2p. Morphological analysis of rot1-2 cells revealed cell wall defects and accumulation of autophagic bodies in the vacuole. This implies that the protein folding machinery in which Rot1p is involved chaperones proteins acting in various physiological processes including cell wall synthesis and lysis of autophagic bodies.