The alpha 3 subunit gene of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is a candidate gene for ethanol stimulation

Alcohol and nicotine are coabused, and preclinical and clinical data suggest that common genes may influence responses to both drugs. A gene in a region of mouse chromosome 9 that includes a cluster of three nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunit genes influences the locomotor stimulant response to ethanol. The current studies first used congenic mice to confirm the influential gene on chromosome 9. Congenic F₂ mice were then used to more finely map the location. Gene expression of the three subunit genes was quantified in strains of mice that differ in response to ethanol. Finally, the locomotor response to ethanol was examined in mice heterozygous for a null mutation of the α3 nAChR subunit gene ( Chrna3 ). Congenic data indicate that a gene on chromosome 9, within a 46 cM region that contains the cluster of nAChR subunit genes, accounts for 41% of the genetic variation in the stimulant response to ethanol. Greater expression of Chrna3 was found in whole brain and dissected brain regions relevant to locomotor behavior in mice that were less sensitive to ethanol-induced stimulation compared to mice that were robustly stimulated; the other two nAChR subunit genes in the gene cluster (α5 and β4) were not differentially expressed. Locomotor stimulation was not expressed on the genetic background of Chrna3 heterozygous (+/−) and wild-type (+/+) mice; +/− mice were more sensitive than +/+ mice to the locomotor depressant effects of ethanol. Chrna3 is a candidate gene for the acute locomotor stimulant response to ethanol that deserves further examination.     

Identification of two Lynx proteins in Nilaparvata lugens and the modulation on insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) mediate fast cholinergic synaptic transmission in the insect brain and are targets for neonicotinoid insecticides. Some proteins, other than nAChRs themselves, might play important roles in insect nAChRs function in vivo and in vitro , such as the chaperone, regulator and modulator. Here we report the identification of two nAChR modulators (Nl-lynx1 and Nl-lynx2) in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens . Analysis of amino acid sequences of Nl-lynx1 and Nl-lynx2 reveals that they are two members of the Ly-6/neurotoxin superfamily, with a cysteine-rich consensus signature motif. Nl-lynx1 and Nl-lynx2 only increased agonist-evoked macroscopic currents of hybrid receptors Nlα1/β2 expressed in Xenopus oocytes, but not change the agonist sensitivity and desensitization properties. For example, Nl-lynx1 increased I _max of acetylcholine and imidacloprid to 3.56-fold and 1.72-fold of that of Nlα1/β2 alone, and these folds for Nl-lynx2 were 3.25 and 1.51. When the previously identified Nlα1^Y151S mutation was included (Nlα1^Y151S/β2), the effects of Nl-lynx1 and Nl-lynx2 on imidacloprid responses, but not acetylcholine response, were different from that in Nlα1/β2. The increased folds in imidacloprid responses by Nl-lynx1 and Nl-lynx2 were much higher in Nlα1^Y151S/β2 (3.25-fold and 2.86-fold) than in Nlα1/β2 (1.72-fold and 1.51-fold), which indicated Nl-lynx1 and Nl-lynx2 might also serve as an influencing factor in target-site insensitivity in N. lugens . These findings indicate that nAChRs chaperone, regulator and modulator may be of importance in assessing the likely impact of the target-site mutations such as Y151S upon neonicotinoid insecticide resistance.     

神经元烟碱受体在全身麻醉机制中的作用

作为配体－门控离子通道超家族成员的神经元烟碱受体分布于中枢和外周神经系统,包括多种亚型,具有广泛的生理作用,可以成为多种疾病的药物治疗靶点。它在全身麻醉原理中的作用也被日益重视。部分全身麻醉药物（挥发性吸入、气体吸入麻醉药、硫喷妥钠、氯胺酮等）在低于临床麻醉剂量时能够明显抑制该受体功能,神经元烟碱受体可能参与了这些药物的临床作用机制。     

Determination of alpha-conotoxin binding modes on neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

alpha-Conotoxins, from cone snails, and alpha-neurotoxins, from snakes, are competitive inhibitors of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) that have overlapping binding sites in the ACh binding pocket. These disulphide-rich peptides are used extensively as tools to localize and pharmacologically characterize specific nAChRs subtypes. Recently, a homology model based on the high-resolution structure of an ACh binding protein (AChBP) allowed the three-fingered alpha-neurotoxins to be docked onto the alpha7 nAChR. To investigate if alpha-conotoxins interact with the nAChR in a similar manner, we built homology models of human alpha7 and alpha3beta2 nAChRs, and performed docking simulations of alpha-conotoxins ImI, PnIB, PnIA and MII using the program GOLD. Docking revealed that alpha-conotoxins have a different mode of interaction compared with alpha-neurotoxins, with surprisingly few nAChR residues in common between their overlapping binding sites. These docking experiments show that ImI and PnIB bind to the ACh binding pocket via a small cavity located above the beta9/beta10 hairpin of the (+)alpha7 nAChR subunit. Interestingly, PnIB, PnIA and MII were found to bind in a similar location on alpha7 or alpha3beta2 receptors mostly through hydrophobic interactions, while ImI bound further from the ACh binding pocket, mostly through electrostatic interactions. These findings, which distinguish alpha-conotoxin and alpha-neurotoxin binding modes, have implications for the rational design of selective nAChR antagonists.     

