Common Themes of Antibody Maturation to Simian Immunodeficiency Virus, Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infections

Characterization of virus-specific immune responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) is important to understanding the early virus-host interactions that may determine the course of virus infection and disease. Using a comprehensive panel of serological assays, we have previously demonstrated a complex and lengthy maturation of virus-specific antibody responses elicited by attenuated strains of SIV that was closely associated with the development of protective immunity. In the present study, we expand these analyses to address several questions regarding the nature of the virus-specific antibody responses to pathogenic SIV, SIV/HIV-1 (SHIV), and HIV-1 infections. The results demonstrate for the first time a common theme of antibody maturation to SIV, SHIV, and HIV-1 infections that is characterized by ongoing changes in antibody titer, conformational dependence, and antibody avidity during the first 6 to 10 months following virus infection. We demonstrate that this gradual evolution of virus-specific antibody responses is independent of the levels of virus replication and the pathogenicity of the infection viral strain. While the serological assays used in these studies were useful in discriminating between protective and nonprotective antibody responses during evaluation of vaccine efficacy with attenuated SIV, these same assays do not distinguish the clinical outcome of infection in pathogenic SIV, SHIV, or HIV-1 infections. These results likely reflect differences in the immune mechanisms involved in mediating protection from virus challenge compared to those that control an established viral infection, and they suggest that additional characteristics of both humoral and cellular responses evolve during this early immune maturation.     

Targeted Isolation of Antibodies Directed against Major Sites of SIV Env Vulnerability

The simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) challenge model of lentiviral infection is often used as a model to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) for studying vaccine mediated and immune correlates of protection. However, knowledge of the structure of the SIV envelope (Env) glycoprotein is limited, as is knowledge of binding specificity, function and potential efficacy of SIV antibody responses. In this study we describe the use of a competitive probe binding sort strategy as well as scaffolded probes for targeted isolation of SIV Env-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). We isolated nearly 70 SIV-specific mAbs directed against major sites of SIV Env vulnerability analogous to broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) targets of HIV-1, namely, the CD4 binding site (CD4bs), CD4-induced (CD4i)-site, peptide epitopes in variable loops 1, 2 and 3 (V1, V2, V3) and potentially glycan targets of SIV Env. The range of SIV mAbs isolated includes those exhibiting varying degrees of neutralization breadth and potency as well as others that demonstrated binding but not neutralization. Several SIV mAbs displayed broad and potent neutralization of a diverse panel of 20 SIV viral isolates with some also neutralizing HIV-2_7312A. This extensive panel of SIV mAbs will facilitate more effective use of the SIV non-human primate (NHP) model for understanding the variables in development of a HIV vaccine or immunotherapy.     

Intracellular Interaction of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Gag and Env Proteins

In polarized epithelial cells, the assembly and release of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) occur at the basolateral side of the plasma membrane, and the site of assembly is determined by the site of expression of the Env protein. In order to investigate whether the expression of the Env proteins exclusively in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) can alter the site of virus assembly, we coexpressed the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Gag protein and mutant SIV Env proteins having an ER retrieval signal (KKXX motif). In cells expressing the wild-type (wt) Env protein or coexpressing Env and Gag proteins, the Env protein was processed into the surface (SU) and transmembrane (TM) proteins. In contrast, in cells expressing the mutant Env proteins alone or in combination with Gag, the Env proteins were retrieved to the ER and were not proteolytically processed. Coexpression of the Gag and ER-retained mutant Env proteins resulted in a transient decrease in the release of the Gag protein into the medium, suggesting an interaction between the Gag and ER-retrieved Env proteins. Using saponin-permeabilized cells coexpressing Gag and Env proteins, we obtained further evidence for Env-Gag interaction. A monoclonal antibody specific to the SIV Gag protein was found to coimmunoprecipitate both the Gag and Env proteins. The interaction was specific, as coexpressed SIV Env proteins without the cytoplasmic tail or a chimeric HIV-1 Env proteins with the CD4 cytoplasmic tail were not coimmunoprecipitated by the Gag-specific antibody. Electron microscopic analyses indicated that assembly of virus particles occurred only at the surfaces of cells in which the Gag protein was coexpressed with either the wt or ER-retrieved mutant Env protein. These data indicate that although the Env and Gag proteins interact intracellularly, the site of assembly of SIV is not redirected to an intracellular organelle by the retrieval of the Env protein to the ER.     

