An InCytes from MBC Selection: Specificity of Cytoplasmic Dynein Subunits in Discrete Membrane-trafficking Steps

The cytoplasmic dynein motor complex is known to exist in multiple forms, but few specific functions have been assigned to individual subunits. A key limitation in the analysis of dynein in intact mammalian cells has been the reliance on gross perturbation of dynein function, e.g., inhibitory antibodies, depolymerization of the entire microtubule network, or the use of expression of dominant negative proteins that inhibit dynein indirectly. Here, we have used RNAi and automated image analysis to define roles for dynein subunits in distinct membrane-trafficking processes. Depletion of a specific subset of dynein subunits, notably LIC1 (DYNC1LI1) but not LIC2 (DYNC1LI2), recapitulates a direct block of ER export, revealing that dynein is required to maintain the steady-state composition of the Golgi, through ongoing ER-to-Golgi transport. Suppression of LIC2 but not of LIC1 results in a defect in recycling endosome distribution and cytokinesis. Biochemical analyses also define the role of each subunit in stabilization of the dynein complex; notably, suppression of DHC1 or IC2 results in concomitant loss of Tctex1. Our data demonstrate that LIC1 and LIC2 define distinct dynein complexes that function at the Golgi versus recycling endosomes, respectively, suggesting that functional populations of dynein mediate discrete intracellular trafficking pathways.     

Dynein LIC1 localizes to the mitotic spindle and midbody and LIC2 localizes to spindle poles during cell division

CD-1 (cytoplasmic dynein-1) is a multisubunit motor protein complex involved in intracellular trafficking and mitosis. The dynein LIC (light intermediate chain) subunits, LIC1 (DLIC-1, gene symbol DYNC1LI1) and LIC2 (DLIC-2, gene symbol DYNC1LI2), associate with the dynein HC (heavy chain) in a mutually exclusive manner and thus define distinct functional CD-1 complexes. Here, we analysed the mitotic distribution of LIC1 and LIC2. We found that from metaphase through anaphase, LIC1 localizes to the mitotic spindle and concentrates within the midbody during the abscission step of cytokinesis. Conversely, LIC2 strongly localizes to the spindle poles from prophase through telophase. These data suggest distinct functions for LIC1 and LIC2-containing CD-1 complexes during cell division.     

Activation of endosomal dynein motors by stepwise assembly of Rab7-RILP-p150Glued, ORP1L, and the receptor betalll spectrin

The small GTPase Rab7 controls late endocytic transport by the minus end-directed motor protein complex dynein-dynactin, but how it does this is unclear. Rab7-interacting lysosomal protein (RILP) and oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 1L (ORP1L) are two effectors of Rab7. We show that GTP-bound Rab7 simultaneously binds RILP and ORP1L to form a RILP-Rab7-ORP1L complex. RILP interacts directly with the C-terminal 25-kD region of the dynactin projecting arm p150(Glued), which is required for dynein motor recruitment to late endocytic compartments (LEs). Still, p150(Glued) recruitment by Rab7-RILP does not suffice to induce dynein-driven minus-end transport of LEs. ORP1L, as well as betaIII spectrin, which is the general receptor for dynactin on vesicles, are essential for dynein motor activity. Our results illustrate that the assembly of microtubule motors on endosomes involves a cascade of linked events. First, Rab7 recruits two effectors, RILP and ORP1L, to form a tripartite complex. Next, RILP directly binds to the p150(Glued) dynactin subunit to recruit the dynein motor. Finally, the specific dynein motor receptor Rab7-RILP is transferred by ORP1L to betaIII spectrin. Dynein will initiate translocation of late endosomes to microtubule minus ends only after interacting with betaIII spectrin, which requires the activities of Rab7-RILP and ORP1L.     

