Screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis--a general practitioner's perspective.

The identification of the gene for cystic fibrosis has led to the possibility of population based screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis to identify couples at risk of having an affected child. Pilot studies have shown that screening is feasible and does not cause untoward anxiety, though the uptake of testing varies considerably with the setting and method of invitation. Screening offered at times when individuals (and health professionals) perceive it as directly relevant will probably gradually become established in the United Kingdom. This review examines the role of general practice in genetic carrier screening as exemplified by cystic fibrosis. General practice has a pivotal role from the beginning in providing individuals and couples with information, facilitating testing of patients'' relatives and of carriers identified by screening elsewhere (such as antenatal clinics), and offering testing in the context of reproduction. Screening for the cystic fibrosis gene will probably be followed by other genetic screening programmes.     

Active cascade testing for carriers of cystic fibrosis gene.

OBJECTIVE--To examine the acceptability, practicability, efficiency, and application of active screening for carriers of the cystic fibrosis gene in the extended families of those in whom the disease is present (Cascade screening). DESIGN--Paediatricians and physicians provide details of their affected patients, pedigrees are drawn up, and relatives offered tests after initial contact by the affected nuclear families. Affected patients are genotyped in a laboratory with a special interest in the genetics of cystic fibrosis. SETTING--North Western health region. SUBJECTS--Relatives and partners of 607 people with cystic fibrosis. INTERVENTIONS--Genetic counselling by letter for people found to be carriers; formal genetic counselling and when indicated arrangements for prenatal diagnosis for couples discovered to be carriers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Number of carrier couples detected; action in pregnancy of detected carrier couples; extent of the uptake of screening by relatives. RESULTS--Of 1563 relatives or partners tested, 15 carrier couples were detected; of nine pregnancies undertaken by these 15, eight had prenatal tests and three terminated pregnancies. An average of 16 people per family have come forward for testing so far. CONCLUSIONS--Cascade screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis is well accepted by relatives, especially on the mother''s side of the family; it is 10 times more efficient in detecting carrier couples than unfocused screening. Detected carrier couples make practical use of the information in pregnancy. Active cascade screening for carriers is effective in cystic fibrosis and widespread application is recommended. These principles could be applied to other recessive disorders.     

Involving consumers in the development of an educational program for cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Input from consumers of health care was sought in developing an educational program to be provided to individuals who are considering carrier testing for cystic fibrosis (CF). In addition, we assessed the ability of health professionals to predict consumers' priorities with regard to such information. A focus group of six middle school teachers formulated questions that they would ask in trying to decide whether they wanted carrier screening for CF. Then, other adults with (n = 39) and without (n = 60) a family history of CF were presented with the questions and were asked to select the questions in the order in which they would want them answered if offered the carrier test. After each question was answered, they were asked whether they would want the carrier test if it were offered to them. CF clinic staff, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors (n = 31) were asked to select the questions in the order in which they believed that an adult from the general population would want them answered. There were no differences in the order in which adults with and without a family history of CF would want questions answered. Consumers would want to learn about the carrier test as well as their risk of being a carrier and of having a child with CF, before receiving information on reproductive options and the effect that a child with CF would have on the family. Of the 44% of consumers who changed their mind about wanting screening during the course of selecting questions, 52% did so after the first question that they selected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Antenatal screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis: randomised trial of stepwise v couple screening.

