tRNA genes are found between 16S and 23S rRNA genes in Bacillus subtilis.

There are at least nine, and probably ten, ribosomal RNA gene sets in the genome of Bacillus subtilis. Each gene set contains sequences complementary to 16S, 23S and 5S rRNAs. We have determined the nucleotide sequences of two DNA fragments which each contain 165 base pairs of the 16S rRNA gene, 191 base pairs of the 23S rRNA gene, and the spacer region between them. The smaller space region is 164 base pairs in length and the larger one includes an additional 180 base pairs. The extra nucleotides could be transcribed in tRNAIIe and tRNA Ala sequences. Evidence is also presented for the existence of a second spacer region which also contains tRNAIIe and tRNA Ala sequences. No other tRNAs appear to be encoded in the spacer regions between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes. Whereas the nucleotide sequences corresponding to the 16S rRNA, 23S rRNA and the spacer tRNAs are very similar to those of E. coli, the sequences between these structural genes are very different.     

Prediction of secondary structures of 16S and 23S rRNA fromEscherichia coli

Small and large subunits ofEscherichia coli ribosome have three different rRNAs, the sequences of which are known. However, attempts by three groups to predict secondary structures of 16S and 23S rRNAs have certain common limitations namely, these structures are predicted assuming no interactions among various domains of the molecule and only 40% residues are involved in base pairing as against the experimental observation of 60 % residues in base paired state. Recent experimental studies have shown that there is a specific interaction between naked 16S and 23S rRNA molecules. This is significant because we have observed that the regions (oligonucleotides of length 9–10 residues), in 16S rRNA which are complementary to those in 23S rRNA do not have internal complementary sequences. Therefore, we have developed a simple graph theoretical approach to predict secondary structures of 16S and 23S rRNAs. Our method for model building not only uses complete sequence of 16S or 23S rRNA molecule along with other experimental observations but also takes into account the observation that specific recognition is possible through the complementary sequences between 16S and 23S rRNA molecules and, therefore, these parts of the molecules are not used for internal base pairing. The method used to predict secondary structures is discussed. A typical secondary structure of the complex between 16S and 23S rRNA molecules, obtained using our method, is presented and compared Briefly with earlier model Building studies.     

Lessons from an evolving rRNA: 16S and 23S rRNA structures from a comparative perspective.

The 16S and 23S rRNA higher-order structures inferred from comparative analysis are now quite refined. The models presented here differ from their immediate predecessors only in minor detail. Thus, it is safe to assert that all of the standard secondary-structure elements in (prokaryotic) rRNAs have been identified, with approximately 90% of the individual base pairs in each molecule having independent comparative support, and that at least some of the tertiary interactions have been revealed. It is interesting to compare the rRNAs in this respect with tRNA, whose higher-order structure is known in detail from its crystal structure (36) (Table 2). It can be seen that rRNAs have as great a fraction of their sequence in established secondary-structure elements as does tRNA. However, the fact that the former show a much lower fraction of identified tertiary interactions and a greater fraction of unpaired nucleotides than the latter implies that many of the rRNA tertiary interactions remain to be located. (Alternatively, the ribosome might involve protein-rRNA rather than intramolecular rRNA interactions to stabilize three-dimensional structure.) Experimental studies on rRNA are consistent to a first approximation with the structures proposed here, confirming the basic assumption of comparative analysis, i.e., that bases whose compositions strictly covary are physically interacting. In the exhaustive study of Moazed et al. (45) on protection of the bases in the small-subunit rRNA against chemical modification, the vast majority of bases inferred to pair by covariation are found to be protected from chemical modification, both in isolated small-subunit rRNA and in the 30S subunit. The majority of the tertiary interactions are reflected in the chemical protection data as well (45). On the other hand, many of the bases not shown as paired in Fig. 1 are accessible to chemical attack (45). However, in this case a sizeable fraction of them are also protected against chemical modification (in the isolated rRNA), which suggests that considerable higher-order structure remains to be found (although all of it may not involve base-base interactions and so may not be detectable by comparative analysis). The agreement between the higher-order structure of the small-subunit rRNA and protection against chemical modification is not perfect, however; some bases shown to covary canonically are accessible to chemical modification (45).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Sequence of the 16S rRNA gene from the thermoacidophilic archaebacteriumSulfolobus solfataricus and its evolutionary implications

