Membrane protein folding and oligomerization: the two-stage model.

We discuss the view that the folding of many, perhaps most, integral membrane proteins can be considered as a two-stage process. In stage I, hydrophobic alpha-helices are established across the lipid bilayer. In stage II, they interact to form functional transmembrane structures. This model is suggested by the nature of transmembrane segments in known structures, refolding experiments, the assembly of integral membrane protein from fragments, and the existence of very small integral membrane protein subunits. It may extend to proteins with a variety of functions, including the formation of transmembrane aqueous channels. The model is discussed in the context of the forces involved in membrane protein folding and the interpretation of sequence data.     

Recognition of alpha-helix transmembrane domains with an amphipathy scale generated by molecular dynamics using only the primary sequence of proteins

We recently developed an amphipathy scale, elaborated from molecular dynamics data that can be used for the identification of hydrophobic or hydrophilic regions in proteins. This amphipathy scale reflects side chain/water molecule interaction energies. We have now used this amphipathy scale to find candidates for transmembrane segments, by examining a large sample of membrane proteins with alpha-helix segments. The candidates were selected based on an amphipathy coefficient value range and the minimum number of residues in a segment. We compared our results with the transmembrane segments previously identified in the PDB_TM database by the TMDET algorithm. We expected that the hydrophobic segments would be identified using only the primary structures of the proteins and the amphipathy scale. However, some of these hydrophobic segments may pertain to hydrophobic pockets not included in transmembrane regions. We found that our amphipathy scale could identify alpha-helix transmembrane regions with a probability of success of 76% when all segments were included and 90% when all membrane proteins were included.     

Orientational preferences of neighboring helices can drive ER insertion of a marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helix

α-helical integral membrane proteins critically depend on the correct insertion of their transmembrane α helices into the lipid bilayer for proper folding, yet a surprisingly large fraction of the transmembrane α helices in multispanning integral membrane proteins are not sufficiently hydrophobic to insert into the target membrane by themselves. How can such marginally hydrophobic segments nevertheless form transmembrane helices in the folded structure? Here, we show that a transmembrane helix with a strong orientational preference (N(cyt)-C(lum) or N(lum)-C(cyt)) can both increase and decrease the hydrophobicity threshold for membrane insertion of a neighboring, marginally hydrophobic helix. This effect helps explain the "missing hydrophobicity" in polytopic membrane proteins.     

UMARS: Un-MAppable Reads Solution

Background

Few high-resolution structures of integral membranes proteins are available, as crystallization of such proteins needs yet to overcome too many technical limitations. Nevertheless, prediction of their transmembrane (TM) structure by bioinformatics tools provides interesting insights on the topology of these proteins.

Methods

We describe here how to extract new information from the analysis of hydrophobicity variations or hydrophobic pulses (HPulses) in the sequence of integral membrane proteins using the Hydrophobic Pulse Predictor, a new tool we developed for this purpose. To analyze the primary sequence of 70 integral membrane proteins we defined two levels of analysis: G1-HPulses for sliding windows of n = 2 to 6 and G2-HPulses for sliding windows of n = 12 to 16.

Results

The G2-HPulse analysis of 541 transmembrane helices allowed the definition of the new concept of transmembrane unit (TMU) that groups together transmembrane helices and segments with potential adjacent structures. In addition, the G1-HPulse analysis identified helix irregularities that corresponded to kinks, partial helices or unannotated structural events. These irregularities could represent key dynamic elements that are alternatively activated depending on the channel status as illustrated by the crystal structures of the lactose permease in different conformations.

Conclusions

Our results open a new way in the understanding of transmembrane secondary structures: hydrophobicity through hydrophobic pulses strongly impacts on such embedded structures and is not confined to define the transmembrane status of amino acids.     

Membrane protein insertase YidC in bacteria and archaea

The insertion of proteins into the prokaryotic plasma membrane is catalyzed by translocases and insertases. On one hand, the Sec translocase operates as a transmembrane channel that can open laterally to first bind and then release the hydrophobic segments of a substrate protein into the lipid bilayer. On the other hand, YidC insertases interact with their substrates in a groove‐like structure at an amphiphilic protein–lipid interface thus allowing the transmembrane segments of the substrate to slide into the lipid bilayer. The recently published high‐resolution structures of YidC provide new mechanistic insights of how transmembrane proteins achieve the transition from an aqueous environment in the cytoplasm to the hydrophobic lipid bilayer environment of the membrane.     

