Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Review of the World Literature

Background. None of the currently used anti- Helicobacter pylori drug regimens cures the infection 100%, and cure results still vary considerably. The present article reviews the effectiveness of currently used antimicrobial regimens, aimed to cure H. pylori infection.
Methods. Data collection started from the beginning of the anti- H. pylori -therapy era until May 1995. No attempt at formal metanalysis has been made, because many studies have been published only in abstract form. Attempts were made to exclude duplicates of studies by comparison to previously reported ones; the authors of suspected duplicates were contacted. After amalgamation of the number of included patients and the number of successfully treated patients, the mean values of eradication rates and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Results. A total of 237 treatment arms were analyzed. Bismuth triple therapy continues to reach high eradication rates worldwide (78–89%). Side effects leading to diminished patient compliance and the marked decline of eradication efficacy in cases of metronidazole resistance are considered to be the major drawbacks of this therapy. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dual therapy is better tolerated with fewer side effects than is bismuth triple therapy. The mean eradication rates vary from 55 to 75%, and the extremes lie between 24 and 93%. PPI triple therapies have been shown to be very effective against H. pylori (eradication rates, 80–89%). Quadruple therapy leads to a mean eradication rate of 96%.
Conclusion. Based on efficacy, PPI triple or bismuth triple therapy are recommended as first-line treatment for H. pylori infection. Quadruple therapy could serve as second-line treatment for eradication of initial failures and in case of metronidazole resistance.     

Challenges to therapy in the future

Quadruple therapy (with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), metronidazole, tetracycline and bismuth) is generally reserved for second-line treatment; however, studies using this regimen for 7 days have found it to be effective even in metronidazole-resistant strains. Resistance is an ongoing problem with antimicrobial therapy but considerable progress has now been made into understanding the underlying genetic mechanisms of this process. Metronidazole resistance in Europe is usually in the range of 20-30% of strains but may be as high as 70% in some countries. One genetic mechanism involved is thought to be a mutation of the rdxA gene. Macrolide resistance appears to be on the increase in Europe, varying from 1% in some countries to 13% in others. The genetic mechanism involved has been shown to be a point mutation of a ribosomal RNA. Amoxicillin resistance is an emerging problem that has an adverse effect on eradication rates in clinical practice. Resistance has been shown to be caused by the absence of one of the four binding proteins in the cell wall. Few novel antibiotics have been developed for use in eradication therapy, although rifabutin, secnidazole and furazolidone have shown some success as part of combination therapy. Alternative therapies that have been tested include mucosal protective agents which have been used in place of a PPI in some eradication regimens with some success, and the somatostatin analog, octreotide, that has been used as part of quadruple therapy in place of a PPI and produced eradication rates of approximately 88%. The ultimate challenge is still to develop a safe and effective vaccine against Helicobacter pylori. Current and future research will also focus on identifying genetic targets for therapy, adhesion molecule analogs to prevent binding of the bacterium, and urease inhibitors. The current triple therapy treatment options available for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection are over 90% effective in susceptible organisms and there are very few medical conditions to which we can offer such efficacious treatment. Unfortunately, the recommendations made at consensus conferences are not always put into practice and physicians in primary care may be unaware of the true efficacy of eradication therapy. Treatment is very simple: three drugs, twice a day for 1 week. The main focus for both primary care physicians and gastroenterologists should be to reinforce the need for patient compliance, otherwise we will see an increase in antibiotic resistance. Patients should be prewarned that they may experience some mild side effects and should be encouraged to complete the course of treatment. The real challenge for the future will be the management of patients who do not respond to first-line treatment. This paper will focus on potential problems with therapy, such as antibiotic resistance, and possible future solutions, such as novel antibiotics and vaccines.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection

This article aims to examine current best practice in the field reference to first-line, second-line, rescue and emerging treatment regimens for Helicobater pylori eradication. The recommended first-line treatment in published guidelines in Europe and North American is proton pump inhibitor combined with amoxicillin and clarithromycin being the favoured regimen. Rates of eradication with this regimen however are falling alarmingly due to a combination of antibiotic resistance and poor compliance with therapy. Bismuth based quadruple therapies and levofloxacin based regimes have been shown to be effective second line regimens. Third-line options include regimes based on rifabutin or furazolidone, but susceptibility testing is the most rational option here, but is currently not used widely enough. Sequential therapy is promising but needs further study and validation outside of Italy. Although the success of first line treatments is falling, if compliance is good and a clear treatment paradigm adhered to, almost universal eradication rates can still be achieved. If compliance is not achievable, the problem of antibiotic resistance will continue to beset any combination of drugs used for H. pylori eradication.     

