Initial Combination Therapy with Metformin and Colesevelam for Achievement of Glycemic and Lipid Goals Min Early Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with metformin plus colesevelam in patients with early type 2 diabetes.MethodsIn this 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, adults with type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A1c [A1C] values of 6.5% to 10.0%) and hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] levels ≥ 100 mg/dL) were randomly assigned (1:1) to colesevelam (3.75 g/d) or placebo in combination with open-label metformin (850 mg/d; uptitrated at week 2 to 1, 700 mg/d). The primary efficacy evaluation was change in A1C from baseline to study end (week 16 with last observation carried forward).ResultsIn total, 286 patients were randomized: metformin/colesevelam (n = 145) or metformin/placebo (n = 141). Mean A1C was reduced by 1.1% with metformin/ colesevelam (from 7.8% at baseline to 6.6% at study end) and by 0.8% with metformin/placebo (from 7.5% to 6.7%), resulting in a treatment difference of -0.3% at study end (P = .0035). In addition, metformin/colesevelam significantly reduced LDL-C (-16.3%), total cholesterol (-6.1%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-8.3%), apolipoprotein B (-8.0%), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (-17%) and increased apolipoprotein A-I (+ 4.4%) and triglycerides (+ 18.6%) versus metformin/placebo (P < .01 for all). The proportions of patients who achieved recommended goals with metformin/colesevelam versus metformin/placebo, respectively, were as follows: A1C < 7.0% (67% versus 56% [P = .0092]), LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (48% versus 18% [P < .0001]), and composite A1C < 7.0% + LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (40% versus 12% [P < .0001]). Safety and tolerability were similar between the treatment groups.ConclusionMetformin plus colesevelam may be a valid option for initial therapy to achieve glycemic and lipid goals safely in early type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:629-640)     

A Comparison of Twice-Daily Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30 and Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Persons With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin and Oral Therapy: A Randomized,Open-Label Study

ObjectiveTo compare efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 30) with insulin (glargine) in type 2 diabetic patients who were not maintaining glycemic control on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs.MethodsIn a 24-week, open-label, parallel-group trial, type 2 diabetic patients who were not maintaining glycemic control on basal insulin (glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn) + oral antidiabetic drugs were randomly assigned to twice-daily BIAsp 30 + metformin or oncedaily glargine + metformin + secretagogues (secretagogues were discontinued in the BIAsp 30 arm).ResultsOne hundred thirty-seven patients were randomly assigned to the BIAsp 30 group and 143 patients were randomly assigned to the glargine group. Of 280 patients randomized, 229 (81.8%) completed the study. End-of-trial hemoglobin A_1c reductions were − 1.3% (BIAsp 30) vs − 1.2% (glargine) (treatment difference: 95% confidence interval, − 0.06 [− 0.32 to 0.20]; P = .657). Of patients taking BIAsp 30, 27.3% reached a hemoglobin A_1c level < 7.0% compared with 22.0% of patients taking glargine (treatment difference: P = .388). Glucose increment averaged over 3 meals was lower in the BIAsp 30 arm (treatment difference: − 17.8 mg/dL, P = .001). Fasting plasma glucose reductions from baseline were − 13.8 mg/ dL (BIAsp 30) vs − 42.5 mg/dL (glargine) (P = .0002). Final minor hypoglycemia rate, insulin dose, and weight change were higher in the BIAsp 30 arm (6.5 vs 3.4 events/patient per year, P <.05; 1.19 vs 0.63 U/kg; and 3.1 vs 1.4 kg, P = .0004, respectively).ConclusionsDespite not receiving secretagogues, patients taking BIAsp 30 + metformin achieved similar hemoglobin A_1c levels and lower postprandial plasma glucose compared with those receiving glargine + metformin + secretagogues. The large improvement in the glargine group suggests the patients were not true basal failures at randomization. While switching to BIAsp 30 improves glycemic control in this patient population, remaining on basal insulin and optimizing the dose may be equally effective in the short term. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:41-50)     

Colesevelam Hydrochloride Added to Background Metformin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis from 3 Clinical Studies

