Crystallographic and modeling studies of RNase III suggest a mechanism for double-stranded RNA cleavage.

BACKGROUND: Aquifex aeolicus Ribonuclease III (Aa-RNase III) belongs to the family of Mg(2+)-dependent endonucleases that show specificity for double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). RNase III is conserved in all known bacteria and eukaryotes and has 1-2 copies of a 9-residue consensus sequence, known as the RNase III signature motif. The bacterial RNase III proteins are the simplest, consisting of two domains: an N-terminal endonuclease domain, followed by a double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD). The three-dimensional structure of the dsRBD in Escherichia coli RNase III has been elucidated; no structural information is available for the endonuclease domain of any RNase III. RESULTS: We present the crystal structures of the Aa-RNase III endonuclease domain in its ligand-free form and in complex with Mn(2+). The structures reveal a novel protein fold and suggest a mechanism for dsRNA cleavage. On the basis of structural, genetic, and biological data, we have constructed a hypothetical model of Aa-RNase III in complex with dsRNA and Mg(2+) ion, which provides the first glimpse of RNase III in action. CONCLUSIONS: The functional Aa-RNase III dimer is formed via mainly hydrophobic interactions, including a "ball-and-socket" junction that ensures accurate alignment of the two monomers. The fold of the polypeptide chain and its dimerization create a valley with two compound active centers at each end of the valley. The valley can accommodate a dsRNA substrate. Mn(2+) binding has significant impact on crystal packing, intermolecular interactions, thermal stability, and the formation of two RNA-cutting sites within each compound active center.     

Intermediate states of ribonuclease III in complex with double-stranded RNA

Bacterial ribonuclease III (RNase III) can affect RNA structure and gene expression in either of two ways: as a processing enzyme that cleaves double-stranded (ds) RNA, or as a binding protein that binds but does not cleave dsRNA. We previously proposed a model of the catalytic complex of RNase III with dsRNA based on three crystal structures, including the endonuclease domain of RNase III with and without bound metal ions and a dsRNA binding protein complexed with dsRNA. We also reported a noncatalytic assembly observed in the crystal structure of an RNase III mutant, which binds but does not cleave dsRNA, complexed with dsRNA. We hypothesize that the RNase III*dsRNA complex can exist in two functional forms, a catalytic complex and a noncatalytic assembly, and that in between the two forms there may be intermediate states. Here, we present four crystal structures of RNase III complexed with dsRNA, representing possible intermediates.     

The N-terminal domain that distinguishes yeast from bacterial RNase III contains a dimerization signal required for efficient double-stranded RNA cleavage

Yeast Rnt1 is a member of the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-specific RNase III family identified by conserved dsRNA binding (dsRBD) and nuclease domains. Comparative sequence analyses have revealed an additional N-terminal domain unique to the eukaryotic homologues of RNase III. The deletion of this domain from Rnt1 slowed growth and led to mild accumulation of unprocessed 25S pre-rRNA. In vitro, deletion of the N-terminal domain reduced the rate of RNA cleavage under physiological salt concentration. Size exclusion chromatography and cross-linking assays indicated that the N-terminal domain and the dsRBD self-interact to stabilize the Rnt1 homodimer. In addition, an interaction between the N-terminal domain and the dsRBD was identified by a two-hybrid assay. The results suggest that the eukaryotic N-terminal domain of Rnt1 ensures efficient dsRNA cleavage by mediating the assembly of optimum Rnt1-RNA ribonucleoprotein complex.     

NMR solution structure of a dsRNA binding domain from Drosophila staufen protein reveals homology to the N-terminal domain of ribosomal protein S5.

