Detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool samples of young children using real‐time polymerase chain reaction

Background

The aims of this study were to develop and validate a multiplex real‐time polymerase chain reaction (q‐PCR) assay of Helicobacter pylori in stool samples of healthy children. Additionally, we determined the prevalence of clarithromycin resistance and cagA gene in H. pylori‐positive samples.

Materials and methods

Archived stool samples from 188 children aged 6‐9 years and 272 samples of 92 infants aged 2‐18 months were tested for H. pylori antigens using enzyme immunoassay (EIA). A multiplex q‐PCR assay was designed to detect H. pylori 16S rRNA and urease and the human RNase P gene as an internal control. Kappa coefficient was calculated to assess the agreement between q‐PCR and EIA.

Results

Laboratory validation of the q‐PCR assay using quantitated H. pylori ATCC 43504 extracted DNA showed S‐shaped amplification curves for all genes; the limit of detection was 1 CFU/reaction. No cross‐reactivity with other bacterial pathogens was noted. Applying the multiplex q‐PCR to DNA extracted from fecal samples showed clear amplification curves for urease gene, but not for 16S rRNA. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was 50% (95% CI 43%‐57%) by q‐PCR (urease cycle threshold <44) vs 59% (95% CI 52%‐66%) by EIA. Kappa coefficient was .80 (P < .001) and .44 (P < .001) for children aged 6‐9 years and 2‐18 months, respectively. Sixteen samples were positive for cagA and three were positive for clarithromycin resistance mutation (A2143G) as confirmed by sequencing.

Conclusions

The developed q‐PCR can be used as a cotechnique to enhance the accuracy of H. pylori detection in epidemiological studies and in clinical settings.     

大熊猫粪便中元素的对应分析

采用对应分析方法对中国卧龙大熊猫研究中心圈养的大熊猫粪便中的元素以及体重、年龄等十一个变量进行处理,在二维平面上表达总信息的百分之九十以上,大熊猫粪便可分两大类,每一大类又进一步可分为两小类。     

Comparison of two different stool antigen tests for the primary diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in turkish patients with dyspepsia

AIM: To assess the reliability of two different enzyme immunoassays in detecting the Helicobacter pylori status in stool specimens of Turkish patients with dyspepsia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one patients [74 with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD), 64 with duodenal ulcer (DU) and 13 with gastric cancer] who were admitted to the endoscopy unit of Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy because of dyspepsia were enrolled in the study. Helicobacter pylori infection was confirmed in all patients by histology, rapid urease test and culture. A patient was classified as being H. pylori-positive if the culture alone or both the histology and the rapid urease test were positive and as negative only if all of these tests remained negative. Stool samples were obtained from patients to assess the reliability of a monoclonal (FemtoLab H. pylori) and a polyclonal (Premier Platinum HpSA) stool antigen test and to compare the diagnostic accuracies of these two tests. A chi2 test was used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Using cut-off values of 0.19 for FemtoLab H. pylori and 0.16 for Premier Platinum HpSA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 93%, 90%, 98%, 68% and 93% for the monoclonal test and 84%, 67%, 94%, 40% and 81% for the polyclonal test, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of the monoclonal test were significantly greater than those of the polyclonal test (chi2 = 3.98; p < .05 for sensitivity and chi2 = 15.67; p = .000 for specificity, chi2 = 15.78; p = .000 for negative predictive value and chi2 = 6.37; p = .012 for diagnostic accuracy). The bacterial load did not affect the sensitivity of either test. CONCLUSIONS: The monoclonal FemtoLab H pylori test, using a cut-off 0.19, is a very sensitive, specific and easy to perform diagnostic tool for the primary diagnosis of H. pylori infection in Turkish patients with dyspepsia.     