Distinct Evolutionary Pressures Underlie Diversity in Simian Immunodeficiency Virus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Lineages

Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection of rhesus macaques causes immune depletion and disease closely resembling human AIDS and is well recognized as the most relevant animal model for the human disease. Experimental investigations of viral pathogenesis and vaccine protection primarily involve a limited set of related viruses originating in sooty mangabeys (SIVsmm). The diversity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) has evolved in humans in about a century; in contrast, SIV isolates used in the macaque model evolved in sooty mangabeys over millennia. To investigate the possible consequences of such different evolutionary histories for selection pressures and observed diversity in SIVsmm and HIV-1, we isolated, sequenced, and analyzed 20 independent isolates of SIVsmm, including representatives of 7 distinct clades of viruses isolated from natural infection. We found SIVsmm diversity to be lower overall than HIV-1 M group diversity. Reduced positive selection (i.e., less diversifying evolution) was evident in extended regions of SIVsmm proteins, most notably in Gag p27 and Env gp120. In addition, the relative diversities of proteins in the two lineages were distinct: SIVsmm Env and Gag were much less diverse than their HIV-1 counterparts. This may be explained by lower SIV-directed immune activity in mangabeys relative to HIV-1-directed immunity in humans. These findings add an additional layer of complexity to the interpretation and, potentially, to the predictive utility of the SIV/macaque model, and they highlight the unique features of human and simian lentiviral evolution that inform studies of pathogenesis and strategies for AIDS vaccine design.     

Gag-Specific Cellular Immunity Determines In Vitro Viral Inhibition and In Vivo Virologic Control following Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Challenges of Vaccinated Rhesus Monkeys

A comprehensive vaccine for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) would block HIV-1 acquisition as well as durably control viral replication in breakthrough infections. Recent studies have demonstrated that Env is required for a vaccine to protect against acquisition of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) in vaccinated rhesus monkeys, but the antigen requirements for virologic control remain unclear. Here, we investigate whether CD8(+) T lymphocytes from vaccinated rhesus monkeys mediate viral inhibition in vitro and whether these responses predict virologic control following SIV challenge. We observed that CD8(+) lymphocytes from 23 vaccinated rhesus monkeys inhibited replication of SIV in vitro. Moreover, the magnitude of inhibition prior to challenge was inversely correlated with set point SIV plasma viral loads after challenge. In addition, CD8 cell-mediated viral inhibition in vaccinated rhesus monkeys correlated significantly with Gag-specific, but not Pol- or Env-specific, CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocyte responses. These findings demonstrate that in vitro viral inhibition following vaccination largely reflects Gag-specific cellular immune responses and correlates with in vivo virologic control following infection. These data suggest the importance of including Gag in an HIV-1 vaccine in which virologic control is desired.     

A Twin-Cysteine Motif in the V2 Region of gp120 Is Associated with SIV Envelope Trimer Stabilization

The V1 and V2 variable regions of the primate immunodeficiency viruses contribute to the trimer association domain of the gp120 exterior envelope glycoprotein. A pair of V2 cysteine residues at 183 and 191 (“twin cysteines”) is present in several simian immunodeficiency viruses, human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) and some SIV_cpz lineages, but not in HIV-1. To examine the role of this potentially disulfide-bonded twin-cysteine motif, the cysteine residues in the SIVmac239 envelope glycoproteins were individually and pairwise substituted by alanine residues. All of the twin-cysteine mutants exhibited decreases in gp120 association with the Env trimer, membrane-fusing activity, and ability to support virus entry. Thus, the twin-cysteine motif plays a role in Env trimer stabilization in SIV and may do so in HIV-2 and some SIV_cpz as well. This implies that HIV-1 lost the twin-cysteines, and may have relatively unstable Env trimers compared to SIV and HIV-2.     

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 (HIV-2)/HIV-1 Envelope Chimeras Detect High Titers of Broadly Reactive HIV-1 V3-Specific Antibodies in Human Plasma

