Aromatization inhibition alone or in combination with GnRH agonists for the treatment of premenopausal breast cancer patients.

Aromatase inhibition in postmenopausal women causes a marked fall in the plasma levels of oestrogens and is an effective treatment for breast cancer, however, trials with aminoglutethimide found that this aromatase inhibitor was ineffective in suppressing plasma oestrogen levels in premenopausal breast cancer patients. We found that the more potent inhibitor, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), which can suppress oestrogen synthesis in rodents and non-human primates with intact ovarian function, was also unsuccessful as an oestrogen suppressant in premenopausal women at its maximum tolerated dose (500 mg/week i.m.). GnRH agonists are effective suppressants of ovarian oestrogen synthesis but oestrogen production from peripheral sites is unaffected. Our studies of a combination of the GnRH agonist goserelin and 4-OHA demonstrated that the combination caused greater oestrogen suppression than goserelin alone and led to objective clinical response in 4/6 breast cancer patients after their relapse from treatment with goserelin as a single agent. The combination of a GnRH agonist and an aromatase inhibitor should be subjected to clinical trials.     

Aromatase and other inhibitors in breast and prostatic cancer

Estrogens have an important role in the growth of breast and other hormone-sensitive cancers. We have shown that 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) selectively blocks estrogen synthesis by inhibiting aromatase activity in ovarian and peripheral tissues and reduces plasma estrogen levels in rat and non-human primate species. In postmenopausal men and women, estrogens are mainly of peripheral origin. When postmenopausal breast cancer patients were administered either by daily oral or parenteral weekly treatment with 4-OHA, plasma estrogen concentrations were significantly reduced. Complete or partial response to treatment occurred in 34% of 100 patients with advanced breast cancer, while the disease was stabilized in 12%. We recently studied the effects of 4-OHA and other aromatase inhibitors, 10-propargylestr-4-ene-3,17-dione (PED) and imidazo[1,5-]3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrin-6-yl-(4-benzonitrile) (CGS 16949A) as well as 5-reductase inhibitors, N,N-diethyl-4-methyl-3-oxo-4-aza-5-androstane-17β-carboxyamide (4-MA) and 17β-hydroxy-4-aza-4-methyl-19norandrost-5-en-3-one (L651190) in prostatic tissue from 11 patients with prostatic cancer and six patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), and from normal men at autopsy. We attempted to measure aromatase activity in tissue incubation by quantitating ³H₂O released during aromatization of androstenedione or testosterone labeled at the C-1 position. The amount of ³H₂O released from all samples was at least twice that of the heat inactivated tissue samples. The ³H₂O release was significantly inhibited by 4-OHA and 4-MA, but not by the other aromatase inhibitors. However, when HPLC and TLC were used to isolate steroid products, no estrone or estradiol was detected in the incubates. Furthermore, no aromatase mRNA was detected following amplification by PCR. The 4-OHA was found to inhibit 5-reductase in both BPH and cancer tissue, although to a lesser extent than 4-MA. The other aromatase inhibitors were without effect. Although a mechanism involving intraprostatic aromatase is not likely, inhibitors may act to reduce peripherally-formed estrogens. In postmenopausal breast cancer, the results indicate that 4-OHA is of significant benefit.     

Aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer

A number of inhibitors of estrogen synthesis are now becoming available which could be of value in the treatment of breast cancer. 4-Hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), the first of these compounds to enter the clinic has been found to be effective in postmenopausal patients who have relapsed from tamoxifen. Thus, in studies of 240 patients, 26% patients experienced partial or complete response to treatment. An additional 25% patients had disease stabilization. 4-OHA is a potent selective, steroidal inhibitor which causes inactivation of aromatase in vitro. It is effective in reducing concentrations of ovarian estrogens in rats and of ovarian and peripheral estrogens in non-human primate species. The compound has been shown to lower serum estrogen levels in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. However, not all of these patients experienced disease remission, suggesting that their tumors were hormone insensitive rather than that the dose of 4-OHA was suboptimal. In trials of patients who had not received prior tamoxifen treatment, 4-OHA (250 mg i.m. every 2 weeks) was found to induce complete or partial tumor regression in 33% of patients. The response of patients was not significantly different from that observed in patients treated with tamoxifen (30 mg o.d) of 37%. No significant difference between treatments was observed for disease stabilization, the duration of response or median survival. Several other steroidal aromatase inhibitors have been studied, such as 7-substituted androstenedione derivatives. MDL 18962 [10-(2-propynyl)estr-4-ene-3,17-dione] and FCE 24304 (6-methylen-androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione) are currently in clinical trials. Non-steroidal inhibitors of cytochrome P-450 enzymes, such as imidazole and triazole derivatives have been developed which are highly selective for aromatase. Three triazoles which are very potent and selective inhibitors are vorazole (6-[(4-chlorophenyl)(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-methyl]1-methyl-1H-benzotriazole R 76713, arimidex 2,2′[5-( -1,2,4-triazol-1-yl methyl)-1,3-phenylene]bis(2-methylpropiononitrile) (ZD1033) and letrozole 4-[1-(cyanophenyl)-1-(1,2,4-triazolyl)methyl]benzonitril (CGS 20267). These compounds reduce serum estradiol concentration to undetectable levels in breast cancer patients. These highly potent inhibitors provide the opportunity to determine whether a further degree of estrogen suppression will be important in producing greater clinical response. With the recent approval of 4-OHA in several countries and the introduction of the potent new compounds, aromatase inhibitors either alone or in combination with the antiestrogen are likely to improve the treatment of breast cancer.     

Mechanisms of the actions of aromatase inhibitors 4-hydroxyandrostenedione, fadrozole, and aminoglutethimide on aromatase in JEG-3 cell culture

Selective inhibition of estrogen production with aromatase inhibitors has been found to be an effective strategy for breast cancer treatment. Most studies have focused on inhibitor screening and in vitro kinetic analysis of aromatase inhibition using placental microsomes. In order to determine the effects of different inhibitors on aromatase in the whole cell, we have utilized the human choriocarcinoma cell line, JEG-3 in culture to compare and study three classes of aromatase inhibitors, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione, fadrozole (CGS 16949A), and aminoglutethimide. Fadrozole is the most potent competitive inhibitor and aminoglutethimide is the least potent among the three. However, stimulation of aromatase activity was found to occur when JEG-3 cells were preincubated with aminoglutethimide. In contrast, 4-OHA and fadrozole caused sustained inhibition of aromatase activity in both JEG-3 cells and placental microsomes, which was not reversed even after the removal of the inhibitors. 4-OHA bound irreversibly to the active site of aromatase and caused inactivation of the enzyme which followed pseudo-first order kinetics. However, 4-OHA appears to be metabolized rapidly in JEG-3 cells. Sustained inhibition of aromatase induced by fadrozole occurs by a different mechanism. Although fadrozole bound tightly to aromatase at a site distinct from the steroid binding site, the inhibition of aromatase activity by fadrozole does not involve a reactive process. None of the inhibitors stimulated aromatase mRNA synthesis in JEG-3 cells during 8 h treatment. The stimulation of aromatase activity by AG appeared to be due to stabilization of aromatase protein. According to these results, 4-OHA and fadrozole would be expected to be more beneficial in the treatment of breast cancer patients than AG. The increase in aromatase activity by AG may counteract its therapeutic effect and might be partially responsible for relapse of breast cancer patients from this treatment.     

Comparative clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetic interactions of aromatase inhibitors

The clinical development of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) has been closely guided by clinical pharmacological investigations. During the early phases of development studies were focused on dose-related pharmacological effectiveness and specificity. More recently attention has been given to the metabolic changes which AIs elicit, with particular regard to their potential use in early breast cancer and the prophylactic setting. Pharmacological effectiveness has been studied with plasma oestrogen assays but primary oestrogens (E1 and E2) are not helpful in comparing the third generation inhibitors: anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane. All three of these compounds suppress whole body aromatisation by >96%. Most recently, we have established that significantly greater inhibition is achieved by letrozole than anastrozole at their clinically used dosages. This more complete inhibition is paralleled by significantly greater suppression of E1S.

A broad panel of endocrine investigations has indicated that these compounds have essentially complete specificity at their clinical dosages. A minor androgenic effect of exemestane is revealed by a significant suppression of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). Lipid and bone biomarker data are being collected in many current studies. A pharmacokinetic interaction has been established between letrozole and tamoxifen, whereby reduced circulating levels of letrozole are found with combined application. Neither anastrozole nor letrozole have any effect on plasma concentrations of tamoxifen when given in combination with it.     

