Five- and six-coordinate ruthenium(II) porphyrin tetiaryphosphine complexes,and their reactions with dioxygen via inner- and outer-sphere mechanisms

The 5-coordinate ruthenium(II) octaethylporphyrin complex Ru(OEP)(PPh₃) has been prepared by reduction of Ru(OEP)(PPh₃)Br using zinc amalgam. Both the Ru(OEP)(PPh₃)₃ complexes (n = 1,2) undergo reaction in toluene with O₂ to generate OPPh₃, RuO₂, and the parent porphyrin H₂(OEP); trace water and the μ-oxo dimer [Ru(OEP)(OH)]₂O are implicated in the oxidation reaction, which is considered to be initiated by coordination of O₂ to Ru(OEP)(PPh₃). In contrast, a catalytic O₂-oxidation of excess PPh₃ to the oxide probably goes via an initial outer-sphere reaction with Ru(OEP)(PPh₃)₂, that generates superoxides and Ru(III), both detectable by ESR; the superoxide is believed to be stabilized via portion addition as HO₂· that subsequently disproportionates to O₂ and H₂O₂. PPh₃ is oxidized by the peroxide, and during a reduction step that regenerates the Ru(II) catalyst from Ru(III).     

Photo-induced oxidation of a dinuclear Mn(2)(II,II) complex to the Mn(2)(III,IV) state by inter- and intramolecular electron transfer to Ru(III)tris-bipyridine

To model the structural and functional parts of the water oxidizing complex in Photosystem II, a dimeric manganese(II,II) complex (1) was linked to a ruthenium(II)tris-bipyridine (Ru(II)(bpy)(3)) complex via a substituted L-tyrosine, to form the trinuclear complex 2 [J. Inorg. Biochem. 78 (2000) 15]. Flash photolysis of 1 and Ru(II)(bpy)(3) in aqueous solution, in the presence of an electron acceptor, resulted in the stepwise extraction of three electrons by Ru(III)(bpy)(3) from the Mn(2)(II,II) dimer, which then attained the Mn(2)(III,IV) oxidation state. In a similar experiment with compound 2, the dinuclear Mn complex reduced the photo-oxidized Ru moiety via intramolecular electron transfer on each photochemical event. From EPR it was seen that 2 also reached the Mn(2)(III,IV) state. Our data indicate that oxidation from the Mn(2)(II,II) state proceeds stepwise via intermediate formation of Mn(2)(II,III) and Mn(2)(III,III). In the presence of water, cyclic voltammetry showed an additional anodic peak beyond Mn(2)(II,III/III,III) oxidation which was significantly lower than in neat acetonitrile. Assuming that this peak is due to oxidation to Mn(2)(III,IV), this suggests that water is essential for the formation of the Mn(2)(III,IV) oxidation state. Compound 2 is a structural mimic of the water oxidizing complex, in that it links a Mn complex via a tyrosine to a highly oxidizing photosensitizer. Complex 2 also mimics mechanistic aspects of Photosystem II, in that the electron transfer to the photosensitizer is fast and results in several electron extractions from the Mn moiety.     

The light switch effect upon the association of [Ru(1,10-phenanthroline)2dipyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c]phenazine]2+ with single stranded poly(dA) and poly(dT)

Large enhancement in the luminescence intensity of the Delta- and Lambda-Ru(phenanthroline)(2)dipyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c]phenazine](2+) ([Ru(phen)(2)DPPZ](2+)) complexes upon their association with single stranded poly(dA) and poly(dT) is reported in this work. As the mixing ratio ([[Ru(phen)(2)DPPZ](2+)]/[DNA base]) increases, the luminescence intensity increase in a sigmoidal manner, indicating that the enhancement involves some cooperativity. At a high mixing ratio, the luminescence properties are affected by the nature of the DNA bases and not by the absolute configuration of the [Ru(phen)(2)DPPZ](2+) complex, indicating that the single stranded poly(dA) and poly(dT) do not recognize the configuration of the metal complex. In the case of the Lambda-[Ru(phen)(2)DPPZ](2+)-poly(dT) complex, the manner of the enhancement is somewhat different from the other Ru(II) complex-polynucelotide combinations: the luminescence intensity reached a maximum at an intermediate mixing ratio of 0.32, and gradually decreased as the mixing ratio increased. In contrast to other complexes at high mixing ratios, an upward bending curve was found in the Stern-Volmer plot, which indicates that the micro-environment of the Lambda-[Ru(phen)(2)DPPZ](2+) is heterogeneous. In the Delta-[Ru(phen)(2)DPPZ](2+)-poly(dT) complex case, formation of this highly luminescent species at an intermediate mixing ratio is far less effective.     