The double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD) is an approximately 65 amino acid motif that is found in a variety of proteins that interact with double-stranded (ds) RNA, such as Escherichia coli RNase III and the dsRNA-dependent kinase, PKR. Drosophila staufen protein contains five copies of this motif, and the third of these binds dsRNA in vitro. Using multinuclear/multidimensional NMR methods, we have determined that staufen dsRBD3 forms a compact protein domain with an alpha-beta-beta-beta-alpha structure in which the two alpha-helices lie on one face of a three-stranded anti-parallel beta-sheet. This structure is very similar to that of the N-terminal domain of a prokaryotic ribosomal protein S5. Furthermore, the consensus derived from all known S5p family sequences shares several conserved residues with the dsRBD consensus sequence, indicating that the two domains share a common evolutionary origin. Using in vitro mutagenesis, we have identified several surface residues which are important for the RNA binding of the dsRBD, and these all lie on the same side of the domain. Two residues that are essential for RNA binding, F32 and K50, are also conserved in the S5 protein family, suggesting that the two domains interact with RNA in a similar way.     

Characterization of Aquifex aeolicus ribonuclease III and the reactivity epitopes of its pre-ribosomal RNA substrates

Ribonuclease III cleaves double-stranded (ds) structures in bacterial RNAs and participates in diverse RNA maturation and decay pathways. Essential insight on the RNase III mechanism of dsRNA cleavage has been provided by crystallographic studies of the enzyme from the hyperthermophilic bacterium, Aquifex aeolicus. However, the biochemical properties of A. aeolicus (Aa)-RNase III and the reactivity epitopes of its substrates are not known. The catalytic activity of purified recombinant Aa-RNase III exhibits a temperature optimum of ～70-85°C, with either Mg2+ or Mn2+ supporting efficient catalysis. Small hairpins based on the stem structures associated with the Aquifex 16S and 23S rRNA precursors are cleaved at sites that are consistent with production of the immediate precursors to the mature rRNAs. Substrate reactivity is independent of the distal box sequence, but is strongly dependent on the proximal box sequence. Structural studies have shown that a conserved glutamine (Q157) in the Aa-RNase III dsRNA-binding domain (dsRBD) directly interacts with a proximal box base pair. Aa-RNase III cleavage of the pre-16S substrate is blocked by the Q157A mutation, which reflects a loss of substrate binding affinity. Thus, a highly conserved dsRBD-substrate interaction plays an important role in substrate recognition by bacterial RNase III.     

Biochemical and genomic analysis of substrate recognition by the double-stranded RNA binding domain of yeast RNase III

Members of the RNase III family of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) endonucleases are important enzymes of RNA metabolism in eukaryotic cells. Rnt1p is the only known member of the RNase III family of endonucleases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Previous studies have shown that Rnt1p cleaves dsRNA capped by a conserved AGNN tetraloop motif, which is a major determinant for Rnt1p binding and cleavage. The solution structure of the dsRNA-binding domain (dsRBD) of Rnt1p bound to a cognate RNA substrate revealed the structural basis for binding of the conserved tetraloop motif by alpha-helix 1 of the dsRBD. In this study, we have analyzed extensively the effects of mutations of helix 1 residues that contact the RNA. We show, using microarray analysis, that mutations of these amino acids induce substrate-specific processing defects in vivo. Cleavage kinetics and binding studies show that these mutations affect RNA cleavage and binding in vitro to different extents and suggest a function for some specific amino acids of the dsRBD in the catalytic positioning of the enzyme. Moreover, we show that 2'-hydroxyl groups of nucleotides of the tetraloop or adjacent base pairs predicted to interact with residues of alpha-helix 1 are important for Rnt1p cleavage in vitro. This study underscores the importance of a few amino acid contacts for positioning of a dsRBD onto its RNA target, and implicates the specific orientation of helix 1 on the RNA for proper positioning of the catalytic domain.     

Molecular basis of double-stranded RNA-protein interactions: structure of a dsRNA-binding domain complexed with dsRNA.

