Durability of Effects of Exenatide Treatment on Glycemic Control,Body Weight,Systolic Blood Pressure,C-Reactive Protein,and Triglyceride Concentrations

ObjectiveTo determine (1) whether long-term treatment with exenatide is associated with reductions in C-reactive protein (CRP), systolic blood pressure (BP), and triglyceride concentrations in addition to reductions in body weight and hemoglobin A1c (A1C) levels and (2) whether these beneficial results persist without any loss of effect while exenatide is being used, and whether they reverse after its cessation.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 141 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with exenatide at a tertiary clinic.ResultsExenatide (mean duration of treatment, 1.4 years) decreased A1C (0.7%), weight (5 kg), systolic BP (8 mm Hg), and triglyceride concentrations (46 mg/dL) (P < .05 for all). Sixty-one patients continued exenatide therapy throughout the study (mean duration of use, 2.4 years). Exenatide treatment reduced their mean weight by 7 kg, systolic BP by 8 mm Hg, triglycerides by 52 mg/dL, A1C by 1.3%, and CRP by 2.4 mg/L (P < .05 for all). Reductions in systolic BP and CRP were not related to weight loss. The reduction in CRP concentration was significantly related to the baseline CRP concentration (r = 0.78; P < .001) and to change in A1C (r = 0.68; P = .02). Patients who stopped taking exenatide had a reversal of the benefits within 6 months after cessation of treatment.Conclusion:Exenatide treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes has durable and persistent beneficial effects on A1C, weight, CRP, systolic BP, and triglyceride concentrations. Cessation of treatment reverses all these beneficial effects within 6 months. There was no evidence of loss of its effects while exenatide treatment was continued. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:192-200)     

Liraglutide as Additional Treatment to Insulin in Obese Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveBecause approximately 40% of patients with type 1 diabetes have the metabolic syndrome, we tested the hypothesis that addition of liraglutide to insulin in obese patients with type 1 diabetes will result in an improvement in plasma glucose concentrations, a reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), a fall in systolic blood pressure, and weight loss.MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of data obtained from 27 obese patients with type 1 diabetes treated with liraglutide in addition to insulin. Patients were also treated for hypertension. Paired t tests were used to compare the changes in HbA1c, insulin doses, body weight, body mass index, 4-week mean blood glucose concentrations (28-day insulin pump mean blood glucose), blood pressure, and lipid parameters prior to and 180 ± 14 days after liraglutide therapy.ResultsMean glucose concentrations fell from 191 ± 6 to 170 ± 6 mg/dL (P = .002). HbA1c fell from 7.89 ± 0.13% to 7.46 ± 0.13% (P = .001), without an increase in frequency of hypoglycemia. Mean body weight fell from 96.20 ± 3.68 kg to 91.56 ± 3.78 kg (P<.0001). Daily total and bolus doses of insulin fell from 73 ± 6 to 60 ± 4 (P = .008) units and from 40 ± 5 to 29 ± 3 units (P = .011), respectively. Mean systolic blood pressure fell from 130 ± 3 to 120 ± 4 mm Hg (P = .020).ConclusionAddition of liraglutide to insulin in obese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus leads to improvements in glycemic control and HbA1c and to reductions in insulin dose, systolic blood pressure, and body weight. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:963-967)     

Exenatide Therapy in Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Insulin

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of exenatide on clinical parameters in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose hyperglycemia is not adequately controlled despite treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, clinical progress of 52 obese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide, 5 mcg twice daily, in an outpatient setting was reviewed. Treatment initiation was between September and December 2005. Mean follow-up period was 26 weeks. Thirty-eight patients took exenatide regularly (Group A); 14 patients discontinued exenatide because of insurance, personal, or economic reasons (Group B). Measurements at baseline and at follow-up included body weight; blood pressure; and levels of hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and plasma lipids. Insulin dosage requirements were assessed.ResultsMean body weight (± standard error of the mean) decreased by 6.46 ± 0.8 kg (P < .001) in Group A and increased by 2.4 ± 0.6 kg in Group B (P < .001). In Group A, mean HbA_1c decreased by 0.6 ± 0.21% (P = .007), and the insulin dosage requirement decreased for rapid-acting and mixed insulins (P < .02). In Group A, means of the following parameters decreased: serum total cholesterol by 8.5 ± 3.3% (P = .03), triglycerides by 26 ± 7.6% (P = .01), systolic blood pressure by 9.2 ± 3.3 mm Hg (P = .02), and high-sensitivity CRP by 34 ± 14.3% (P = .05). These indices did not change in Group B.ConclusionExenatide effectively treats obese patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin, leading to weight loss and reduction in levels of HbA_lc, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and high-sensitivity CRP. (Endocr Pract 2007;13:444-450)     

