Exenatide Therapy in Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Insulin

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of exenatide on clinical parameters in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose hyperglycemia is not adequately controlled despite treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, clinical progress of 52 obese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide, 5 mcg twice daily, in an outpatient setting was reviewed. Treatment initiation was between September and December 2005. Mean follow-up period was 26 weeks. Thirty-eight patients took exenatide regularly (Group A); 14 patients discontinued exenatide because of insurance, personal, or economic reasons (Group B). Measurements at baseline and at follow-up included body weight; blood pressure; and levels of hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and plasma lipids. Insulin dosage requirements were assessed.ResultsMean body weight (± standard error of the mean) decreased by 6.46 ± 0.8 kg (P < .001) in Group A and increased by 2.4 ± 0.6 kg in Group B (P < .001). In Group A, mean HbA_1c decreased by 0.6 ± 0.21% (P = .007), and the insulin dosage requirement decreased for rapid-acting and mixed insulins (P < .02). In Group A, means of the following parameters decreased: serum total cholesterol by 8.5 ± 3.3% (P = .03), triglycerides by 26 ± 7.6% (P = .01), systolic blood pressure by 9.2 ± 3.3 mm Hg (P = .02), and high-sensitivity CRP by 34 ± 14.3% (P = .05). These indices did not change in Group B.ConclusionExenatide effectively treats obese patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin, leading to weight loss and reduction in levels of HbA_lc, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and high-sensitivity CRP. (Endocr Pract 2007;13:444-450)     

Clinical Outcomes Using Long-Term Combination Therapy with Insulin Glargine and Exenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo examine the long-term effects of combination insulin glargine/exenatide treatment on glycemic control.MethodsWe conducted a 24-month retrospective US chart review of patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) levels > 7.0% for whom glargine and exenatide were coprescribed in differing order (glargine added after exenatide [exenatide/glargine]; exenatide added after glargine [glargine/exenatide]). Treatment order groups were combined to form a pooled treatment group. Changes from baseline in A1C, patients with A1C ≤ 7.0%, body weight, glargine/exenatide daily dose, oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) use, and hypoglycemia were evaluated.ResultsTreatment groups were similar at baseline; however, patients in the glargine/exenatide group (n = 121) (vs exenatide/glargine group [n = 44]) had longer disease duration (11.8 vs 8.0 years) and took fewer OADs (1.7 vs 2.3). Overall, baseline A1C was 8.8 ± 1.3% and weight was 109.5 ± 25.3 kg. Significant A1C reductions emerged at month 6 and persisted throughout 24 months (vs baseline) in both treatment groups (pooled: –0.7 ± 1.6; P < .001), and 33.0% of patients achieved an A1C level ≤ 7.0%. After 24 months of exenatide/glargine, body weight remained unchanged (0.7 ± 8.3 kg; P = .640). With glargine/exenatide, body weight decreased (–2.5 ± 6.7 kg; P = .001). At month 24, daily glargine dose was 0.40 ± 0.23 units/kg for the exenatide/glargine group and 0.47 ± 0.30 units/kg for the glargine/exenatide group. Hypoglycemia frequency was similar in both treatment groups.ConclusionsRegardless of treatment order, long-term combined therapy with glargine and exenatide for up to 24 months in patients with inadequately controlled T2DM suggests reduction of A1C without significant weight gain or increased hypoglycemia risk. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:17-25)     