BICD2, dynactin,and LIS1 cooperate in regulating dynein recruitment to cellular structures

Cytoplasmic dynein is the major microtubule minus-end–directed cellular motor. Most dynein activities require dynactin, but the mechanisms regulating cargo-dependent dynein–dynactin interaction are poorly understood. In this study, we focus on dynein–dynactin recruitment to cargo by the conserved motor adaptor Bicaudal D2 (BICD2). We show that dynein and dynactin depend on each other for BICD2-mediated targeting to cargo and that BICD2 N-terminus (BICD2-N) strongly promotes stable interaction between dynein and dynactin both in vitro and in vivo. Direct visualization of dynein in live cells indicates that by itself the triple BICD2-N–dynein–dynactin complex is unable to interact with either cargo or microtubules. However, tethering of BICD2-N to different membranes promotes their microtubule minus-end–directed motility. We further show that LIS1 is required for dynein-mediated transport induced by membrane tethering of BICD2-N and that LIS1 contributes to dynein accumulation at microtubule plus ends and BICD2-positive cellular structures. Our results demonstrate that dynein recruitment to cargo requires concerted action of multiple dynein cofactors.     

Phosphorylation and Pin1 binding to the LIC1 subunit selectively regulate mitotic dynein functions

The dynein motor performs multiple functions in mitosis by engaging with a wide cargo spectrum. One way to regulate dynein’s cargo-binding selectivity is through the C-terminal domain (CTD) of its light intermediate chain 1 subunit (LIC1), which binds directly with cargo adaptors. Here we show that mitotic phosphorylation of LIC1-CTD at its three cdk1 sites is required for proper mitotic progression, for dynein loading onto prometaphase kinetochores, and for spindle assembly checkpoint inactivation in human cells. Mitotic LIC1-CTD phosphorylation also engages the prolyl isomerase Pin1 predominantly to Hook2-dynein-Nde1-Lis1 complexes, but not to dynein-spindly-dynactin complexes. LIC1-CTD dephosphorylation abrogates dynein-Pin1 binding, promotes prophase centrosome–nuclear envelope detachment, and impairs metaphase chromosome congression and mitotic Golgi fragmentation, without affecting interphase membrane transport. Phosphomutation of a conserved LIC1-CTD SP site in zebrafish leads to early developmental defects. Our work reveals that LIC1-CTD phosphorylation differentially regulates distinct mitotic dynein pools and suggests the evolutionary conservation of this phosphoregulation.     

Dynein binds and stimulates axonal motility of the endosome adaptor and NEEP21 family member,calcyon

The neuron-enriched, endosomal protein Calcyon (Caly) regulates endocytosis and vesicle sorting, and is important for synaptic plasticity and brain development. In the current investigation of Caly interacting proteins in brain, the microtubule retrograde motor subunit, cytoplasmic dynein 1 heavy chain (DYNC1H), and microtubule structural proteins, α and β tubulin, were identified as Caly associated proteins by MALDI-ToF/ToF. Direct interaction of the Caly-C terminus with dynein and tubulin was further confirmed in in vitro studies. In Cos-7 cells, mCherry-Caly moved along the microtubule network in organelles largely labeled by the late endosome marker Rab7. Expression of the dynein inhibitor CC1, produced striking alterations in Caly distribution, consistent with retrograde motors playing a prominent role in Caly localization and movement. In axons of cultured adult rat sensory neurons, Caly-positive organelles co-localized with dynein intermediate chain (DYNC1I1-isoform IC-1B) and the dynein regulator, lissencephaly 1 (LIS1), both of which co-precipitated from brain with the Caly C-terminus. Manipulation of dynein function in axons altered the motile properties of Caly indicating that Caly vesicles utilize the retrograde motor. Altogether, the current evidence for association with dynein motors raises the possibility that the endocytic and cargo sorting functions of Caly in neurons could be regulated by interaction with the microtubule transport system.     