Aromatase and its inhibitors--an overview

Estrogen synthesis by aromatase occurs in a number of tissues throughout the body. Strategies which reduce production of estrogen offer useful means of treating hormone-dependent breast cancer. Initially, several steroidal compounds were determined to be selective inhibitors of aromatase. The most potent of these, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) inhibits aromatase competitively but also causes inactivation of the enzyme. A number of other steroidal inhibitors appear to act by this mechanism also. In contrast, the newer imidazole compounds are reversible, competitive inhibitors. In vivo studies demonstrated that 4-OHA inhibited aromatase activity in ovarian and peripheral tissues and reduced plasma estrogen levels in rat and non-human primate species. In rats with mammary tumors, reduction in ovarian estrogen production was correlated with tumor regression. 4-OHA was also found to inhibit gonadotropin levels in animals in a dose-dependent manner. The mechanism of this effect appears to be associated with the weak androgenic activity of the compound. Together with aromatase inhibition, this action may contribute to reducing the growth stimulating effects of estrogen. A series of studies have now been completed in postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with 4-OHA either 500 mg/2 weeks or weekly, or 250 mg/2 weeks. These doses did not affect gonadotropin levels. Plasma estrogen concentrations were significantly reduced. Complete or partial tumor regression occurred in 26% of the patients and the disease was stabilized in 25% of the patients. The results suggest that 4-OHA is of benefit to postmenopausal patients who have relapsed from prior hormonal therapies. Several of the steroidal inhibitors are now entering clinical trials as well as non-steroidal compounds which are more potent and selective than aminoglutethimide. Aromatase inhibitors should provide several useful additions to the treatment of breast cancer.     

Aromatase and its inhibitors

Inhibitors of aromatase (estrogen synthetase) have been developed as treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer. Both steroidal substrate analogs, type I inhibitors, which inactivate the enzyme and non-steroidal competitive reversible, type II inhibitors, are now available. 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), the first selective aromatase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce serum estrogen concentrations and cause complete and partial responses in approximately 25% of patients with hormone responsive disease who have relapsed from previous endocrine treatment. Letrozole (CGS 20, 269) and anastrozole (ZN 1033) have been recently approved for treatment. Both suppress serum estrogen levels to the limit of assay detection. Letrozole has been shown to be significantly superior to megace in overall response rates and time to treatment failure, whereas anastrozole was found to improve survival in comparison to megace. Both were better tolerated than the latter. The potential of aromatase within the breast as a significant source of estrogen mediating tumor proliferation and which might determine the outcome of inhibitor treatment was explored. Using immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization, aromatase and mRNA_arom was detected mainly in the epithelial cells of the terminal ductal lobular units (TDLU) of the normal breast and also in breast tumor epithelial cells as well as some stromal cells. Increase in proliferation, measured by increased thymidine incorporation into DNA and by PCNA immunostaining in response to testosterone was observed in histocultures of breast cancer samples. This effect could be inhibited by 4-OHA and implies that intratumoral aromatase has functional significance. An intratumoral aromatase model in the ovariectomized nude mouse was developed which simulated the hormone responsive postmenopausal breast cancer patient. This model also allows evaluation of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens in tumors of estrogen receptor positive, human breast carcinoma cells transfected with the human aromatase gene. Thus, the cells synthesized estrogen which stimulated tumor formation. Both aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens were effective in suppressing tumor growth in this model. However, letrozole was more effective than tamoxifen. When the aromatase inhibitors were combined with tamoxifen, tumor growth was suppressed to about the same extent as with the aromatase inhibitors alone. Thus, there was no additive or synergistic effects of combining tamoxifen with aromatase inhibitors. This suggests that sequential treatment with these agents is likely to be more beneficial to the patient in terms of longer response to treatment.     

