Rough deal and Zw10 are required for the metaphase checkpoint in Drosophila

The metaphase-anaphase transition during mitosis is carefully regulated in order to assure high-fidelity transmission of genetic information to the daughter cells. A surveillance mechanism known as the metaphase checkpoint (or spindle-assembly checkpoint) monitors the attachment of kinetochores to the spindle microtubules, and inhibits anaphase onset until all chromosomes have achieved a proper bipolar orientation on the spindle. Defects in this checkpoint lead to premature anaphase onset, and consequently to greatly increased rates of aneuploidy. Here we show that the Drosophila kinetochore components Rough deal (Rod) and Zeste-White 10 (Zw10) are required for the proper functioning of the metaphase checkpoint in flies. Drosophila cells lacking either ROD or Zw10 exhibit a phenotype that is similar to that of bub1 mutants - they do not arrest in metaphase in response to spindle damage, but instead separate sister chromatids, degrade cyclin B and exit mitosis. These are the first checkpoint components to be identified that do not have obvious homologues in budding yeast.     

Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle

To test the popular but unproven assumption that the metaphase-anaphase transition in vertebrate somatic cells is subject to a checkpoint that monitors chromosome (i.e., kinetochore) attachment to the spindle, we filmed mitosis in 126 PtK1 cells. We found that the time from nuclear envelope breakdown to anaphase onset is linearly related (r2 = 0.85) to the duration the cell has unattached kinetochores, and that even a single unattached kinetochore delays anaphase onset. We also found that anaphase is initiated at a relatively constant 23-min average interval after the last kinetochore attaches, regardless of how long the cell possessed unattached kinetochores. From these results we conclude that vertebrate somatic cells possess a metaphase-anaphase checkpoint control that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. We also found that some cells treated with 0.3-0.75 nM Taxol, after the last kinetochore attached to the spindle, entered anaphase and completed normal poleward chromosome motion (anaphase A) up to 3 h after the treatment--well beyond the 9-48-min range exhibited by untreated cells. The fact that spindle bipolarity and the metaphase alignment of kinetochores are maintained in these cells, and that the chromosomes move poleward during anaphase, suggests that the checkpoint monitors more than just the attachment of microtubules at sister kinetochores or the metaphase alignment of chromosomes. Our data are most consistent with the hypothesis that the checkpoint monitors an increase in tension between kinetochores and their associated microtubules as biorientation occurs.     

Centromeres: old tales and new tools

The centromere is a specialised region of the eukaryotic chromosome that directs the equal segregation of sister chromatids into two daughter cells during mitosis. In mitosis, the kinetochores mediate (1) microtubule capture and chromosome alignment at a metaphase plate; (2) the correction of improper microtubule attachments; (3) the maintenance of an active checkpoint until bi-orientation is achieved by the whole complement of chromosomes; (4) the establishment of tension within the centromere which, in turn, contributes to silencing of the spindle checkpoint and triggers the onset of anaphase. In this review, we will analyse how centromeres are organised with respect to chromatin types and arrangements.     

Studies of multipolar mitoses in euploid tissue cultures

Cultures of kidney epithelium and fibroblasts of 39 specimens of Microtus agrestis were investigated. In all 77 cultures multipolar mitoses were found. They were studied in living state and after pulse labelling with ³H-thymidine. The ploidy of the multipolar mitoses and of their daughter nuclei was determined by measuring the relative Feulgen-DNA content and by counting the predominantly constitutive heterochromatic sex chromosomes. Constitutive heterochromatin was demonstrated by late replication, retarded separation of the chromatids in anaphase, heteropycnosis and by the Giemsa technique of Arrighi and Hsu (1971). The latter stained also the spindle apparatus of mitoses.—In living cells, transformation of multipolar mitoses into bipolar mitoses was observed. The chromosomes of multipolar mitoses are separated into complete genomes; the daughter nuclei can be haploid, diploid, triploid or tetraploid. The chromosomes of haploid and triploid metaphases were studied with the Giemsa banding technique. The banding pattern shows an exact monosomy and trisomy, respectively, for each chromosome. Haploid nuclei are likely to be viable only in multinucleate cells, whereas triploid cells behave like diploid cells during the S period and the mitosis.Dedicated to Prof. Dr. K. Goerttler on the occasion of his 75th birthday.Supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Wissenschaft of the Federal Republic of Germany.     

