Inhibition of mutant BRAF splice variant signaling by next‐generation,selective RAF inhibitors

Vemurafenib and dabrafenib block MEK‐ERK1/2 signaling and cause tumor regression in the majority of advanced‐stage BRAF^V600E melanoma patients; however, acquired resistance and paradoxical signaling have driven efforts for more potent and selective RAF inhibitors. Next‐generation RAF inhibitors, such as PLX7904 (PB04), effectively inhibit RAF signaling in BRAF^V600E melanoma cells without paradoxical effects in wild‐type cells. Furthermore, PLX7904 blocks the growth of vemurafenib‐resistant BRAF^V600E cells that express mutant NRAS. Acquired resistance to vemurafenib and dabrafenib is also frequently driven by expression of mutation BRAF splice variants; thus, we tested the effects of PLX7904 and its clinical analog, PLX8394 (PB03), in BRAF^V600E splice variant‐mediated vemurafenib‐resistant cells. We show that paradox‐breaker RAF inhibitors potently block MEK‐ERK1/2 signaling, G1/S cell cycle events, survival and growth of vemurafenib/PLX4720‐resistant cells harboring distinct BRAF^V600E splice variants. These data support the further investigation of paradox‐breaker RAF inhibitors as a second‐line treatment option for patients failing on vemurafenib or dabrafenib.     

Apoptosis of human melanoma cells induced by inhibition of B-RAFV600E involves preferential splicing of bimS

Bim is known to be critical in killing of melanoma cells by inhibition of the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway. However, the potential role of the most potent apoptosis-inducing isoform of Bim, Bim_S, remains largely unappreciated. Here, we show that inhibition of the mutant B-RAF^V600E triggers preferential splicing to produce Bim_S, which is particularly important in induction of apoptosis in B-RAF^V600E melanoma cells. Although the specific B-RAF^V600E inhibitor PLX4720 upregulates all three major isoforms of Bim, Bim_EL, Bim_L, and Bim_S, at the protein and mRNA levels in B-RAF^V600E melanoma cells, the increase in the ratios of Bim_S mRNA to Bim_EL and Bim_L mRNA indicates that it favours Bim_S splicing. Consistently, enforced expression of B-RAF^V600E in wild-type B-RAF melanoma cells and melanocytes inhibits Bim_S expression. The splicing factor SRp55 appears necessary for the increase in Bim_S splicing, as SRp55 is upregulated, and its inhibition by small interfering RNA blocks induction of Bim_S and apoptosis induced by PLX4720. The PLX4720-induced, SRp55-mediated increase in Bim_S splicing is also mirrored in freshly isolated B-RAF^V600E melanoma cells. These results identify a key mechanism for induction of apoptosis by PLX4720, and are instructive for sensitizing melanoma cells to B-RAF^V600E inhibitors.     

SHOC2 and CRAF Mediate ERK1/2 Reactivation in Mutant NRAS-mediated Resistance to RAF Inhibitor

ERK1/2 signaling is frequently dysregulated in tumors through BRAF mutation. Targeting mutant BRAF with vemurafenib frequently elicits therapeutic responses; however, durable effects are often limited by ERK1/2 pathway reactivation via poorly defined mechanisms. We generated mutant BRAF^V600E melanoma cells that exhibit resistance to PLX4720, the tool compound for vemurafenib, that co-expressed mutant (Q61K) NRAS. In these BRAF^V600E/NRAS^Q61K co-expressing cells, re-activation of the ERK1/2 pathway during PLX4720 treatment was dependent on NRAS. Expression of mutant NRAS in parental BRAF^V600 cells was sufficient to by-pass PLX4720 effects on ERK1/2 signaling, entry into S phase and susceptibility to apoptosis in a manner dependent on the RAF binding site in NRAS. ERK1/2 activation in BRAF^V600E/NRAS^Q61K cells required CRAF only in the presence of PLX4720, indicating a switch in RAF isoform requirement. Both ERK1/2 activation and resistance to apoptosis of BRAF^V600E/NRAS^Q61K cells in the presence of PLX4720 was modulated by SHOC-2/Sur-8 expression, a RAS-RAF scaffold protein. These data show that NRAS mutations confer resistance to RAF inhibitors in mutant BRAF cells and alter RAF isoform and scaffold molecule requirements to re-activate the ERK1/2 pathway.     