A Neurospora crassa Arp1 mutation affecting cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin localization

Of the actin-related proteins, Arp1 is the most similar to conventional actin, and functions solely as a component of the multisubunit complex dynactin. Dynactin has been identified as an activator of the microtubule-associated motor cytoplasmic dynein. The role of Arp1 within dynactin is two-fold: (1) it serves as a structural scaffold protein for other dynactin subunits; and (2) it has been proposed to link dynactin, and thereby dynein, with membranous cargo via interaction with spectrin. Using the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa, we have identified genes encoding subunits of cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin. In this study, we describe a genetic screen for N. crassa Arp1 (ro-4) mutants that are defective for dynactin function. We report that the ro-4(E8) mutant is unusual in that it shows alterations in the localization of cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin and in microtubule organization. In the mutant, dynein/dynactin complexes co-localize with bundled microtubules at hyphal tips. Given that dynein transports membranous cargo from hyphal tips to distal regions, the cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin complexes that accumulate along microtubule tracts at hyphal tips in the ro-4(E8) mutant may have either reduced motor activity or be delayed for activation of motor activity following cargo binding.     

Dynein/Dynactin-mediated transport of kinetochore components off kinetochores and onto spindle poles induced by nordihydroguaiaretic acid

The mitotic checkpoint functions to ensure accurate chromosome segregation by regulating the progression from metaphase to anaphase. Once the checkpoint has been satisfied, it is inactivated in order to allow the cell to proceed into anaphase and complete the cell cycle. The minus end-directed microtubule motor dynein/dynactin has been implicated in the silencing of the mitotic checkpoint by "stripping" checkpoint proteins off kinetochores. A recent study suggested that Nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) stimulates dynein/dynactin-mediated transport of its cargo including ZW10 (Zeste White 10). We analyzed the effects of NDGA on dynein/dynactin dependent transport of the RZZ (Zeste White 10, Roughdeal, Zwilch) complex as well as other kinetochore components from kinetochores to spindle poles. Through this approach we have catalogued several kinetochore and centromere components as dynein/dynactin cargo. These include hZW10, hZwilch, hROD, hSpindly, hMad1, hMad2, hCENP-E, hCdc27, cyclin-B and hMps1. Furthermore, we found that treatment with NDGA induced a robust accumulation and complete stabilization of hZW10 at spindle poles. This finding suggests that NDGA may not induce dynein/dynactin transport but rather interfere with cargo release. Lastly, we determined that NDGA induced accumulation of checkpoint proteins at the poles requires dynein/dynactin-mediated transport, hZW10 kinetochore localization and kinetochore-microtubule attachments but not tension or Aurora B kinase activity.     

In vitro reconstitution of a highly processive recombinant human dynein complex

Cytoplasmic dynein is an approximately 1.4 MDa multi‐protein complex that transports many cellular cargoes towards the minus ends of microtubules. Several in vitro studies of mammalian dynein have suggested that individual motors are not robustly processive, raising questions about how dynein‐associated cargoes can move over long distances in cells. Here, we report the production of a fully recombinant human dynein complex from a single baculovirus in insect cells. Individual complexes very rarely show directional movement in vitro. However, addition of dynactin together with the N‐terminal region of the cargo adaptor BICD2 (BICD2N) gives rise to unidirectional dynein movement over remarkably long distances. Single‐molecule fluorescence microscopy provides evidence that BICD2N and dynactin stimulate processivity by regulating individual dynein complexes, rather than by promoting oligomerisation of the motor complex. Negative stain electron microscopy reveals the dynein–dynactin–BICD2N complex to be well ordered, with dynactin positioned approximately along the length of the dynein tail. Collectively, our results provide insight into a novel mechanism for coordinating cargo binding with long‐distance motor movement.     

Overexpression of the Dynamitin (p50) Subunit of the Dynactin Complex Disrupts Dynein-dependent Maintenance of Membrane Organelle Distribution