Protein interactions with double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) are critical for many cell processes; however, in contrast to protein-dsDNA interactions, surprisingly little is known about the molecular basis of protein-dsRNA interactions. A large and diverse class of proteins that bind dsRNA do so by utilizing an approximately 70 amino acid motif referred to as the dsRNA-binding domain (dsRBD). We have determined a 1.9 A resolution crystal structure of the second dsRBD of Xenopus laevis RNA-binding protein A complexed with dsRNA. The structure shows that the protein spans 16 bp of dsRNA, interacting with two successive minor grooves and across the intervening major groove on one face of a primarily A-form RNA helix. The nature of these interactions explains dsRBD specificity for dsRNA (over ssRNA or dsDNA) and the apparent lack of sequence specificity. Interestingly, the dsRBD fold resembles a portion of the conserved core structure of a family of polynucleotidyl transferases that includes RuvC, MuA transposase, retroviral integrase and RNase H. Structural comparisons of the dsRBD-dsRNA complex and models proposed for polynucleotidyl transferase-nucleic acid complexes suggest that similarities in nucleic acid binding also exist between these families of proteins.     

Structural and mechanistic insight into stem‐loop RNA processing by yeast Pichia stipitis Dicer

Dicer is a member of the ribonuclease III enzyme family and processes double‐stranded RNA into small functional RNAs. The variation in the domain architecture of Dicer among different species whilst preserving its biological dicing function is intriguing. Here, we describe the structure and function of a novel catalytically active RNase III protein, a non‐canonical Dicer (PsDCR1), found in budding yeast Pichia stipitis. The structure of the catalytically active region (the catalytic RNase III domain and double‐stranded RNA‐binding domain 1 [dsRBD1]) of DCR1 showed that RNaseIII domain is structurally similar to yeast RNase III (Rnt1p) but uniquely presents dsRBD1 in a diagonal orientation, forming a catalytic core made of homodimer and large RNA‐binding surface. The second dsRNA binding domain at C‐terminus, which is absent in Rnt1, enhances the RNA cleavage activity. Although the cleavage pattern of PsDCR1 anchors an apical loop similar to Rnt1, the cleavage activity depended on the sequence motif at the lower stem, not the apical loop, of hairpin RNA. Through RNA sequencing and RNA mutations, we showed that RNA cleavage by PsDCR1 is determined by the stem‐loop structure of the RNA substrate, suggesting the possibility that stem‐loop RNA‐guided gene silencing pathway exists in budding yeast.     

Dicer 的结构功能及其与肿瘤的关系

Dicer蛋白是RNaseⅢ家族中重要的一员,对miRNA或siRNA的产生起着至关重要的作用。Dicer蛋白通常由1个DEXH盒子或H盒子、1个DUF283结构域、1个PAZ结构域、2个RNaseⅢ结构域(RNaseⅢa和RNaseⅢb)和1个dsRNA结合结构域组成。Dicer蛋白的分子结构决定了其在miRNAs合成中发挥着重要作用。Dicer及生成的miRNA与肿瘤又有着密切关系。本文主要针对Dicer及其与肿瘤的关系作简要综述。     

Both N-terminal catalytic and C-terminal RNA binding domain contribute to substrate specificity and cleavage site selection of RNase III.

The double-stranded RNA-specific endoribonuclease III (RNase III) of bacteria consists of an N-terminal nuclease domain and a double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD) at the C-terminus. Analysis of two hybrid proteins consisting of the N-terminal half of Escherichia coli RNase III fused to the dsRBD of the Rhodobacter capsulatus enzyme and vice versa reveals that both domains in combination with the particular substrate determine substrate specificity and cleavage site selection. Extension of the spacer between the two domains of the E. coli enzyme from nine to 20 amino acids did not affect cleavage site selection.     