Deciphering antibody specificities that constrain human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope (Env) diversity, limit virus replication, and contribute to neutralization breadth and potency is an important goal of current HIV/AIDS vaccine research. Transplantation of discrete HIV-1 neutralizing epitopes into HIV-2 scaffolds may provide a sensitive, biologically functional context by which to quantify specific antibody reactivities even in complex sera. Here, we describe a novel HIV-2 proviral scaffold (pHIV-2_KR.X7) into which we substituted the complete variable region 3 (V3) of the env gene of HIV-1_YU2 or HIV-1_Ccon to yield the chimeric proviruses pHIV-2_KR.X7 YU2 V3 and pHIV-2_KR.X7 Ccon V3. These HIV-2/HIV-1 chimeras were replication competent and sensitive to selective pharmacological inhibitors of virus entry. V3 chimeric viruses were resistant to neutralization by HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies directed against the CD4 binding site, coreceptor binding site, and gp41 membrane proximal external region but exhibited striking sensitivity to HIV-1 V3-specific monoclonal antibodies, 447-52D and F425 B4e8 (50% inhibitory concentration of [IC₅₀] <0.005 μg/ml for each). Plasma specimens from 11 HIV-1 clade B- and 10 HIV-1 clade C-infected subjects showed no neutralizing activity against HIV-2 but exhibited high-titer V3-specific neutralization against both HIV-2/HIV-1 V3 chimeras with IC₅₀ measurements ranging from 1:50 to greater than 1:40,000. Neutralization titers of B clade plasmas were as much as 1,000-fold lower when tested against the primary HIV-1_YU2 virus than with the HIV-2_KR.X7 YU2 V3 chimera, demonstrating highly effective shielding of V3 epitopes in the native Env trimer. This finding was replicated using a second primary HIV-1 strain (HIV-1_BORI) and the corresponding HIV-2_KR.X7 BORI V3 chimera. We conclude that V3 is highly immunogenic in vivo, eliciting antibodies with substantial breadth of reactivity and neutralizing potential. These antibodies constrain HIV-1 Env to a structure(s) in which V3 epitopes are concealed prior to CD4 engagement but do not otherwise contribute to neutralization breadth and potency against most primary virus strains. Triggering of the viral spike to reveal V3 epitopes may be required if V3 immunogens are to be components of an effective HIV-1 vaccine.     

CD40L-Adjuvanted DNA/Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) Vaccine Enhances Protection against Neutralization-Resistant Mucosal SIV Infection

Here, we show that a CD40L-adjuvanted DNA/modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) vaccine enhances protection against a pathogenic neutralization-resistant mucosal SIV infection, improves long-term viral control, and prevents AIDS. Analyses of serum IgG antibodies to linear peptides of SIV Env revealed a strong response to V2, with targeting of fewer epitopes in the immunodominant region of gp41 (gp41-ID) and the V1 region as a correlate for enhanced protection. Greater expansion of antiviral CD8 T cells in the gut correlated with long-term viral control.     

Critical Amino Acids within the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein V4 N- and C-Terminals Contribute to Virus Entry

The importance of the fourth variable (V4) region of the human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein (Env) in virus infection has not been well clarified, though the polymorphism of this region has been found to be associated with disease progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). In the present work, we focused on the correlation between HIV-1 gp120 V4 region polymorphism and the function of the region on virus entry, and the possible mechanisms for how the V4 region contributes to virus infectivity. Therefore, we analyzed the differences in V4 sequences along with coreceptor usage preference from CCR5 to CXCR4 and examined the importance of the amino acids within the V4 region for CCR5- and CXCR4-tropic virus entry. In addition, we determined the influence of the V4 amino acids on Env expression and gp160 processing intracellularly, as well as the amount of Env on the pseudovirus surface. The results indicated that V4 tended to have a shorter length, fewer potential N-linked glycosylation sites (PNGS), greater evolutionary distance, and a lower negative net charge when HIV-1 isolates switched from a coreceptor usage preference for CCR5 to CXCR4. The N- and C-terminals of the HIV-1 V4 region are highly conserved and critical to maintain virus entry ability, but only the mutation at position 417 in the context of ADA (a R5-tropic HIV-1 strain) resulted in the ability to utilize CXCR4. In addition, 390L, 391F, 414I, and 416L are critical to maintain gp160 processing and maturation. It is likely that the hydrophobic properties and the electrostatic surface potential of gp120, rather than the conformational structure, greatly contribute to this V4 functionality. The findings provide information to aid in the understanding of the functions of V4 in HIV-1 entry and offer a potential target to aid in the development of entry inhibitors.     

Variable Constraints on the Principal Immunodominant Domain of the Transmembrane Glycoprotein of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