Aromatase inhibitors: basic and clinical studies

Application of aromatase inhibitors to the treatment of conditions in which estrogen plays, a role is discussed. Studies in vitro demonstrate that 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) is a potent inhibitor of aromatase. The compound reduces ovariant estrogen production and causes regression of carcinogen (DMBA)-induced mammary tumors in the rat. In the rhesus monkey, 4-OHA was also shown to inhibit peripheral aromatization. To date 58 postmenopausal breast cancer patients with advanced metastatic disease have received 500 mg im weekly while 31 patients received 250 mg 4-OHA orally per day. Estradiol levels were significantly reduced in all patients from a mean of 7.2 + 0.8 pg/ml to 2.8 + 0.3 pg/ml. Of patients receiving 4-OHA im 27% had partial or complete responses and in 10% of patients the disease was stabilized. Similar responses occurred in the patients receiving 4-OHA orally. These results suggest that 4-OHA is effective and that this compound and other aromatase inhibitors could be valuable new additions to the treatment of breast cancer.     

Where do selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) now fit into breast cancer treatment algorithms?

The agents used for endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer have changed markedly over the past decade. Tamoxifen remains the anti-oestrogen of choice, but could be replaced by the oestrogen receptor down-regulator ICI 182780 or by the fixed ring triphenylethylene arzoxifene (previously SERM III) soon. Whilst aminoglutethimide and 4-OH androstenedione were the aromatase inhibitors of choice, they have been replaced by non-steroidal (anastrozole and letrozole) and steroidal (exemestane) inhibitors of high potency and low side effect profile. Previously, often used treatments such as progestogens (megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate) and androgens are now rarely used or confined to fourth or fifth line treatments. The LHRH agonist, goserelin, remains the treatment of choice for pre-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer although recent randomised trials indicate a response, time to progression and survival advantage for the combination of goserelin and tamoxifen compared with goserelin alone.

The newer treatments have led to questions concerning the optimum sequence of agents to use in advanced breast cancer and as neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapy in relation to surgery. Two trials of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen and one trial of letrozole compared with tamoxifen indicate that the new triazole aromatase inhibitors have a significant advantage over the anti-oestrogen with respect to time to progression and survival. Similarly, triazole aromatase inhibitors give faster and more complete responses compared with tamoxifen when used in post-menopausal women before surgery.

Major research questions remain with respect to the aromatase inhibitors used as adjuvant therapy. Anastrozole is being tested alone or in combination with tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen in the ‘so-called’ ATAC trial. Over 9000 patients have been randomised to this important study: the results will be available late-2001. A similar study comparing letrozole and tamoxifen started recently under the auspices of the Breast International Group. Importantly, this trial is also comparing the sequence of tamoxifen followed by letrozole (or vice versa). A similar trial of exemestane given after 2–3 years of tamoxifen compared with 5 years of tamoxifen is recruiting well as is a study comparing letrozole (or placebo) for 5 years after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. These studies may show that aromatase inhibitors are superior to tamoxifen or that a sequence is preferable.

ICI 182780 causes complete oestrogen receptor down-regulation leading to a the lack of agonist activity of the drug. Two trials of ICI 182780 compared with anastrozole for advanced disease will report later this year and a comparison with tamoxifen next year. Arzoxifene (SERM III) is being tested against tamoxifen. These studies are likely to result in new anti-oestrogens being introduced into the clinic.

Most of our endocrine treatments deprived the tumour cell of oestradiol. In vitro experiments with MCF-7 cells indicate that tumour cells can adapt and then grow in response to low oestrogen concentrations in the tissue—culture medium. Importantly, the cells were shown to apoptose in response to high oestrogen concentrations. A recent clinical trial has demonstrated a high response rate to stilboestrol given after a median of four previous oestrogen depriving endocrine therapies. These data and the newer treatments available indicate a need to re-think our general approach to endocrine therapy and endocrine prevention.     

Aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapies in patients with breast cancer

There is increasing evidence that endocrine therapy has an important role in patients with oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Several large meta-analyses have reinforced the value of both ovarian ablation and tamoxifen in improving survival. Over the past decade, aromatase inhibitors have become the treatment of choice for second-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer, and the third generation inhibitors have now an established reputation for good patient tolerability. Early studies indicated that aminoglutethimide/hydrocortisone could benefit postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer, and in 2001, the ATAC study showed that the third generation aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, seemed superior to tamoxifen in that anastrozole-treated patients had a longer disease-free survival. Other studies will report on the relative merits of the steroidal inhibitor exemestane as well as non-steroidal letrozole. The exact duration and sequencing of treatment, together with the long-term effects on bone are at present, unknown.     