Multiple inhibitory actions of lidocaine on Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptors transplanted to Xenopus oocytes

Lidocaine is a local anaesthetic that blocks sodium channels, but also inhibits several ligand-gated ion-channels. The aim of this work was to unravel the mechanisms by which lidocaine blocks Torpedo nicotinic receptors transplanted to Xenopus oocytes. Acetylcholine-elicited currents were reversibly blocked by lidocaine, in a concentration dependent manner. At doses lower than the IC(50) , lidocaine blocked nicotinic receptors only at negative potentials, indicating an open-channel blockade; the binding site within the channel was at about 30% of the way through the electrical field across the membrane. In the presence of higher lidocaine doses, nicotinic receptors were blocked both at positive and negative potentials, acetylcholine dose-response curve shifted to the right and lidocaine pre-application, before its co-application with acetylcholine, enhanced the current inhibition, indicating all together that lidocaine also blocked resting receptors; besides, it increased the current decay rate. When lidocaine, at low doses, was co-applied with 2-(triethylammonio)-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl) acetamide bromide, edrophonium or 1,5-bis(4-allyldimethylammoniumphenyl)pentan-3-one dibromide, which are quaternary-ammonium molecules that also blocked nicotinic receptors, there was an additive inhibitory effect, indicating that these molecules bound to different sites within the channel pore. These results prove that lidocaine blocks nicotinic receptors by several independent mechanisms and evidence the diverse and complex modulation of this receptor by structurally related molecules.     

Spreading depression-induced preconditioning in the mouse cortex: differential changes in the protein expression of ionotropic nicotinic acetylcholine and glutamate receptors

Preconditioning of the cerebral cortex was induced in mice by repeated cortical spreading depression (CSD), and the major ionotropic glutamate (GluRs) and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChRs) subunits were compared by quantitative immunoblotting between sham- and preconditioned cortex, 24 h after treatment. A 30% reduction in alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-iso- xazolepropionate (AMPA) GluR1 and 2 subunit immunoreactivities was observed in the preconditioned cortex (p < 0.03), but there was no significant change in the NMDA receptor subunits, NR1, NR2A and NR2B. A 12-15-fold increase in alpha7 nAChR subunit expression following in vivo CSD (p < 0.001) was by far the most remarkable change associated with preconditioning. In contrast, the alpha4 nAChR subunit was not altered. These data point to the alpha7 nAChR as a potential new target for neuroprotection because preconditioning increases consistently the tolerance of the brain to acute insults such as ischaemia. These data complement recent studies implicating alpha7 nAChR overexpression in the amelioration of chronic neuropathologies, notably Alzheimer's disease (AD).     

Natural α-conotoxins and their synthetic analogues in study of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

α-Conotoxins, peptide neurotoxins from poisonous marine snails of the genus Conus that highly specifically block nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) of various types, are reviewed. Preliminarily, the structural organization of AChRs of the muscular and neuronal types, their involvement in physiological processes, and their role in various diseases are briefly discussed. In this connection, the necessity of quantitative determination of AChR subtypes using neurotoxins and other approaches is substantiated. The chemical structure, spatial organization, and specificity of α-conotoxins are mainly discussed, taking into consideration the recent results on the ability of α-conotoxins to interact with muscular or neuronal hetero-and homooligomeric AChRs exhibiting a high species specificity. Particular emphasis is placed upon a thorough characterization of the surfaces of interaction of α-conotoxins with AChRs using synthetic analogues of α-conotoxins, mutations in AChRs, and pairwise mutations in both α-conotoxins and AChRs. The discovery in 2001 of the acetylcholine-binding protein from the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis and the determination of its crystalline structure led to rapid progress in understanding the structural organization of ligand-binding domains of AChRs with which α-conotoxins also interact. We discuss the interaction of various α-conotoxins with acetylcholine-binding proteins, the recently reported X-ray structure of the complex of the acetylcholine-binding protein from Aplysia californica with the α-conotoxin analogue PnIA, and the application of this structure to the modeling of complexes of α-conotoxins with various AChRs.     