Liraglutide Achieves A1C Targets More often than Sitagliptin or Exenatide when Added to Metformin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and a Baseline A1C <8.0%

ObjectiveCompare the safety and efficacy of liraglutide to that of sitagliptin or exenatide as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and glycated hemoglobin (A1C) <8.0%.MethodsPost hoc analysis of 26-week data from liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily (OD) versus exenatide 10 μg twice daily (LEAD-6) and liraglutide 1.8 mg OD versus sitagliptin 100 mg OD (LIRA-DPP-4); only patients treated as add-on to metformin with baseline A1C <8.0% were included. Efficacy analysis was performed on the intention-to-treat population with missing values imputed by last observation carried forward.ResultsMore patients achieved A1C targets (<7.0% and ≤6.5%) with liraglutide versus exenatide or sitagliptin; the difference was greatest for A1C ≤6.5% (LEAD-6: 65% versus 35%; odds ratio [OR]=3.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-8.63; P = .01 or LIRA-DPP-4: 53% versus 19%; OR = 4.78, 95% CI 2.10 to 10.87; P = .0002). Significantly more patients achieved a composite endpoint of A1C <7.0% with no weight gain or hypoglycemia with liraglutide compared with exenatide (78% versus 42%; OR = 4.99, 95% CI: 1.77 to 14.04; P = .0023) or sitagliptin (61% versus 21%; OR = 5.95, 95% CI: 2.66 to 13.29; P<.0001). All treatments were well tolerated, there was no major hypoglycemia and few patients (8 to 10%) experienced minor hypoglycemia.ConclusionWhen added to metformin in patients with an A1C <8.0%, more patients using liraglutide 1.8 mg reached A1C targets than with exenatide or sitagliptin. Sitagliptin had particularly low efficacy in this analysis. These data support the use of liraglutide 1.8 mg as a safe and effective alternative to sitagliptin or exenatide following metformin failure in patients with an A1C <8.0%. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:64-72)     

Diurnal Glucose Patterns of Exenatide Once Weekly: A 1-Year Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring with Ambulatory Glucose Profile Analysis

ObjectiveTo use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to characterize diurnal glucose patterns produced by a novel formulation of exenatide consisting of biodegradable polymeric microspheres that entrap exenatide and provide extended release enabling once-weekly administration.MethodsWe performed a subgroup analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes who participated in a multicenter trial (DURATION-1: Effects of Exenatide Long- Acting Release on Glucose Control and Safety in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) comparing once-weekly with twice-daily formulations of exenatide. We are the only center to use CGM with ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) analysis to characterize glucose exposure, variability, and stability in participants assigned to exenatide once weekly.ResultsSeven of the 303 patients in the larger study population were included in the subgroup analysis. Mean age (57.6 ± 7 years), weight (102 ± 17 kg), body mass index (34 ± 3 kg/m²), and duration of diabetes (5 ± 2 years) were comparable to characteristics of the larger study population. At 30 weeks and 52 weeks, participants treated with exenatide once weekly had a mean reduction in hemoglobin A_1c level of 1.3 ± 0.3% and 1.0 ± 0.3%, respectively (P < .05). CGM analysis revealed a significant (P < .01) decrease in diurnal glucose exposure for 4 participants during nocturnal and daytime periods. Excess glucose exposure (compared with reference values) decreased in 6 of 7 participants, as did glucose variability. Glucose stability improved in 5 participants. The percentage of glucose values less than 70 mg/dL initially increased during the first half of the study then decreased to baseline levels by study end.ConclusionsIndividual glucose profiles revealed that changes in hemoglobin A_1c did not consistently parallel alterations in glucose exposure, variability, and stability. AGPs provided a visual representation of improved glucose responses to exenatide once weekly. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:326-334)     