OBJECTIVE--To perform a rigorous comparative evaluation of stepwise and couple approaches to antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. DESIGN--Pragmatic randomised trial. SETTING--Hospital antenatal clinic serving a regional population. SUBJECTS--2002 women (couples) attending for booking antenatal visit at less than 17 weeks'' gestation with no family history of cystic fibrosis. INTERVENTIONS--Offering counselling and carrier testing for cystic fibrosis, either to women in the first instance (stepwise) or to couples (couple screening). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Uptake rates; anxiety; knowledge of cystic fibrosis and carrier status (both partners); attitudes to health, pregnancy, the baby, and screening (both partners); and uptake of carrier testing by relatives. RESULTS--Uptake of screening was the same for both approaches (90%). After delivery most women remembered test results and their meaning, but 53/253 (21%) of those with negative results of couple testing had forgotten that repeat testing would be advisable if they had a pregnancy with a new partner. With stepwise screening women identified as carriers had high levels of anxiety when results were received (mean anxiety score 52.3). This dissipated with a reassuring partner''s result (carriers'' mean anxiety score 36.1) to levels similar to those receiving negative results from couple screening. Of those receiving negative results, women who had stepwise screening were significantly less anxious than those who had couple screening (mean score with result 32.1 v 35.4, 95% confidence interval for difference -4.7 to -2.1). CONCLUSIONS--Couple screening allows carriers to avoid transient high levels of anxiety, but is associated with more anxiety and false reassurance among most screenees who will test negative. Stepwise screening gives carriers and their relatives genetic information and is, in our opinion, the better method.     

Lack of interest by nonpregnant couples in population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

We used signs and letters to offer free cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening to nonpregnant adults in stable relationships who visited numerous clinical and nonclinical sites in Nashville. A total of 179 individuals (<<1% of those eligible) elected to be tested. To understand this observation, we used questionnaires to assess individuals' attitudes about genetic testing in general and about CF carrier screening in particular (n=873). Participants expressed conflicting views about carrier screening. More than 90% of people thought that genetic testing should at least be available. Most respondents said that the views of their partners and physicians were important in their decision making, and most believed that these others favored genetic testing. Yet, more than two-thirds indicated that such factors as insurability, being "at risk," what they would need to learn, abortion, and religious beliefs were important in their decision making, opinions that mitigated against genetic testing. In particular, one-third feared that carriers would lose their health insurance, one-quarter said that they would have been more interested had they been able to provide DNA by buccal swab rather than by finger stick, and less than one-sixth believed that genetic testing was meddling in God's plan. In the face of both the low level of use of free CF carrier screening by nonpregnant couples when it was not offered in person by health-care professionals and the wide variety of concerns demonstrated, we believe that clinicians should not routinely offer carrier screening to nonpregnant individuals who do not have a family history of CF.     

Uptake of cystic fibrosis testing in primary care: supply push or demand pull?

OBJECTIVE--To determine the acceptability and feasibility of screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis in a primary care setting. DESIGN--Follow up study over 15 months of patients offered carrier testing by mouthwash. SETTING--A general practice in inner London. SUBJECTS--5529 patients aged 18-45 invited by various methods and combinations of methods (letter, booklet, personal approach) for testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Uptake of screening, anxiety, and knowledge of test. RESULTS--957 (17%) invitees were screened over the 15 months. 28 carriers and no carrier couples were detected. Uptake rates were 12% (59/502 patients) among patients invited by letter and tested by appointment; 9% (47/496) among patients invited by letter, with leaflet, and tested by appointment; 4% (128/2953) among patients invited by letter six weeks before the end of the study and tested by appointment; 17% (81/471) among patients offered passive opportunistic testing; 70% (453/649) among patients offered active opportunistic testing; and 25% (22/88) among patients offered active opportunistic testing by appointment. A short term rise in anxiety among those given a positive test result had dissipated by three months. At three months about one fifth and one third of those given positive and negative results respectively did not understand their results correctly. CONCLUSION--These results suggest that the strongest variable in determining uptake of screening is the active approach by a health professional offering immediate testing. It remains to be resolved whether the high uptake rates achieved by active recruitment indicate a supply push for this new test rather than a demand from the population.     

Cystic fibrosis carrier population screening in the primary care setting.