Selective actions of Lynx proteins on different nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the locust,Locusta migratoria manilensis

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are major neurotransmitter receptors and targets of neonicotinoid insecticides in the insect nervous system. The full function of nAChRs is often dependent on associated proteins, such as chaperones, regulators and modulators. Here, three Lynx (Ly‐6/neurotoxin) proteins, Loc‐lynx1, Loc‐lynx2 and Loc‐lynx3, were identified in the locust, Locusta migratoria manilensis. Co‐expression with Lynx resulted in a dramatic increase in agonist‐evoked macroscopic currents on nAChRs Locα1/β2 and Locα2/β2 in Xenopus oocytes, but no changes in agonist sensitivity. Loc‐lynx1 and Loc‐lynx3 only modulated nAChRs Locα1/β2 while Loc‐lynx2 modulated Locα2/β2 specifically. Meanwhile, Loc‐lynx1 induced a more significant increase in currents evoked by imidacloprid and epibatidine than Loc‐lynx3, and the effects of Loc‐lynx1 on imidacloprid and epibatidine were significantly higher than those on acetylcholine. Among three lynx proteins, only Loc‐lynx1 significantly increased [³H]epibatidine binding on Locα1/β2. The results indicated that Loc‐lynx1 had different modulation patterns in nAChRs compared to Loc‐lynx2 and Loc‐lynx3. Taken together, these findings indicated that three Lynx proteins were nAChR modulators and had selective activities in different nAChRs. Lynx proteins might display their selectivities from three aspects: nAChR subtypes, various agonists and different modulation patterns.

     

Hippocampal knockdown of α2 nicotinic or M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in C57BL/6J male mice impairs cued fear conditioning

Acetylcholine (ACh) signaling in the hippocampus is important for behaviors related to learning, memory and stress. In this study, we investigated the role of two ACh receptor subtypes previously shown to be involved in fear and anxiety, the M1 mAChR and the α2 nAChR, in mediating the effects of hippocampal ACh on stress‐related behaviors. Adeno‐associated viral vectors containing short‐hairpin RNAs targeting M1 or α2 were infused into the hippocampus of male C57BL/6J mice, and behavior in a number of paradigms related to stress responses and fear learning was evaluated. There were no robust effects of hippocampal M1 mAChR or α2 nAChR knockdown (KD) in the light/dark box, tail suspension, forced swim or novelty‐suppressed feeding tests. However, effects on fear learning were observed in both KD groups. Short term learning was intact immediately after training in all groups of mice, but both the M1 and α2 hippocampal knock down resulted in impaired cued fear conditioning 24 h after training. In addition, there was a trend for a deficit in contextual memory the M1 mAChR KD group 24 h after training. These results suggest that α2 nicotinic and M1 muscarinic ACh receptors in the hippocampus contribute to fear learning and could be relevant targets to modify brain circuits involved in stress‐induced reactivity to associated cues.     

Chaperone protein 14-3-3 and protein kinase A increase the relative abundance of low agonist sensitivity human alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in Xenopus oocytes

Alpha4 and beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptor subunits expressed heterologously in Xenopus oocytes assemble into a mixture of receptors with high and low agonist sensitivity whose relative abundance is influenced by the heteropentamer subunit ratio. We have found that inhibition of protein kinase A by KT5720 decreased maximal [3H]cytisine binding and acetylcholine (ACh)-induced current responses, and increased the relative proportion of alpha4beta2 receptors with high agonist sensitivity. Mutation of serine 467, a putative protein kinase A substrate in a chaperone protein binding motif within the large cytoplasmic domain of the alpha4 subunit, to alanine or asparate decreased or increased, respectively, maximal [3H]cytisine binding and ACh response amplitude. Expression of alpha4S467A mutant subunits decreased steady levels of alpha4 and the relative proportion of alpha4beta2 receptors with low agonist sensitivity, whilst expression of alpha4S467D increased steady levels of alpha4 and alpha4beta2 receptors with low agonist sensitivity. Difopein, an inhibitor of chaperone 14-3-3 proteins, decreased [3H]cytisine binding and ACh responses and increased the proportion of alpha4beta2 with high sensitivity to activation by ACh. Thus, post-translational modification affecting steady-state levels of alpha4 subunits provides a possible means for physiologically relevant, chaperone-mediated variation in the relative proportion of high and low agonist sensitivity alpha4beta2 nACh receptors.     