Insulin Therapy and Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Iatrogenic hypoglycemia, the limiting factor in the glycemic management of diabetes mellitus (DM), is the result of therapeutic insulin excess and compromised physiological and behavioral defenses against falling plasma glucose concentrations.Objective: The goal of this article was to review the available evidence on insulin therapy and hypoglycemia, with a focus on type 2 DM.Methods: This review was based on the author's clinical experience, his >3 decades of translational research in the area of hypoglycemia, and his knowledge of the relevant preclinical and clinical literature.Results: Glycemic defenses become compromised rapidly in type 1 DM but slowly in type 2 DM. As a result, the frequency of hypoglycemia increases progressively as patients approach the insulin-deficient end of the spectrum of type 2 DM. Indeed, it appears that most episodes of hypoglycemia, including those of severe hypoglycemia, occur in individuals with type 2 DM. The conventional risk factors for hypoglycemia are based on relative or absolute insulin excess. It is clear that the pathogenesis of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure, and thus an increased risk for iatrogenic hypoglycemia, stems fundamentally from insulin deficiency. Relevant additional risk factors include the degree of insulin deficiency, a history of severe hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia unawareness, or both, as well as recent antecedent hypoglycemia, prior exercise and sleep, and aggressive glycemic therapy per se in advanced type 2 DM, just as in type 1 DM. The prevention of hypoglycemia involves the practice of hypoglycemia risk reductionȔdiscussion of the issue, application of the principles of aggressive therapy, and consideration of both the conventional risk factors and those relevant to compromised glycemic defensesȔin advanced type 2 DM, just as in type 1 DM. With this approach, it is possible to improve glycemic control and reduce the frequency of hypoglycemia in many people with DM.Conclusions: Pending the prevention and cure of DM, people with this disease need safe and effective therapies. Ultimately, that will require glucose-regulated insulin replacement or secretion. In the meantime, insight into the mechanisms of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure may lead to interventions that will further improve the lives of people affected by DM by reducing the frequency of hypoglycemia without compromising glycemic control.(Insulin. 2007;2:127-133)     

A Stepwise Approach to Insulin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Basal Insulin Treatment Failure

ObjectiveTo determine whether 1 or 2 preprandial injections before the meals of greatest glycemic impact can be as effective as 3 preprandial injections in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and basal insulin treatment failure.MethodsThis was an open-label, parallel-group, 1:1:1 randomized study of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus on oral antidiabetic drugs with glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels of 8.0% or greater. After a 14week run-in with insulin glargine, patients with an A1C level greater than 7.0% were randomly assigned to 1, 2, or 3 time(s) daily insulin glulisine for 24 weeks. Changes in A1C from randomization to study end; percentage of patients achieving an A1C level less than 7.0%; changes in A1C, fasting glucose concentrations, and weight at individual study points; and safety (adverse events and hypoglycemia) were assessed throughout the study.ResultsThree hundred forty-three of 631 patients (54%) completing the run-in phase with insulin glargine were randomly assigned to treatment arms. During the randomization phase, A1C reductions with insulin glulisine once or twice daily were noninferior to insulin glulisine 3 times daily (confidence intervals: -0.39 to 0.36 and -0.30 to 0.43; P > .5 for both). However, more patients met the target A1C with 3 preprandial injections (46 [46%]) than with 2 injections (34 [33%]) or 1 injection (30 [30%]). Severe hypoglycemia occurred in twice as many patients receiving 3 preprandial injections (16%) compared with those receiving 2 injections (8%) and 1 injection (7%), but these differences did not reach significance.ConclusionThis study provides evidence that initiation of prandial insulin in a simplified stepwise approach is an effective alternative to the current routine 3 preprandial injection basal-bolus approach. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:395-403)     

Safe and Simple Emergency Department Discharge Therapy for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Severe Hyperglycemia

ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and effectiveness of 2 simple discharge regimens for use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and severe hyperglycemia, who present to the emergency department (ED) and do not need to be admitted.MethodsWe conducted an 8-week, open-label, randomized controlled trial in 77 adult patients with DM2 and blood glucose levels of 300 to 700 mg/dL seen in a public hospital ED. Patients were randomly assigned to receive glipizide XL, 10 mg orally daily (G group), versus glipizide XL, 10 mg orally daily, plus insulin glargine, 10 U daily (G + G group). The primary outcome was to maintain safe fasting glucose and random glucose levels of < 350 and < 500 mg/dL up to 4 weeks and < 300 and < 400 mg/ dL, respectively, thereafter and to have no return ED visits (responders).ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar between the 2 treatment groups. The primary outcome was achieved in 87% of patients in both treatment groups. The enrollment mean blood glucose values of 440 and 467 mg/dL in the G and G + G groups, respectively, declined by the end of week 1 to 298 and 289 mg/dL and by week 8 to 140 and 135 mg/dL, respectively. Homeostasis model assessment of b-cell function and early insulin response improved 7-fold and 4-fold, respectively, in responders at the end of the 8-week study.ConclusionSulfonylurea with and without use of a small dose of insulin glargine rapidly improved blood glucose levels and b-cell function in patients with DM2. Use of sulfonylurea alone once daily can be considered a safe discharge regimen for such patients and an effective bridge between ED intervention and subsequent follow-up. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:696-704)     

