Evolution of tRNA recognition systems and tRNA gene sequences

The aminoacylation of tRNAs by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases recapitulates the genetic code by dictating the association between amino acids and tRNA anticodons. The sequences of tRNAs were analyzed to investigate the nature of primordial recognition systems and to make inferences about the evolution of tRNA gene sequences and the evolution of the genetic code. Evidence is presented that primordial synthetases recognized acceptor stem nucleotides prior to the establishment of the three major phylogenetic lineages. However, acceptor stem sequences probably did not achieve a level of sequence diversity sufficient to faithfully specify the anticodon assignments of all 20 amino acids. This putative bottleneck in the evolution of the genetic code may have been alleviated by the advent of anticodon recognition. A phylogenetic analysis of tRNA gene sequences from the deep Archaea revealed groups that are united by sequence motifs which are located within a region of the tRNA that is involved in determining its tertiary structure. An association between the third anticodon nucleotide (N36) and these sequence motifs suggests that a tRNA-like structure existed close to the time that amino acid-anticodon assignments were being established. The sequence analysis also revealed that tRNA genes may evolve by anticodon mutations that recruit tRNAs from one isoaccepting group to another. Thus tRNA gene evolution may not always be monophyletic with respect to each isoaccepting group.Based on a presentation made at a workshop— Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases and the Evolution of the Genetic Code—held at Berkeley, CA, July 17–20, 1994 Correspondence to: M.E. Saks     

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases: versatile players in the changing theater of translation

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases attach amino acids to the 3' termini of cognate tRNAs to establish the specificity of protein synthesis. A recent Asilomar conference (California, January 13-18, 2002) discussed new research into the structure-function relationship of these crucial enzymes, as well as a multitude of novel functions, including participation in amino acid biosynthesis, cell cycle control, RNA splicing, and export of tRNAs from nucleus to cytoplasm in eukaryotic cells. Together with the discovery of their role in the cellular synthesis of proteins to incorporate selenocysteine and pyrrolysine, these diverse functions of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases underscore the flexibility and adaptability of these ancient enzymes and stimulate the development of new concepts and methods for expanding the genetic code.     

tRNA genes and the genetic code

The genetic code describes translational assignments between codons and amino acids. tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are those molecules by means of which these assignments are established. Any aaRS recognizes its tRNAs according to some of their nucleotides called identity elements (IEs). Let a 1Mut-similarity Sim (1Mut) be the average similarity between such tRNA genes whose codons differ by one point mutation. We showed that: (1) a global maximum of Sim (1Mut) is reached at the standard genetic code 27 times for 4 sets of IEs of tRNA genes of eukaryotic species, while it is so only 5 times for similarities Sim (C&R) between all tRNA genes whose codons lie in the same column or row of the code. Therefore, point mutations of anticodons were tested by nature to recruit tRNAs from one isoaccepting group to another, (2) because plain similarities Sim (all) between tRNA genes of species within any of the three domains of life are higher than between tRNA genes of species belonging to different domains, tRNA genes retained information about early evolution of cells, (3) we searched the order of tRNAs in which they were most probably assigned to their codons and amino acids. The beginning Ala, (Val), Pro, Ile, Lys, Arg, Trp, Met, Asp, Cys, (Ser) of our resulting chronology lies under a plateau on a graph of Sim (1Mut,IE)(univ.ancestors) plotted over this chronology for a set S(IE) of all IEs of tRNA genes, whose universal ancestors were separately computed for each codon. This plateau has remained preserved along the whole line of evolution of the code and is consistent with observations of Ribas de Pouplana and Schimmel [2001. Aminoacy1-tRNA synthetases: potential markers of genetic code development. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 591-598] that specific pairs of aaRSs-one from each of their two classes-can be docked simultaneously onto the acceptor stem of tRNA and hence an interaction existed between their ancestors using a reduced code, (4) sharpness of a local maximum of Sim (1Mut) at the standard code is almost 100% along our chronologies.     