Nordic Walking Improves Cardiometabolic Parameters,Fitness Performance,and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of Nordic walking (NW) on cardiometabolic health, physical performance, and well-being in sedentary older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).MethodsFifteen subjects with T2D (female, 5; male, 10; age, 65 ± 6.2 years [mean ± standard deviation]; body mass index, 27.3 ± 4.9 kg/m² [mean ± standard deviation]) were enrolled in a 6-month NW training program. The fasting glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin levels, lipid profile (total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressures were measured before and after the intervention. Participants’ quality of life (Short-Form Health Survey) and physical fitness (6-minute walking test) were also evaluated.ResultsCompared with baseline, NW significantly improved the fasting glucose level (103.5 ± 18.5 vs 168.7 ± 37.7 mg/dL, P = .01), SBP (121.8 ± 12.2 vs 133 ± 14.4 mm Hg, P = .02), physical fitness (759.88 ± 69 vs 615.5 ± 62.6 m, P < .001), and both mental health (54.5 ± 4.4 vs 45.7 ± 5.6, P < .01) and physical health (49.8 ± 4.7 vs 40.3 ± 5.9, P < .01). The levels of glycosylated hemoglobin (6.15% ± 0.8% vs 6.4% ± 1%, P = .46), total cholesterol (162.2 ± 31.2 vs 175.5 ± 28.8 mg/dL, P = .13), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (95.2 ± 24.2 vs 106.3 ± 32.3 mg/dL, P = .43), and triglycerides (135.5 ± 60.8 vs 127.6 ± 57.4 mg/dL, P = 0.26) improved without reaching significance.ConclusionNW training improved the glycemic levels, SBP, physical fitness, and perception of quality of life in older adults with T2D. NW represents a suitable complementary strategy to improve the global health status in this population.     

Comparison of the Effect of Insulin Glulisine to Insulin Aspart on Breakfast Postprandial Blood Glucose Levels in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus on Multiple Daily Injections

ObjectiveRapid-acting insulins, including insulin aspart (NovoLog) and lispro (Humalog), do not seem to effectively control postprandial glycemic excursions in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The objective of this study was to determine if insulin glulisine (Apidra), another rapid-acting insulin analog, would be superior in controlling postprandial hyperglycemia in children with T1DM.MethodsThirteen prepubertal children ages 4 to 11 years completed this study. Inclusion criteria included T1DM ≥6 months, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlC) 6.9 to 10%, blood glucose (BG) levels in adequate control for 1 week prior to study start, multiple daily injections (MDI) with insulin glargine or determir once daily and aspart or lispro premeal. If fasting BG was 70 to 180 mg/dL, subjects received insulin glulisine alternating with aspart prior to a prescribed breakfast with a fixed amount of carbohydrate (45, 60, or 75 g) for 20 days. Postprandial BG values were obtained at 2 and 4 hours.ResultsMean baseline BG values for insulin glulisine (136.4 ± 15.7 mg/dL; mean ± SD) and aspart (133.4 ± 14.7 mg/dL) were similar (P = .34). Mean increase in 2-hour postprandial BG was higher in glulisine (+113.5 ± 65.2 mg/dL) than aspart (+98.6 ± 66.9 mg/dL), (P = .01). BG remained higher at 4 hours (glulisine: 141.9 ± 36.5 mg/ dL, aspart: 129.0 ± 37.0 mg/dL) (P = .04). Although statistically insignificant, more hypoglycemic events occurred at 2-and 4-hours postprandial with insulin aspart.ConclusionInsulin aspart appears to be more effective than insulin glulisine in controlling 2-and 4-hour postprandial BG excursions in prepubertal children with T1DM. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:614-619)     