Quality of Life and Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: A frequently cited barrier to insulin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is concern about the adverse effects on quality of life. Results of studies in this area have been mixed, with insulin use showing decreased, enhanced, or no impact on quality of life.Objective: The purpose of this paper is to discuss the state of the science regarding the effects of insulin on quality of life and to present strategies providers can implement in their clinical practices to decrease barriers to insulin use among patients with type 2 DM.Methods: An English-language MEDLINE search of the current literature using the terms insulin and quality of life was conducted for this article.Results: Although patient-identified concerns regarding insulin use represent some aspects of quality of life, study results have been mixed. However, 2 large studies examining the use of insulin glargine and its effects on quality of life found that glargine was associated with significantly greater improvements in quality of life when added to oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) than was the use of OADs alone. Another study examined the effects of intensive multi- therapy (monthly visits, self-management diabetes education, and medication adjustments) on quality of life among patients with type 2 DM and found that quality-of-life scores improved among patients who initiated insulin therapy during the trial. The effects of insulin delivery systems on quality of life have also been assessed. In these studies, patients preferred insulin pens over vials and syringes and inhaled over injected insulin. Health care providers can facilitate acceptance of insulin by employing strategies to help patients overcome psychological barriers to insulin therapy.Conclusions: Although patient concerns about the effects of insulin use are legitimate, insulin therapy is often needed to achieve treatment targets. Providers can reduce the impact on quality of life by addressing barriers, helping patients improve metabolic control, and providing ongoing information and support.     

Ultra Rapid-Acting Inhaled Insulin Improves Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo determine whether the use of an inhaled insulin would improve HbA1c.MethodsThis study was performed in 20 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) participants with HbA1c values ≥7.5 (58) to ≤11.5% (102 mmol/mol) on a variety of glucose-lowering regimens. Prandial Technosphere insulin (TI) was rapidly titrated based on a treatment algorithm using postprandial blood glucose to calculate premeal doses. A 2-week baseline period was followed by 12 weeks of active treatment with TI. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included glucose time in range (time in range: 70-180 mg/dL) obtained by a blinded continuous glucose monitoring during the baseline period and at the end of 12 weeks. Goals were to assess how to rapidly and safely initiate TI intensification, determine dosing requirements, and establish an effective dose range in uncontrolled T2DM.ResultsMean HbA1c decreased by −1.6% (−17 mmol/mol) from 9.0% (75 mmol/mol) at baseline to 7.4% (57 mmol/mol) at 12 weeks (P < .0001). Mean time in range increased from 42.2% to 65.7% (P < .0002). Mean prandial doses of TI were 18 or 19 units for all meals. Time below range was 1.1% baseline and 2.6% post treatment (P = .01).ConclusionTreatment with inhaled TI dosed using a simple algorithm improved glycemic control measured by both HbA1c and time in range, with low rates of hypoglycemia. These data add significantly to understanding TI in the management of T2DM patients for whom prandial insulin is a consideration.     

Two Urinary Peptides Associated Closely With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective

To monitor of type 2 diabetes more simply, conveniently and noninvasively, we are trying to identify the potential urinary peptides that associated with different stages of glucose control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

Firstly, we collected urine samples from type 2 diabetic patients and normal controls. These type 2 diabetic patients were divided into two groups according to fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c% (HbA1c), respectively. Magnetic beads based weak cation exchange chromatography (MB-WCX) was used to condense urinary peptides. The eluates were then analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Subsequently, ClinProt was used to profile and screen the polypeptide patterns based on different methods of grouping in diabetic patients and normal controls. Finally, the amino acid sequences of differentially expressed peptides were identified by nano-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and the protein sources of the corresponding peptide were matched in IPI Human database.