Retinal proteins as model systems for membrane protein folding

Experimental folding studies of membrane proteins are more challenging than water-soluble proteins because of the higher hydrophobicity content of membrane embedded sequences and the need to provide a hydrophobic milieu for the transmembrane regions. The first challenge is their denaturation: due to the thermodynamic instability of polar groups in the membrane, secondary structures in membrane proteins are more difficult to disrupt than in soluble proteins. The second challenge is to refold from the denatured states. Successful refolding of membrane proteins has almost always been from very subtly denatured states. Therefore, it can be useful to analyze membrane protein folding using computational methods, and we will provide results obtained with simulated unfolding of membrane protein structures using the Floppy Inclusions and Rigid Substructure Topography (FIRST) method. Computational methods have the advantage that they allow a direct comparison between diverse membrane proteins. We will review here both, experimental and FIRST studies of the retinal binding proteins bacteriorhodopsin and mammalian rhodopsin, and discuss the extension of the findings to deriving hypotheses on the mechanisms of folding of membrane proteins in general. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Retinal Proteins—You can teach an old dog new tricks.     

Positioning of proteins in membranes: a computational approach

A new computational approach has been developed to determine the spatial arrangement of proteins in membranes by minimizing their transfer energies from water to the lipid bilayer. The membrane hydrocarbon core was approximated as a planar slab of adjustable thickness with decadiene-like interior and interfacial polarity profiles derived from published EPR studies. Applicability and accuracy of the method was verified for a set of 24 transmembrane proteins whose orientations in membranes have been studied by spin-labeling, chemical modification, fluorescence, ATR FTIR, NMR, cryo-microscopy, and neutron diffraction. Subsequently, the optimal rotational and translational positions were calculated for 109 transmembrane, five integral monotopic and 27 peripheral protein complexes with known 3D structures. This method can reliably distinguish transmembrane and integral monotopic proteins from water-soluble proteins based on their transfer energies and membrane penetration depths. The accuracies of calculated hydrophobic thicknesses and tilt angles were approximately 1 A and 2 degrees, respectively, judging from their deviations in different crystal forms of the same proteins. The hydrophobic thicknesses of transmembrane proteins ranged from 21.1 to 43.8 A depending on the type of biological membrane, while their tilt angles with respect to the bilayer normal varied from zero in symmetric complexes to 26 degrees in asymmetric structures. Calculated hydrophobic boundaries of proteins are located approximately 5 A lower than lipid phosphates and correspond to the zero membrane depth parameter of spin-labeled residues. Coordinates of all studied proteins with their membrane boundaries can be found in the Orientations of Proteins in Membranes (OPM) database:http://opm.phar.umich.edu/.     

Hydrophobic free energy eigenfunctions of pore, channel, and transporter proteins contain beta-burst patterns.

Hydropathy plots are often used in place of missing physical data to model transmembrane proteins that are difficult to crystallize. The sequential maxima of their graphs approximate the number and locations of transmembrane segments, but potentially useful additional information about sequential hydrophobic variation is lost in this smoothing procedure. To explore a broader range of hydrophobic variations without loss of the transmembrane segment-relevant sequential maxima, we utilize a sequence of linear decompositions and transformations of the n-length hydrophobic free energy sequences, Hi, i = 1...n, of proteins. Constructions of hydrophobic free energy eigenfunctions, psil, from M-lagged, M x M autocovariance matrices, CM, were followed by their all-poles, maximum entropy power spectral, Somega(psil), and Mexican Hat wavelet, Wa,b(psil), transformations. These procedures yielded graphs indicative of inverse frequencies, omega-1, and sequence locations of hydrophobic modes suggestive of secondary and supersecondary protein structures. The graphs of these computations discriminated between Greek Key, Jelly Role, and Up and Down categories of antiparallel beta-barrel proteins. With these methods, examples of porins, connexins, hexose transporters, nuclear membrane proteins, and potassium but not sodium channels appear to belong to the Up and Down antiparallel beta-barrel variety.     