Shugoshin1 may play important roles in separation of homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids during mouse oocyte meiosis

Background

Homologous chromosomes separate in meiosis I and sister chromatids separate in meiosis II, generating haploid gametes. To address the question why sister chromatids do not separate in meiosis I, we explored the roles of Shogoshin1 (Sgo1) in chromosome separation during oocyte meiosis.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Sgo1 function was evaluated by exogenous overexpression to enhance its roles and RNAi to suppress its roles during two meioses of mouse oocytes. Immunocytochemistry and chromosome spread were used to evaluate phenotypes. The exogenous Sgo1 overexpression kept homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids not to separate in meiosis I and meiosis II, respectively, while the Sgo1 RNAi promoted premature separation of sister chromatids.

Conclusions

Our results reveal that prevention of premature separation of sister chromatids in meiosis I requires the retention of centromeric Sgo1, while normal separation of sister chromatids in meiosis II requires loss of centromeric Sgo1.     

Mitotic checkpoints and the maintenance of the chromosome karyotype

The goal of the mitotic cell division is the faithful transmission of chromosomes to the daughter cells. To fulfil a correct separation of sister chromatids, kinetochores of all chromosomes should be correctly attached to spindle microtubules of opposite poles and should all be under tension. These events are monitored by the spindle checkpoint, which delays mitotic progression allowing time for corrections when errors occur in the dynamic interactions between chromosomes and microtubules. The G(1) post-mitotic checkpoint constitutes an additional checkpoint preventing further proliferation of cells that have undergone massive spindle damage. This review concentrates on the key structural and protein components which are pivotal for an accurate segregation of chromosomes during anaphase: the chromosome scaffold, sister chromatid cohesion and segregation and the kinetochores in higher eukaryotes. Furthermore, recent advances in understanding spindle and G(1) post-mitotic checkpoint and how they prevent aneuploidization and polyploidization are presented. In a last part the impact of aneuploidy and polyploidy on human health and in particular on cancer development is highlighted.     

The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint

The proper segregation of sister chromatids in mitosis depends on bipolar attachment of all chromosomes to the mitotic spindle. We have identified the small molecule Hesperadin as an inhibitor of chromosome alignment and segregation. Our data imply that Hesperadin causes this phenotype by inhibiting the function of the mitotic kinase Aurora B. Mammalian cells treated with Hesperadin enter anaphase in the presence of numerous monooriented chromosomes, many of which may have both sister kinetochores attached to one spindle pole (syntelic attachment). Hesperadin also causes cells arrested by taxol or monastrol to enter anaphase within <1 h, whereas cells in nocodazole stay arrested for 3-5 h. Together, our data suggest that Aurora B is required to generate unattached kinetochores on monooriented chromosomes, which in turn could promote bipolar attachment as well as maintain checkpoint signaling.     

Kiss and break up—a safe passage to anaphase in mitosis and meiosis

Eukaryotic chromosomes have many challenges to overcome between DNA replication and sister chromatid segregation. If these challenges are not met, cell death or unregulated cell division (cancer) may result. During prophase, chromosomes condense, the nuclear membrane breaks down and cohesins are removed from chromosome arms. In prometaphase, initial spindle attachments are made by sister kinetochores followed by correction of erroneous attachments, centromere oscillation between spindle poles and congression towards the cell's equator. In metaphase, all chromosomes attain stable bipolar spindle attachments and align at the metaphase plate, ready for the metaphase–anaphase transition when all ties between sister chromatids are broken. This review concentrates on recent developments that have revealed the intricacies of these processes. We now know more about how the mechanisms of cohesin removal differ between prophase and the metaphase–anaphase transition, the processes for detection and correction of improper spindle-kinetochore attachments and the concept that tension between sister kinetochores is the driving factor for satisfying the spindle checkpoint. We are also beginning to gain some understanding of the mechanisms behind the co-segregation of sister chromatids at the first meiotic division. Review related to the 15th International Chromosome Conference (ICC XV), held in September 2004, Brunel University, London, UK     