Regulating the response to targeted MEK inhibition in melanoma: Enhancing apoptosis in NRAS- and BRAF-mutant melanoma cells with Wnt/β-catenin activation

The limitations of revolutionary new mutation-specific inhibitors of BRAF^V600E include the universal recurrence seen in melanoma patients treated with this novel class of drugs. Recently, our lab showed that simultaneous activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and targeted inhibition of BRAF^V600E by PLX4720 synergistically induces apoptosis across a spectrum of BRAF^V600E melanoma cell lines. As a follow-up to that study, treatment of BRAF-mutant and NRAS-mutant melanoma lines with WNT3A and the MEK inhibitor AZD6244 also induces apoptosis. The susceptibility of BRAF-mutant lines and NRAS-mutant lines to apoptosis correlates with negative regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by ERK/MAPK signaling and dynamic decreases in abundance of the downstream scaffolding protein, AXIN1. Apoptosis-resistant NRAS-mutant lines can sensitize to AZD6244 by pretreatment with AXIN1 siRNA, similar to what we previously reported in BRAF-mutant cell lines. Taken together, these findings indicate that NRAS-mutant melanoma share with BRAF-mutant melanoma the potential to regulate apoptosis upon MEK inhibition through WNT3A and dynamic regulation of cellular AXIN1. Understanding the cellular context that makes melanoma cells susceptible to this combination treatment will contribute to the study and development of novel therapeutic combinations that may lead to more durable responses.     

Inhibition of both BRAF and MEK in BRAFV600E mutant melanoma restores compromised dendritic cell (DC) function while having differential direct effects on DC properties

Purpose

Dendritic cells (DCs) can induce strong tumor-specific T-cell immune responses. Constitutive upregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway by a BRAF^V600 mutation, which is present in about 50 % of metastatic melanomas, may be linked to compromised function of DCs in the tumor microenvironment. Targeting both MEK and BRAF has shown efficacy in BRAF^V600 mutant melanoma.

Methods

We co-cultured monocyte-derived human DCs with melanoma cell lines pretreated with the MEK inhibitor U0126 or the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. Cytokine production (IL-12 and TNF-α) and surface marker expression (CD80, CD83, and CD86) in DCs matured with the Toll-like receptor 3/Melanoma Differentiation-Associated protein 5 agonist polyI:C was examined. Additionally, DC function, viability, and T-cell priming capacity were assessed upon direct exposure to U0126 and vemurafenib.

Results

Cytokine production and co-stimulation marker expression were suppressed in polyI:C-matured DCs exposed to melanoma cells in co-cultures. This suppression was reversed by MAPK blockade with U0126 and/or vemurafenib only in melanoma cell lines carrying a BRAF^V600E mutation. Furthermore, when testing the effect of U0126 directly on DCs, marked inhibition of function, viability, and DC priming capacity was observed. In contrast, vemurafenib had no effect on DC function across a wide range of dose concentrations.

Conclusions

BRAF^V600E mutant melanoma cells modulate DC through the MAPK pathway as its blockade can reverse suppression of DC function. MEK inhibition negatively impacts DC function and viability if applied directly. In contrast, vemurafenib does not have detrimental effects on important functions of DCs and may therefore be a superior candidate for combination immunotherapy approaches in melanoma patients.     

Reversing melanoma cross-resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors by co-targeting the AKT/mTOR pathway

Background

The sustained clinical activity of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib (PLX4032/RG7204) in patients with BRAF^V600 mutant melanoma is limited primarily by the development of acquired resistance leading to tumor progression. Clinical trials are in progress using MEK inhibitors following disease progression in patients receiving BRAF inhibitors. However, the PI3K/AKT pathway can also induce resistance to the inhibitors of MAPK pathway.

Methodology/Principal Findings

The sensitivity to vemurafenib or the MEK inhibitor AZD6244 was tested in sensitive and resistant human melanoma cell lines exploring differences in activation-associated phosphorylation levels of major signaling molecules, leading to the testing of co-inhibition of the AKT/mTOR pathway genetically and pharmacologically. There was a high degree of cross-resistance to vemurafenib and AZD6244, except in two vemurafenib-resistant cell lines that acquired a secondary mutation in NRAS. In other cell lines, acquired resistance to both drugs was associated with persistence or increase in activity of AKT pathway. siRNA-mediated gene silencing and combination therapy with an AKT inhibitor or rapamycin partially or completely reversed the resistance.

Conclusions/Significance

Primary and acquired resistance to vemurafenib in these in vitro models results in frequent cross resistance to MEK inhibitors, except when the resistance is the result of a secondary NRAS mutation. Resistance to BRAF or MEK inhibitors is associated with the induction or persistence of activity within the AKT pathway in the presence of these drugs. This resistance can be potentially reversed by the combination of a RAF or MEK inhibitor with an AKT or mTOR inhibitor. These combinations should be available for clinical testing in patients progressing on BRAF inhibitors.     

