Strong nucleosomes of mouse genome including recovered centromeric sequences

Recently discovered strong nucleosomes (SNs) characterized by visibly periodical DNA sequences have been found to concentrate in centromeres of Arabidopsis thaliana and in transient meiotic centromeres of Caenorhabditis elegans. To find out whether such affiliation of SNs to centromeres is a more general phenomenon, we studied SNs of the Mus musculus. The publicly available genome sequences of mouse, as well as of practically all other eukaryotes do not include the centromere regions which are difficult to assemble because of a large amount of repeat sequences in the centromeres and pericentromeric regions. We recovered those missing sequences using the data from MNase-seq experiments in mouse embryonic stem cells, where the sequence of DNA inside nucleosomes, including missing regions, was determined by 100-bp paired-end sequencing. Those nucleosome sequences, which are not matching to the published genome sequence, would largely belong to the centromeres. By evaluating SN densities in centromeres and in non-centromeric regions, we conclude that mouse SNs concentrate in the centromeres of telocentric mouse chromosomes, with ~3.9 times excess compared to their density in the rest of the genome. The remaining non-centromeric SNs are harbored mainly by introns and intergenic regions, by retro-transposons, in particular. The centromeric involvement of the SNs opens new horizons for the chromosome and centromere structure studies.     

Comparisons of recombination frequencies in hybrids involving telocentric and bibrachial wheat chromosomes

Telosomic stocks have been extensively used to map genes to chromosome arms and to determine gene-to-centromere genetic distances. It has been suggested that if a chromosome arm is present as a telosome, recombination frequencies will be drastically reduced in the centromeric region. However, previous studies have not considered the bias in recombination estimates due to selection against aneuploid gametes produced by failure of pairing at the first meiotic division. Formulas are derived here for adjusting recombination estimates for this bias. Adjusted recombination frequencies between markers located on both sides of the centromeres are analyzed in three different pairs of wheat (Triticum aestivum) isogenic segregating populations involving bibrachial and telocentric chromosomes. Recombination frequencies estimated from crosses involving telocentric chromosomes were not significantly different from recombination frequencies estimated from isogenic crosses involving bibrachial chromosomes. The implications of the present findings for karyotype evolution, and specifically for Robertsonian fissions and fusions, are discussed. Received: 10 March 1999 / Accepted: 17 June 1999     

Recombination Suppression by Heterozygous Robertsonian Chromosomes in the Mouse

Robertsonian chromosomes are metacentric chromosomes formed by the joining of two telocentric chromosomes at their centromere ends. Many Robertsonian chromosomes of the mouse suppress genetic recombination near the centromere when heterozygous. We have analyzed genetic recombination and meiotic pairing in mice heterozygous for Robertsonian chromosomes and genetic markers to determine (1) the reason for this recombination suppression and (2) whether there are any consistent rules to predict which Robertsonian chromosomes will suppress recombination. Meiotic pairing was analyzed using synaptonemal complex preparations. Our data provide evidence that the underlying mechanism of recombination suppression is mechanical interference in meiotic pairing between Robertsonian chromosomes and their telocentric partners. The fact that recombination suppression is specific to individual Robertsonian chromosomes suggests that the pairing delay is caused by minor structural differences between the Robertsonian chromosomes and their telocentric homologs and that these differences arise during Robertsonian formation. Further understanding of this pairing delay is important for mouse mapping studies. In 10 mouse chromosomes (3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15 and 19) the distances from the centromeres to first markers may still be underestimated because they have been determined using only Robertsonian chromosomes. Our control linkage studies using C-band (heterochromatin) markers for the centromeric region provide improved estimates for the centromere-to-first-locus distance in mouse chromosomes 1, 2 and 16.     

Terminal regions of wheat chromosomes select their pairing partners in meiosis

Many plant species, including important crops like wheat, are polyploids that carry more than two sets of genetically related chromosomes capable of meiotic pairing. To safeguard a diploid-like behavior at meiosis, many polyploids evolved genetic loci that suppress incorrect pairing and recombination of homeologues. The Ph1 locus in wheat was proposed to ensure homologous pairing by controlling the specificity of centromere associations that precede chromosome pairing. Using wheat chromosomes that carry rye centromeres, we show that the centromere associations in early meiosis are not based on homology and that the Ph1 locus has no effect on such associations. Although centromeres indeed undergo a switch from nonhomologous to homologous associations in meiosis, this process is driven by the terminally initiated synapsis. The centromere has no effect on metaphase I chiasmate chromosome associations: homologs with identical or different centromeres, in the presence and absence of Ph1, pair the same. A FISH analysis of the behavior of centromeres and distal chromomeres in telocentric and bi-armed chromosomes demonstrates that it is not the centromeric, but rather the subtelomeric, regions that are involved in the correct partner recognition and selection.     