Why termination tRNAs have not been found? Because they are hidden in the large ribosomal RNA

It is well known that protein synthesis in ribosomes on mRNA requires two kinds of tRNAs: initiation and elongation. The former initiates the process (formylmethionine tRNA in prokaryotes and special methionine tRNA in eukaryotes). The latter participates in the synthesis proper, recognizing the sense codons. The synthesis is assisted by special proteins: initiation, elongation, and termination factors. The termination factors are necessary to recognize stop codons (UAG, UGA, and UAA) and to release the complete protein chain from the elongation tRNA preceding a stop codon. No termination tRNA capable of recognizing stop codons by its anticodon is known. The termination factors are thought to do this. We discovered in the large ribosomal RNA two regions that, like tRNAs, contain the anticodon hairpin, but with triplets complementary to stop codons. By analogy, we called them termination tRNAs (Ter-tRNA1 and Ter-tRNA2), though they transport no amino acids, and suggested them to directly recognize stop codons. The termination factors only condition such a recognition, making it specific and reliable (of course, they fulfill the hydrolysis of the ester bond between the polypeptide and tRNA). A strong argument in favor of our hypothesis came from vertebrate mitochondria. They acquired two new stop codons, AGA and AGG (in the standard code, they are two out of six arginine codons). We revealed that the corresponding anticodons appear in Ter-tRNA1.     

Why Termination tRNAs Have Not Been Found? Because They Are Hidden in the Large Ribosomal RNA (A Hypothesis)

It is well known that protein synthesis in ribosomes on mRNA requires two kinds of tRNAs: initiation and elongation. The former initiates the process (formylmethionine tRNA in prokaryotes and special methionine tRNA in eukaryotes). The latter participates in the synthesis proper, recognizing the sense codons. The synthesis is assisted by special proteins: initiation, elongation, and termination factors. The termination factors are necessary to recognize stop codons (UAG, UGA, and UAA) and to release the complete protein chain from the elongation tRNA preceding a stop codon. No termination tRNA capable of recognizing stop codons by its anticodon is known. The termination factors are thought to do this. We discovered in the large ribosomal RNA two regions that, like tRNAs, contain the anticodon hairpin, but with triplets complementary to stop codons. By analogy, we called them termination tRNAs (Ter-tRNA1 and Ter-tRNA2), though they transport no amino acids, and suggested them to directly recognize stop codons. The termination factors only condition such recognition to make it specific and reliable (of course, they fulfill the hydrolysis of the ester bond between the polypeptide and tRNA). A strong argument in favor of our hypothesis came from vertebrate mitochondria. They acquired two new stop codons, AGA and AGG (in the standard code, they are two out of six arginine codons). We revealed that the corresponding anticodons appear in Ter-tRNA1.     

Evolutionary processes possibly limiting the kinds of amino acids in protein to twenty: a review.

Only 20 of more than 250 biosynthetic amino acids are common (coded) constituents of contemporary protein. In this paper, several stages of evolution, both prebiotic and biotic, are examined for means by which other (non-proteinous) amino acids may have been selected against. Simulated prebiotic experiments indicate that some non-proteinous amino acids were present prebiotically, that they could be incorporated during the formation of prebiotic protein, and that they would function in such protein. Biotic selection is thus indicated.Non-proteinous amino acids currently are available via biosynthetic pathways for potential incorporation into bioprotein. Codon-anticodon interaction, peptidyl transferases, and elongation and termination factors of protein synthesis do not show the specificity needed to preclude non-proteinous amino acids. Highly specific recognition among amino acids, tRNAs, and activating enzymes is concluded to be why the kinds of amino acids in contemporary protein are limited to twenty.Some of several theories concerning the origin, nature and evolution of the genetic code can readily accommodate non-proteinous amino acids. Some evidence suggests that such amino acids were eventually eliminated from protein because they were less suitable than related proteinous amino acids. However, deterministic or “direct interaction” theories currently lack sufficient experimental support to answer how non-proteinous amino acids were precluded; such theories, being testable, probably have the most potential for providing an answer.     

Genomics and the evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis.

Translation is the process by which ribosomes direct protein synthesis using the genetic information contained in messenger RNA (mRNA). Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are charged with an amino acid and brought to the ribosome, where they are paired with the corresponding trinucleotide codon in mRNA. The amino acid is attached to the nascent polypeptide and the ribosome moves on to the next codon. Thus, the sequential pairing of codons in mRNA with tRNA anticodons determines the order of amino acids in a protein. It is therefore imperative for accurate translation that tRNAs are only coupled to amino acids corresponding to the RNA anticodon. This is mostly, but not exclusively, achieved by the direct attachment of the appropriate amino acid to the 3'-end of the corresponding tRNA by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. To ensure the accurate translation of genetic information, the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases must display an extremely high level of substrate specificity. Despite this highly conserved function, recent studies arising from the analysis of whole genomes have shown a significant degree of evolutionary diversity in aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis. For example, non-canonical routes have been identified for the synthesis of Asn-tRNA, Cys-tRNA, Gln-tRNA and Lys-tRNA. Characterization of non-canonical aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis has revealed an unexpected level of evolutionary divergence and has also provided new insights into the possible precursors of contemporary aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.     