Regulation of Centromeric Cohesion by Sororin Independently of the APC/C

Regulated separation of sister chromatids is the key event of mitosis. Sister chromatids remain cohered from the moment of DNA duplication until anaphase. Two known factors account for cohesion: DNA catenations and cohesin complexes. Premature loss of centromeric cohesion is prevented by the spindle checkpoint. Here we show that sororin, a protein implicated in promoting cohesion through effects on cohesin complexes, is involved in maintenance of cohesion in response to the spindle checkpoint. Sororin-depleted cells reach prometaphase with cohered sister chromatids and are able to form metaphase plates. However, loss of cohesion in anaphase is asynchronous and cells are unresponsive to the spindle checkpoint, accumulating with separated sisters scattered throughout the cytoplasm. These phenotypes are similar to those seen after Shugoshin depletion, suggesting that sororin and Shugoshin might act in concert. Furthermore, sororin-depleted and Shugoshin-depleted cells lose cohesion independently of the APC/C. Therefore, sororin and Shugoshin protect centromeric cohesion in response to the spindle checkpoint, but prevent the removal of cohesion by a mechanism independent of the APC/C.     

DNA catenations that link sister chromatids until the onset of anaphase are maintained by a checkpoint mechanism

Treatment of Allium cepa meristematic cells in metaphase with the topoisomerase II inhibitor ICRF-193, results in bridging of the sister chromatids at anaphase. Separation of the sisters in experimentally generated acentric chromosomal fragments was also inhibited by ICRF-193, indicating that some non-centromeric catenations also persist in metaphase chromosomes. Thus, catenations must be resolved by DNA topoisomerase II at the metaphase-to-anaphase transition to allow segregation of sisters. A passive mechanism could maintain catenations holding sisters until the onset of anaphase. At this point the opposite tension exerted on sister chromatids could render the decatenation reaction physically more favorable than catenation. But this possibility was dismissed as acentric chromosome fragments were able to separate their sister chromatids at anaphase. A timing mechanism (a common trigger for two processes taking different times to be completed) could passively couple the resolution of the last remaining catenations to the moment of anaphase onset. This possibility was also discarded as cells arrested in metaphase with microtubule-destabilising drugs still displayed anaphase bridges when released in the presence of ICRF-193. It is possible that a checkpoint mechanism prevents the release of the last catenations linking sisters until the onset of anaphase. To test whether cells are competent to fully resolve catenations before anaphase onset, we generated multinucleate plant cells. In this system, the nuclei within a single multinucleate cell displayed differences in chromosome condensation at metaphase, but initiated anaphase synchronously. When multinucleates were treated with ICRF-193 at the metaphase-toanaphase transition, tangled and untangled anaphases were observed within the same cell. This can only occur if cells are competent to disentangle sister chromatids before the onset of anaphase, but are prevented from doing so by a checkpoint mechanism.     

Asynchronous entry into anaphase induced by okadaic acid: spindle microtubule organization and microtubule/kinetochore attachments

Summary We have found that a brief treatment of either PtK₂ cells or stamen hair cells ofTradescantia virginiana during metaphase with okadaic acid, a potent protein phosphatase inhibitor, results in asynchronous entry into anaphase. After this treatment, the interval for the separation of sister chromatids can be expanded from a few seconds to approximately 5 min. We have performed a series of immunolocalizations of cells with anti-tubulin antibodies and CREST serum, asking whether okadaic acid induces asynchronous entry into anaphase through changes in the organization of the spindle microtubules or through a loss in the attachment of spindle microtubules to the kinetochores. Our experiments clearly indicate that asynchronous entry into anaphase after phosphatase inhibitor treatment is not the result of either altered spindle microtubule organization or the long-term loss of microtubule attachment to kinetochores. The kinetochore fiber bundles for all of the separating chromosomes are normally of uniform length throughout anaphase, but after asynchronous entry into anaphase, different groups of kinetochore fiber bundles have distinctly different lengths. The reason for this difference in length is that once split apart, the daughter chromosomes begin their movement toward the spindle poles, with normal shortening of the kinetochore fiber bundle microtubules. Thus, okadaic acid treatment during metaphase does not affect anaphase chromosome movement once it has begun. Our results suggest that one or more protein phosphatases appear to play an important role during metaphase in the regulatory cascade that culminates in synchronous sister chromatid separation.     