Lentiviruses have in their transmembrane glycoprotein (TM) a highly immunogenic structure referred to as the principal immunodominant domain (PID). The PID forms a loop of 5 to 7 amino acids between two conserved cysteines. Previous studies showed that envelope (Env) glycoprotein functions of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) could be retained after extensive mutation of the PID loop sequence, in spite of its high conservation. In order to compare Env function in different lentiviruses, either random mutations were introduced in the PID loop sequence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) or the entire HIV-1 PID loop was replaced by the corresponding PID loop of FIV or simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). In the macrophage-tropic HIV-1 ADA Env, mutations impaired the processing of the gp160 Env precursor, thereby abolishing viral infectivity. However, 6 of the 108 random Env mutants that were screened retained the capacity to induce cell membrane fusion. The SIV and FIV sequences and five random mutations were then introduced in the context of T-cell-line-adapted HIV-1 LAI which, although phenotypically distant from HIV-1 ADA, has an identical PID loop sequence. In contrast to the situation for HIV-1 ADA mutants, the cleavage of the Env precursor was unaffected in most HIV-1 LAI mutants. Such mutations, however, resulted in increased shedding of the gp120 surface glycoprotein (SU) from the gp41 TM. The HIV-1 LAI Env mutants showed high fusogenic efficiency. Three Env mutants retained the capacity to mediate virus entry in target cells, although less efficiently than the wild-type Env, and allowed the reconstitution of infectious molecular clones. These results indicated that in HIV-1, like FIV, the conserved PID sequence can be changed without impairing Env function. However, functional constraints on the PID of HIV-1 vary depending on the structural context of Env, presumably in relation to the role of the PID in the interaction of the SU and TM subunits and the stability of the Env complex.     

Analysis of Neutralization Specificities in Polyclonal Sera Derived from Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Individuals

During human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, patients develop various levels of neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses. In some cases, patient sera can potently neutralize diverse strains of HIV-1, but the antibody specificities that mediate this broad neutralization are not known, and their elucidation remains a formidable challenge. Due to variable and nonneutralizing determinants on the exterior envelope glycoprotein (Env), nonnative Env protein released from cells, and the glycan shielding that assembles in the context of the quaternary structure of the functional spike, HIV-1 Env elicits a myriad of binding antibodies. However, few of these antibodies can neutralize circulating viruses. We present a systematic analysis of the NAb specificities of a panel of HIV-1-positive sera, using methodologies that identify both conformational and continuous neutralization determinants on the HIV-1 Env protein. Characterization of sera included selective adsorption with native gp120 and specific point mutant variants, chimeric virus analysis, and peptide inhibition of viral neutralization. The gp120 protein was the major neutralizing determinant for most sera, although not all neutralization activity against all viruses could be identified. In some broadly neutralizing sera, the gp120-directed neutralization mapped to the CD4 binding region of gp120. In addition, we found evidence that regions of the gp120 coreceptor binding site may also be a target of neutralizing activity. Sera displaying limited neutralization breadth were mapped to the immunogenic V3 region of gp120. In a subset of sera, we also identified NAbs directed against the conserved, membrane-proximal external region of gp41. These data allow a more detailed understanding of the humoral responses to the HIV-1 Env protein and provide insights regarding the most relevant targets for HIV-1 vaccine design.     

Envelope Vaccination Shapes Viral Envelope Evolution following Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Rhesus Monkeys

The evolution of envelope mutations by replicating primate immunodeficiency viruses allows these viruses to escape from the immune pressure mediated by neutralizing antibodies. Vaccine-induced anti-envelope antibody responses may accelerate and/or alter the specificity of the antibodies, thus shaping the evolution of envelope mutations in the replicating virus. To explore this possibility, we studied the neutralizing antibody response and the envelope sequences in rhesus monkeys vaccinated with either gag-pol-nef immunogens or gag-pol-nef immunogens in combination with env and then infected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). Using a pseudovirion neutralization assay, we demonstrate that envelope vaccination primed for an accelerated neutralizing antibody response following virus challenge. To monitor viral envelope evolution in these two cohorts of monkeys, full-length envelopes from plasma virus isolated at weeks 37 and 62 postchallenge were sequenced by single genome amplification to identify sites of envelope mutations. We show that env vaccination was associated with a change in the pattern of envelope mutations. Prevalent mutations in sequences from gag-pol-nef vaccinees included deletions in both variable regions 1 and 4 (V1 and V4), whereas deletions in the env vaccinees occurred only in V1. These data show that env vaccination altered the focus of the antibody-mediated selection pressure on the evolution of envelope following SIV challenge.Immune containment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) is complicated by the continuous genetic evolution of the virus. The evolution of the HIV-1 envelope is shaped, in part, by selective pressure of neutralizing antibodies (6, 12, 27, 34-36, 40). Changes in envelope sequence and glycosylation patterns following infection can allow the virus to escape neutralization. If the rate and extent of envelope sequence evolution following infection can be decreased, immune containment of HIV-1 may be improved.One possible strategy for modifying envelope evolution is vaccination prior to infection. A vaccine-elicited memory immune response could focus and potentiate the humoral immune response that develops following infection. The possible consequence of vaccination has not been assessed, however, because of the limited number of human volunteers who have received highly immunogenic envelope immunogens and subsequently became infected with HIV-1.Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection of rhesus monkeys provides a powerful model to study the effect of vaccination on envelope evolution. Like HIV-1, SIV employs both the CD4 molecule and the chemokine receptor CCR5 to enter a target cell and cause an AIDS-like disease in macaques (16, 22). Both SIV and HIV-1 envelopes are heavily glycosylated, with approximately 50% of their mass derived from carbohydrates (14, 21). SIV and HIV-1 envelopes share approximately 40% amino acid homology (10, 11) and have overlapping variable and constant regions, although the variable region 3 (V3) of HIV-1 envelope does not align with the homologous region of SIV envelope (7). Following SIV infection in rhesus monkeys, SIV envelope evolves most rapidly in variable regions 1 and 4 (V1 and V4, respectively), leading to nucleotide additions, deletions, and/or mutations that can potentially translate to changes in glycosylation (7, 9, 13, 15, 19, 29, 30).Studies done to characterize SIV neutralization suggest that it occurs through mechanisms similar to those seen in HIV-1 neutralization. Amino acid mutations in the envelope of both viruses contribute to the evasion of antibody binding directly by changing recognition sequences and/or envelope conformation. In addition, the glycosylation of envelope serves as a further obstacle to antibody recognition (20, 33, 40). Considerable effort has been devoted to defining neutralizing epitopes of the HIV and SIV envelopes. The known neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies elicited during natural infection are directed against HIV-1 envelope target sites on both gp120 and gp41, including the V3 region, the CD4 binding site, oligomannose residues of gp120, and gp41 (17, 31). The neutralizing epitope profile of SIV envelope includes the CD4 binding site and gp41 but not the V3 region. There is conflicting evidence as to whether V1, V2, and/or V4 of SIV are targets for antibody neutralization (15, 18, 19). The present study addresses whether vaccine-induced immune responses accelerate the generation of autologous neutralizing antibodies following SIV challenge in rhesus monkeys and how this humoral immune response can potentially shape viral sequence evolution.     