Summary The sequence of the small-subunit rRNA from the thermoacidophilic archaebacteriumSulfolobus solfataricus has been determined and compared with its counterparts from halophilic and methanogenic archaebacteria, eukaryotes, and eubacteria. TheS. solfataricus sequence is specifically related to those of the other archaebacteria, to the exclusion of the eukaryotic and eubacterial sequences, when examined either by evolutionary distance matrix analyses or by the criterion of minimum change (maximum parsimony). The archaebacterial 16S rRNA sequences all conform to a common secondary structure, with theS. solfataricus structure containing a higher proportion of canonical base pairs and fewer helical irregularities than the rRNAs from the mesophilic archaebacteria.S. solfataricus is unusual in that its 16S rRNA-23S rRNA intergenic spacer lacks a tRNA gene.     

The 23S ribosomal RNA higher-order structure of Pseudomonas cepacia and other prokaryotes

A 23S ribosomal RNA gene of Pseudomonas cepacia has been cloned and sequenced. A general higher-order structure model based on earlier published models has been derived from comparative analysis of 23S-like rRNAs of eubacteria, archaebacteria, organelles and eukaryotes. Differences between the previous models were carefully analyzed and controversial regions evaluated. Moderately large insertions and deletions have been found at new points in the secondary structure. The analysis of 50 published as well as unpublished 23S rRNA sequences provide additional proof for six of the seven previously suggested tertiary interactions within the 23S rRNA. P. cepacia is the first representative of the beta subgroup of the Proteobacteria phylum whose 23S rRNA has been sequenced. A tree reflecting evolutionary relationships of prokaryotes was constructed. The topology of this tree is in good agreement with the 16S rRNA tree.     

The rRNA operon from Zea mays chloroplasts: nucleotide sequence of 23S rDNA and its homology with E.coli 23S rDNA.

The nucleotide sequence of 23S rDNA from Zea mays chloroplasts has been determined. Alignment with 23S rDNA from E.coli reveals 71 percent homology when maize 4.5S rDNA is included as an equivalent of the 3' end of E.coli 23S rDNA. Among the conserved sequences are sites for base modification. Chloramphenicol sensitivity and ribosomal subunit interaction. A proposal for the base pairs formed between 16S and 23S rRNAs during the 30S/50S subunit interaction is presented. The alignment of maize 23S rDNA with that of E.coli reveals three small insertion sequences of 25, 65 and 78 base pairs, whereas maize 16S rDNA shows only deletions when compared with the E.coli species.     

A comparison of the crystal structures of eukaryotic and bacterial SSU ribosomal RNAs reveals common structural features in the hypervariable regions

While the majority of the ribosomal RNA structure is conserved in the three major domains of life--archaea, bacteria, and eukaryotes, specific regions of the rRNA structure are unique to at least one of these three primary forms of life. In particular, the comparative secondary structure for the eukaryotic SSU rRNA contains several regions that are different from the analogous regions in the bacteria. Our detailed analysis of two recently determined eukaryotic 40S ribosomal crystal structures, Tetrahymena thermophila and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the comparison of these results with the bacterial Thermus thermophilus 30S ribosomal crystal structure: (1) revealed that the vast majority of the comparative structure model for the eukaryotic SSU rRNA is substantiated, including the secondary structure that is similar to both bacteria and archaea as well as specific for the eukaryotes, (2) resolved the secondary structure for regions of the eukaryotic SSU rRNA that were not determined with comparative methods, (3) identified eukaryotic helices that are equivalent to the bacterial helices in several of the hypervariable regions, (4) revealed that, while the coaxially stacked compound helix in the 540 region in the central domain maintains the constant length of 10 base pairs, its two constituent helices contain 5+5 bp rather than the 6+4 bp predicted with comparative analysis of archaeal and eukaryotic SSU rRNAs.     