Identification and designation of telocentric chromosomes in barley by means of Giemsa N-banding technique

Summary Seven complete chromosomes and nine telocentric chromosomes in telotrisomics of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) were identified and designated by an improved Giemsa N-banding technique. Karyotype analysis and Giemsa N-banding patterns of complete and telocentric chromosomes at somatic late prophase, prometaphase and metaphase have shown the following results: Chromosome 1 is a median chromosome with a long arm (Telo 1L) carrying a centromeric band, while short arm (Telo 1S) has a centromeric band and two intercalary bands. Chromosome 2 is the longest in the barley chromosome complement. Both arms show a centromeric band, an intercalary band and two faint dots on each chromatid at middle to distal regions. The banding pattern of Telo 2L (a centromeric and an intercalary band) and Telo 2S (a centromeric, two intercalary and a terminal band) corresponded to the banding pattern of the long and short arm of chromosome 2. Chromosome 3 is a submedian chromosome and its long arm is the second longest in the barley chromosome complement. Telo 3L has a centromeric (fainter than Telo 3S) and an intercalary band. It also shows a faint dot on each chromatid at distal region. Telo 3S shows a dark centromeric band only. Chromosome 4 is the most heavily banded one in barley chromosome complement. Both arms showed a dark centromeric band. Three dark intercalary bands and faint telomeric dot were observed in the long arm (4L), while two dark intercalary bands in the short arm (4S) were arranged very close to each other and appeared as a single large band in metaphase chromosomes. A faint dot was observed in each chromatid at the distal region in the 4S. Chromosome 5 is the smallest chromosome, which carries a centromeric band and an intercalary band on the long arm. Telo 5L, with a faint centromeric band and an intercalary band, is similar to the long arm. Chromosomes 6 and 7 are satellited chromosomes showing mainly centromeric bands. Telo 6S is identical to the short arm of chromosome 6 with a centromeric band. Telo 3L and Telo 4L were previously designated as Telo 3S and Telo 4S based on the genetic/linkage analysis. However, from the Giemsa banding pattern it is evident that these telocentric chromosomes are not correctly identified and the linkage map for chromosome 3 and 4 should be reversed. One out of ten triple 2S plants studied showed about 50% deficiency in the distal portion of the short arm. Telo 4L also showed a deletion of the distal euchromatic region of the long arm. This deletion (32%) may complicate genetic analysis, as genes located on the deficient segment would show a disomic ratio. It has been clearly demonstrated that the telocentric chromosomes of barley carry half of the centromere. Banding pattern polymorphism was attributed, at least partly, to the mitotic stages and differences in techniques.Contribution from the Department of Agronomy and published with the approval of the Director of the Colorado State University Experiment Station as Scientific Series Paper No. 2730. This research was supported in part by the USDA/SEA Competitive Research Grant 5901-0410-9-0334-0, USDA/ SEA-CSU Cooperative Research Grant 12-14-5001-265 and Colorado State University Hatch Project. This paper was presented partly at the Fourth International Barley Genetics Symposium, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 22–29, 1981     

Molecular-cytogenetic characterization of a higher plant centromere/kinetochore complex

The centromeric region of a telocentric field bean chromosome that resulted from centric fission of the metacentric satellite chromosome was microdissected. The DNA of this region was amplified and biotinylated by degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR)/linker-adapter PCR. After fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) the entire chromosome complement of Vicia faba was labelled by these probes except for the nucleolus organizing region (NOR) and the interstitial heterochromatin, the chromosomes of V. sativa and V. narbonensis were only slightly labelled by the same probes. Dense uniform labelling was also observed when a probe amplified from a clearly delimited microdissected centromeric region of a mutant of Tradescantia paludosa was hybridized to T. paludosa chromosomes. Even after six cycles of subtractive hybridization between DNA fragments amplified from centromeric and acentric regions no sequences specifically located at the field bean centromeres were found among the remaining DNA. A mouse antiserum was produced which detected nuclear proteins of 33 kDa and 68 kDa; these were predominantly located at V. faba kinetochores during mitotic metaphase. DNA amplified from the chromatin fraction adsorbed by this serum out of the sonicated total mitotic chromatin also did not cause specific labelling of primary constrictions. From these results we conclude: (1) either centromere-specific DNA sequences are not very conserved among higher plants and are — at least in species with large genomes — intermingled with complex dispersed repetitive sequences that prevent the purification of the former, or (2) (some of) the dispersed repeats themselves specify the primary constrictions by stereophysical parameters rather than by their base sequence.     