Rabeprazole Can Overcome the Impact of CYP2C19 Polymorphism on Quadruple Therapy

Objectives: The prospective study was designed to clarify the impact of CYP2C19 on quadruple therapies and survey the efficacies of rabeprazole‐based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of standard triple therapies. Patients and Methods: From January 2007 to March 2009, 1055 H. pylori‐infected patients received standard triple regimens (proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin). Helicobacter pylori eradication was achieved in 865 (81.9%) subjects. One hundred ninety eradication‐failure patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a 7‐day eradication therapy. Ninety‐six patients were treated with esomeprazole‐based quadruple rescue therapies (EB), while 94 patients were treated with rabeprazole‐based quadruple rescue therapies (RB). Follow‐up endoscopy was done 16 weeks later to assess the treatment response. Patients’ responses, CYP2C19 genotypes, and antibiotics resistances were also examined. Results: Intention‐to‐treat analysis revealed that RB had better eradication rates than EB (EB: 72.9%; 95% CI: 64.9–80.9% and RB: 78.7%; 95% CI 72.5–84.9%) (p value = .543). Per‐protocol results were EB = 75.3%; 95% CI: 70.3–80.3% and RB = 85.1%; 95% CI: 80.6–89.6% (p value = .0401). Both regimens had similar compliance (p value = 0.155) and adverse events (p value = 0.219). We also surveyed those patients without resistance of any antibiotics. RB still showed better outcome than EB. Our data showed that esomeprazole‐based regimen and CYP2C19 Hom EM genotype were important predictors for eradication failure. Conclusions: In quadruple therapy, rabeprazole‐based regimens had better efficacy than esomeprazole‐based regimens. CYP2C19 polymorphism also played an important role in quadruple therapy. It seems advisable to change PPI to rabeprazole in second‐line quadruple therapy.     

2-week triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection is better than 1-week in clinical practice: a large prospective single-center randomized study

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapies are considered the standard regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication, but the optimal duration of these regimens is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 1-week versus 2-week triple therapies in H. pylori-positive patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 486 consecutive H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to receive omeprazole, 20 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and either amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. or metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d. for 1 or 2 weeks. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and histology were performed at entry and 2 months after the end of therapy. H. pylori status was defined according to histology and urea breath test. RESULTS: At intention-to-treat analysis, 2-week therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin achieved a significantly higher eradication rate than 1- or 2-week regimens with metronidazole (70% versus 52%, p = .003, versus 56%, p < .01) and the same therapy for 1-week (70% versus 57%, p = .05). At per-protocol analysis, 2-week therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin showed a significantly higher eradication rate than 1-week of amoxicillin and metronidazole (77% versus 62%; p = .03) but no difference with 1-week same regimen (66%) or 2-week metronidazole and clarithromycin regimen (72%). Compliance and tolerability were good for all regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Two-week therapies, independently of antibiotic combination, lead to a significant increase of H. pylori eradication rate compared to 1-week therapies, with same compliance and tolerability, even if, taking account of low-eradication rates, one must question whether the triple therapy should still be used.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection

Antibiotic resistance has resulted in unsatisfactory eradication results with dual and now triple therapy in many countries. Newer antibiotics and changes in dosing and duration of therapy may overcome resistant strains but may only provide limited improvement in eradication rates. Sequential therapy with amoxicillin (1 g twice a day) and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (twice a day) given for 5 days followed by a PPI plus clarithromycin (500 mg twice a day) and tinidazole (500 mg twice a day) for 5 days is now a first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori in some countries. Standard triple therapy is effective in regions where clarithromycin resistance is low. Levofloxacin based triple therapy is an effective alternative to quadruple therapy in second-line treatment. Adjuvant therapy may reduce side-effects and improve compliance. Molecular and genomic research on H. pylori may result in the development of targeted antibiotic therapy; however, more research is required in this field. Further research in vaccination is also necessary before this can become an option in clinical practice.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection 2012