ObjectiveTo evaluate the glucose- and lipid-altering efficacy of colesevelam hydrochloride (HCl) when added to background metformin therapy in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsThis post hoc analysis included patients with T2DM from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled pivotal studies who received metformin as part of their background antidiabetes therapy. In the pivotal studies, patients with T2DM were randomly assigned to receive colesevelam HCl (3.75 g/d) or placebo added to existing metformin (26 weeks), sulfonylurea (26 weeks), or insulin (16 weeks) monotherapy or combination therapy, wherein the combination therapies may have included metformin.ResultsIn this pooled analysis of 696 patients with T2DM who were receiving metformin monotherapy or metformin combined with other antidiabetes therapies, 355 were randomly assigned to receive colesevelam HCl and 341 to receive placebo. In comparison with placebo, colesevelam HCl significantly reduced hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose (mean treatment difference: -0.50% and -15.7 mg/dL, respectively; P < .001 for both), as well as significantly reduced levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; mean treatment difference: -16.5%), total cholesterol (TC; -5.8%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C; -8.2%), and apolipoprotein (apo) B (-7.6%) (P < .0001 for all). Median triglyceride levels were increased with colesevelam HCl (median treatment difference: + 12.8%; P < .0001). In comparison with placebo, colesevelam HCl significantly increased apo A-I (mean treatment difference: + 3.3%; P < .0001), whereas the mean increase in HDL-C with colesevelam HCl was not significant. Colesevelam HCl therapy was generally well tolerated.ConclusionWhen added to metformin-including therapy, colesevelam HCl significantly reduced A1C and fasting glucose, as well as levels of LDL-C, TC, non- HDL-C, and apo B in patients with inadequately controlled T2DM. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:933-938)     

Improved Glycemic Control with Insulin Glargine Versus Pioglitazone as Add-On Therapy to Sulfonylurea or Metformin in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo compare glycemic control with add-on insulin glargine versus pioglitazone treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.MethodsThis 48-week, multicenter, parallel-group, open-label study randomized 389 adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin A1c [A1C], 8.0% to 12.0%), despite ≥ 3 months of sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy, to receive add-on therapy with insulin glargine or pioglitazone. Outcomes included A1C change from baseline to end point (primary), percentage of patients achieving A1C levels ≤ 7.0%, and changes from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, body mass index, weight, and serum lipids. The safety analysis included incidence of adverse events and rates of hypoglycemia.ResultsAt end point, insulin glargine yielded a significantly greater reduction in A1C in comparison with pioglitazone (-2.48% versus -1.86%, respectively; 95% confidence interval, -0.93 to -0.31; P = .0001, 48-week modified intent-to-treat population). Insulin glargine also yielded significantly greater reductions in fasting plasma glucose at all time points (end point difference, -34.9 mg/ dL; 95% confidence interval, -47.6 to -22.2; P < .0001). In comparison with pioglitazone, insulin glargine resulted in a lower overall incidence of possibly related treatmentemergent adverse events (12.0% versus 20.7%) and fewer study discontinuations (2.2% versus 9.1%), but a higher rate (per patient-year) of confirmed clinically relevant hypoglycemic episodes (blood glucose < 70 mg/dL and all severe hypoglycemia) (4.97 versus 1.04; P <.0001) and severe hypoglycemia (0.07 versus 0.01; P = .0309). Weight and body mass index changes were similar between the 2 treatment groups.ConclusionThe addition of insulin glargine early in the diabetes treatment paradigm in patients for whom sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy had failed resulted in significantly greater improvements in glycemic control in comparison with the addition of pioglitazone. Although severe hypoglycemia was more frequent in patients with insulin glargine therapy, hypoglycemic events occurred in < 5% of patients in the insulin glargine treatment group. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:588-599)     

Beneficial effects of oral chromium picolinate supplementation on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical study