Clinical Outcomes Using Long-Term Combination Therapy with Insulin Glargine and Exenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo examine the long-term effects of combination insulin glargine/exenatide treatment on glycemic control.MethodsWe conducted a 24-month retrospective US chart review of patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) levels > 7.0% for whom glargine and exenatide were coprescribed in differing order (glargine added after exenatide [exenatide/glargine]; exenatide added after glargine [glargine/exenatide]). Treatment order groups were combined to form a pooled treatment group. Changes from baseline in A1C, patients with A1C ≤ 7.0%, body weight, glargine/exenatide daily dose, oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) use, and hypoglycemia were evaluated.ResultsTreatment groups were similar at baseline; however, patients in the glargine/exenatide group (n = 121) (vs exenatide/glargine group [n = 44]) had longer disease duration (11.8 vs 8.0 years) and took fewer OADs (1.7 vs 2.3). Overall, baseline A1C was 8.8 ± 1.3% and weight was 109.5 ± 25.3 kg. Significant A1C reductions emerged at month 6 and persisted throughout 24 months (vs baseline) in both treatment groups (pooled: –0.7 ± 1.6; P < .001), and 33.0% of patients achieved an A1C level ≤ 7.0%. After 24 months of exenatide/glargine, body weight remained unchanged (0.7 ± 8.3 kg; P = .640). With glargine/exenatide, body weight decreased (–2.5 ± 6.7 kg; P = .001). At month 24, daily glargine dose was 0.40 ± 0.23 units/kg for the exenatide/glargine group and 0.47 ± 0.30 units/kg for the glargine/exenatide group. Hypoglycemia frequency was similar in both treatment groups.ConclusionsRegardless of treatment order, long-term combined therapy with glargine and exenatide for up to 24 months in patients with inadequately controlled T2DM suggests reduction of A1C without significant weight gain or increased hypoglycemia risk. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:17-25)     

Management of Hyperglycemia with the Administration of Intravenous Exenatide to Patients in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of intravenous exenatide to control hyperglycemia in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU).MethodsA prospective, single-center, open-label, nonrandomized pilot study. Forty patients admitted to the CICU with glucose levels of 140 to 400 mg/dL received intravenous exenatide as a bolus followed by a fixed dose infusion for up to 48 hours. Exenatide effectiveness was benchmarked to two historical insulin infusion cohorts, one (INT) with a target glucose of 90 to 119 mg/dL (n = 84) and the other (MOD) with a target of 100 to 140 mg/dL (n = 71).ResultsMedian admission glucose values were 185.5 mg/dL (161.0, 215.5), 259.0 mg/dL (206.0, 343.0), and 189.5 mg/dL (163.5, 245.0) in the exenatide, MOD, and INT groups, respectively (P<.001). Steady state glucose values were similar between the exenatide (132.0 mg/dL [110.0, 157.0]) and the MOD groups (127.0 mg/dL [105.0, P = .15), but lower in the INT group (105.0 mg/dL [92.0, 128.0], P<.001 for exenatide versus INT). Median (IQR) time to steady state was 2.0 hours (1.5, 5.0) in the exenatide group compared to 12.0 hours (7.0, 15.0) in the MOD group (P<.001) and 3.0 hours (1.0, 5.0) in the INT group (P = .80 for exenatide versus INT). Exenatide was discontinued in 3 patients after failure to achieve glycemic control. No episodes of severe hypoglycemia (<50 mg/dL) occurred in patients who received exenatide. Nausea was reported by 16 patients and vomiting by 2 patients.ConclusionIntravenous exenatide is effective in lowering glucose levels in CICU patients, but its use may be limited by nausea. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:81-90)     

Association of Lower Serum Cholesterol Levels with Higher Risk of Osteoporosis in Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo determine whether a correlation exists between bone mineral density and circulating lipoprotein levels and whether these variables are independently associated with osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.MethodsIn a cross-sectional analysis, 159 patients with type 2 diabetes were compared with 70 patients without diabetes selected from an outpatient endocrinology clinic in a tertiary care institute during a 1-year period. Variables were gathered through history, physical examination, and laboratory findings, including blood chemistry studies and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.ResultsOf the 229 study patients, 86 (37.6%) had osteoporosis. In the patients with diabetes, the mean ± SD of age, weight, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in those with and without osteoporosis was 72.3 ± 10.4 years versus 63.6 ± 11.0 years, 74.2 ± 14.4 kg versus 83.7 ± 15.5 kg, 178.4 ± 33.7 mg/dL versus 194.1 ± 33.9 mg/dL, and 100.0 ± 27.1 mg/dL versus 114.2 ± 30.2 mg/dL, respectively (P < 0.01 for all variables). After adjustment for other variables, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of diabetes was associated with a lower risk of osteoporosis. Similarly, older age and lower body weight, LDL levels, and serum calcium levels were independently associated with lumbar spine osteoporosis in patients with diabetes, in comparison with older age and lower weight in patients without diabetes. Lower weight and older age were associated with femoral neck and total hip osteoporosis in patients with diabetes, in comparison with only older age in patients without diabetes.ConclusionThe presence of type 2 diabetes is associated with a lower risk of osteoporosis. In patients with type 2 diabetes, a lower LDL level is more likely to be associated with osteoporosis at the lumbar spine. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:620-628)     