Application of real-time PCR stool assay for Helicobacter pylori detection and clarithromycin susceptibility testing in Brazilian children

Background: Helicobacter pylori ClariRes assay is a novel commercially available real‐time PCR assay allowing H. pylori detection and clarithromycin susceptibility testing in either gastric biopsy or stool specimens. Objective: The aim of this study was to validate the novel biprobe real‐time assay in stool specimens from 217 dyspeptic children. Methods: DNA from gastric biopsies and stool specimens were obtained and submitted to the biprobe real time assay for H. pylori detection and clarithromycin susceptibility testing. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and test accuracy were 69, 100 and 93.9% for the detection of H. pylori infection and 83.3, 100 and 95.6%, for detection of clarithromycin resistance. Conclusion: This assay proved to be appropriate for H. pylori clarithromycin susceptibility testing, particularly in children populations where a high prevalence of clarithromycin‐resistant strains is suspected.     

Usefulness of non-invasive tests for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection in patients undergoing dialysis for chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection in chronic renal failure patients has been linked to peptic ulcer and gastric neoplasia after kidney transplantation. It may also contribute to the accelerated arteriosclerosis that is usual in this population. Few data are available on the usefulness of noninvasive diagnostic tests for H. pylori infection in dialyzed patients, especially regarding the new fecal antigen detection tests. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of a noninvasive test for H. pylori infection in patients with chronic renal failure. METHODS: Eighty-six patients were included in a cross-sectional study. Urea breath test, serology and three fecal tests--FemtoLab H. pylori (Connex, Germany), Premier Platinum HpSA (Meridian, USA) and Simple H. pylori (Operon SA, Spain) were performed. Helicobacter pylori status was determined by concordance of the tests. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each test. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 94%, 96%, 94% and 96% for the urea breath test; 97%, 64%, 66% and 97% for serology; 86%, 100%, 100% and 91%, for FemtoLab H. pylori; 58%, 96%, 91% and 76% for Premier Platinum HpSA and 61%, 78%, 74% and 67% for Simple H. pylori. CONCLUSIONS: The urea breath test seems to be the most reliable diagnostic method for H. pylori infection in patients with chronic renal failure. Serology has a low specificity, and the results of the fecal tests vary widely.     

Oxalate-degrading Enterococcus faecalis

An oxalate-degrading Enterococcus faecalis was isolated from human stools under anaerobic conditions. The bacteria required a poor nutritional environment and repeated subculturing to maintain their oxalate-degrading ability. The E. faecalis produced 3 proteins (65, 48, and 40 kDa) that were not produced by non-oxalate-degrading E. faecalis as examined by SDS-PAGE. Antibodies against oxalyl-coenzyme A decarboxylase (65 kDa) and formyl-coenzyme A transferase (48 kDa) obtained from Oxalobacter formigenes (an oxalate-degrading anaerobic bacterium in the human intestine) reacted with 2 of the proteins (65 and 48 kDa) from the E. faecalis as examined by Western blottings. This is the first report on the isolation of oxalate-degrading facultative anaerobic bacteria from humans.     

Polymerase chain reaction--restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori infection in children using stool sample

BACKGROUND: To analyze clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori infection in children, we developed a method of polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis using stool samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three children without significant upper abdominal symptoms were included (mean age 7.0 years). Of these, 18 and five were diagnosed as H. pylori-positive and -negative, respectively, by the H. pylori stool antigen test (HpSA). The DNA from the stool samples was purified using the QIAamp DNA Stool Minikit (QIAGEN). The PCR was performed on the purified DNA using oligonucleotide primers designed to amplify the 23S rRNA gene of H. pylori. The PCR products were reacted with restriction enzymes MboII, BceAI, and BsaI to detect mutations A2142G, A2142C, and A2143G, respectively. RESULTS: Sixteen of the 18 HpSA-positive samples were PCR-positive, and all five HpSA-negative samples were PCR-negative. Thus, the PCR had 89% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with 91% accuracy in reference to HpSA. Of the 16 PCR-positive samples, one and four were digested with MboII and BsaI, respectively, indicating 31% prevalence of CAM-resistance. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the PCR-RFLP using stool samples is a rapid and reliable method to noninvasively detect clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori infection in children. It may be useful before choosing regimens of H. pylori eradication.     