Dynactin is a multisubunit complex that plays an accessory role in cytoplasmic dynein function. Overexpression in mammalian cells of one dynactin subunit, dynamitin, disrupts the complex, resulting in dissociation of cytoplasmic dynein from prometaphase kinetochores, with consequent perturbation of mitosis (Echeverri, C.J., B.M. Paschal, K.T. Vaughan, and R.B. Vallee. 1996. J. Cell Biol. 132:617–634). Based on these results, dynactin was proposed to play a role in linking cytoplasmic dynein to kinetochores and, potentially, to membrane organelles. The current study reports on the dynamitin interphase phenotype. In dynamitin-overexpressing cells, early endosomes (labeled with antitransferrin receptor), as well as late endosomes and lysosomes (labeled with anti–lysosome-associated membrane protein-1 [LAMP-1]), were redistributed to the cell periphery. This redistribution was disrupted by nocodazole, implicating an underlying plus end–directed microtubule motor activity. The Golgi stack, monitored using sialyltransferase, galactosyltransferase, and N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I, was dramatically disrupted into scattered structures that colocalized with components of the intermediate compartment (ERGIC-53 and ERD-2). The disrupted Golgi elements were revealed by EM to represent short stacks similar to those formed by microtubule-depolymerizing agents. Golgi-to-ER traffic of stack markers induced by brefeldin A was not inhibited by dynamitin overexpression. Time-lapse observations of dynamitin-overexpressing cells recovering from brefeldin A treatment revealed that the scattered Golgi elements do not undergo microtubule-based transport as seen in control cells, but rather, remain stationary at or near their ER exit sites. These results indicate that dynactin is specifically required for ongoing centripetal movement of endocytic organelles and components of the intermediate compartment. Results similar to those of dynamitin overexpression were obtained by microinjection with antidynein intermediate chain antibody, consistent with a role for dynactin in mediating interactions of cytoplasmic dynein with specific membrane organelles. These results suggest that dynamitin plays a pivotal role in regulating organelle movement at the level of motor–cargo binding.     

Microtubule binding by dynactin is required for microtubule organization but not cargo transport

Dynactin links cytoplasmic dynein and other motors to cargo and is involved in organizing radial microtubule arrays. The largest subunit of dynactin, p150(glued), binds the dynein intermediate chain and has an N-terminal microtubule-binding domain. To examine the role of microtubule binding by p150(glued), we replaced the wild-type p150(glued) in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells with mutant DeltaN-p150 lacking residues 1-200, which is unable to bind microtubules. Cells treated with cytochalasin D were used for analysis of cargo movement along microtubules. Strikingly, although the movement of both membranous organelles and messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes by dynein and kinesin-1 requires dynactin, the substitution of full-length p150(glued) with DeltaN-p150(glued) has no effect on the rate, processivity, or step size of transport. However, truncation of the microtubule-binding domain of p150(glued) has a dramatic effect on cell division, resulting in the generation of multipolar spindles and free microtubule-organizing centers. Thus, dynactin binding to microtubules is required for organizing spindle microtubule arrays but not cargo motility in vivo.     

Cytoplasmic dynein ATPase activity is regulated by dynactin-dependent phosphorylation

Cytoplasmic dynein is a microtubule-associated motor that utilizes ATP hydrolysis to conduct minus-end directed transport of various organelles. Dynactin is a multisubunit complex that has been proposed to both link dynein with cargo and activate dynein motor function. The mechanisms by which dynactin regulates dynein activity are not clear. In this study, we examine the role of dynactin in regulating dynein ATPase activity. We show that dynein-microtubule binding and ATP-dependent release of dynein from microtubules are reduced in dynactin null mutants, Deltaro-3 (p150(Glued)) and Deltaro-4 (Arp1), relative to wild-type. The dynein-microtubule binding activity, but not the ATP-dependent release of dynein from microtubules, is restored by in vitro mixing of extracts from dynein and dynactin mutants. Dynein produced in a Deltaro-3 mutant has approximately 8-fold reduced ATPase activity relative to dynein isolated from wild-type. However, dynein ATPase activity from wild-type is not reduced when dynactin is separated from dynein, suggesting that dynein produced in a dynactin mutant is inactivated. Treatment of dynein isolated from the Deltaro-3 mutant with lambda protein phosphatase restores the ATPase activity to near wild-type levels. The reduced dynein ATPase activity observed in dynactin null mutants is mainly due to altered affinity for ATP. Radiolabeling experiments revealed that low molecular mass proteins, particularly 20- and 8-kDa proteins, that immunoprecipitate with dynein heavy chain are hyperphosphorylated in the dynactin mutant and dephosphorylated upon lambda protein phosphatase treatment. The results suggest that cytoplasmic dynein ATPase activity is regulated by dynactin-dependent phosphorylation of dynein light chains.     