Presurgical (neoadjuvant) endocrine therapy is a useful model to predict response and outcome to endocrine treatment in breast cancer patients

Endocrine therapy of breast cancer has been improved continuously during the last decades. Currently, aromatase inhibitors are dominating treatment algorithms for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer while tamoxifen still is the most widely used drug for premenopausal women. Several research tools and study designs have been used to challenge established drugs and develop the field of antihormonal therapy. One pivotal study option has been the observation of clinical responses during presurgical/neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (PSET/NET). This strategy has several major advantages. First, the breast tumor, still present in the patient's breast during therapy, can be followed by clinical observations and radiological measurements and any treatment effect will be immediately registered. Second, tumor biopsies may be obtained before initiation and following therapy allowing intra-patient comparisons. These tumor-biopsies may be used for the evaluation of intra-tumor changes associated with drug treatment. As examples, presurgical breast cancer trials have been used to evaluate intra-tumor estrogen levels during therapy with aromatase inhibitors and also to study mechanisms involved in the adaptation processes to estrogen suppression. Biomarker studies have provided information that may be used for patient selection in the future. Finally, recently published results from presurgical trials testing combinations of classical endocrine drugs and novel targeted therapies have produced promising results.     

Effects of 4-hydroxyandrostenedione and hyperstimulation with pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin on early embryonic development in rats

A possible role of high oestradiol levels in mediating the adverse effects of hyperstimulation with pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG) on early embryonic development in the rat was investigated using an aromatase inhibitor, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), to inhibit endogenous oestradiol production. Three experiments were conducted in this study. In the first, varying doses of 4-OHA were administered either concurrently with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to pro-oestrus female rats hyperstimulated at early di-oestrus stage with 20 IU PMSG or alone into nonhyperstimulated pro-oestrus females. At high doses of 1000, 2000, or 5000 microg/rat, 4-OHA substantially improved the survival of embryos in hyperstimulated females, while low doses of 100 and 500 microg/rat were ineffective. The protective effect of 4-OHA on embryo count was optimum at 2000 microg. When administered alone, only the highest dose of 5000 microg/rat 4-OHA increased embryo count. In the second experiment, higher doses of PMSG were studied (30 or 40 IU), with or without 5000 microg/rat 4-OHA given at the time of hCG injection. PMSG proved to be more detrimental with increasing dose, and 5000 microg/rat 4-OHA was able to rescue embryos from death in the 30, but not 40, PMSG group. In the third experiment, the influence of the timing of 4-OHA treatment on its ability to improve the embryo count in hyperstimulated females was examined by introducing 4-OHA 24 h earlier, rather than at the time of hCG treatment. The results showed the importance of timing of 4-OHA administration, as 5000 microg/rat 4-OHA was able to restore embryo survival in the 40 PMSG hyperstimulated group only when it was administered 24 h before hCG injection. Together, these results highlighted that 4-OHA, when administered at the appropriate time and dose, could reverse the negative effects of hyperstimulation from PMSG on early embryonic development. This may be due to its potent aromatase inhibiting properties that lead to the suppression of oestrogen production, thereby alleviating the supraphysiological level of oestradiol, which is typically present in PMSG-treated females. Interestingly, 4-OHA treatment on its own was able to positively influence embryo count when given at a high dose of 5000 microg/rat, and this may be associated with its weak androgenic properties. In conclusion, this study supports the hypothesis that excessive oestradiol is responsible for the negative effects of hyperstimulation with PMSG on early embryonic development.     

Aromatase inhibitors: assessment of biochemical efficacy measured by total body aromatase inhibition and tissue estrogen suppression

