DU-145 and PC-3 human prostate cancer cell lines express androgen receptor: implications for the androgen receptor functions and regulation

The majority of human prostate cancer cell lines, including the two "classical" cell lines DU-145 and PC-3, are reported to be androgen receptor (AR)-negative. However, other studies have provided evidence that the DU-145 and PC-3 cell lines express AR mRNA. These contradictory observations prompted us to investigate whether DU-145 and PC-3 cell lines express the androgen receptor. Using antipeptide antibodies directed against three distinct regions of the human AR protein and an improved method to detect AR protein in immunoblotting, we report that DU-145 and PC-3 cell lines express AR protein. We found that the relative levels of the AR mRNA and protein that were detected in DU-145 and PC-3 cell lines were lower than the LNCaP, an AR-positive cell line. Moreover, the antibody directed against the non-variant region (amino acids 299-315), but not the variant N- or C-terminal region (amino acids 1-20 and 900-919, respectively) of the human AR protein, detected the expression of AR in all prostate cancer cell lines. Notably, treatment of these cell lines with dihydrotestosterone (DHT) resulted in measurable increases in the AR protein levels and considerable nuclear accumulation. Although, treatment of DU-145 and PC-3 cells with DHT did not result in stimulation of the activity of an AR-responsive reporter, knockdown of AR expression in PC-3 cells resulted in decreases in p21(CIP1) protein levels, and a measurable decrease in the activity of the p21-luc-reporter. Our observations demonstrate the expression of AR protein in DU-145 and PC-3 prostate cancer cell lines.     

Androgen enhances the antiproliferative activity of vitamin D3 by suppressing 24-hydroxylase expression in LNCaP cells

25-Hydroxyvitamin D3-24-hydroxylase (24-hydroxylase, CYP24) is an important inactivating enzyme controlling the concentrations of both active metabolites 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. In this paper, we demonstrate that 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 at 500 nM significantly increases the expression of 24-hydroxylase mRNA and the increase is significantly decreased by 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at concentrations of 1-100 nM in androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cells LNCaP. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 at 500 nM and 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 at 10 nM inhibit LNCaP cell growth, and the growth inhibition is enhanced by 1 nM DHT. Neither 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 nor 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 at physiological concentrations has growth effect. However, in the presence of 1 nM DHT, both 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 at physiological concentrations are clearly antiproliferative. These data demonstrate that DHT enhances the antiproliferative activity of Vitamin D3 hormones by inhibiting their inactivating enzyme. Most previous studies on Vitamin D3 action in cell cultures have used pharmacological concentrations of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, the present results demonstrate, for the first time, that both 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 at physiological concentrations are active in the presence of physiological concentration of androgen. The combined use of androgen and Vitamin D3 metabolites could be a promising treatment for prostate cancer.     

Negative regulation of the murine cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenase-3 (Aldh-3c) gene by functional CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 proteins.

We have examined enzyme activities and mRNA levels corresponding to aldehyde dehydrogenase-3 genes encoding cytosolic (ALDH3c) and microsomal (ALDH3m) forms. In contrast to negligible activities in the intact mouse liver, both ALDH3c and ALDH3m enzyme activities are inducible by benzo[a]pyrene and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in mouse hepatoma Hepa-1c1c7 cell cultures. Constitutive mRNA levels of ALDH3c are virtually absent, whereas those of ALDH3m are substantial; using Hepa-1 mutant lines, we show that both ALDH3c and ALDH3m are TCDD-inducible by an Ah receptor-dependent mechanism. Basal mRNA levels of ALDH3c, but not those of ALDH3m, are strikingly elevated in untreated mutant cells lacking a functional CYP1A1 enzyme; low ALDH3c basal mRNA levels can be restored by introduction of a functional murine CYP1A1 or human CYP1A2 enzyme into these mutant cells. These data suggest that the TCDD induction process is distinct from the CYP1A1/CYP1A2 metabolism-dependent repression of constitutive gene expression; we suggest that this latter property classifies the Aldh-3c gene, but not the Aldh-3m gene, as a member of the murine [Ah] battery.     

Effects of androgen receptor and androgen on gene expression in prostate stromal fibroblasts and paracrine signaling to prostate cancer cells

The androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in a subset of prostate stromal cells and functional stromal cell AR is required for normal prostate developmental and influences the growth of prostate tumors. Although we are broadly aware of the specifics of the genomic actions of AR in prostate cancer cells, relatively little is known regarding the gene targets of functional AR in prostate stromal cells. Here, we describe a novel human prostate stromal cell model that enabled us to study the effects of AR on gene expression in these cells. The model involves a genetically manipulated variant of immortalized human WPMY-1 prostate stromal cells that overexpresses wildtype AR (WPMY-AR) at a level comparable to LNCaP cells and is responsive to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) stimulation. Use of WPMY-AR cells for gene expression profiling showed that the presence of AR, even in the absence of DHT, significantly altered the gene expression pattern of the cells compared to control (WPMY-Vec) cells. Treatment of WPMY-AR cells, but not WPMY-Vec control cells, with DHT resulted in further changes that affected the expression of 141 genes by 2-fold or greater compared to vehicle treated WPMY-AR cells. Remarkably, DHT significantly downregulated more genes than were upregulated but many of these changes reversed the initial effects of AR overexpression alone on individual genes. The genes most highly effected by DHT treatment were categorized based upon their role in cancer pathways or in cell signaling pathways (transforming growth factor-β, Wnt, Hedgehog and MAP Kinase) thought to be involved in stromal-epithelial crosstalk during prostate or prostate cancer development. DHT treatment of WPMY-AR cells was also sufficient to alter their paracrine potential for prostate cancer cells as conditioned medium from DHT-treated WPMY-AR significantly increased growth of LNCaP cells compared to DHT-treated WPMY-Vec cell conditioned medium.     