Clinical effects of long-term metreleptin treatment in patients with lipodystrophy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term clinical effect of treatment with metreleptin (an analogue of human leptin) on glycemic and lipid abnormalities and markers of hepatic steatosis in patients with inherited or acquired lipodystrophy.MethodsFifty-five patients (36 with generalized lipodystrophy and 19 with partial lipodystrophy) with at least 1 of 3 metabolic abnormalities (diabetes mellitus, fasting triglyceride level ≥ 200 mg/dL, and insulin resistance) and low leptin levels received subcutaneous injections of metreleptin once or twice daily in an ongoing clinical trial at the National Institutes of Health.ResultsAt baseline, hemoglobin A_1c-8.5% ± 2.1% (mean ± standard deviation [SD])-and triglycerides—479 ± 80 mg/dL (geometric mean ± standard error [SE])-were substantially elevated. Robust and sustained reductions in both variables were evident for the observed patient population during a 3-year metreleptin treatment period (-2.1% ± 0.5% [mean ± SE] and -35.4% ± 13.7% [mean ± SE], respectively). Mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were elevated at baseline (100 ± 120 U/L and 71 ± 77 U/L [mean ± SD], respectively) and decreased by -45 ± 19 U/L and -33 ± 14 U/L (mean ± SE), respectively, during the 3-year metreleptin treatment period. Improvements in hemoglobin A_1c, triglycerides, ALT, and AST were more pronounced in the subsets of patients having elevated levels at baseline. The most notable adverse events observed in this patient population were likely attributable to underlying metabolic abnormalities or comorbidities.ConclusionMetreleptin treatment substantially reduced glycemic variables, triglycerides, and liver enzymes (ALT and AST) and demonstrated durability of response throughout a 3-year treatment period. These results support metreleptin as a potential treatment for certain metabolic disorders (for example, diabetes mellitus and hypertriglyceridemia) associated with lipodystrophy. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:922-932)     

Once-Daily Insulin Glargine Versus 6-Hour Sliding Scale Regular Insulin for Control of Hyperglycemia after a Bariatric Surgical Procedure: A Randomized Clinical Trial

ObjectiveTo determine whether once-daily insulin glargine could provide better glycemic control after an abdominal surgical procedure than the traditional use of sliding scale regular insulin (SSRI).MethodsBecause 20% to 30% of patients undergoing gastric bypass have a history of overt diabetes and another 5% to 10% are estimated to have impaired glucose tolerance, we chose to study these patients. We treated 81 patients with postoperative blood glucose levels of more than 144 mg/dL after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgical procedure. They were randomized to receive either SSRI or insulin glargine either directly or after initial intravenous insulin infusion in the intensive care unit (ICU).ResultsOverall, the mean blood glucose level after SSRI therapy was 154 ± 33 mg/dL, and the mean blood glucose value after insulin glargine treatment was 134 ± 30 mg/dL (P < 0.01). The mean blood glucose level for patients first treated with intravenous insulin infusion in the ICU was 125 mg/dL, in comparison with 145 mg/dL in the non-ICU patients whose treatment began directly with 0.3 U/kg of insulin glargine. Of 926 blood glucose measurements, only 3 were less than 60 mg/dL.ConclusionIn this study, control of postoperative hyperglycemia was significantly better with use of insulin glargine in comparison with SSRI therapy, and hypo-glycemia was very infrequent. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13: 225-231)     

Novel hybrids of benzothiazole-1,3,4-oxadiazole-4-thiazolidinone: Synthesis,in silico ADME study,molecular docking and in vivo anti-diabetic assessment