Loss of PI(4,5)P2 5-Phosphatase A Contributes to Resistance of Human Melanoma Cells to RAF/MEK Inhibitors

Past studies have shown that the inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase (PIB5PA), is commonly downregulated or lost in melanomas, which contributes to elevated activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt in melanoma cells. In this report, we provide evidence that PIB5PA deficiency plays a role in resistance of melanoma cells to RAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors. Ectopic expression of PIB5PA enhanced apoptosis induced by the RAF inhibitor PLX4720 in BRAF^V600E and by the MEK inhibitor U0126 in both BRAF^V600E and wild-type BRAF melanoma cells. This was due to inhibition of PI3K/Akt, as co-introduction of an active form of Akt (myr-Akt) abolished the effect of overexpression of PIB5PA on apoptosis induced by PLX4720 or U0126. While overexpression of PIB5PA triggered activation of Bad and down-regulation of Mcl-1, knockdown of Bad or overexpression of Mcl-1 recapitulated, at least in part, the effect of myr-Akt, suggesting that regulation of Bad and Mcl-1 is involved in PIB5PA-mediated sensitization of melanoma cells to the inhibitors. The role of PIB5PA deficiency in BRAF inhibitor resistance was confirmed by knockdown of PIB5PA, which led to increased growth of BRAF^V600E melanoma cells selected for resistance to PLX4720. Consistent with its role in vitro, overexpression of PIB5PA and the MEK inhibitor selumetinib cooperatively inhibited melanoma tumor growth in a xenograft model. Taken together, these results identify loss of PIB5PA as a novel resistance mechanism of melanoma to RAF/MEK inhibitors and suggest that restoration of PIB5PA may be a useful strategy to improve the therapeutic efficacy of the inhibitors in the treatment of melanoma.     

Receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer escape from BRAF inhibitors

The BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) induce anti-tumor responses in nearly 60% of patients with advanced ^V600BRAF-mutant melanomas but only 5% of patients with ^V600BRAF-mutant colorectal carcinomas. Earlier studies of how a subset of melanoma that initially responds to BRAFi but later acquires drug resistance pointed to the importance of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in drug escape. In a pair of recent reports, this RTK-mediated mechanism of acquired BRAFi resistance in melanoma is re-surfacing in the context of innate or primary BRAFi resistance in ^V600BRAF-mutant colorectal carcinomas, suggesting potential upfront therapeutic strategies to prevent BRAFi resistance.^V600BRAF mutations are found in >50% of melanomas, nearly 100% of hairy cell leukemias but smaller subsets of more common human malignancies (e.g., colorectal, thyroid)¹. The in-human “druggability” of mutant BRAF has been best demonstrated in metastatic BRAF mutant melanomas using the novel small-molecule BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) PLX4032/vemurafenib, producing survival benefits². Early clinical results of BRAFi in colorectal carcinoma, however, were disappointing, with only 5% of patients (1 of 21 patients) experiencing a partial response and 19% of patients (4 of 21 patients) experiencing minor responses³. This difference in the clinical results (melanoma vs. colorectal carcinoma) may relate less to their ontological origins but more to alternative states of a dynamic and plastic survival signaling network.The majority of BRAF mutant melanomas responds to BRAFi rapidly but acquires drug resistance within a median time of 6-7 months. The specific mechanisms of acquired BRAFi resistance are variegated but fall under two core pathways: 1) reactivation of RAF-MEK-ERK MAPK signaling, and 2) activation of MAPK-redundant signaling via the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-PI3K-AKT pathway, which is parallel but interconnected to the MAPK pathway. MAPK reactivation can occur via NRAS activating mutations⁴, COT overexpression⁵, ^V600BRAF alternative splicing⁶, ^V600BRAF amplification⁷, and MEK1 activating mutation^8,9. MAPK-redundant signaling via RTK overexpression has been shown to result in AKT activation and RAS-CRAF-MEK signaling, bypassing mutant BRAF^4,10,11. The repertoire of RTK overexpressed appears restricted but shares a common pattern of PDGFRβ and EGFR overexpression, at least in melanoma cell lines with acquired resistance to vemurafenib⁴. It is unclear at present how this overexpression of a select number of wild-type RTKs contributes to the molecular details of survival pathway redundancy and cooperativity. Nevertheless, understanding how melanomas acquire BRAFi resistance via core pathways may shed key insights into mechanisms of innate BRAFi resistance in multiple malignancies. Hence, it came as not a complete surprise that a pair of papers published recently implicated RTKs in innate BRAFi resistance in colorectal cancer cell lines^12,13. Both studies pointed to EGFR activation and downstream signaling as a key component to innate BRAFi resistance, at least in a majority of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cell lines examined.Corcoran et al.¹² showed that BRAF mutant CRC cell lines, in contrast to BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines, displayed innate resistance to growth inhibition by vemurafenib. An important clue implicating RTK involvement in innate vemurafenib resistance of BRAF mutant CRC cell lines came from the observation that p-ERK recovery occurred soon (hours to days) after vemurafenib treatment, unlike the kinetics of p-ERK recovery in BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines. This relatively rapid recovery of p-ERK post vemurafenib treatment in CRC cell lines is akin to that in melanoma cell lines with acquired BRAFi resistance driven by RTK overexpresion¹⁰. Corcoran et al. then traced this propensity for early p-ERK recovery to vemurafenib treatment (24 h)-dependent enhancement of (activated) RAS-GTP levels and MEK activity, parallel to elevated RAS-GTP levels in melanoma cell lines with RTK-driven, acquired BRAFi resistance⁴. In phospho-RTK arrays, they determined that the p-EGFR level (among others such as p-c-MET and p-IGF1R levels) was elevated in CRC cell lines relative to those in melanoma cells. Vemurafenib treatment (24 h) did not significantly enhance the p-EGFR level (but did elevate the p-IGFR1 level). Elevated p-EGFR levels in BRAF mutant CRC cell lines were correlated with elevated total EGFR levels (i.e., overexpressed compared with BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines). Thus, several observations correlated with innate BRAFi resistance in CRC cell lines: RTK (mostly consistently EGFR) overexpression (at baseline); upregulation of activation-associated phosphorylation of RTKs (at baseline); and upregulation of RAS-GTP levels (in response to BRAFi treatment). Curiously, although EGFR is highly phosphorylated at baseline, the RAS-GTP levels only rose in response to vemurafenib treatment.Corcoran et al. further showed that small-molecule EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi) could downregulate, partially or completely, the RAS-GTP level induced by vemurafenib treatment. The combination of vemurafenib (BRAFi) and gefitnib (EGFRi) could synergistically reduce p-ERK levels and the net growth inhibition of most but not all CRC cell lines studied, suggesting that survival in some CRC cell lines may also depend on other RTKs and downstream signaling (e.g., AKT). Consistently, the combination of vemurafenib and erlotinib (EGFRi) stabilized the growth of, but did not cause significant regression of, CRC xenografts. Simultaneous inhibition or genetic knockdown of multiple RTKs was not explored, leaving unresolved the issue of how multiple RTKs may potentially play cooperative survival roles at baseline or in response to kinase inhibitor therapy.Prahallad et al.¹³ also compared CRC and melanoma cell lines and showed that EGFR expression is generally higher in CRC cell lines. Vemurafenib treatment (6 h) of the WiDr CRC cell line led to an induction in p-EGFR and p-AKT levels, concomitant with the expected suppression of p-MEK and p-ERK. MEK inhibition, by AZD6244 treatment, similarly led to the rebound phosphorylation of EGFR. Based on earlier literature showing that the ERK kinase phosphorylates Cdc25c, activating its phosphatase activity, and that Cdc25c can dephosphorylate EGFR, Prahallad et al. went on to show that Cdc25c knockdown mimicked vemurafenib treatment in inducing p-EGFR levels. As predicted, vemurafenib treatment of CRC cell line inhibited Cdc25c phosphorylation at a key threonine (Thr 48), which was previously demonstrated to be a key event for its phosphatase activity. Addition of an EGFRi (cetuximab or gefitnib) to the BRAFi vemurafenib treatment downregulated the baseline level of p-ERK and the BRAFi-induced p-AKT level (but not the baseline p-AKT level). Moreover, addition of an EGFRi sensitized CRC cell lines to growth inhibition by vemurafenib in vitro but did not induce tumor regression in vivo, again suggesting incomplete survival signaling blockade. Accordingly, it has been shown that the effect of vemurafenib in shrinking CRC tumor xenografts was enhanced by combining with an AKT inhibitor (MK-2206)¹⁴. Moreover, in this study, the addition of vemurafenib to erlotinib treatment also resulted in increased anti-tumor activity and improved survival in xenograft models. It should be pointed out that Prahallad et al. did not formally assess BRAFi and EGFRi synergy, nor did they examine the diversity of RTK overexpression/activity and its contribution to downstream survival signaling (e.g., AKT).These works, along with prior studies^4,10, highlight the importance of expression and activity level of RTKs as a key sensitivity determinant of BRAFi resistance in BRAF mutant cancer cell lines (Figure 1). An important question remains as to whether the diversity of RTK overexpression and/or upregulation participates in and contributes to the full BRAFi resistance phenotype. A recent study afforded us a systems-wide view of the RTKinome reprogramming in response to MEK inhibition in the so-called triple-negative breast cancer cell lines¹⁵. The balance of the MAPK vs. RTK network signaling may be dynamically influenced by kinase inhibitors targeting RAF or MEK. This daunting diversity of RTK expression/activity may corner us into abandoning a combination of RTK inhibitors (already approved for clinical usage) with a BRAF inhibitor. Instead, we might need to resort to downstream pathway inhibitors not yet approved for clinical usage (e.g., an inhibitor of MEK with an inhibitor of the PI3K-AKT-mTORC1/2 axis) before we have a chance to corner BRAF mutant cancers into death.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Upregulation of receptor tyrosine kinase(s) (RTKs) as a key sensitivity determinant of BRAFi resistance in BRAF mutant cancer cell lines. (A) In BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines, RTKs are generally expressed at very low levels and contribute minimally to survival signaling, resulting in a strong addiction to mutant BRAF signaling and sensitivity to BRAFi. When BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines acquire BRAFi resistance, they upregulate the expression and activity of PDGFRb and other RTKs, resulting in reactivation of MEK-ERK as well as MAPK-redundant PI3K-AKT survival signaling. (B) In BRAF mutant colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cell lines, EGFR and other RTKs are upregulated by overexpression and some level of activation, resulting in MAPK-redundant survival signaling and conferring innate or primary BRAFi resistance. Treatment of CRC cell lines wth a BRAF or a MEK inhibitor can further activate EGFR and potentially other RTKs and stimulate GTP-RAS levels, consolidating innate BRAFi resistance. Red denotes mutated protein (e.g., BRAF); gray symbols denote weak signaling or interactions; multiplicity of protein symbols denotes overexpression; P in blue denotes activation-associated phosphorylation.     