Results

Proteomics analysis found two up-regulated peptide (m/z 2756.1 and m/z 3223.2) representations in diabetic subjects, and the two peptides increased with increases in the amount of glycosylated hemoglobin. Further, the parallelism between m/z 3223.2 and glycosylated hemoglobin was better than the parallelism between m/z 2756.1 and glycosylated hemoglobin. Area under the receiver operating characteristic of the two peptides was 0.722 and 0.661, respectively. The above-mentioned peptide m/z 2756.1 was further identified as fragment of fibrinogen alpha chain precursor and m/z 3223.2 was fragment of prothrombin precursor.

Conclusion

These results suggested the two urinary biomarkers enable monitor of type 2 diabetes patients with different stages of glucose control.     

Self-Care Associated with Home Exercises in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The objective of this study was to verify self-care guidelines together with lower limb home exercises alter ankle and foot plantar pressure and alignment in patient with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) measuring health and sociodemographic factors. The health factors analyzed were sensitivity and circulation aspects, risk rating, and neuropathy symptom score, ankle and foot alignment (photogrammetry), plantar pressures, and postural stability (baropodometry) before and after administering these guidelines and home exercises in 97 patients type 2 DM during 10 months. The self-care guidelines and exercises changed the forefoot alignment (Right Foot – Initial vs Final, p = 0.04; Left Foot, P<0.01), the center of the force displacement in the mediolateral (Right Foot - Initial versus Final, p = 0.02; Left Foot, P<0.01), and the anterior-posterior (Right foot - Initial versus Final, p = 0.01) direction, and body balance (Initial versus Final, p = 0.02). There was no change in the remaining assessed parameters. Self-care associated with the guidelines for home exercises for the lower limbs in patients with type 2 DM are effective in maintaining and improving the alignment of the feet, mediolateral stability and prevention of complications.

Trial Registration

The Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry RBR-8854CD     

Insulin resistance and decreased spexin in Indian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Spexin is novel biomarker, which plays a potential role in glucose and lipid metabolisms. However, there was paucity of serum spexin levels in obesity and diabetes mellitus subjects. Hence the current study was aimed to find the relationship between the serum spexin levels in type 2 Diabetes mellitus (type 2 DM) with extrapolation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. A cross-sectional study included 330 participants, subdivided as control (n=110), type 2 DM (n=110) and type 2 DM with CVD groups (n=110). HbA1c, insulin, lipid profile, spexin & leptin including blood pressure and body mass index were analyzed from all the participants. The serum spexin levels (ng/ml) were significantly decreased in type 2 DM (mean ± sd: 0.65 ± 0.03) and type 2 DM with CVD (0.48 ± 0.02) groups compared to the control (0.79 ± 0.03) group (p<0.001). The decreased spexin levels were observed in type 2 DM, and further more decreased in type 2 DM with CVD patients compared to controls indicating that spexin levels could be served as an early prediction of obesity-induced T2DM with CVD risk.     

Use of Insulin Pump Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes After Failure of Multiple Daily Injections

ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of insulin pump use (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; CSII) in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) who have failed multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy.MethodsIn this retrospective study, charts of patients with DM2 who were started on CSII after failure of MDI were reviewed. Patients were categorized as primarily manual (fixed) bolus users or calculated (using pump software) bolus users. The change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), weight, and basal insulin dose from baseline to 6 months was determined.ResultsFifty-seven patients (20 men and 37 women) ranging in age from 13 to 71 were identified in the study. A significant reduction in HbA1c was observed from 8.75 to 7.69% (P<.001). There was an increase in body mass index (BMI) from a mean of 36.53 to a mean of 37.21. A decrease in basal insulin requirement per kilogram of weight (−0.10 U/kg) was noted (P = .03). Seven patients using U-500 insulin in the pump also had a significant decrease in HbA1C of 1.1 % (P<.001), along with a 0.071 U/kg drop in basal insulin requirements (P<.001). When comparing calculated bolus users to manual bolus users, there was no difference in HbA1C improvement (P = .58).ConclusionWe found that CSII improves glucose control in patients with DM2 who have failed MDI despite a decrease in overall insulin requirements. This includes patients with severe insulin resistance using U-500 insulin. Use of frequent bolus adjustment incorporating carbohydrate counting and current glucose level does not appear to be required for this benefit. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19: 9-13)     

Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Basal-Prandial Insulin Therapy: A Case-Based Review