BackgroundChromium is an essential mineral that contributes to normal glucose function and lipid metabolism. This study evaluated the effect of chromium picolinate (CrPic) supplementation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsA four month controlled, single blind, randomized trial was performed with 71 patients with poorly controlled (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] > 7%) T2DM divided into 2 groups: Control (n = 39, using placebo), and supplemented (n = 32, using 600 μg/day CrPic). All patients received nutritional guidance according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA), and kept using prescribed medications. Fasting and postprandial glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides and serum ferritin were evaluated.ResultsCrPic supplementation significantly reduced the fasting glucose concentration (−31.0 mg/dL supplemented group; −14.0 mg/dL control group; p < 0.05, post- vs. pre-treatment, in each group) and postprandial glucose concentration (−37.0 mg/dL in the supplemented group; −11.5 mg/dL in the control group; p < 0.05). HbA1c values were also significantly reduced in both groups (p < 0.001, comparing post- vs. pre-treatment groups). Post-treatment HbA1c values in supplemented patients were significantly lower than those of control patients. HbA1c lowering in the supplemented group (−1.90), and in the control group (−1.00), was also significant, comparing pre- and post-treatment values, for each group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). CrPic increased serum chromium concentrations (p < 0.001), when comparing the supplemented group before and after supplementation. No significant difference in lipid profile was observed in the supplemented group; however, total cholesterol, HDL-c and LDL-c were significantly lowered, comparing pre- and post-treatment period, in the control group (p < 0.05).ConclusionsCrPic supplementation had a beneficial effect on glycemic control in patients with poorly controlled T2DM, without affecting the lipid profile. Additional studies are necessary to investigate the effect of long-term CrPic supplementation.     

Concomitant Oral Antihyperglycemic Agent Use and Associated Treatment Outcomes After Initiation of Insulin Therapy

ObjectiveTo compare outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin lispro mix 75/25 (75% insulin lispro protamine suspension and 25% lispro) or insulin glargine therapy, stratified by baseline oral antihyperglycemic agent (OHA) use.MethodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of 6-month data from the DURABLE clinical trial, which enrolled patients with hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) levels > 7.0% treated with 2 or more OHAs (metformin, sulfonylurea, and thiazolidinedione), and randomly assigned them to treatment with twice-daily insulin lispro 75/25 or oncedaily glargine.ResultsIn both insulin treatment groups, metformin/ thiazolidinedione-treated patients had significantly greater improvement in A1C levels (-2.19% to -2.36%), lower end point A1C values, and lower rates of occurrence of hypoglycemia in comparison with metformin/sulfonylurea-treated patients (all P < .05). Patients treated with sulfonylurea/thiazolidinedione or metformin/sulfonylurea/thiazolidinedione did not differ significantly from metformin/sulfonylurea-treated patients in A1C change (-1.56% to -1.84%) or rates of occurrence of hypoglycemia.ConclusionIn these post hoc analyses, patients with type 2 diabetes initiating premixed or basal insulin therapy and treated concomitantly with the OHA combination of metformin/thiazolidinedione at baseline demonstrated significantly greater A1C improvement with less hypoglycemia in comparison with patients treated with metformin/ sulfonylurea. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:563-567)     

Efficacy and Safety of Linagliptin in Black/African American Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A 6-Month,Randomized, Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Study

ObjectiveAlthough black/African American individuals are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes, there is scant clinical trial information available on antidiabetes therapies in this group. We compared linagliptin with placebo in black/African American adults who were treatment-naïve or receiving one oral antidiabetes drug.MethodsOf 226 patients randomized to 24 weeks’ linagliptin 5 mg/day or placebo, 208 had baseline and at least one on-treatment glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) measurement. Mean baseline HbA_1c was 8.6% in the linagliptin group (n = 98) and 8.68% in the placebo group (n = 110). The primary outcome was change in HbA_1c from baseline to week 24.ResultsBy week 24, mean HbA_1c changes were − 0.84% with linagliptin and − 0.25% with placebo (treatment difference, − 0.58%; P < .001), and more patients in the linagliptin group achieved HbA_1c < 7.0% (26.8% vs. 8.3%; P = .001) or an HbA_1c reduction ≥ 0.5% (54.1% vs. 30.0%; P < .001). Mean weight loss was − 1.1 kg in both groups. During the treatment period, 8 of 98 linagliptingroup patients and 17 of 110 placebo-group patients required rescue therapy (odds ratio, 0.5; P = .14). For postprandial glucose, values were available for few patients (11 placebo, 10 linagliptin), and thus the between-group difference was associated with wide confidence intervals (CIs) (difference, − 1.97 mg/dL; 95% CI, − 53.80 to 49.86; P = .94). In the overall study population, a similar proportion of patients in both groups had adverse events (58.5% vs. 61.7%); most events were mild or moderate and considered unrelated to study drug. Investigator-defined hypoglycemia was rare (3 linagliptin-group patients and 1 placebogroup patient), with no severe events (requiring external assistance).ConclusionThis study confirms that linagliptin is efficacious and well tolerated in black/African American patients with type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20: 412-420)     