Ethidium-dependent uncoupling of substrate binding and cleavage by Escherichia coli ribonuclease III

Ethidium bromide (EB) is known to inhibit cleavage of bacterial rRNA precursors by Escherichia coli ribonuclease III, a dsRNA-specific nuclease. The mechanism of EB inhibition of RNase III is not known nor is there information on EB-binding sites in RNase III substrates. We show here that EB is a reversible, apparently competitive inhibitor of RNase III cleavage of small model substrates in vitro. Inhibition is due to intercalation, since (i) the inhibitory concentrations of EB are similar to measured EB intercalation affinities; (ii) substrate cleavage is not affected by actinomycin D, an intercalating agent that does not bind dsRNA; (iii) the EB concentration dependence of inhibition is a function of substrate structure. In contrast, EB does not strongly inhibit the ability of RNase III to bind substrate. EB also does not block substrate binding by the C-terminal dsRNA-binding domain (dsRBD) of RNase III, indicating that EB perturbs substrate recognition by the N-terminal catalytic domain. Laser photocleavage experiments revealed two ethidium-binding sites in the substrate R1.1 RNA. One site is in the internal loop, adjacent to the scissile bond, while the second site is in the lower stem. Both sites consist of an A-A pair stacked on a CG pair, a motif which apparently provides a particularly favorable environment for intercalation. These results indicate an inhibitory mechanism in which EB site-specifically binds substrate, creating a cleavage-resistant complex that can compete with free substrate for RNase III. This study also shows that RNase III recognition and cleavage of substrate can be uncoupled and supports an enzymatic mechanism of dsRNA cleavage involving cooperative but not obligatorily linked actions of the dsRBD and the catalytic domain.     

Identification and analysis of the rnc gene for RNase III in Rhodobacter capsulatus.

The large subunit ribosomal RNA of the purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus shows fragmentation into pieces of 14 and 16S, both fragments forming the functional equivalent of intact 23S rRNA. An RNA-processing step removes an extra stem-loop structure from the 23S rRNA [Kordes, E., Jock, S., Fritsch, J., Bosch, F. and Klug, G. (1994) J. Bacteriol., 176, 1121-1127]. Taking advantage of the fragmentation deficient mutant strain Fm65, we used genetic complementation to find the mutated gene responsible for this aberration. It was identified as the Rhodobacter homologue to mc from Escherichia coli encoding endoribonuclease III (RNase III). The predicted protein has 226 amino acids with a molecular weight of 25.5 kDa. It shares high homology with other known RNase III enzymes over the full length. In particular it shows the double-stranded RNA-binding domain (dsRBD) motif essential for binding of dsRNA substrates. The Fm65 mutant has a frame shift mutation resulting in complete loss of the dsRBD rendering the enzyme inactive. The cloned Rhodobacter enzyme can substitute RNase III activity in an RNase III deficient E. coli strain. Contrary to E. coli, the Rhodobacter mc is in one operon together with the lep gene encoding the leader peptidase.     

Molecular requirements for duplex recognition and cleavage by eukaryotic RNase III: discovery of an RNA-dependent DNA cleavage activity of yeast Rnt1p

Members of the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) specific RNase III family are known to use a conserved dsRNA-binding domain (dsRBD) to distinguish RNA A-form helices from DNA B-form ones, however, the basis of this selectivity and its effect on cleavage specificity remain unknown. Here, we directly examine the molecular requirements for dsRNA recognition and cleavage by the budding yeast RNase III (Rnt1p), and compare it to both bacterial RNase III and fission yeast RNase III (Pac1). We synthesized substrates with either chemically modified nucleotides near the cleavage sites, or with different DNA/RNA combinations, and investigated their binding and cleavage by Rnt1p. Substitution for the ribonucleotide vicinal to the scissile phosphodiester linkage with 2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-beta-d-ribose (2' F-RNA), a deoxyribonucleotide, or a 2'-O-methylribonucleotide permitted cleavage by Rnt1p, while the introduction of a 2', 5'-phosphodiester linkage permitted binding, but not cleavage. This indicates that the position of the phosphodiester link with respect to the nuclease domain, and not the 2'-OH group, is critical for cleavage by Rnt1p. Surprisingly, Rnt1p bound to a DNA helix capped with an NGNN tetraribonucleotide loop indicating that the binding of at least one member of the RNase III family is not restricted to RNA. The results also suggest that the dsRBD may accommodate B-form DNA duplexes. Interestingly, Rnt1p, but not Pac1 nor bacterial RNase III, cleaved the DNA strand of a DNA/RNA hybrid, indicating that A-form RNA helix is not essential for cleavage by Rnt1p. In contrast, RNA/DNA hybrids bound to, but were not cleaved by Rnt1p, underscoring the critical role for the nucleotide located at 3' end of the tetraloop and suggesting an asymmetrical mode of substrate recognition. In cell extracts, the native enzyme effectively cleaved the DNA/RNA hybrid, indicating much broader Rnt1p substrate specificity than previously thought. The discovery of this novel RNA-dependent deoxyribonuclease activity has potential implications in devising new antiviral strategies that target actively transcribed DNA.     