A series of new benzothiazole-1,3,4-oxadiazole-4-thiazolidinone hybrid analogs (Tz1-Tz28) were synthesized in search of potential anti-diabetic agents. Molecular docking study was conducted with binding pocket of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma to elucidate the binding interactions of newly synthesized targets. Seven selected compounds with best docking scores were further screened for in vivo anti-hyperglycemic efficacy by oral glucose tolerance test in non-diabetic rats and on streptozotocin induced diabetic rat models. All the tested compounds demonstrated excellent to moderate reduction in blood glucose levels. Three of the compounds (Tz21, Tz7 and Tz10) showed excellent anti-diabetic effect by reducing concentration of glucose to 157.15 ± 1.79 mg/dL, 154.39 ± 1.71 mg/dL, 167.36 ± 2.45 mg/dL, respectively better than the standard drug, pioglitazone, 178.32 ± 1.88 mg/dL. Moreover, three derivatives Tz21, Tz4 and Tz24 with IC50 values of 0.21 ± 0.01 µM, 9.03 ± 0.12 µM and 11.96 ± 0.40 µM respectively also showed better inhibitory activities on alpha-glucosidase even more than the standard acarbose (IC50 = 18.5 ± 0.20 µM), indicating Tz21 has the highest inhibitory effect among the seven tested derivatives. Prediction of Drug like properties using molinspiration online software suggests that all the synthesized compounds have potential of becoming the orally active molecules. Thus, these novel hybrids could serve as potential candidates to become leads for the development of new drugs eliciting anti-hyperglycemic effect orally.     

Tumor-induced osteomalacia: a single center experience

ObjectiveTo describe the clinical presentation, localization modalities, and management of patients with tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO).MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of case records of patients diagnosed with TIO between January 1996 and March 2010 at our institution in Mumbai, India.ResultsNine patients (6 female and 3 male) with a mean age of 37.5 ± 17.5 years with biochemical and imaging evidence of TIO were included in the study. Overall, patients presented with proximal muscle weakness and pain. Three patients had neurofibromatosis 1, one had isolated schwannoma, and one had epidermal nevus syndrome. The mean delay in diagnosis was 7.67 years. Biochemical studies revealed normal serum calcium (mean, 9.2 ± 0.8 mg/dL), low serum phosphorus (mean, 1.36 ± 0.54 mg/dL), and low maximal tubular reabsorption of phosphorus factored for glomerular filtration rate (mean, 0.94 ± 0.49 mg/dL). Fibroblast growth factor-23 was increased in 3 of the patients without neurofibromatosis but was normal or near-normal in all the patients with neurofibromas. A fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography (FDG PET) scan helped to localize the tumors in 4 of the 5 patients with diagnoses other than neurofibromatosis. Three patients underwent surgical excision and were cured. One patient underwent biopsy and partial excision. Histopathologic findings were suggestive of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor, benign fibrous histiocytoma, nonossifying fibroma, and sciatic nerve schwannoma.ConclusionThere is a well-known delay in the diagnosis of TIO. FDG PET is a useful modality for localization of tumors. Preoperative localization increases the odds for cure after surgical excision. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17: 177-184)     

Chromium Infusion In Hospitalized Patients with Severe Insulin Resistance: A Retrospective Analysis

ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of intravenous chromium on serum glucose and insulin infusion rates in hospitalized patients with severe insulin resistance.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed hospital records from January 1, 2008, to December 1, 2008, to identify patients for whom intravenous chromium was ordered at our academic medical center. To be included, patients were required to demonstrate profound insulin resistance and uncontrolled hyperglycemia (defined as the inability to achieve a blood glucose value less than 200 mg/ dL during the 12 hours before chromium was given despite administration of continuous insulin infusion at a rate of 20 or more units/h) and to have received a continuous infusion of chromium chloride at 20 mcg/h for 10 to 15 hours for a total dose of 200 to 240 mcg.ResultsFourteen patients met our inclusion criteria. Over the hour preceding intravenous chromium infusion, the mean ± standard deviation rate of insulin infusion was 31 ± 15 units/h, and blood glucose was 326 ± 86 mg/dL. Twelve hours after the initiation of chromium, these values were 16 ± 16 units/h and 162 ± 76 mg/dL, respectively (P = .011 for difference in mean insulin rate from baseline, P <.001 for difference in mean blood glucose from baseline) and 24 hours after, these values were 12 ± 15 units/h and 144 ± 48 mg/dL, respectively (P <.001 for both).ConclusionsIntravenous chromium decreases insulin needs and improves glucose control at 12 and 24 hours compared with baseline values. Chromium appears to improve hyperglycemia and insulin resistance in acutely ill patients and represents a potential new therapy. Future prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:394-398)     

A Retrospective Study Comparing Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin With Glargine As Basal Therapy In Prednisone-Associated Diabetes Mellitus In Hospitalized Patients