Frequency of Continuous Glucose Monitoring use and Change in Hemoglobin A1C for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes in a Clinical Practice Setting

ObjectiveTo estimate the frequency of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use and change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) alone in adults with type 1 diabetes in a clinical practice setting.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 66 adult type 1 diabetes patients at the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes (BDC) who first initiated CGM between 2006 and 2011 and 67 controls using SMBG. The frequency of CGM use was estimated from survey recall and defined as the mean number of days/month of CGM use during a maximum follow-up of 10 months. Change in HbA1c was calculated as the difference between the baseline value and the lowest follow-up value.ResultsThe mean change in HbA1c for CGM users was − 0.48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: − 0.67, − 0.28) and for SMBG users was − 0.37% (95% CI: − 0.56, − 0.18). The between-group mean difference in change in HbA1c, adjusted for patient characteristics, was − 0.11% (95% CI: − 0.38, 0.16), whereas the subgroup with a baseline HbA1c ≥ 7.0% and users of CGM ≥ 21 days/month was − 0.36% (95% CI, − 0.78, 0.05). Nearly half (n = 32, 48%) used CGM < 21 days/month. The reasons for low frequency of CGM use or discontinuation included sensor costs, frequency of alarms, inaccuracy, and discomfort.ConclusionsThese CGM data from clinical practice suggest a trend toward decreasing HbA1c for adults with type 1 diabetes, especially in patients with higher baseline HbA1c and higher frequency of CGM use. Future studies are needed to assess the use of CGM in larger populations of clinical practice adult type 1 diabetes patients. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:1007-1015)     

Evaluación de la utilización de las prestaciones específicas de los sistemas de infusión subcutánea de insulina y su relación con el control metabólico en pacientes con diabetes tipo 1

Background and objectivePatients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) have available several specific features of these devices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between real use of them and the degree of glycemic control in patients using this therapy.Patients and methodsForty-four T1DM patients on CSII therapy with or without real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) were included. Data from 14 consecutive days were retrospectively collected using the therapy management software CareLink Personal/Pro^® and HbA1c measurement performed at that period. The relationship between the frequency of usie of specific features of insulin pumps (non-sensor augmented or sensor-augmented) and glycemic control was analyzed.ResultsMean HbA1c in the group was 7.5 ± .8%. Mean daily number of boluses administered was 5.1 ± 1.8, with 75.4% of them being bolus wizards (BW). Daily number of boluses was significantly greater in patients with HbA1c < 7.5% than in those with HbA1c > 7.5% (5.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.3 ± 1.6, P = .056). There was a trend to greater use of BW in patients with better control (82.8 ± 21.4% vs. 69.9 ± 29.1%, P = .106). HbA1c was lower in patients using CGM (n = 8) as compared to those not using sensor-augmented pumps (7.6 ± .8 vs 7.1 ± .7, P = .067), but the difference was not statistically significant.ConclusionsMore frequent use of BW appears to be associated to better metabolic control in patients with T1DM using pump therapy. In standard clinical practice, augmentation of insulin pump with CGM may be associated to improved glycemic control.     

Effect of Hospital Admission on Glycemic Control 1 Year After Discharge

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of hospital admission on glycemic control in patients with diabetes up to 1 year after discharge.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 826 adults with diabetes admitted to a tertiary care medical center and with available hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) values for 6 months before admission and 1 year after discharge. We compared them with 826 nonhospitalized adults with diabetes matched for age, sex, race, comorbidity, and baseline A1C level. We determined the change in A1C value relative to hospitalization and baseline A1C level by using multivariate random effects models for repeated measures. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of achieving recommended A1C levels at 1 year.ResultsPatients with baseline A1C levels ≥ 9% had an adjusted rate of change in A1C value of − 0.10% per month (95% confidence interval [CI], − 0.18 to − 0.022; P = .012) during the course of 1 year, without significant differences between hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients in the mean rate of change. Hospitalized patients, however, were less likely to achieve an A1C goal of ≤ 7% at 1 year (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.86; P < .001) or an A1C of < 8% at 1 year (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.81; P < .001) in comparison with the nonhospitalized patients.ConclusionDespite an overall trend toward improved glycemia over time, hospitalized patients with uncontrolled diabetes were less likely to achieve glycemic targets at 1 year in comparison with matched nonhospitalized patients. These results suggest a missed opportunity to improve long-term glycemic control in hospitalized patients with diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:456-463)     

