Cell surface fibroblast growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptors are permanently lost during skeletal muscle terminal differentiation in culture

One characteristic of skeletal muscle differentiation is the conversion of proliferating cells to a population that is irreversibly postmitotic. This developmental change can be induced in vitro by depriving the cultures of specific mitogens such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF). Analysis of cell surface FGF receptor (FGFR) in several adult mouse muscle cell lines and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in mouse MM14 cells reveals a correlation between receptor loss and the acquisition of a postmitotic phenotype. Quiescent MM14 cells, mitogen-depleted, differentiation-defective MM14 cells, and differentiated BC3H1 muscle cells (a line that fails to become postmitotic upon differentiation) retained their cell surface FGFR. These results indicate that FGFR loss is not associated with either reversible cessation of muscle cell proliferation or biochemical differentiation and thus, further support a correlation between receptor loss and acquisition of a postmitotic phenotype. Comparison of the kinetics for growth factor receptor loss and for commitment of MM14 cells to a postmitotic phenotype reveals that FGFR rises transiently from approximately 700 receptors/cell to a maximum of approximately 2,000 receptors/cell 12 h after FGF removal, when at the same time, greater than 95% of the cells are postmitotic. FGFR levels then decline to undetectable levels by 24 h after FGF removal. During the interval in which FGFR increases and then disappears there is no change in its affinity for FGF. The transient increase in growth factor receptors appears to be due to a decrease in ligand-mediated internalization because EGFR, which undergoes an immediate decline when cultures are deprived of FGF (Lim, R. W., and S. D. Hauschka. 1984. J. Cell Biol. 98:739-747), exhibits a similar transient rise when cultures are grown in media containing both EGF and FGF before switching the cells to media without these added factors. These results indicate that the loss of certain growth factor receptors is a specific phenotype acquired during skeletal muscle differentiation, but they do not resolve whether regulation of FGFR number is causal for initiation of the postmitotic phenotype. A general model is presented in the discussion.     

Differentially expressed fibroblast growth factors regulate skeletal muscle development through autocrine and paracrine mechanisms

Several FGF family members are expressed in skeletal muscle; however, the roles of these factors in skeletal muscle development are unclear. We examined the RNA expression, protein levels, and biological activities of the FGF family in the MM14 mouse skeletal muscle cell line. Proliferating skeletal muscle cells express FGF-1, FGF-2, FGF-6, and FGF-7 mRNA. Differentiated myofibers express FGF-5, FGF-7, and reduced levels of FGF-6 mRNA. FGF-3, FGF-4, and FGF-8 were not detectable by RT-PCR in either proliferating or differentiated skeletal muscle cells. FGF-I and FGF-2 proteins were present in proliferating skeletal muscle cells, but undetectable after terminal differentiation. We show that transfection of expression constructs encoding FGF-1 or FGF-2 mimics the effects of exogenously applied FGFs, inhibiting skeletal muscle cell differentiation and stimulating DNA synthesis. These effects require activation of an FGF tyrosine kinase receptor as they are blocked by transfection of a dominant negative mutant FGF receptor. Transient transfection of cells with FGF-1 or FGF-2 expression constructs exerted a global effect on myoblast DNA synthesis, as greater than 50% of the nontransfected cells responded by initiating DNA synthesis. The global effect of cultures transfected with FGF-2 expression vectors was blocked by an anti-FGF-2 monoclonal antibody, suggesting that FGF-2 was exported from the transfected cells. Despite the fact that both FGF-l and FGF-2 lack secretory signal sequences, when expressed intracellularly, they regulate skeletal muscle development. Thus, production of FGF-1 and FGF-2 by skeletal muscle cells may act as a paracrine and autocrine regulator of skeletal muscle development in vivo.     

The human fibroblast growth factor receptor genes: a common structural arrangement underlies the mechanisms for generating receptor forms that differ in their third immunoglobulin domain.