Proteolytic Processing of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Envelope Glycoprotein Precursor Decreases Conformational Flexibility

The mature envelope glycoprotein (Env) spike on the surface of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) virions is derived by proteolytic cleavage of a trimeric gp160 glycoprotein precursor. Remarkably, proteolytic processing of the HIV-1 Env precursor results in changes in Env antigenicity that resemble those associated with glutaraldehyde fixation. Apparently, proteolytic processing of the HIV-1 Env precursor decreases conformational flexibility of the Env trimeric complex, differentially affecting the integrity/accessibility of epitopes for neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies.     

Studies of the Neutralizing Activity and Avidity of Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Env Antibody Elicited by DNA Priming and Protein Boosting

DNA vaccination is an effective means of eliciting strong antibody responses to a number of viral antigens. However, DNA immunization alone has not generated persistent, high-titer antibody and neutralizing antibody responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein (Env). We have previously reported that DNA-primed anti-Env antibody responses can be augmented by boosting with Env-expressing recombinant vaccinia viruses. We report here that recombinant Env protein provides a more effective boost of DNA-initiated antibody responses. In rabbits primed with Env-expressing plasmids, protein boosting increased titer, persistence, neutralizing activity, and avidity of anti-Env responses. While titers increased rapidly after boosting, avidity and neutralizing activity matured more slowly over a 6-month period following protein boosting. DNA priming and protein immunization with HIV-1 HXB-2 Env elicited neutralizing antibody for T cell line-adapted, but not primary isolate, viruses. The most effective neutralizing antibody responses were observed after priming with plasmids which expressed noninfectious virus-like particles. In contrast to immunizations with HIV-1 Env, DNA immunizations with the influenza virus hemagglutinin glycoprotein did not require a protein boost to achieve high-titer antibody with good avidity and persistence.     

Introduction of Exogenous Epitopes in the Variable Regions of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein: Effect on Viral Infectivity and the Neutralization Phenotype