Helicobacter pylori resistance rates to antibiotics vary in different countries and even in different regions of the same country. Choice of treatment is strongly dependent on antibiotic resistance rates. In some countries, triple therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is still the best option, but eradication results fall short of what would be desired (90-95%) in countries with clarithromycin resistance >20%, bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, or nonbismuth sequential or concomitant therapies may then be the preferred option. Newer antibiotic regimens are awaited. Vaccination would be the best option, especially for developing countries, but little progress has been made in designing a vaccine.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection 2011

This article reviews the literature published pertaining to Helicobacter pylori eradication over the last year. The general perception among clinicians and academics engaged in research on H. pylori has been that eradication rates for first-line therapies are falling, although some data published this year have cast doubt on this. The studies published this year have therefore focussed on developing alternative strategies for the first-line eradication of H. pylori. In this regard, clear evidence now exists that both levofloxacin and bismuth are viable options for first-line therapy. The sequential and "concomitant" regimes have also been studied in new settings and may have a role in future algorithms also. In addition, data have emerged that the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii may be a useful adjunct to antibiotic therapy. Other studies promote individualized therapies based on host polymorphisms, age, and other such demographic factors.     

Review: Clinical Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection in China

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has been associated with gastric disorders. The situation of H. pylori infection in China—where a high prevalence of H. pylori infection, a high incidence of gastric cancer, and widespread resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin exist—is quite different from that in Western countries. In order for Chinese clinicians to better manage H. pylori infection, a Chinese Study Group on H. pylori published four consensus reports regarding the management of H. pylori infection in China between 1999 and 2012. The eradication rate with standard triple therapy was <80% in most areas of China. Bismuth is available in China, and bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy has been shown to produce a high eradication rate; thus, bismuth quadruple therapy could be recommended both as an initial and as a rescue therapy in China. There is no advantage of sequential therapy over triple therapy in Chinese patients, but the efficacy of concomitant therapy must be studied further. This review introduces the epidemiology, diagnosis, indicators, and therapies for the eradication of H. pylori in China in recent years.     

Review: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection 2019

This review summarizes important studies regarding Helicobacter pylori therapy published from May 2018 to May 2019. The main themes that emerge involve studies assessing the efficacy of bismuth‐based regimens. While in recent years the efficacy of bismuth‐based quadruple therapy as a second‐line therapy has been clearly established, there is now substantial evidence that it is the best performing first‐line therapy. Antibiotic resistance was again intensely studied this year, and a clear and dramatic increase in resistance is noted for clarithromycin and levofloxacin; most notably, it may not be possible to support these therapies in most regions of the world much longer without testing. The utility of vonoprazan as an alternative to proton‐pump inhibitor therapy, especially in resistant and difficult to treat groups, has also been considered in greater detail this year, as well as means of supporting and enhancing adherence to therapy. Several studies showed that the diversity of gut microbiota was significantly altered shortly after H pylori eradication. However, the diversity was restored to pre‐treatment state after 2 months in patients treated with triple therapy. More studies are warranted to assess the long‐term changes of gut microbiota after H pylori eradication.     

Recent use of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies for the eradication of H pylori: a broad data review

Introduction. For the eradication of Helicobacter pylori a 1‐week triple therapy combining proton pump inhibitors with two antibiotics has been recommended as a gold standard therapy. However, a recent broad data review on the efficacy of the different regimens is missing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review the recent literature. Methods. We undertook a broad data review of the efficacy of nine different 7‐day triple therapies consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (lansoprazole, pantoprazole, omeprazole) in its standard dosage and two antibiotics. Relevant original papers on H. pylori eradication in adults, published in English or German between 1995 and 2000, were identified from MEDLINE searches. Studies were reviewed and selected according to predefined criteria. Results. Our predefined criteria were fulfilled by 79 full paper articles including 112 study arms with 8383 patients on intention‐to‐treat, or 6787 patients on per‐protocol basis, respectively. The mean eradication rates unweighted or weighted by the number of patients in the study arm vary from 71.9% to 83.8% for intention‐to‐treat analysis and from 78.5% to 91.2% for per‐protocol analysis. Conclusions. All nine PPI based triple therapy regimens are very effective in H. pylori eradication. The current literature review underlines that the use of either lansoprazole, omeprazole, or pantoprazole combined with two antibiotics yield similar high eradication rates.     