Dynactin's pointed-end complex is a cargo-targeting module

Dynactin is an essential part of the cytoplasmic dynein motor that enhances motor processivity and serves as an adaptor that allows dynein to bind cargoes. Much is known about dynactin''s interaction with dynein and microtubules, but how it associates with its diverse complement of subcellular binding partners remains mysterious. It has been suggested that cargo specification involves a group of subunits referred to as the “pointed-end complex.” We used chemical cross-linking, RNA interference, and protein overexpression to characterize interactions within the pointed-end complex and explore how it contributes to dynactin''s interactions with endomembranes. The Arp11 subunit, which caps one end of dynactin''s Arp1 filament, and p62, which binds Arp11 and Arp1, are necessary for dynactin stability. These subunits also allow dynactin to bind the nuclear envelope prior to mitosis. p27 and p25, by contrast, are peripheral components that can be removed without any obvious impact on dynactin integrity. Dynactin lacking these subunits shows reduced membrane binding. Depletion of p27 and p25 results in impaired early and recycling endosome movement, but late endosome movement is unaffected, and mitotic spindles appear normal. We conclude that the pointed-end complex is a bipartite structural domain that stabilizes dynactin and supports its binding to different subcellular structures.     

Backseat drivers: Regulation of dynein motility

Control of the activity of the microtubule motor cytoplasmic dynein 1 is essential for its function in intracellular transport. A recent paper by McKenney et al. published in Science shows that activation of processive dynein motility requires the formation of cargo adaptor-dynein-dynactin complexes.Cells rely on their intracellular components being in the right place at the right time. In eukaryotic cells, microtubule-based transport by motor proteins belonging to the dynein and kinesin families plays a crucial role in regulating the spatial-temporal distribution of a multitude of membrane bound organelles, protein complexes, and ribonucleoprotein complexes. Disruption of these transport functions can play a key role in pathological processes and the activities of microtubule motors are frequently usurped by both viral and bacterial pathogens to aid their replication¹. Cytoplasmic dynein 1 is the predominant motor protein complex mediating transport towards the minus end of microtubules and it transports many different cargoes². The dynein holoenzyme is composed of a dimeric heavy chain that contains the microtubule-binding and AAA-ATPase motor domains associated with a series of smaller accessory proteins implicated in regulation and cargo binding. Targeting of the motor to a specific cargo is often mediated by so-called ''adaptor proteins'' that can associate with both the cargo (e.g., endosomes) and the motor complex itself.Diverse functions and diverse cargoes necessitate a high level of cytoplasmic dynein regulation. Such regulation must limit motor activity to prevent wasteful ATP hydrolysis in the absence of cargo transport and prevent inappropriate movement of cargo-free motors on microtubules. Regulation must allow exquisite responses to dynamic spatial and temporal cues for cargo transport and allow for the selective recognition of a wide range of cargoes/adaptors that, ostensibly at least, may be quite different. It must also support bidirectional transport processes.A second multiprotein complex, dynactin³, helps to regulate cytoplasmic dynein 1. Indeed, dynactin is required for almost all known functions of cytoplasmic dynein. It is thought that dynactin plays a key role in attachment to cargo and promotes dynein activity. Despite this, its precise mechanism of action and the role of cargo attachment itself has remained unclear.Recently, a study by McKenney et al.⁴ in Science and a complimentary study by Schlager et al.⁵ in EMBO J, have taken crucial steps forward, uncovering a role for tripartite cargo adaptor-dynein-dynactin complexes in directly promoting dynein activity (Figure 1). Both of these studies utilize elegant biochemical purification coupled with the technical feat of high-resolution, single-molecule, multicolor TIRF microscopy to examine the properties of these assemblies as they move on labelled microtubules in vitro.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Schematic showing proposed organization of an active dynein-dynactin-cargo complex. Cargo (e.g., an endosome) couples to the motor complex via surface receptors (e.g., a Rab GTPases) that recruit specific adaptor proteins (e.g., BiCD2, Hook). These in turn recruit dynein/dynactin and stabilize their association, supporting the microtubule binding and processivity of the dynein-dynactin complex.McKenney et al.