To determine the receptivity of prenatal care providers and their patients to carrier testing for cystic fibrosis (CF), we offered free carrier screening, followed by genetic counseling of carriers, to all prenatal care providers in Rochester, NY, for all their female patients of reproductive age, pregnant or not. Of 124 prenatal care providers, only 37 elected to participate, but many of these offered screening only to pregnant women. The acceptance rate among pregnant women was approximately 57%. The most common reasons for accepting screening were to obtain reassurance (50.7%) and to avoid having a child with CF (27.8 %). The most common reasons for declining screening were not intending to terminate a pregnancy for CF (32.4%) and believing that the chance of having a CF child was very low (32.2%). Compared with decliners, acceptors were more likely to have no children, regarded having a child with CF as more serious, believed themselves more susceptible to having such a child, knew more about CF, would be more likely to terminate a pregnancy if the fetus were shown to have CF, and more strongly supported offering CF screening to women of reproductive age. Of 4,879 women on whom results were obtained, 124 were found to be carriers. Of these 124 carriers, the partners of 106 were tested. Of the five at-risk couples, four requested prenatal diagnosis and one requested neonatal diagnosis. No woman found to be a carrier whose partner tested negative requested prenatal diagnosis. Except for the imperfect knowledge of those testing negative, none of the adverse outcomes predicted for CF carrier testing in the general population were observed in this study.     

Cost effectiveness of antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE--To estimate the cost effectiveness of different antenatal screening programmes for cystic fibrosis. SETTING--Antenatal clinics and general practices in the United Kingdom. DESIGN--Four components of the screening process were identified: information giving, DNA testing, genetic counselling, and prenatal diagnosis. The component costs were derived from the literature and from a pilot screening study in Yorkshire. The cost of a given screening programme was then obtained by summing the components according to the specific screening strategy adopted (sequential and couple), the proportion of carriers detected by the DNA test, and the uptake of screening. Baseline assumptions were made about the proportion with missing information on carrier status from previous pregnancies (20%), the proportion changing partners between pregnancies (20%), and the uptake of prenatal diagnosis (100%). Sensitivity analysis was performed by varying these assumptions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Cost per affected pregnancy detected. RESULTS--Under the baseline assumptions sequential screening costs between pounds 40,000 and pounds 90,000 per affected pregnancy detected, depending on the carrier detection rate and uptake. Couple screening was more expensive, ranging from pounds 46,000 to pounds 104,000. From the sensitivity analysis a 10% change in the assumed proportion with missing information from a previous pregnancy alters the cost by pounds 4000; a 10% change in the proportion with new partners has a similar effect but only for couple screening; and cost will change directly in proportion to the uptake of prenatal diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS--While economic analysis cannot determine screening policy, the paper provides the NHS with the information on cost effectiveness needed to inform decisions on the introduction of a screening service for cystic fibrosis.     

Cystic fibrosis carrier testing in early pregnancy by general practitioners.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the feasibility of genetic counselling in general practice by using cystic fibrosis carrier screening at the booking appointment as an integral part of routine antenatal care and as a paradigm for the wider participation of general practitioners in medical genetics. DESIGN--Maternal testing (male partner tested only if woman screens positive) and couple testing for cystic fibrosis carrier status in the antenatal population attending one general practice and, later, in a further six (outreach) practices also. SETTING--Two partner urban training practice (pilot practice) in south Manchester, and six north west practices (two inner city, three urban, one rural dispensing). SUBJECTS--Total practice population of 50,000 (pilot practice plus six outreach practices) with an estimated 500-800 pregnancies per year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--(a) Proportion of carriers of cystic fibrosis identified, counselled, and appropriately managed within the first trimester of pregnancy; (b) questionnaire and interview measures of patient satisfaction and stress. RESULTS--Eleven carriers of cystic fibrosis were detected including one carrier couple. This carrier couple, after extensive counselling, elected to have prenatal diagnosis by chorionic villus biopsy. The fetus was homozygous normal. CONCLUSIONS--General practitioners can successfully integrate genetic counselling and cystic fibrosis carrier screening into the first antenatal booking appointment. When a carrier couple is identified clinical geneticists can help with the discussion of reproductive options, and prenatal diagnosis by chorionic villus biopsy can be completed within the first trimester. The results suggest that general practitioners will have an increasingly important role in medical genetics, subject to continuing evaluation of patient acceptability and stress.     