ObjectiveTo compare glycemic outcomes in hospitalized patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH) vs glargine as basal insulin for management of glucocorticoid-associated hyperglycemia.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records in prednisone-treated adult patients with hyperglycemia in a university hospital. Consecutive patients were selected in both the NPH and glargine cohorts using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were assessed in each cohort. Glycemic outcomes were analyzed by comparing fasting blood glucose, mean daily blood glucose concentration, median daily blood glucose concentration, and the number of hypoglycemic episodes on a prespecified index day.ResultsOne hundred twenty patients were included: 60 patients in the NPH cohort and 60 patients in the glargine cohort. The weight-based insulin requirement was lower in the NPH cohort than in the glargine cohort (0.27 ± 0.2 units/kg vs 0.34 ± 0.2 units/kg [P = .04] for basal insulin and 0.26 ± 0.2 units/kg vs 0.36 ± 0.2 units/kg [P = .03] for bolus insulin). NPH and glargine cohorts were similar regarding age, sex, race, body mass index, hemoglobin A_1c, serum creatinine, and prednisone dosage. Glycemic outcomes in the NPH cohort compared with outcomes in the glargine cohort were similar regarding mean fasting blood glucose concentration (134 ± 49 mg/dL vs 139 ± 54 mg/dL [P = .63]), mean daily blood glucose (167 ± 46 mg/dL vs 165 ± 52 mg/dL [P = .79]), median blood glucose (160 ± 49 mg/dL vs 159 ± 57 mg/dL [P = .90]), and number of hypoglycemic episodes per day (0.12 ± 0.3 vs 0.10 ± 0.3 [P = .77]).ConclusionsNPH and glargine appear to be equally effective as basal insulin in the management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients receiving prednisone. However, the total daily insulin doses used were lower in the NPH cohort. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:712-719)     

Management of Hyperglycemia in Diabetic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies During Dexamethasone Therapy

ObjectiveTo compare the response to different insulin regimens for management of hyperglycemia in diabetic patients with hematologic malignancies who are receiving dexamethasone.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted to determine whether a basal bolus insulin (BBI) regimen with detemir and aspart is superior to a sliding scale regular insulin (SSI) regimen for management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized diabetic patients receiving dexamethasone.ResultsForty patients with hematologic malignancies were treated with intravenous (8 to 12 mg/day) or oral (40 mg/day) dexamethasone for 3 days. The average blood glucose (BG) level was 301 ± 57 mg/dL in the SSI group (n = 28) and 219 ± 51 mg/dL in the BBI group (n = 12) (P <.001). The BBI regimen resulted in an average BG reduction of 52 ± 82 mg/dL throughout the course of dexa-methasone therapy, while the SSI regimen produced an increase in the mean daily BG level of 128 ± 77 mg/dL (P <.001). On the last day of dexamethasone administration, the insulin requirement was 49 ± 29 units/day in the SSI group and 122 ± 39 units/day in the BBI group (P <.001). Three patients in the SSI group developed diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar hyperglycemia during steroid therapy. No hypoglycemia was observed in either group. The length of stay and infection rates were similar between groups.ConclusionBasal and bolus insulin regimen is an effective and safe approach for managing dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:231-235)     

Optimal Free Thyroxine Levels for Thyroid Hormone Replacement in Hypothyroidism

ObjectiveTo determine whether a difference exists in the free thyroxine level required to achieve a normal thyrotropin (thyroid-stimulating hormone or TSH) level between patients with primary hypothyroidism and euthyroid control subjects and compare the free thyroxine levels in patients with primary and secondary hypothyroidism receiving thyroid hormone replacement.MethodsWe retrospectively assessed TSH and free thyroxine values in 58 patients with primary hypothyroidism and 78 euthyroid control subjects for whom screening thyroid function tests had been performed. From the medical records, we also obtained free thyroxine values for 23 patients with central hypothyroidism receiving stable levothyroxine replacement therapy.ResultsThe mean free thyroxine level was significantly higher in patients with primary hypothyroidism than in euthyroid control subjects (1.36 ± 0.201 ng/dL versus 1.10 ± 0.155 ng/dL, respectively, P < .0001), whereas the corresponding mean TSH concentrations did not differ significantly (1.60 ± 1.183 mlU/L versus 1.73 ± 0.792 mlU/L, P = .46). The mean free thyroxine value was also significantly higher in the patients with central hypothyroidism in comparison with that in the euthyroid control subjects (1.31 ± 0.278 ng/dL versus 1.10 ± 0.155 ng/dL, respectively, P < .0001), and no significant difference was noted between the patients with primary and central hypothyroidism (1.36 ng/dL versus 1.31 ng/dL, P = .60).ConclusionPatients with hypothyroidism require a higher level of serum free thyroxine to achieve a normal TSH value in comparison with euthyroid control subjects. This finding suggests that patients with central hypothy-roidism should be treated to achieve free thyroxine levels in the upper part of the reference range. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:550-555)     