Tethering Sister Centromeres to Each Other Suggests the Spindle Checkpoint Detects Stretch within the Kinetochore

The spindle checkpoint ensures that newly born cells receive one copy of each chromosome by preventing chromosomes from segregating until they are all correctly attached to the spindle. The checkpoint monitors tension to distinguish between correctly aligned chromosomes and those with both sisters attached to the same spindle pole. Tension arises when sister kinetochores attach to and are pulled toward opposite poles, stretching the chromatin around centromeres and elongating kinetochores. We distinguished between two hypotheses for where the checkpoint monitors tension: between the kinetochores, by detecting alterations in the distance between them, or by responding to changes in the structure of the kinetochore itself. To distinguish these models, we inhibited chromatin stretch by tethering sister chromatids together by binding a tetrameric form of the Lac repressor to arrays of the Lac operator located on either side of a centromere. Inhibiting chromatin stretch did not activate the spindle checkpoint; these cells entered anaphase at the same time as control cells that express a dimeric version of the Lac repressor, which cannot cross link chromatids, and cells whose checkpoint has been inactivated. There is no dominant checkpoint inhibition when sister kinetochores are held together: cells expressing the tetrameric Lac repressor still arrest in response to microtubule-depolymerizing drugs. Tethering chromatids together does not disrupt kinetochore function; chromosomes are successfully segregated to opposite poles of the spindle. Our results indicate that the spindle checkpoint does not monitor inter-kinetochore separation, thus supporting the hypothesis that tension is measured within the kinetochore.     

Inefficient degradation of cyclin B1 re-activates the spindle checkpoint right after sister chromatid disjunction

Sister chromatid separation creates a sudden loss of tension on kinetochores, which could, in principle, re-activate the spindle checkpoint in anaphase. This so-called “anaphase problem” is probably avoided by timely inactivation of cyclin B1-Cdk1, which may prevent the spindle tension sensing Aurora B kinase from destabilizing kinetochore–microtubule interactions as they lose tension in anaphase. However, exactly how spindle checkpoint re-activation is prevented remains unclear.

Here, we investigated how different degrees of cyclin B1 stabilization affected the spindle checkpoint in metaphase and anaphase. Cells expressing a strongly stabilized (R42A) mutant of cyclin B1 degraded APC/C^Cdc20 substrates normally, showing that checkpoint release was not inhibited by high cyclin B1-Cdk1 activity. However, after this initial wave of APC/C^Cdc20 activity, the spindle checkpoint returned in cells with uncohesed sister chromatids. Expression of a lysine mutant of cyclin B1 that is degraded only slightly inefficiently allowed a normal metaphase-to-anaphase transition. Strikingly, however, the spindle checkpoint returned in cells that had not degraded the cyclin B1 mutant 10–15 min after anaphase onset. When cyclin B1 remained in late anaphase, cytokinesis stalled, and translocation of INCENP from separated sister chromatids to the spindle midzone was blocked. This late anaphase arrest required the activity of Aurora B and Mps1. In conclusion, our results reveal that complete removal of cyclin B1 is essential to prevent the return of the spindle checkpoint following sister chromatid disjunction. Speculatively, increasing activity of APC/C^Cdc20 in late anaphase helps to keep cyclin B1 levels low.     