Codons and Hypercycles

Several hypotheses on the origin of codon assignments imply that the present protein synthesizing machinery was already in place when the assignments were made. These are examined by computer modeling. The results do not suggest that assignments were optimized for resistance to reading and mutation errors, nor that the assignments are random. It is improbable that the number of species of amino acids increased in the course of evolution. An originally ambiguous dictionary is likely to have been subject to error catastrophe and is improbable. A relation between amino acid properties and their codons exists, and suggests that the codon assignments were established at the time of origin of the hypercycle, i.e. a system of aminoacyl synthetases which attaches amino acids to tRNA, and before the present protein synthesizing machinery was in place. The origin of a hypercycle is only possible if the system began with components which were catalytically active even when they did not form a self-replicating system. A model of such a system is proposed.     

The non-monophyletic origin of the tRNA molecule

The hypothesis that the tRNA molecule may have originated from the assembly of two similar RNA hairpin structures is utilised to understand the evolutionary period in which this molecule originated. Consistent with the exon theory of genes is the observation that the introns in tRNA genes are found almost exclusively in the anticodon loop and "stitched together" the two halves of the molecule, which originally may have been simply two hairpin structures and which can still be observed in the three-dimensional structure of tRNAs. This theory therefore considers these hairpin structures as minigenes on which complex protein synthesis may have been achieved. This in turn leads to the belief that the organisation of the genetic code may have been determined by use of the hairpin structures but not the complete tRNA molecule. In view of this, it can be conjectured that tRNA molecules might have been assembled only after the establishment of the main phyletic lines. If this is all true, then the origin of the tRNA molecule might have been non-monophyletic, i.e. a tRNA specific for a certain amino acid might have been assembled in different phyletic lines with a second and different hairpin structure. This leads to the belief that tRNAs specific for different amino acids but belonging to the same phyletic line might have been more similar to one another than to tRNAs specific for the same amino acid but belonging to different phyletic lines. This prediction seems to be supported by phylogenetic analysis making major use of the bootstrap technique performed on the tRNA sequences and by analysis already existing in the literature which supports the non-monophyletic origin of the tRNA molecule. The main conclusion of this paper is that if the tRNA molecule was assembled in the main phyletic lines this would imply a still rapidly evolving translation apparatus which, in turn, seems to imply that the last universal common ancestor was a progenote.     

The impact of including tRNA content on the optimality of the genetic code

Statistical and biochemical studies have revealed nonrandom patterns in codon assignments. The canonical genetic code is known to be highly efficient in minimizing the effects of mistranslational errors and point mutations, since it is known that, when an amino acid is converted to another due to error, the biochemical properties of the resulted amino acid are usually very similar to those of the original one. In this study, we have taken into consideration both relative frequencies of amino acids and relative gene copy frequencies of tRNAs in genomic sequences in order to introduce a fitness function which models the mistranslational probabilities more accurately in modern organisms. The relative gene copy frequencies of tRNAs are used as estimates of the tRNA content. We also altered the rule previously used for the calculation of the probabilities of single base mutation occurrences. Our model signifies higher optimality of the genetic code towards load minimization and suggests the presence of a coevolution of tRNA frequency and the genetic code.     

Relationships Among Isoacceptor tRNAs Seems to Support the Coevolution Theory of the Origin of the Genetic Code

A new method for looking at relationships between nucleotide sequences has been used to analyze divergence both within and between the families of isoaccepting tRNA sets. A dendrogram of the relationships between 21 tRNA sets with different amino acid specificities is presented as the result of the analysis. Methionine initiator tRNAs are included as a separate set. The dendrogram has been interpreted with respect to the final stage of the evolutionary pathway with the development of highly specific tRNAs from ambiguous molecular adaptors. The location of the sets on the dendrogram was therefore analyzed in relation to hypotheses on the origin of the genetic code: the coevolution theory, the physicochemical hypothesis, and the hypothesis of ambiguity reduction of the genetic code. Pairs of 16 sets of isoacceptor tRNAs, whose amino acids are in biosynthetic relationships, occupied contiguous positions on the dendrogram, thus supporting the coevolution theory of the genetic code. Received: 4 May 1998 / Accepted: 11 July 1998     

Polynucleotide replication coupled to protein synthesis: A possible mechanism for the origin of life