Intrinsic double-stranded-RNA processing activity of Escherichia coli ribonuclease III lacking the dsRNA-binding domain.

The ribonuclease III superfamily represents a structurally related group of double-strand (ds) specific endoribonucleases which play key roles in diverse prokaryotic and eukaryotic RNA maturation and degradation pathways. A dsRNA-binding domain (dsRBD) is a conserved feature of the superfamily and is important for substrate recognition. RNase III family members also exhibit a "catalytic" domain, in part defined by a set of highly conserved amino acids, of which at least one (a glutamic acid) is important for cleavage but not for substrate binding. However, it is not known whether the catalytic domain requires the dsRBD for activity. This report shows that a truncated form of Escherichia coli RNase III lacking the dsRBD (RNase III[DeltadsRBD]) can accurately cleave small processing substrates in vitro. Optimal activity of RNase III[DeltadsRBD] is observed at low salt concentrations (<60 mM Na(+)), either in the presence of Mg(2+) (>25 mM) or Mn(2+) ( approximately 5 mM). At 60 mM Na(+) and 5 mM Mn(2+) the catalytic efficiency of RNase III[DeltadsRBD] is similar to that of RNase III at physiological salt concentrations and Mg(2+). In the presence of Mg(2+) RNase III[DeltadsRBD] is less efficient than the wild-type enzyme, due to a higher K(m). Similar to RNase III, RNase III[DeltadsRBD] is inhibited by high concentrations of Mn(2+), which is due to metal ion occupancy of an inhibitory site on the enzyme. RNase III[DeltadsRBD] retains strict specificity for dsRNA, as indicated by its inability to cleave (rA)(25), (rU)(25), or (rC)(25). Moreover, dsDNA, ssDNA, or an RNA-DNA hybrid are not cleaved. Low (micromolar) concentrations of ethidium bromide block RNase III[DeltadsRBD] cleavage of substrate, which is similar to the inhibition seen with RNase III and is indicative of an intercalative mode of inhibition. Finally, RNase III[DeltadsRBD] is sensitive to specific Watson-Crick base-pair substitutions which also inhibit RNase III. These findings support an RNase III mechanism of action in which the catalytic domain (i) can function independently of the dsRBD, (ii) is dsRNA-specific, and (iii) participates in cleavage site selection.     

The Role of Human Dicer-dsRBD in Processing Small Regulatory RNAs

One of the most exciting recent developments in RNA biology has been the discovery of small non-coding RNAs that affect gene expression through the RNA interference (RNAi) mechanism. Two major classes of RNAs involved in RNAi are small interfering RNA (siRNA) and microRNA (miRNA). Dicer, an RNase III enzyme, plays a central role in the RNAi pathway by cleaving precursors of both of these classes of RNAs to form mature siRNAs and miRNAs, which are then loaded into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). miRNA and siRNA precursors are quite structurally distinct; miRNA precursors are short, imperfect hairpins while siRNA precursors are long, perfect duplexes. Nonetheless, Dicer is able to process both. Dicer, like the majority of RNase III enzymes, contains a dsRNA binding domain (dsRBD), but the data are sparse on the exact role this domain plays in the mechanism of Dicer binding and cleavage. To further explore the role of human Dicer-dsRBD in the RNAi pathway, we determined its binding affinity to various RNAs modeling both miRNA and siRNA precursors. Our study shows that Dicer-dsRBD is an avid binder of dsRNA, but its binding is only minimally influenced by a single-stranded – double-stranded junction caused by large terminal loops observed in miRNA precursors. Thus, the Dicer-dsRBD contributes directly to substrate binding but not to the mechanism of differentiating between pre-miRNA and pre-siRNA. In addition, NMR spin relaxation and MD simulations provide an overview of the role that dynamics contribute to the binding mechanism. We compare this current study with our previous studies of the dsRBDs from Drosha and DGCR8 to give a dynamic profile of dsRBDs in their apo-state and a mechanistic view of dsRNA binding by dsRBDs in general.     