The 3''-terminal region of bacterial 23S ribosomal RNA: structure and homology with the 3''-terminal region of eukaryotic 28S rRNA and with chloroplast 4.5s rRNA.

The sequence of the 110 nucleotide fragment located at the 3'-end of E.coli, P.vulgaris and A.punctata 23S rRNAs has been determined. The homology between the E.coli and P.vulgaris fragments is 90%, whereas that between the E.coli and A.punctate fragments is only 60%. The three rRNA fragments have sequences compatible with a secondary structure consisting of two hairpins. Using chemical and enzymatic methods recently developed for the study of the secondary structure of RNA, we demonstrated that one of these hairpins and part of the other are actually present in the three 3'-terminal fragments in solution. This supports the existence of these two hairpins in the intact molecule. Indeed, results obtained upon limited digestion of intact 23S RNA with T1 RNase were in good agreement with the existence of these two hairpins. We observed that the primary structures of the 3'-terminal regions of yeast 26S rRNA and X.laevis 28S rRNA are both compatible with a secondary structure similar to that found at the 3'-end of bacterial 23S rRNAs. Furthermore, both tobacco and wheat chloroplast 4.5S rRNAs can also be folded in a similar way as the 3'-terminal region of bacterial 23S rRNA, the 3'-end of chloroplast 4.5S rRNAs being complementary to the 5'-end of chloroplast 23S rRNA. This strongly reinforces the hypothesis that chloroplast 4.5S rRNA originates from the 3'-end of bacterial 23S rRNA and suggests that this rRNA may be base-paired with the 5'-end of chloroplast 23S rRNA. Invariant oligonucleotides are present at identical positions in the homologous secondary structures of E.coli 23S, yeast 26S, X.laevis 28S and wheat and tobacco 4.5S rRNAs. Surprisingly, the sequences of these oligonucleotides are not all conserved in the 3'-terminal regions of A.punctata or even P.vulgaris 23S rRNAs. Results obtained upon mild methylation of E.coli 50S subunits with dimethylsulfate strongly suggest that these invariant oligonucleotides are involved in RNA tertiary structure or in RNA-protein interactions.     

Modular RNA architecture revealed by computational analysis of existing pseudoknots and ribosomal RNAs

Modular architecture is a hallmark of RNA structures, implying structural, and possibly functional, similarity among existing RNAs. To systematically delineate the existence of smaller topologies within larger structures, we develop and apply an efficient RNA secondary structure comparison algorithm using a newly developed two-dimensional RNA graphical representation. Our survey of similarity among 14 pseudoknots and subtopologies within ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) uncovers eight pairs of structurally related pseudoknots with non-random sequence matches and reveals modular units in rRNAs. Significantly, three structurally related pseudoknot pairs have functional similarities not previously known: one pair involves the 3′ end of brome mosaic virus genomic RNA (PKB134) and the alternative hammerhead ribozyme pseudoknot (PKB173), both of which are replicase templates for viral RNA replication; the second pair involves structural elements for translation initiation and ribosome recruitment found in the viral internal ribosome entry site (PKB223) and the V4 domain of 18S rRNA (PKB205); the third pair involves 18S rRNA (PKB205) and viral tRNA-like pseudoknot (PKB134), which probably recruits ribosomes via structural mimicry and base complementarity. Additionally, we quantify the modularity of 16S and 23S rRNAs by showing that RNA motifs can be constructed from at least 210 building blocks. Interestingly, we find that the 5S rRNA and two tree modules within 16S and 23S rRNAs have similar topologies and tertiary shapes. These modules can be applied to design novel RNA motifs via build-up-like procedures for constructing sequences and folds.     