In this study we examined whether human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is equally susceptible to neutralization by a given antibody when the epitope of this antibody is introduced at different positions within the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env). To this end, we introduced two exogenous “epitope tags” at different locations within three major Env regions in two distinct HIV-1 isolates. We examined how the introduction of the exogenous epitopes affects Env expression, Env incorporation into virions, Env fusogenic potential, and viral susceptibility to neutralization. Our data indicate that even within the same Env region, the exact positioning of the epitope impacts the susceptibility of the virus to neutralization by the antibody that binds to that epitope. Our data also indicate that even if the same epitope is introduced in the exact same position on two different Envs, its exposure and, as a result, the neutralization susceptibility of the virus, can be very different. In contrast to the findings of previous studies conducted with HIV-1 isolates other than those used here, but in agreement with results obtained with simian immunodeficiency virus, we observed that tagging of the fourth variable region of Env (V4) did not result in neutralization by the anti-tag antibodies. Our data indicate that epitopes in V4 are not properly exposed within the functional HIV-1 trimeric Env spike, suggesting that V4 may not be a good target for vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies.The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein (Env) is expressed as a heavily glycosylated peptide of approximately 160 kDa (gp160), which is cleaved intracellularly into two noncovalently associated subunits: an extracellular subunit (gp120), responsible for CD4 and coreceptor (primarily CCR5 and/or CXCR4) binding, and a transmembrane subunit (gp41) that mediates fusion between viral and host cell membranes. Based on amino acid sequence homology analysis of gp120s derived from diverse HIV-1 isolates, gp120 is divided into five “constant” regions (C1 to C5) and five “variable” regions (also called “loops,” because most of them have cysteines in the N and C termini that form disulfide bonds). Despite their extensive amino acid variability, the variable loops of gp120 play central roles during the entry of the virus into the cell, for instance, by directly or indirectly modulating the interaction of Env with coreceptor molecules on the target surfaces during virus-cell fusion. They also offer protection from neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) by various mechanisms. The variable loops themselves are targets of NAbs, and during infection, the replicating virus accumulates mutations in the variable regions that allow it to escape the action of anti-variable loop-directed NAbs, while at the same time the variable loops are positioned within the Env trimer so that they prevent, or minimize, the binding of NAbs to more-conserved epitopes, such as the receptor and coreceptor binding sites (4, 5, 12, 15, 20, 23, 25, 27, 31).HIV-1 strains display distinct neutralization phenotypes. Some isolates, such as SF162, are generally susceptible to NAbs that bind to many distinct regions of Env, including the variable regions, while other isolates, such as YU2 or JRFL, are generally resistant to neutralization by the same NAbs (1). It has been proposed that irrespective of the overall neutralizing phenotype of HIV-1 isolates, the binding of only a single antibody per Env trimer on the virion surface can lead to neutralization, when all Env trimers present on the virion surface are bound by at least one antibody (32). This important observation also implies that the epitope specificity of an antibody may not be as important for neutralization as its ability to bind to its target within the trimeric Env structure. In fact, antibodies to diverse regions of Env, such as V1, V2, V3, and the receptor and coreceptor binding sites, can all neutralize HIV-1 (1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 18, 20, 23, 25, 27, 29, 30).In many cases, a given isolate will not be equally susceptible to neutralization by NAbs that bind to different Env regions, for example, the V3 loop and the CD4-binding site (CD4-BS). Whether differences in the neutralizing potentials of two antibodies that bind to distinct epitopes on HIV-1 Env are due to differences in the binding affinities of the two antibodies or whether they occur because the viruses are intrinsically more susceptible to NAbs that bind certain epitopes and not others (i.e., the relative importance of the various regions of Env in Env function and virus neutralization sensitivity differs) is not yet fully understood. One way to address these issues is to introduce small non-HIV Env amino acid sequences (tags) that are targets of known monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) at various positions within the viral Env and to examine how the placement of the same epitope at different positions within Env affects the neutralization phenotype of the virus.Foreign epitopes have been introduced into the variable regions of HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Envs, and their effects on viral neutralization potential have been examined (14, 19, 22, 33). Yang and colleagues (33) introduced the FLAG epitope into the V4 regions of three HIV-1 isolates (YU2, JRFL, and HxB2) displaying distinct neutralization phenotypes in response to anti-HIV NAbs; they found that all three pseudotyped viruses were equivalently neutralized by an anti-FLAG MAb. One important implication of that study is that neutralization-resistant isolates, such as YU2 or JRFL, are not intrinsically more resistant to neutralization than more-susceptible isolates, such as HxB2, so long as the antibody binds to its epitope on the functional virion-associated Env spike. A second implication is that since the FLAG epitope was exposed in the V4 loops of all three isolates, the V4 loop could theoretically be a good target for vaccine-elicited antibodies. In contrast, Pantophlet et al. (19) introduced the HA tag into various regions of the JRCSF (neutralization-resistant) and HxB2 (neutralization-sensitive) isolates and reported that JRCSF was intrinsically more resistant than HxB2 to anti-HA antibodies. This observation implies, therefore, that some HIV-1 strains (primary, neutralization-resistant strains) have developed mechanisms that limit the accessibility of multiple Env regions, including variable regions, to antibodies developed during infection. Laird and Desrosiers (14) introduced the FLAG epitope into two positions within each of the V1, V2, and V4 loops of SIV239 and SIV316. They reported that the functionality of Env was differentially affected by the precise location of the exogenous tag sequence within the variable loops examined. Importantly, and in contrast to what was reported for the HIV-1 isolates mentioned above, the SIV239 variants containing a V4 FLAG epitope were not neutralized by an anti-FLAG MAb. It appeared, however, that the FLAG epitope was not well exposed on the trimeric Env when introduced into the V4 loop of SIV but was exposed when introduced into the V1 loop of the same virus. Potentially, this means that the V4 loop is differentially exposed in the context of the HIV-1 and SIV Envs.The FLAG epitope (DYKDDDDK) is highly charged. Therefore, it is possible that the effect on Env function and epitope exposure could differ if a different exogenous epitope were inserted instead of FLAG. Here we examined the effect of variable loop tagging on the Env functions and viral neutralization phenotypes of two primary HIV-1 clade B isolates, SF162 (CCR5 tropic) and SF33 (CXCR4 tropic), using two exogenous epitopes (FLAG and hemagglutinin [HA] tags) positioned at multiple locations within the V1, V2, and V4 loops. By placing the same tag in several regions within each loop, we investigated the accessibilities of various parts of the same loop to a given NAb. By using two tags that differ significantly in amino acid composition (FLAG tag, DYKDDDDK; HA tag, YPYDVPDYA), we aimed at distinguishing between the effects of amino acid composition and the positioning of the tag on Env function and overall epitope exposure. Finally, identical evaluations of R5 and X4 Envs may provide information about the relative roles played in neutralization by variable loops in Envs displaying distinct coreceptor usage. We report that both the amino acid sequence and the position of the tag within and among the variable loops greatly affected the functionality of Env. In contrast to previous observations made with other HIV-1 Envs (33) but in agreement with what was reported for the SIV239 Env (14), we observed that tagging of the V4 loops of SF162 and SF33 did not render these isolates susceptible to neutralization by the corresponding anti-tag MAbs.     