A mechanism is suggested for the replication under primitive conditions of long polynucleotides by the sequential incorporation of sequences related to those of modern transfer RNAs. It is proposed that replication of such molecules became established as the result of a replicative advantage arising from the concomitant linkage together of amino acids to form polypeptides. Initially these polypeptides may have been of random sequence. Selection of primitive tRNAs in which the amino acid and anticodon stem sequences were rotaionally symmetrical could have led to specific, anticodon-directed aminoacylation and fixation of the genetic code along the lines suggested by Hopfield. (Hopfield, 1978). The primitive replication-coupled system would then have been able to synthesize specific proteins containing one amino acid residue for each primitive tRNA incorporated during replication. The end result of this line of evolution is postulated to have been a nucleoprotein structure resembling the ribosome. The primitive system would then have been able to give rise directly to triplet-coded protein synthesis. Some recent RNA sequence data are discussed which are consistent with derivation of modern protein synthesis from the primitive replication-coupled mechanism.     

The Early Phases of Genetic Code Origin: Conjectures on the Evolution of Coded Catalysis

A review of the most significant contributions on the early phases of genetic code origin is presented. After stressing the importance of the key intermediary role played in protein synthesis, by peptidyl-tRNA, which is attributed with a primary function in ancestral catalysis, the general lines leading to the codification of the first amino acids in the genetic code are discussed. This is achieved by means of a model of protoribosome evolution which sees protoribosome as the central organiser of ancestral biosynthesis and the mediator of the encounter between compounds (metabolite-pre-tRNAs) and catalysts (peptidyl-pre-tRNAs). The encounter between peptidyl-pre-tRNA catalysts in protoribosome is favoured by metabolic pre-mRNAs and later resulted (given the high temperature at which this evolution is supposed to have taken place) in the evolution of mRNAs with codons of the type GNS. These mRNAs codified only for those amino acids that the coevolution theory of genetic code origin sees as the precursors of all other amino acids. Some aspects of the model here discussed might be rendered real by the transfer-messenger RNA molecule (tmRNA) which is here considered a molecular fossil of ancestral protein synthesis.     

A model for the coevolution of the genetic code and the process of protein synthesis: Review and assessment

The contemporary genetic code and the process of protein biosynthesis most assuredly evolved from a simpler code and process. We believe that there was obligatory coevolution of the two and that the earlier code and process must have involved a more direct linkage between the amino acids and the informational macromolecule. We propose that an early form of translating existed in which amino acids were attached directly to the ‘messenger’ RNA along the backbone as 2'OH aminoacyl esters. These esters then condensed with each other on the RNA backbone yielding a peptide covalently attached to the RNA, without the use of tRNAs and ribosomes. This presentation is concerned with experimental data which indicate that such a simple translation system is possible and must have involved the following steps: (1) formation of the aminoacyl adenylate anhydride, (2) transfer of the amino acid from the adenylate to imidazole, (3) transfer of the amino acid from imidazole to 2'OH groups along the backbone of RNAs (4) condensation of the amino acids to yield peptides. Steps (1)–(3) have been confirmed in chemical systems. Our preliminary evidence indicates step (4) is also possible. The aminoacylation of polyribonucleotides and the subsequent formation of peptides is a dynamic and experimentally accessible system for studying genetic coding specifities and our present studies are now concentrated on step (4), looking for such specifities.     

The origin of the protein synthesis mechanism

The origin and development of the protein synthesis mechanism is considered in four successive steps. The genetic code is supposed to be controlled by the relative amount (availability) of various amino acids and nucleotides on the one hand, and utility on each amino acid in the polypeptide. on the other hand. Thus, more simple (inutile) and abundant amino acids tended to correspond to codons which were rich in the less frequent base species, G and C. Features of primitive tRNA in the discrimination of amino acid are discussed. Primitive tRNA is proposed to have a discriminator site for amino acid and, separated from it, an anticodon site for interaction with nucleotides. A hypothetical course of subdivision of various nucleic acid species is proposed. In the scheme, mRNA and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) were derived from more primitive insoluble RNA. DNA appeared in the late, not first, step of the development. Several other aspects of evolutionary development of the whole protein synthesis mechanism, e.g., role of the discriminator site on primitive tRNA, modification and subdivision of code catalogue into a more precise specification of amino acids, and possible primordial interactions between tRNA and tRNA-binding sites on insoluble rRNA, are discussed.     