Relationship Between the Environmental Endocrine Disruptor Bisphenol a and Dyslipidemia: A Five-Year Prospective Study

Objective: To investigate whether serum bisphenol A (BPA) concentration is related to the occurrence of dyslipidemia.Methods: A total of 574 adults were enrolled at baseline and followed up for 5 years. Concentrations of serum BPA, triglycerides (TGs), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were measured. Dyslipidemia was defined as the existence of one or more of the following conditions: high-LDL-cholesterolemia (LDL ≥140 mg/dL), hypertriglyceridemia (TGs ≥150 mg/dL), or low-HDL-cholesterolemia (HDL <40 mg/dL). Participants were stratified into tertiles according to low, median, and high baseline serum BPA levels. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used. Data from baseline and follow-up were used for cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, respectively.Results: In the cross-sectional analysis, compared to subjects in the low BPA tertile, those in the high BPA tertile showed a higher level of LDL cholesterol (108.1 ± 24.4 mg/dL versus 119.5 ± 26.9 mg/dL; P<.05) and a lower level of HDL cholesterol (46.2 ± 11.7 mg/dL versus 39.5 ± 7.5 mg/dL; P<.05). In multivariable linear regression models, Z-transformed BPA was positively associated with LDL cholesterol (β= 0.13, P = .002) and negatively associated with HDL cholesterol (β= -0.28; P<.001). After cross-sectionally adjusting for confounders, subjects in higher BPA exposure was associated with a higher prevalence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia. Longitudinally, in subjects without low-HDL-cholesterolemia at baseline, each SD increment in baseline BPA was associated with a higher incidence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio [95% confidence interval; CI] 2.76, 95% CI 1.21, 6.29).Conclusion: Cross-sectionally, higher BPA exposure is associated with a higher prevalence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia. Longitudinally, baseline BPA is an independent predictor of the 5-year incidence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; BPA = bisphenol A; CI = confidence interval; CVD = cardiovascular disease; EIMDS = environment, inflammation and metabolic diseases study; HDL = high density lipoprotein; LDL = low density lipoprotein; OR = odds ratio; PPAR = peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; SBP = systolic blood pressure; TG = triglyceride; Z-BPA = Z-transformed bisphenol A     

Glycemic Control and Outcomes of Hospitalization in Noncritically Ill Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Admitted With Cardiac Problems or Infections

ObjectiveAlthough the importance of glycemic control is well established for patients with diabetes hospitalized for surgical problems, it has not been supported by clinical studies for patients with diabetes hospitalized on the medical floors.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 378 patients with type 2 diabetes admitted for cardiac or infectious disease (ID) diagnosis between September 1, 2011, and August 1, 2012. Exclusion criteria included type 1 diabetes, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), hospital stay shorter than 3 days, and daily glucocorticoid dose > 20 mg of methylprednisolone. The primary composite outcome included death during hospitalization, ICU transfer, initiation of enteral or parenteral nutrition, line infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, rise in plasma creatinine by 1 or > 2 mg/dL, new infection, an infection lasting for more than 20 days, and readmission within 30 days and between 1 and 10 months after discharge.ResultsPatients were stratified by mean blood glucose (BG) level: group 1 had mean BG of < 180 mg/dL (n = 286; mean BG, 142 ± 23 mg/dL), whereas group 2 had mean BG levels > 181 mg/dL (n = 92; mean BG, 218 ± 34 mg/dL; P < .0001). Group 2 had a 46% higher occurrence of the primary outcome (P < .0004). The rate of unfavorable events was greater in cardiac and ID patients with worse glycemic control (group 2).ConclusionOur data strongly support a positive influence of better glycemic control (average glycemia < 180 mg/dL or 10 mmol/L) on outcomes of hospitaliza-tion in patients with type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2014; 20:1303-1308)