Colesevelam Hydrochloride to Treat Hypercholesterolemia and Improve Glycemia in Prediabetes: A Randomized,Prospective Study

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of the bile acid sequestrant colesevelam hydrochloride in patients with hypercholesterolemia and prediabetes.MethodsIn this 16-week, randomized, double-blind study, adults with untreated prediabetes (2-hour postoral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] glucose ≥ 140 to 199 mg/dL, fasting plasma glucose [FPG] ≥ 110 to 125 mg/ dL, or both), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 100 mg/dL, and triglycerides < 500 mg/dL were randomly assigned to receive colesevelam (3.75 g/d) or placebo. The primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 16 with last observation carried forward. Secondary end points included change in FPG, hemoglobin A1c (A1C), and 2-hour post-OGTT glucose level from baseline to week 16 and attainment of LDL-C and FPG targets.ResultsIn total, 216 patients were randomized (colesevelam, 108; placebo, 108). In comparison with placebo, colesevelam significantly reduced LDL-C (mean treatment difference, -15.6%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.1%), total cholesterol (-7.2%), apolipoprotein B (-8.1%) (P < .001 for all the foregoing), FPG (median, -2.0 mg/dL; P = .02), and A1C (mean, -0.10%; P = .02). Colesevelam did not significantly change 2-hour post-OGTT glucose (-1.9 mg/dL; P = .75) or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.5%; P = .80). In addition, colesevelam significantly increased triglyceride levels relative to placebo (median, 14.3%; P < .001). The proportion of patients achieving target levels with colesevelam versus placebo, respectively, was as follows: LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (29% versus 11%; P < .001), A1C < 6.0% (37% versus 25%; P = .05), FPG < 110 mg/dL (48% versus 56%; P = .97), and normalization of glucose (FPG < 100 mg/dL [40% versus 23%; P = .06]). Colesevelam had a weight-neutral effect and was well tolerated.ConclusionColesevelam is an option for managing the lipid profile and normalizing glucose levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia and prediabetes. Further study is warranted to determine whether colesevelam slows or prevents progression of prediabetes to type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:617-628)     

Effect Of A Targeted Glycemic Management Program On Provider Response To Inpatient Hyperglycemia

ObjectiveTo report the results of implementation of a Targeted Glycemic Management (TGM) Service pilot, with the goals of improving clinician awareness of available inpatient glycemic management protocols and improving responsiveness to and frequency of severe hyperglycemia.MethodsPatients with a blood glucose (BG) level ≥ 300 mg/dL who were hospitalized on a general medicine unit during three 12-week periods before, during, and after the TGM pilot were compared for responsiveness by the primary team, percentage of subsequent BG measurements between 80 and 180 mg/dL, and frequency of subsequent severe hyperglycemia (BG levels ≥ 300 mg/dL) and hypoglycemia (BG values < 70 mg/dL).ResultsIn comparison with pre-TGM and post-TGM periods, more patients during the TGM pilot had a modification of their glycemic regimen in response to severe hyperglycemia (49% versus 73% versus 50%, before, during, and after TGM, respectively; P = .044), and the percentage of patients with ≥ 50% of subsequent BG measurements in the desired range (27% versus 53% versus 32%; P = .035) was greatest during the TGM period. The incidence of subsequent severe hyperglycemia (20% versus 9% versus 16%; P = .0004) was lowest during the TGM period; however, the incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in all 3 periods (3.9% versus 3.7% versus 3.7%).ConclusionThese results indicate that a TGM Service can favorably influence glycemic management practices and improve glycemic control, but ongoing intervention is necessary for maintenance of these results. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:552-557)     