Promoting trimerization of soluble human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Env through the use of HIV-1/simian immunodeficiency virus chimeras

The envelope proteins (Env) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) form homo-oligomers in the endoplasmic reticulum. The oligomeric structure of Env is maintained, but is less stable, after cleavage in a Golgi compartment and transport to the surface of infected cells. Functional, virion-associated HIV-1 and SIV Env have an almost exclusively trimeric structure. In addition, a soluble form of SIV Env (gp140) forms a nearly homogeneous population of trimers. Here, we describe the oligomeric structure of soluble, uncleaved HIV-1 gp140 and modifications that promote a stable trimeric structure. Biochemical and biophysical analyses, including sedimentation equilibrium and scanning transmission electron microscopy, revealed that unmodified HIV-1 gp140 purified as a heterogeneous range of oligomeric species, including dimers and aggregates. Deletion of the V2 domain alone or, especially, both the V1 and V2 domains reduced dimer formation but promoted aggregation rather than trimerization. Expressing gp140 with mannose-only oligosaccharides did not eliminate heterogeneity. Replacement of the entire gp41 segment of HIV-1 gp140 or just the N-terminal half (85 amino acids) of this segment with the corresponding region of SIV was sufficient to confer efficient trimerization for gp140 derived from clade B and C isolates. Importantly, the relatively small segment of the HIV Env replaced by SIV sequences contains no known targets of neutralizing antibody. The soluble trimeric form of HIV-1 Env should prove useful for assessment of antigenic structure and immunogenicity.     

Multiclade human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope immunogens elicit broad cellular and humoral immunity in rhesus monkeys

The development of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine that elicits potent cellular and humoral immune responses recognizing divergent strains of HIV-1 will be critical for combating the global AIDS epidemic. The present studies were initiated to examine the magnitude and breadth of envelope (Env)-specific T-lymphocyte and antibody responses generated by vaccines containing either a single or multiple genetically distant HIV-1 Env immunogens. Rhesus monkeys were immunized with DNA prime-recombinant adenovirus boost vaccines encoding a Gag-Pol-Nef polyprotein in combination with either a single Env or a mixture of clade-A, clade-B, and clade-C Envs. Monkeys receiving the multiclade Env immunization developed robust immune responses to all vaccine antigens and, importantly, a greater breadth of Env recognition than monkeys immunized with vaccines including a single Env immunogen. All groups of vaccinated monkeys demonstrated equivalent immune protection following challenge with the pathogenic simian-human immunodeficiency virus 89.6P. These data suggest that a multicomponent vaccine encoding Env proteins from multiple clades of HIV-1 can generate broad Env-specific T-lymphocyte and antibody responses without antigenic interference. This study demonstrates that it is possible to generate protective immune responses by vaccination with genetically diverse isolates of HIV-1.     