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a growing epidemic in the United States—20.8 million people are affected and 90% to 95% of all diagnosed cases are type 2 DM. Nevertheless, implementation of insulin therapy is often delayed in patients with type 2 DM. This delay can increase the risk of DM-related complications, including microvascular neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, and cardiovascular disease.Objective: This article provides a case-based review outlining a novel strategy for advancing therapy with a modified basal and prandial insulin regimen to achieve recommended glycemic targets in type 2 DM as quickly as possible. Evidence-based treatment strategies are also discussed.Methods: Materials used for this article were identified through an English-language literature search of MEDLINE (1967-2007) using the following terms: insulin, postprandial glucose control, and type 2 diabetes.Results: As shown with this male 46-year-old case study patient, type 2 DM is treated initially with diet and exercise, followed by oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). However, oral therapy typically reduces glycosylated hemoglobin values only by -1.5% to 2.0%. Intensive therapy with once-daily basal insulin in combination with a previously prescribed OAD regimen can achieve normoglycemia and reduce the long-term complications of DM. In patients with postprandial glucose excursions, prandial insulin can be added using a rapid-acting insulin analogue (aspart, lispro, or glulisine).Conclusions: A key factor in this case patient's ability to reach glycemic targets within I year of diagnosis of type 2 DM was the accelerated implementation of insulin therapy. Such a therapeutic approach obviates the risk for uncontrolled hyperglycemia, which is associated with the standard practice of beginning treatment with diet and exercise alone and slowly advancing by i OAD at a time, ending with insulin therapy as a last resort. (Insulin. 2007;2:118-126)     

Glycemic Control and Outcomes of Hospitalization in Noncritically Ill Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Admitted With Cardiac Problems or Infections

ObjectiveAlthough the importance of glycemic control is well established for patients with diabetes hospitalized for surgical problems, it has not been supported by clinical studies for patients with diabetes hospitalized on the medical floors.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 378 patients with type 2 diabetes admitted for cardiac or infectious disease (ID) diagnosis between September 1, 2011, and August 1, 2012. Exclusion criteria included type 1 diabetes, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), hospital stay shorter than 3 days, and daily glucocorticoid dose > 20 mg of methylprednisolone. The primary composite outcome included death during hospitalization, ICU transfer, initiation of enteral or parenteral nutrition, line infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, rise in plasma creatinine by 1 or > 2 mg/dL, new infection, an infection lasting for more than 20 days, and readmission within 30 days and between 1 and 10 months after discharge.ResultsPatients were stratified by mean blood glucose (BG) level: group 1 had mean BG of < 180 mg/dL (n = 286; mean BG, 142 ± 23 mg/dL), whereas group 2 had mean BG levels > 181 mg/dL (n = 92; mean BG, 218 ± 34 mg/dL; P < .0001). Group 2 had a 46% higher occurrence of the primary outcome (P < .0004). The rate of unfavorable events was greater in cardiac and ID patients with worse glycemic control (group 2).ConclusionOur data strongly support a positive influence of better glycemic control (average glycemia < 180 mg/dL or 10 mmol/L) on outcomes of hospitaliza-tion in patients with type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2014; 20:1303-1308)     

住院期间老年2型糖尿病患者低血糖原因分析及对策

目的:探讨住院期间老年2型糖尿病患者发生低血糖的原因及相关对策。方法:选择2012年12月~2013年12月住院治疗的老年2型糖尿病患者150例。根据是否发生低血糖将其分为未发生低血糖组80例(对照组)和发生低血糖组70例(研究组)。对两组患者的临床数据资料进行统计学比较。结果:1研究组患者的平均年龄、病程、体重指数、住院天数和对照组患者比较差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05);2研究组患者血肌酐(Cr)水平和尿微量清蛋白定量(UMA)均显著高于对照组患者(P0.05);3低血糖在夜间02:00~05:59发生的频率明显较高;4研究组二甲双胍的应用比例明显低于对照组(P0.05),胰岛素的使用率和OAD+胰岛素联合应用的情况明显高于对照组(P0.05)。结论:老年2型糖尿病患者病程长、BMI低;血肌酐(Cr)水平和尿微量清蛋白定量(UMA)高;胰岛素的使用率及胰岛素联用OAD应用率高均会增加低血糖的发生风险。老年2型糖尿病患者应注意饮食治疗、运动治疗、药物治疗、血糖监测以及心理护理和健康指导。医护人员需为患者制定个体化的血糖控制目标,将老年2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制在适当水平。     