Photodissociation of a ruthenium(II) arene complex and its subsequent interactions with biomolecules: a density functional theory study

The piano-stool Ru(II) arene complex [(η(6)-benz)Ru(bpm)(py)](2+) (benz?=?benzene, bpm?=?2,2'-bipyrimidine, and py?=?pyridine), which is conventionally nonlabile (on a timescale and under conditions relevant for biological reactivity), can be activated by visible light to selectively photodissociate the monodentate ligand (py). In the present study, the aquation and binding of the photocontrolled ruthenium(II) arene complex [(η(6)-benz)Ru(bpm)(py)](2+) to various biomolecules are studied by density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TDDFT). Potential energy curves (PECs) calculated for the Ru-N (py) bonds in [(η(6)-benz)Ru(bpm)(py)](2+) in the singlet and triplet state give useful insights into the photodissociation mechanism of py. The binding energies of the various biomolecules are calculated, which allows the order of binding affinities among the considered nuleic-acid- or protein-binding sites to be discerned. The kinetics for the replacement of water in the aqua complex with biomolecules is also considered, and the results demonstrate that guanine is superior to other biomolecules in terms of coordinating with the Ru(II) aqua adduct, which is in reasonable agreement with experimental observations.     

Highly efficient supramolecular photocatalysts for CO2 reduction using visible light.

We report the most efficient homogeneous photocatalyst yet for CO(2) reduction using a wide range of visible-light wavelength. We synthesized new Ru(II)-Re(I) binuclear complexes with 1,3-bis(4'-methyl-[2,2']bipyridinyl-4-yl)-propan-2-ol (bpyC3bpy) as a bridge ligand, specifically [Ru-ReP(OEt)(3)](3+) and [Ru-Repy](3+) where a P(OEt)(3) or pyridine ligand coordinates on the Re site. Their photocatalytic activities were compared with [Ru-ReCl](2+), which has a Cl(-) ligand on the Re site and has recently been reported as a much better photocatalyst (Phi = 0.12, TN(CO) = 160) than a 1:1 mixed system of the corresponding Ru(II) and Re(I) mononuclear complexes. The best photocatalyst was [Ru-ReP(OEt)(3)](3+), for which Phi = 0.21 and TN(CO) = 232. A mechanistic study clearly showed that [Ru-ReP(OEt)(3)](3+) is rapidly converted into the solvento complex [Ru-ReSol](3+), (Sol = DMF or TEOA) which is the actual photocatalyst. Although similar rapid ligand substitution occurs with other supramolecules, the pyridine and Cl(-) anions accelerate the decomposition of the supramolecular photocatalysts.     

The effects of grafting of 2-pyridyl to [Ru(bpy)(2)(Hpip)](2+) on acid-base and DNA-binding properties: experimental and DFT studies

A new Ru(II) complex of [Ru(bpy)(2)(Hpip)](2+) {bpy = 2,2'bipyridine; Hppip = 2-(4-(pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline} has been synthesized by grafting of 2-pyridyl to parent complex [Ru(bpy)(2)(Hpip)](2+) {Hppip = 2-(4-phenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline}. The acid-base properties of [Ru(bpy)(2)(Hpip)](2+) studied by UV-visible and luminescence spectrophotometric pH titrations, revealed off-on-off luminescence switching of [Ru(bpy)(2)(Hpip)](2+) that was driven by the protonation/deprotonation of the imidazolyl and the pyridyl moieties. The complex was demonstrated to be a DNA intercalator with an intrinsic DNA binding constant of (5.56 ± 0.2) x 10(5) M-1 in buffered 50 mM NaCl, as evidenced by UV-visible and luminescence titrations, reverse salt effect, DNA competitive binding with ethidium bromide, steady-state emission quenching by [Fe(CN)6]4-, DNA melting experiments and viscosity measurements. The density functional theory method was also used to calculate geometric/electronic structures of the complex in an effort to understand the DNA binding properties. All the studies indicated that the introduction of 2-pyridyl onto Hpip ligand is more favorable for extension of conjugate plane of the main ligand than that of phenyl, and for greatly enhanced ct-DNA binding affinity accordingly.     