Laser microirradiation of kinetochores in mitotic PtK2 cells

Irradiation of the kinetochore region of PtK₂ chromosomes by laser light of 532 nm was used to study the function of the kinetochore region in chromosome movement and to create artificial micronuclei in cells. When the sister kinetochores of a chromosome were irradiated at prometaphase, the affected chromosome detached from the spindle and exhibited no further directed movements for the duration of mitosis. The chromatids of the chromosome remained attached to one another until anaphase, at which point they separated. No poleward movement of the chromatids was observed, and at telophase they passively moved to one of the daughter cells and were enclosed in a micronucleus. The daughter cell containing the micronucleus was then isolated by micromanipulation and followed through subsequent mitoses. At the next mitosis, two chromosomes, each with two chromatids, condensed in the micronucleus. These chromosomes did not attach to the spindle and showed chromatid separation, but no poleward movements at anaphase. They were again enclosed in micronuclei at telophase. The third generation mitosis was similar to the second. Occasionally, both the irradiation-produced and naturally occurring micronuclei exhibited no chromosome condensation at mitosis. Feulgenstained monolayers of PtK₂ cells with naturally occurring micronuclei showed that some micronuclei stain positive for DNA and others do not. This finding raises questions about the fate of chromosomes in a micronucleus.     

Laser microirradiation of kinetochores in mitotic PtK2 cells: chromatid separation and micronucleus formation

Irradiation of the kinetochore region of PtK2 chromosomes by laser light of 532 nm was used to study the function of the kinetochore region in chromosome movement and to create an artificial micronuclei in cells. When the sister kinetochores of a chromosome were irradiated at prometaphase, the affected chromosome detached from the spindle and exhibited no further directed movements for the duration of mitosis. The chromatids of the chromosome remained attached to one another until anaphase, at which point they separated. No poleward movement of the chromatids was observed, and at telophase they passively moved to one of the daughter cells and were enclosed in a micronucleus. The daughter cell containing the micronucleus was then isolated by micromanipulation and followed through subsequent mitoses. At the next mitosis, two chromosomes, each with two chromatids, condensed in the micronucleus. These chromosomes did not attach to the spindle and showed chromatid separation, but no poleward movements at anaphase. They were again enclosed in micronuclei at telophase. The third generation mitosis was similar to the second. Occasionally, both the irradiation-produced and naturally occurring micronuclei exhibited no chromosome condensation at mitosis. Feulgen-stained monolayers of PtK2 cells with naturally occurring micronuclei showed that some micronuclei stain positive for DNA and others do not. This finding raises questions about the fate of chromosomes in a micronucleus.     

Micromanipulation of mitotic chromosomes in PTK2 cells using laser-induced optical forces ("optical tweezers")

To study the potential use of optical forces to manipulate chromosome movement, we have used a Nd:YAG laser at a wavelength of 1.06 microns focused into a phase contrast microscope. Metaphase and anaphase chromosomes were exposed while being monitored by video microscopy. The results indicated that when optical forces were applied to late-moving metaphase chromosomes on the side closest to the nearest spindle pole, the trapped chromosomes initiated movement to the metaphase plate. The chromosome velocities were two to eight times the normal rate depending on the chromosome size, geometry, and trapping site. At the initiation of anaphase, a pair of chromatids could be held by the optical trap and kept motionless throughout anaphase while the other pairs of chromatids separated and moved to opposite spindle poles. As a result, the trapped chromosome either was incorporated into one of the daughter cells or was lost in the cleavage furrow, or the two chromatids eventually separated and moved to their respective daughter cells. If the trap was removed at the beginning of anaphase B, the chromosome moved back to the poles. Our experiments demonstrate that the laser-induced optical force trap is a potential new technique to study noninvasively the mitotic spindle of living cells.     

Correct spindle elongation at the metaphase/anaphase transition is an APC-dependent event in budding yeast.