OPM: orientations of proteins in membranes database

SUMMARY: The Orientations of Proteins in Membranes (OPM) database provides a collection of transmembrane, monotopic and peripheral proteins from the Protein Data Bank whose spatial arrangements in the lipid bilayer have been calculated theoretically and compared with experimental data. The database allows analysis, sorting and searching of membrane proteins based on their structural classification, species, destination membrane, numbers of transmembrane segments and subunits, numbers of secondary structures and the calculated hydrophobic thickness or tilt angle with respect to the bilayer normal. All coordinate files with the calculated membrane boundaries are available for downloading. AVAILABILITY: http://opm.phar.umich.edu.     

Position-dependence of stabilizing polar interactions of asparagine in transmembrane helical bundles

Recent studies with model peptides and statistical analyses of the crystal structures of membrane proteins have shown that buried polar interactions contribute significantly to the stabilization of the three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins. Here, we probe how the location of these polar groups along the transmembrane helices affect their free energies of interaction. Asn residues were placed singly and in pairs at three positions within a model transmembrane helix, which had previously been shown to support the formation of trimers in micelles. The model helix was designed to form a transmembrane coiled coil, with Val side chains at the "a" positions of the heptad repeat. Variants of this peptide were prepared in which an Asn residue was introduced at one or more of the "a" positions, and their free energies of association were determined by analytical ultracentrifugation. When placed near the middle of the transmembrane helix, the formation of trimers was stabilized by at least -2.0 kcal/mol per Asn side chain. When the Asn was placed at the interface between the hydrophobic and polar regions of the peptide, the substitution was neither stabilizing nor destabilizing (0.0 +/- 0.5 kcal/mol of monomer). Finally, it has previously been shown that a Val-for-Asn mutation in a water-soluble coiled coil destabilizes the structure by approximately 1.5 kcal/mol of monomer [Acharya, A., et al. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 14122-14131]. Thus, the headgroup region of a micelle appears to have a conformational impact intermediate between that of bulk water and the apolar region of micelle. A similarly large dependence on the location of the polar residues was found in a statistical survey of helical transmembrane proteins. The tendency of different types of residues to be buried in the interiors versus being exposed to lipids was analyzed. Asn and Gln show a very strong tendency to be buried when they are located near the middle of a transmembrane helix. However, when placed near the ends of transmembrane helices, they show little preference for the surface versus the interior of the protein. These data show that Asn side chains within the apolar region of the transmembrane helix provide a significantly larger driving force for association than Asn residues near the apolar/polar interface. Thus, although polar interactions are able to strongly stabilize the folding of membrane proteins, the energetics of association depend on their location within the hydrophobic region of a transmembrane helix.     

Anchoring proteins to Escherichia coli cell membranes using hydrophobic anchors derived from a Bacillus subtilis integral membrane protein

Anchored periplasmic expression (APEx) technology aims to express and localize proteins or peptides in the Escherichia coli periplasm. Some reports have suggested that transmembrane segments of integral membrane proteins can be used as membrane anchors in the APEx system. In this study, a series of hydrophobic anchors derived from the first putative transmembrane helix of a Bacillus subtilis integral membrane protein, MrpF, and its truncated forms were investigated for anchored periplasmic expression of alkaline phosphatase (PhoA) in E. coli. Anchoring efficiency of hydrophobic anchors was evaluated by monitoring the expression and activity of anchored PhoA. The length of hydrophobic anchors was found to be critical for anchoring proteins to cell membranes. This study may open new avenues for applying transmembrane segments derived from native membrane proteins as membrane anchors in the APEx system.     