The implementation of aromatase inhibitors for treatment of early and metastatic breast cancer has been one of the major improvements in endocrine therapy of breast cancer. Measurement of endocrine effects of aromatase inhibition in vivo has been a major tool in the process of evaluating novel compounds. Biochemical efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in vivo may be determined from their effects on “total body aromatization” as well changes in plasma and tissue estrogen levels. Due to high sensitivity, tracer methods allowing calculation of whole body aromatase inhibition are still considered the gold standard. The method developed by our group in collaboration with the Royal Marsden Hospital and the results of this joint program are summarized and discussed. These studies allowed classification of the different aromatase inhibitors and their optimal dosage, selecting the best compounds for clinical evaluation. In vivo total body aromatase assessment is a work-consuming method, allowing such studies to be conducted in a limited number of patients only. In contrast, plasma estrogen measurement is a cruder but simpler method, allowing screening of larger groups of patients. As plasma estrogens arise through passive diffusion of estrogens synthesized in different body compartments, plasma estrogens, as well as total body aromatase assessment, present a rough estimate of total body tissue estrogen production, and changes associated with treatment with aromatase inhibitors reflect the effects on tissue estrogen production in general. However, plasma estrogen levels do not correlate to breast cancer tissue estrogen levels. This is due to the endocrine autonomy of breast cancer tissue with significant local estrogen production in some tumors. Thus, direct measurement of intratumor estrogens is demanded to evaluate the effects of aromatase inhibitors in malignant target tissues. Our group has developed a highly sensitive HPLC-RIA for the simultaneous measurement of estrone, estradiol, and estrone sulfate in malignant breast tissue samples, and we are currently using this method to assess alterations in intratumor estrogen levels during treatment with different aromatase inhibitors.     

Development and evolution of therapies targeted to the estrogen receptor for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

This article describes the origins and evolution of "antiestrogenic" medicines for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Developing drugs that target the estrogen receptor (ER) either directly (tamoxifen) or indirectly (aromatase inhibitors) has improved the prognosis of breast cancer and significantly advanced healthcare. The development of the principles for treatment and the success of the concept, in practice, has become a model for molecular medicine and presaged the current testing of numerous targeted therapies for all forms of cancer. The translational research with tamoxifen to target the ER with the appropriate duration (5 years) of adjuvant therapy has contributed to the falling national death rates from breast cancer. Additionally, exploration of the endocrine pharmacology of tamoxifen and related nonsteroidal antiestrogen (e.g. keoxifene now known as raloxifene) resulted in the laboratory recognition of selective ER modulation and the translation of the concept to use raloxifene for the prevention of osteoporosis and breast cancer. However, the extensive evaluation of tamoxifen treatment revealed small but significant side effects such as endometrial cancer, blood clots and the development of acquired resistance. The solution was to develop drugs that targeted the aromatase enzyme specifically to prevent the conversion of androstenedione to estrone and subsequently estradiol. The successful translational research with the suicide inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (known as formestane) pioneered the development of a range of oral aromatase inhibitors that are either suicide inhibitors (exemestane) or competitive inhibitors (letrozole and anastrozole) of the aromatase enzyme. Treatment with aromatase inhibitors is proving effective and is associated with reduction in the incidence of endometrial cancer and blood clots when compared with tamoxifen and there is also limited cross resistance so treatment can be sequential. Current clinical trials are addressing the value of aromatase inhibitors as chemopreventive agents for postmenopausal women.     

Exemestane,a new steroidal aromatase inhibitor of clinical relevance

Breast cancer is the leading cause of death among women and the contribution of circulating oestrogens to the growth of some mammary tumours has been recognized. Consequently, suppression of oestrogen action by inhibition of their biosynthesis at the androstenedione-oestrone aromatization step, by means of selective inhibitors of the enzyme aromatase, has become an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer. Exemestane (6-methylenandrosta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione) is a novel steroidal irreversible aromatase inhibitor recently approved and introduced into the global market under the name Aromasin. The design, laboratory and viable syntheses of exemestane, starting from a variety of steroidal precursors, are presented and discussed. Data from biochemical and pharmacological studies as well as the clinical impact of the compound are briefly reviewed. The drug is an orally active and well-tolerated hormonal therapy for postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer that has become refractory to standard current hormonal therapies.     

Determination of 4-hydroxyandrostenedione in plasma and urine by extractive alkylation and electron-capture gas chromatography

A sensitive and specific quantitative assay has been developed for the determination of 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), a potent aromatase inhibitor used in the treatment of estrogen-dependent breast cancer. This steroid has a high first-pass metabolism and is extensively metabolized, mainly by glucuronidation. Plasma levels of unchanged 4-OHA are very low, even after high peroral doses. The analytical method is based on the addition of 17α-ethinylestradiol (internal standard), liquid-liquid extraction from biological material followed by extractive alkylation with pentafluorobenzyl bromide and quantitation by gas chromatography. The method has been validated for sensitivity, accuracy and precision and was found to be suitable for application to pharmacokinetic and bioavailability studies of peroral formulations of 4-OHA.     