Lack of B Cell Dysfunction Is Associated with Functional,gp120-Dominant Antibody Responses in Breast Milk of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected African Green Monkeys

The design of an effective vaccine to reduce the incidence of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) via breastfeeding will require identification of protective immune responses that block postnatal virus acquisition. Natural hosts of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) sustain nonpathogenic infection and rarely transmit the virus to their infants despite high milk virus RNA loads. This is in contrast to HIV-infected women and SIV-infected rhesus macaques (RhMs), nonnatural hosts which exhibit higher rates of postnatal virus transmission. In this study, we compared the systemic and mucosal B cell responses of lactating, SIV-infected African green monkeys (AGMs), a natural host species, to that of SIV-infected RhMs and HIV-infected women. AGMs did not demonstrate hypergammaglobulinemia or accumulate circulating memory B cells during chronic SIV infection. Moreover, the milk of SIV-infected AGMs contained higher proportions of naive B cells than RhMs. Interestingly, AGMs exhibited robust milk and plasma Env binding antibody responses that were one to two logs higher than those in RhMs and humans and demonstrated autologous neutralizing responses in milk at 1 year postinfection. Furthermore, the plasma and milk Env gp120-binding antibody responses were equivalent to or predominant over Env gp140-binding antibody responses in AGMs, in contrast to that in RhMs and humans. The strong gp120-specific, functional antibody responses in the milk of SIV-infected AGMs may contribute to the rarity of postnatal transmission observed in natural SIV hosts.     

Protection of rhesus monkeys against infection with minimally pathogenic simian-human immunodeficiency virus: correlations with neutralizing antibodies and cytotoxic T cells

We studied the capacity of active immunization of rhesus monkeys with HIV-1 envelope protein (Env) to induce primary virus cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies to prevent infection following intravenous challenge with simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV). Monkeys were immunized with the human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV-1) strain R2 Env. Initially, the Env was expressed in vivo by an alphavirus replicon particle system, and then it was administered as soluble oligomeric gp140. Concurrently, groups of monkeys received expression vectors that encoded either simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) gag/pol genes or no SIV genes in vivo to test the additional protective benefit of concurrent induction of virus-specific cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses. Groups of control monkeys received either the gag/pol regimen or sham immunizations. The antibodies induced by the Env immunization regimen neutralized diverse primary HIV-1 strains. Similarly, potent CMI responses were induced by the gag/pol regimen, as measured by gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunospot assays. Differences in the responses among groups of monkeys strongly suggested that there was interference between the Env and gag/pol immunization regimens. Complete protection of some of the monkeys against infection after intravenous challenge with the partially pathogenic SHIV(DH12R (Clone 7)) was associated independently with both neutralizing antibody and CMI responses. Protection was associated with SHIV(DH12 (Clone 7)) serum neutralizing antibody titers of > or =1:80 or with cellular immune responses corresponding to >2,000 spot forming cells per 10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Immunization was also associated with a reduction in the magnitude and duration of virus load. Induction of cross-reactive, primary HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies is feasible and, when potent, may result in complete protection against infection with a heterologous challenge virus strain.     

Gene-based vaccination with a mismatched envelope protects against simian immunodeficiency virus infection in nonhuman primates

The RV144 trial demonstrated that an experimental AIDS vaccine can prevent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in humans. Because of its limited efficacy, further understanding of the mechanisms of preventive AIDS vaccines remains a priority, and nonhuman primate (NHP) models of lentiviral infection provide an opportunity to define immunogens, vectors, and correlates of immunity. In this study, we show that prime-boost vaccination with a mismatched SIV envelope (Env) gene, derived from simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239, prevents infection by SIVsmE660 intrarectally. Analysis of different gene-based prime-boost immunization regimens revealed that recombinant adenovirus type 5 (rAd5) prime followed by replication-defective lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (rLCMV) boost elicited robust CD4 and CD8 T-cell and humoral immune responses. This vaccine protected against infection after repetitive mucosal challenge with efficacies of 82% per exposure and 62% cumulatively. No effect was seen on viremia in infected vaccinated monkeys compared to controls. Protection correlated with the presence of neutralizing antibodies to the challenge viruses tested in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. These data indicate that a vaccine expressing a mismatched Env gene alone can prevent SIV infection in NHPs and identifies an immune correlate that may guide immunogen selection and immune monitoring for clinical efficacy trials.