Double-blind comparison of absorbable colloidal bismuth subcitrate and nonabsorbable bismuth subnitrate in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and the relief of nonulcer dyspepsia

Background. Bismuth is widely used for the eradication of H. pylori , especially in developing countries, although there are concerns over its neurotoxicity. Whether bismuth has to be absorbed in humans to act against H. pylori is not known. In this study, we compared "absorbable" (colloidal bismuth subcitrate) and "nonabsorbable" (bismuth subnitrate) bismuth as part of triple therapy in the eradication of H. pylori.
Materials and Methods. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was carried out with 120 H. pylori –positive patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. Group CBS + Ab (n = 35) received colloidal bismuth subcitrate (one tablet qds), amoxicillin (500 mg qds), and metronidazole (400 mg tds). Group BSN + Ab (n = 35) received bismuth subnitrate (two tablets tds) and the same antibiotics. Group Ab (n = 35) received placebo bismuth (two tablets tds) and the antibiotics. Group BSN (n = 15) received bismuth subnitrate (two tablets tds) and placebo antibiotics. Bismuth was taken for 4 weeks and the antibiotics for the first 2 weeks. H. pylori eradication, side effects, compliance, pre- and post-treatment symptom scores, and bismuth absorption were assessed.
Results. H. pylori eradication was 69%, 83%, 31%, and 0% in CBS + Ab, BSN + Ab, Ab, and BSN, respectively. Side effects, compliance, and symptom relief were similar in all groups, but blood bismuth levels were significantly greater in CBS + Ab than the other three groups.
Conclusion. The efficacy of bismuth-based therapies as part of triple therapy in the eradication of H. pylori is unrelated to absorption. Hence, the use of effective but poorly absorbed bismuth preparations should be encouraged for bismuth-based eradication therapies.     

Moxifloxacin-Containing Triple Therapy as Second-Line Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection: Effect of Treatment Duration and Antibiotic Resistance on the Eradication Rate

Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a moxifloxacin‐containing triple therapy as second‐line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. We also investigated the effect of treatment duration and antibiotic resistance on the eradication rate of this therapy. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients found to have persistent H. pylori infections after failure of first‐line proton‐pump inhibitor‐based triple therapy. Patients took moxifloxacin (400 mg q.d.), amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.), and esomeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.). The eradication rate, drug compliance, and adverse event rates were evaluated. Minimal inhibitory tests were performed for moxifloxacin and amoxicillin by the agar dilution method. Results: In 2004, 41 patients were treated for 7 days. The intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol eradication rates (ITT/PP) were 75.6/83.8%. Moxifloxacin resistance was 5.6%. Therapy was extended to 10 days during 2005–2006 and 139 patients were treated. The ITT/PP eradication rates were 71.9/82.6%; moxifloxacin resistance had increased to 12%. The final group of 181 patients in 2007–2008 who were treated for 14 days also had low eradication rates (68/79.9%), but there was no statistical significance in the efficacy among the treatment periods. Moxifloxacin resistance in 2007–2008 was 28.2%. Side‐effect increased with treatment duration (i.e., 9.8, 12.2, and 25.4% at 7, 10, and 14 days, respectively, p = .001). Conclusion: The 7‐day moxifloxacin‐containing triple therapy produced an unacceptably low eradication rate. Increasing the duration of therapy was expected to increase the eradication rate, but the expected increased did not materialize, most likely because of coincident marked increase in the prevalence of resistance to moxifloxacin. Tailored treatment based on antibiotic susceptibility testing might be more effective in the achievement of high eradication rate when rapid antibiotic resistance such as moxifloxacin is occurring.     

微生态制剂联合标准三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌感染Meta分析

目的系统评价微生态制剂联合标准三联疗法能否提高H.pylori根除率,减少根除过程中的不良反应。方法从常用电子数据库检索标准三联疗法联合与未联合微生态制剂根除H.pylori的随机对照临床试验,Meta分析各项研究的根除率和不良反应发生率的合并OR值,以漏斗图检测发表偏倚。结果共15项随机临床试验符合纳入标准。三联疗法联合与未联合微生态制剂,根除率分别为79.7%（95%CI：77.1%～82.3%）和69.5%（95%CI：66.5%～72.5%）,合并OR值为1.75（95%CI：1.40～2.18）,总不良反应发生率分别为27.7%（95%CI：24.5%～30.9%）和53.0%（95%CI：49.4%～56.6%）,合并OR值为0.35（95%CI：0.21～0.60）。结论微生态制剂联合标准三联疗法可显著提高H.pylori根除率,降低根除过程中的不良反应发生率。     

Randomized comparison of two non-bismuth-containing second-line rescue therapies for Helicobacter pylori