Diabetes Mellitus: Distinguishing Between Patients Receiving Insulin and Those Requiring Insulin Therapy

Fifteen patients with maturity onset type diabetes, all of whom had received insulin for periods of one to thirty-five years, were admitted to hospital and insulin treatment was discontinued. Within 24 to 48 hours each patient was given an intravenous tolbutamide test, following which all were given either diet therapy alone or diet therapy plus oral agents. If significant hyperglycemia or ketonemia resulted, insulin therapy was reinstituted.Approximately 50 percent (8 of 15) of the patients showed improvement in fasting blood sugar levels following discontinuation of insulin. It was not possible to distinguish the insulin independent from the insulin dependent group using such criteria as age, sex, degree of overweight, insulin dosage, duration of diabetes or duration of insulin therapy. However, using the intravenous tolbutamide test it was possible to differentiate between the two groups. Those who did not require insulin responded to intravenous tolbutamide with a glucose decrease greater than 10 percent from the initial value. The insulin dependent group had either no glucose decrease or a rise in blood glucose following intravenous administration of tolbutamide.     

Impaired Orthostatic Response in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After 48 Hours of Bed Rest

ObjectiveTo compare the effect of bed rest on orthostatic responses of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nondiabetic control subjects.MethodsSix patients with type 2 diabetes and 6 nondiabetic control subjects underwent 48 hours of bed rest and 48 hours of ambulatory activity in randomized order. A 10-minute tilt test was conducted before and after each period of hospitalization, and cardiovascular responses to 80° head-up tilt were analyzed with use of a 2-factorial (study group and bed rest condition) analysis of variance design. We hypothesized that patients with diabetes would experience more severe changes in orthostatic response after bed rest.ResultsNo significant differences in orthostatic responses were observed before bed rest between control subjects and patients with diabetes. After bed rest, control subjects had a greater (P = .01) increase in heart rate during tilt in comparison with before bed rest (before versus after bed rest, 9 ± 4 versus 24 ± 7 beats/min) and maintained their blood pressure during tilt. After bed rest, patients with diabetes did not have a compensatory increase in heart rate and had a greater (P = .02) decline in systolic blood pressure during tilt in comparison with before bed rest (before versus after bed rest, -7 ± 10 versus -21 ± 11 mm Hg). Their arm and leg skin vasomotor responses (laser Doppler flowmetry) during tilt were not altered after bed rest and were similar to those in control subjects before and after bed rest.ConclusionCardiac neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes may prevent a compensatory heart rate response after bed rest deconditioning and result in a more severe orthostatic response. A greater decrease in blood pressure with upright tilt is evident after a relatively short period of bed rest. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:104-110)     

大剂量胰岛素联合西格列汀对老年2 型糖尿病患者的疗效

目的:研究大剂量胰岛素联合西格列汀对老年2型糖尿病患者的疗效。方法:选择2012年1月~2015年12月在我院进行诊治的老年2型糖尿病患者82例,随机分为两组,观察组采用大剂量胰岛素联合西格列汀治疗,对照组采用大剂量胰岛素治疗,两组均治疗3个月。比较两组治疗前后的甘油三酯、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白和高密度脂蛋白水平,餐后2 h血糖、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白,胰岛素抵抗指数、胰岛素分泌指数、每日胰岛素总量和低血糖发生次数。结果:对照组治疗前后的血脂水平无明显差异(P0.05),观察组治疗后的甘油三酯、总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白明显降低(P0.05),高密度脂蛋白明显升高(P0.05);治疗后,两组的餐后2 h血糖、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白均明显降低(P0.05),且观察组降低更为明显(P0.05);对照组治疗前后的胰岛素抵抗指数、胰岛素分泌指数和每日胰岛素总量均无明显差异(P0.05),观察组治疗后的胰岛素抵抗指数和每日胰岛素总量均明显降低(P0.05),胰岛素分泌指数明显升高(P0.05);两组治疗前后低血糖发生次数和身体质量指数均无明显差异(P0.05)。结论:大剂量胰岛素联合西格列汀能有效控制老年2型糖尿病患者的血糖水平,改善胰岛β细胞功能,减少胰岛素用量,是一种安全有效的治疗方法。     