The anti-diabetic effects of GLP-1-gastrin dual agonist ZP3022 in ZDF rats

Aims/hypothesisCombination treatment with exendin-4 and gastrin has proven beneficial in treatment of diabetes and preservation of beta cell mass in diabetic mice. Here, we examined the chronic effects of a GLP-1-gastrin dual agonist ZP3022 on glycemic control and beta cell dysfunction in overtly diabetic Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) rats.MethodsZDF rats aged 11 weeks were dosed s.c., b.i.d. for 8 weeks with vehicle, ZP3022, liraglutide, exendin-4, or gastrin-17 with or without exendin-4. Glycemic control was assessed by measurements of HbA1c and blood glucose levels, as well as glucose tolerance during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Beta cell dynamics were examined by morphometric analyses of beta and alpha cell fractions.ResultsZP3022 improved glycemic control as measured by terminal HbA1c levels (6.2 ± 0.12 (high dose) vs. 7.9 ± 0.07% (vehicle), P < 0.001), as did all treatments, except gastrin-17 monotherapy. In contrast, only ZP3022, exendin-4 and combination treatment with exendin-4 and gastrin-17 significantly improved glucose tolerance and increased insulin levels during an OGTT. Moreover, only ZP3022 significantly enhanced the beta cell fraction in ZDF rats, a difference of 41%, when compared to the vehicle group (0.31 ± 0.03 vs. 0.22 ± 0.02%, respectively, P < 0.05).ConclusionThese data suggest that ZP3022 may have therapeutic potential in the prevention/delay of beta cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes.     

Postural stability in young healthy subjects – Impact of reduced base of support,visual deprivation,dual tasking

ObjectiveTo provide normative postural stability data in young subjects.MethodsNinety-six healthy participants (58 W, 28 ± 6y) stood on a force plate during 60 s. We measured effects of support width (feet apart, FA; feet together, FT), vision (eyes open, EO; closed, EC), and cognitive load (single task, ST; dual tasking, DT) on anteroposterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) ranges, area and planar velocity of center of pressure (COP) trajectory.ResultsAll variables increased with FT (AP range, +15%; ML, +185%; area, +242%; velocity, +50%, p < 0.0002 for all, MANOVA). Visual deprivation increased COP ranges with added constraints (FT or DT, p = 0.002) and increased velocity in all conditions (FA/ST, +16%; DT, +18%; FT/ST, +29%; DT, +23%, p < 0.0002 for all). Dual tasking reduced COP displacements with FT (AP range, EO, −15%; EC, −11%; ML range, EO, −19%; EC, −13%; area, EO, −40%; EC, −28%, p < 0.0002 for all) and increased velocity in most conditions (FA/EO, +15%; FA/EC, +16%; FT/EO, +7%, p < 0.0002 for all).ConclusionIn young healthy adults, base of support reduction increases COP displacements. Vision particularly affects postural stability with feet together or dual tasking. Dual tasking increases velocity but decreases COP displacements in challenging postural tasks, potentially by enhanced lower limb stiffness.     

Achievement of therapeutic targets in Mexican patients with diabetes mellitus

Background and aimComplications of diabetes comprise the leading cause of death in Mexico. We aimed to describe the characteristics of management and achievement of therapeutic targets in Mexican patients with diabetes mellitus.MethodsWe analyzed data from 2642 Mexican patients with type 1 (T1D, n = 203, 7.7%) and type 2 diabetes (T2D, n = 2439, 92.3%) included in the third wave of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study.ResultsOf T2D patients, 63% were on oral glucose-lowering drugs (OGLD) exclusively (mostly metformin), 11% on insulin, 22% on OGLD plus insulin, and 4% on diet and exercise exclusively. T2D patients on insulin were more likely to be trained on diabetes, but they were older, had worse control, longer disease duration and more chronic complications than patients on OGLD only. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) < 7% was achieved by 21% and 37% of T1D and T2D patients, respectively. Only 5% of T1D and 3% of T2D attained the composite target of HbA1c < 7%, blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 100 mg/dl. T1D patients had less macrovascular but more microvascular complications, compared with T2D patients. Late complications increased with disease duration, so that about 80% of patients after 20 years of diagnosis have at least one late complication. Reaching the target HbA1c < 7% was associated with a reduced number of microvascular but not with less macrovascular complications.ConclusionA great proportion of these Mexican patients with diabetes did not reach therapeutic targets. Insulin was used mostly in complicated cases with advanced disease.     