The BRAFV600E inhibitor,PLX4032, increases type I collagen synthesis in melanoma cells

Vertical growth phase (VGP) melanoma is frequently metastatic, a process mediated by changes in gene expression, which are directed by signal transduction pathways in the tumor cells. A prominent signaling pathway is the Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk MAPK pathway, which increases expression of genes that promote melanoma progression. Many melanomas harbor a mutation in this pathway, BRAF^V600E, which constitutively activates MAPK signaling and expression of downstream target genes that facilitate tumor progression. In BRAF^V600E melanoma, the small molecule inhibitor, vemurafenib (PLX4032), has revolutionized therapy for melanoma by inducing rapid tumor regression. This compound down-regulates the expression of many genes. However, in this study, we document that blocking the Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk MAPK pathway, either with an ERK (PLX4032) or a MEK (U1026) signaling inhibitor, in BRAF^V600E human and murine melanoma cell lines increases collagen synthesis in vitro and collagen deposition in vivo. Since TGFß signaling is a major mediator of collagen synthesis, we examined whether blocking TGFß signaling with a small molecule inhibitor would block this increase in collagen. However, there was minimal reduction in collagen synthesis in response to blocking TGFß signaling, suggesting additional mechanism(s), which may include activation of the p38 MAPK pathway. Presently, it is unclear whether this increased collagen synthesis and deposition in melanomas represent a therapeutic benefit or an unwanted “off target” effect of inhibiting the Ras-Raf-Erk-Mek pathway.     

Evaluating Melanoma Drug Response and Therapeutic Escape with Quantitative Proteomics