Cytological and molecular analysis of centromere misdivision in maize.

B chromosome derivatives suffering from breaks within their centromere were examined cytologically and molecularly. We showed by high resolution FISH that misdivision of the centromere of a univalent chromosome can occur during meiosis. The breaks divide the centromere repeat sequence cluster. A telocentric chromosome formed by misdivision was found to have the addition of telomeric repeats to the broken centromere. A ring chromosome formed after misdivision occurred by fusion of the broken centromere to the telomere. Pulsed-field electrophoresis analyses were performed on the telocentric and ring chromosomes to identify fragments that hybridize to both the telomeric repeat and the B-specific centromeric repeat. We conclude that healing of broken maize centromeres can be achieved through the mechanisms of addition or fusion of telomeric repeat sequences to the broken centromere.     

Robertsonian metacentrics of the house mouse lose telomeric sequences but retain some minor satellite DNA in the pericentromeric area

A combination of cytogenetic and molecular biology techniques were used to study the molecular composition and organisation of the pericentromeric regions of house mouse metacentric chromosomes, the products of Robertsonian (Rb) translocations between telocentrics. Regardless of whether mitotic or meiotic preparations were used, in situ hybridisation failed to reveal pericentromeric telomeric sequences on any of the Rb chromosomes, while all metacentrics retained detectable, although reduced (average 50 kb), amounts of minor satellite DNA in the vicinity of their centromeres. These results were supported by slot blot hybridisation which indicated that mice with 2n=22 Rb chromosomes have 65% of telomeric sequences (which are allocated to the distal telomeres of both Rb and telocentric chromosomes and to the proximal telomeres of telocentrics) and 15% the amount of minor satellite, compared with mice with 2n=40 all-telocentric chromosomes. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis and Southern analysis of DNA from Rb mice showed that the size of the telomeric arrays is similar to that of mice with all-telocentric chromosomes and that the minor satellite sequences were hybridising to larger fragments incorporating major satellite DNA. Since the telomeric sequences are closer to the physical end of the chromosome than the minor satellite sequences, the absence of telomeric sequences and the reduced amount of minor satellite sequences at the pericentromeric region of the Rb metacentrics suggest that the breakpoints for the Rb translocation occur very close to the minor satellite-major satellite border. Moreover, it is likely that the minor satellite is required for centromeric function, 50–67 kb being enough DNA to organise one centromere with a functionally active kinetochore.     

The compact Brachypodium genome conserves centromeric regions of a common ancestor with wheat and rice

The evolution of five chromosomes of Brachypodium distachyon from a 12-chromosome ancestor of all grasses by dysploidy raises an interesting question about the fate of redundant centromeres. Three independent but complementary approaches were pursued to study centromeric region homologies among the chromosomes of Brachypodium, wheat, and rice. The genes present in pericentromeres of the basic set of seven chromosomes of wheat and the Triticeae, and the 80 rice centromeric genes spanning the CENH3 binding domain of centromeres 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8 were used as “anchor” markers to identify centromere locations in the B. distachyon chromosomes. A total of 53 B. distachyon bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones anchored by wheat pericentromeric expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were used as probes for BAC-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of B. distachyon mitotic chromosomes. Integrated sequence alignment and BAC-FISH data were used to determine the approximate positions of active and inactive centromeres in the five B. distachyon chromosomes. The following syntenic relationships of the centromeres for Brachypodium (Bd), rice (R), and wheat (W) were evident: Bd1-R6, Bd2-R5-W1, Bd3-R10, Bd4-R11-W4, and Bd5-R4. Six rice centromeres syntenic to five wheat centromeres were inactive in Brachypodium chromosomes. The conservation of centromere gene synteny among several sets of homologous centromeres of three species indicates that active genes can persist in ancient centromeres with more than 40 million years of shared evolutionary history. Annotation of a BAC contig spanning an inactive centromere in chromosome Bd3 which is syntenic to rice Cen8 and W7 pericentromeres, along with BAC FISH data from inactive centromeres revealed that the centromere inactivation was accompanied by the loss of centromeric retrotransposons and turnover of centromere-specific satellites during Bd chromosome evolution.     