Structures of the first and second double-stranded RNA-binding domains of human TAR RNA-binding protein

The TAR RNA-binding Protein (TRBP) is a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-binding protein, which binds to Dicer and is required for the RNA interference pathway. TRBP consists of three dsRNA-binding domains (dsRBDs). The first and second dsRBDs (dsRBD1 and dsRBD2, respectively) have affinities for dsRNA, whereas the third dsRBD (dsRBD3) binds to Dicer. In this study, we prepared the single domain fragments of human TRBP corresponding to dsRBD1 and dsRBD2 and solved the crystal structure of dsRBD1 and the solution structure of dsRBD2. The two structures contain an α-β-β-β-α fold, which is common to the dsRBDs. The overall structures of dsRBD1 and dsRBD2 are similar to each other, except for a slight shift of the first α helix. The residues involved in dsRNA binding are conserved. We examined the small interfering RNA (siRNA)-binding properties of these dsRBDs by isothermal titration colorimetry measurements. The dsRBD1 and dsRBD2 fragments both bound to siRNA, with dissociation constants of 220 and 113 nM, respectively. In contrast, the full-length TRBP and its fragment with dsRBD1 and dsRBD2 exhibited much smaller dissociation constants (0.24 and 0.25 nM, respectively), indicating that the tandem dsRBDs bind simultaneously to one siRNA molecule. On the other hand, the loop between the first α helix and the first β strand of dsRBD2, but not dsRBD1, has a Trp residue, which forms hydrophobic and cation-π interactions with the surrounding residues. A circular dichroism analysis revealed that the thermal stability of dsRBD2 is higher than that of dsRBD1 and depends on the Trp residue.     

Dynamic origins of differential RNA binding function in two dsRBDs from the miRNA "microprocessor" complex

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) affect gene regulation by base pairing with mRNA and contribute to the control of cellular homeostasis. The first step in miRNA maturation is conducted in the nucleus by the "microprocessor" complex made up of an RNase III enzyme, Drosha, that contains one dsRNA binding domain (dsRBD), and DGCR8, that contains two dsRBDs in tandem. The crystal structure of DGCR8-Core (493-720), containing both dsRBDs, and the NMR solution structure of Drosha-dsRBD (1259-1337) have been reported, but the solution dynamics have not been explored for any of these dsRBDs. To better define the mechanism of dsRNA binding and thus the nuclear maturation step of miRNA processing, we report NMR spin relaxation and MD simulations of Drosha-dsRBD (1259-1337) and DGCR8-dsRBD1 (505-583). The study was motivated by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) of the two dsRBDs, which showed that Drosha-dsRBD does not bind a representative miRNA but isolated DGCR8-dsRBD1 does (K(d) = 9.4 ± 0.4 μM). Our results show that loop 2 in both dsRBDs is highly dynamic but the pattern of the correlations observed in MD is different for the two proteins. Additionally, the extended loop 1 of Drosha-dsRBD is more flexible than the corresponding loop in DGCR8-dsRBD1 but shows no correlation with loop 2, which potentially explains the lack of dsRNA binding by Drosha-dsRBD in the absence of the RNase III domains. The results presented in this study provide key structural and dynamic features of dsRBDs that contribute to the binding mechanism of these domains to dsRNA.