The evolution of cancer therapy into complex regimens with multiple drugs requires novel approaches for the development and evaluation of companion biomarkers. Liquid chromatography-multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (LC-MRM) is a versatile platform for biomarker measurement. In this study, we describe the development and use of the LC-MRM platform to study the adaptive signaling responses of melanoma cells to inhibitors of HSP90 (XL888) and MEK (AZD6244). XL888 had good anti-tumor activity against NRAS mutant melanoma cell lines as well as BRAF mutant cells with acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors both in vitro and in vivo. LC-MRM analysis showed HSP90 inhibition to be associated with decreased expression of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, modules in the PI3K/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, and the MAPK/CDK4 signaling axis in NRAS mutant melanoma cell lines and the inhibition of PI3K/AKT signaling in BRAF mutant melanoma xenografts with acquired vemurafenib resistance. The LC-MRM approach targeting more than 80 cancer signaling proteins was highly sensitive and could be applied to fine needle aspirates from xenografts and clinical melanoma specimens (using 50 μg of total protein). We further showed MEK inhibition to be associated with signaling through the NFκB and WNT signaling pathways, as well as increased receptor tyrosine kinase expression and activation. Validation studies identified PDGF receptor β signaling as a potential escape mechanism from MEK inhibition, which could be overcome through combined use of AZD6244 and the PDGF receptor inhibitor, crenolanib. Together, our studies show LC-MRM to have unique value as a platform for the systems level understanding of the molecular mechanisms of drug response and therapeutic escape. This work provides the proof-of-principle for the future development of LC-MRM assays for monitoring drug responses in the clinic.Despite excitement about the development of targeted therapy strategies for cancer, few cures have been achieved. In patients with BRAF mutant melanoma, treatment with small molecule BRAF inhibitors typically follows a course of response and tumor shrinkage followed by eventual relapse and resistance (mean progression-free survival is ∼5.3 months) (1). Resistance to BRAF inhibitors is typically accompanied by reactivation of the MAPK signaling pathway, an effect mediated through activating mutations in NRAS and MEK1/2, genomic amplification of BRAF, increased expression of CRAF and Cot, and the acquisition of BRAF splice-form mutants (2–5). There is also evidence that increased PI3K/AKT signaling, resulting from the genetic inactivation of PTEN and NF1 and increased receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)¹ signaling, may be involved in acquired BRAF inhibitor resistance (5–7). Many of the signaling proteins implicated in the escape from BRAF inhibitor therapy are clients of heat shock protein (HSP)-90 (8). Preclinical evidence now indicates that HSP90 inhibitors can overcome acquired and intrinsic BRAF inhibitor resistance, and clinical trials have been initiated to evaluate the BRAF/HSP90 combination in newly diagnosed patients (8, 9).Although targeted therapy strategies have been promising in BRAF mutant melanoma, few options currently exist for the 15–20% of melanoma patients whose tumors harbor activating NRAS mutations (10). Although there is some evidence that MEK inhibitors have activity in NRAS mutant melanoma patients, responses tend to be short-lived (mean progression-free survival ∼3 months) and resistance is nearly inevitable (11). Our emerging experience suggests that oncogene-driven signaling networks are highly robust with the capacity to rapidly adapt (12, 13). The future success of targeted therapy for melanoma and other cancers will depend upon the development of strategies that identify and overcome these adaptive escape mechanisms.The evaluation of targeted therapy responses in patients has proved to be challenging. The clinical development of HSP90 inhibitors has been hampered in part by the lack of a good pharmacodynamic assay for measuring HSP90 inhibition within tumor specimens (14). Additionally, very little is known about the adaptive changes that occur following the inhibition of MEK/ERK signaling in NRAS mutant melanoma. To address these issues, the optimal technique is liquid chromatography-multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry, which been shown to be highly reproducible and portable across laboratories (15–18).In addition to these technical developments, LC-MRM has also been shown to have excellent application to the study of biological pathways, including phosphotyrosine signaling, β-catenin signaling in colon cancer, and the evasion of apoptosis following BRAF inhibition in PTEN null melanoma (19–21). This technique can also be readily translated from cell line models to patient specimens. Here, we have developed a novel multiplexed LC-MRM assay to quantify the expression of >80 key signaling proteins in cell line models and fine needle aspirates from accessible melanoma lesions (22). In this study, we present the proof-of-principle for monitoring multiple signaling proteins in melanomas treated with either HSP90 or MEK inhibitors. Through this method, we identify the degradation of key HSP90 client proteins in vivo and elucidate a novel mechanism of adaptation to MEK inhibition through increased RTK signaling.     