Inhibition by 2,4-toluene diisocyanate of the calcium signaling of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells

Summary Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) is widely used as a chemical intermediate in the production of polyurethane products such as foams, coatings, and elastomers. In exposed workers, chronic inhalation of TDI has resulted in significant decreases in lung function. TDI-induced asthma is related to its disturbance of acetylcholine in most affected workers but the actions of TDI on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) are unclear. In order to understand the role of TDI acting on nAChR, we used human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells to investigate the effects of TDI on cytosolic free calcium concentration ([Ca ) changes under the stimulation of nAChR. The results showed that TDI was capable of inhibiting the [Ca rise induced by nicotinic ligands, epibatidine, DMPP and nicotine. The inhibition was remained, even increased after chronic treatment of TDI. Our study of TDI acting on human nAChR suggests a possibility that the human nerve system plays some role in the toxicity of TDI in the pulmonary system.     

Presence of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on dorsal root ganglion neurons proved using knockout mice and selective α-neurotoxins in histochemistry

In complex tissues where multiple subtypes of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are expressed, immunohistochemistry has been the most popular tool for investigation of nAChR subunit distribution. However, recent studies with nAChR subunit knockout mice demonstrated that a large panel of antibodies is unsuitable. Thus, we aimed to develop a histochemical method for selective labeling of α7 nAChR with neurotoxins, utilizing α7 nAChR-transfected cells, dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and spinal cord from wild-type and knockout mouse. The specificity of Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated α-bungarotoxin (Alexa-αBgt) was demonstrated in binding to α7-transfected cells inhibited by long-chain α-cobratoxin (CTX), but not short-chain α-neurotoxin II (NTII). In contrast, binding to Torpedo muscle-type nAChRs and to motor end plates in mouse tongue sections was prevented by both CTX and NTII. In tissue sections of DRG, expressing all neuronal nAChR subunits, only CTX precluded Alexa-αBgt labeling of neurons, with no staining for α7 nAChR knockout tissue. It proved that α7 nAChRs are the major αBgt-binding sites in mouse DRG. Corresponding results were obtained for terminals in the spinal cord. Thus, we present a protocol utilizing Alexa-αBgt and non-labeled CTX/NTII that allows specific histochemical detection of α7 nAChR with a spatial resolution at the level of single axon terminals.     

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors containing α6 subunits contribute to alcohol reward‐related behaviours

Evidence is emerging that neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system are involved in mediating the reinforcing effects of alcohol. Midbrain DA neurons express high levels of α6 subunit‐containing nAChRs that modulate DA transmission, implicating their involvement in reward‐related behaviours. This study assessed the role of α6‐containing nAChRs in modulating alcohol reward using transgenic mice expressing mutant, hypersensitive α6 nAChR subunits (α6L9′S mice). α6L9′S mice and littermate controls were tested in three well‐established models of alcohol reward: 24‐h two‐bottle choice drinking, drinking in the dark (DID), and conditioned place preference (CPP). Confocal microscopy and patch‐clamp electrophysiology were used to show the localization and function of hypersensitive α6 subunit‐containing nAChRs. Results indicate that female α6L9′S mice showed significantly higher alcohol intake at low concentrations of alcohol (3% and 6%) in the two‐bottle choice procedure. Both male and female α6L9′S mice drank significantly more in the DID procedure and displayed an alcohol‐induced place preference using a low dose of alcohol (0.5 g/kg) that was ineffective in littermate controls. Confocal microscopy showed that α6 subunit‐containing nAChRs are selectively expressed on ventral tegmental area (VTA) DAergic, but not GABAergic neurons. Patch‐clamp electrophysiology showed that VTA DA neurons of α6L9′S mice are hypersensitive to ACh. Collectively, these results suggest that α6L9′S mice are more sensitive to the rewarding effects of alcohol, and suggest that VTA α6 subunit‐containing nAChRs modulate alcohol reward. Thus, α6 subunit‐containing nAChRs may be a promising therapeutic target for treatment of alcohol use disorders .     

Differential physiologic responses of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors to β‐amyloid1–40 and β‐amyloid1–42

The β‐amyloid peptides (Aβ), Aβ_1–40 and Aβ_1–42, have been implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. Although Aβ_1–42 is generally considered to be the pathological peptide in AD, both Aβ_1–40 and Aβ_1–42 have been used in a variety of experimental models without discrimination. Here we show that monomeric or oligomeric forms of the two Aβ peptides, when interact with the neuronal cation channel, α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α7nAChR), would result in distinct physiologic responses as measured by acetylcholine release and calcium influx experiments. While Aβ_1–42 effectively attenuated these α7nAChR‐dependent physiology to an extent that was apparently irreversible, Aβ_1–40 showed a lower inhibitory activity that could be restored upon washings with physiologic buffers or treatment with α7nAChR antagonists. Our data suggest a clear pharmacological distinction between Aβ_1–40 and Aβ_1–42. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 55: 25–30, 2003