Evaluation of a new antigen for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in stool of adult and children

Background: Nowadays, there is an increasing interest in noninvasive methods to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection. Indeed, they can profitably replace endoscopy in predicting the diagnosis. The stool antigen test for H. pylori is a noninvasive immunoassay to diagnose active infection with this bacterium in human fecal samples. The aim of this study was detection of alkyl hydroperoxide reductase protein (AhpC) antigen by immunoblotting in stool samples for diagnosis of H. pylori. Materials and Methods: Chromosomal DNA from H. pylori was isolated. AhpC gene was amplified by PCR, These amplicons were cloned into pTZ57R/T cloning vector then subcloned into pQE30 expression vector and overexpressed using isopropyl‐beta‐D‐thiogalactopyranoside in E. coli M15. AhpC protein was purified by affinity chromatography. Rabbits were immunized with the purified AhpC protein for the production of antibodies. To determine the accuracy of the test for diagnosing H. pylori infection from stool, we evaluated 84 patients (6–81 years old) using Western blot analysis by rabbit anti‐AhpC antibody. Positive rapid urease test on biopsy samples was considered as the gold standard. Results: AhpC gene was overexpressed, and AhpC protein was purified. Rabbit anti‐AhpC antibody produced after immunization with the purified AhpC protein. By immunoblotting, we detected AhpC protein in the positive stool samples. The test showed a 83.3% sensitivity (95% CI: 69.8–92.5%) and a 91.7% specificity (95% CI: 77.5–98.2). Among the children, the sensitivity was 88.2% (95% CI: 63.6–98.5) and the specificity was 100% (95% CI: 69.2–100); in adults, the sensitivity and specificity were 80.6% (95% CI: 62.5–92.5) and 88.5% (95% CI: 69.8–97.6), respectively. Conclusions: Using of AhpC antigen for diagnosis of H. pylori infection is a useful noninvasive method, accurate in adolescents and children, and can be used for the development of a stool antigen detection kit for H. pylori.     

Evaluation of stool antigen test, PCR on ORAL samples and serology for the noninvasive detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in children

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. We evaluated three noninvasive tests in a group of children: the immunoassay for detection of H. pylori stool antigen, the polimerase chain reaction for identification of bacterial DNA on the oral cavity and the serum specific antibodies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety children underwent endoscopy for various gastrointestinal symptoms. H. pylori stool antigen and anti-H. pylori antibodies were assayed by commercial kits. The bacterial DNA on saliva and oral plaque was detected by a seminested PCR. RESULTS: Based on the positivity of culture or urease rapid test and histology, infection was detected in 47 patients. The statistical analysis showed that, for the detection of the infection, stool antigen assay is more effective in sensitivity and negative predictive value (91.5% and 96.5%), whereas specificity and positive predictive values appear slightly better in serology (89.6% and 76.0%). Correlations between serum IgG both with patients' age (r = 0.21, p < .05) and H. pylori stool antigen (r = 0.47, p < .01) were found. The search for bacterial DNA on oral samples proved to be very specific (99.1% on saliva and 98.2% on plaque), but insensitive (22.2% and 25.7%). CONCLUSIONS. In children H. pylori stool antigen represents a sensitive test, suitable for detecting H. pylori infection. Serum IgG proved to be more specific; the PCR on the oral cavity resulted as being a very specific, but insensitive test.     

Comparison of a Stool Antigen Test and Serology for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Mass Survey

Background: Serum antibody to Helicobacter pylori is tested in mass screening for gastric cancer along with the level of serum pepsinogens (PG) I and II. Recently, stool antigen tests have been developed as a new non-invasive test. We examined H. pylori infection by both serology and stool antigen test in a mass survey and compared the results to estimate applicability of stool antigen test for mass survey.
Methods: A total of 994 healthy adults who received mass survey in April 2005 were tested. There were 379 men and 615 women, and the mean age was 57.7 years old. Stool samples were used to measure a H. pylori- specific antigen by enzyme immunoassay. Serum samples were tested for the prevalence of IgG antibody to H. pylori , and the level of PGs I and II was also measured to determine the presence of atrophic gastritis.
Results: Infection of H. pylori was defined as positive 61.4% and 56.4% by serology and stool antigen test, respectively. The concordance of both tests was not affected by gender and age of the subjects but difference was seen in subjects with atrophic gastritis. In particular, positivity of stool antigen test (81.8%) was significantly lower than that of serology (88.7%, p  < .05) in 303 subjects with severe atrophic gastritis.
Conclusions: Stool antigen test, which detects present but not previous infection of H. pylori , would be applicable to diagnose H. pylori infection in mass survey. Usefulness of stool antigen tests for the screening of gastric cancer should be examined.     

Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA by a simple stool PCR method in adult dyspeptic patients

INTRODUCTION: Helicobacter pylori is the major agent causing peptic ulcer, gastric cancer and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) gastric lymphoma. A simple stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was performed and compared with the gold standards for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 54 adult patients (mean age, 46.41 +/- 13.12 years) with dyspeptic symptoms from Gastroenterology at Dokuz Eylül University Hospital between May and November 2003 were included. Two antrum and corpus biopsies were taken from each patient. Infection by H. pylori was defined as positivity and negativity of the gold standards. DNA extraction of stool specimens was done using QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN) and PCR conditions included amplification and reamplification steps using the H. pylori ureA gene specific primers (HPU1, HPU2) and were visualized on 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. RESULTS: Forty-six of 54 patients (85.2%) were diagnosed positive and eight (14.8%) were negative for H. pylori infection by the gold standard methods. Thirty-two patients were positive (59.3%) and 22 of them (40.7%) were detected negative by stool PCR method. The stool PCR method and gold standard methods showed a statistical difference for the detection of H. pylori infection (p < .0001). Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and positive and negative predictive values were 65.22%, 75%, 2.61%, 93.75%, and 27.7%, respectively. DISCUSSION: The PCR on the stool specimens resulted as being a very specific test. We suggest that a simple stool PCR method that we developed can be used to detect H. pylori, virulence genes, and in drug resistance studies either first line diagnostic methods in the laboratory or in the clinical management of dyspeptic patients.     

Detection of specific Helicobacter pylori DNA and antigens in stool samples in dyspeptic patients and healthy subjects

In this study stool samples from dyspeptic patients and healthy subjects were used for detection of specific Helicobacter pylori antigens and DNA by immunoenzymatic test (PPHpSA) and semi-nested PCR (ureA-PCR), respectively. The H. pylori status was estimated by invasive endoscopy-based rapid urease test and histology or noninvasive urea breath test (UBT), and by serology (ELISA, Western blot). The coincidence of H. pylori-negative invasive tests or UBT and negative antigen or DNA stool tests was very high (mean 95%). The PPHpSA results were found positive for 56% and ureA-PCR for 26% of individuals with H. pylori infection confirmed by invasive tests or UBT. The detection of specific H. pylori antigens and especially DNA in feces is not sufficient as a one-step diagnosis of H. pylori infection.     

Helicobacter pylori in School Children From the Western Province of Sri Lanka

Background. Little is known about the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in Sri Lanka and nothing is known about its prevalence in children. Therefore the prevalence of H. pylori in a group of school children in Sri Lanka was determined. Materials and Methods. The presence of H. pylori colonisation was determined by detection of faecal antigen and salivary antibody (IgG) by enzyme immuno assay, in 184 children aged between 5 and 19 years, in the Western Province‐Colombo district of Sri Lanka. Results. Overall, only 12/184 (6.5%) had detectable H. pylori antigen in their stools and were considered infected with H. pylori, while 51/184 (27.7%) had H. pylori IgG in saliva. H. pylori salivary IgG declined with age while H. pylori antigen detection increased with age. H. pylori infection, as determined by salivary antibody (66%), was greater in children living in overcrowded conditions, although this was not statistically significant. Conclusion. The prevalence of H. pylori among school children in Sri Lanka was 6.5% by detection of faecal antigen and 27.7% by detection of salivary antibody, respectively. Initial infection with H. pylori appeared to occur in early childhood whilst active disease began in late childhood. Overcrowding appears to facilitate the transmission of the organism. Overall the prevalence of H. pylori was low in Sri Lanka compared with other countries in South‐east Asia.