NHE1 mediates MDA-MB-231 cells invasion through the regulation of MT1-MMP

Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger 1 (NHE1), an important regulator of intracellular pH (pH_i) and extracellular pH (pH_e), has been shown to play a key role in breast cancer metastasis. However, the exact mechanism by which NHE1 mediates breast cancer metastasis is not yet well known. We showed here that inhibition of NHE1 activity, with specific inhibitor Cariporide, could suppress MDA-MB-231 cells invasion as well as the activity and expression of MT1-MMP. Overexpression of MT1-MMP resulted in a distinguished increase in MDA-MB-231 cells invasiveness, but treatment with Cariporide reversed the MT1-MMP-mediated enhanced invasiveness. To explore the role of MAPK signaling pathways in NHE1-mediated breast cancer metastasis, we compared the difference of constitutively phosphorylated ERK1/2, p38 MAPK and JNK in non-invasive MCF-7 cells and invasive MDA-MB-231cells. Interestingly, we found that the phosphorylation levels of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK in MDA-MB-231 cells were higher than in MCF-7 cells, but both MCF-7 cells and MDA-MB-231 cells expressed similar constitutively phosphorylated JNK. Treating MDA-MB-231 cells with Cariporide led to decreased phosphorylation level of both p38 MAPK and ERK1/2 in a time-dependent manner, but JNK activity was not influenced. Supplementation with MAPK inhibitor (MEK inhibitor PD98059, p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 and JNK inhibitor SP600125) or Cariporide all exhibited significant depression of MDA-MB-231 cells invasion and MT1-MMP expression. Furthermore, we co-treated MDA-MB-231 cells with MAPK inhibitor and Cariporide. The result showed that Cariporide synergistically suppressed invasion and MT1-MMP expression with MEK inhibitor and p38 MAPK inhibitor, but not be synergistic with the JNK inhibitor. These findings suggest that NHE1 mediates MDA-MB-231 cells invasion partly through regulating MT1-MMP in ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK signaling pathways dependent manner.     

Regulating the response to targeted MEK inhibition in melanoma

The limitations of revolutionary new mutation-specific inhibitors of BRAF^V600E include the universal recurrence seen in melanoma patients treated with this novel class of drugs. Recently, our lab showed that simultaneous activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and targeted inhibition of BRAF^V600E by PLX4720 synergistically induces apoptosis across a spectrum of BRAF^V600E melanoma cell lines. As a follow-up to that study, treatment of BRAF-mutant and NRAS-mutant melanoma lines with WNT3A and the MEK inhibitor AZD6244 also induces apoptosis. The susceptibility of BRAF-mutant lines and NRAS-mutant lines to apoptosis correlates with negative regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by ERK/MAPK signaling and dynamic decreases in abundance of the downstream scaffolding protein, AXIN1. Apoptosis-resistant NRAS-mutant lines can sensitize to AZD6244 by pretreatment with AXIN1 siRNA, similar to what we previously reported in BRAF-mutant cell lines. Taken together, these findings indicate that NRAS-mutant melanoma share with BRAF-mutant melanoma the potential to regulate apoptosis upon MEK inhibition through WNT3A and dynamic regulation of cellular AXIN1. Understanding the cellular context that makes melanoma cells susceptible to this combination treatment will contribute to the study and development of novel therapeutic combinations that may lead to more durable responses.     

BH3-only protein silencing contributes to acquired resistance to PLX4720 in human melanoma

B-RAF is mutated to a constitutively active form in 8% of human cancers including 50% of melanomas. In clinical trials, the RAF inhibitor, PLX4032 (vemurafenib), caused partial or complete responses in 48–81% of mutant B-RAF harboring melanoma patients. However, the average duration of response was 6–7 months before tumor regrowth, indicating the acquisition of resistance to PLX4032. To understand the mechanisms of resistance, we developed mutant B-RAF melanoma cells that displayed resistance to RAF inhibition through continuous culture with PLX4720 (the tool compound for PLX4032). Resistance was associated with a partial reactivation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) signaling, recovery of G1/S cell-cycle events, and suppression of the pro-apoptotic B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) homology domain 3 (BH3)-only proteins, Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death-extra large (Bim-EL) and Bcl-2 modifying factor (Bmf). Preventing ERK1/2 reactivation with MEK (mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase) inhibitors blocked G1-S cell-cycle progression but failed to induce apoptosis or upregulate Bim-EL and Bmf. Treatment with the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, led to de-repression of Bim-EL and enhanced cell death in the presence of PLX4720 or AZD6244 in resistant cells. These data indicate that acquired resistance to PLX4032/4720 likely involves ERK1/2 pathway reactivation as well as ERK1/2-independent silencing of BH3-only proteins. Furthermore, combined treatment of HDAC inhibitors and MEK inhibitors may contribute to overcoming PLX4032 resistance.     

PKC�� promotes a proliferation to differentiation switch in keratinocytes via upregulation of p27Kip1 mRNA through suppression of JNK/c-Jun signaling under stress conditions

To maintain epidermal homeostasis, the balance between keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation is tightly controlled. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this balance remain unclear. In 3D organotypic coculture with mouse keratinocytes and fibroblasts, the thickness of stratified cell layers was prolonged, and growth arrest and terminal differentiation were delayed when PKCη-null keratinocytes were used. Re-expression of PKCη in PKCη-null keratinocytes restored stratified cell layer thickness, growth arrest and terminal differentiation. We show that in 3D cocultured PKCη-null keratinocytes, p27^Kip1 mRNA was downregulated, whereas JNK/c-Jun signaling was enhanced. Furthermore, inhibition of JNK/c-Jun signaling in PKCη-null keratinocytes led to upregulation of p27^Kip1 mRNA, and to thinner stratified cell layers. Collectively, our findings indicate that PKCη upregulates p27^Kip1 mRNA through suppression of JNK/c-Jun signaling. This results in promoting a proliferation to differentiation switch in keratinocytes.     