⁴ begin by showing that cytoplasmic dynein purified from rat brain (that is free from both dynactin and cargo proteins) binds to microtubules but does not engage in the processive long distance movements characteristic of motility in vivo. This implies that dynein requires activation. To isolate transport-active complexes, the authors use an alternative approach — affinity purification (from RPE-1 cells) via the cargo adaptor BicD2 (that couples dynein to Rab6-containing organelles). This yields stable associations of BicD2, dynein and dynactin, which when examined in TIRF motility assays, exhibit speeds and run lengths approaching those observed in vivo. Importantly, the authors reveal that these complexes consist of a single copy of dynein, dynactin and BicD2 (a dimer), demonstrating that the intrinsic processivity of the holoenzyme is directly enhanced and ruling out effects from cooperation between motor complexes in this system.The authors then ask which components of this tripartite complex are needed for dynein activation — is BicD2 required or is dynactin sufficient? They show that removal of BicD2 results in a loss of processive motility and dissociation of dynein from dynactin, demonstrating the importance of the cargo adaptor itself in formation of stable dynein-dynactin complexes and motility. Schlager et al.⁵ come to similar conclusions in their study using recombinant human dynein produced in baculovirus (an achievement in its own right), showing that purified dynactin is unable to activate motility in the absence of BicD2.To determine whether this mechanism is unique to BicD2 or whether it holds for other cargo adaptors, McKenney et al. expand their study to include three other adaptors — Rab11-FIP3 (for recycling endosomes), Spindly (kinetochores) and Hook (early endosomes). They show that all three can be used to purify dynein-dynactin and that those complexes are capable of processive motility in a manner comparable to those derived from BicD2 affinity purification.These studies thus highlight a crucial role for the cargo adaptor, coupled with dynactin, in dynein activation. This is somewhat reminiscent of several kinesin family proteins which exist in an inactive state in the absence of cargo⁶. In the future it will be important to understand why dynein is inactive in the absence of dynactin/cargo and what changes occur within the complex upon cargo adaptor/dynactin binding to cause its conversion to a processive motor. Clues may come from comparison with S. Cerevisiae dynein which appears constitutively active and may associate with dynactin in the absence of cargo⁷. It will also be important to determine the regulatory signals that control formation and dissociation of these active complexes, how they interact with other dynein regulators such as the Lis1-NudEL complex and how they are affected by the action of plus-end-directed motors associated with the same cargo.Further progress should also come from understanding of the structural and biophysical characteristics of the motor-cargo interfaces that we now know must ultimately drive dynein activation. Indeed, the fact that four distinct cargo adaptors can promote formation of transport-active complexes may imply the existence of common features in dynein-cargo adaptor recognition mechanisms that support activation. Importantly, the establishment of these elegant in vitro systems that recapitulate many of the properties of cytoplasmic dynein in vivo will now allow for a full molecular dissection of this ubiquitous and fascinating process.     

Dynein light intermediate chains maintain spindle bipolarity by functioning in centriole cohesion

Cytoplasmic dynein 1 (dynein) is a minus end–directed microtubule motor protein with many cellular functions, including during cell division. The role of the light intermediate chains (LICs; DYNC1LI1 and 2) within the complex is poorly understood. In this paper, we have used small interfering RNAs or morpholino oligonucleotides to deplete the LICs in human cell lines and Xenopus laevis early embryos to dissect the LICs’ role in cell division. We show that although dynein lacking LICs drives microtubule gliding at normal rates, the LICs are required for the formation and maintenance of a bipolar spindle. Multipolar spindles with poles that contain single centrioles were formed in cells lacking LICs, indicating that they are needed for maintaining centrosome integrity. The formation of multipolar spindles via centrosome splitting after LIC depletion could be rescued by inhibiting Eg5. This suggests a novel role for the dynein complex, counteracted by Eg5, in the maintenance of centriole cohesion during mitosis.     