Somatic association of telocentric chromosomes carrying homologous centromeres in common wheat

Summary Measurements of distances between telocentric chromosomes, either homologous or representing the opposite arms of a metacentric chromosome (complementary telocentrics), were made at metaphase in root tip cells of common wheat carrying two homologous pairs of complementary telocentrics of chromosome 1 B or 6 B (double ditelosomic 1 B or 6 B). The aim was to elucidate the relative locations of the telocentric chromosomes within the cell. The data obtained strongly suggest that all four telocentrics of chromosome 1 B or 6 B are spacially and simultaneously co-associated. In plants carrying two complementary (6 B ^S and 6 B ^L) and a non-related (5 B ^L) telocentric, only the complementary chromosomes were found to be somatically associated. It is thought, therefore, that the somatic association of chromosomes may involve more than two chromosomes in the same association and, since complementary telocentrics are as much associated as homologous, that the homology between centromeres (probably the only homologous region that exists between complementary telocentrics) is a very important condition for somatic association of chromosomes. The spacial arrangement of chromosomes was studied at anaphase and prophase and the polar orientation of chromosomes at prophase was found to resemble anaphase orientation. This was taken as good evidence for the maintenance of the chromosome arrangement — the Rabl orientation — and of the peripheral location of the centromere and its association with the nuclear membrane. Within this general arrangement homologous telocentric chromosomes were frequently seen to have their centromeres associated or directed towards each other. The role of the centromere in somatic association as a spindle fibre attachment and chromosome binder is discussed. It is suggested that for non-homologous chromosomes to become associated in root tips, the only requirement needed should be the homology of centromeres such as exists between complementary telocentrics, or, as a possible alternative, common repeated sequences of DNA molecules around the centromere region.Dedicated to Professor Dr. Marcus M. Rhoades on his 70th birthday.     

Plasmodium falciparum centromeres display a unique epigenetic makeup and cluster prior to and during schizogony

Centromeres are essential for the faithful transmission of chromosomes to the next generation, therefore being essential in all eukaryotic organisms. The centromeres of Plasmodium falciparum, the causative agent of the most severe form of malaria, have been broadly mapped on most chromosomes, but their epigenetic composition remained undefined. Here, we reveal that the centromeric histone variant PfCENH3 occupies a 4–4.5 kb region on each P. falciparum chromosome, which is devoid of pericentric heterochromatin but harbours another histone variant, PfH2A.Z. These CENH3 covered regions pinpoint the exact position of the centromere on all chromosomes and revealed that all centromeric regions have similar size and sequence composition. Immunofluorescence assay of PfCENH3 strongly suggests that P. falciparum centromerescluster to a single nuclear location prior to and during mitosis and cytokinesis but dissociate soon after invasion. In summary, we reveal a dynamic association of Plasmodium centromeres, which bear a unique epigenetic signature and conform to a strict structure. These findings suggest that DNA‐associated and epigenetic elements play an important role in centromere establishment in this important human pathogen.     

Molecular mapping of the centromeres of tomato chromosomes 7 and 9

The centromeres of two tomato chromosomes have been precisely localized on the molecular linkage map through dosage analysis of trisomic stocks. To map the centromeres of chromosomes 7 and 9, complementary telo-, secondary, and tertiary trisomic stocks were used to assign DNA markers to their respective chromosome arms and thus to localize the centromere at the junction of the short and long arms. It was found that both centromeres are situated within a cluster of cosegregating markers. In an attempt to order the markers within the centric clusters, genetic maps of the centromeric regions of chromosomes 7 and 9 were constructed from F₂ populations of 1620Lycopersicon esculentum × L. pennellii (E × P) plants and 1640L. esculentum × L. pimpinellifolium (E × PM) plants. Despite the large number of plants analyzed, very few recombination events were detected in the centric regions, indicating a significant suppression of recombination at this region of the chromosome. The fact that recombination suppression is equally strong in crosses between closely related (E × PM) and remotely related (E × P) parents suggests that centromeric suppression is not due to DNA sequence mismatches but to some other mechanism. The greatest number of centromeric markers was resolved in theL. esculentum × L. pennellii F₂ population. The centromere of chromosome 7 is surrounded by eight cosegregating markers: three on the short arm, five on the long arm. Similarly, the centric region of chromosome 9 contains ten cosegregating markers including one short arm marker and nine long arm markers. The localization of centromeres to precise intervals on the molecular linkage map represents the first step towards the characterization and ultimate isolation of tomato centromeres.     