ZAKβ is activated by cellular compression and mediates contraction‐induced MAP kinase signaling in skeletal muscle

Mechanical inputs give rise to p38 and JNK activation, which mediate adaptive physiological responses in various tissues. In skeletal muscle, contraction‐induced p38 and JNK signaling ensure adaptation to exercise, muscle repair, and hypertrophy. However, the mechanisms by which muscle fibers sense mechanical load to activate this signaling have remained elusive. Here, we show that the upstream MAP3K ZAKβ is activated by cellular compression induced by osmotic shock and cyclic compression in vitro, and muscle contraction in vivo. This function relies on ZAKβ''s ability to recognize stress fibers in cells and Z‐discs in muscle fibers when mechanically perturbed. Consequently, ZAK‐deficient mice present with skeletal muscle defects characterized by fibers with centralized nuclei and progressive adaptation towards a slower myosin profile. Our results highlight how cells in general respond to mechanical compressive load and how mechanical forces generated during muscle contraction are translated into MAP kinase signaling.     

Glucocorticoid evoked upregulation of RCAN1-1 in human leukemic CEM cells susceptible to apoptosis

Background

Estradiol (E₂) mediates various intracellular signaling cascades from the plasma membrane via several estrogen receptors (ERs). The pituitary is an estrogen-responsive tissue, and we have previously reported that E₂ can activate mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) such as ERK1/2 and JNK1/2/3 in the membrane ERα (mERα)-enriched GH₃/B₆/F₁₀ rat pituitary tumor cell line. Phytoestrogens are compounds found in plants and foods such as soybeans, alfalfa sprouts, and red grapes. They are structurally similar to E₂ and share a similar mechanism of action through their binding to ERs. Phytoestrogens bind to nuclear ERs with a much lower affinity and therefore are less potent in mediating genomic responses. However, little is known about their ability to act via mERs to mediate nongenomic effects.

Methods

To investigate the activation of different nongenomic pathways, and determine the involvement of mERα, we measured prolactin (PRL) release by radio-immunoassay, MAPK activations (ERK1/2 and JNK1/2/3) via a quantitative plate immunoassay, and intracellular [Ca²⁺] by Fura-2 fluorescence imaging in cells treated with E₂ or four different phytoestrogens (coumestrol, daidzein, genistein, and trans-resveratrol).

Results

Coumesterol and daidzein increased PRL release similar to E₂ in GH₃/B₆/F₁₀ cells, while genistein and trans-resveratrol had no effect. All of these compounds except genistein activated ERK1/2 signaling at 1–10 picomolar concentrations; JNK 1/2/3 was activated by all compounds at a 100 nanomolar concentration. All compounds also caused rapid Ca²⁺ uptake, though in unique dose-dependent Ca²⁺ response patterns for several aspects of this response. A subclone of GH₃ cells expressing low levels of mERα (GH₃/B₆/D₉) did not respond to any phytoestrogen treatments for any of these responses, suggesting that these nongenomic effects were mediated via mERα.

Conclusion

Phytoestrogens were much more potent in mediating these nongenomic responses (activation of MAPKs, PRL release, and increased intracellular [Ca²⁺]) via mERα than was previously reported for genomic responses. The unique non-monotonic dose responses and variant signaling patterns caused by E₂ and all tested phytoestrogens suggest that complex and multiple signaling pathways or binding partners could be involved. By activating these different nongenomic signaling pathways, phytoestrogens could have significant physiological consequences for pituitary cell functions.     

Using BRAFV600E as a marker of autophagy dependence in pediatric brain tumors

Autophagy inhibition is a potential therapeutic strategy in central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The BRAF^V600E mutation is known to affect autophagy. Our studies indicate CNS tumor cells with BRAF^V600E mutant cells (but not wild type) display high rates of induced autophagy, are sensitive to autophagy inhibition, and display synergy when chloroquine is combined with the RAF kinase inhibitor vemurafenib or standard chemotherapeutics. Our studies also indicate chloroquine can improve vemurafenib sensitivity in intrinsically resistant cells and in a patient with induced-vemurafenib resistance. These findings suggest CNS tumors with BRAF^V600E are autophagy-dependent and that identification of BRAF^V600E may be a marker to identify pediatric patients with the best potential response to autophagy inhibition.