The dichotomy in the DNA-binding behaviour of ruthenium(II) complexes bearing benzoxazole and benzothiazole groups

The substituted tris(bipyridine)ruthenium(II) complexes {[Ru(bpy)(2)(4,4'-bbob)](2+) and [Ru(bpy)(2)(5,5'-bbob)](2+) [where bpy=2,2'-bipyridine and bbob=bis(benzoxazol-2-yl)-2,2'-bipyridine] have been prepared and compared to the previously studied complex [Ru(bpy)(2)(4,4'-bbtb)](2+) [where bbtb=bis(benzothiazol-2-yl)-2,2'-bipyridine]. From the UV/VIS titration studies, Delta-[Ru(bpy)(2)(4,4'-bbob)](2+) displays a stronger association than the Lambda-isomer with calf-thymus DNA (ct-DNA). For [Ru(bpy)(2)(5,5'-bbob)](2+), there appears to be minimal interaction with ct-DNA. The results of fluorescence titration studies suggest that [Ru(bpy)(2)(4,4'-bbob)](2+) gives an increase in emission intensity with increasing ct-DNA concentrations, with an enantiopreference for the Delta isomer, confirmed by membrane dialysis studies. The fluorescent intercalation displacement studies revealed that [Ru(bpy)(2)(4,4'-bbob)](2+) and [Ru(bpy)(2)(5,5'-bbob)](2+) display a preference for more open DNA structures such as bulge and hairpin sequences. While Lambda-[Ru(bpy)(2)(4,4'-bbtb)](2+) has shown the most significant affinity for all the oligonucleotides sequences screened in previous studies, it is the Delta isomer of the comparable benzoxazole ruthenium(II) complex (Delta-[Ru(bpy)(2)(4,4'-bbob)](2+)) that preferentially binds to DNA.     

Novel [Ru(polypyridine)(CO)2Cl2] and [Ru(polypyridine)2(CO)Cl]-type complexes: Characterizing the effects of introducing azopyridyl ligands by electrochemical, spectroscopic and crystallographic measurements

The reaction of ruthenium carbonyl polymer ([Ru(CO)₂Cl₂]_n) with azopyridyl compounds (2,2′-azobispyridine; apy or 2-phenylazopyridine; pap) generated new complexes, [Ru(azo)(CO)₂Cl₂] (azo = apy, pap). [Ru(apy)(CO)₂Cl₂] underwent photodecarbonylation to give a chloro-bridged dimer complex, whereas the corresponding pap complex ([Ru(pap)(CO)₂Cl₂]) was not converted to a dimer. The reactions of the chloro-bridged dimer containing the bpy ligand (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) with either apy or pap resulted in the formation of mixed polypyridyl complexes, [Ru(azo)(bpy)(CO)Cl]⁺. The novel complexes containing azo ligands were characterized by various spectroscopic measurements including the determination of X-ray crystallographic structures. Both [Ru(azo)(CO)₂Cl₂] complexes have two CO groups in a cis position to each other and two chlorides in a trans position. The azo groups are situated cis to the CO ligand in [Ru(azo)(bpy)(CO)Cl]⁺. All complexes have azo N-N bond lengths of 1.26-1.29 Å. The complexes exhibited azo-based two-electron reduction processes in electrochemical measurements. The effects of introducing azopyridyl ligands to the ruthenium carbonyl complexes were examined by ligand-based redox potentials, stretching frequencies and force constants of CO groups and bond parameters around Ru-CO moieties.     