To determine the mechanisms by which multiple forms of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors are generated, we have mapped the arrangement of exons and introns in the human FGF receptor 1 (FGFR 1) gene (flg). We found three alternative exons encoding a portion of the third immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domain of the receptor. One of these alternatives encodes a sequence that is part of a secreted form of FGFR 1. The other two encode sequences that are likely part of transmembrane forms of FGFR 1. One of these forms has not been previously reported in published cDNAs. Also, we have determined the structural organization of a portion of the human FGFR 2 gene (bek) and found a similar arrangement of alternative exons for the third Ig-like domain. The arrangement of these genes suggests that there are conserved mechanisms governing the expression of secreted FGF receptors as well as the expression of at least two distinct membrane-spanning forms of the FGF receptors. The diverse forms appear to be generated by alternative splicing of mRNA and selective use of polyadenylation signals.     

Nedd4‐1 binds and ubiquitylates activated FGFR1 to control its endocytosis and function

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) has critical roles in cellular proliferation and differentiation during animal development and adult homeostasis. Here, we show that human Nedd4 (Nedd4‐1), an E3 ubiquitin ligase comprised of a C2 domain, 4 WW domains, and a Hect domain, regulates endocytosis and signalling of FGFR1. Nedd4‐1 binds directly to and ubiquitylates activated FGFR1, by interacting primarily via its WW3 domain with a novel non‐canonical sequence (non‐PY motif) on FGFR1. Deletion of this recognition motif (FGFR1‐Δ6) abolishes Nedd4‐1 binding and receptor ubiquitylation, and impairs endocytosis of activated receptor, as also observed upon Nedd4‐1 knockdown. Accordingly, FGFR1‐Δ6, or Nedd4‐1 knockdown, exhibits sustained FGF‐dependent receptor Tyr phosphorylation and downstream signalling (activation of FRS2α, Akt, Erk1/2, and PLCγ). Expression of FGFR1‐Δ6 in human embryonic neural stem cells strongly promotes FGF2‐dependent neuronal differentiation. Furthermore, expression of this FGFR1‐Δ6 mutant in zebrafish embryos disrupts anterior neuronal patterning (head development), consistent with excessive FGFR1 signalling. These results identify Nedd4‐1 as a key regulator of FGFR1 endocytosis and signalling during neuronal differentiation and embryonic development.     

Characterization of FGFRL1, a novel fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor preferentially expressed in skeletal tissues

Clones for a novel transmembrane receptor termed FGFRL1 were isolated from a subtracted, cartilage-specific cDNA library prepared from chicken sterna. Homologous sequences were identified in other vertebrates, including man, mouse, rat and fish, but not in invertebrates such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila. FGFRL1 was expressed preferentially in skeletal tissues as demonstrated by Northern blotting and in situ hybridization. Small amounts of the FGFRL1 mRNA were also detected in other tissues such as skeletal muscle and heart. The novel protein contained three extracellular Ig-like domains that were related to the members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor family. However, it lacked the intracellular protein tyrosine kinase domain required for signal transduction by transphosphorylation. When expressed in cultured cells as a fusion protein with green fluorescent protein, FGFRL1 was specifically localized to the plasma membrane where it might interact with FGF ligands. Recombinant FGFRL1 protein was produced in a baculovirus system with intact disulfide bonds. Similar to FGF receptors, the expressed protein interacted specifically with heparin and with FGF2. When overexpressed in MG-63 osteosarcoma cells, the novel receptor had a negative effect on cell proliferation. Taken together our data are consistent with the view that FGFRL1 acts as a decoy receptor for FGF ligands.     

MPTP delta, a putative murine homolog of HPTP delta, is expressed in specialized regions of the brain and in the B-cell lineage.

Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), together with protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs), are involved in the regulation of cell activation, growth, and differentiation. To further elucidate the fine tuning of cell growth and differentiation through tyrosine phosphorylation, we tried to isolate mouse receptor-type PTP (RPTP) cDNA clones by screening mouse brain cDNA libraries with mouse CD45 PTP domain probes under reduced-stringency conditions. Characterization of isolated cDNA clones for RPTP showed that the cytoplasmic region contains two tandem repeats of PTP domain of about 230 amino acids with intrinsic phosphatase activity. The extracellular region was composed of immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domains and fibronectin type III (FN-III)-like domains. The gene was highly homologous to human PTP delta (HPTP delta) and thus was named MPTP delta (murine counterpart of HPTP delta). The MPTP delta gene appeared to generate at least three species of mRNA, which differ in the composition of the extracellular domain: type A, one Ig-like and four FN-III-like domains; type B, one Ig-like and eight FN-III-like domains; and type C, three Ig-like and eight FN-III-like domains. Interestingly, the 5' untranslated region and the leader peptide of types A and B were completely different from those of type C. Northern (RNA) blot analysis demonstrated that brain, kidney, and heart cells express three mRNA species of about 7 kb. Antibody directed against part of the extracellular domain of type A MPTP delta recognized a 210-kDa protein in brain and kidney lysates. In situ hybridization of brain samples revealed that MPTP delta mRNA is present in the hippocampus, thalamic reticular nucleus, and piriform cortex, where some Src family PTKs have been also demonstrated to exist. Although MPTP delta mRNA was not detected in lymphoid tissues, all of the pre-B-cell lines tested and one of three B-cell lines tested expressed MPTP delta mRNA, whereas antibody-producing B-cell hybridomas and T-cell and macrophage lines did not. Finally, the MPTP delta locus was tightly linked to the brown (b) locus on mouse chromosome 4.     

Growth factor control of skeletal muscle differentiation: commitment to terminal differentiation occurs in G1 phase and is repressed by fibroblast growth factor

Analysis of MM14 mouse myoblasts demonstrates that terminal differentiation is repressed by pure preparations of both acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF). Basic FGF is approximately 30-fold more potent than acidic FGF and it exhibits half maximal activity in clonal assays at 0.03 ng/ml (2 pM). FGF repression occurs only during the G1 phase of the cell cycle by a mechanism that appears to be independent of ongoing cell proliferation. When exponentially growing myoblasts are deprived of FGF, cells become postmitotic within 2-3 h, express muscle-specific proteins within 6-7 h, and commence fusion within 12-14 h. Although expression of these three terminal differentiation phenotypes occurs at different times, all are initiated by a single regulatory "commitment" event in G1. The entire population commits to terminal differentiation within 12.5 h of FGF removal as all cells complete the cell cycle and move into G1. Differentiation does not require a new round of DNA synthesis. Comparison of MM14 behavior with other myoblast types suggests a general model for skeletal muscle development in which specific growth factors serve the dual role of stimulating myoblast proliferation and directly repressing terminal differentiation.     

Cellular signaling by fibroblast growth factor receptors

The 22 members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family of growth factors mediate their cellular responses by binding to and activating the different isoforms encoded by the four receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) designated FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3 and FGFR4. Unlike other growth factors, FGFs act in concert with heparin or heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) to activate FGFRs and to induce the pleiotropic responses that lead to the variety of cellular responses induced by this large family of growth factors. A variety of human skeletal dysplasias have been linked to specific point mutations in FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3 leading to severe impairment in cranial, digital and skeletal development. Gain of function mutations in FGFRs were also identified in a variety of human cancers such as myeloproliferative syndromes, lymphomas, prostate and breast cancers as well as other malignant diseases. The binding of FGF and HSPG to the extracellular ligand domain of FGFR induces receptor dimerization, activation and autophosphorylation of multiple tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor molecule. A variety of signaling proteins are phosphorylated in response to FGF stimulation including Shc, phospholipase-Cgamma, STAT1, Gab1 and FRS2alpha leading to stimulation of intracellular signaling pathways that control cell proliferation, cell differentiation, cell migration, cell survival and cell shape. The docking proteins FRS2alpha and FRS2beta are major mediators of the Ras/MAPK and PI-3 kinase/Akt signaling pathways as well as negative feedback mechanisms that fine-tune the signal that is initiated at the cell surface following FGFR stimulation.     