Primary structure of the 5.8S gene of rRNA and internal transcribed spacers of rDNA in diploid wheat Triticum urartu thum. ex. gandil

Nucleotide sequences of 5.8S rRNA gene and rDNA internal transcribed spacers ITS-1 and ITS-2 were determined in diploid wheat Triticum urartu. It was shown that 5.8S rRNA gene of this wheat species consists of 163 base pairs and GC-content is 59.5%. When comparing 5.8S rRNA sequences in diploid wheat, rice and lupine and also 5.8S rRNA in hexaploid wheat and horse beans a high evolutional conservatism of its structure was revealed. The size of ITS-1 and ITS-2 in Tr. urartu is 219 and 225 base pairs long correspondingly. While comparing structures of similar rDNA regions of Tr. urartu, rice and maize a high level of homology was found only between nucleotides adjoining genes of high molecular rRNAs. In ITS-1 of Tr. urartu an insertion of 5'-GACGACGACATTGTCCGTC-3' was found, which is absent in maize and rice.     

Paramecium mitochondrial genes. II. Large subunit rRNA gene sequence and microevolution

Mature Paramecium mitochondrial large subunit rRNA consists of two stable segments: a 20 S segment described previously and a unique 283-base segment similar to 5.8 S rRNAs typically found in eucaryotic cytoplasmic RNA. pBR325 clones of both gene regions from both Paramecium primaurelia and Paramecium tetraurelia were sequenced and aligned. The gene segments lie adjacent to each other very near the replicative terminal end of the linear Paramecium mitochondrial genome and are transcribed from a common 23 S precursor. The precise gene ends were determined using nuclease S1 protection; the large subunit rRNA gene complex (consisting of "5.8 S-like" rRNA, a 19-26-base excised region, and 20 S rRNA) spans about 2654 base pairs. The gene complex is preceded by a 15-base poly(T) tract and terminates randomly within a 20-base A + T-rich segment immediately preceding the tRNATyr gene. The sequences from the two species were 4% divergent, the changes consisting of 59% transitions, 38% transversions, and 3% insertions or deletions. The sequences were aligned with Escherichia coli 23 S rRNA, and a secondary structure model is presented for the entire molecule based on structures proposed for E. coli 23 S rRNA.     

Computer analysis of potential stem structures of rRNA operons in various procaryote genomes

The processing of 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA by RNase III in E.coli is known to involve stem structures formed by both ends of the rRNA. Indeed, complementary nucleotide sequences are usually found at both ends of 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA. However, whether or not this phenomenon exists in various other bacteria has not yet been adequately studied. We have conducted computer analyses of potential stem structures of rRNA operons in 12 bacterial and 3 archaeal genomes, and compared characteristics of the stem structures among these species. We systematically computed free energy values by exhaustively 'annealing' sequences around the 5' end and sequences around the 3' end of both 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA genes, in order to predict potential stem structures.The results suggest that rRNAs in most species form stem structures at both ends. Some species, such as A.aeolicus, seem to form unusually stable stem structures. On the other hand, some rRNAs, such as rRNAs of D.radiodurans, seem not to form solid stem structures. This suggests that rRNA processing in those species must employ a reliable targeting mechanism other than recognizing stem structures by RNase III.     