Karyotypes of the most primitive catfishes (Teleostei: Siluriformas: Diplomystidae)

Karyotypes of Diplomystes composensis and Diplomystes nahuelbutaensis were the same diploid number (n= 56).The chromosome formula for D. composensis was 16 metacentric + 24 submetacentric + 8 subtelocentric + 8 telocentric chromosomes and for D. nahuelbutaensis was 14 metacentric + 26 submetacentric + 8 subtelocentric +8 telocentric chromosomes. In contrast, the differences in the chromosomal C-banding patterns between these species was large. For instance, chromosome pairs 5,6, and 7 of D. nahuelbutaensis showed heterochromatic centromeres and pairs 23, 24, 27, and 28 were entirely heterochromotic. Diplomystes composensis showed conspicuous C-banded blocks in pairs 7, 24, and 25 (chromosome pair 7 had one heterochromatic arm, chromosome pair 24 was entirely heterochromatic, and chromosome pair 25 had heterochromatin close to centromere). Comparison with other ostariophysan karyotypes (e.g. gymnotiforms, characiforms, and cypriniforms), does not allow any conclusions about the ploesiomorphic catfish condition, because the karyotypes of the outgroups are too variable. A synapomorphy shared by characiforms, gymnotiforms, and diplomystid catfishes is the presence of more metacentric to submetacentric than substelocentric to telocentric chromosomes. Cypriniforms are more primitive because they have more subtelocentric to telocentric than metacentric to submetacentric chromosomes.     

Strong nucleosomes reside in meiotic centromeres of C. elegans

Recently discovered strong nucleosomes (SNs) are characterized by strongly periodical DNA sequence, with visible rather than hidden sequence periodicity. In a quest for possible functions of the SNs, it has been found that the SNs concentrate within centromere regions of A. thaliana chromosomes . They, however, have been detected in Caenorhabditis elegans as well, although the holocentric chromosomes of this species do not have centromeres. Scrutinizing the SNs of C. elegans and their distributions along the DNA sequences of the chromosomes, we have discovered that the SNs are located mainly at the ends of the chromosomes of C. elegans. This suggests that, perhaps, the ends of the chromosomes fulfill some function(s) of centromeres in this species, as also indicated by the cytogenetic studies on meiotic chromosomes in spermatocytes of C. elegans, where the end-to-end association is observed. The centromeric involvement of the SNs, also found in A. thaliana, opens new horizons for the chromosome and centromere structure studies.     

Centromeric DNA characterization in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon provides insights on the evolution of the genus

Brachypodium distachyon is a well‐established model monocot plant, and its small and compact genome has been used as an accurate reference for the much larger and often polyploid genomes of cereals such as Avena sativa (oats), Hordeum vulgare (barley) and Triticum aestivum (wheat). Centromeres are indispensable functional units of chromosomes and they play a core role in genome polyploidization events during evolution. As the Brachypodium genus contains about 20 species that differ significantly in terms of their basic chromosome numbers, genome size, ploidy levels and life strategies, studying their centromeres may provide important insight into the structure and evolution of the genome in this interesting and important genus. In this study, we isolated the centromeric DNA of the B. distachyon reference line Bd21 and characterized its composition via the chromatin immunoprecipitation of the nucleosomes that contain the centromere‐specific histone CENH3. We revealed that the centromeres of Bd21 have the features of typical multicellular eukaryotic centromeres. Strikingly, these centromeres contain relatively few centromeric satellite DNAs; in particular, the centromere of chromosome 5 (Bd5) consists of only ~40 kb. Moreover, the centromeric retrotransposons in B. distachyon (CRBds) are evolutionarily young. These transposable elements are located both within and adjacent to the CENH3 binding domains, and have similar compositions. Moreover, based on the presence of CRBds in the centromeres, the species in this study can be grouped into two distinct lineages. This may provide new evidence regarding the phylogenetic relationships within the Brachypodium genus.     