The role of CO2 in cobalt-catalyzed peroxidations

Augmentation, by CO(2)/HCO(3)(-), of Co(II)-catalyzed peroxidations was explored to clarify whether the rate enhancement was due to CO(2) or to HCO(3)(-). The rate of oxidation of NADH by Co(II) plus H(2)O(2), in Tris or phosphate, was markedly enhanced by CO(2)/HCO(3)(-). Phosphate was seen to inhibit the Co(II)-catalyzed peroxidation, probably due to its sequestration of the Co(II). When CO(2) was used, there was an initial burst of NADH oxidation followed by a slower linear rate. The presence of carbonic anhydrase eliminated this initial burst; establishing that CO(2) rather than HCO(3)(-) was the species responsible for the observed rate enhancements. Both kinetic and spectral data indicated that Co(II) was converted by H(2)O(2) into a less active form from which Co(II) could be regenerated. This less active form absorbed in both the UV and visible regions, and is assumed to be a peroxy bridged binuclear complex. The rate of formation of this absorbing form was increased by HCO(3)(-)/CO(2). A minimal mechanism consistent with these observations is proposed.     

Substitution reaction mechanisms of dihydrido-ruthenium(II) phosphine complexes: hydribe basicity and molecular hydrogen intermediates

Kinetic and activation parameter data for the reactions of cct-Ru(H)₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ (1) (cct = cis, cis, trans) in THF with thiols, CO and PPh₃ to give cct-RuH(SR)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂, Ru(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂ and Ru(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂, respectively, reveal a common, rate-determining step, the initial dissociation of H₂ from 1; the activated complex probably resembles the corresponding Ru(η²-H₂) species. Reaction of Ru(H)₂(dppm)₂ (2) (as a cis/trans mixture, DPPM = bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) with thiols initially generated cis- and trans- RuH(SR) (dppm)₂ with a rate that depends on both the type and concentration of thiol. The higher basicity of the hydride ligands in 2 (versus 1), which is demonstrated by deuterium exchange with CD₃OD, gives rise in the thiol reaction to an initial protonation step prior to loss of H₂. A species detected in the thiol reaction is possibly [RuH(η²-H₂ (dppm)₂]², the anticipated intermediate for this reaction and for the hydrogen exchange with alcohol. A longer reaction of 2 with PhCH₂SH gives solely cis-Ru(SCH₂Ph)₂(dppm)₂.     

One-electron reduction of S-nitrosothiols in aqueous medium

One-electron reduction of S-nitrosothiols (RSNO) has been studied using radiolytically produced reducing entity, the hydrated electron (e(aq)(-)), in aqueous medium. Both kinetics of the reaction and the mechanistic aspects of the decomposition of S-nitroso derivatives of glutathione, L-cysteine, N-acetyl-L-cysteine, N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine, N-acetylcysteamine, L-cysteine methyl ester, and D,L-penicillamine have been investigated at neutral and acidic pH. The second-order rate constants of the reaction of e(aq)(-) with RSNOs were determined using a pulse radiolysis technique and were found to be diffusion controlled (10(10) dm(3) mol(-1) s(-1)) at neutral pH. The product analysis using HPLC, fluorimetry, and MS revealed the formation of thiol and nitric oxide as the major end products. It is therefore proposed that one-electron reduction of RSNO leads to the liberation of NO. There is no intermediacy of a thiyl radical as in the case of oxidation reactions of RSNOs. The radical anion of RSNO (RSN(*)O(-)) is proposed as a possible intermediate. The overall reaction could be written as RSNO + e(aq)(-) --H+--> RSH + (*)NO.     