Sequence context and modified hydrophobic moment plots help identify 'horizontal' surface helices in transmembrane protein structure prediction

Transmembrane proteins make up at least one-fifth of the genome of most organisms and are critical components of key pathways for cell survival and interactions with the environment. The function of helices found at the membrane surface in transmembrane proteins has not been greatly explored, but it is likely that they play an ancillary role to membrane spanning helices and are analogous to the surface active helices of peripheral membrane proteins, being involved in: lipid association, membrane perturbation, transmembrane signal transduction and regulation, and transmembrane helical bundle formation. Due to the difficulties in obtaining high-resolution structural data for this class of proteins, structure-from-sequence predictive methods continue to be developed as a means to obtain structural models for these largely intractable systems. A simple but effective variant of the hydrophobic moment analysis of amino acid sequences is described here as part of a protocol for distinguishing helical sequences that are parallel to or 'horizontal' at the membrane bilayer/aqueous phase interface from helices that are membrane-embedded or located in extra-membranous domains. This protocol when tested on transmembrane spanning protein amino acid sequences not used in its development, was found to be 84-91% accurate when the results were compared to the partition locations in the corresponding structures determined by X-ray crystallography, and 72% accurate in determining which helices lie horizontal or near horizontal at the lipid interface.     

Predicting the solvent accessibility of transmembrane residues from protein sequence

In this study, we propose a novel method to predict the solvent accessible surface areas of transmembrane residues. For both transmembrane alpha-helix and beta-barrel residues, the correlation coefficients between the predicted and observed accessible surface areas are around 0.65. On the basis of predicted accessible surface areas, residues exposed to the lipid environment or buried inside a protein can be identified by using certain cutoff thresholds. We have extensively examined our approach based on different definitions of accessible surface areas and a variety of sets of control parameters. Given that experimentally determining the structures of membrane proteins is very difficult and membrane proteins are actually abundant in nature, our approach is useful for theoretically modeling membrane protein tertiary structures, particularly for modeling the assembly of transmembrane domains. This approach can be used to annotate the membrane proteins in proteomes to provide extra structural and functional information.     

Efficient glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) modification of membrane proteins requires a C-terminal anchoring signal of marginal hydrophobicity

Many plasma membrane proteins are anchored to the membrane via a C-terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) moiety. The GPI anchor is attached to the protein in the endoplasmic reticulum by transamidation, a reaction in which a C-terminal GPI-attachment signal is cleaved off concomitantly with addition of the GPI moiety. GPI-attachment signals are poorly conserved on the sequence level but are all composed of a polar segment that includes the GPI-attachment site followed by a hydrophobic segment located at the very C terminus of the protein. Here, we show that efficient GPI modification requires that the hydrophobicity of the C-terminal segment is "marginal": less hydrophobic than type II transmembrane anchors and more hydrophobic than the most hydrophobic segments found in secreted proteins. We further show that the GPI-attachment signal can be modified by the transamidase irrespective of whether it is first released into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum or is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.     

Detergent Properties Influence the Stability of the Glycophorin A Transmembrane Helix Dimer in Lysophosphatidylcholine Micelles

Detergents might affect membrane protein structures by promoting intramolecular interactions that are different from those found in native membrane bilayers, and fine-tuning detergent properties can be crucial for obtaining structural information of intact and functional transmembrane proteins. To systematically investigate the influence of the detergent concentration and acyl-chain length on the stability of a transmembrane protein structure, the stability of the human glycophorin A transmembrane helix dimer has been analyzed in lyso-phosphatidylcholine micelles of different acyl-chain length. While our results indicate that the transmembrane protein is destabilized in detergents with increasing chain-length, the diameter of the hydrophobic micelle core was found to be less crucial. Thus, hydrophobic mismatch appears to be less important in detergent micelles than in lipid bilayers and individual detergent molecules appear to be able to stretch within a micelle to match the hydrophobic thickness of the peptide. However, the stability of the GpA TM helix dimer linearly depends on the aggregation number of the lyso-PC detergents, indicating that not only is the chemistry of the detergent headgroup and acyl-chain region central for classifying a detergent as harsh or mild, but the detergent aggregation number might also be important.     