Meiotic Disjunction of Homologs in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Is Directed by Pairing and Recombination of the Chromosome Arms but Not by Pairing of the Centromeres

We explored the behavior of meiotic chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by examining the effects of chromosomal rearrangements on the pattern of disjunction and recombination of chromosome III during meiosis. The segregation of deletion chromosomes lacking part or all (telocentric) of one arm was analyzed in the presence of one or two copies of a normal chromosome III. In strains containing one normal and any one deletion chromosome, the two chromosomes disjoined in most meioses. In strains with one normal chromosome and both a left and right arm telocentric chromosome, the two telocentrics preferentially disjoined from the normal chromosome. Homology on one arm was sufficient to direct chromosome disjunction, and two chromosomes could be directed to disjoin from a third. In strains containing one deletion chromosome and two normal chromosomes, the two normal chromosomes preferentially disjoined, but in 4-7% of the tetrads the normal chromosomes cosegregated, disjoining from the deletion chromosome. Recombination between the two normal chromosomes or between the deletion chromosome and a normal chromosome increased the probability that these chromosomes would disjoin, although cosegregation of recombinants was observed. Finally, we observed that a derivative of chromosome III in which the centromeric region was deleted and CEN5 was integrated at another site on the chromosome disjoined from a normal chromosome III with fidelity. These studies demonstrate that it is not pairing of the centromeres, but pairing and recombination along the arms of the homologs, that directs meiotic chromosome segregation.     

Deposition,turnover, and release of CENH3 at <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis</Emphasis> centromeres

The kinetochore is a complex multiprotein structure located at centromeres and required for the proper segregation of chromosomes during mitosis and meiosis. An important role in kinetochore assembly and function plays the centromeric histone H3 variant (CENH3). Cell cycle stage of CENH3 deposition to centromeres varies between different organisms. We confirmed by in vivo studies that deposition of Arabidopsis CENH3 takes place at centromeres during G2 and demonstrated that additionally a low turnover of CENH3 occurs along the cell cycle, apparently for replacement of damaged protein. Furthermore, enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP)-CENH3 of photobleached chromocenters is not replaced by EYFP-CENH3 molecules from unbleached centromeres of the same nucleus, indicating a stable incorporation of CENH3 into centromeric nucleosomes. In differentiated endopolyploid nuclei however, the amount of CENH3 at centromeres declines with age.     

C-band distribution,DNA content and base composition inAdoxa moschatellina (Adoxaceae), a plant with cold-sensitive chromosome segments

The chromosomes ofAdoxa moschatellina (2n = 36, paleo-4x) contain mostly terminal, occasionally intercalary, negatively heteropycnotic cold-induced regions which correspond to all major C-bands including the satellites, as revealed by sequential analysis. Positively C-stained are also centromeres, the dotlike arms of the 7 telocentric chromosome pairs, and some very narrow intercalary bands; their cold-sensitivity is hardly traceable. There exists a fraction of condensed interphase chromatin, at least after chilling, which is virtually not C-banded (possibly condensed euchromatin).The DNA amount is 14.3 pg (1 C). The heterochromatin content is 13.0%. The thermal melting profile (Tm corresponding to 38.6% GC) does not reveal a particular AT- or GC-rich fraction. Significantly, the heterochromatin respond to the Hy-banding procedure is neutral.The distribution of cold-sensitive regions in plants was analysed with the arm-frame method: Intercalary positions, clearly, are not especially favoured regions. The obvious deficiency at centromeric positions may depend on the action of natural selection against mechanically labile centromeric regions.Dedicated to Univ.-Prof. Dr.Lothar Geitler on the occasion of his 80th birthday.     

Two types of constitutive heterochromatin in the chromosomes of some Fritillaria species

A Giemsa banding technique has been used to study C-banding in mitotic chromosomes in root tips of Fritillaria graeca, F. crassifolia and F. rhodocanakis, all diploids (2n=24) belonging to the graeca group. In the first two the C-bands were of two types, diverging in respect of staining regularly and specifically within chromosomes. In one type it was weak, being intermediate between that of intensely stained ones, representing the other class, and the euchromatin. In F. graeca the pale bands were proximally localized and confined to 5 pairs, whereas in F. crassifolia they occurred only in the 4 M chromosomes, in each within the centromeric constriction as a large inclusion. The interphase nuclei of both species contained pale and heavily stained chromocentres. No pale ones occurred in such nuclei of F. rhodocanakis. The probability is discussed that the two classes of C-band represent distinct types of heterochromatin, differing both in respect of condensation throughout the whole mitotic cycle and in the repetitive DNA sequences they most likely contain. In all 3 species pairs of Giemsa-positive centromeric dots, representing the centromeres, were masked both by proximally or centromerically localized bands, irrespective of the class of heterochromatin they represented.