The [Ru(Hedta)NO](0.1-) system: structure, chemical reactivity and biological assays

The [Ru(II)(Hedta)NO(+)] complex is a diamagnetic species crystallizing in a distorted octahedral geometry, with the Ru-N(O) length 1.756(4) A and the RuNO angle 172.3(4) degrees . The complex contains one protonated carboxylate (pK(a)=2.7+/-0.1). The [Ru(II)(Hedta)NO(+)] complex undergoes a nitrosyl-centered one-electron reduction (chemical or electrochemical), with E(NO+/NO)=-0.31 V vs SCE (I=0.2 M, pH 1), yielding [Ru(II)(Hedta)NO](-), which aquates slowly: k(-NO)=2.1+/-0.4x10(-3) s(-1) (pH 1.0, I=0.2 M, CF(3)COOH/NaCF(3)COO, 25 degrees C). At pHs>12, the predominant species, [Ru(II)(edta)NO](-), reacts according to [Ru(II)(edta)NO](-)+2OH(-)-->[Ru(II)(edta)NO(2)](3-), with K(eq)=1.0+/-0.4 x 10(3) M(-2) (I=1.0 M, NaCl; T=25.0+/-0.1 degrees C). The rate-law is first order in each of the reactants for most reaction conditions, with k(OH(-))=4.35+/-0.02 M(-1)s(-1) (25.0 degrees C), assignable mechanistically to the elementary step comprising the attack of one OH(-) on [Ru(II)(edta)NO](-), with subsequent fast deprotonation of the [Ru(II)(edta)NO(2)H](2-) intermediate. The activation parameters were DeltaH(#)=60+/-1 kJ/mol, DeltaS(#)=-31+/-3 J/Kmol, consistent with a nucleophilic addition process between likely charged ions. In the toxicity up-and-down tests performed with Swiss mice, no death was observed in all the doses administered (3-9.08 x 10(-5) mol/kg). The biodistribution tests performed with Wistar male rats showed metal in the liver, kidney, urine and plasma. Eight hours after the injection no metal was detected in the samples. The vasodilator effect of [Ru(II)(edta)NO](-) was studied in aortic rings without endothelium, and was compared with sodium nitroprusside (SNP). The times of maximal effects of [Ru(II)(edta)NO](-) and SNP were 2 h and 12 min, respectively, suggesting that [Ru(II)(edta)NO](-) releases NO slowly to the medium in comparison with SNP.     

Coreactant electrogenerated chemiluminescence of ruthenium porphyrins

The coreactant electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) of 5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-21H,23H-porphine ruthenium(II) carbonyl (Ru(TPP)(CO))), and 2,3,7,8,12,13,17, 18-octaethyl-21H,23H-porphine ruthenium(II) carbonyl (Ru(OEP)(CO)) in acetonitrile is reported. Both complexes have absorption maxima in the visible region of the spectrum and emit in fluid solution at room temperature around 650 nm in acetonitrile. Photoluminescence efficiencies (?_em) were between 1.5 × 10⁻⁴ and 4.0 × 10⁻⁴ when compared to (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) with ?_em = 0.042. The complexes show two-electrochemically reversible oxidations via cyclic voltammetry. ECL was generated using tri-n-propylamine (TPrA) as an oxidative-reductive coreactant and the ECL peaks at a potential corresponding to oxidation of both the TPrA and both of the porphyrin oxidations. ECL efficiencies (?_ecl) were 0.65 for Ru(TPP)(CO) and 0.58 for Ru(OEP)(CO) when compared to (?_ecl = 1). Also, qualitative studies using transmission filters suggest that both complexes emit ECL in approximately the same region as their photoluminescence, indicating that the same excited state is formed in both experiments.     

The reactivity of ruthenium mono(bipyridine) carbonyl complexes in an alcoholic solution of alkali metal carbonates

Chlorine containing ruthenium bipyridine carbonyl compounds react readily in dilute alkaline solutions under a CO atmosphere affording a poorly soluble and air sensitive product that is suggested to have a polymeric nature. Various analysis methods (MS and TPD) were used in the characterisation of the product. The replacement of the axial chloride ligands in trans(Cl), cis(CO)[Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂] and [Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl]₂ is proposed to be the initial step in the polymerisation. The replacement of chlorides in methanolic solution was confirmed by isolating and characterising the dimeric intermediate [Ru(bpy)(CO)₂(COOCH₃)]₂.     