Cystic fibrosis heterozygote screening in 5,161 pregnant women.

A screening program for cystic fibrosis (CF) heterozygotes was conducted in a large HMO prenatal population, to evaluate the level of interest among eligible patients, the effectiveness of prescreening education, attitudes toward the screening process, psychological effects, and utilization of prenatal diagnosis and its outcomes. The heterozygote identification rate and frequency of specific CFTR mutations were also assessed. Identified carriers were offered genetic counseling and testing of male partners. Prenatal diagnosis was offered if both parents were identified as carriers. A total of 5,161 women underwent carrier testing; 947 others completed survey instruments only. The acceptance rate of screening was high (78%), and pretest education by videotape was generally effective. Adverse psychological effects were not reported. Participants generally found screening to be desirable and useful. Screening identified 142 female heterozygotes, 109 couples in which the male partner was not a carrier, and 7 high-risk couples. The incidence of R117H mutations was much higher than expected. The number of identified carriers was much lower in Hispanics than in Caucasians. We conclude that large-scale prenatal screening for CF heterozygotes in the absence of a family history of CF is an acceptable method for identifying couples at risk for affected fetuses. Sufficient pretest education can be accomplished efficiently, test insensitivity is well accepted, adverse psychological events are not observed, and general patient satisfaction is high.     

Preconceptional cystic fibrosis carrier screening: attitudes and intentions of the target population

The aim of this study was to assess the attitudes and intentions of individuals planning a pregnancy with regard to preconceptional cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening and to determine factors associated with a positive and negative/neutral intention to have the test. A survey, based on a questionnaire, was conducted among a stratified random sample of 303 recently married couples (606 individuals). Of the eligible individuals, 70% (n = 380) participated. Of the respondents, 73% had a positive attitude toward a routine offer of preconceptional CF carrier screening, and 56% had the intention to participate in a screening program. A positive intention to have the test was associated with high perceived anticipation of regret, intended preconceptional behavior, high perceived pressure from experts, high perceived consequences of the test results, low perceived barriers, and low perceived negative consequences for family members. These results suggest that the offer of routine preconceptional CF carrier screening would lead to substantial acceptance among couples planning a pregnancy. Several variables related with intention were identified.     

Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis using immunoreactive trypsinogen and direct gene analysis: four years' experience.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the performance and impact of a two tier neonatal screening programme for cystic fibrosis based on an initial estimation of immunoreactive trypsinogen followed by direct gene analysis. DESIGN--Four year prospective study of two tier screening strategy. First tier: immunoreactive trypsinogen measured in dried blood spot samples from neonates aged 3-5 days. Second tier: direct gene analysis of cystic fibrosis mutations (delta F508, delta I506, G551D, G542X, and R553X) in samples with immunoreactive trypsinogen concentrations in highest 1% and in all neonates with meconium ileus or family history of cystic fibrosis. SETTING--South Australian Neonatal Screening Programme, Adelaide. SUBJECTS--All 88,752 neonates born in South Australia between December 1989 and December 1993. INTERVENTIONS--Neonates with two identifiable mutations were referred directly for clinical assessment and confirmatory sweat test; infants with only one identifiable mutation were recalled for sweat test at age 3-4 weeks. Parents of neonates identified as carriers of cystic fibrosis mutation were counselled and offered genetic testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Identification of all children with cystic fibrosis in the screened population. RESULTS--Of 1004 (1.13%) neonates with immunoreactive trypsinogen > or = 99th centile, 912 (90.8%) had no identifiable mutation. 23 neonates were homozygotes or compound heterozygotes; 69 carried one identifiable mutation, of whom six had positive sweat tests. Median age at clinical assessment for the 29 neonates with cystic fibrosis was 3 weeks; six had meconium ileus and two had affected siblings. 63 neonates were identified as carriers of a cystic fibrosis mutation. Extra laboratory costs for measuring immunoreactive trypsinogen and direct gene analysis were $A1.50 per neonate screened. CONCLUSION--This strategy results in early and accurate diagnosis of cystic fibrosis and performs better than screening strategies based on immunoreactive trypsinogen measurement alone.     