Podocyte as A Potential Target of Inflammation: Role of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo observe the effects of pioglitazone hydrochloride on urinary sediment podocalyxin and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) excretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and to explore its possible renoprotective mechanisms.MethodsNinety-eight patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, who were previously prescribed metformin, acarbose, or both, were randomly assigned to a DP group (add-on pioglitazone; n = 49) or a DS group (add-on sulfonylurea; n = 49).ResultsAfter 12 weeks of treatment, both add-on pioglitazone therapy (the DP group) and add-on sulfonylurea therapy (the DS group) demonstrated a similar improvement in fasting blood glucose and hemoglobin A_1c, but systolic and diastolic blood pressure declined significantly in only the DP group. Moreover, the DP group showed significantly better efficacy in reducing urinary MCP-1 excretion in comparison with the DS group. Furthermore, both urinary albumin and urinary sediment podocalyxin excretion decreased significantly in the DP group but not in the DS group. The urinary sediment podocalyxin to creatinine ratio had a positive correlation with urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (r = 0.624; P < .01) and urinary MCP-1 to creatinine ratio (r = 0.346; P < .01).ConclusionPioglitazone treatment revealed a podocyte-protective capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes, and the underlying mechanisms may be partly attributed to its effective suppression of excessive local renal inflammation. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:493-498)     

BDNF serum concentrations in first psychotic episode drug-naïve schizophrenic patients: Associations with personality and BDNF Val66Met polymorphism

AimsTo investigate the relationship among brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) serum concentrations, BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and personality profile in drug-naïve schizophrenic patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and healthy participants.Main methodsThis cross-sectional study included fifty FEP patients and fifty healthy participants who served as controls. To study their personality profile the standardized Greek version of the Alternative Five-Factor Zuckerman–Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ) was administered. Serum BDNF levels were measured and genotyping of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism was performed in patients and healthy subjects.Key findingsFEP patients presented lower BDNF serum concentrations (P = 0.002) and higher scores in ZKPQ Neuroticism (P = 0.001) and Aggression–Hostility (P = 0.002) scales while lower scores in the ZKPQ Sociability scale (P < 0.001) than healthy participants. Multivariate analysis revealed that the odds of being assessed with FEP were 0.4 times lower in those with higher BDNF values (P < 0.001) and 1.8 times greater in those with higher Neuroticism scores (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences with respect to the Val66Met polymorphism between patients and healthy participants.SignificanceReduced BDNF serum concentrations along with higher Neuroticism scores might be associated with FEP. A complex interplay between BDNF serum concentrations, personality traits, BDNF Val66Met polymorphism, and psychotic symptomatology has been arisen but further investigation is needed to better clarify the observed associations.     

Association of Glycemic Control Parameters with Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Critical Illness

ObjectiveChronic critical illness (CCI) is a term used to designate patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy with associated poor outcomes. The present study assessed the impact of glycemic parameters on outcomes in a CCI population.MethodsA retrospective case series was performed including 148 patients in The Mount Sinai Hospital Respiratory Care Unit (2009-2010). Utilizing a semi-parametric mixture model, trajectories for the daily mean blood glucose (BG), BG range, and hypoglycemia rate over time identified low- (n = 87) and high-risk (n = 61) hyperglycemia groups and low- (n = 90) and high-risk (n = 58) hypoglycemia groups. The cohort was also classified into diabetes (DM, n = 48), stress hyperglycemia (SH, n = 85), and normal glucose (n = 15) groups.ResultsHospital- (28% vs. 13%, P = .0199) and 1-year mortality (66% vs. 46%, P = .0185) rates were significantly greater in the high- versus low-risk hyperglycemia groups, respectively. The hypoglycemia rate (< 70 mg/dL) was lower among ventilator-liberated patients compared to those who failed to liberate (0.092 vs. 0.130, P < .0001). In the SH group, both hospital mortality (high-risk hyperglycemia 48% and low-risk hyperglycemia 15%, P = .0013) and 1-year mortality (high-risk 74% and low-risk 50%, P = .0482) remained significantly different, while no significant difference in the diabetes group was observed. There were lower hypoglycemia rates with SH compared to diabetes (< 70 mg/dL: 0.086 vs. 0.182, P < .0001; < 40 mg/dL: 0.012 vs. 0.022, P = .0118, respectively).ConclusionTighter glycemic control was associated with improved outcomes in CCI patients with SH but not in CCI patients with diabetes. Confirmation of these findings may lead to stratified glycemic control protocols in CCI patients based on the presence or absence of diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:884-893)     

Postprandial Dynamics of Plasma Glucose,Insulin, and Glucagon in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Saxagliptin Plus Dapagliflozin Add-On to Metformin Therapy