Influence of the anionic ligands on the anticancer activity of Ru(II)-dmso complexes: Kinetics of aquation and in vitro cytotoxicity of new dicarboxylate compounds in comparison with their chloride precursors

We performed extensive studies on the kinetics of hydrolysis of a series of Ru(II)-dmso complexes containing dicarboxylate ligands, such as oxalate, malonate, succinate and 1,1-cyclobutane dicarboxylate (cbdc), derived from anticancer-active Ru(II)-dmso-Cl precursors. The in vitro antitumor activity of those compounds in comparison with their chloride precursors was evaluated against two tumor cell lines, the human KB oral carcinoma and the murine B16-F10 melanoma. The aim of this study was to assess how the nature of the anionic ligands (i.e. dicarboxylates vs. chlorides) affects the chemical behavior and the in vitro antitumor activity of Ru(II)-dmso complexes. Among the tested compounds only one complex, the dimer [fac-Ru(dmso-S)(3)(H(2)O)(mu-cbdc)](2) (5), exhibited moderate activity against both cell lines. Interestingly, this compound is the most kinetically stable in aqueous solution among those investigated. Despite the moderate in vitro activity, in an in vivo test, complex 5 exhibited no activity against both the primary tumor growth and the formation of spontaneous metastases on the MCa mammary carcinoma model.     

Synthesis and structure of cycloruthenated carbonyl complexes and their emission, redox and biological properties

An interesting series of mononuclear organoruthenium complexes of formulation [Ru(CO)(PPh3)2(ap-R)] (where ap-R = -H, -Cl, -Me, -OMe, -OEt) have been synthesized from the reaction of five 2-(arylazo)phenol ligands with ruthenium(II) precursor [RuH(Cl)(CO)(PPh3)3] in benzene under reflux. The 2-(arylazo)phenolate ligands behave as dianionic tridentate ligand and are coordinated to ruthenium through C, N and O by dissociation of the phenolic and phenyl proton at the ortho position of the phenyl ring forming two five-membered chelate rings. These complexes have been characterized by elemental analysis, FT-IR, 1H NMR and UV-visible spectroscopy. In dichloromethane solution all the metal complexes exhibit characteristic metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) absorption and emission bands in the visible region. The structures of [Ru(CO)(PPh3)2(ap-H)] and [Ru(CO)(PPh3)2(ap-Cl)] have been determined by X-ray crystallography. Cyclic voltammetric data of all the complexes show a Ru(III)/Ru(II) oxidation and reduction Ru(II)/Ru(I) within the range 0.74-0.84 V and -0.38 to -0.50 V vs saturated calomel electrode (SCE) respectively. The potentials are observed with respect to the electronic nature of substituents (R) in the 2-(arylazo)phenolate ligands. Further, the free ligands and their ruthenium complexes have also been screened for their antibacterial and antifungal activities, which have shown great promise in inhibiting the growth of both gram +ve and gram -ve bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli and fungus Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger. These results made it desirable to delineate a comparison between free ligands and their complexes.     

Luminescence quenching of Ru-labeled oligonucleotides by targeted complementary strands.

The yield of hole injection into guanines of different oligonucleotide duplexes by a photooxidizing tethered Ru(II) complex is examined by measuring the luminescence quenching of the excited complex. This yield is investigated as a function of the anchoring site of the complex (on a thymine nucleobase in the middle of the sequence or on the 5' terminal phosphate) and the number and position of the guanine bases as compared with the site of attachment of the Ru(II) compound. In contrast to other studies, the tethered complex, [Ru(tap)(2)(dip)](2+), is a non-intercalating compound and has been shown previously to produce an irreversible photocrosslinking between the two strands as the ultimate step of hole injection. The study of luminescence quenching of the anchored complex by emission intensity and lifetime measurements for the different duplexes indicates that a direct contact between the complex and the guanine nucleobase is needed for the electron transfer to take place. Moreover, for none of the sequences a clear contribution of a static quenching is evidenced independently of the two types of attachment of the [Ru(tap)(2)(dip)](2+) complex to the oligonucleotide. A comparison of the fastest hole-injection process by electron transfer to the excited anchored [Ru(tap)(2)(dip)](2+), with the rate of the photo-electron transfer between the same complex free in solution and guanosine-5'-monophosphate, indicates that the hole injection by the anchored complex is slower by a factor of 10 at least. A bad overlap between donor and acceptor orbitals is probably the cause of this slow rate, which could be attributed to some steric hindrance induced by the complex linker.     