Targeted extended cystic fibrosis mutation testing on known and at-risk patients and relatives

This paper reports mathematically derived residual risks of being a carrier or being affected with cystic fibrosis following various screening scenarios to assist in interpreting test results and advising patients. While parental screening with 23 American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) cystic fibrosis mutations defines the 64% of affected U.S. Caucasian fetuses with two detectable mutations, newborn screening for elevated immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) and sweat chloride identifies an additional 36% of affected newborns with zero or one detected mutation. The relatives of these affected newborns with less than two detectable mutations have higher posterior (after) 23 mutation-negative test risks of carrying undetected mutations. These calculations emphasize how knowledge of the mutations in the related affected patient substantially improves upon the quality of after-test advice to patients. Furthermore, negative tests of the partner without a family history and/or more extensive cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene testing also increases the likelihood that a negative report is truly negative. When a newborn patient with zero or one detected CFTR mutation has an inconclusive sweat test result, the sweat test should be repeated before ordering additional often unnecessary CFTR gene sequencing. Given the same composite mutation panel test accuracy, a higher proportion of reported test results would be correct during parental screening than when testing at-risk fetuses or symptomatic newborns. Prenatal and newborn screening would be enhanced substantially by medical professionals offering copies of all positive parental and newborn test reports to the parents to share with their relatives. These principles are likely to be applicable to other genetic diseases as the most common mutation frequencies are reported.     

Offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening to an HMO population: factors associated with utilization.

We offered cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier testing to reproductive-age enrollees in an HMO, in order to determine factors associated with test utilization in a primarily nonpregnant population. Male and female enrollees either were mailed an invitation to have the test after attending an educational session (N = 2,713) or were approached in waiting rooms at the HMO sites and given the opportunity to have the test without making an additional visit (N = 608). Uptake was considerably higher when testing could be obtained without making an additional visit (23.5%) than when attendance at an educational session was required as a prerequisite for having the test (3.7%). Utilization was higher among respondents who were planning children. Caucasians, and those with higher educational attainment. Among respondents planning to have children, individuals with higher tolerance for test uncertainty, lower fear of stigma, and higher perceived risk of being a carrier were significantly more likely to have the test. Testing decisions were not associated with the perceived burden of a child with CF or with the likelihood of aborting for CF. Although utilization of CF carrier testing is relatively low among nonpregnant individuals, uptake is significantly higher when testing can be obtained with minimal effort. Factors associated with the decision to be tested had more to do with implications of being a carrier per se than with the concerns of having a child with CF.     

PCR-based screening for cystic fibrosis carrier mutations in an ethnically diverse pregnant population.

As the most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in North America, cystic fibrosis (CF) is an obvious candidate for general population carrier screening. Although the identification of the causative gene has made detection of asymptomatic carriers possible, the extreme heterogeneity of its mutations has limited the sensitivity of the available DNA screening tests and has called into question their utility when they are applied to patients with no family history of the disease. The purpose of this study was to determine the technical feasibility, patient acceptance and understanding, and psychosocial impact of large-scale CF carrier screening in an ethnically diverse pregnant population. A total of 4,739 pregnant women attending prenatal clinics located in both an academic medical center and a large HMO were invited in person to participate. Of this group, 3,543 received CF instruction and assessments of knowledge and mood, and 3,192 underwent DNA testing for the six most common CF mutations, by means of a noninvasive PCR-based reverse-dot-blot method. Overall participation rates (ranging from 53% at the HMO to 77% at the academic center) and consent rates for DNA testing after CF instruction (>98%) exceeded those of most other American studies. The PCR-based screening method worked efficiently on large numbers of samples, and 55 carriers and one at-risk couple were identified. Understanding of residual risk, anxiety levels, and overall satisfaction with the program were acceptable across all ethnic groups. Our strategy of approaching a motivated pregnant population in person with a rapid and noninvasive testing method may provide a practical model for developing a larger CF screening program targeting appropriate high-risk groups at the national level, and may also serve as a paradigm for population-based screening of other genetically heterogeneous disorders in the future.     

Antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: a trial of the couple model.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the delivery and acceptability of antenatal couple screening for cystic fibrosis. Carrier status was notified only when both members of a partnership had cystic fibrosis alleles and therefore a one in four risk of having an affected child. DESIGN--Mouthwash samples were tested when both partners participated. Results were returned only to positive couples. SETTING--Two large maternity hospitals in Edinburgh. SUBJECTS--Screening was offered to all couples who booked at one of the two hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--(a) The take up of screening, carriers and carrier couples identified, take up of prenatal diagnosis, and numbers of affected fetuses detected; (b) questionnaire measures of patient satisfaction and stress. RESULTS--Screening was offered to 8536 couples. 714 (8.4%) were regarded as ineligible, usually because of late booking or absence of a partner. 1900 (24.3%) of the remainder declined screening. Among the 5922 screened couples, four tested positive--that is, both partners were cystic fibrosis heterozygotes. All four elected to have prenatal diagnosis. There were three terminations of pregnancy because of an affected fetus, one couple having two successive pregnancies with affected fetuses. The participation rate was 76% for eligible couples (5922/7822) and 69% for all couples (5922/8536). Only 89 screened couples (1.5%) requested information on individual carrier status. No anxiety was detected among a cohort of the screened population, and 99% of questioned participants expressed satisfaction with the concept of couple screening. CONCLUSIONS--Antenatal couple screening is a satisfactory and acceptable way of screening for cystic fibrosis and has been adopted as routine in the two trial hospitals.     

Reproductive health knowledge and use of services among young adults in Dakar, Senegal

A study was conducted in Dakar, Senegal, to measure reproductive health knowledge and contraceptive use among young adults, and access to family planning services. A household survey was conducted with 1973 single and married women aged 15-24 and 936 single men aged 15-19. Two focus groups and a simulated client study were also conducted. The survey and focus groups noted gaps in knowledge of family planning methods and reproductive health. There were misconceptions about methods and only one-third of men and women aged 15-19 correctly identified the time of the menstrual cycle when a women is most likely to get pregnant. Contraceptive use at time of first premarital sexual experience was less than 30%. The simulated client study noted many barriers to services. 'Clients' felt uncomfortable in the clinics and felt that providers were reluctant to take care of them. None of the 'clients' who requested contraception received it.     

Immunisation against influenza among people aged over 65 living at home in Leicestershire during winter 1991-2.

OBJECTIVES--To assess the size of the elderly population for whom influenza vaccine is indicated and how many are vaccinated. DESIGN--Cohort questionnaire study. SETTING--Leicestershire general practices. SUBJECTS--800 elderly subjects selected a random from the Leicestershire family health services authority list who were not living in residential care, 565 of whom returned a questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Patient profile, vaccine offers, vaccination status, and reasons for not accepting vaccine. RESULTS--170 of 334 (51%) people aged 65-74 years and 106 of 205 (52%) aged > or = 75 years had one or more medical indications for influenza vaccine. 195 people were offered vaccine, 49 of whom had no risk factor. 152 offers were made opportunistically during visits to the practice and only six were made in writing or by telephone. Overall 113 of 266 patients with known medical indications were immunised. Vaccine was accepted by 148 of 189 (78%) offered it, and, as judged by acceptance in sequential years, influenza vaccine was well tolerated. The main reasons for not being vaccinated were misconception about risk status and inadequate advice from doctors. CONCLUSIONS--The prevalence of medical indications for vaccine is not large enough to justify a policy of universal immunisation. Most patients offered vaccine accept it and tolerate it well. Improved targeting and education is needed to increase immunisation of people at risk.