At the metaphase to anaphase transition, chromosome segregation is initiated by the splitting of sister chromatids. Subsequently, spindles elongate, separating the sister chromosomes into two sets. Here, we investigate the cell cycle requirements for spindle elongation in budding yeast using mutants affecting sister chromatid cohesion or DNA replication. We show that separation of sister chromatids is not sufficient for proper spindle integrity during elongation. Rather, successful spindle elongation and stability require both sister chromatid separation and anaphase-promoting complex activation. Spindle integrity during elongation is dependent on proteolysis of the securin Pds1 but not on the activity of the separase Esp1. Our data suggest that stabilization of the elongating spindle at the metaphase to anaphase transition involves Pds1-dependent targets other than Esp1.     

Bub3 Is a Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Protein Regulating Chromosome Segregation during Mouse Oocyte Meiosis

In mitosis, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) prevents anaphase onset until all chromosomes have been attached to the spindle microtubules and aligned correctly at the equatorial metaphase plate. The major checkpoint proteins in mitosis consist of mitotic arrest-deficient (Mad)1–3, budding uninhibited by benzimidazole (Bub)1, Bub3, and monopolar spindle 1(Mps1). During meiosis, for the formation of a haploid gamete, two consecutive rounds of chromosome segregation occur with only one round of DNA replication. To pull homologous chromosomes to opposite spindle poles during meiosis I, both sister kinetochores of a homologue must face toward the same pole which is very different from mitosis and meiosis II. As a core member of checkpoint proteins, the individual role of Bub3 in mammalian oocyte meiosis is unclear. In this study, using overexpression and RNA interference (RNAi) approaches, we analyzed the role of Bub3 in mouse oocyte meiosis. Our data showed that overexpressed Bub3 inhibited meiotic metaphase-anaphase transition by preventing homologous chromosome and sister chromatid segregations in meiosis I and II, respectively. Misaligned chromosomes, abnormal polar body and double polar bodies were observed in Bub3 knock-down oocytes, causing aneuploidy. Furthermore, through cold treatment combined with Bub3 overexpression, we found that overexpressed Bub3 affected the attachments of microtubules and kinetochores during metaphase-anaphase transition. We propose that as a member of SAC, Bub3 is required for regulation of both meiosis I and II, and is potentially involved in kinetochore-microtubule attachment in mammalian oocytes.     

Cytological evidence for assortment mitosis leading to loss of heterozygosity in rice.

In the root meristem cells of the rice line AMR, which causes loss of heterozygosity in its hybrids, both normal and assortment mitoses were observed. During normal mitosis, chromosomes did not form homologous pairs at metaphase; all chromosomes lined up at the equatorial plate and 2 chromatids of each chromosome disjoined at the centromere and moved toward opposite poles. During assortment mitosis, varying numbers of paired homologues were observed at mitotic metaphase. Two groups of 12 chromosomes separated and moved towards the opposite poles of daughter cells with few chromosomes having their chromatids separated at anaphase. These observations support the proposed mechanism that is responsible for early genotype fixation in rice hybrids involving AMR.     

Dynein participates in chromosome segregation in fission yeast

Background information. In eukaryotic cells, proper formation of the spindle is necessary for successful cell division. For faithful segregation of sister chromatids, each sister kinetochore must attach to microtubules that extend to opposite poles (chromosome bi‐orientation). At the metaphase—anaphase transition, cohesion between sister chromatids is removed, and each sister chromatid is pulled to opposite poles of the cell by microtubule‐dependent forces. Results. We have studied the role of the minus‐end‐directed motor protein dynein by analysing kinetochore dynamics in fission yeast cells deleted for the dynein heavy chain (Dhc1) or the light chain (Dlc1). In these mutants, we found an increased frequency of cells showing defects in chromosome segregation, which leads to the appearance of lagging chromosomes and an increased rate of chromosome loss. By following simultaneously kinetochore dynamics and localization of the checkpoint protein Mad2, we provide evidence that dynein function is not necessary for spindle‐assembly checkpoint inactivation. Instead, we have demonstrated that loss of dynein function alters chromosome segregation and activates the Mad2‐dependent spindle‐assembly checkpoint. Conclusions. These results show an unexpected role for dynein in the control of chromosome segregation in fission yeast, most probably operating during the process of bi‐orientation during early mitosis.