Photoelectron transfer processes with ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes and Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase

The processes that are photoinduced by [Ru(bpz)(3)](2+) (bpz = 2,2'-bipyrazyl) in the presence of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn SOD) are investigated by laser flash photolysis and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy; they are compared to those of the system [Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)-Cu/Zn SOD]. Although the mechanism is complicated, primary and secondary reactions can be evidenced. First, the excited [Ru(bpz)(3)](2+) complex is quenched reductively by Cu/Zn SOD with the production of a reduced complex and an oxidized enzyme. The oxidation site of Cu/Zn SOD is proposed to correspond to amino acids located on the surface of the protein. Afterward and only when this reductive electron transfer to the excited complex has produced enough oxidized protein, another electron-transfer process can be evidenced. In this case, however, the charge-transfer process takes place in the other direction, i.e., from the excited complex to the Cu(II) center of the SOD with the formation of Ru(III) and Cu(I) species. This proposed mechanism is supported by the fact that [Ru(bpy)(3)](2+), which is less photo-oxidizing than [Ru(bpz)(3)](2+), exhibits no photoreaction with Cu/Zn SOD. Because Ru(III) species are generated as intermediates with [Ru(bpz)(3)](2+), they are proposed to be responsible for the enhancement of [poly(dG-dC)](2) and [poly(dA-dT)](2) oxidation observed when Cu/Zn SOD is added to the [Ru(bpz)(3)](2+)-DNA system.     

Interaction of polypyridyl ruthenium (II) complex containing asymmetric ligand with DNA

A novel asymmetric bidentate ruthenium (II) complex, [Ru(bpy)(2)(PYNI)](2+) (bpy=2,2'-bipyridine, PYNI=2-(2'-pyridyl)naphthoimidazole), has been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, ES-MS (electrospray mass spectra) and (1)H NMR. The electrochemical behaviors of this complex were studied by cyclic voltammetry. DNA interaction studies suggest that [Ru(bpy)(2)(PYNI)](2+) binds to calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) in an intercalative mode. Interestingly, this new Ru(II) complex has also been found to promote cleavage of plasmid pBR 322 DNA from the supercoiled form I to the open circular form II upon irradiation.     

Effect of surface charges on the rates of intermolecular electron-transfer between de novo designed metalloproteins

A de novo designed coiled-coil metalloprotein was prepared that uses electrostatic interactions to control both its conformational and bimolecular electron-transfer properties. The title protein exists as a coiled-coil heterodimer of the [Ru(trpy)(bpy)-KK(37-mer)] and [Ru(NH(3))(5)-EE(37-mer)] polypeptides which is formed by interhelix electrostatic attractions. Circular dichroism studies show that the electrostatic heterodimer has K(d) = 0.19 +/- 0.03 microM and is 96% helical at high concentrations. Intercomplex electron-transfer reactions were studied that involve the [Ru(NH(3))(5)-H21](2+) electron-donor and the [Ru(trpy)(bpy)-H21](3+) electron-acceptor belonging to different electrostatic dimers. An important feature of the designed metalloprotein is its two cationic redox centers embedded within protein surfaces having opposite charge. Thus, the Ru(II)(NH(3))(5)-H21 site was placed on the surface of one chain of the coiled-coil which was made to be positively charged, and the Ru(III)(trpy)(bpy)-H21 site was placed on the surface of the other chain which was negatively charged. The rates of intermolecular electron-transfer increased from (1.9 +/- 0.4) x 10(7) M(-1) s(-1) to (3.7 +/- 0.5) x 10(7) M(-1) s(-1) as the ionic strength was increased from 0.01 to 0.20 M. This indicates that the electrostatic repulsion between the ruthenium centers dominates the kinetics of these reactions. However, the presence of the oppositely charged protein surfaces in the coiled-coils creates an electrostatic recognition domain that substantially ameliorates the effects of this repulsion.