Background: Classical second‐line anti‐Helicobacter pylori includes proton‐pump inhibitor, tetracycline, metronidazole, and bismuth salts, but alternative therapies are required owing to the restricted availability of the latter. Levofloxacin‐containing triple therapy is recommended but is expensive. Besides, quinolone resistance in an endemic tuberculosis infection area like Taiwan is concerned. The low in vitro antibiotic resistance to amoxicillin and tetracycline in Taiwanese H. pylori strains implies that in vivo esomeprazole/amoxicillin/tetracycline (EAT) second‐line rescue therapy may be effective. This study compared the efficacy of esomeprazole/amoxicillin/levofloxacin (EAL) and EAT second‐line eradication therapies and determines the clinical factors influencing the efficacy of salvage regimens. Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty‐eight patients who failed H. pylori eradication using the standard triple therapy for 7 days are randomly assigned to either EAL group (esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, and levofloxacin 500 mg once daily) for 7 days or EAT group (esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg four times daily) for 14 days. Follow‐up endoscopy or urea breath test was performed 8 weeks later to assess treatment response. Results: The eradication rates of EAL and EAT groups were 78.1 versus 75.0%, p = .676 (in intention‐to‐treat analysis) and 80.3 versus 80%, p = .0964 (per‐protocol analysis). Both groups exhibited similar drug compliance (95.3 vs 96.9%, p = .952) but more adverse events in the EAT group (6.3 vs 12.5%, p = .225). Conclusions: Despite low in vitro drug resistances to amoxicillin and tetracycline, the efficacy of 14‐day EAT regimens attained an unacceptable report card of 75% eradication rates in intention‐to‐treat analysis and was not even superior to the 7‐day EAL regimen. Drug–drug interaction between combined antibiotics should be considered other than in vivo drug resistances.     

Quadruple therapy with medications containing either rufloxacin or furazolidone as a rescue regimen in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-infected dyspepsia patients: a randomized pilot study

Background: The eradication rates of first‐line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection are not satisfactory. Various regimens including quadruple therapies have been recommended as rescue therapies after the first H. pylori eradication attempt failed. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety between quadruple therapies with medications containing either rufloxacin or levofloxacin in the Chinese nonulcer dyspepsia patients infected with H. pylori. Methods: One hundred and thirty‐eight patients after an unsuccessful 10‐day standard triple therapy were enrolled in this study. They were randomized to receive a 14‐day quadruple therapy with pantoprazole, bismuth citrate, and furazolidone in combination with either rufloxacin (Group Ruf, n = 70) or levofloxacin (Group Lev, n = 68). The H. pylori eradication was evaluated by ¹³C‐urea breath test 4 and 12 weeks after therapy was completed. Results: One hundred and twenty‐seven patients (65 in Group Ruf and 62 in Group Lev) completed the study. The H. pylori eradication rates in Group Ruf were 81.4% for intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis and 87.7% for per‐protocol (PP) analysis. The rates were statistically significantly higher than those in Group Lev (66.2% and 72.6%) (p < 0.05). There were no severe adverse effects found in these two groups. Conclusions: Fourteen‐day quadruple therapy with a combination of proton‐pump inhibitor, bismuth citrate, furazolidone, and rufloxacin is considered an effective and safe rescue therapy for H. pylori eradication after failure of standard triple treatment.     

中西药联合在根除幽门螺杆菌治疗中的作用

幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,H.pylori)感染是很多消化系统疾病的主要病因之一,因此根除H.pylori就显得至关重要。从1999年至今,我国共颁布了5次H.pylori感染共识,根除H.pylori方案经过不断改进,从最初的PPI/RBC+2种抗生素的标准三联方案到目前第五次H.pylori感染共识推出的含铋剂四联方案,我国学者在根除H.pylori方面做了很大的努力。但目前的含铋剂四联方案仍有不足之处,抗生素的耐药问题严重影响了H.pylori的根除率,加之再感染率有上升趋势,故H.pylori的根除治疗还面临着许多困惑。所以人们开始将目光集中到了联合中药治疗上面。已有研究证实,某些中药不仅在体外有抑菌作用,而且与PPI、抗生素联合应用能明显提高H.pylori的根除率,减少药物不良反应,并减少抗生素耐药的发生。本文将近年来中西药联合根除H.pylori的相关文献作一综述,为临床用药提供参考。     