Polar/Ionizable Residues in Transmembrane Segments: Effects on Helix-Helix Packing

The vast majority of membrane proteins are anchored to biological membranes through hydrophobic α-helices. Sequence analysis of high-resolution membrane protein structures show that ionizable amino acid residues are present in transmembrane (TM) helices, often with a functional and/or structural role. Here, using as scaffold the hydrophobic TM domain of the model membrane protein glycophorin A (GpA), we address the consequences of replacing specific residues by ionizable amino acids on TM helix insertion and packing, both in detergent micelles and in biological membranes. Our findings demonstrate that ionizable residues are stably inserted in hydrophobic environments, and tolerated in the dimerization process when oriented toward the lipid face, emphasizing the complexity of protein-lipid interactions in biological membranes.     

Tetraspanin proteins as organisers of membrane microdomains and signalling complexes

Tetraspanins are a group of hydrophobic proteins with four transmembrane domains and two extracellular loops, both with conserved residues. Some tetraspanins are cell specific and others are very ubiquitous. Tetraspanins interact with very different types of proteins such as integrins, membrane receptors, as well as intracellular signalling molecules. Tetraspanins can interact with other tetraspanins to form a larger complex, whose core is formed by six tetraspanins, surrounded several tetraspanin-associated proteins. These complexes can further aggregate and behave as a membrane microdomain. The great heterogeneity in their composition and the dynamics of tetraspanin complexes confers great flexibility on these proteins to participate in many different biological roles.     

Asymmetric amino acid compositions of transmembrane beta-strands

In contrast to water-soluble proteins, membrane proteins reside in a heterogeneous environment, and their surfaces must interact with both polar and apolar membrane regions. As a consequence, the composition of membrane proteins' residues varies substantially between the membrane core and the interfacial regions. The amino acid compositions of helical membrane proteins are also known to be different on the cytoplasmic and extracellular sides of the membrane. Here we report that in the 16 transmembrane beta-barrel structures, the amino acid compositions of lipid-facing residues are different near the N and C termini of the individual strands. Polar amino acids are more prevalent near the C termini than near the N termini, and hydrophobic amino acids show the opposite trend. We suggest that this difference arises because it is easier for polar atoms to escape from the apolar regions of the bilayer at the C terminus of a beta-strand. This new characteristic of beta-barrel membrane proteins enhances our understanding of how a sequence encodes a membrane protein structure and should prove useful in identifying and predicting the structures of trans-membrane beta-barrels.     

Marginally hydrophobic transmembrane α‐helices shaping membrane protein folding

Cells have developed an incredible machinery to facilitate the insertion of membrane proteins into the membrane. While we have a fairly good understanding of the mechanism and determinants of membrane integration, more data is needed to understand the insertion of membrane proteins with more complex insertion and folding pathways. This review will focus on marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helices and their influence on membrane protein folding. These weakly hydrophobic transmembrane segments are by themselves not recognized by the translocon and therefore rely on local sequence context for membrane integration. How can such segments reside within the membrane? We will discuss this in the light of features found in the protein itself as well as the environment it resides in. Several characteristics in proteins have been described to influence the insertion of marginally hydrophobic helices. Additionally, the influence of biological membranes is significant. To begin with, the actual cost for having polar groups within the membrane may not be as high as expected; the presence of proteins in the membrane as well as characteristics of some amino acids may enable a transmembrane helix to harbor a charged residue. The lipid environment has also been shown to directly influence the topology as well as membrane boundaries of transmembrane helices—implying a dynamic relationship between membrane proteins and their environment.     

Structural features of transmembrane helices

A total of 160 transmembrane helices of 15 non-homologous high-resolution X-ray protein structures have been analyzed in respect of their structural features. The dihedral angles and hydrogen bonds of the helical sections that span the hydrophobic interior of the lipid bilayer have been investigated. The Ramachandran plot of protein channels and solute transporters exhibit a significant shift Delta (phi- and psi-angles) of Delta mean (+4.5 degrees and -5.4 degrees ), compared to a reference group of 151 alpha-helices of the same average length derived from water-soluble globular proteins. At the C-termini of transmembrane helices structural motifs equivalent to the Gly-caps of helices in globular proteins have been found, with two third of the transmembrane Gly-caps taking up a primary structure that is typically not found at helix termini exposed to a polar solvent. The structural particularities reported here are relevant for the three-dimensional modelling of membrane protein structures.