ObjectiveTo analyze changes in plasma glucose, insulin, and glucagon in relation to glycemic response during treatment with dual add-on of saxagliptin (SAXA) plus dapagliflozin (DAPA) to metformin XR (MET) compared with SAXA add-on or DAPA add-on alone to MET in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) poorly controlled with MET.MethodsDouble-blind trial in adults with glycated hemoglobin (HbAlc) ≥ 8.0 to ≤ 12.0% randomized to SAXA 5 mg/day plus DAPA 10 mg/day (n = 179), or SAXA 5 mg/day and placebo (n = 176), or DAPA 10 mg/day and placebo (n = 179) added to background MET ≥ 1,500 mg/ day. The mean change from baseline in the area under the curve from 0 to 180 minutes (AUC_{0-180 min}) was calculated for glucose, insulin, and glucagon obtained during a liquid meal tolerance test (MTT).ResultsGlucose AUC_{0-180 min} an was reduced more from baseline with SAXA + DAPA + MET (-12,940 mg/dL) compared with SAXA + MET (-6,309 mg/dL) and DAPA + MET (-11,247 mg/dL). Insulin AUC_{0-180 min} significantly decreased with SAXA + DAPA + MET (-1,120 μU/mL) and DAPA + MET (-1,019 μU/mL) and increased with SAXA + MET (661 μU/mL). Glucagon AUC_{0-180 min} only increased with DAPA + MET (2,346 pg/mL). The changes in glucose (P < .0001) and insulin (P = .0003) AUC_{0-180 min} correlated with change in HbA1c, whereas the change in glucagon AUC_{0-180 min} min did not (P = .27).ConclusionsWhen added to background MET, the combination of SAXA + DAPA provided additional reductions in glucose AUC_{0-180 min} and HbA1c without the increase in insulin seen with SAXA and without the increase in glucagon seen with DAPA. Changes in insulin and glucose but not glucagon AUC_{0-180 min} correlated with change in HbA1c. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:1187-1197)     

Effects of Colesevelam,Rosiglitazone, or Sitagliptin on Glycemic Control and Lipid Profile in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by Metformin Monotherapy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the glycemic effect of colesevelam, rosiglitazone, or sitagliptin when added to metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and to examine the effects of these antidiabetes agents on lipid and lipoprotein levels.MethodsThis 16-week, open-label pilot study conducted between May 2007 and April 2008 at 20 sites in the United States, 7 sites in Mexico, and 6 sites in Colombia, enrolled adults with inadequately controlled type 2 DM (glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c], 7.0%-10.0%) on a stable metformin regimen (1500-2550 mg daily for ≥ 3 months). At Week 0, participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to open-label colesevelam hydrochloride, 3.75 g daily; openlabel rosiglitazone maleate, 4 mg daily; or open-label sitagliptin phosphate, 100 mg daily, in addition to existing metformin therapy. The primary efficacy variable was the change in HbA_1c from baseline to Week 16 with last (postbaseline) observation carried forward.ResultsIn total, 169 participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups (colesevelam, n = 57; rosiglitazone, n = 56; and sitagliptin, n = 56), and 141 participants (83.4%) completed the study. Least-squares mean reductions in HbA_1c from baseline were observed in all groups at Week 16 last observation carried forward (colesevelam, -0.3% [P <.031]; rosiglitazone: -0.6% [P <.001]; sitagliptin: -0.4% [P <.009]) At study end, 10 of 56 participants (17.9%) in the colesevelam group, 19 of 54 (35.2%) in the rosiglitazone group, and 15 of 55 (27.3%) in the sitagliptin group achieved HbA_1c < 7.0%. Colesevelam significantly reduced mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels relative to baseline (11.6%), whereas levels were significantly increased with rosiglitazone and sitagliptin at Week 16 last observation carried forward (7.8% and 7.7%, respectively). Twenty-two of 52 participants (42.3%) in the colesevelam group, 12 of 51 (23.5%) in the rosiglitazone group, and 13 of 53 (24.5%) in the sitagliptin group achieved LDL cholesterol < 100 mg/dL at Week 16 last observation carried forward.ConclusionAll 3 antidiabetes agents significantly improved glycemic control, but only colesevelam also significantly reduced LDL-cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 DM. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:53-63)