Metabolic Basis for the Self-Referential Genetic Code

An investigation of the biosynthesis pathways producing glycine and serine was necessary to clarify an apparent inconsistency between the self-referential model (SRM) for the formation of the genetic code and the model of coevolution of encodings and of amino acid biosynthesis routes. According to the SRM proposal, glycine was the first amino acid encoded, followed by serine. The coevolution model does not state precisely which the first encodings were, only presenting a list of about ten early assignments including the derivation of glycine from serine—this being derived from the glycolysis intermediate glycerate, which reverses the order proposed by the self-referential model. Our search identified the glycine-serine pathway of syntheses based on one-carbon sources, involving activities of the glycine decarboxylase complex and its associated serine hydroxymethyltransferase, which is consistent with the order proposed by the self-referential model and supports its rationale for the origin of the genetic code: protein synthesis was developed inside an early metabolic system, serving the function of a sink of amino acids; the first peptides were glycine-rich and fit for the function of building the early ribonucleoproteins; glycine consumption in proteins drove the fixation of the glycine-serine pathway.     

Accuracy of tRNA Charging and Codon: Anticodon Recognition; Relative Importance for Cellular Stability

Cellular homeostasis and the mechanisms which control homeostasis are important for understanding such fundamental processes as ageing and the origin of life. Several models have studied the importance of accurate protein synthesis for cellular stability, but these models have not considered the complexities of the translation process in any detail. Here we develop a new model which describes the interplay between aminoacyl-tRNA (aatRNA) synthetases, the cellular pool of charged tRNAs and the process of codon:anticodon recognition. We also take the processive character of the ribosomes into account. In common with previous work, our model predicts that the cellular translation apparatus can either be stable or deteriorate progressively with time. However, because our model explicitly describes different subreactions of the overall translation process, we are also able to assess the relative importance of accurate tRNA charging and codon:anticodon recognition for cellular stability. It appears that the tRNA charging by the aatRNA synthetases plays the key role in controlling the long-term stability of the cell. Ribosomal errors are less important because error-prone ribosomes, being processive, produce mainly inactive proteins which do not contribute to error propagation within the translation machinery.     

A biophysical basis for the emergence of the genetic code in protocells

The origin of the genetic code is an abiding mystery in biology. Hints of a ‘code within the codons’ suggest biophysical interactions, but these patterns have resisted interpretation. Here, we present a new framework, grounded in the autotrophic growth of protocells from CO₂ and H₂. Recent work suggests that the universal core of metabolism recapitulates a thermodynamically favoured protometabolism right up to nucleotide synthesis. Considering the genetic code in relation to an extended protometabolism allows us to predict most codon assignments. We show that the first letter of the codon corresponds to the distance from CO₂ fixation, with amino acids encoded by the purines (G followed by A) being closest to CO₂ fixation. These associations suggest a purine-rich early metabolism with a restricted pool of amino acids. The second position of the anticodon corresponds to the hydrophobicity of the amino acid encoded. We combine multiple measures of hydrophobicity to show that this correlation holds strongly for early amino acids but is weaker for later species. Finally, we demonstrate that redundancy at the third position is not randomly distributed around the code: non-redundant amino acids can be assigned based on size, specifically length. We attribute this to additional stereochemical interactions at the anticodon. These rules imply an iterative expansion of the genetic code over time with codon assignments depending on both distance from CO₂ and biophysical interactions between nucleotide sequences and amino acids. In this way the earliest RNA polymers could produce non-random peptide sequences with selectable functions in autotrophic protocells.     

A mechanism for stop codon recognition by the ribosome: a bioinformatic approach.

Protein synthesis in ribosomes requires two kinds of tRNAs: initiation and elongation. The former initiates the process (formylmethionine tRNA in prokaryotes and special methionine tRNA in eukaryotes). The latter participates in the synthesis proper, recognizing the sense codons. Synthesis is also assisted by special proteins: initiation, elongation, and termination factors. The termination factors are necessary to recognize stop codons (UAG, UGA, and UAA) and to release the complete protein chain from the elongation tRNA preceding a stop codon. No termination tRNA capable of recognizing stop codons by their anticodons is known. The termination factors are thought to do this. In the large ribosomal RNA, we found two sites that, like tRNAs, contain the anticodon hairpin but with triplets complementary to stop codons. One site is hairpin 69 from domain IV; the other site is hairpin 89, domain V. By analogy, we call them termination tRNAs: Ter-tRNA1 and Ter-tRNA2, respectively, even though they transport no amino acids, and suggest that they directly pair to stop codons. The termination factors only aid in this recognition, making it specific and reliable. A strong argument in favor of our hypothesis comes from vertebrate mitochondria. They are known to acquire two new stop codons, AGA and AGG. In the standard code, these are two out of six arginine codons. We revealed that the corresponding anticodons, UCU and CCU, have evolved in Ter-tRNA1 of these mitochondria.