Breast reconstruction without an implant: results and complications using an extended latissimus dorsi flap

The results of 55 breast reconstructions using an extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap without an implant are reported. A method for preoperatively estimating the flap volume, operative details, and a technique for insetting the flap are reviewed. Good, fair, and poor results were achieved in 69, 24, and 7 percent of patients, respectively. Examples are illustrated. The poor results were all due to major complications and are analyzed in detail. Significant complications affecting the end result occurred in 14.5 percent of patients, and nonsignificant and minor complications occurred in 33 percent. Flap volume is shown to be fairly accurately predictable. Seventy percent of flaps had a volume in excess of 400 cc. The reconstructed volume, cosmetic results, and complication rates are compared with those of other reported series. Good results can be achieved with this method, quite comparable to other methods, and with similar complication rates, but without the problems associated with the use of a prosthetic implant.     

Breast reconstruction after breast cancer

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the mental, emotional, and physical benefits of reconstruction in breast cancer patients. 2. Compare the most common techniques of reconstruction in patients and detail benefits and risks associated with each. 3. Outline different methods of reconstruction and identify the method considered best for the patient based on timing of the procedures, body type, adjuvant therapies, and other coexisting conditions. 4. Distinguish between some of the different flaps that can be considered for autologous reconstruction. SUMMARY: Breast cancer is unfortunately a common disease affecting millions of women, often at a relatively young age. Reconstruction following mastectomy offers women an opportunity to mollify some of the emotional and aesthetic effects of this devastating disease. Although varying techniques of alloplastic and autologous techniques are available, all strive to achieve the same goal: the satisfactory reformation of a breast mound that appears as natural as possible without clothing and at the very least is normal in appearance under clothing. This article summarizes the various approaches to breast reconstruction and offers a balanced view of the risks and benefits of each, all of which in the end offer the opportunity for excellent and predictable results with a high degree of patient satisfaction.     

Expandable breast implant reconstruction of Tikhoff-Linberg shoulder deformity

Expanding breast implants were used in two patients to reconstruct shoulder contour following a Tikhoff-Linberg resection for cancer. In the first patient, one implant alone was used, and in the second patient, two implants in separate but adjacent pockets. The resulting double contour is more pleasing than that after a single implant, and there also appears to be more flexibility with shoulder motion. This method is suggested as an excellent means of reconstructing the contour of the shoulder area following resection for cancer.     

Breast augmentation using the spectrum implant with exteriorized injection domes

The author describes the use of implants with exteriorized injection domes for patients undergoing breast augmentation. Domes were exteriorized for 1 to 5 days to allow the implant volume to be altered in the early postoperative period. Thirty-three patients were treated without any infections.     

Breast reconstruction using modified tissue expansion

Inadequate chest-wall skin following mastectomy for carcinoma continues to be a problem in many breast reconstructions. To avoid extensive surgery, serial tissue expansion has been advocated. Since 1977, one of the authors has used a simple method of tissue expansion that we have termed "modified tissue expansion", defined as the creation of an adequate breast mound in one or two stages using a permanent prosthesis. Ninety percent of patients undergoing breast reconstruction between 1978 and 1983 were reconstructed using this method. A retrospective analysis of these 208 patients is presented. There were no mortalities, and only a 6.3 percent complication rate. Skin necroses related directly to the prosthesis occurred once, and there were no prosthetic deflations. Eighteen percent had first-step reconstruction only. The initial prosthesis averaged 400 cc in size. Selected Halsted radical mastectomy and postradiotherapy patients were successfully reconstructed. Seventy-eight percent felt their results were excellent at 1 year. Two percent were dissatisfied. Multiple office visits and the potential problems of serial expansion were avoided. Modified tissue expansion is a simple and viable method and should be considered among the options for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.     

Clinical experience with Heyer-Schulte inflatable implants in breast augmentation

Following breast augmentation, 100 patients with inflatable saline implants were followed for a period of 6 months to 8 1/2 years. Capsular contracture rate, Baker II or greater, was 3.4 percent. This low rate of capsular contracture is attributed to early manipulation of the implant. The deflation rate was also 3.4 percent. The Heyer-Schulte (Mentor) inflatable implant offers an acceptable low rate of leakage to justify its continued use. It also offers an advantage in correction of asymmetries and yields softer breasts. The replacement of an occasional deflated implant does not appear to pose more than a minor nuisance nor to materially compromise the possibility of an excellent long-term result.