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) inhibits chondrocyte function and growth hormone action directly at the growth plate

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) modulates glucose and lipid metabolism during fasting. In addition, previous evidence indicates that increased expression of FGF21 during chronic food restriction is associated with reduced bone growth and growth hormone (GH) insensitivity. In light of the inhibitory effects on growth plate chondrogenesis mediated by other FGFs, we hypothesized that FGF21 causes growth inhibition by acting directly at the long bones' growth plate. We first demonstrated the expression of FGF21, FGFR1 and FGFR3 (two receptors known to be activated by FGF21) and β-klotho (a co-receptor required for the FGF21-mediated receptor binding and activation) in fetal and 3-week-old mouse growth plate chondrocytes. We then cultured mouse growth plate chondrocytes in the presence of graded concentrations of rhFGF21 (0.01-10 μg/ml). Higher concentrations of FGF21 (5 and 10 μg/ml) inhibited chondrocyte thymidine incorporation and collagen X mRNA expression. 10 ng/ml GH stimulated chondrocyte thymidine incorporation and collagen X mRNA expression, with both effects prevented by the addition in the culture medium of FGF21 in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, FGF21 reduced GH binding in cultured chondrocytes. In cells transfected with FGFR1 siRNA or ERK 1 siRNA, the antagonistic effects of FGF21 on GH action were all prevented, supporting a specific effect of this growth factor in chondrocytes. Our findings suggest that increased expression of FGF21 during food restriction causes growth attenuation by antagonizing the GH stimulatory effects on chondrogenesis directly at the growth plate. In addition, high concentrations of FGF21 may directly suppress growth plate chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation.     

Thyroid hormone activates fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 in bone

Thyroid hormone (T3) and the T3 receptor (TR) alpha gene are essential for bone development whereas adult hyperthyroidism increases the risk of osteoporotic fracture. We isolated fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 (FGFR1) as a T3-target gene in osteoblasts by subtraction hybridization. FGFR1 mRNA was induced 2- to 3-fold in osteoblasts treated with T3 for 6-48 h, and FGFR1 protein was stimulated 2- to 4-fold. Induction of FGFR1 was independent of mRNA half-life and abolished by actinomycin D and cycloheximide, indicating the involvement of an intermediary protein. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) stimulated MAPK in osteoblasts, and pretreatment with T3 for 6 h induced a more rapid response to FGF that was increased in magnitude by 2- to 3-fold. Similarly, T3 enhanced FGF2-activated autophosphorylation of FGFR1, but did not modify FGF2-induced phosphorylation of the docking protein FRS2. These effects were abolished by the FGFR-selective inhibitors PD166866 and PD161570. In situ hybridization analyses of TRalpha-knockout mice, which have impaired ossification and skeletal mineralization, revealed reduced FGFR1 mRNA expression in osteoblasts and osteocytes, whereas T3 failed to stimulate FGFR1 mRNA or enhance FGF2-activated MAPK signaling in TRalpha-null osteoblasts. These findings implicate FGFR1 signaling in T3-dependent bone development and the pathogenesis of skeletal disorders resulting from thyroid disease.     

Association of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 with the adaptor protein Grb14. Characterization of a new receptor binding partner