Aromatase inhibitors and hormone-dependent cancers

Aromatase (estrogen synthetase) occurs in a variety of tissues. Using immunocytochemistry, we have recently located this enzyme in cellular compartments of several types of human tissue. Furthermore, we found the mRNA was located in the same structures where tested. As both gonadal and peripherally formed estrogen contribute to growth of hormone sensitive cancers, we have developed aromatase inhibitors to block synthesis of this hormone. We have determined that 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) selectively inhibits aromatase activity in ovarian and peripheral tissues and reduces plasma estrogen levels in rat and non-human primate species. 4-OHA was also found to inhibit gonadotropin levels and reduce estrogen and progesterone receptor levels in treated animals. The mechanism of these effects appear to be associated with the weak androgenic activity of the compound. These effects together with aromatase inhibition may result in a synergistic response reducing estrogen production and action. In postmenopausal women, estrogens are mainly of peripheral origin. When postmenopausal breast cancer patients were administered either daily oral or parenteral weekly treatment with 4-OHA at doses that did not affect their gonadotropin levels, plasma estrogen concentrations were significantly reduced. Complete or partial response to treatment occurred in 34% of 100 patients with advanced breast cancer, while the disease was stabilized in 12%. These results indicate that 4-OHA is of benefit in postmenopausal patients with advanced disease who have relapsed from prior hormonal therapies, and that steroidal inhibitors may be of value in premenopausal patients.     

Recent progress in development of aromatase inhibitors

In postmenopausal women with breast cancer, aromatase, which is the enzyme converting androstenedione to estrone and testosterone to estradiol, is the rate-limiting step in estrogen biosynthesis. The currently available aromatase inhibitor, aminogluethimide, effectively blocks estrogen production and produces tumor regressions in patients previously treated with tamoxifen. This drug, however, produces frequent side effects and blocks steroidogenic steps other than the aromatase enzyme. Thus, newer aromatase inhibitors with greater potency and specificity are under intense study. More than 20 such compounds have recently been developed. In several clinical trials, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione, given parenterally, has been highly active and specific for aromatase inhibition in patients with breast cancer. In two large recent studies, one-third of heavily pretreated women experienced objective tumor regression with this therapy. CGS 16949A, a newer agent, is also Phase II clinical trials. This compound is an imidazole derivative with nearly 1000-fold greater potency than aminoglutethimide. An initial Phase I study compared the potency of 0.6–16 mg daily in 12 postmenopausal women and found maximal suppression of urinary and plasma estrogens with 2 mg daily. The degree of inhibition was similar to that induced by aminoglutethimide or by surgical adrenalectomy. No CNS, hematologic or biochemical toxicity was observed. A larger Phase II study in 54 patients confirmed this high degree of potency of CGS since a plateau effect was observed at the 1.8, 2 and 4 mg daily doses. The endocrine effects were not absolutely specific as a blunting of ACTH-stimulated but not basal aldosterone levels were observed. This and other emerging aromatase inhibitors offer promise as pharmacologic methods to inhibit estrogen production specifically and without side effects.     

Predictors of response to aromatase inhibitors

Aromatase inhibitors are now considered to be part of the endocrine treatment for most hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in post-menopausal women for both early and advanced disease. Despite the impressive efficacy of these agents, up to 50% of treated patients exhibit de novo or intrinsic resistance to aromatase inhibitors and hence identification of response predictors is essential to allow treatment to be directed towards responsive populations and for alternative or additional therapies to be offered to resistant patients. Emerging data seem to suggest a role for the conventional tumour markers of oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor as possible predictors of response but, particularly in the adjuvant setting, the extent to which these are useful has not been fully elucidated. Data from both the neo-adjuvant and advanced disease settings suggest that response to aromatase inhibitors does not appear to be adversely affected by HER-2 overexpression. Within neo-adjuvant aromatase inhibitor studies, the proliferation marker Ki67 has shown a significant correlation with relapse-free survival, suggesting a role in prediction for measurement of Ki67 and other dynamic markers of response. Analysis of multiple gene expression changes over a short treatment period may also have potential clinical utility for prediction of response.