Electron microscopic mapping of secondary structures in bacterial 16S and 23S ribosomal ribonucleic acid and 30S precursor ribosomal ribonucleic acid

Electron microscopy revealed reproducible secondary structure patterns within partially denatured 16S and 23S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) from Escherichia coli. When prepared with 50% formamide-100 mM ammonium acetate, 16S rRNA included two small hairpins that appeared in over 50% of all molecules. Three open loops were observed with frequencies of less than 25%. In contrast, 23S rRNA included a terminal open loop and two additional large structures in over 75% of all molecules. These secondary structure patterns were conserved in the 16S and 23S rRNA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The secondary structure of the 30S precursor rRNA from the ribonclease III-deficient E. coli mutant AB105 was mapped after partial denaturation in 70% formamide-100 mM ammonium acetate. Two large open loops were superimposed on the 16S and 23S rRNA secondary structure patterns. These loops were the most frequent structures found on the precursor, and their stems coincided with ribonuclease III cleavage sites. A tentative 5'-3 orientation was determined for the secondary structure patterns of 16S and 23S rRNA from their relative locations within 30S precursor rRNA. The relation of secondary structure to ribosomal protein binding and ribonuclease III cleavage is discussed.     

Secondary structure model for bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA: phylogenetic, enzymatic and chemical evidence.

We have derived a secondary structure model for 16S ribosomal RNA on the basis of comparative sequence analysis, chemical modification studies and nuclease susceptibility data. Nucleotide sequences of the E. coli and B. brevis 16S rRNA chains, and of RNAse T1 oligomer catalogs from 16S rRNAs of over 100 species of eubacteria were used for phylogenetic comparison. Chemical modification of G by glyoxal, A by m-chloroperbenzoic acid and C by bisulfite in naked 16S rRNA, and G by kethoxal in active and inactive 30S ribosomal subunits was taken as an indication of single stranded structure. Further support for the structure was obtained from susceptibility to RNases A and T1. These three approaches are in excellent agreement. The structure contains fifty helical elements organized into four major domains, in which 46 percent of the nucleotides of 16S rRNA are involved in base pairing. Phylogenetic comparison shows that highly conserved sequences are found principally in unpaired regions of the molecule. No knots are created by the structure.     

Evolution of the secondary structures and compensatory mutations of the ribosomal RNAs of Drosophila melanogaster

This paper examines the effects of DNA sequence evolution on RNA secondary structures and compensatory mutations. Models of the secondary structures of Drosophila melanogaster 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and of the complex between 2S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNAs have been drawn on the basis of comparative and energetic criteria. The overall AU richness of the D. melanogaster rRNAs allows the resolution of some ambiguities in the structures of both large rRNAs. Comparison of the sequence of expansion segment V2 in D. melanogaster 18S rRNA with the same region in three other Drosophila species and the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans morsitans) allows us to distinguish between two models for the secondary structure of this region. The secondary structures of the expansion segments of D. melanogaster 28S rRNA conform to a general pattern for all eukaryotes, despite having highly divergent sequences between D. melanogaster and vertebrates. The 70 novel compensatory mutations identified in the 28S rRNA show a strong (70%) bias toward A-U base pairs, suggesting that a process of biased mutation and/or biased fixation of A and T point mutations or AT-rich slippage-generated motifs has occurred during the evolution of D. melanogaster rDNA. This process has not occurred throughout the D. melanogaster genome. The processes by which compensatory pairs of mutations are generated and spread are discussed, and a model is suggested by which a second mutation is more likely to occur in a unit with a first mutation as such a unit begins to spread through the family and concomitantly through the population. Alternatively, mechanisms of proofreading in stem-loop structures at the DNA level, or between RNA and DNA, might be involved. The apparent tolerance of noncompensatory mutations in some stems which are otherwise strongly supported by comparative criteria within D. melanogaster 28S rRNA must be borne in mind when compensatory mutations are used as a criterion in secondary-structure modeling. Noncompensatory mutation may extend to the production of unstable structures where a stem is stabilized by RNA- protein or additional RNA-RNA interactions in the mature ribosome. Of motifs suggested to be involved in rRNA processing, one (CGAAAG) is strongly overrepresented in the 28S rRNA sequence. The data are discussed both in the context of the forces involved with the evolution of multigene families and in the context of molecular coevolution in the rDNA family in particular.