MicroRNAs are mediators of androgen action in prostate and muscle

Androgen receptor (AR) function is critical for the development of male reproductive organs, muscle, bone and other tissues. Functionally impaired AR results in androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). The interaction between AR and microRNA (miR) signaling pathways was examined to understand the role of miRs in AR function. Reduction of androgen levels in Sprague-Dawley rats by castration inhibited the expression of a large set of miRs in prostate and muscle, which was reversed by treatment of castrated rats with 3 mg/day dihydrotestosterone (DHT) or selective androgen receptor modulators. Knockout of the miR processing enzyme, DICER, in LNCaP prostate cancer cells or tissue specifically in mice inhibited AR function leading to AIS. Since the only function of miRs is to bind to 3' UTR and inhibit translation of target genes, androgens might induce miRs to inhibit repressors of AR function. In concordance, knock-down of DICER in LNCaP cells and in tissues in mice induced the expression of corepressors, NCoR and SMRT. These studies demonstrate a feedback loop between miRs, corepressors and AR and the imperative role of miRs in AR function in non-cancerous androgen-responsive tissues.     

PI3 Kinase inhibition on TRAIL-induced apoptosis correlates with androgen-sensitivity and p21 expression in prostate cancer cells

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) can induce apoptosis in many types of cancer cells. TRAIL is considered a therapeutic target, therefore, it was of interest to examine molecular mechanisms that may modulate sensitivity to TRAIL signaling in prostate cancer cells. LNCaP cells were found to be relatively resistant to TRAIL induced cell death while PC3 cells were sensitive. PI3-kinase (PI3 K) inhibitors were able to render LNCaP cells sensitive to TRAIL but conferred resistance to PC3 cells. PI3 K inhibitors were associated with an increase in p21^{waf1, cip1} expression in PC3 cells where as p21 decreases in LNCaP cells suggesting that p21 may impart TRAIL resistance. Since androgen receptor (AR) signaling can be modulated by AKT, and p21 is an AR responsive gene, the impact of PI3 K inhibition on TRAIL sensitivity was evaluated in AR transfected PC3 cells (PC3AR). The expression of AR was significantly downregulated by PI3 K inhibition in LNCaP cells, which have an intact AR signaling axis. PC3AR cells expressed higher levels of p21 protein and were relatively resistant to TRAIL compared to control cells. Finally, using adenoviral p21 gene transfer we directly demonstrated that p21 can confer resistance to TRAIL-induced cell death. These results suggest that TRAIL resistance is not regulated simply by a PI3 K/AKT survival pathway associated with inactivating PTEN mutations but may also be modulated by downstream AR responsive targets such as p21. These findings may have significant clinical implications for the utility of TRAIL in the management of prostate cancer.     

Wild‐type and specific mutant androgen receptor mediates transcription via 17β‐estradiol in sex hormone‐sensitive cancer cells

We previously encountered regulatory processes wherein dihydrotestosterone (DHT) exerted its inhibitory effect on parathyroid hormone‐related protein (PTHrP) gene repression through the estrogen receptor (ER)α, but not the androgen receptor (AR), in breast cancer MCF‐7 cells. Here, we investigated whether such aberrant ligand‐nuclear receptor (NR) interaction is present in prostate cancer LNCaP cells. First, we confirmed that LNCaP cells expressed large amounts of AR at negligible levels of ERα/β or progesterone receptor. Both suppression of PTHrP and activation of prostate‐specific antigen genes were observed after independent administration of 17β‐estradiol (E2), DHT, or R5020. Consistent with the notion that the LNCaP AR lost its ligand specificity due to a mutation (Thr‐Ala877), experiments with siRNA targeting the respective NR revealed that the AR monopolized the role of the mediator of shared hormone‐dependent regulation, which was invariably associated with nuclear translocation of this mutant AR. Microarray analysis of gene regulation by DHT, E2, or R5020 disclosed that more than half of the genes downstream of the AR (Thr‐Ala877) overlapped in the LNCaP cells. Of particular interest, we realized that the AR (wild‐type [wt]) and AR (Thr‐Ala877) were equally responsible for the E2‐AR interactions. Fluorescence microscopy experiments demonstrated that both EGFP‐AR (wt) and EGFP‐AR (Thr‐Ala877) were exclusively localized within the nucleus after E2 or DHT treatment. Furthermore, reporter assays revealed that some other cancer cells exhibited aberrant E2‐AR (wt) signaling similar to that in the LNCaP cells. We herein postulate the presence of entangled interactions between wt AR and E2 in certain hormone‐sensitive cancer cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 230: 1594–1606, 2015. © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Cellular Physiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.