Dynein light intermediate chain: an essential subunit that contributes to spindle checkpoint inactivation

The dynein light intermediate chain (LIC) is a subunit unique to the cytoplasmic form of dynein, but how it contributes to dynein function is not fully understood. Previous work has established that the LIC homodimer binds directly to the dynein heavy chain and may mediate the attachment of dynein to centrosomes and other cargoes. Here, we report our characterization of the LIC in Drosophila. Unlike vertebrates, in which two Lic genes encode multiple subunit isoforms, the Drosophila LIC is encoded by a single gene. We determined that the single LIC polypeptide is phosphorylated, and that different phosphoisoforms can assemble into the dynein motor complex. Our mutational analyses demonstrate that, similar to other dynein subunits, the Drosophila LIC is required for zygotic development, germline specification of the oocyte, and mitotic cell division. We show that RNA interference depletion of LIC in Drosophila S2 cells does not block the recruitment of a dynein complex to kinetochores, but it does delay inactivation of Mad2 signaling and mitotic progression. Our observations suggest the LIC contributes to a broad range of dynein functions.     

Dynein Light Intermediate Chain in Aspergillus nidulans Is Essential for the Interaction between Heavy and Intermediate Chains

Cytoplasmic dynein is a complex containing heavy chains (HCs), intermediate chains (ICs), light intermediate chains (LICs), and light chains (LCs). The HCs are responsible for motor activity. The ICs at the tail region of the motor interact with dynactin, which is essential for dynein function. However, functions of other subunits and how they contribute to the assembly of the core complex are not clearly defined. Here, we analyzed in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans functions of the only LIC and two LCs, RobA (Roadblock/LC7) and TctexA (Tctex1) in dynein-mediated nuclear distribution (nud). Whereas the deletion mutant of tctexA did not exhibit an apparent nud mutant phenotype, the deletion mutant of robA exhibited a nud phenotype at an elevated temperature, which is similar to the previously characterized nudG (LC8) deletion mutant. Remarkably, in contrast to the single mutants, the robA and nudG double deletion mutant exhibits a severe nud phenotype at various temperatures. Thus, functions of these two LC classes overlap to some extent, but the presence of both becomes important under specific conditions. The single LIC, however, is essential for dynein function in nuclear distribution. This is evidenced by the identification of the nudN gene as the LIC coding gene, and by the nud phenotype exhibited by the LIC down-regulating mutant, alcA-LIC. Without a functional LIC, the HC-IC association is significantly weakened, and the HCs could no longer accumulate at the microtubule plus end. Thus, the LIC is essential for the assembly of the core complex of dynein in Aspergillus.     

Different microtubule motors move early and late endocytic compartments

Important progress has been made during the past decade in the identification of molecular motors required in the distribution of early and late endosomes and the proper trafficking along the endocytic pathway. There is little direct evidence, however, that these motors drive movement of the endosomes. To evaluate the contributions of kinesin-1, dynein and kinesin-2 to the movement of early and late endosomes along microtubules, we made use of a cytosol-free motility assay using magnetically isolated early and late endosomes as well as biochemical analyses and live-cell imaging. By making use of specific antibodies, we confirmed that kinesin-1 and dynein move early endosomes and we found that kinesin-2 moves both early and late endosomes in the cell-free assay. Unexpectedly, dynein did not move late endosomes in the cell-free assay. We provide evidence from disruption of dynein function and latrunculin A treatment, suggesting that dynein regulates late endosome movement indirectly, possibly through a mechanism involving the actin cytoskeleton. These data provide new insights into the complex regulation of endosomes' motility and suggest that dynein is not the major motor required to move late endosomes toward the minus end of microtubules.