Efficacy of moxifloxacin-based triple therapy as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Metronidazole and tetracycline-based second-line quadruple therapy, widely used for Helicobacter pylori infection, often ends up in failure due to antibiotic resistance and poor compliance in Korea. Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin-based triple therapy as an alternative second-line treatment for H. pylori infection. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 85 patients infected with H. pylori, in whom initial proton pump inhibitor triple therapy had failed. They were randomized to receive the following 7-day therapy: 1, moxifloxacin 400 mg q.d., esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d.; and 2, esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d., tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate 300 mg q.i.d., metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d., and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. Eradication rates, drug compliance, and side-effect rates of each group were evaluated. RESULTS: The eradication rates were 75.6 and 83.8% with moxifloxacin triple therapy, and 54.5 and 72.7% with quadruple therapy by intention-to-treat (p = .042) and per-protocol analyses (p = .260), respectively. Moxifloxacin triple therapy was significantly superior to quadruple therapy in terms of side-effect rates (p = .039). Compliance for therapy, i.e., the percentage of tablets taken (> 85%), was 90.2 and 75.0%, numerically higher in moxifloxacin triple therapy group than in quadruple therapy group, but without statistical difference (p = .065). CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin-based triple therapy showed high eradication rates with few side effects and good drug compliance, suggesting this regimen could be a safe and effective option as second-line therapy for H. pylori infection in Korea.     

Variables Influencing Outcome of Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy in South China

Background: Therapy combining a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or metronidazole is widely recommended for first‐line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of PPI‐containing triple therapy and identify factors influencing the cure rate of H. pylori infection in South China. Materials and Methods: H. pylori positive patients with different occupations from 25 hospitals in five provinces of South China were enrolled. They received a PPI, metronidazole and amoxicillin triple therapy for a week. H. pylori eradication was evaluated by ¹³C‐urea breath test 4 weeks after therapy. Association between H. pylori eradication with occupation, gender, age, educational level, and protocol compliance was evaluated by Logistic regression. Results: Six hundred and seventy‐five were enrolled. The intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses showed overall cure rates of 60% (95% CI = 56.3–63.7%) and 64.5% (95% CI = 60.7–68.3%), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression showed that occupation, gender and protocol compliance were positively associated with the eradication rate (p < .01). The cure rate for those who took 80% or more of the prescribed drugs was 64.5% (95% CI = 60.7–68.3%) versus 14.6% (95% CI = 6–29%, p < .001) for those who took less. Lower eradication rates were also observed in farmers and women. Conclusions: The eradication rate with a PPI, metronidazole and amoxicillin triple therapy was unacceptably low in South China. These results suggest that studies of the eradication of H. pylori infection in China must take into account antibiotic resistance as well as patient occupation, gender, and protocol compliance. Gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease are both important in China making methods to effectively and efficiently eradicate H. pylori a priority.     

Meta-analysis: Four-Drug, Three-Antibiotic, Non-bismuth-Containing "Concomitant Therapy" Versus Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Background: Low success rates with triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections have prompted search for alternatives. In one, a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin was followed by the PPI plus clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole (sequential therapy); in another, these four drugs were given concomitantly (concomitant therapy).
Aim: To compare concomitant therapy with standard triple therapy for H. pylori infection.
Methods: By searching PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and abstracts of major gastrointestinal meeting, two independent reviewers systemically identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing concomitant quadruple to standard triple therapies as well as studies reporting eradication rates of concomitant quadruple therapy in treatment of H. pylori . Pooled eradication rates and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and univariable metaregression analysis for all extracted variables was conducted.
Results: We identified nine studies (10 treatment arms) including five qualifying RCTs (576 subjects) comparing concomitant (293 subjects, duration 3 to 5 days) and triple therapy (283 subjects, duration 5 to 10 days) and four other studies evaluating concomitant therapy (478 subjects, duration 3 to 7 days). Pooled estimates of the five RCTs showed superiority of concomitant therapy over triple therapy; with intention-to-treat) pooled OR of 2.86 (95% CI: 1.73–4.73) and per-protocol (PP) pooled OR of 3.52 (95% CI: 1.95–6.38). Considering all 10 treatment arms, the ITT eradication rate was 89.7% (95% CI: 86.8–92.1%) and PP was 92.9% (95% CI: 90.2–94.8%).
Conclusion: Concomitant therapy appears to be an effective alternative to triple therapy and is less complex than sequential therapy.