Using the cytoplasmic domain of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen, Grb14 was identified as a FGFR1 binding partner. A kinase-inactive mutant of FGFR1 failed to interact with Grb14, indicating that activation of FGFR1 is necessary for binding. Deletion of the C-tail or mutation of both C-tail tyrosine residues of FGFR1 to phenylalanine abolished binding, and deletion of the juxtamembrane domain of the receptor reduced binding, suggesting that Grb14 binds to FGFR1 at multiple sites. Co-immunoprecipitation and in vitro binding assays demonstrated that binding of Grb14 to FGFR1 in mammalian cells was dependent on receptor activation by fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). Deletion of the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain of Grb14 reduced but did not block binding to FGFR1 and eliminated dependence on receptor activation. The SH2 domain alone bound both FGFR1 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, whereas full-length Grb14 bound only FGFR1, suggesting that regions upstream of the SH2 domain confer specificity for FGFR1. Grb14 was phosphorylated on serine and threonine residues in unstimulated cells, and treatment with FGF-2 enhanced this phosphorylation. Expression of exogenous Grb14 inhibited FGF-2-induced cell proliferation, whereas a point-mutated form of Grb14 incapable of binding to FGFR1 enhanced FGF-2-induced mitogenesis. These data demonstrate an interaction between activated FGFR1 and Grb14 and suggest a role for Grb14 in FGF signaling.     

Two FGF receptor genes are differentially expressed in epithelial and mesenchymal tissues during limb formation and organogenesis in the mouse.

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) can influence the growth and differentiation of cultured cells derived from neuroectoderm, ectoderm or mesenchyme. The FGFs interact with a family of at least four closely related receptor tyrosine kinases that are products of individual genes. To investigate the role of FGFs in the growth and differentiation of embryonic tissues and to determine whether the individual FGF receptor genes might have specific functions, we compared the localization of mRNA for two FGF receptor genes, FGFR1 (the flg gene product) and FGFR2 (the bek gene product), during limb formation and organogenesis in mouse embryos (E9.5-E16.5). Although the two genes were coexpressed in some tissues, the differential expression of FGFR1 and FGFR2 in most embryonic tissues was striking. FGFR1 was expressed diffusely in mesenchyme of limb buds, somites and organ rudiments. In contrast, FGFR2 was expressed predominantly in the epithelial cells of embryonic skin and of developing organs. The differential expression of FGFR1 and FGFR2 in mesenchyme and epithelium respectively, suggests the receptor genes are independently regulated and that they mediate different functions of FGFs during development.     

Interdependent fibroblast growth factor and activin A signaling promotes the expression of endodermal genes in differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells expressing Src Homology 2-domain inactive Shb

Abstract The mechanisms controlling endodermal development during stem cell differentiation have been only partly elucidated, although previous studies have suggested the participation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and activin A in these processes. Shb is a Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing adapter protein that has been implicated in FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) signaling. To study the putative crosstalk between activin A and Shb-dependent FGF signaling in the differentiation of endoderm from embryonic stem (ES) cells, embryoid bodies (EBs) derived from mouse ES cells overexpressing wild-type Shb or Shb with a mutated SH2 domain (R522K-Shb) were cultured in the presence of activin A. We show that expression of R522K-Shb results in up-regulation of FGFR1 and FGF2 in EBs. Addition of activin A to the cultures enhances the expression of endodermal genes primarily in EBs expressing mutant Shb. Inhibition of FGF signaling by the addition of the FGFR1 inhibitor SU5402 completely counteracts the synergistic effects of R522K-Shb and activin A. In conclusion, the present results suggest that expression of R522K-Shb enhances certain signaling pathways downstream of FGF and that an interplay between FGF and activin A participates in ES cell differentiation to endoderm.     

Sef interacts with TAK1 and mediates JNK activation and apoptosis

Sef was recently identified as a negative regulator of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in a genetic screen of zebrafish and subsequently in mouse and humans. By inhibiting FGFR1 tyrosine phosphorylation and/or Ras downstream events, Sef inhibits FGF-mediated ERK activation and cell proliferation as well as PC12 cell differentiation. Here we show that Sef and a deletion mutant of Sef lacking the extracellular domain (SefIC) physically interact with TAK1 (transforming growth factor-beta-associated kinase) and activate JNK through a TAK1-MKK4-JNK pathway. Sef and SefIC overexpression also resulted in apoptotic cell death, while dominant negative forms of MKK4 and TAK1 blocked Sef-mediated JNK activation and attendant 293T cell apoptosis. These investigations reveal a novel activating function of Sef that is distinct from its inhibitory effect on FGF receptor signaling and ERK activation.