The Efficacy and Safety of Co-Administration of Sitagliptin With Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at Hospital Discharge

Objective: Few randomized controlled trials have focused on the optimal management of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) during the transition from the inpatient to outpatient setting. This multicenter open-label study explored a discharge strategy based on admission hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to guide therapy in general medicine and surgery patients with T2D.Methods: Patients with HbA1c ≤7% (53 mmol/mol) were discharged on sitagliptin and metformin; patients with HbA1c between 7 and 9% (53–75 mmol/mol) and those >9% (75 mmol/mol) were discharged on sitagliptinmetformin with glargine U-100 at 50% or 80% of the hospital daily dose. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c at 3 and 6 months after discharge.Results: Mean HbA1c on admission for the entire cohort (N = 253) was 8.70 ± 2.3% and decreased to 7.30 ± 1.5% and 7.30 ± 1.7% at 3 and 6 months (P<.001). Patients with HbA1c <7% went from 6.3 ± 0.5% to 6.3 ± 0.80% and 6.2 ± 1.0% at 3 and 6 months. Patients with HbA1c between 7 and 9% had a reduction from 8.0 ± 0.6% to 7.3 ± 1.1% and 7.3 ± 1.3%, and those with HbA1c >9% from 11.3 ± 1.7% to 8.0 ± 1.8% and 8.0 ± 2.0% at 3 and 6 months after discharge (both P<.001). Clinically significant hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was observed in 4%, 4%, and 7% among patients with a HbA1c <7%, 7 to 9%, and >9%, while a glucose <40 mg/dL was reported in <1% in all groups.Conclusion: The proposed HbA1c-based hospital discharge algorithm using a combination of sitagliptin-metformin was safe and significantly improved glycemic control after hospital discharge in general medicine and surgery patients with T2D.Abbreviations: BG = blood glucose; DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase-4; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; T2D = type 2 diabetes     

A Prospective Trial of U500 Insulin Delivered by Omnipod in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Severe Insulin Resistance

ObjectiveTo test the effectiveness and safety of U500 regular insulin delivered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) via the Omnipod insulin delivery system in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe insulin resistance.MethodsIn this prospective, 1-year, proof-of-concept trial, patients with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes who had a hemoglobin A1c level of 7.0% or higher and severe insulin resistance (average insulin requirement, 1.74 units of insulin per kilogram each day; range, 1.4 to 2.64 units of insulin per kilogram [average insulin dose, 196.4 units daily]) were identified at routine office visits at Mountain Diabetes and Endocrine Center in Asheville, North Carolina, between December 2007 and August 2008. All patients had been on intensive insulin therapy with or without oral agents for more than 3 months. All patients were switched from baseline failed therapy to U500 regular insulin by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion via Omnipod. Effectiveness was assessed by hemoglobin A1c measurement and 72-hour continuous glucose monitoring at baseline and at weeks 13, 26, and, 52 and by treatment satisfaction assessed by the Insulin Delivery Rating System Questionnaire at baseline and at week 52 while on U500 via Omnipod.ResultsTwenty-one adults were enrolled (mean age, 54 years; mean duration of diabetes, 4 years; mean body mass index, 39.4 kg/m2; mean insulin requirement, 1.7 U/ kg per day; and mean hemoglobin A1c, 8.6%) whose previous treatment with U100 insulin regimens had failed. Twenty patients completed the study. Treatment with U500 insulin via Omnipod significantly reduced hemoglobin A1c by 1.23% (P < .001) and significantly increased the percentage of time spent in the blood glucose target range (70- 180 mg/dL) by 70.75% as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (P < .001) without a significant increase in hypoglycemia. Patients were satisfied with treatment with U500 insulin via Omnipod, and 14 patients elected to remain on treatment at study completion.ConclusionsU500 insulin delivered subcutaneously continuously via Omnipod is a safe and effective method of insulin delivery in the very insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic population. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:778-784)